CCRBAnnual Appendix 2013

8/12/2019 CCRBAnnual Appendix 2013

1/121

APPENDIX A

CCRB COMPLAINT DATA

2013


2/121

Table 1A: Total Allegations and Total Comp laints Received 2009-2013

Number

Percent of

Total Number

Percent of

Total Number

Percent of

Total Number

Percent of

Total Number

Percent of

Total

Force (F) 6,404 30.0% 5,301 29.8% 4,832 29.4% 4,708 29.41% 5,303 31.80%

Abuse of Authority (A) 10,549 49.4% 8,678 48.8% 7,953 48.3% 7,860 49.11% 8,204 49.20%

Discourtesy (D) 3,828 17.9% 3,308 18.6% 3,152 19.1% 2,929 18.30% 2,675 16.04%

Offensive Language (O) 589 2.8% 514 2.9% 523 3.2% 509 3.18% 493 2.96%

Total Allegations 21,370 100% 17,801 100% 16,460 100% 16,006 100% 16,675 100%

Total Complaints 7,660 6,466 5,969 5,741 5,410

201120102009 2012 2013


3/121

Table 1B: Types of Allegations in Complaints Received 2009-2013

Number

Percent of

Total Number

Percent of

Total Number

Percent of

Total Number

Percent of

Total Number

Percent of

Total

Force (F) 3,984 52.0% 3,225 49.9% 2,891 48.4% 2,847 49.6% 2,874 53.1%

Abuse of Authority (A) 4,858 63.4% 3,999 61.8% 3,608 60.4% 3,506 61.1% 3,136 58.0%

Discourtesy (D) 3,172 41.4% 2,698 41.7% 2,549 42.7% 2,384 41.5% 2,065 38.2%

Offensive Language (O) 554 7.2% 467 7.2% 459 7.7% 453 7.9% 421 7.8%

Total Complaints 7,660 6,466 5,969 5,741 5,410

20112009 2010 2012

* This table presents the number of complaints containing one or more allegations in each FADO allegation. For example, 2,874 of the 5,410 complaints

received in 2013 contained one or more force allegations, while 3,136 contained one or more abuse of authority allegations.

2013


4/121

Table 1C: Total Intake, 2009-2013

Number

Percent of

Total Number

Percent of

Total Number

Percent of

Total Number

Percent of

Total Number

Percent of

Total

Complaints within CCRB jurisdiction 7,660 40.1% 6,466 38.0% 5,969 37.1% 5,741 39.2% 5,410 47.0%

Referrals to Office of the Chief of

Department 9,500 49.8% 8,634 50.7% 8,185 50.9% 7,261 49.5% 5,008 43.5%

Referrals to Internal Affairs Bureau 1,626 8.5% 1,716 10.1% 1,739 10.8% 1,452 9.9% 912 7.9%

Referrals to Other Agencies 305 1.6% 218 1.3% 189 1.2% 203 1.4% 171 1.5%

Total Intake 19,091 100% 17,034 100% 16,082 100% 14,657 100% 11,501 100%

20122009 2010 2011 2013


5/121

Table 2: Distribution of Force Allegations 2009-2013

Number

Percent of

Total Number

Percent of

Total Number

Percent of

Total Number

Percent of

Total Number

Percent of

Total

Animal 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 0.1% 1 0.0% 2 0.0%

Gun fired 24 0.4% 20 0.4% 22 0.5% 10 0.2% 10 0.2%

Gun pointed 313 4.9% 304 5.7% 285 5.9% 280 5.9% 312 5.9%

Nightstick as club 364 5.7% 301 5.7% 253 5.2% 222 4.7% 205 3.9%

Gun club 33 0.5% 25 0.5% 33 0.7% 22 0.5% 22 0.4%

Police shield 15 0.2% 8 0.2% 8 0.2% 7 0.1% 11 0.2%Vehicle 26 0.4% 28 0.5% 27 0.6% 25 0.5% 42 0.8%

Other blunt instrument 54 0.8% 44 0.8% 56 1.2% 58 1.2% 47 0.9%

Hit against inanimate object 183 2.9% 134 2.5% 145 3.0% 143 3.0% 259 4.9%

Chokehold 244 3.8% 216 4.1% 162 3.4% 167 3.5% 233 4.4%

Pepper spray 342 5.3% 286 5.4% 281 5.8% 208 4.4% 198 3.7%

Physical force 4612 72.0% 3794 71.6% 3415 70.7% 3419 72.6% 3695 69.7%

Radio as club 46 0.7% 26 0.5% 30 0.6% 23 0.5% 23 0.4%

Flashlight as club 11 0.2% 11 0.2% 20 0.4% 18 0.4% 8 0.2%

Handcuffs too tight 71 1.1% 44 0.8% 47 1.0% 42 0.9% 74 1.4%

Nonlethal 30 0.5% 31 0.6% 25 0.5% 36 0.8% 52 1.0%

Other (Force) 36 0.6% 29 0.5% 18 0.4% 27 0.6% 110 2.1%Total 6,404 100.0% 5,301 100.0% 4,832 100.0% 4,708 100.0% 5,303 100.0%

* "Physical force" includes: dragged/pulled, pushed/shoved/threw, punched/kicked/kneed, slapped and bit.

201320122010 2011Type of Force Allegation

2009


6/121

Table 3: Distribution of Abuse of Authority Allegations 2009-2013

Number

Percent

of Total Number

Percent

of Total Number

Percent

of Total Number

Percent

of Total Number

Percent

of Total

Vehicle search 529 5.0% 479 5.5% 401 5.0% 473 6.0% 533 6.5%

Strip search 236 2.2% 217 2.5% 233 2.9% 237 3.0% 258 3.1%

Vehicle stop 485 4.6% 341 3.9% 309 3.9% 327 4.2% 494 6.0%

Gun drawn 155 1.5% 155 1.8% 118 1.5% 121 1.5% 123 1.5%

Premises entered or searched 880 8.3% 740 8.5% 735 9.2% 818 10.4% 823 10.0%

Threat to notify ACS 49 0.5% 55 0.6% 54 0.7% 34 0.4% 42 0.5%

Threat of force 709 6.7% 579 6.7% 514 6.5% 519 6.6% 452 5.5%

Seizure of property 82 0.8% 41 0.5% 36 0.5% 30 0.4% 74 0.9%

Threat to damage/seize property 81 0.8% 47 0.5% 52 0.7% 60 0.8% 74 0.9%

Threat of arrest 1,054 10.0% 766 8.8% 722 9.1% 706 9.0% 730 8.9%

Threat of summons 74 0.7% 61 0.7% 33 0.4% 41 0.5% 49 0.6%

Property damaged 297 2.8% 179 2.1% 136 1.7% 213 2.7% 255 3.1%

Refusal to process civilian complaint 118 1.1% 61 0.7% 92 1.2% 84 1.1% 68 0.8%

Refusal to provide name and/or shield number 1,009 9.6% 913 10.5% 773 9.7% 762 9.7% 733 8.9%

Retaliatory arrest 16 0.2% 12 0.1% 14 0.2% 3 0.0% 7 0.1%

Retaliatory summons 49 0.5% 40 0.5% 34 0.4% 23 0.3% 44 0.5%

Refusal to obtain medical treatment 168 1.6% 142 1.6% 142 1.8% 152 1.9% 234 2.9%

Improper dissemination of medical information 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Refusal to show search warrant 75 0.7% 57 0.7% 45 0.6% 64 0.8% 74 0.9%

Other (Abuse) 94 0.9% 54 0.6% 40 0.5% 38 0.5% 42 0.5%

Frisk 727 6.9% 671 7.7% 704 8.9% 657 8.4% 637 7.8%Search (of person) 1,418 13.4% 1,290 14.9% 1,135 14.3% 1,038 13.2% 953 11.6%

Stop 1,857 17.6% 1,555 17.9% 1,444 18.2% 1,292 16.4% 1,270 15.5%

Question 385 3.6% 223 2.6% 186 2.3% 168 2.1% 235 2.9%

Total 10,549 100% 8,678 100% 7,953 100% 7,860 100% 8,204 100%

20132011 2012

Type of Abuse of Authority Allegation

2009 2010


7/121

Table 4: Distribut ion of Discourtesy Allegations 2009-2013

Number

Percent

of Total Number

Percent

of Total Number

Percent

of Total Number

Percent

of Total Number

Percent

of Total

Word 3,585 93.7% 3,121 94.3% 2,956 93.8% 2,761 94.3% 2,446 91.4%

Gesture 34 0.9% 36 1.1% 30 1.0% 25 0.9% 29 1.1%

Demeanor/tone 9 0.2% 10 0.3% 3 0.1% 3 0.1% 13 0.5%

Action 198 5.2% 140 4.2% 160 5.1% 137 4.7% 181 6.8%

Other (Discourtesy) 2 0.1% 1 0.0% 3 0.1% 3 0.1% 6 0.2%

Total 3,828 100% 3,308 100% 3,152 100% 2,929 100% 2,675 100%

2010 2011

Type of DiscourtesyAllegation

2009 2012 2013


8/121

Table 5: Distribution of Offensive Language Allegations 2009-2013

Number

Percent

of Total Number

Percent

of Total Number

Percent

of Total Number

Percent

of Total Number

Percent

of Total

Race 326 55.3% 275 53.5% 272 52.0% 290 57.0% 259 52.5%Ethnicity 90 15.3% 88 17.1% 81 15.5% 61 12.0% 59 12.0%

Religion 13 2.2% 16 3.1% 10 1.9% 15 2.9% 10 2.0%

Sex 66 11.2% 65 12.6% 78 14.9% 56 11.0% 72 14.6%

Physical disability 7 1.2% 2 0.4% 7 1.3% 8 1.6% 15 3.0%

Sexual orientation 76 12.9% 54 10.5% 54 10.3% 65 12.8% 56 11.4%

Other (Offensive) 11 1.9% 14 2.7% 21 4.0% 14 2.8% 22 4.5%

Total 589 100% 514 100% 523 100% 509 100% 493 100%

Type of Offensive

Language Allegation

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013


9/121

Table 6: Where Civili an Complaints Were Repor ted 2009-2013

NumberPercentof Total Number

Percentof Total Number



Percentof Total

CCRB 4,630 60.4% 3,774 58.4% 3,675 61.6% 3,314 57.7% 2,615 48.3%

NYPD 3,015 39.4% 2,683 41.5% 2,280 38.2% 2,411 42.0% 2,781 51.4%

Other 15 0.2% 9 0.1% 14 0.2% 16 0.3% 14 0.3%

Total 7,660 100% 6,466 100% 5,969 100% 5,741 100% 5,410 100%

201320122010 2011Where Civilian

Complaints WereReported

2009


10/121

Table 7A: How Complaints Filed wi th the CCRB Were Reported 2009-2013

NumberPercentof Total Number




Percentof Total

In person 178 3.8% 137 3.6% 136 3.7% 130 3.9% 144 5.5%

By telephone 3,998 86.3% 3,190 84.5% 3,008 81.9% 2,522 76.1% 1,796 68.7%

By mail/fax 124 2.7% 58 1.5% 67 1.8% 75 2.3% 87 3.3%

Electronically 330 7.1% 389 10.3% 464 12.6% 587 17.7% 588 22.5%

Total 4,630 100% 3,774 100% 3,675 100% 3,314 100% 2,615 100%

201320122010 2011How Complaints Filed

with the CCRB WereReported

2009


11/121

Table 7B: How Complaints Filed with the NYPD Were Reported 2009-2013

Number

Percent

of Total Number

Percent

of Total Number

Percent

of Total Number

Percent

of Total Number

Percent

of Total

In person 78 2.6% 88 3.3% 83 3.6% 119 4.9% 74 2.7%By telephone 2,916 96.7% 2,574 95.9% 2,182 95.7% 2,272 94.2% 2,677 96.3%

