Top Banner
LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES G G FALL 2011 FALL 2011
12

CF Fall Legislative Guide

Mar 08, 2016

Download

Documents

Commonwealth Foundation Fall Legislative Guide
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: CF Fall Legislative Guide

LegisLativePriorities

LegisLativePrioritiesGG

Fall 2011Fall 2011

Page 2: CF Fall Legislative Guide

School choice •Pennsylvaniapublicschoolspendingdoubledinthepast15years;performancedidnot. •In the commonwealth’s bottom five percent of schools, more than 5,400 acts of violence occurred in the 2008-09 school year,includingsevenrapesandmorethan3,000assaultsonstudentsandstaff. •Pennsylvania’sEducationalImprovementTaxCreditserves40,000studentsannually,butthousandsremainonwaitinglists. •Studies have shown school choice programs, including vouchers and tax credits, increase student performance, improve the qualityofpublicschools,andsavetaxpayersmoney.

liquor Store Privatization •PennsylvaniaandUtaharetheonlystateswheregovernmenthasacompletemonopolyoversalesofwineandliquor. •69percentofPennsylvaniavoterssupportgettinggovernmentoutoftheboozebusiness. •APennsylvaniaLiquorControlBoard-commissionedstudyfound that45percentofSoutheastPennsylvaniansbuywineand liquorinotherstates,eventhoughitisillegaltotransportalcoholacrossstatelines. •Pennsylvaniarankshigherthanthenationalaverageinunderagedrinking,underagebingedrinking,andbingedrinkingamong allresidents.Acomprehensivestudyshowsnolinkbetweengovernmentcontrolofalcoholsalesandnegativesocialimpacts.

MarcelluS Shale iMPact Fee/tax •Pennsylvania’snaturalgasindustryhaspaidmorethan$1.2billioninstatetaxessince2006.Inadditiontotaxes,gascompanies put$200million into improving local roads lastyear, andpaidoutanestimated$7billion in leaseand royaltypayments to residentssince2006. •PennStateeconomistsestimateMarcellusactivityspurredmorethan24,000newjobsinPennsylvaniain2009alone. •Lastyear,MarcellusgasproductionsavedPennsylvaniansanestimated$633millioninutilitycosts,orabout$200forevery familyoffour. •Anyimpactfeeassessedtothenaturalgasindustryshouldonlychargeforthegovernmentservicesgasdrillersareusingthatare notalreadybeingcoveredthroughcurrenttaxesandfees.

tranSPortation Funding •No additional transportation funding should be awarded without spending reforms. Every dollar spent on transportation shouldbeprioritized. •Redefiningprevailingwagesasthemarketwagewouldsavehundredsofmillionsofdollarseachyear. •Enablingpublic-private partnershipswould bring in private-sector funding and expertise both in new road construction and inmasstransitoperations. •Anyadditionalfundingneedsshouldbeborneonlybythosewhobenefit.Thisincludesridersofmasstransit.

charter School reForM •Charter school enrollment grew from 982 students in 1997 to 91,000 in 2010, as more parents exercised choice in their children’seducation. •Onaverage,charterschoolsreceiveandspendonlyabout83percentofwhatschooldistrictsspendforeachstudent. •Ifchartersfailtoperform,theymaybeshutdown.Ultimately,chartersfacethehighestaccountabilitystandard—parentalchoice. •Allowingalternativecharterschoolauthorizerswouldincreaseopportunitiesfornewandinnovativecharterschools.

LegisLativePriorities

LegisLativePrioritiesGG

Fall 2011Fall 2011

Page 3: CF Fall Legislative Guide

School choiceShould parents have more control over their child’s education?Pennsylvaniahasdoubledpublicschoolspendinginthepast15years,yetonly40percentof8th-gradestudentsscoredatoraboveproficiencylevelsontheNationalAssessmentofEducationalProg-ressreadingandmathematicsexams.Overthattime,enrollmentinPennsylvaniapublicschoolsdeclinedby26,960students,whileschoolshiredanadditional32,937employees.Nearlyeveryempiricalstudyshowsthatschoolchoiceprogramsincreaseacademicachievementforstudentsandimprovepublicschoolsthroughcompetition.It’stimetoempowerfamiliestopickthebestschoolfortheirchild.

Why does school choice need to happen this session?Inthecommonwealth’sbottomfivepercentofschools,fewerthan53percentofstudentswereproficientinreadingandmathin2009-10.Inthesame144schools,morethan5,400actsofviolenceoccurredinthe2008-09schoolyear,includingsevenrapesandmorethan3,000assaultsonstudentsandstaff.Onlybyactingnowcanlawmakersprovidealifelinetothesestudentsbeforesentencingthemtoanotheryearinviolentandfailingschools.

