Certificate of Title - Volume 6099 Folio 83 · Certificate of Title - Volume 6099 Folio 83 Parent Title(s) CT 5778/821 Creating Dealing(s) RTD 11802254 Title Issued 24/08/2012 Edition

  The Registrar-General certifies that this Title Register Search displays the recordsmaintained in the Register Book and other notations at the time of searching.

Certificate of Title - Volume 6099 Folio 83Parent Title(s) CT 5778/821

Creating Dealing(s) RTD 11802254

Title Issued 24/08/2012 Edition 1 Edition Issued 24/08/2012

Estate TypeFEE SIMPLE

Registered ProprietorDENISE ELIZABETH GILFILLAN

OF 36 MAIN NORTH ROAD WILLASTON SA 5118

Description of LandALLOTMENT 103 DEPOSITED PLAN 89090IN THE AREA NAMED WILLASTONHUNDRED OF MUDLA WIRRA

EasementsNIL

Schedule of DealingsNIL

NotationsDealings Affecting Title NIL

Priority Notices NIL

Notations on Plan NIL

Registrar-General's Notes NIL

Administrative Interests NIL

Product Register Search (CT 6099/83)

Date/Time 11/10/2017 12:16PM

Customer Reference Gilfillan

Order ID 20171011005887

Cost $28.25

Land Services Page 1 of 2

Copyright Privacy Disclaimer: www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showCopyright www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showPrivacyStatement www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showDisclaimer

Product Register Search (CT 6099/83)

Date/Time 11/10/2017 12:16PM

Customer Reference Gilfillan

Order ID 20171011005887

Cost $28.25

Land Services Page 2 of 2

Copyright Privacy Disclaimer: www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showCopyright www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showPrivacyStatement www.sailis.sa.gov.au/home/showDisclaimer

CEDAR

43.24

3.24

40.00

SCALE:1:100

D GILFILLAN

36 MAIN NORTH ROAD, WILLASTON SA

S2517

ADDITION/RENOVATIONS TO EXISTING BUILDING - CHANGE OF USE TO CONSULTING

17/11/2017

1:

of 04

Existing: 90.11

New Works: 17.12

Front Verandah: 16.75

Rear Verandah: 11.87

135.85

SOUTH-EAST ELEVATION

04

100 u.o.n

ELEVATIONS

m²

SOUTH-WEST ELEVATION

A3 Sheet

NORTH-WEST ELEVATION

NORTH-EAST ELEVATION

External wall cladding as selected.

Timber framed double hung

windows as selected.

External wall cladding

as selected.

Existing roof to remain.

New 900mm wide entry door

as selected.

Build new wall to toilet

& entry as required.

Build new wall to toilet

& entry as required.

Existing roof to remain.

Create parapet wall to entry.

Line with Scyon Matrix.

CEDAR

43.24

3.24

40.00

SCALE:1:100

D GILFILLAN

36 MAIN NORTH ROAD, WILLASTON SA

S2517

ADDITION/RENOVATIONS TO EXISTING BUILDING - CHANGE OF USE TO CONSULTING

17/11/2017

1:

of 04

Existing: 90.11

New Works: 17.12

Front Verandah: 16.75

Rear Verandah: 11.87

135.85

02

EXISTING/DEMOLITION LAYOUT & ELEVATIONS

m²

100 u.o.n

A3 Sheet

Remove existing bathroom/rear wall,

windows & slab as required.

Extent shown dashed.

VERANDAH

VERANDAH

BEDROOM

BEDROOM

LIVING

BEDROOM

KITCHEN

BATHROOM

SOUTH-WEST ELEVATION

NORTH-WEST ELEVATION

NORTH-EAST ELEVATION

Existing roof to remain.

Prop roof as required.

Extent of roof over to remain

Remove existing internal door

& jambs as required for accessible

access. Make good opening.

Remove existing window.

Keep for possible reuse.

Remove existing door & window.

Prepare opening for new window.

Remove existing kitchen cupboards.

Remove existing door & window.

Prepare opening for new window.

Remove existing bathroom/rear wall,

windows & slab as required.

Extent shown dashed.

Existing roof to remain.

Prop roof as required.

Remove existing window.

Keep for possible reuse.

Create opening in existing wall.

Provide lintel over as required.

Prepare for new door.

Make good opening.