By letter 15 0.5% 14 0.5% 8 0.4% 10 0.4% 9 0.3%

By e-mail/internet/fax 6 0.2% 7 0.3% 7 0.3% 10 0.4% 21 0.8%

Total 3,015 100% 2,683 100% 2,280 100% 2,411 100% 2,781 100%

201320122010 2011How Complaints Filed

with the NYPD Were

Reported

2009


12/121

Table 8: Race of Alleged Victim s Compared to New York City Demographi cs 2009-2013

Race Number

Percent

of

Subtotal Number

Percent

of

Subtotal Number

Percent

of

Subtotal Number

Percent

of

Subtotal Number

Percent

of

Subtotal Number

Percent

of

Subtotal

White 896 12.3% 736 11.6% 726 12.1% 741 12.7% 629 12.9% 3,728 12.3% 35.1%

Black 4,154 56.9% 3,718 58.5% 3,369 56.1% 3,279 56.3% 2678 55.0% 17,198 56.7% 23.4%

Latino 1,940 26.6% 1,598 25.2% 1,603 26.7% 1,490 25.6% 1281 26.3% 7,912 26.1% 27.5%

Asian 162 2.2% 127 2.0% 131 2.2% 123 2.1% 125 2.6% 668 2.2% 11.7%

Others 154 2.1% 173 2.7% 172 2.9% 196 3.4% 156 3.2% 851 2.8% 2.3%

Subtotal 7,306 100% 6,352 100% 6,001 100% 5,829 100% 4869 100% 30,357 100% 100%

Unknown 4,523 3,516 2,851 2,674 2,619 16,183

Total 11,829 9,868 8,852 8,503 7,488 46,540

New York

CityPopulatio

n

5-year Total20112010 201320122009


13/121

Table 9: Race of Subject Officers Compared to New York City Police Department Demographics 2009-2013

Race Number

Percent of

Subtotal

NYPDPopulation

2009 Number

Percent of

Subtotal

NYPDPopulation

2010 Number

Percent of

Subtotal

NYPDPopulation

2011

White 2,802 49.4% 53.4% 2,969 49.4% 52.9% 2,928 50.4% 52.4%

Black 986 17.4% 16.4% 1,036 17.2% 16.4% 1,017 17.5% 16.3%

Latino 1,605 28.3% 25.6% 1,755 29.2% 25.8% 1,589 27.3% 26.0%

Asian 257 4.5% 4.5% 246 4.1% 4.8% 267 4.6% 5.2%

Other 18 0.3% 0.1% 10 0.2% 0.1% 11 0.2% 0.1%

Subtotal 5,668 100% 100% 6,016 100% 100% 5,812 100% 100%

Officer unidentified 6,035 4,215 3,831Total 11,703 10,231 9,643

Race Number

Percent of

Subtotal

NYPD

Population

2012 Number

Percent of

Subtotal

NYPD

Population

2013

White 2,727 50.0% 52.2% 2,657 51.6% 51.8%

Black 948 17.4% 16.1% 840 16.3% 15.8%Latino 1,522 27.9% 26.1% 1,399 27.2% 26.4%

Asian 236 4.3% 5.5% 247 4.8% 5.9%

Other 19 0.3% 0.1% 8 0.2% 0.1%

Subtotal 5,452 100% 100% 5,151 100% 100%

Officer unidentified 3,924 3,493

Total 9,376 8,644

2011

2012

20102009

2013


14/121

Table 10: Gender of All eged Victims Compared to New York Cit y Demographics 2009-2013

Gender

Number

Percent of

Subtotal Number

Percent of

Subtotal Number

Percent of

Subtotal Number

Percent of

Subtotal Number

Percent of

Subtotal Number

Percent of

Subtotal

Male 7,753 70.6% 6,616 71.3% 6,039 71.5% 5,602 70.5% 5,042 71.3% 31,052 71.0% 47.7%

Female 3,226 29.4% 2,661 28.7% 2,408 28.5% 2,344 29.5% 2,025 28.7% 12,664 29.0% 52.3%

Subtotal 10,979 100% 9,277 100% 8,447 100% 7,946 100% 7,067 100% 43,716 100% 100%

Unknown 850 591 405 557 421 2,824

Total 11,829 9,868 8,852 8,503 7,488 46,540

New York

City

Population

2012 5-year Total20132010 20112009


15/121

Table 11: Gender of Subject Officers Compared to New York City Poli ce Department Demographics 2009-2013

Gender Number

Percent of

Subtotal

NYPD

Population

2009 Number

Percent of

Subtotal

NYPD

Population

2010 Number

Percent of

Subtotal

NYPD

Population

2011

Male 5,185 89.6% 82.5% 5,453 89.2% 82.7% 5,316 90.2% 83.0%

Female 601 10.4% 17.5% 657 10.8% 17.3% 578 9.8% 17.0%

Subtotal 5,786 100% 100% 6,110 100% 100% 5,894 100% 100%

Officer unidentified 5,917 4,121 3,749

Total 11,703 10,231 9,643

Gender Number

Percent of

Subtotal

NYPD

Population

2012 Number

Percent of

Subtotal

NYPD

Population

2013

Male 4,991 90.0% 83.1% 4,788 90.6% 83.1%

Female 556 10.0% 16.9% 495 9.4% 16.9%

Subtotal 5,547 100% 100% 5,283 100% 100%

Officer unidentified 3,829 3,361

Total 9,376 8,644

2009 20112010

2012 2013


16/121

Table 12A: Age of Alleged Victims Compared to New York City Demographics 2009-2013

Age Number

Percent of

Subtotal Number

Percent of

Subtotal Number

Percent of

Subtotal Number

Percent of

Subtotal Number

Percent of

Subtotal Number

Percent of

Subtotal

14 and under 135 1.6% 102 1.5% 101 1.7% 122 2.0% 72 1.4% 532 1.6% 23.2%

15-24 2,557 31.0% 2,063 29.8% 1,860 30.5% 1,900 31.6% 1,654 31.3% 10,034 30.8% 15.8%

25-34 2,416 29.3% 2,063 29.8% 1,804 29.5% 1,736 28.8% 1,521 28.8% 9,540 29.3% 14.5%

35-44 1,500 18.2% 1,299 18.8% 1,100 18.0% 1,101 18.3% 976 18.5% 5,976 18.3% 14.5%

45-54 1,152 14.0% 960 13.9% 879 14.4% 770 12.8% 706 13.4% 4,467 13.7% 12.6%

55-64 368 4.5% 330 4.8% 278 4.6% 307 5.1% 270 5.1% 1,553 4.8% 8.9%

65 and over 116 1.4% 106 1.5% 84 1.4% 86 1.4% 83 1.6% 475 1.5% 10.5%

Subtotal 8,244 100.0% 6,923 100.0% 6,106 100.0% 6,022 100.0% 5,282 100.0% 32,577 100.0% 100.0%

Unknown 3,585 2,945 2,746 2,481 2,206 13,963

Total 11,829 9,868 8,852 8,503 7,488 46,540

2009 2010

New York

CityPopulation

5-year Total2011 2012 2013


17/121

Table 12B: Alleged Victims by Residence

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total

Crotona - Tremont 503 407 406 308 282 1,906

Fordham - Bronx Park 535 370 398 258 236 1,797

High Bridge - Morrisania 520 467 366 352 266 1,971

Hunts Point - Mott Haven 434 348 325 293 287 1,687

Kingsbridge - Riverdale 91 58 28 43 34 254

Northeast Bronx 320 242 221 201 147 1,131

Pelham - Throgs Neck 387 322 308 291 232 1,540

Bedford Stuyvesant - Crown Heights 943 835 798 738 637 3,951Bensonhurst - Bay Ridge 78 68 79 75 53 353

Borough Park 140 102 114 98 94 548

Canarsie - Flatlands 276 212 173 191 171 1,023

Coney Island - Sheepshead Bay 263 189 163 188 157 960

Downtown Brooklyn - Heights - Slope 197 204 130 168 148 847

East Flatbush - Flatbush 555 502 324 358 325 2,064

East New York 532 530 552 435 383 2,432

Greenpoint 77 63 65 59 42 306Sunset Park 89 78 51 59 36 313

Williamsburg - Bushwick 474 402 369 364 321 1,930

Central Harlem - Morningside Heights 477 356 306 280 213 1,632

Chelsea - Clinton 104 65 64 70 65 368

East Harlem 277 255 201 216 167 1,116

Gramercy Park - Murray Hill 45 30 33 32 35 175

Greenwich Village - Soho 33 24 29 18 23 127

Lower Manhattan 28 24 41 24 22 139

Union Square - Lower East Side 174 108 100 133 100 615

Upper East Side 35 36 27 29 24 151

Upper West Side 134 90 84 77 84 469

W hi t H i ht I d


18/121

Table 13: Where Incidents that Led to a Complaint Took Place by Precinct

Citywide 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total

Bronx 1,840 1,616 1,456 1,255 1,071 7,238Brooklyn 2,560 2,213 2,010 1,954 1,835 10,572

Queens 1,039 931 911 894 923 4,698

Manhattan 1,807 1,367 1,315 1,301 1,252 7,042

Staten Island 316 261 229 257 237 1,300

New York City 7,562 6,388 5,921 5,661 5,318 30,850

Outside City/ Unidentified 98 78 48 80 92 396

Total 7,660 6,466 5,969 5,741 5,410 31,246


19/121

Table 13A: Where Incidents that Led t o a Complaint Took Place by Precinct - Manhattan 2009-2013