What can lawmakers do? Legislationhasbeenintroducedtoexpandeducationaltaxcreditsandimplementschoolvouchers.ThepopularEducationalImprovementTaxCreditProgram(EITC)supportsscholarshipsthathelpparentspaytuitionattheirschoolofchoicefromvoluntarycontributionsofPennsylvaniabusinesses.Vouchersprovidefamilieswithtaxpayermoney,inthiscaseafrac-tionoftheamountschoolscurrentlyspendperpupil,tohelpparentspayprivateorpublicschooltuition.

Does school choice provide a better education for children?Nineofthe10“goldstandard”evaluationsofvoucherprogramsre-portedstatisticallysignificantgainsinachievementforallorsomevoucherrecipients.VoucherprogramsimprovegraduationratesinplaceslikeWashington,D.C.,andMilwaukee,havehigherparentalsatisfactionratesandreducesegregation.

How does school choice affect public schools?Whenparentscanchoose,publicschoolsareforcedtocompete.In18outof19aca-demicallyrigorousstudies,vouchershadapositiveimpactonaffectedpublicschooldistricts.Nostudyhaseverdemonstratedthatscholarshipshaveanegativeimpactondistrictschoolperformanceortheirabilitytoraisefunds.

Can school choice save taxpayers money?TheEITCsavedtaxpayersanadditional$512millionlastyear,asstudentslefthigh-costdistrictschools.TheaverageEITCscholarshipis$1,044,whiletheaverageschooldistrictspendsover$14,000perstudent.Ifallstu-dentscurrentlyenrolledincharterschools,privateschoolsandhomeschoolingreturnedtodistrictschools,itwouldcosttaxpayersanadditional$3billionperyear.

Do parents want school choice?Sincethelate1990s,Pennsylvanialawmakershavecreatedcharterschools,cyberschoolsandpri-vateschoolscholarshipsthroughtheEducationalImprovementTaxCreditprogram.Yetlongwaitinglistsfortheselimitedoptionsshowthesupplyofschoolchoiceoptionsdoesnotmeetparentaldemand.Forexample,theChildren’sScholarshipFundPhiladelphiahad95,000applicationsfor7,700scholarshipsawardedoverthelast12years.

Page 4: CF Fall Legislative Guide

Government-run liquor StoreSShould Pennsylvania sell off the government-run liquor stores?EverystateexceptUtahprovidesmorefreedomoverwineandspiritssalesthanPennsylvania.Thesearetheonlystateswheregovernmenthasacompletemonopolyoverwholesaleandretailsalesofwineandliquor,aremnantofProhibition.Thislackofliquorlibertyhasturnedlaw-abidingresidentsintobootleggers.

ThePennsylvaniaLiquorControlBoard(PLCB)shouldconcentrateonitsenforcementroleandprivatebusinessesshouldbegiventheabilitytosellwineandspiritsinacompetitivemarket.ThiswillgivePennsylvaniansthesamefreedom,convenienceandpricingofferedinneighboringstates.

Are Pennsylvanians crossing the border to buy alcohol? A PLCB-commissioned study found that 45 percent of Southeast Pennsylvaniansbuywineandliquorinotherstates,eventhoughitisillegaltotransportacrossstatelines.BasedonPLCBsalesinjusttheseeightcountiesalone,thestatelosesanestimated$40millionperyearduetoborderbleed.

Do Pennsylvanians support private liquor stores? More than 69 percent of Pennsylvania voters support getting governmentoutoftheboozebusiness,accordingtorecentpolling.Supportforprivatizationtranscendspartylines,gender,unionmembership, economicmeansandallgeographicregionsofthestate.

Isn’t the liquor business a cash cow for the state?FromthewinekioskcatastrophethatcostmillionsbecausePLCBleadersignoredinternalrecommendationstonotproceed,tospending$66millionforaninventorydatabasethatunder-ordered(causingmanagerstohoard),thenover-ordered(wastingmillionsduetoproductspoilageandexcessstoragecosts),thePLCBhasmisusedtaxpayerre-sources.Lastyear,thePLCBfinishedwithayear-endfundbalanceofnegative$8million.