CEDAR

43.24

3.24

40.00

SCALE:1:100

D GILFILLAN

36 MAIN NORTH ROAD, WILLASTON SA

S2517

ADDITION/RENOVATIONS TO EXISTING BUILDING - CHANGE OF USE TO CONSULTING

17/11/2017

1:

of 04

Existing: 90.11

New Works: 17.12

Front Verandah: 16.75

Rear Verandah: 11.87

135.85

03

100 u.o.n

PROPOSED FLOOR LAYOUT

m² A3 Sheet

209090

2180

CONSULTATION 2

CONSULTATION 1

RECEPTION

CONSULTATION 3

KITCHEN

ENTRY

ACCESSIBLE

WC

Broom/pantry

Fridge

hot plate

Sink

d/w

wm

Pan

90

0

90

0

m/w over

Basin

90

27

00

90

26

40

39

40

External wall cladding as selected.

Timber framed double hung

windows as selected.

New 900mm wide entry door

as selected.

Create parapet wall to entry.

Line with Scyon Matrix.

Build new wall to toilet

& entry as required.

Existing roof to remain.

Install new kitchen.

Kitchen cupboard layout to

owner's selection & to joiner's

specification

Provide new floor to kitchen, entry & accessible wc.

Finished floor level to match main building floor

level. (New slab to WC, self levelling topping to

kitchen/entry)

VERANDAH

VERANDAH

90

900

Provide new door to

new opening.

hws

380090

1710

Basin

vanity

Provide new basin to

consultation 3.

Ex

it

Ex

it

fe

fe

fe

fb

Exit

fe

FHR

fb

Combined emergency lighting and exit light

connected to mains power, with additional 9 volt battery

powered back up, fixed to ceiling.

All doors in path of egress must be operable without a key.

Combined emergency and exit light complying with AS2293.1

Emergency pin light with 9 volt battery back up..

2.4Kg 'all round' dry chemical portable fire extinguisher

(Note: This extinguisher may cause damage to computer

or similar electronic equipment) ..........or

3.4Kg Co² portable fire extinguisher.

Fire Blanket

Fire Hose reel

Fire hazard properties: General requirements.

Any material or component used in this building must -

a) in the case of sarking type material, have a flammability

index not more than 5; or

b) in the case of other materials have -

(i) a spread-of-flame index not more than 9; and

(ii) a smoke-developed index not more than 8 if the

spread-of-flame index is more than 5 or

c) be completely covered on all faces by concrete or masonry

not less than 50mm thick; or

d) in the case of a composite member or assembly, be constructed

so that when assembled as proposed in a building-

(i) any material which does not comply with a) or b) is protected

on all sides and edges from exposure to the air; and

(ii) the member or assembly, when tested in accordance with the

specification A2.4, has a smoke-developed index and spread-of-flame

index not exceeding those prescribed in b) above; and

(iii) the member or assembly retains the protection in position so

that it prevents ignition of the material and continues to screen

it from access to free air for a period of not less than 10 minutes.

CEDAR

43.24

3.24

40.00

SCALE:1:100

D GILFILLAN

36 MAIN NORTH ROAD, WILLASTON SA

S2517

ADDITION/RENOVATIONS TO EXISTING BUILDING - CHANGE OF USE TO CONSULTING

22/01/2018

1:

of 04

Existing: 90.11

New Works: 17.12

Front Verandah: 16.75

Rear Verandah: 11.87

135.85

A: Site plan amendments in response to council queries

01

200 u.o.n

SITE PLAN

m²

M

A

I

N

N

O

R

T

H

R

O

A

D

Existing

Building

Drive

(permeable surface)

Proposed entry& rebuilt bathroom.

Extent shown hatched

SITE PLAN

Discharge Stormwater into Existing rainwater tanks

through 90mm diamater stormwater class upvc pipes.

Discharge overflow to street water table.

74.22m

CT 6099/83

Lot 103 Deposited Plan 89090

In the Area Named WILLASTON

Hundred of MUDLA WIRRA

A

A3 Sheet

18

.1

9m

Existing trees to remain

1

3

.

5

5

m

61.12m

Create accessible carpark

& associated shared space

as per AS2890.6

1

4

.

8

0

m

1

2

.0

6

m

6

0

0

0

48

00

58

00

48

00

2400

New rainwater tank with pump to catch roof stormwater.

