OPPORTUNITIES IN UK EQUITY INCOME Matt Hudson, Fund Manager Cazenove UK Equity Income Fund For professional advisers only Citywire Wealth Manager Retreat October 2012
Nov 13, 2014
OPPORTUNITIES IN UK EQUITY INCOME
Matt Hudson, Fund Manager Cazenove UK Equity Income Fund
For professional advisers only
Citywire Wealth Manager Retreat October 2012
Agenda
• UK market overview
• The business cycle in 2012
• Key themes
• Portfolio activity
• Current portfolio positioning
• Outlook
- 1 -
• Challenging background;
low growth, austerity,
overleverage
• Fear of tail risks high
• Political interventions
have increased investor
uncertainty but…
• …UK equities now lowly
rated vs trend
- 2 -
UK market overview – 1970’s all over again
Source: Mirabaud at 30/06/12
UK Market: Trend P/E, 1973-2012
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
Jan-
73
Jan-
75
Jan-
77
Jan-
79
Jan-
81
Jan-
83
Jan-
85
Jan-
87
Jan-
89
Jan-
91
Jan-
93
Jan-
95
Jan-
97
Jan-
99
Jan-
01
Jan-
03
Jan-
05
Jan-
07
Jan-
09
Jan-
11
Tre
nd P
/E (
x)
Trend P/E (7% p.a. growth, Apr. '78 base) Ave. post-73 + 1 SD -1 SD
UK market price earnings multiple based on long-term trend earnings growth
UK equities have de-rated
Business cycle in theory
Slowdown
Recession Recovery
Expansion Expansion Slowdown
- 3 -
The business cycle is alive and well
Source: Cazenove Capital at 11/10/12
*Performance relative to FTSE 350 at 30/09/12
Business cycle in reality
Global industrial production - % change year on year
Business cycle style groupings Performance
year-to-date*
Commodity Cyclicals -12.2%
Industrial Cyclicals +9.7%
Consumer Cyclicals +20.2%
Financials +11.8%
Growth +4.5%
Growth Defensives +2.6%
Value Defensives -1.1% 90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125 UK market relative returns year to date
FTSE 100 +3.4%
FTSE 250 +17.1%
FTSE All-Share +5.6%
- 4 -
Where are we in the business cycle?
UK Markit Manufacturing PMI US ISM Manufacturing PMI
China Markit Manufacturing PMI
Source: Markit & Thomson Datastream at 28/09/12
Euro-area Markit Manufacturing PMI
- 5 -
Theme 1 – the bubble in security
Source: Morgan Stanley, Cazenove Capital at 26/09/12
• “Nifty Fifty”, a lesson from history
• Secure growth has re-rated over deep cyclicals/value stocks from 2007
• Driven by the search for safety…
• …and emerging market growth over developed market maturity
The “Nifty Fifty” beat the market by c.15% pa for 8 years Unilever price, relative performance and 2013 earnings forecasts
Theme 2 – yield at a premium
- 6 -
Source: Mirabaud at 31/08/12
Se
ve
rn T
ren
t (V
alu
e D
efe
ns
ive
)
Ba
rcla
ys
(F
ina
nc
ial)
• “High volatility” stock de-rated is
the opposite side of the trade
• Value opportunities
• Investors mistaking “low volatility”
for growth
• “Secure” dividend stocks squeezed
upwards
• Value traps
Trend P/E relative
Average
+SD
-SD
- 7 -
Theme 3 – a preference for consumer cyclicals
UK corporate margins near record levels Credit easing for consumers
12
14
16
18
20
22
93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11E12E13E
Market ex Financials ex Commodities - EBITDA Margin
Source: Citigroup at 31/12/11, Deutsche Bank at 24/09/12
• Further margin gains more challenging… • Outlook for consumers improving
Theme 4 - dividend recovery
• Dividend recovery underway
• UK dividend growth 2012 / 2013 circa
6-7%
• Dividend growth stocks re-rating
• Special dividend enhancements
- 8 -
Dividend surprises performance
Source: MSDW/Datastream, FTSE, Global Financial Data, Morgan Stanley Research, Shore Capital at 30/05/12
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
Jan-73 Jan-77 Jan-81 Jan-85 Jan-89 Jan-93 Jan-97 Jan-01 Jan-05 Jan-09
FTSE All Share - DPS Growth (YoY %)
Portfolio strategy – activity in 2012
• Preference for Consumer Cyclicals with
pricing power – added to Easyjet,
Howden Joinery
• Leading indicators turning up – new
holdings in early-cycle Industrial
Cyclicals – GKN, Premier Farnell
• Policy action (OMT, QE3) prompts move
