Top Banner
+ Five Common but Questionable Principles of Multimedia Learning Lourdes Arnal De Prats Robert Rivas
13
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Ch 6 Presentation

+

Five Common but Questionable Principles of Multimedia Learning

Lourdes Arnal De PratsRobert Rivas

Page 2: Ch 6 Presentation

+Principle 1 – Multimedia Instruction Produces More Learning than “Live” Instruction or Other Media

Method Confounding

Learning influenced by instructional methods embedded in instruction

Instructional Method = any way to shape information that compensates for or supplants the cognitive processes necessary for achievement or motivation

All instructional methods that are necessary for any kind of learning can be presented in a variety of media

Learning Benefits due to multimedia alone have not been found

Page 3: Ch 6 Presentation

+Principle 1 – Multimedia Instruction Produces More Learning than “Live” Instruction or Older Media

Sensory Mode & Learning

Learners are often overloaded by distractions in multimedia presentations (animations, video, colorful displays, sounds, music, etc.) – think cognitive load theory

Integration of visual and narrative descriptions is beneficial to learning, but is not a benefit exclusive to multimedia

Page 4: Ch 6 Presentation

+Principle 2 – Multimedia Instruction is More Motivating than Traditional Instructional Media or Live Instructors 3 outcomes of motivation – (1) active choice, (2)

persistence, and (3) mental effort

Interest Satisfaction = when students choose multimedia courses over traditional courses for convenience purposes – a negative relationship exists between interest and satisfaction

Mental Effort = many instructional strategies & complex screen displays risk overloading working memory

Persistence = lack of instructor interaction may result in lack of student persistence

Page 5: Ch 6 Presentation

+Principle 2 – Multimedia Instruction is More Motivating than Traditional Instructional Media or Live Instructors

Motivation to choose multimedia vs. motivation to learn Students expectations of flexibility and ease of learning in

multimedia courses may cause reduced effort, and therefore reduced learning.

Page 6: Ch 6 Presentation

+

Activity

Page 7: Ch 6 Presentation

+Principle 3 – Multimedia Shares Instruction for Different Learning Styles

Students’ preferred learning method is often insignificant – learning style inventories usually attribute students with different learning styles

Students regularly learn more in instruction that is not their preferred medium

Increased instructional support in areas with little prior knowledge reduces risk of cognitive overload

Page 8: Ch 6 Presentation

+Principle 4 - Multimedia Instruction Can Provide Active Pedagogical Agents That Increase Motivation and Aid Learning

Agent Research results are mixed. In some studies the results

indicate that motivation and learning is enhanced. Other studies provide confusing findings due to design errors.

Well controlled studies provided consistent results: “PPP Persona “agent v. arrows study indicated that cognitive and performance tests were not affected by either media. In conclusion, animated agents do not increase learning

Learners may form a social relationship with a computer without the help of an agent

Page 9: Ch 6 Presentation

+Principle 5 - Multimedia Instruction Provides Learner Control and Discovery Pedagogy to Enhance Learning Forty years of research

have not proven the efficacy, efficiency, and successful transfer of skills of unstructured and pure discovery learning

Instructional support is not needed as much as learners gain mastery of basic knowledge.

Page 10: Ch 6 Presentation

+Principle 5 - Multimedia Instruction Provides Learner Control and Discovery Pedagogy to Enhance Learning Pure discovery learning does not use instructional support;

therefore, it imposes large amounts of extraneous cognitive load on novice and intermediate learners. The outcome is more mental effort and less post learning performance

Supported instruction for lower levels of ability students resulted in higher scores

Trashing or Floundering: Students lack of effective approach to interacting with the learning environment which interference with their ability to draw valid or helpful inferences from simulation outcomes.

Page 11: Ch 6 Presentation

+Conclusions

Multimedia is effective in reducing the time required to learn. According to Corbett there was a reduction of 40% learning time

Multimedia is more attractive option for instruction

Multimedia advocates emphasis that it is a tool to promote constructivist-based discovery and that it is self paced. Multimedia allows student to navigate between and within lessons.

Less time required of expert teachers

Page 12: Ch 6 Presentation

+Education Today & Tomorrow

Page 13: Ch 6 Presentation

+Bad News…

Students may be more interested in the technology and their learning is negatively affected by their lack of effort.

When students lack prior knowledge they do not seem to benefit from self discovery / unstructured instruction

Animated pedagogical agents do not seem to increase learning. On the contrary they can produce cognitive overload