Connect to toilet cistern, to office. Discharge overflow into

stormwater system.

Existing sewer run, connected to town effluent.

Landscaping Specie Selection

Rhagodia parabolica 1-2m Saltbush

Acacia notabilis 3-6m Wattle

Acacia sclerophylla 1-2m Wattle

Rytidosperma species 0.6m Wallaby Grass

Existing crossover to remain.

Fo

otp

ath

Footpath

Veran

dah

Footpath

Carpark

54

00

16

00

Proposed landscaping using

native/indiginous species.

R

e

d

g

u

m

c

i

r

=

4

.

5

m

S

u

g

a

r

g

u

m

c

i

r

=

3

.

0

m

S

u

g

a

r

g

u

m

c

i

r

=

1

.

2

5

m

Bicycle parking

+

9

8

.

1

6

T

O

K

+

9

8

.

3

3

+

9

8

.

5

2

+

9

8

.

1

8

5

+

9

8

.

3

3

5

+

9

8

.

8

6

+

9

9

.

6

8

+

9

9

.

6

8

+

9

8

.

9

6

+

9

8

.

4

9

+

9

9

.

5

4

+

9

9

.

9

9

P

L

+

1

0

0

.

0

0

F

L

+

9

9

.

2

4

+

9

9

.

7

9

5

+

9

9

.

7

2

5

Existing tree to be retained.

(Small Car)

1000

Grade carpark

& drive at 1:20

Proposed swale to catch

catch stormwater run off.

Proposed swale to catch

catch stormwater run off.

Car Parking Surface Selection

Ecotrihex 97.0% permeable

Geohex 99.7% permeable

Cut Existing tree to be removed.

(shown dashed)

Wheelie Bin storage

Dear James,

Thankyou for your response to the planning submission for 36 Main North Road Willaston. Apologies the requested information was not contained within the first submission. Please find more detailed information regarding the development below, along with some questions and clarifications sought on certain points.

1) It is noted that two significant trees are located near the front property boundary adjacent to the proposed access point.

An arborist report demonstrating that the proposal (including any earthworks, car parking surface and formalising the existing crossover) will not detrimentally impact on the heath of the Significant Trees is required. Please note that the arborist report provided will be reviewed by Councils independent arborist

The care of these two trees has been at the forefront of our minds when planning the car parking area, whilst meeting the car parking requirements set out in the Gawler Development Plan, and standards set out in AS 2890. We have, as far as possible, prevented placing car parks under the canopy of the 2 trees to limit root disruption and compaction. We note each requirement that further pushes car parks towards the trees is likely to create more damage to them. This is discussed further on in regards to the 1m reversing indentation requested from the engineers for the north-western car park.

The driveway alignment is unavoidable based on the Titles alignment and location of the trees, however we have thoroughly investigated surfacing options for the car park, as the choice of surface will influence the health of the trees long term. This again is discussed further on under the relevant point.

During all works the owners will be on site to ensure the trees are not damaged. All works will occur from the neighbouring site, limiting the number of trucks and earth works that need to come between the trees. Sub-base preparation will occur to ensure permeability but limit the depth of digging required inline with the requirements of each permeable paving solution. We can provide council with details of this preparation. We have liaised with Water Sensitive SA re options and visited display permeable paving sites. We have also talked with multiple pavers with experience laying permeable paving. Geohex, the company to provide one solution has also been helpful and is interested in supporting the project to create a display option in SA for their environmentally sustainable car parking solution. Our aim is also to raise the level of the driveway between the trees to limit excavation at this point.

We are happy to have an arborist provide a report if required. However, as discussed throughout this document, we believe we are catering for the needs of these significant trees in the proposed development, and have put in considerable research to limit root disruption by understanding permeable options. Under these circumstances, we question if an arborists report is required? Please refer further on for more information on the car parking surface.

2) The proposal is listed as a Category 2 form of development within Principle of Development Control 35 of the Mixed Use Historic (Conservation) Zone. Accordingly, an additional fee of $107.00 is required to be paid in order to facilitate the Category 2 public notification process and will take an additional 2 weeks.