towards neutral in Financials, increased
exposure in Life Assurance and Other
Financials (Aviva, Jupiter)
• Reduced highly-rated Growth Defensives
and “Safety” stocks – exited United
Utilities, Diageo
- 9 -
Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream at 28/09/12
Aviva (Financial) performance relative to FTSE All-Share
Diageo (Growth Defensive) performance relative to
FTSE All-Share
Buying
Sold
- 10 -
Portfolio strategy – active positions
Source: Cazenove Capital Management at 05/10/12
Market Cap Exposures (%) Index Portfolio
FTSE 100 84.7% 61.8%
FTSE 250 13.0% 30.4%
FTSE Small Cap 2.2% 1.4%
AIM - 0.3%
Ex Index - 1.9%
Cash - 4.2%
Portfolio Risk
Predicted Tracking error p.a. 4.5%
Beta 0.9
# of stocks 56
Underweight Market Overweight
-6.16% HSBC
-4.74% BP
-4.55% Royal Dutch Shell A
-3.34% Royal Dutch Shell B
-2.59% Diageo
-1.59% Unilever
-1.48% SAB Miller
-1.47% Tesco
-1.57% Standard Chartered
-2.32% BHP Billiton
easyJet +1.77%
Legal & General +1.67%
Hargreaves Lansdown +1.67%
BT Group +1.66%
WPP +1.66%
Resolution +1.65%
Jupiter +1.64%
Elementis 1.51%
Barclays +1.50%
Imperial Tobacco +1.49%
- 11 -
Change over 12
months vs FTSE
All-share
Fund % Index % Key income portfolio
holdings
Commodity Cyclicals -6.0% 26.2 Rio Tinto
Consumer Cyclicals +19.5% 5.2 easyJet
Industrial Cyclicals +21.2% 5.9 Melrose
Financials +8.2% 17.8 Aviva
Other/Cash/ Unallocated = 4.2 Cineworld
Growth +2.0% 4.3 Sage
Growth Defensives +8.4% 9.2 Babcock
Value Defensives -6.3% 27.3 GlaxoSmithKline
13.7
8.1
11.7
16.8
8.4
2.9
31.9
Portfolio strategy – business cycle style tilts
Overweight Underweight Neutral / NA
6.5
Source: Cazenove Capital Management 05/10/12
Summary and outlook
• Despite abundant liquidity, growth
still weak and volatile…
• …but leading indicators and
economic surprise indicators
improving
• UK market attractively valued on PE
and yield with dividend growth
robust
• Overall portfolio balanced position,
preference for Consumer Cyclicals
and adding to Financials
- 12 -
Source: MSDW/Datastream, FTSE, Global Financial Data, Morgan Stanley Research, Shore Capital,
BofA Merril Lynch Global Equity Strategy, Bloomberg at 01/09/2012
Central bank liquidity versus US GDP
Appendix
- 14 -
Fund – dividends and income returns
Year Dividend distributions
(net)
2007 4.39p
2008 5.12p
2009 4.84p
2010 4.55p
2011 4.86p
Source: Cazenove Capital Management
Fund income return
5 yrs cumulative
FTSE All-Share return
5 yrs cumulative
24.4% 19.71%
5 years ended 31 December 2011 (B Income class)
Cazenove UK Equity Income Fund
Share Class Bloomberg
Ticker Lipper Codes
A Inc CAZUEAI LN 65000477
B Inc CAZUEBI LN 65000481
X Inc CAZUKEX LN 65000480
X Acc CAZUKXA LN 68150522
- 15 -
The Cazenove UK Equity Income Fund – summary
Internal Performance Objective:
“The Fund aims to outperform by 1.5% over rolling 3 year periods and achieve a minimum yield
of 110% of the benchmark yield”
Benchmark FTSE All-Share Index
Number of stocks Current 56, minimum 35
Portfolio Restrictions
(Rel to FTAS)
Stock +5% / No minimum
Sector +10 / No minimum
50% max weight in mid-cap,10% max in
small/ AIM/ other
(+ minimum 80% in UK Equities)
Tracking Risk 4-8% target range, current 4.5%
Launch Date 6 May 2005
Fund Size £133m
Structure UK Domiciled, UCITS III
Base Currency £ (Sterling)
Historic Yield 3.9%
• Pragmatic income
• Income and Capital returns
• Business cycle approach
• Focused portfolio
• Top decile 1, 3 and 5 years*
*Source. Cazenove Capital Management, fund ranking in Lipper UK Equity Income universe as at 24/09/12
- 16 -
Income strategy – through the cycle
Market yield &
dividend growth Dividend growth
Slowdown Recession Recovery Expansion
High yield Low / no yield,
high capital growth
Stock:
Delivers:
Cycle:
- 17 -
Source: Cazenove Capital, Datastream
• 3 “cogs”, portfolio allocations change through the cycle to deliver income and capital returns
Income investing – focus on total returns
Premium
Income
Capital
Returns
Superior Dividend
Growth
- 18 -