Is privatization safe?Contrarytothefacts,opponentsofprivatizationspreadfearthatlessgovernmentcontrolwillleadtoadversesocialimpacts.Ifmoregovernmentcontrolresultedinmoresafety,Pennsylvaniawouldberankedfirstorsecondinthenationinmea-sureoflowestalcoholuseandabuse.YetPennsylvaniarankshigherthanthenationalaverageinunderagedrinking,underagebingedrinking,andbingedrinkingamongallresidents.Thecommonwealthrankshigherthanmostofitsborderstatesinalcohol-relatedtrafficfatalitiesandtotalalcohol-relateddeathspercapita.Acomprehensivestudyshowsnolinkbetweengovernmentcontrolofal-coholsalesandnegativesocialimpacts.

PLCB Central Administrative Support Spending$80,000,000

$70,000,000

$60,000,000

$50,000,000

$40,000,000

$30,000,000

$20,000,000

$10,000,000

$02000-01

$26,705,659 $26,128,456

$28,729,098 $29,523,686 $28,434,203$32,095,769 $31,311,714

$34,434,698

$50,927,591

$66,816,185

2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Page 5: CF Fall Legislative Guide

What should the role of the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board be? Currently,thePLCBspendsmillionstoadvertisealcoholproducts,rebrandstoresandshiftoperatingpracticestolookmorelikeaprivatebusiness.Atthesametime,thePLCBischargedtoservetheroleofenforcer.ThisconflictofinterestmeansthePLCBcannotdedicateitsfullenergiestoenforcinglawsthatprotectcitizensfromunderagedrinking,bingedrinkingandotherformsofalcoholabuse.

marcelluS Shale impact Fee/taxShould the natural gas industry pay higher taxes or fees?Inconsideringthisquestion,weencouragepolicymakerstoapplythefollowingfiveprinciplestotheirdecision-makingprocess:

1. Businesses should pay the cost for the amount of government they use.Ifabusinessisnotpayingforitsnegativeimpacts ontheenvironmentand/orinfrastructure,itisappropriatetochargeafee/taxtopayforthegovernment’scosttoremediatethe problem.Sincedrilling’simpactongovernmentdoesnotincreaseifagaswellismoreprofitable,a“fee”shouldnotbetied toproduction. 2. Any fee/tax should be directly related to uncompensated costs of government.Anewfee/taxshouldnotbeimposedto extractadditionalrevenueforunrelatedgovernmentpurposesorsubsidies.Forexample,GrowingGreenerisnotdirectly relatedtoremediatingproblemscausedbythenaturalgasindustry.Theprogramsubsidizesawiderangeofprojectsfrom alternativeenergytodowntownredevelopment. 3. Any fee/tax rate should be established in the context of what businesses are already paying in taxes, fees, and contri- butions to local communities and the state, setting thefee/taxrateata level toonlycover thoseuncompensatedcosts ofgovernment. 4. Any fee/tax should be imposed at the county or municipal level, not at the state level.Thisensuresfee/taxcompetition betweenlocalgovernments,discouragesexcessivefeeortaxrates,andreducesthethreatofcross-subsidizationandredistri- butionofadditionalfee/taxrevenuestounrelatedgovernmentpurposes. 5. Beforeimposinganewfee/tax,electedofficialsshouldconsiderifcurrentlocaltaxesandfeesshouldberevisedto cover any uncompensated costs of government.Forexample,woulditbeappropriatetoadjustlocalhotelandemergency servicestaxestobetteraddresstheinfluxoflargenumbersofworkersintosparselypopulatedareasofPennsylvania?Or,are thereotherfee/taxmechanismsthatcanbemoredirectlytiedtoanyuncompensatedcostsofgovernment?

Page 6: CF Fall Legislative Guide

Is the natural gas industry avoiding taxes?No.There’snotaxloopholefordrillers.Theindustrypaysthesametaxesaseveryotherbusinessinthestate,includingthesecondhighestcorporatetaxrateinthenation.Theindustryhaspaidmorethan$1.2billioninstatetaxessince2006.

Are drilling companies paying their “fair share”?Thegasindustryshouldpayfortheirenvironmentalandinfrastructureimpactsorgovernmentservicesused.Directfeesforservices,roadmaintenanceagreements,andinsurancerequirementsforenvironmentalcostsareproperwaysofdealingwithdrilling’simpacts.

Actualimpactsshouldbemeasuredagainstwhattheindustryisalreadypayingintaxesandfees.Inadditiontotaxesandfees,gascompaniesput$200millionintoimprovinglocalroadslastyear.Drillingcompaniesareprovidingtransportationfundingfarabovewhatdrillingcommunitiesreceivefromthestate.Andstateoversightfordrillingisentirelyfundedthroughnaturalgaspermits.Drill-erspaymillionsinpermittingfeestocoverthecostofinspectioneachyear.Inaddition,thestateisexpectedtoreceive$60millioninroyaltiesfromdrillingonstate-ownedlandsnextyear.