On reading the development regulations we understand this to be the case and will forward the additional fee as soon as possible to help with moving the application along

3) The proposal seeks to change the nature of movement through an existing access point to an existing arterial road (State Government owned road). In accordance with Schedule 8, 3 (b) of the Development Regulations 2008, a referral to the Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure is required to be undertaken. This requires an additional fee of $222.00 to be paid in order to commence this process and can take up to a period of 4 weeks for Council to receive comments.

Could you please clarify. From our reading of the Development Regulations Schedule 8, 3 (b) complying development does not require a referral to DPTI? In progressing this development, we have at all times worked within the requirements of the Gawler Development Plan for the Mixed Use Historic (conservation) Zone, including proposed usage, car parking and retention of the heritage value of the area including the cottage on this site. We are surprised the development has therefore been classified as non-complying and requires a referral to DPTI. Unless we are misreading the regulations?

The existing driveway was agreed to by DPTI at the time the new roundabout was built. We understand the movements are due to change through this driveway, however, do not read the regulations to require a referral to DPTI.

4) Written statement detailing: a) The proposed use of the site (i.e. physiotherapy, doctor, dentist etc) and

whether you are aware of any tenants intending to lease the building. b) Days and hours of operation. c) Maximum number of staff working on-site at any given time. d) The expected number of customers on-site at any given time. e) How waste is proposed to be managed on-site (e.g. regular kerb side

collection). f) Clarification of the largest vehicle to access/service the site (e.g.. Medium

Rigid Vehicle - delivery vehicles). g) Clarification of deliveries (e.g. frequency, duration and time of deliveries). h) Whether any signage is proposed. i) Whether any new fencing is proposed.

Please note that any signage or new fencing will be required to be shown on the Site Plan with an accompanying Elevation Plan.

The proposed land use of the site is Consulting Rooms, such as a physio, massage therapist or speech therapist. Car parking has been provided for this land use. Alternatively, the site may be used as an office for a lawyer, tax agent or real estate firm, for example. Approval is therefore sought for Consulting Rooms and Offices. There is no tenant at this stage.

Operation hours would be standard working hours Monday to Friday, 9am – 5pm, and potentially Saturdays.

Maximum staff would be 4.

The maximum number of expected customers on site at any given time is 6 (2 per consulting room. One in with the professional and one in the waiting room). This is an absolute maximum and unlikely to eventuate as all 3 rooms are unlikely to each have a practicing consultant. It is more likely to have 2 active consulting rooms and the third room in use for another purpose such as storage or meeting space.

Waste will be collected via council’s kerb side collection. Wheelie bins will be stored at the rear of the property.

The Largest vehicle will be a delivery van.

It is expected deliveries may occur twice a week, during office hours. It is assumed deliveries will be by van, a carparking space can be used for this.

An application for signage will be the responsibility of the tenant

No new fencing is planned at this stage. Once a tenant is in place this may change, at which time, if necessary, an application will be made to council. The street fencing will remain.

5) Stormwater management plan showing: a) Details as per the Site Plan. b) Existing and proposed site levels for the car parking area. c) Stormwater management (including stormwater detention) for the proposed car parking

area. See below d) Clarification of the proposed surface for the car parking area.

Please note that Councils Engineering Department have requested that the proposed car parking area be sealed. Due to the constraints associated with the Significant trees located at the front of the site, permeable paving or a suitable alternative in line with the recommendations of the an arborist will be required.

Existing levels added. The carpark will grade to front boundary at 1:20 as indicated on plan. The environmental footprint of the proposed car park has been forefront of mind because of the value of the 2 significant trees on site. After considerable investigation, and reading of the Gawler Development plan and State-wide policy including the 30-Year Plan for

Greater Adelaide, in regards to environmental initiatives and water sensitivity, a fully permeable surface is proposed for the car park which includes: Geohex – a 99% permeable solution combining strong plastic moulding with gravel to create a permeable surface while eliminating the issues gravel car parking surfaces can create. For specifications see http://www.geohex.com.au/specifications.aspx This solution is proposed for the car parking area, except at the driveway entry and where the driveway continues under the canopy of the 2 large trees. As leaf litter will frequently drop here, and cars will enter on and off the road, permeable pavers are proposed for this area. Landscaping and edging will create an appealing design. Ecotrihex pavers – a stylish paver with 97% water permeability. The car park will have this paver from the road along the driveway to just past the tree canopy. This paver is considerably more expensive, as is the laying of it, making it cost prohibitive to lay the entire 300m2 of car parking area. The stormwater runoff will not increase and therefore no detention requirements are applicable.