Cazenove UK Equity Income Fund – portfolio through the cycle
December
2005
December
2006
December
2007
December
2008*
December
2009
December
2010
December
2011
Premium real yields 44 49 68 86 60 54 55
Superior dividend growth 37 30 21 6 10 20 30
Capital Returns 19 21 11 8 30 26 15
No of stocks 69 78 58 51 68 57 52
Source: Cazenove Capital Management at 31/07/12
*cash 4.7% at year end 2008
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Acti
ve w
eig
ht
(%)
Business cycle (+ve) active weights for Cazenove UK Equity Income
Commodity Cyclical Consumer Cyclical Financial Growth
Growth Defensive Industrial Cyclical Value Defensive
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Acti
ve w
eig
ht
(%)
Business cycle (-ve) active weights for Cazenove UK Equity Income
Commodity Cyclical Consumer Cyclical Financial Growth
Growth Defensive Industrial Cyclical Value Defensive
Total returns – the power of compounding
0.86
0.42
-0.70
5.51
4.03
2.67
-1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00Capital Return % (Annualised)
Total Return % (Annualised)
FTSE All-Share
*Source: Cazenove Capital 24.09.2012
**Source: Lipper, Dec 2005 – July 2012
Annualised returns**
?
• Interim 2012 dividend + 6% year on year
Cazenove UK Equity
Income B Inc IMA UK Equity
Income Sector
What we know - income reinvested outperforms
over the long term*
- 19 -
- 20 -
Fund manager: Matt Hudson
MATTHEW HUDSON joined Cazenove in 2001. He is a member of the Pan-European equity team with responsibility for
equity income portfolios. He is manager of the Cazenove UK Equity Income Fund and The Equity Income Trust for
Charities, a UK authorised Common Investment Fund and he is responsible for the following UK sectors: Banks,
Construction & Materials, Gas Water & Multi Utilities, Mining and Electricity. Matthew joined from AIB Govett Investment
Management where he was a UK equity fund manager. Prior to this he was a chartered accountant at
PricewaterhouseCoopers in the financial services division. Matthew graduated from Cambridge University with a degree in
History. Matthew has 13 years of investment experience
Source: Citywire at 28/09/12
- 21 -
Pan-European Equity Team
Chris Rice
Head of Pan European Equities
All team members have sector research responsibilities as well as product responsibilities
Social environment and ethical (SEE) research is integrated into our mainstream investment process – in addition we have 2 SRI analysts.
UK Europe
Steve Cordell (UK Absolute)
Julie Dean (UK Equity)
Matthew Hudson (UK Equity Income)
Paul Marriage (UK Smaller Companies)
John Warren (UK Smaller Companies)
David Docherty (UK Equity)
Wade Pollard (UK Equity)
Chris Rice (Europe Ex UK)
Steve Cordell (Pan Europe)
Lionel Rayon (Pan Europe, High Alpha)
Kuldip Shergill (Pan Europe, High Alpha)
James Sym (Europe Ex UK)
UK equities research responsibilities
- 22 -
Steve Cordell
• Technology Hardware
Julie Dean
• General Financial
• Healthcare Equipment
• Life Insurance
• Non-Life Insurance
• Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology
• Software & Computer Services
David Docherty
• Aerospace & Defence
• Automobile & Parts
• Electronic & Electrical Equipment
• Forestry & Paper
• General Industrials
• Industrial Engineering
• Industrial Metals
• Oil & Gas Producers
• Oil Equipment & Services
Charlotte Morrish
• Beverages
• Food & Drug Retailers
• Food Producers
• General Retailers
• Household Goods - Personal
• Media
• Personal Goods
• Travel & Leisure
John Warren
• Support Services – ex FTSE 100
• Travel & Leisure
Paul Marriage
• Smaller Companies
Wade Pollard
• Household Goods - Housebuilders
• Industrial Transportation
• Real Estate
• Support Services – FTSE 100
• Telecoms
• Tobacco
Matthew Hudson
• Banks
• Chemicals
• Construction & Materials
• Electricity
• Gas, Water & Multi-Utilities
• Mining
• Software & Computer Services
• Sector market divides are not homogenous. They do not necessarily help us determine the
behaviour of these stocks within the cycle.
