CCAFS-MOT Tool, March 2015

CCAFS – mitigation options toolDiana Feliciano, Dali Nayak, Sylvia

Vetter & Jon HillierUniversity of Aberdeen

Piracicaba 18.03.2015

Diana Feliciano

Education• 2003 Forestry (Forest Engineering) – 5 years Technical

University of Lisbon• 2008 MSc in Economics – Portuguese Catholic University• 2012 PhD in Geography– University of Aberdeen and JHI

Working path• Portuguese Catholic University, Porto – 2004-2007• Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Aberdeen – 2007-

2009• International Social Science Council, UNESCO, Paris – 2013• Research fellow – University of Aberdeen – 2013- current04/14/2023 Diana Feliciano 2

University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK (1945)

Mitigation options tool• Partnership between the CGIAR programme on

Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) & University of Aberdeen.

• This tool is still being developed;

• The CCAFS Mitigation Options Tool estimates GHGs emissions from multiple crop and livestock management systems in different world regions;

• To provide decision-makers reliable information needed to make science-informed decisions about emissions reductions from agriculture.

CGIAR goals: Reduce poverty, improve food and nutrition for health, improve ecosystems and services

CGIAR research programme (16 RP) on Climate Change, Agriculture, Food Security

• Research Themes:- Climate Smart Agricultural Practices- Climate Risk Management- Low Emissions Agriculture √- Gender and Equity- Policies and Institutions

GHG accounting tools

• Whittaker et al. (2013); Colomb et al. (2012) reviewed calculators

- CALM- Cool Farm Tool- C-Plan- COMET-Planner- AFOLU-Calculator - EX-ACT

What distinguishes the CCAFS tool?

- It estimates GHG emissions in several crops, rice and livestock X;

- It estimates the mitigation potential of several management options

√;

- It ranks the mitigation options according to their mitigation potential

√;

- It joins several empirical models to estimate GHG emissions √ .

General characteristics of the screening tool:- Excel-based tool;- Easy and quick to fill (5-10 minutes);- Easy to get the results.

Empirical models in the tool

Nitrous oxide emissions (e.g. maize)

•Stehfest & Bouwman (2006):

𝑳𝒐𝒈 (𝑵𝒆𝒎𝒊𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 )=𝑨+∑𝒊=𝟏

𝒏

𝑬𝒊

Climate Fertiliser

SOC

Crop type

Methane emissions in paddy riceYan et al. 2006

ln(flux) = constant + a × ln(SOC) + pHm + PWi + WTj + CLk +OMl

×ln (1+AOMl )

•SOC•Soil pH •Climate•Preseason water regime•Water regime of the growing season•Type and amount of organic fertiliser

Mitigacion options• We chose mitigation options that do not affect

crop production capacity (ongoing work):

Zero-tillage (e.g. maize)

Nitrification inhibitors

Manure

AgroforestryCover cropsFertiliser production

• CCAFS Mitigation Option Tool

Summary

• An Excel-based tool – can be used in any pc;• Uses empirical models different from IPCC factors;• Provides information about mitigation options

and their mitigation potential;• Maximum time required is 10 min;• Advanced and quick user - Accommodates a

range of users.• It is intended to help decision-makers

understanding GHG emissions mitigation.

Further work• Objectives CCAFS: Support better global

knowledge about GHG emissions and low emissions agriculture policy; Support South-South training.

• Quantifying livestock emissions (cattle and land use change);

• Socio-economic barriers to implementation of mitigation options;

• Links between mitigation and adaptation

Discussion

- What are the most important subsectors and practices represented? (e.g. for max emission reductions as well as decisions facing these groups)

- Is this information useful? - What is the desired degree of robustness? - What further information is needed? - Examples of decisions for which you could use this tool?- Which groups would be more interested in using the tool?- How to improve usability for the most relevant groups?- Leaflet CCAFS

Acknowledgements

• This work was undertaken as part of the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), which is a strategic partnership of CGIAR and Future Earth. This research was carried out with funding by the European Union (EU) and with technical support from the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). The views expressed in the document cannot be taken to reflect the official opinions of CGIAR, Future Earth, or donors.

Many thanks!!