CENTER FOR RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION IN EARLY CHILDHOOD Utah Conference on Effective Practices for Teachers and Human Service Professionals: Interventions Across the Lifespan Utah State University, Logan UT, June 23, 2011 Response to Intervention (RTI) with Infants/Toddlers Early Communication (Break Out #1) Charles R. Greenwood and Judith J. Carta Juniper Gardens Children‟s Project, University of Kansas
45
Embed
CENTER FOR RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION IN EARLY … · CENTER FOR RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION IN EARLY CHILDHOOD ... Juniper Gardens Children‟s Project, ... The Total Communication Score
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
CENTER FOR
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION IN EARLY CHILDHOOD
Utah Conference on Effective Practices for Teachers and Human Service Professionals:
Interventions Across the Lifespan
Utah State University, Logan UT, June 23, 2011
Response to Intervention
(RTI) with Infants/Toddlers
Early Communication
(Break Out #1)
Charles R. Greenwood and
Judith J. Carta
Juniper Gardens Children‟s Project,
University of Kansas
Today’s Presentation
This presentation discusses what we have learned developing a
measure of children‟s growth in early communication skills for
practitioners during the 6 to 42 of age.
Data are presented showing the dynamic patterns of changes in
early skills in reference to more complex skills over time
The RTI approach developed by the authors for screening, risk, and
intervention decision making is described using the measure.
Results of a Tier 2 language interventions implemented by Early
Head Start home visitors and parents are presented.
Implications for child care and early intervention are discussed.
An RTI approach requires tools that
support evidence-based practice?
Access to measures of short-term growth and development that can be used for
universal screening of all children
progress monitoring for children receiving interventions in a decision-making model
Access to effective, feasible interventions for use in Tier 1, 2, and 3 services
Access to professional development and decision making support enabling implementation
Development of measures of short-term
growth in early communication skills for
infants and toddlers
A major limitation to the RTI approach in early childhood is lack of validity measure of short-term growth that practitioners can use to determine a child‟s response to intervention
In 2002, we began work to develop such measures
Carta, J. J., Greenwood, C. R., Walker, D., & Buzhardt, J. (2010). Using IGDIs: Monitoring progress and improving intervention results for infants and young children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Language to Literacy
Connection: Domains
Infant/Toddler Preschool (PreK) Early Elementary (K-3)
Early Language and
Communication
Language and Early
Literacy
Early Literacy and Reading
Prelinquistic Language Phonological Awareness Phonological Awareness
Oral Language Alphabet Knowledge Alphabetic Principle
Quick indicators of children's growth toward socially valued outcomes
Inform intervention decision making
Focus on key skill indicators rather than wide-band comprehensive skills
Other Common
“Indicators” Height/weight
Charts
Thermometer
•Quick and easy
•Relatively inexpensive
•Repeatable
•Indicates potential problem
and effectiveness of an
intervention
One Child’s Growth Chart
Developmental Trajectory
Approach
Early Head Start Normative Samples
(8% with IFSPs)
2006 N = 1480 Children
2010 N = 5883 Children, 26 programs in 2
states
ECI Mean Growth
Trajectories
ECI Total Communication
Trajectories for 26 EHS Programs
Greenwood, C. R., Buzhardt, J., Walker, D., Howard, W. J., &
Anderson, R. (In press). Program-level influences on the
measurement of early communication for infants and toddlers in
Early Head Start. Journal of Early Intervention.
ECI Key Skills Trajectories
Greenwood, C. R., Walker, D., & Buzhardt, J. (2010). The Early Communication Indicator (ECI) for infants and toddlers: Early Head Start growth norms from two states. Journal of Early Intervention, 32(5), 310-334.
ECI Key Skills by IFSP Status
Access to effective, feasible
interventions for use in Tier 1, 2, and 3
services
Examples: Commenting and Labeling
Parents Implementing
Commenting and Labeling
Teachers Implementing
Commenting and Labeling
Evidence of Effectiveness
References
Buzhardt, J., Greenwood, C. R., Walker, D., Anderson, R., Howard, W., & Carta, J. J. (in press). Effects of web-based support on Early Head Start home visitors‟ use of evidence-based intervention decision making and growth in children‟s expressive communication. National Head Start Association Dialog: A Research-to-Practice Journal for the Early Childhood Field.