Manhattan South 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total

1st Precinct 60 56 76 73 40 305

5th Precinct 62 46 40 43 53 244

6th Precinct 73 53 71 63 55 315

7th Precinct 79 52 53 54 41 279

9th Precinct 76 60 51 67 70 324

10th Precinct 64 51 44 34 43 236

13th Precinct 67 54 51 62 60 294

Midtown South 142 123 97 90 99 551

17th Precinct 33 22 46 42 41 184

Midtown North 93 70 67 77 82 389

Manhattan South Total 749 587 596 605 584 3,121

Manhattan North

19th Precinct 53 48 45 38 36 220

20th Precinct 31 35 40 26 36 168

23rd Precinct 125 111 98 93 80 507

24th Precinct 54 39 36 46 49 224

25th Precinct 114 113 100 87 92 506

26th Precinct 51 28 30 42 44 195

Central Park 5 7 2 5 6 25

28th Precinct 130 94 80 72 75 45130th Precinct 99 69 39 44 58 309

32nd Precinct 167 112 120 105 61 565

33rd Precinct 90 56 62 46 60 314

34th Precinct 139 68 67 92 71 437

Manhattan North Total 1,058 780 719 696 668 3,921

Manhattan Total 1,807 1,367 1,315 1,301 1,252 7,042


20/121

Table 13B: Where Incidents that Led to a Complaint Took Place by Precinct - Bronx 2009-2013

Bronx 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total

40th Precinct 183 145 103 165 154 43141st Precinct 118 122 120 102 83 360

42nd Precinct 155 140 95 102 86 390

43rd Precinct 149 132 145 114 94 426

44th Precinct 225 246 215 196 137 686

45th Precinct 83 56 50 37 33 189

46th Precinct 239 212 209 142 102 660

47th Precinct 235 187 164 134 117 586

48th Precinct 128 127 132 79 87 387

49th Precinct 72 68 53 59 39 193

50th Precinct 57 38 28 31 23 12352nd Precinct 196 143 142 94 116 481

Bronx Total 1,840 1,616 1,456 1,255 1,071 4,912


21/121

Table 13C: Where Incidents that Led to a Complaint Took Place by Precinct - Brooklyn 2009-2013

Brooklyn South 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total

60th Precinct 122 76 83 81 71 281

61st Precinct 79 63 45 52 46 187

62nd Precinct 37 22 35 32 36 94

63rd Precinct 46 62 46 61 47 154

66th Precinct 36 28 21 16 25 85

67th Precinct 201 140 109 114 108 450

68th Precinct 38 34 37 37 30 109

69th Precinct 82 48 52 53 55 182

70th Precinct 160 141 124 114 104 425

71st Precinct 110 103 93 102 89 306

72nd Precinct 71 60 47 50 52 178

76th Precinct 46 46 32 51 30 124

78th Precinct 27 22 21 17 33 70

Brooklyn South Total 1,055 845 745 780 726 2,645

Brooklyn North

73rd Precinct 251 230 212 205 161 693

75th Precinct 356 330 347 286 266 1,033

77th Precinct 160 173 159 107 120 492

79th Precinct 219 163 135 161 184 517

81st Precinct 125 142 126 97 106 393

83rd Precinct 143 103 102 119 87 348

84th Precinct 72 60 51 47 64 183

88th Precinct 60 66 41 51 41 167

90th Precinct 82 78 67 68 51 227

94th Precinct 37 23 25 33 29 85

Brooklyn North Total 1,505 1,368 1,265 1,174 1,109 4,138

Brooklyn Total 2,560 2,213 2,010 1,954 1,835 6,783


22/121

Table 13D: Where Incidents that Led to a Complaint Took Place by Precinct - Queens 2009-2013

Queens South 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total

100th Precinct 39 26 35 32 28 100101st Precinct 77 108 85 91 75 270

102nd Precinct 44 47 48 51 56 139

103rd Precinct 106 113 108 98 123 327

105th Precinct 90 90 71 73 75 251

106th Precinct 73 61 61 64 46 195

107th Precinct 55 42 36 36 45 133

113th Precinct 107 98 102 100 110 307

Queens South Total 591 585 546 545 558 1,722

Queens North

104th Precinct 59 39 51 49 50 149

108th Precinct 44 21 21 35 22 86

109th Precinct 59 36 54 46 48 149

110th Precinct 63 60 56 38 52 179

111th Precinct 27 18 21 22 18 66

112th Precinct 22 26 26 23 27 74

114th Precinct 83 77 63 81 84 223

115th Precinct 91 69 73 55 64 233

Queens North Total 448 346 365 349 365 1,159

Queens Total 1,039 931 911 894 923 2,881


23/121

Table 13E: Where Incidents that Led to a Complaint Took Place by Precinct - Staten Island 2009-2013

Staten Island 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total

120th Precinct 220 182 149 177 124 551

121st Precinct 0 0 0 0 38 0

122nd Precinct 72 55 64 63 63 191123rd Precinct 24 24 16 17 12 64

Staten Island Total 316 261 229 257 237 806

Outside City/ Unidentified 98 78 48 80 92 396


24/121

Table 14: Attribut ion of Complaints to Patrol Boroughs and Other Commands* 2009-2013

Patrol Services Bureau 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total

Patrol Borough Manhattan South 264 243 282 261 272 1,322

Patrol Borough Manhattan North 430 412 389 371 379 1,981

Patrol Borough Bronx 772 887 798 708 587 3,752

Patrol Borough Brooklyn South 440 478 410 471 423 2,222

Patrol Borough Brooklyn North 603 616 611 583 562 2,975

Patrol Borough Queens South 265 331 318 293 334 1,541

Patrol Borough Queens North 182 162 207 195 191 937

Patrol Borough Staten Island 136 140 117 150 132 675

Special Operations Division 16 18 25 21 27 107

Other Patrol Services Bureau Commands 3 3 0 3 1 10

Subtotal - Patrol Services Bureau 3,111 3,290 3,157 3,056 2,908 15,522

Specialized Bureaus

Chief of Transportation

Transit Bureau 198 177 175 177 207 934

Traffic Control Division 55 58 55 52 44 264

Housing Bureau 289 301 239 267 241 1,337

Organized Crime Control Bureau 294 328 352 301 243 1,518

Detective Bureau 212 184 166 178 187 927

Other Bureaus 66 56 45 53 55 275

Subtotal - Other Bureaus 1,114 1,104 1,032 1,028 977 5,255

Other Commands

Deputy Commissioners and Misc. Units 26 21 41 40 20 148

Undetermined 4,049 4,286 3,232 1,171 1,128 13,866

Total 8,300 8,701 7,462 5,295 5,033 34,791

* Since complaints with allegations against subject officers assigned to more than one command are assigned to each of the

commands with a subject officer, the total number of complaints appears higher than the total annual complaints listed in

Table 1. See the Guide to Tables for more details.


25/121

Table 15A: Att ributi on of Complaints t o Patrol Borough Manhattan South 2009-2013

Manhattan South 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total

1st Precinct 9 24 29 25 16 1035th Precinct 19 20 13 13 20 85

6th Precinct 31 19 40 30 34 154

7th Precinct 32 28 32 22 18 132

9th Precinct 29 24 21 26 25 125

10th Precinct 19 21 33 19 18 110

13th Precinct 19 12 19 25 31 106

Midtown South 37 44 23 24 32 160

17th Precinct 17 9 17 20 24 87

Midtown North 30 26 27 28 29 140Precincts Total 242 227 254 232 247 1,202

Task Force 13 8 7 3 4 35

Borough HQ 1 6 20 25 14 66

Anti-crime Unit 8 2 1 1 7 19

Manhattan South

Total 264 243 282 261 272 1,322


26/121

Table 15B: Attribut ion of Complaints to Patrol Borough Manhattan North 2009-2013

Manhattan North 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total

19th Precinct 22 20 25 18 21 106

20th Precinct 15 20 22 20 25 102

23rd Precinct 35 34 39 36 33 17724th Precinct 28 18 16 30 29 121

25th Precinct 22 34 39 37 31 163

26th Precinct 19 13 11 17 14 74

Central Park 6 5 4 9 7 31

28th Precinct 38 37 31 20 34 160

30th Precinct 21 29 29 22 30 131

32nd Precinct 63 39 48 41 27 218

33rd Precinct 31 25 25 28 33 142

34th Precinct 47 26 41 44 44 202

Precincts Total 347 300 330 322 328 1,627

Task Force 13 20 8 5 13 59

Borough HQ 0 14 40 41 35 130


Impact Response Team 66 69 0 0 0 135

Patrol Borough Manhattan

North Total 430 412 389 371 379 1,981


27/121

Table 15C: Attr ibution of Complaints to Patrol Bor ough Br onx 2009-2013

Bronx 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total

40th Precinct 53 36 18 49 52 208

41st Precinct 53 72 43 53 39 260


44th Precinct 98 95 107 96 65 461

45th Precinct 23 37 27 22 20 129

46th Precinct 102 109 92 78 42 423

47th Precinct 97 89 58 60 60 364

48th Precinct 59 67 63 34 34 257

49th Precinct 31 28 35 25 23 142

50th Precinct 26 23 18 12 15 94

52nd Precinct 89 61 46 51 52 299

Precincts Total 729 738 603 553 482 3,105

Task Force 12 11 11 17 7 58

Borough HQ 6 46 181 137 92 462



Patrol Borough Bronx

Total 772 887 798 708 587 3,752


28/121

Table 15D: Attr ibution of Complaints to Patrol Bor ough Br ooklyn South 2009-2013

Brooklyn South 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total

60th Precinct 21 23 25 24 22 115

61st Precinct 28 29 25 30 24 136


66th Precinct 18 12 11 15 17 73

67th Precinct 64 53 41 48 41 247

68th Precinct 13 13 19 23 18 86

69th Precinct 33 27 29 30 36 155

70th Precinct 82 86 66 52 60 346

71st Precinct 42 53 41 52 35 223

72nd Precinct 29 33 25 29 29 145

76th Precinct 17 24 10 25 15 91

78th Precinct 9 14 12 12 20 67

Precincts Total 393 413 359 398 369 1,932

Task Force 10 11 7 9 6 43

Borough HQ 2 11 40 61 38 152



Patrol Borough

Brooklyn South Total 440 478 410 471 423 2,222


29/121

Table 15E: Attr ibution of Complaints to Patrol Bor ough Broo klyn North 2009-2013