Theindustryhaspaidoutanestimated$7billioninleaseandroyaltypaymentstoresidentssince2006.Butthat’snottheonlywaycountiesbenefiteconomically:Localgovernmentsarereceivingincreasedrevenuesfromlocaltaxesandprocessingfees.Forexample,in2010,BradfordCountyreceivedanestimated$1millionfromthedrillingindustrythroughminorrevenuestreamslikerecordingandcopyingfees.

Doesn’t every other state have a natural gas tax?That’sonlypartof thestory.Stateswithnaturalgas taxeshavefriendlierbusinessclimates—forinstance,TexasandWyominghaveneitherincomenorcorporatetaxes.Pennsylvaniaalreadyhasthe10thhighesttaxburdeninthenation.Moststateswithsimilarlydifficult-to-drillnaturalgas,likeArkansasandLouisiana,havereducedordelayedtheirseverancetaxestoallowdrillingcompaniestorecouptheirup-frontcosts.Pennsylvaniaiscurrentlyoneofthemostexpensivestatesinwhichtodrill;itcost25percentmoretodrillawellinPennsylvaniathanTexas,acostof$1millioninadditionalcosts.

The drilling companies won’t leave because the gas is here, right?Whilethedrillingindustrywon’tdisappearifaseverancetaxisenacted,therewillbeanimpact—it’sthroughreducedinvestmentinthestate,lowerwages,reductioninjobgrowthorareductioninspendingonthingslikeroadimprovements.AseverancetaxwouldhurtPennsylvanialandowners,becauseatypicalleasesplitsseverancetaxobligationsbetweendrillingcompaniesandlandowners.

Page 7: CF Fall Legislative Guide

Does Marcellus Shale exploration harm the environment?No.Pennsylvanialawsensuredrillingcompanies,andnottaxpayers, areheldresponsibleforenvironmentalandinfrastructuredamages.Forexample,whenEOGResourceshadanaccidentinClearfieldCounty,thecompanypaideighttimesinfinesthecostoftheinvestigationandcleanup.

tranSportation FundinGDoes Pennsylvania need more money for transportation?Pennsylvaniaroutinelyfinishesamongtheworststatesinrankingsofroadconditions,andamongthehighestinthenumberofstructurallydeficientbridges.YetPennsylvaniaalsorankshighamongstatesintermsofspendingonroadsandbridges(2ndhighestintotalinvestmentin2009),bothintermsofspendingpercapita(9thhighest)andspendingperhighwaymile(7thhighest).

Morefundingfortransportation—meaninghighertaxesorfeesonresidentsandmotorists—shouldonlyoccurwithsignificantre-formstotransportationfunding.Itiscriticaltoensurethateverysingletaxpayerdollariswell-spentbeforeaskingtaxpayerstopartwithmoreoftheirhard-earneddollars.

In2006,Gov.Rendell’sPennsylvaniaTransportationFundingandReformCommissionwrote:“TheCommissionconcludesthatnoadditionalfundingshouldbeprovidedforhighways,bridgesandtransitunlessaseriesofparallelactionsaretakentoreformfundingstructureandanumberoftransportationbusinesspractices.”Yetlittletonoreformhasoccurredtodate.

How is drilling impacting the economy?DozensofdrillingcompaniesareinvestinginPennsylvaniaandboostingtheeconomybycreatinghigh-paying,permanentjobsforlocals.CommunitieswithMarcellusShaledevelopmenthaveseenincreasesinsalestaxcollections,jobgrowthandincreasedpropertyvalues.In2009alone,PennStateeconomistsestimateMarcellusactivityspurredmorethan24,000newjobsinPennsylvania.

Howdoresidentsintherestofthestatebenefit?Pennsylvaniaconsumershavebenefitedfroma70percentreductioninnatural-gaspricessince2008,inlargepartduetothedramaticgrowthinshalegas.Lastyear,MarcellusgasproductionsavedPennsylvaniansanestimated$633millioninutilitycosts,orabout$200foreveryfamilyoffour.Thesesavingshavebeenespeciallybeneficialforlow-incomefamilies,whospendalmostaquarteroftheirafter-taxincomeonenergy.Anattackonaffordableenergyisanattackonlow-incomefamilies’abilitytoheattheirhomes,runhotwater,andcookfood.

