Top Banner
1 Born in Moscow in 1863, Constantin Sergeyevich Stanislavsky had a more profound effect on the process of acting than anyone else in the twentieth century. It was his assertion that if the theater was going to be meaningful it needed to move beyond the external representation that acting had primarily been. Over forty years he created an approach that forefronted the psychological and emotional aspects of acting. The Stanislavsky System, or "the method," as it has become known, held that an actor’s main responsibility was to be believed (rather than recognized or understood). Today in the United States, Stanislavsky’s theories are the primary source of study for many actors. Among the many great actors and teachers to use his work are Marlon Brando and Gregory Peck. Many of artists have continued experimentation with Stanislavsky’s ideas. Among the best known of these proponents is the Actors Studio, an organization that has been home to some of the most talented and successful actors of our time. Stanislavsky saw that the difference between the good actor and the great actor was the ability to be relaxed, and to be private in public. We learn from Stanislavsky: As the students relax before the lecture start; they clean the slate, going to a zero state, being ready for the best performance in the learning process. State Zero
21
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Ch5 1 process

1

Born in Moscow in 1863, Constantin Sergeyevich Stanislavsky had a more profound effect on the process of acting than anyone else in the twentieth century. It was his assertion that if the theater was going to be meaningful it needed to move beyond the external representation that acting had primarily been. Over forty years he created an approach that forefronted the psychological and emotional aspects of acting. The Stanislavsky System, or "the method," as it has become known, held that an actor’s main responsibility was to be believed (rather than recognized or understood).

Today in the United States, Stanislavsky’s theories are the primary source of study for many actors. Among the many great actors and teachers to use his work are Marlon Brando and Gregory Peck. Many of artists have continued experimentation with Stanislavsky’s ideas. Among the best known of these proponents is the Actors Studio, an organization that has been home to some of the most talented and successful actors of our time.

Stanislavsky saw that the difference between the good actor and the great actor was the ability to be relaxed, and to be private in public.

We learn from Stanislavsky: As the students relax before the lecture start; they clean the slate, going to a zero state, being ready for the best performance in the learning process.

State Zero

Page 2: Ch5 1 process

2

Quality Function Deployment (QDF)

An approach that integrates “the voice of customer”into product development and design process

House of QualityHouse of Quality

Page 3: Ch5 1 process

3

Customer Requirements and Technical Requirements

Page 4: Ch5 1 process

4

Competitive Evaluation

Page 5: Ch5 1 process

5

Correlation Between Technical Requirements

Page 6: Ch5 1 process

6

Ch 5(A) : Process Planning

Page 7: Ch5 1 process

7

Process Planning is among System Design duties in OM.

Forecasting

Product and service design

Capacity planning

Facilities andEquipment

Layout

Work design

Processselection

Process Selection in Operations Management

Page 8: Ch5 1 process

8

Process Architectures

Process Architecture refers to Physical layout of resources

Job ShopBatch ProcessingFlow ShopContinuous Flow

Flexibility of resourcesR_Human: Cross functional workersR_Capital: Short set-up time

Page 9: Ch5 1 process

9

System Example

Job Shop Commercial Printer

Batch Processing Heavy Equipment

Flow Shop (Production Line) Car Assembly

Continuous Flow Sugar Refinery

Examples of 4 basic type production Systems

Most Processes are some where between Job shop and Flow shop

Page 10: Ch5 1 process

10

Process Architectures: Job Shop

A

C

B

D

Product 1

Output

Input

Product 2

Page 11: Ch5 1 process

11

Job Shop

Functional layout or Process layout: similar resources in the same department. Ex. all press machines are located in stamping department. Ex. Bakeries, law firms, emergency rooms, repair shops.

low volume, high variety customized products flexible resources skilled human resources jumbled work flows high material handling large of inventories long flow time highly structured information system high cost per unit of product but low investment

Page 12: Ch5 1 process

12

Process Architectures: Flow Shop

OutputInput

A

C

BD

B A

Product 1

Product 2

Page 13: Ch5 1 process

13

Flow Shop

Product layout or line layout: Resources are arranged according to the sequence of the operations. Usually requires duplication ( and investment) of a resource pool; dedication of resources.