Patrol Borough Brooklyn

North 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013Total

73rd Precinct 98 79 57 56 48 338

75th Precinct 128 131 109 98 91 557

77th Precinct 73 75 69 53 55 325

79th Precinct 67 68 51 52 81 319

81st Precinct 40 63 59 47 37 246

83rd Precinct 65 41 58 55 51 270

84th Precinct 16 17 11 20 27 91

88th Precinct 26 18 18 16 18 96

90th Precinct 35 39 22 29 21 146

94th Precinct 19 13 16 17 18 83

Precincts Total 567 544 470 443 447 2,471

Task Force 12 6 7 8 9 42

Borough Headquarters 1 31 129 125 102 388Anti-crime Unit 7 5 5 7 4 28


Patrol Borough Brooklyn

North Total 603 616 611 583 562 2,975


30/121

Table 15F: Attrib ution of Complaints to Patrol Borough Queens South 2009-2013

Queens South 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total

100th Precinct 22 18 18 14 20 92

101st Precinct 26 55 56 51 40 228


105th Precinct 33 49 48 39 44 213

106th Precinct 32 41 29 33 22 157

107th Precinct 24 24 15 16 21 100

113th Precinct 46 46 51 52 57 252

Precincts Total 240 299 294 267 296 1,396

Task Force 9 6 3 5 5 28

Borough HQ 1 5 20 17 32 75


Borough HQ 12 18 0 0 0 30

Patrol Borough

Queens South Total 265 331 318 293 334 1,541


31/121

Table 15G: Attrib ution of Complaints to Patrol Borough Queens North 2009-2013

Queens North 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total

104th Precinct 32 16 31 31 30 110

108th Precinct 13 9 13 29 13 64

109th Precinct 23 13 29 25 28 90110th Precinct 21 19 28 19 28 87

111th Precinct 6 11 17 13 8 47

112th Precinct 11 16 15 14 15 56

114th Precinct 28 27 32 33 25 120

115th Precinct 40 36 24 20 29 120

Precincts Total 174 147 189 184 176 694

Task Force 3 5 5 3 3 16

Borough HQ 4 6 10 7 10 27


Patrol Borough

Queens North Total 182 162 207 195 191 746


32/121

Table 15H: Attribu tion of Complaints to Patrol Borough Staten Island 2009-2013

Staten Island 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total

120th Precinct 65 78 65 94 53 355

121nd Precinct 0 0 0 0 34 34


Precincts Total 101 121 102 139 122 585

Task Force 5 10 10 7 6 38

Borough HQ 4 5 5 2 3 19

Anti-Crime Unit 1 0 0 2 1 4

Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0

Court 2 0 0 0 0 2


Patrol Borough Staten

Island Total 136 140 117 150 132 675


33/121

Table 15I: Att ribut ion of Complaints to Special Operations Division 2009-2013

Special Operations 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total

Emergency Service 14 16 25 19 26 100

Harbor Unit 0 1 0 0 0 1

Aviation Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0

Canine Unit 0 0 0 2 0 2

Mounted Unit 1 1 0 0 1 3

Disorder 1 0 0 0 0 1

Special Operations

Division Total 16 18 25 21 27 107


34/121

Table 15J: Attribution of Complaints to Other Patrol Services Bureau Commands 2009-2013

Other Patrol Services

Bureau Commands 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total

Chief's Office 3 3 0 3 0 9

Taxi Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0

Headquarters 0 0 0 0 1 1

Other Patrol Services

Bureau Commands

Total 3 3 0 3 1 10


35/121

Table 15L: Attribut ion of Complaints to Traffic Control Division 2009-2013

Traffic Control Division 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total

Headquarters Command 0 0 0 0 0 0

Manhattan Task Force 19 18 20 25 16 98

Brooklyn Task Force 0 0 0 0 0 0Bronx Task Force 0 0 0 0 0 0

Queens Task Force 0 0 0 0 0 0

Surface Transportation Enforcement Division 3 6 3 4 1 17

Bus 3 6 3 0 2 14

Parking Enforcement District 0 0 0 0 0 0

Tow Units 0 0 0 0 0 0

Summons Enforcement 0 0 0 0 0 0

Intersection Control 0 0 0 0 0 0

Intelligence 0 0 0 0 0 0

Highway District 2 0 0 2 0 4

Highway 1 11 7 14 9 8 49

Highway 2 4 9 7 7 7 34

Highway 3 10 7 6 4 7 34

Highway 4 1 3 0 0 0 4

Highway 5 2 1 2 1 3 9

Highway Safety 0 0 0 0 0 0

Movie and Television 0 1 0 0 0 1

Traffic Control Division Total 55 58 55 52 44 264


36/121

Table 15K: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau 2009-2013

Transit Bureau 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total

Transit Bureau Headquarters 17 26 22 30 37 132

TB Liaison 0 0 0 0 0 0

TB Inspections 0 0 0 0 0 0

TB Special Investigations 0 0 0 0 0 0

TB Crime Analysis 0 0 0 0 0 0

TB Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0

TB Manhattan 1 1 0 0 0 2

TB Bronx 0 1 0 0 0 1

TB Queens 0 0 0 0 0 0

TB Brooklyn 1 0 0 0 0 1

TB DT 01 14 8 8 12 13 55

TB DT 02 11 4 11 8 8 42

TB DT 03 23 10 22 16 11 82

TB DT 04 17 13 16 12 16 74

TB DT 11 8 10 7 8 7 40

TB DT 12 10 9 5 4 11 39

TB DT 20 17 14 9 19 14 73

TB DT 23 3 5 9 2 2 21

TB DT 30 14 18 14 11 16 73

TB DT 32 12 14 7 10 13 56

TB DT 33 19 17 9 19 18 82

TB DT 34 7 10 9 6 11 43

TB Manhattan/TF 8 6 5 2 4 25

TB Bronx/TF 2 2 1 1 5 11

TB Queens/TF 0 0 0 0 0 0TB Brooklyn/TF 5 3 5 2 1 16

TB Canine 1 2 2 3 5 13

TB Homeless 1 1 1 1 2 6

TB Vandal 2 1 3 1 1 8

TB Special Operations Unit 5 1 2 3 1 12

TB Anti-Terrorism Unit 0 1 8 7 11 27

TB Other 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transit Bureau Total 198 177 175 177 207 934


37/121

Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints to the Housing Bureau 2009-2013

Housing Bureau 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total

Office of the Chief0 0 0 1 0 1

HB Special operations Section 6 2 2 3 0 13

PSA 1 26 32 27 29 27 141

PSA 2 62 68 54 43 31 258

PSA 3 29 34 24 32 27 146

PSA 4 20 13 9 22 16 80

PSA 5 55 27 24 20 16 142

PSA 6 12 17 19 12 13 73

PSA 7 30 32 29 33 23 147

PSA 8 9 20 17 19 32 97PSA 9 5 16 14 18 24 77

HB Brooklyn 2 0 0 0 0 2

HB Brooklyn Impact Response Team 11 14 3 15 9 52

HB Manhattan 1 1 0 0 1 3

HB Manhattan Impact Response Team 5 12 9 10 10 46

HB Bronx/Queens 1 0 0 0 1 2

HB Bronx/Queens Impact Response Team 15 13 8 10 11 57

HB Investigation 0 0 0 0 0 0

HB Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0HB Vandalism 0 0 0 0 0 0

Housing Bu reau Total 289 301 239 267 241 1,337


38/121

Table 15N: Attribu tion of Complaints to t he Organized Crime Control Bureau 2009-2013

Organized Crime Control

Bureau 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013Total

Queens Narcotics 28 37 41 28 19 153

Manhattan North Narcotics 48 47 45 43 40 223Manhattan South Narcotics 15 14 7 10 20 66

Bronx Narcotics 71 77 80 80 63 371

Staten Island Narcotics 22 25 18 21 13 99

Brooklyn South Narcotics 54 66 103 76 49 348

Brooklyn North Narcotics 38 49 39 31 28 185

Narcotics 2 0 4 4 3 13

Auto Crime 1 2 1 1 2 7

Vice Enforcement 14 8 9 1 2 34

Drug Enforcement 0 2 0 0 1 3

Organized Crime HQ 1 1 5 6 3 16

Organized Crime Control

Bureau Total 294 328 352 301 243 1518


39/121

Table 15O: Attribution of Complaints to the Detective Bureau 2009-2013

Detective Bureau 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total

Detective Headquarters 1 1 0 1 0 3

Central Investigation and Resource Division 0 0 0 0 0 0

Special Investigations 3 5 3 0 6 11Special Victims 3 3 4 5 4 15

Forensic Investigations 0 1 1 0 0 2

Fugitive Enforcement 47 33 30 37 41 147

Gang Units 43 51 36 34 41 164

DB Manhattan Units 21 19 16 19 23 75

DB Bronx Units 28 17 23 33 13 101

DB Brooklyn Units 36 31 25 28 29 120

DB Queens Units 29 15 25 18 23 87

DB Staten Island Units 1 8 3 3 7 15

Detective Bureau Total 212 184 166 178 187 740


40/121

Table 15P: Att ribut ion of Complaints to Other Bureaus 2009-2013

Other Bureaus Total

Internal Affairs Bureau

Internal Affairs 3 0 2 3 4 8

Criminal Justi ce Bureau 0

Court Division 59 50 36 46 50 191

Criminal Justice HQ 2 0 0 0 0 2

Support Services Bureau 0

Property Clerk 0 4 2 0 0 6Fleet Services 0 0 3 1 0 4

Central Record Division 0 0 0 1 0 1

Personnel Bureau 0

Applicant Processing 1 0 0 0 0 1

Health Services 0 0 1 1 0 2

Personnel Bureau HQ 1 2 1 1 1 5

Other Bureaus Total 66 56 45 53 55 220


41/121

Table 15Q: Attribution of Complaints to Deputy Commissioners and Miscellaneous Commands 2009-2013

Deputy Commissioners and Miscellaneous

Commands2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Total

DC Legal Matters - License Division 0 0 1 1 0 2

DC Legal Matters - Legal Bureau 0 0 0 1 0 1

DC Training - Police Academy 0 0 2 1 0 3

DC Training - Police Academy Training 2 2 0 5 2 11

DC Training - In-service Training Section 0 1 4 3 5 13

DC Management and Budget 1 0 1 1 0 3

PC Office 2 0 1 1 0 4

Chief of Community Affairs 0 1 2 1 0 4

School Safety Division 4 5 11 3 0 23

Office of Equal Employment 0 0 0 0 0 0

DC Operations 0 1 5 0 0 6

DC Intelligence 16 10 13 21 11 71

Chief of Department 1 0 1 1 2 5

Department Advocate 0 0 0 0 0 0

DC Public Information 0 0 0 0 0 0

Crime Prevention 0 0 0 0 0 0

First Deputy Commissioner 0 0 0 0 0 0

DC Strategic Initiatives (OMAP) 0 0 0 0 0 0

Quality Assurance Division 0 0 0 0 0 0

DC Counterterrorism 0 1 0 1 0 2

Deputy Commissioners and Miscellaneous

Commands Total 26 21 41 40 20 148


42/121

Table 16A: Command Rankings: Complaints per Uniformed Officer

2009

Ranking Precinct/Command Complaints Number of

Subject Officers

Complaints per

Uniformed Officer

1 Patrol Borough Bronx 772 3,095 0.2494

2 Patrol Borough Brooklyn North 603 2,891 0.2086

3 Patrol Borough Brooklyn South 440 2,501 0.1759

4 Patrol Borough Manhattan North 430 2,604 0.1651

5 Organized Crime Control Bureau 294 1,794 0.1639

6 Patrol Borough Queens South 265 1,748 0.1516

7 Patrol Borough Staten Island 136 941 0.1445

8 Housing Bureau 289 2,002 0.14449 Patrol Borough Manhattan South 264 2,315 0.1140

10 Patrol Borough Queens North 182 1,830 0.0995

11 Traffic Control Division 55 709 0.0776

12 Transit Bureau 198 2,576 0.0769

13 Detective Bureau 212 3,432 0.0618

14 Other Bureaus 66 3,012 0.0219

15 Special Operations Division 16 741 0.0216

16 Other Patrol Services Bureau Commands 3 189 0.0159

17 Deputy Commissioners and Misc. Units 26 2,066 0.0126


43/121

Table 16B: Command Rankings: Complaints per Uniformed Officer

2010

Ranking Precinct/Command Complaints Number ofSubject Officers

Complaints perUniformed Officer







7 Patrol Borough Staten Island 140 917 0.15278 Housing Bureau 301 1,982 0.1519

9 Patrol Borough Manhattan South 243 2,258 0.1076



12 Transit Bureau 177 2,589 0.0684



15 Other Bureaus 56 2,881 0.0194




44/121

Table 16C: Command Rankings: Complaints per Uniformed Officer

2011

Ranking Precinct/Command Complaints Number ofSubject Officers Complaints perUniformed Officer