Est. Cost of Power for Electricity Generation by Source (per kWh)$0.70

$0.60

$0.50

$0.40

$0.30

$0.20

$0.10

$0.00Solar PV Wind Waste Coal Natural Gas

Source: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, “The 2010 AEPS Annual Report”

Page 8: CF Fall Legislative Guide

How can the state prioritize spending?Hundredsofmillionsoftaxdollarsarespenteachyearonlesspressingprioritiessuchasbiketrails,beautificationefforts,corporatewelfare,hockeyarenas,conventioncenters,filmproductions,lobbyists,newroadsnamedforpoliticians,orflexingofhighwaymoneytomasstransit.

Moreover,transportationfundingmustbeconsideredinlightofallstatespendingpriorities.Itisinconsistenttosuggesttaxpayersmustpaymoreforbridgeandroadconstructionwhenthecommonwealthcanspend$200millioneachyearonRedevelopmentAssis-tanceCapitalProgramprojectsfromsportsstadiumstonewcorporateheadquarterstotheArlenSpecterLibrary.FundingforagenciesliketheCommonwealthFinancingAuthorityshouldberedirectedtofinanceinfrastructurewhichbenefitsallPennsylvaniansinsteadoffinancingcorporatewelfare.Transportationinfrastructureisalegitimatefunctionofgovernment,andshouldbeprioritizedassuch.

Can private-sector funding and innovation be used?Legislation toenable theuseofpublic-privatepartnerships (P3s)onnewconstructionseemstohavebeenahighpriorityforyears,buthasyettobeenacted.P3saretheemergingparadigmintransportationfunding.ImmediatelyimplementingP3sonnewconstructionofexpresslanes,highoccupancylanes,highways,andbridgescouldreducecoststotaxpayersandcommuters.

How can we improve roads and bridges without spending more money? Prevailingwagelawsdriveupthecostofroadconstruc-tion,makinggovernmentconstructioncontractsmoreexpensivebyforcingcontractorstopayhigherwagesthanthosepaidbytheprivatesectorforthesamejob.State-mandatedwagesforgovernmentprojectsare40percenthigher,onaverage,thanprivatesectorpayforthesamework.

Ten states have repealed prevailingwagemandates since 1980 tomaximize their transportation dollars. Forcing state and local governmentstooverspendonlaborcostsjusttoenforceamandateoriginallycreatedtopreventAfrican-Americanworkersfromthesouthfromtakingconstructionjobsdefiescommonsense.Tostretcheachtaxdollarfurther,wemustbeginwithredefiningprevailingwagerules.

If more funding is still needed, where should it come from?Totheextentpossible,additionaltransportationfundingshouldcomedirectlyfromtheuserswhobenefit.Thismayincludeadditionaltollroadsortolllanes,solongastollsflowsolelyintoimprovingtheroadbeingused,ratherthanbeingredirectedelsewhere.Tollingexistingfreewaysshouldnotbepursuedsimplytoredirectfueltaxes—thisincreasescross-subsidizationandwouldimposenewcostsondriverswhowouldnotbenefitfrominfrastructureimprove-ments.Likewise,ridersshouldbeartheprimaryburdenforfinancingthecostofmasstransit.

Pennsylvania State Transportation Budget(thousands of dollars)

$8,000,000

$7,000,000

$6,000,000

$5,000,000

$4,000,000

$3,000,000

$2,000,000

$1,000,000

$01995-

962003-

041997-

982005-

061999-

002007-

082001-

022009-

101996-

972004-

051998-

992006-

072000-

012008-

092002-

032010-

112011-

12

Page 9: CF Fall Legislative Guide

charter School reFormShould Pennsylvania make changes to its public charter school laws? Charterschoolsareself-managedpublicschoolsthatreceiveachartertooperatebylocalschooldistricts.Cybercharterschoolsarefull-timeonlineinstitutionsdirectlyapprovedbythePennsyl-vaniaDepartmentofEducation.

Schooldistrictscurrentlyauthorizecharterschools,whilesimultaneouslycompetingwithcharterschoolsforstudents.Thisisakin tohavingMcDonald’sapprove theopeningofanewWendy’snextdoor.Allowingalternativeauthorizers, including thestate (as isdoneforcybercharterschools)oruniversities,asmanyotherstatesdo,wouldincreasetheopportunitiesfornewandinnovativecharterschools.