Buzhardt, J., Walker, D., Greenwood, C., & Carta, J. (in press). A study of an online tool to support evidence-based practices with infants and toddlers (Research-to-Practice Summary). National Head Start Association (NHSA) Dialog: A Research-to-Practice Journal for the Early Childhood Field.
Access to professional development and
decision making support enabling
implementation
IGDI Website:
www.igdi.ku.edu
Publicly accessible material
IGDI descriptions
Materials needed for implementation
Scoring definitions
Scoring sheets
Administration checklists
Toys for administration
Psychometric properties
Training and certification resources
Intervention materials
Contact information
Online data system (password-
protected)
Data management
Web-based certification
Assessor management
Child rosters and demographics
Program-wide aggregated
reports
Data-based intervention
decision making tools (MOD)
Current Data System and MOD
Use IGDI Online data system use
Over 32,000 assessments entered into the data system
Over 11,000 infants and toddlers assessed
Approximately 1,100 user accounts (certified assessors, program
directors, data entry personnel, trainees, etc.)
Usage covers 22 states and three countries
MOD currently being tested in a limited number of midwestern
Early Head Start and Part C programs
Five Kansas Early Head Start programs currently using the MOD
Iowa Heartland Area Agency (Part C)
Online Certification Training
Web-Site Data Entry
Customizable Dynamic Reports
Individual Child Report
1. All data for single child
2. Total communication and Key Skill graphs
Program Report
1. Assessor info
2. Demographic summary of children in program
3. Info about ECI assessments conducted
4. Summary of children‟s communication proficiency
5. Graphs of average rate of total comm. and key skills
Project Report
Similar to program, but across ALL programs
OSEP Report
Information relevant to programs that need to report progress on specific OSEP outcomes
Graphs and Reports that Support
Data-based Decision Making
Base level support…
Progress Monitoring Graphs
Weighted Total Communication
Key Skill Elements
Program Reports
Identify children falling below benchmark
Identify children due for an assessment
Individual Child Reports
Child‟s Data
Summary
Child‟s Data Table
Individual Child Report
Critical child progress
information available
immediately upon login. (Only
available to program
directors/coordinators.)
Children due for an assessment
Instant
Progress
Monitoring
Information
Additional Support: Making
Online Decisions (MOD) System
Automate identification of low-performing children
Document decision making progress within the data
system
Intervention(s) used
Work with caregivers on implementing intervention
strategies
Caregiver intervention implementation
Intervention changes
Analysis of child’s response to the intervention
Is It Being Done?
The completed First Fidelity Checklist is entered
into the MOD
Provide caregiver with “Caregiver Checklist” if you
think he/she will complete it
Tilley’s Decision-making Model
We used Tilley‟s
decision making
model so that
children below
benchmark
receive more
intensive home
language services
sooner when
needed according
to the ECI
Making Online
Decisions (MOD)
Summary of MOD Steps
1) Entry into the MOD requires a valid ECI at least slightly below benchmark
2) Answer questions about any recent changes in the child‟s environment or medical issues
3) Child receives monthly ECIs
4) MOD recommends strategies tied to child‟s current language proficiency
5) Home visitor and caregiver(s) identify strategies most appropriate for family
6) Complete First and Follow-up checklists and enter them into MOD system
7) MOD monitors child‟s language progress
8) Home visitor continues to work with caregiver to identify what strategies are working and which ones are not
Is It Being Done?
On subsequent home visits, discuss the strategies with
caregiver(s)
How much are they using the strategies?
Which ones do they like the most?
Are they having trouble using them?
Are they noticing any language improvement?
Complete the Follow-up Checklist
Enter checklist into MOD
Is It Working?
Three ECI‟s after the caregiver(s) receive the
recommendations…
MOD analyzes ECI performance
1. ECI before and after the recommendations were provided