7 Patrol Borough Manhattan South 282 2,251 0.12538 Patrol Borough Staten Island 117 937 0.1249

9 Housing Bureau 239 1,921 0.1244



12 Transit Bureau 175 2,351 0.0744




16 Other Bureaus 45 4,037 0.0111



45/121

Table 16D: Command Rankings: Complaints per Uniformed Officer

2012

Ranking Precinct/Command Complaints

Number of

OfficersAss igned to

Command

Complaints per

Uniformed

Officer





5 Patrol Borough Staten Island 150 959 0.1564


7 Patrol Borough Queens South 293 1,969 0.14888 Housing Bureau 267 2,057 0.1298


10 Patrol Borough Manhattan South 261 2,331 0.1120


12 Transit Bureau 177 2,450 0.0722




16 Other Bureaus 53 2,826 0.018817 Other Patrol Services Bureau Commands 3 185 0.0162


46/121

Table 16E: Command Rankings: Complaints per Uniformed Officer

2013

Ranking Precinct/Command Complaints

Number of

OfficersAss igned to

Command

Complaints per

Uniformed

Officer







7 Patrol Borough Staten Island 132 925 0.14278 Patrol Borough Manhattan South 272 2,296 0.1185

9 Housing Bureau 241 2,056 0.1172


11 Transit Bureau 207 2,667 0.0776




15 Other Bureaus 55 2,707 0.0203

16 Deputy Commissioners and Misc. Units 20 2,169 0.009217 Other Patrol Services Bureau Commands 1 372 0.0027


47/121

Table 17A: Reasons for Police-Civilian Encounters that Led to a Complaint 2009-2013

Nu mb er P er ce nt N um be r P er ce nt N um be r P er ce nt N um be r P er ce nt N um be r P er ce nt

Aided case 17 0.2% 16 0.2% 26 0.4% 32 0.6% 19 0.4%

Assisting Administration for Children Services 7 0.1% 3 0.0% 1 0.0% 5 0.1% 5 0.1%

Automobile checkpoint 4 0.1% 7 0.1% 14 0.2% 12 0.2% 12 0.2%

Complainant or victim at precinct to file complaint of crime 46 0.6% 36 0.6% 47 0.8% 55 1.0% 45 0.8%

Complainant or victim at precinct to obtain information 83 1.1% 54 0.8% 65 1.1% 58 1.0% 59 1.1%

Complainant or victim at precinct to retrieve property 17 0.2% 20 0.3% 22 0.4% 23 0.4% 13 0.2%

Complainant or victim observed encounter with third party 117 1.5% 97 1.5% 103 1.7% 129 2.2% 109 2.0%

Complainant or victim requested information from officer 31 0.4% 19 0.3% 29 0.5% 31 0.5% 49 0.9%

Complainant or victim requested investigation of crime 169 2.2% 127 2.0% 110 1.8% 112 2.0% 116 2.1%

Complainant or victim telephoned precinct 45 0.6% 35 0.5% 139 2.3% 214 3.7% 270 5.0%

Demonstration or protest 2 0.0% 3 0.0% 28 0.5% 25 0.4% 4 0.1%

Dispute 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 0.0%

Emotionally disturbed person aided case 49 0.6% 38 0.6% 57 1.0% 47 0.8% 56 1.0%

Execution of arrest or bench warrant 91 1.2% 79 1.2% 80 1.3% 104 1.8% 79 1.5%

Execution of search warrant 148 1.9% 146 2.3% 147 2.5% 131 2.3% 127 2.3%

Moving violation 298 3.9% 275 4.3% 212 3.6% 268 4.7% 223 4.1%

Other violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law 149 1.9% 155 2.4% 162 2.7% 181 3.2% 158 2.9%

Patrol encounter 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Parade 14 0.2% 9 0.1% 9 0.2% 9 0.2% 13 0.2%

Parking violation 167 2.2% 127 2.0% 112 1.9% 118 2.1% 106 2.0%

Police suspected complainant or victim of crime/auto 375 4.9% 317 4.9% 261 4.4% 288 5.0% 278 5.1%

Police suspected complainant or victim of crime/bldg 572 7.5% 426 6.6% 368 6.2% 369 6.4% 356 6.6%

Police suspected complainant or victim of crime/street 2,010 26.2% 1,714 26.5% 1,598 26.8% 1,404 24.5% 1,134 21.0%

Police suspected complainant or victim of crime/subway 176 2.3% 133 2.1% 131 2.2% 152 2.6% 148 2.7%

Regulatory inspection 3 0.0% 6 0.1% 1 0.0% 7 0.1% 2 0.0%

Report of dispute 342 4.5% 308 4.8% 314 5.3% 300 5.2% 285 5.3%

Report of domestic dispute 128 1.7% 142 2.2% 143 2.4% 133 2.3% 135 2.5%

Report of gun possession or shots fired 60 0.8% 55 0.9% 79 1.3% 53 0.9% 52 1.0%

Report of noise or disturbance 66 0.9% 59 0.9% 64 1.1% 51 0.9% 55 1.0%

Report of possession or sale of narcotics 60 0.8% 61 0.9% 47 0.8% 42 0.7% 63 1.2%

Report of other crime 144 1.9% 169 2.6% 156 2.6% 150 2.6% 136 2.5%

Traffic accident 74 1.0% 71 1.1% 73 1.2% 52 0.9% 67 1.2%Transit checkpoint 13 0.2% 7 0.1% 4 0.1% 2 0.0% 9 0.2%

Data unavailable or unknown 35 0.5% 19 0.3% 6 0.1% 17 0.3% 22 0.4%

Other 2,147 28.0% 1,733 26.8% 1,361 22.8% 1,166 20.3% 1,204 22.3%

Total 7,660 100.0% 6,466 100.0% 5,969 100.0% 5,741 100.0% 5,410 100.0%

Complainant and/or alleged victim believes he or she was the

subject of "racial profiling"* 71 79 58 61 55

* The CCRB began capturing this information on July 1, 2004 (after a board vote) and captures it only if the complainant or alleged victim voluntarily expresses this belief.

20132012201120102009Type of Encounter


48/121

Table 17B: Charges Stemming from Encounter, 2009-2013

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent

No arrest made or summons issued 3,554 46.4% 2,965 45.9% 2,761 46.3% 2,699 47.0% 2,371 43.8%

Summons - Parking 127 1.7% 75 1.2% 79 1.3% 66 1.1% 84 1.6%

Summons - Moving violation 196 2.6% 150 2.3% 140 2.3% 156 2.7% 128 2.4%

Summons - Other VTL violation 101 1.3% 140 2.2% 121 2.0% 139 2.4% 112 2.1%

Summons - Disorderly conduct 407 5.3% 392 6.1% 284 4.8% 207 3.6% 177 3.3%

Summons - Harrasment 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0%

Summons - OGA 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 2 0.0% 1 0.0%

Summons - Other violation/crime 488 6.4% 408 6.3% 373 6.2% 297 5.2% 256 4.7%

Arrest - Disorderly conduct 234 3.1% 163 2.5% 152 2.5% 125 2.2% 84 1.6%

Arrest - Harrassment (against a PO) 1 0.0% 3 0.0% 5 0.1% 4 0.1% 2 0.0%

Arrest - OGA 124 1.6% 126 1.9% 141 2.4% 123 2.1% 96 1.8%

Arrest - Resisting arrest 266 3.5% 178 2.8% 175 2.9% 168 2.9% 178 3.3%

Arrest - Assault (against a PO) 113 1.5% 97 1.5% 73 1.2% 85 1.5% 90 1.7%

Arrest - Other violation/crime 2,012 26.3% 1,744 27.0% 1,641 27.5% 1,627 28.3% 1,795 33.2%

Juvenile Report 8 0.1% 14 0.2% 9 0.2% 7 0.1% 8 0.1%

Data unavailable or unknown 26 0.3% 11 0.2% 14 0.2% 36 0.6% 27 0.5%

Total 7,660 100.0% 6,466 100.0% 5,969 100.0% 5,741 100.0% 5,410 100.0%

Total - Arrest 2,750 35.9% 2,311 35.7% 2,187 36.6% 2,132 37.1% 2,245 41.5%

Total - Summons 1,322 17.3% 1,165 18.0% 998 16.7% 867 15.1% 759 14.0%

2013201220112009 2010Type of Encounter


49/121

APPENDIX B

CCRB PERFORMANCE DATA

2013


50/121

Table 18A: Average Days fo r the CCRB to Close Cases Measured from Date of Report 2009-2013

Disposition2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Five-year

Average

Full Investigations 349 299 284 333 374 328

Mediations 162 177 179 198 274 198

Mediation Attempted 227 264 267 261 351 284

Withdrawn, Uncooperative and

Unavailable Complaints 113 96 97 99 126 107

All Cases 193 172 164 177 210 185


51/121

Table 18B: Average Days for the CCRB to Close Substantiated Cases Measured f rom Date of Report 2009-2013

Penalty Recommendation2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Five-year

Average

Charges 401 363 351 415 444 398

Command Discipline 393 346 331 442 426 394

Instructions 342 319 331 407 402 362

No Recommendation 438 363 371 462 410 389

All Substant iated Cases 394 357 346 422 436 394


52/121

Table 19: Rate at Which the CCRB Made Findings on the Merits* 2009-2013

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Findings on the Merits 5,356 4,643 3,287 1,865 2,994

No Findings on the Merits4,787 4,252 3,549 2,580 4,624

Total Allegations Closed After Full

Investigation 10,143 8,895 6,836 4,445 7,618

Rate at Which the CCRB Made

Findings on t he Merits 53% 52% 48% 42% 39%

* Findings on the merits include "substantiated, "employee exonerated," and "unfounded"--those findings where

the board was able to come to a definite conclusion about the validity of the allegation after conducting a full

investigation.