You have indicated that council requests a sealed car parking surface, however, I believe the permeable paving that is proposed here should be favourably considered. It allows water to penetrate and will not put pressure on the existing stormwater system.

This environmental solution is in line with council’s objectives and PDC’s as set out in the Gawler Development Plan under Natural Resources, including those requiring water sensitive urban design. It also assists council to meet Objective 21: “A sustainable urban form that reduces the ecological footprint of the town, whilst also enhancing the quality of life of residents” and PDC 28 “ Urban development should be confined to areas within the urban boundary of Metropolitan Adelaide and be based on principles of ecologically sustainable development (ESD) that includes water sensitive urban design (WSUD), energy efficiency, biodiversity protection and enhancement, natural resource protection, waste, minimisation, indoor and outdoor environmental quality and sustainable selection and use of materials.”

Alternative eco solutions like this should be encouraged and we hope looked upon favourably by council.

e) Councils engineering staff have raised concerns with the manoeuvrability of the north

western-most car parking space (identified in yellow on the attached plan). A 1 metre indented turn around area is required to be incorporated into the northern end of the car parking area (see attached annotated plan for clarification).

We have attached a version of a plan with this in place. However, we have concerns about this proposal for a number of reasons: 1. It pushes the car parks further towards the significant trees root zone (500mm), and

increases the total area of the car park which is already considerable (this will reduce the land available to provide landscaping, and swales for water catchment).

2. It reduces the width of the footpath, prioritising vehicular traffic over safe and easy pedestrian movements.

Alternatively, we propose: - That the car parked in this parking space does have sufficient space to reverse then turn

out. The driveway here is wider (6m) (wider than the required space). The disability shared area will also have additional space that the vehicle can reverse into with the bollard set back slightly from the end of the car park.

- If the engineers are not happy with this the park could be classified as a Staff Car Park. This would require only one movement in and one movement out in a day.

- We could also investigate, if these options are not suitable, making the two north western most car parks longer. Currently there is a 1m garden space then 600 overhang at the front of these two car parks (similar to the disability parks on the other side). We could reduce the garden space and bring the overhang forward as deemed necessary by the engineers. This would allow the car parked in the first car park additional space to reverse directly backwards and then turn to move out.

f. Vehicle turning circles for the north western-most car parking space.

6) Amended Site Plan showing: a) Any changes incurred as a result of the abovementioned points.

b. Location of areas for waste storage. c. Location of areas for deliveries.

d) Provide the species symbol in the Legend that relates to the planting locations indicated on the site plan (e.g. which symbol relates to which plant species).

e) Remove all landscaping from the 600mm vehicle overhang area of all car parking spaces (see attached annotated plan for clarification).

f. Indicate the Sugar Gum (cir = 1.25m) to the west of the car parking area to be removed as this tree will restrict vehicle overhang (see attached annotated plan for clarification).

Our wish is to keep this tree to assist with the overall design appeal of the car parking area, maintain local flora and fauna, and assist with shading of the car parking space. This is in line with the Gawler Development plan: centres and shops PDC 26 (m), natural resources objective 48, biodiversity and vegetation PDC 152 and 153, and Vehicle parking PDC 346 (j) and PDC 351.

We understand the tensions with engineering requirements and propose the following: the space be classified and signed as a small car only car park.

The tree is a small gum variety, its common name being a Bushy Sugar Gum (Eucalyptus cladocalyx ‘Nana’). It is not expected to grow any larger. It currently has a trunk radius of 200mm with the centre of the trunk located 1000mm from the boundary. It therefore

intrudes 200mm into the 600mm overhang space. This leaves a car parking space of 4800 plus an overhang of 400mm (or 200mm in actuality if allowing a space so the cars do not hit the tree trunk). The car park is therefore 5000mm in length, as required by the national standards.

As we have 10 car parks in total, allowing one small car park is only 10% of the total car parks, a nationally accepted standard.

The permeable parking surface will allow water to permeate to the trees root zone and maintain its health. We look forward to working with council to ensure the overall design of this car park supports the requirements in the Gawler Development Plan to promote atheistically pleasing urban design outcomes and environmental considerations.

Thank you for your time in reading this response. We looking forward to further engagement with council. We are open to all questions and happy to talk through any options.