Discrete flow shop: assembly line Continuous flow shop: beverage, chemical plant, process plant. high standardization, high speed low material handling short flow time low unit-processing costs high investment cost; needs mass production. special purpose equipment, and low skilled labor prevent

flexibility

Page 14: Ch5 1 process

14

ProcessFlexibility

Jumbled Flow.Process segmentsloosely linked.

Disconnected LineFlow/Jumbled Flowbut a dominant flowexists.

JOB SHOP

(Commercial Printer,Architecture firm)

BATCH

(Heavy Equipment,Auto Repair)

FLOW SHOP

(Auto Assembly,Car lubrication shop)

CONTINUOUSFLOW

(Oil Refinery)

ProductVariety

LowLow Standardization

One of a kindLow Volume

Many ProductsFew Major Products

High volume

High StandardizationCommodity Products

Connected LineFlow (assembly line)

Continuous, automated,rigid line flow.Process segments tightlylinked.

Oppor

tunity

Costs

Out-of

-poc

ket

Costs

High

Low

High

Matching Process Choice with Strategy: Product-Process Matrix

Page 15: Ch5 1 process

15

ProcessFlexibility

Jumbled Flow.Process segmentsloosely linked.

Disconnected LineFlow/Jumbled Flowbut a dominant flowexists.

JOB SHOP

(Commercial Printer,Architecture firm)

BATCH

(Heavy Equipment,Auto Repair)

FLOW SHOP

(Auto Assembly,Car lubrication shop)

CONTINUOUSFLOW

(Oil Refinery)

ProductVariety

LowLow Standardization

One of a kindLow Volume

Many ProductsFew Major Products

High volume

High StandardizationCommodity Products

Connected LineFlow (assembly line)

Continuous, automated,rigid line flow.Process segments tightlylinked.

Oppor

tunity

Costs

Out-of

-poc

ket

Costs

High

Low

High

A similar graph can be prepared to show the relationship between process flexibility and cost, or process flexibility and response time, but not for quality.

Matching Process Choice with Strategy: Product-Process Matrix

Page 16: Ch5 1 process

16

Volume

Variety

ABC Analysis in Production System Design

JobShop

BatchProductio

n

FlowShop

Page 17: Ch5 1 process

17

Manual Machines; A manual operator load and unload the part, and intervenes during the operations

NC (Numerically Controlled) machines; Machines are programmed to perform specific operations. Loading and unloading of parts are manual.

CNC (Computerized Numerically Controlled); Each machine is controlled by a computer

Computer-integrated manufacturing (CIM); A computerized system for linking a broad rang of automated manufacturing, loading and unloading, and material handling systems

Levels of Automation

Page 18: Ch5 1 process

18

• Design capacity– Maximum obtainable output--Vendor claim

• Effective capacity– Maximum capacity given product mix, scheduling difficulties, and

other doses of reality--We believe

• Actual output– The output that is actually achieved--cannot exceed effective

capacity-- We really achieve

Capacity

Page 19: Ch5 1 process

19

Efficiency and Utilization

Efficiency Capacity Effective

Output Actual

n Utilizatio CapacityDesign

Output Actual

Page 20: Ch5 1 process

20

Design capacity = 50 trucks/day

Effective capacity = 40 trucks/day

Actual output = 36 units/day

Example : Efficiency and Utilization

Efficiency Capacity Effective

Output Actual

n Utilizatio CapacityDesign

Output Actual

%90unit/day 40

unit/day 36

%72unit/day 50

unit/day 36

Page 21: Ch5 1 process

21

Given the following informationEffective capacity = 80 units per day. Design capacity = 100 units per day Efficiency = %50Utilization is equal to

Efficiency = (Actual Output)/(Effective Capacity) = .5(Actual Output)/(80) = .5Actual Output = 40Utilization = (Actual Output)/(Design Capacity) Utilization = 40/100Utilization = .4 or 40%