53/121

Table 20: Age of Docket* Measured from the Date of Incident 2009-2013

Age of Case in

Months

Number of

Cases

Percent of

Docket

Number of

Cases

Percent of

Docket

Number of

Cases

Percent of

Docket

Number of

Cases

Percent of

Docket

Number of

Cases

Percent of

Docket

0 - 4 months 2,014 60.0% 1,800 64.6% 1,570 58.8% 2,105 51.2% 1,414 59.1%

5 - 7 months 497 14.8% 509 18.3% 584 21.9% 847 20.6% 452 18.9%

8 months 147 4.4% 121 4.3% 117 4.4% 166 4.0% 100 4.2%

9 months 154 4.6% 91 3.3% 108 4.0% 165 4.0% 97 4.1%

10 months 162 4.8% 65 2.3% 93 3.5% 148 3.6% 54 2.3%

11 months 86 2.6% 49 1.8% 53 2.0% 147 3.6% 58 2.4%

12 months 63 1.9% 38 1.4% 40 1.5% 107 2.6% 36 1.5%

13 months 60 1.8% 28 1.0% 20 0.7% 93 2.3% 26 1.1%

14 months 60 1.8% 24 0.9% 23 0.9% 91 2.2% 45 1.9%15 months 31 0.9% 22 0.8% 20 0.7% 69 1.7% 30 1.3%

16 months 20 0.6% 12 0.4% 5 0.2% 51 1.2% 37 1.5%

17 months 14 0.4% 4 0.1% 11 0.4% 41 1.0% 22 0.9%

18 or older 39 1.2% 14 0.5% 14 0.5% 41 1.0% 14 0.6%

Unknown 11 0.3% 9 0.3% 11 0.4% 38 0.9% 9 0.4%

Total Docket 3,358 100% 2,786 100% 2,669 100% 4,109 100% 2,394 100%

*The age of the docket is measured by the number of open cases at the end of each reporting period.

2011 20122009 2010 2013


54/121

Table 21: Age of Dock et* Measured from the Date of Report 2009-2013

Age of Case inMonths

Number ofCases

Percent ofDocket

Number ofCases

Percent ofDocket

Number ofCases

Percent ofDocket

Number ofCases

Percent ofDocket

Number ofCases

Percent ofDocket

0 - 4 months 2,102 62.6% 1,880 67.5% 1,678 62.9% 2,304 56.1% 1,547 64.6%

5 - 7 months 492 14.7% 489 17.6% 550 20.6% 784 19.1% 429 17.9%

8 months 145 4.3% 117 4.2% 115 4.3% 156 3.8% 103 4.3%

9 months 159 4.7% 76 2.7% 100 3.7% 163 4.0% 96 4.0%

10 months 145 4.3% 56 2.0% 77 2.9% 155 3.8% 36 1.5%

11 months 68 2.0% 51 1.8% 48 1.8% 131 3.2% 18 0.8%

12 months 66 2.0% 37 1.3% 25 0.9% 109 2.7% 25 1.0%

13 months 57 1.7% 19 0.7% 16 0.6% 76 1.8% 22 0.9%

14 months 48 1.4% 17 0.6% 20 0.7% 81 2.0% 40 1.7%

15 months 26 0.8% 25 0.9% 18 0.7% 56 1.4% 28 1.2%

16 months 14 0.4% 8 0.3% 5 0.2% 46 1.1% 25 1.0%

17 months 14 0.4% 1 0.0% 9 0.3% 28 0.7% 18 0.8%

18 or older 22 0.7% 10 0.4% 8 0.3% 20 0.5% 7 0.3%

Total Docket 3,358 100% 2,786 100% 2,669 100% 4,109 100% 2,394 100%

*The age of the docket is measured by the number of open cases at the end of each reporting period.

2011 201220102009 2013


55/121

Table 22A: Age of Substantiated Cases Measured from the Date of Incident 2009-2013

Age of Case in Mont hsNumber of

CasesPercent of

DocketNumber of

CasesPercent of

DocketNumber of

CasesPercent of

DocketNumber of

CasesPercent of

DocketNumber of

CasesPercent of

Docket

3 or younger 0 0.0% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.3%

4 months 1 0.5% 1 0.4% 2 1.3% 1 0.5% 2 0.7%

5 months 2 1.0% 11 4.2% 3 1.9% 1 0.5% 2 0.7%

6 months 5 2.5% 6 2.3% 4 2.5% 1 0.5% 3 1.0%

7 months 10 5.1% 21 8.1% 12 7.5% 3 1.6% 5 1.7%

8 months 10 5.1% 13 5.0% 12 7.5% 6 3.2% 8 2.7%

9 months 8 4.1% 17 6.5% 20 12.5% 5 2.6% 9 3.0%

10 months 21 10.7% 29 11.2% 16 10.0% 5 2.6% 16 5.3%

11 months 20 10.2% 20 7.7% 19 11.9% 12 6.3% 13 4.3%

12 months 16 8.1% 35 13.5% 16 10.0% 10 5.3% 17 5.7%13 months 18 9.1% 31 11.9% 12 7.5% 25 13.2% 22 7.3%

14 months 15 7.6% 30 11.5% 14 8.8% 34 18.0% 32 10.7%

15 months 24 12.2% 24 9.2% 18 11.3% 30 15.9% 43 14.3%

16 months 22 11.2% 12 4.6% 12 7.5% 32 16.9% 59 19.7%

17 months 14 7.1% 6 2.3% 0 0.0% 19 10.1% 47 15.7%

18 or older 11 5.6% 3 1.2% 0 0.0% 5 2.6% 21 7.0%

Total Docket 197 100% 260 100% 160 100% 189 100% 300 100%

Table 22B: Average Days for the CCRB to Close Substantiated Cases Measured from Date of Incident 2009-2013

Average Number o f

Days 401 367 352 435 454

2009 2010 2011 2012

20132009 2010 2011 2012

2013


56/121

Table 23A: Age of Substantiated Cases Measured from the Date of Report 2009-2013

Age of Case inMonths

Number ofCases

Percent ofDocket

Number ofCases

Percent ofDocket

Number ofCases

Percent ofDocket

Number ofCases

Percent ofDocket

Number ofCases

Percent ofDocket

3 or younger 0 0.0% 2 0.8% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 2 0.7%

4 months 1 0.5% 3 1.2% 2 1.3% 2 1.1% 2 0.7%

5 months 2 1.0% 10 3.8% 3 1.9% 1 0.5% 3 1.0%

6 months 5 2.5% 10 3.8% 4 2.5% 1 0.5% 4 1.3%

7 months 10 5.1% 21 8.1% 14 8.8% 2 1.1% 6 2.0%

8 months 11 5.6% 12 4.6% 17 10.6% 11 5.8% 7 2.3%

9 months 9 4.6% 18 6.9% 18 11.3% 3 1.6% 10 3.3%

10 months 20 10.2% 32 12.3% 16 10.0% 8 4.2% 19 6.3%

11 months 21 10.7% 18 6.9% 18 11.3% 13 6.9% 15 5.0%

12 months 18 9.1% 41 15.8% 17 10.6% 10 5.3% 15 5.0%

13 months 22 11.2% 25 9.6% 10 6.3% 29 15.3% 24 8.0%

14 months 13 6.6% 28 10.8% 12 7.5% 33 17.5% 38 12.7%

15 months 22 11.2% 22 8.5% 23 14.4% 28 14.8% 47 15.7%

16 months 23 11.7% 11 4.2% 6 3.8% 26 13.8% 53 17.7%

17 months 9 4.6% 4 1.5% 0 0.0% 17 9.0% 41 13.7%

18 or older 11 5.6% 3 1.2% 0 0.0% 4 2.1% 14 4.7%

Total Docket 197 100% 260 100% 160 100% 189 100% 300 100%

Table 23B: Average Days for the CCRB to Close Substantiated Cases Measured from Date of Report 2009-2013

Average Numb er of

Days

2012

394

2011

357 346

2009

20132009

2013

2012

422 436

2010 2011

2010


57/121

APPENDIX C

CCRB DISPOSITION DATA

2013


58/121

24.A Disposition of Cases 2009-2013

Full Investigations Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent

One or more allegations substantiated 197 7.4% 260 10.7% 160 8.3% 189 14.8% 300 14.4% 1,106 11%

8,642Department employee unidentified 123 4.6% 128 5.3% 119 6.2% 82 6.4% 119 5.7% 571 5%

Refer to IAB 1 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0%

Miscellaneous 9 0.3% 16 0.7% 7 0.4% 14 1.1% 17 0.8% 63 1%

Total 2,673 100% 2,424 100% 1,926 100% 1279 100% 2082 100% 10,384 100%

Mediation Closures Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent

Mediated 118 57.8% 157 46.0% 145 38.6% 75 26.3% 132 33.7% 627 39%

Mediation attempted 86 42.2% 184 54.0% 231 61.4% 210 73.7% 260 66.3% 971 61%

Total 204 100% 341 100% 376 100% 285 100% 392 100% 1598 100%

Case Resolution Rate* 2,877 36% 2,765 39% 2,302 38% 1,564 36% 2,474 35% 11,982 37%

Other Dispositions Number

Percent of all

closures Number

Percent of all

closures Number

Percent of all

closures Number

Percent of all

closures Number

Percent of all

closures

Complaint withdrawn 982 12.1% 742 10.5% 683 11.2% 534 12.3% 674 9.6% 3,615 11%

Complainant/victim/witness uncooperative 3,065 37.9% 2,581 36.7% 2,318 38.0% 1,748 40.2% 2,581 36.6% 12,293 38%

Complainant/victim/witness unavailable 1,082 13.4% 877 12.5% 747 12.2% 469 10.8% 1,270 18.0% 4,445 14%

Victim unidentified 77 1.0% 74 1.1% 57 0.9% 30 0.7% 54 0.8% 292 1%

Total Closed Cases 8,083 7,039 6,107 4,345 7,053 32,627

77.7%2,019 83%79.1%1,64687.7%

2012 Five-year Total2010 2011 20132009

83.3% 1,640 994

Five-year Total

* "Case Resolution Rate" is the percentage of all closed complaints that are resolved through either a full investigation or mediation. It excludes cases where a civilian withdrew his/her complaint, did not cooperate with

the investigation and/or was not available.

