Top Banner

Click here to load reader

36

Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Jan 02, 2016

Download

Documents

rhlvrm

Cryogenic Rocket Engine
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

CHALLENGES IN CRYOGENIC DEVELOPMENT

PRESENT & THE FUTURE

Presentation by

NK GUPTAProject Director, C25

LPSC-ISRO, Trivandrum

Twentieth National ConferenceNew Delhi

April 10-11, 2006

Page 2: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

SATELLITE

C25

L110 (ES)

S200(2 Nos)

GSLV MARK III VEHICLE

Page 3: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Fig 1. STAGE FLOW DIAGRAM

Page 4: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Fig 2. ENGINE OPERATING CYCLES

Expander Cycle Staged combustion Cycle GG Cycle

Page 5: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF VARIOUS CYCLES (Comb. Chamber Pc=60Ksc, MR=6.4, AR=200)

217215-#Incr. P/L from GG Cycle (Kg)

33.4633.3534.87Thrust/weight Ratio

604606587Engine Weight (Kg)

20.21220.21220.468Engine Thrust (T)

5.8725.8725.441Engine Mixture Ratio

459.45459.45453.39Engine lsp. (s)

15512999LH2 Pump Outlet Pr. (Ksc)

Expander Cycle

Staged Combustion

Cycle

Gas Generator Cycle

Page 6: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Fig 1. ENGINE / SUBSYSTEMS

GAS GENERATOR

LOX TURBOPUMP

LH2 TURBOPUMP

INTEGRATED TURBOPUMP

THRUST CHAMBER

FLUID COMPONENTS

INTEGRATED ENGINE (SL)

Page 7: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Fig 3 STAGES OF COPPER CONVERGENT INNER SHELL DEEP DRAWING

2

5

Page 8: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

STAGES OF COPPER DIVERGENT INNER SHELL DEEP DRAWING

1

3

3 4

Page 9: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Combustion chamber helical channel milling

Page 10: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

C20 INJECTOR BODY

Page 11: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

GAS GENERATOR

Page 12: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Fig 6. IGNITORS FOR CRYO ENGINES

1

2

110

17

54

3

4

EBW

EBW

Electric igniterPyrogen igniter

Page 13: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

GG

INJECTION VALVES

LH2

EXHAUST GAS DUCT

LOX

GG WITH FEED CIRCUIT FOR TESTING

Page 14: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

CE20 GAS GENERATOR MOUNTED AT TEST BED

Page 15: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Fig 5. GG HOT TEST SEQUENCE

OPEN Tf+0.2

OPEN Tf+2.5

OPEN Tf+1.5

HELIUM PURGE VALVE

LH2 VENT VALVE (HVV1)

LOX VENT VALVE (OVV1)

LOX VENT VALVE (OVV2)

LH2 INJECTION VALVE(HIV1)

LH2 INJECTION VALVE(HIV2)

IGNITER

LOX INJECTION VALVE(OIV1) LOX INJECTION VALVE(OIV2)

ToOPEN To-20

Tf =To + 50 s

OPEN To

CLOSE To+ 1.5 CLOSE Tf+10

CLOSE To-3

ON To+0.2 To+ 2.7

OPEN To+0.3 CLOSE Tf

CLOSE To-3.3

CLOSE To-6.5

CLOSE To-10

CLOSE Tf + 2.5

OPEN To+ 1.5 CLOSE Tf + 1

OPEN To+ 2.7 CLOSE Tf - 4

CLOSE To-5

Page 16: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Fig 7. PERFORMANCE OF GG IN HOT TEST

3 0

4 0

3 7 .8 +

s)

G G 0 2 H T 0 2 T E S T

Page 17: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

CE20 GAS GENERATOR HOT TEST VIDEO FOOTAGE

Page 18: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Fig 8 CE20 ENGINE- TURBINES ARRANGEMENT

LH2 TURBINELOX TURBINE

TURBINE EXHAUST NOZZLE

Page 19: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Fig 4. DOUBLE LAYERED RING

SINTERED BRONZE SEALRING

Page 20: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

DETAILS OF DOUBLE LAYERED RING

Major specifications :Property External layer Internal layer

• Composition Cu-10%Sn Cu-10%Sn-5%BN• Porosity(%) 30 Max. 20-35• Hardness(BHN) 50 Min. 35 Max• Bending strength 250 min(MPa) 100 min (MPa) • UTS 150 min. (MPa) 50 min (MPa)