Do parents want charter schools?SincecharterschoolswereestablishedinPennsylvaniain1997,theirenrollmentshaveskyrock-eted,demonstratingtheirpopularityamongfamilies.Parentsvaluetheabilitytochoosewheretoeducatetheirchildren.Today,thereare145charterschoolsserving91,000students.Theyinclude12cybercharterschoolswithalmost28,000students,andofferparentsanalternativetotheirlocaltraditionalpublicschools.

How are charter schools funded?Fundingforcharterschoolsfollowsstudentswholeaveaparticularschooldistrictandenrollinalocalcharterschool.Chartersreceiveaportionoftheper-studentspendingofthedistrictoforigin,whileschooldistrictsretaintherest.Onaverage,charterschoolsreceiveandspendonlyabout83percentofwhatschooldistrictsspendforeachstudent.Intotal,charterschoolsreceived$945millionin2009-10,about3.7percentoftotalpubliceducationspendinginthecommonwealth.

PA Charter School Enrollment

80,000

90,000

100,000

70,000

60,000

50,000

40,000

30,000

20,000

10,000

$01997-98 2001-02 2005-061998-99 2002-03 2006-071999-00 2003-04 2007-08 2009-102000-01 2004-05 2008-09

Source: Pennsylvania Department of Education, “Public School Enrollment Reports,”http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/community/enrollment/7407/public_enrollment_reports/620541.

2010-11

9825,563

11,413

18,981

28,45332,862

41,114

48,212

55,63059,976

67,275

73,054

79,167

90,616

Page 10: CF Fall Legislative Guide

Do charter schools drain public schools of desperately needed funding? Charterschoolsreceiveonlyafractionoftheper-studentfundingallocatedtopublicschools—3.7percentoftotalpublicschoolspending.Theportionthatpublicschoolsretain—forchildrentheynolongerhavetoeducate—effectivelyraisestheamounttheycandevotetoeachstudent,orcanbeusedtolowerlocalpropertytaxes.Forexample,thePhiladelphiaSchoolDistrictspent$13,272perstudentin2009-10.Thedistricthadtopay$8,184foreverynon-specialneedscharterschoolstudent,retaining$5,089foreverychilditwasnolongerresponsibleforeducating.

Eveniftwo-thirdsofstudentsleftforcharterschools,thedistrictwouldretain60percentoffundingtoserveone-thirdthenumberofchildren—drivingspendingperstudentto$22,200perstudentforthosewhoremaininthedistrict.

Are charter schools accountable? Charterschoolsareevaluatedbythesamestandardsasdistrictschools.Butunliketraditionalpublicschools,failingcharterschoolsrisklosingtheircharterandbeingshutdown.Publicschoolsshouldfacethesameaccountabil-itymeasurescharterschoolsdo—withaperformancecontractthatisregularlyreviewed,whichisusuallyeveryfiveyears.Moreover,chartersfacethehighestaccountabilitystandard—parentalchoice.Nocharterschoolgetsanyfundingunlessparentschooseitfortheirchild.

Total Public School Spending, 2009-10

School Districts

Charter Schools

Pennsylvania Department of Education,“2009-2010 Expenditure Data for AllLEAs,”http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/ community/summaries_of_annual_financial_ report_data/7673/afr_excel_data_files/509047

Page 11: CF Fall Legislative Guide

noteS

Page 12: CF Fall Legislative Guide

Matthew Brouillette, President and CEOEmail:[email protected]

Richard Dreyfuss, Senior Fellow for Pension & Health Care PolicyEmail:[email protected]

NathanBenefield,Director of Policy AnalysisEmail:[email protected]:Budget,Taxes,Education,Unions&CollectiveBargaining,Welfare

Hon. Robert O’Donnell, Senior Fellow for Education PolicyEmail:[email protected]

Priya Abraham, Senior Policy AnalystEmail:[email protected]:Unions&CollectiveBargaining,Charter&CyberSchools,EducationFunding

Hon. Jeff Coleman, Senior FellowEmail:[email protected]

Katrina Currie, Policy AnalystEmail:[email protected]:NaturalGas&Energy,LiquorStoresandPrivatization

Dawn Meling, Deputy Director of Public Affairs, Community LiaisonEmail:[email protected]

Elizabeth Stelle, Policy AnalystEmail:[email protected]:WelfareandMedicaid,NaturalGas&Energy,Privatization,Taxes

Jay Ostrich, Director of Public AffairsEmail:[email protected]

Pearre Deane, Deputy Director of Public Affairs, Legislative LiaisonEmail:[email protected]

coMMonwealth Foundation legiSlative contactS