Allegations exonerated, unfounded, and/or

unsubstantiated

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

85.2%2,343


59/121

Table 24B: Dis position of All egations 2009-2013

Full Investigations

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent

Substantiated - Charges 311 3.1% 410 4.6% 251 3.7% 301 6.8% 479 6.3% 1,752 4.6%

Substantiated - Command discipline 93 0.9% 88 1.0% 56 0.8% 101 2.3% 133 1.7% 471 1.2%

Substantiated - Instructions 31 0.3% 21 0.2% 15 0.2% 14 0.3% 37 0.5% 118 0.3%

Substantiated - No Recommendation 13 0.1% 31 0.3% 13 0.2% 2 0.0% 14 0.2% 73 0.2%

Subtotal - Substantiated Allegations 448 4.4% 550 6.2% 335 4.9% 418 9.4% 663 8.7% 2,414 6.4%

Unfounded 1,548 15.3% 1,243 14.0% 789 11.5% 345 7.8% 481 6.3% 4 ,406 11.6%

Employee exonerated 3,360 33.1% 2,850 32.0% 2,163 31.6% 1,102 24.8% 1,850 24.3% 1 1,325 29. 9%

Subtotal - Findings on the Merits 5,356 52.8% 4,643 52.2% 3,287 48.1% 1865 42.0% 2994 39.3% 1 8,145 47. 8%

Unsubstantiated 3,706 36.5% 3,135 35.2% 2,721 39.8% 2,036 45.8% 3,666 48.1% 1 5,264 40. 2%

Department employee unidentified 930 9.2% 998 11.2% 748 10.9% 504 11.3% 832 10.9% 4,012 10.6%

Miscellaneous 150 1.5% 112 1.3% 80 1.2% 40 0.9% 126 1.7% 508 1.3%

Refer to IAB 1 0.0% 7 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 0.0%

Total 10,143 100% 8,895 100% 6,836 100% 4,445 100% 7,618 100% 37,937 100.0%

Mediation Closures Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number PercentMediated 251 59.9% 368 46.0% 302 37.8% 165 26.8% 286 32.8% 1,372 1.5%

Mediation attempted 168 40.1% 432 54.0% 496 62.2% 451 73.2% 586 67.2% 2133 2.3%

Total 419 100.0% 800 100.0% 798 100.0% 616 100.0% 872 100.0% 3505 3.8%

Other Dispositions Number

Percent of all

closures Number

Percent of all

closures Number

Percent of all

closures Number

Percent of all

closures Number

Percent of all

closures

Complaint withdrawn 2,078 8.7% 1,552 7.6% 1,372 8.1% 1,063 9.1% 1,307 7.0% 7,372 8.0%

Complainant/victim/witness uncooperative 8,583 35.8% 6,995 34.3% 6,070 36.0% 4,477 38.3% 6,439 34.2% 3 2,564 35. 5%

Complainant/victim/witness unavailable 2,466 10.3% 1,931 9.5% 1,646 9.7% 971 8.3% 2,406 12.8% 9,420 10.3%

Victim unidentified 301 1.3% 216 1.1% 162 1.0% 104 0.9% 161 0.9% 944 1.0%

Total 13,428 56.0% 10,694 52.4% 9,250 54.8% 6,615 56.7% 10,313 54.8% 50,300 54.8%

Total Closed Allegations 23,990 20,389 16,884 11,676 18,803 91,742

Five-year Total

Five-year Total2010 2011

2009 2012 2013

2012

2013 Five-year Total

2010 2011

2009

2009 2010 2011 2012

2013


60/121

Table 25: Disposition of Force Allegati ons 2009-2013

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Gun fired 3 5.4% 49 87.5% 1 1.8% 1 1.8% 1 1.8% 1 1.8%Gun pointed 10 1.2% 550 65.2% 145 17.2% 72 8.5% 58 6.9% 9 1.1%

Nightstick as club 16 2.3% 269 39.4% 152 22.3% 149 21.8% 88 12.9% 9 1.3%

Gun as club 1 1.7% 2 3.4% 24 41.4% 24 41.4% 5 8.6% 2 3.4%

Police shield 0 0.0% 14 45.2% 9 29.0% 4 12.9% 4 12.9% 0 0.0%

Vehicle 1 1.8% 7 12.7% 20 36.4% 25 45.5% 2 3.6% 0 0.0%

Other blunt instrument as club 4 2.8% 5 3.5% 51 36.2% 52 36.9% 26 18.4% 3 2.1%

Hit against inanimate object 5 1.8% 53 19.3% 108 39.3% 73 26.5% 33 12.0% 3 1.1%

Chokehold 9 1.9% 0 0.0% 206 44.6% 178 38.5% 62 13.4% 7 1.5%

Pepper spray 13 2.1% 443 71.9% 52 8.4% 53 8.6% 49 8.0% 6 1.0%

Physical force* 119 1.5% 3,738 48.4% 2,043 26.5% 1,055 13.7% 668 8.6% 100 1.3%

Radio as club 0 0.0% 3 3.9% 19 25.0% 42 55.3% 9 11.8% 3 3.9%

Flashlight as club 1 3.7% 2 7.4% 7 25.9% 11 40.7% 6 22.2% 0 0.0%

Handcuffs too tight 4 2.4% 5 3.0% 89 53.0% 48 28.6% 21 12.5% 1 0.6%

Nonlethal restraining device 1 1.6% 42 68.9% 3 4.9% 13 21.3% 0 0.0% 2 3.3%

Animal 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Other 2 3.4% 15 25.9% 14 24.1% 19 32.8% 8 13.8% 0 0.0%

Total 189 1.7% 5,197 45.9% 2,943 26.0% 1,819 16.0% 1,040 9.2% 146 1.3%

* "Physical force" includes: dragged/pulled, pushed/shoved/threw, beat, punched/kicked/kneed, slapped, fought, and bit.

Unfounded Of fi cer Un iden ti fi ed Mi sc el laneousType of Force Allegation

Substantiated Exon erated Unsubstant iat ed


61/121

Table 25A: Disposition of Force Allegations 2009




Gun as club 1 7.1% 0 0.0% 3 21.4% 9 64.3% 0 0.0% 1 7.1%

Police shield 0 0.0% 5 55.6% 2 22.2% 0 0.0% 2 22.2% 0 0.0%

Vehicle 0 0.0% 3 15.8% 8 42.1% 7 36.8% 1 5.3% 0 0.0%



Chokehold 3 2.5% 0 0.0% 45 37.5% 55 45.8% 17 14.2% 0 0.0%

Pepper spray 4 2.7% 116 77.3% 8 5.3% 16 10.7% 6 4.0% 0 0.0%

Physical force* 30 1.4% 1,002 47.6% 528 25.1% 336 16.0% 172 8.2% 36 1.7%

Radio as club 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 20.8% 14 58.3% 3 12.5% 2 8.3%


Handcuffs too tight 2 4.7% 2 4.7% 17 39.5% 14 32.6% 7 16.3% 1 2.3%Nonlethal restraining device 1 4.5% 13 59.1% 2 9.1% 5 22.7% 0 0.0% 1 4.5%

Animal 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Other 0 0.0% 7 33.3% 7 33.3% 6 28.6% 1 4.8% 0 0.0%

Total 54 1.8% 1,397 45.6% 732 23.9% 575 18.8% 251 8.2% 52 1.7%


Unfounded Officer Unidentified MiscellaneousType of Force Allegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated


62/121

Table 25B: Disposition of Force Allegations 2010




Gun as club 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 50.0% 5 41.7% 1 8.3% 0 0.0%

Police shield 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 3 50.0% 2 33.3% 0 0.0%

Vehicle 1 7.1% 2 14.3% 2 14.3% 9 64.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%



Chokehold 2 1.7% 0 0.0% 46 38.3% 57 47.5% 13 10.8% 2 1.7%

Pepper spray 6 3.8% 110 69.2% 9 5.7% 18 11.3% 14 8.8% 2 1.3%

Physical force* 27 1.4% 961 51.1% 409 21.7% 295 15.7% 175 9.3% 15 0.8%

Radio as club 0 0.0% 1 4.0% 6 24.0% 13 52.0% 4 16.0% 1 4.0%



Animal 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Other 1 8.3% 3 25.0% 2 16.7% 4 33.3% 2 16.7% 0 0.0%

Total 50 1.8% 1,298 47.1% 583 21.2% 531 19.3% 269 9.8% 25 0.9%





63/121

Table 25C: Disposition of Force Allegations 2011




Gun as club 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 27.3% 5 45.5% 3 27.3% 0 0.0%

Police shield 0 0.0% 3 60.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Vehicle 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 3 37.5% 4 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%



Chokehold 1 1.1% 0 0.0% 40 45.5% 37 42.0% 9 10.2% 1 1.1%

Pepper spray 3 2.4% 95 77.2% 3 2.4% 12 9.8% 8 6.5% 2 1.6%

Physical force* 6 0.4% 722 53.0% 313 23.0% 190 14.0% 116 8.5% 15 1.1%

Radio as club 0 0.0% 1 11.1% 4 44.4% 4 44.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%



Animal 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Other 0 0.0% 2 18.2% 2 18.2% 5 45.5% 2 18.2% 0 0.0%

Total 13 0.6% 1,030 50.1% 474 23.1% 337 16.4% 181 8.8% 21 1.0%


MiscellaneousType of Force Allegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified


64/121


65/121

Table 25E: Disposition of Force Allegations 2013




Gun as club 0 0.0% 2 14.3% 6 42.9% 5 35.7% 0 0.0% 1 7.1%

Police shield 0 0.0% 4 57.1% 3 42.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Vehicle 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Other blunt instrument as cl 1 2.6% 0 0.0% 18 47.4% 7 18.4% 11 28.9% 1 2.6%


Chokehold 2 2.3% 0 0.0% 54 61.4% 11 12.5% 17 19.3% 4 4.5%

Pepper spray 0 0.0% 76 65.0% 21 17.9% 5 4.3% 13 11.1% 2 1.7%

Physical force* 31 2.0% 661 43.2% 530 34.7% 151 9.9% 129 8.4% 27 1.8%

Radio as club 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 30.0% 5 50.0% 2 20.0% 0 0.0%


Handcuffs too tight 1 3.6% 1 3.6% 17 60.7% 5 17.9% 4 14.3% 0 0.0%

Nonlethal restraining device 0 0.0% 10 90.9% 0 0.0% 1 9.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Animal 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Other 1 10.0% 3 30.0% 1 10.0% 3 30.0% 2 20.0% 0 0.0%

Total 40 1.8% 930 41.8% 773 34.8% 224 10.1% 216 9.7% 40 1.8%





66/121

Table 26: Disposition of Abuse of Authority Allegations 2009-2013


Question and/or stop** 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0%

Question 89 15.1% 353 60.0% 95 16.2% 7 1.2% 37 6.3% 7 1.2%

Stop 506 18.0% 1,126 40.1% 824 29.4% 42 1.5% 275 9.8% 32 1.1%

Frisk and/or search* 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Search 244 11.2% 272 12.5% 1,228 56.2% 99 4.5% 308 14.1% 33 1.5%

Frisk 400 23.0% 489 28.2% 583 33.6% 37 2.1% 212 12.2% 15 0.9%

Vehicle search 153 12.5% 441 35.9% 489 39.9% 32 2.6% 95 7.7% 17 1.4%

Vehicle stop 67 8.7% 365 47.3% 254 32.9% 3 0.4% 72 9.3% 11 1.4%

Premises entered or searched 129 6.6% 1,344 68.7% 362 18.5% 32 1.6% 74 3.8% 16 0.8%