Present status of Technology :The technology of processing double layered seal rings of all 3 sizes has been established through powder metallurgy route for application in C-25

Page 21: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Bronze Bronze SealringSealring(YMB(YMB--22)22) OD 53 x ID 44 x 11.3

mm

OD 110 x ID 100 x 12

mm

OD 126 x ID 118 x 9.5

mm

CC--25 Turbo Pump25 Turbo Pump

Page 22: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

CE20 TP DEVELOPMENT TESTS

A. Cold Flow Tests with water/GN2

1. Pump tests, driven by Electric Motor.

2. Turbine test driven by GN2 absorbed by Dynamometer.

3. Integrated Turbo-pump test with GN2 & water.

B. Tests with Cryo Fluids LN2,LOX,LH2

4. Turbine driven by GN2 & Pump working with LN2.

5. Turbine driven by GG & Pump working with LN2.

6. Turbine driven by GG & Pump working with LH2/ LOX

C. Integrated Turbo-pump Tests

7. GG-LH2TP-LOXTP integrated tests.

Page 23: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

LH2 PUMP COLD FLOW TEST

Proto LH2 pump at test bed for testing with water & driven by electric motor

Page 24: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

LH2 TURBINE COLD FLOW TEST

Pi = 8.1 bar, Pout =1 bar,Ti = 284K, Flow =1.1 kg/sPR = 8.1 , U/Co = 0.15

LH2 Turbine tested with GN2 at design pressure ratio and low power level. Cd & efficiency as expected. Speed= 8300 rpm

Power= 80 KWCd value = 0.91-0.93Efficiency= 47% at U/Co=0.15

Page 25: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

LH2 TURBOPUMP

LOX TURBOPUMP

Page 26: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

LOX TP Development tests with LN2

Page 27: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

CE20 LOX TP test with GN2-LN2

Speed: 13000 rpmLN2 Flow: 28 lit/secPump Head: 6 MPa

Page 28: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Fig 9. LOX TURBOPUMP TEST DATA WITH LN2

10000

12000

14000

m

LOX TURBOPUMP TEST

Page 29: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

LH2 TANK

ITSc

LOX TANK

ENGINE

Fig 10

Page 30: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

SPECIFICATIONS OF ENGINE & STAGE

Propellant Combination : LOX/LH2

Total propellant loading : 25790 kg

Operating Cycle : Gas Generator

Thrust, Nominal (Vacuum), kN : 200.7 (±3.0%)

Engine Specific Impulse, s : 443 ± 3

Engine Burn Duration (Nom), s : 550

Chamber Pressure, (Nom), MPa : 6.0

Engine Mixture Ratio : 5.05 (±1.5%)

LOX Flow Rate, kg/s : 38.546

LH2 Flow Rate, kg/s : 7.638

TP speed : 38000 rpm(LH2)

15000 rpm(LOX)

Page 31: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Anti static coatingHeat shield coatingVapour barrier coating

PUF

Adhesive

Tank wall

Fig. 11 CRYO TANK THERMAL INSULATION

Page 32: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Fig 12 Thrust Chamber Test Facility

Page 33: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

Thrust Chamber Test Facility

Page 34: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development
Page 35: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development
Page 36: Challenges in Cryogenic Rocket Engine Development

CE20 ENGINE SUBSYSTEM TESTS

SINGLE ELEMENT HOT TESTS

GAS GENERATOR DEVELOPMENT TESTS

TURBO-PUMP BEARING TESTS WITH LN2; LOX/LH2

LOX TP SEAL TESTS WITH LN2 & LOX

LH2 TP SEAL TESTS WITH LN2 & LH2

LOX TURBO-PUMP TESTS GN2 & LN2/LOX; GG & LN2 /LOX

LH2 TURBO-PUMP CRYO TESTS GN2/GG & LN2/LH2

INTEGRATED TURBO-PUMP TEST (Pr Fed / Boot Strap)

SUB SCALE CHAMBER (19 ELEMENT) TEST

INTEGRATED SEA-LEVEL ENGINE TEST