Strip search 27 3.9% 182 26.5% 337 49.1% 70 10.2% 57 8.3% 13 1.9%

Gun drawn 1 0.4% 186 65.5% 50 17.6% 25 8.8% 18 6.3% 4 1.4%

Property seized 5 5.1% 45 45.5% 25 25.3% 8 8.1% 15 15.2% 1 1.0%

Property damaged 7 1.4% 87 17.9% 200 41.2% 86 17.7% 101 20.8% 4 0.8%

Threat to notify ACS 2 1.9% 58 56.3% 29 28.2% 7 6.8% 7 6.8% 0 0.0%

Threat of force 35 2.6% 127 9.5% 744 55.5% 231 17.2% 182 13.6% 21 1.6%

Threat to damage/seize property 3 2.2% 38 27.9% 59 43.4% 12 8.8% 24 17.6% 0 0.0%Threat of arrest 41 2.9% 538 38.2% 545 38.7% 112 8.0% 147 10.4% 25 1.8%

Threat of summons 4 5.2% 20 26.0% 39 50.6% 5 6.5% 9 11.7% 0 0.0%

Retaliatory arrest 23 56.1% 5 12.2% 11 26.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 4.9%

Retaliatory summons 79 64.2% 14 11.4% 25 20.3% 5 4.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Refusal to process complaint 21 10.3% 15 7.4% 107 52.7% 20 9.9% 34 16.7% 6 3.0%

Refusal to give name/shield number 117 6.2% 34 1.8% 1161 61.1% 321 16.9% 242 12.7% 25 1.3%

Refusal to obtain medical treatment 18 4.1% 2 0.5% 253 57.2% 105 23.8% 59 13.3% 5 1.1%

Refusal to show search warrant*** 1 0.7% 3 2.0% 94 63.1% 29 19.5% 21 14.1% 1 0.7%

Improper dissemination of medical info 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Other 19 12.4% 52 34.0% 48 31.4% 15 9.8% 18 11.8% 1 0.7%

Total 1,991 10.5% 5,797 30.7% 7,562 40.0% 1,303 6.9% 2,007 10.6% 240 1.3%

* Beginning in 2005, the CCRB captured "frisk" and "search" as distinct allegations.

** Beginning in 2007, the CCRB captured "question" and "stop" as distinct allegations.*** The CCRB began to capture the allegation "refusal to show search warrant" on April 1, 2004.

Unfounded Officer Unidentified MiscellaneousType of Abuse of Authority Allegation



67/121

Table 26A: Disposition of Abuse of Authority Allegations 2009



Question 29 13.0% 148 66.4% 29 13.0% 3 1.3% 10 4.5% 4 1.8%

Stop 75 10.3% 385 53.1% 184 25.4% 17 2.3% 53 7.3% 11 1.5%


Search 51 9.1% 105 18.8% 289 51.6% 42 7.5% 64 11.4% 9 1.6%

Frisk 53 13.0% 162 39.8% 126 31.0% 13 3.2% 52 12.8% 1 0.2%

Vehicle search 30 8.7% 145 41.9% 120 34.7% 13 3.8% 29 8.4% 9 2.6%

Vehicle stop 16 6.7% 127 52.9% 67 27.9% 2 0.8% 22 9.2% 6 2.5%

Premises entered or searched 12 2.6% 359 76.5% 75 16.0% 8 1.7% 12 2.6% 3 0.6%

Strip search 5 2.6% 50 26.0% 83 43.2% 33 17.2% 16 8.3% 5 2.6%

Gun drawn 0 0.0% 51 63.0% 16 19.8% 10 12.3% 2 2.5% 2 2.5%

Property seized 3 7.3% 21 51.2% 8 19.5% 4 9.8% 5 12.2% 0 0.0%



Threat of force 3 0.9% 29 8.4% 188 54.3% 87 25.1% 34 9.8% 5 1.4%

Threat to damage/seize property 0 0.0% 12 26.7% 18 40.0% 7 15.6% 8 17.8% 0 0.0%

Threat of arrest 8 1.8% 203 45.4% 137 30.6% 54 12.1% 37 8.3% 8 1.8%









Other 2 4.2% 21 43.8% 11 22.9% 8 16.7% 5 10.4% 1 2.1%

Total 351 6.8% 1,908 36.9% 1,843 35.6% 524 10.1% 478 9.2% 73 1.4%


** Beginning in 2007, the CCRB captured "question" and "stop" as distinct allegations.*** The CCRB began to capture the allegation "refusal to show search warrant" on April 1, 2004.




68/121

Table 26B: Disposition of Abuse of Authority Allegations 2010



Question 13 9.0% 90 62.5% 24 16.7% 4 2.8% 10 6.9% 3 2.1%

Stop 109 17.0% 306 47.6% 148 23.0% 7 1.1% 70 10.9% 3 0.5%


Search 53 10.5% 63 12.4% 290 57.2% 21 4.1% 75 14.8% 5 1.0%

Frisk 83 22.1% 136 36.2% 107 28.5% 8 2.1% 37 9.8% 5 1.3%

Vehicle search 31 11.7% 102 38.3% 104 39.1% 8 3.0% 19 7.1% 2 0.8%

Vehicle stop 13 7.4% 101 57.7% 44 25.1% 1 0.6% 15 8.6% 1 0.6%


Strip search 8 5.3% 46 30.3% 58 38.2% 18 11.8% 18 11.8% 4 2.6%

Gun drawn 0 0.0% 29 55.8% 11 21.2% 6 11.5% 6 11.5% 0 0.0%

Property seized 1 3.6% 14 50.0% 6 21.4% 2 7.1% 5 17.9% 0 0.0%



Threat of force 13 3.9% 38 11.5% 158 47.7% 66 19.9% 50 15.1% 6 1.8%Threat to damage/seize property 0 0.0% 9 39.1% 9 39.1% 1 4.3% 4 17.4% 0 0.0%

Threat of arrest 11 3.3% 129 38.5% 112 33.4% 35 10.4% 42 12.5% 6 1.8%









Other 3 9.1% 15 45.5% 7 21.2% 4 12.1% 4 12.1% 0 0.0%

Total 449 10.3% 1,462 33.5% 1,552 35.5% 356 8.1% 500 11.4% 50 1.1%

* Beginning in 2005, the CCRB captured "frisk" and "search" as distinct allegations.** Beginning in 2007, the CCRB captured "question" and "stop" as distinct allegations.

*** The CCRB began to capture the allegation "refusal to show search warrant" on April 1, 2004.




69/121

Table 26C: Disposition of Abuse of Authority Allegations 2011



Question 8 10.3% 49 62.8% 11 14.1% 0 0.0% 10 12.8% 0 0.0%

Stop 88 16.1% 194 35.4% 186 33.9% 12 2.2% 57 10.4% 11 2.0%


Search 36 8.1% 47 10.6% 262 59.3% 20 4.5% 69 15.6% 8 1.8%

Frisk 77 21.2% 98 27.0% 128 35.3% 10 2.8% 47 12.9% 3 0.8%

Vehicle search 20 8.3% 86 35.5% 106 43.8% 5 2.1% 23 9.5% 2 0.8%

Vehicle stop 6 4.5% 72 54.5% 41 31.1% 0 0.0% 12 9.1% 1 0.8%


Strip search 4 3.4% 32 26.9% 65 54.6% 7 5.9% 9 7.6% 2 1.7%

Gun drawn 1 1.7% 50 86.2% 4 6.9% 1 1.7% 2 3.4% 0 0.0%

Property seized 0 0.0% 3 33.3% 5 55.6% 0 0.0% 1 11.1% 0 0.0%



Threat of force 4 1.7% 32 13.6% 124 52.5% 41 17.4% 32 13.6% 3 1.3%


Threat of arrest 3 1.5% 90 43.7% 72 35.0% 11 5.3% 27 13.1% 3 1.5%





Refusal to give name/shield numbe 8 2.5% 2 0.6% 212 66.3% 46 14.4% 46 14.4% 6 1.9%



Improper dissemination of medical i 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Other 6 27.3% 6 27.3% 5 22.7% 1 4.5% 4 18.2% 0 0.0%

Total 297 8.8% 1,058 31.4% 1,385 41.1% 203 6.0% 386 11.4% 43 1.3%


** Beginning in 2007, the CCRB captured "question" and "stop" as distinct allegations.


Unfounded Officer Unidentified MiscellaneousType of Abuse of Authority

Alleg ation



70/121

Table 26D: Disposition of Abuse of Authority Allegations 2012



Question 23 36.5% 24 38.1% 13 20.6% 0 0.0% 3 4.8% 0 0.0%

Stop 95 29.5% 72 22.4% 111 34.5% 3 0.9% 39 12.1% 2 0.6%


Search 28 10.6% 22 8.3% 160 60.6% 8 3.0% 42 15.9% 4 1.5%

Frisk 74 31.9% 30 0.0% 89 0.0% 1 0.0% 36 0.0% 2 0.0%

Vehicle search 20 15.6% 44 34.4% 50 39.1% 3 2.3% 10 7.8% 1 0.8%

Vehicle stop 10 14.9% 18 26.9% 29 43.3% 0 0.0% 9 13.4% 1 1.5%


Strip search 4 4.7% 27 31.8% 39 45.9% 9 10.6% 5 5.9% 1 1.2%

Gun drawn 0 0.0% 29 72.5% 5 12.5% 2 5.0% 3 7.5% 1 2.5%

Property seized 0 0.0% 2 33.3% 3 50.0% 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0%



Threat of force 10 6.1% 11 6.7% 95 57.9% 20 12.2% 26 15.9% 2 1.2%


Threat of arrest 11 6.9% 42 26.3% 79 49.4% 7 4.4% 19 11.9% 2 1.3%





Refusal to give name/shield numbe 15 6.9% 2 0.9% 155 71.1% 19 8.7% 25 11.5% 2 0.9%



Improper dissemination of medical i 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Other 2 11.8% 5 29.4% 10 58.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Total 338 15.5% 498 22.8% 971 44.5% 100 4.6% 256 11.7% 20 0.9%


** Beginning in 2007, the CCRB captured "question" and "stop" as distinct allegations.


MiscellaneousType of Abuse of Authority

Alleg ation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified


71/121

Table 26F: Disposition of Abuse of Authority Allegations 2013



Question 16 20.0% 42 52.5% 18 22.5% 0 0.0% 4 5.0% 0 0.0%

Stop 139 24.5% 169 29.8% 195 34.4% 3 0.5% 56 9.9% 5 0.9%


Search 76 18.5% 35 8.5% 227 55.2% 8 1.9% 58 14.1% 7 1.7%

Frisk 113 31.6% 63 17.6% 133 37.2% 5 1.4% 40 11.2% 4 1.1%

Vehicle search 52 21.2% 64 26.1% 109 44.5% 3 1.2% 14 5.7% 3 1.2%

Vehicle stop 22 13.9% 47 29.7% 73 46.2% 0 0.0% 14 8.9% 2 1.3%


Strip search 6 4.3% 27 19.6% 92 66.7% 3 2.2% 9 6.5% 1 0.7%

Gun drawn 0 0.0% 27 50.9% 14 26.4% 6 11.3% 5 9.4% 1 1.9%

Property seized 1 6.7% 5 33.

CCRBAnnual Appendix 2013

Documents