• Define the beta of stocks and allocate them to seven style groupings:
- 23 - - 23 -
Business cycle investing – market analysis
Commodity Cyclicals Growth Financials Growth Defensives
Consumer Cyclicals Value Defensives
Industrial Cyclicals
HIGHER BETA LOWER BETA
• Pragmatic approach combining top-down macro view with earnings based security selection
• Avoid permanent style / size bias
• Demand for products and services changes throughout the business cycle
• Operational gearing of companies impacts profitability of companies
- 24 - - 24 -
• Commodity Cyclicals – stocks whose revenues are linked either directly or indirectly to a
particular commodity product such as oil, steel, gas, mining, bulk chemicals e.g. BP, Rio Tinto
• Consumer Cyclicals – cyclical stocks which rely on consumer spending for their revenues e.g.
retailers, automotives, house builders, leisure, general retail e.g. Marks & Spencer, Easyjet
• Industrial Cyclicals – stocks which manufacture capital goods or which have revenues linked to
industrial production e.g. engineering, aerospace, construction e.g. GKN, Cookson
• Growth – stocks which grow revenues well in excess of GDP with a high degree of uncertainty or
volatility e.g. luxury goods, medical technology, IT e.g. Smith and Nephew, ARM Holdings
• Financials/Interest Rate Sensitive – stocks whose business depends on interest rate spreads,
financial markets and asset valuations e.g. banks, insurers, real estate e.g. Barclays, Land
Securities
• Growth Defensives – stocks which grow revenues in excess of GDP with a low volatility and
high visibility e.g. support services, food retailers e.g. Pearson, Compass group
• Value Defensives – stocks which grow revenues at or below GDP with low volatility and high
visibility e.g. telecommunications, pharmaceuticals, utilities, food producers, beverages, tobacco,
e.g. GlaxoSmithKline, Vodafone
Business cycle investing - seven style groupings
- 25 -
Business cycle investing - horses for courses
*Source: Thomson Datastream
Stock Sector Style
Performance relative to FTSE All-Share*
31/12/99 –
12/03/03
12/03/03 –
15/06/07
15/06/07 –
03/03/09
03/03/09 –
30/04/12
Morgan Crucible Electronic &
Electrical Cyclical -74% +272% -42% +129%
Bodycote Industrial
Engineering Cyclical -55% +114% -26% +120%
Cookson General Industrials Cyclical -80% +98% -78% +246%
Diageo Beverages Defensive +147% -17% +40% 19%
Unilever Food Producers Defensive +178% -35% +57% -2%
Reed Elsevier Media Defensive +72% -23% +43% -38%
- 26 - - 26 -
History and background
Cazenove played an important
part in most of the British
Government’s privatisation
issues. As the only major
independent firm in London, it
successfully built its business
both domestically and
internationally.
The fund management business
was separately incorporated in
1988.
By the 1940s the business had
become one of the City of
London’s pre-eminent
stockbroking partnerships.
Cazenove began investing on
behalf of pension funds and
private individuals in 1945.
1930s 1980s
The firm changed from a
partnership to corporate status
in April 2001.
In 2005 Cazenove and
JPMorgan formed a joint
venture with respect to their UK
investment banking activities.
Cazenove Capital Management
demerged from the Cazenove
Group to create an
independent asset
management business.
2000s
The origins of Cazenove can
be traced to the early
Huguenot financiers who left
France in the late
seventeenth century.
In 1819 Phillip Cazenove
joined the business of his
brother-in-law John Menet: in
1823 they became partners,
and the firm of Cazenove
was established.
1823
- 27 -
Funds under management - £15.9 billion
Investment Funds
Long only funds £3.3bn
Long/short funds £0.3bn
Sub-advisory £0.5bn
Wealth Management
Private Clients £8.6bn
Charities £3.2bn
TOTAL £4.1bn
TOTAL £11.8bn
As at 31/07/12
Equities £6.3bn
Cash & Bonds £3.5bn
Multi-Manager £4.5bn
Hedge Funds £1.3bn
Other Alternatives £0.3bn
TOTAL £15.9bn
Asset Class
Funds under management
Wealth management £11.8bn
Investments Funds £4.1bn
TOTAL £15.9bn
- 28 -
Company information
Fully diluted share capital
Employees under
Option 14.39%
Cazenove Capital Other
Other individual
holders 63.45%
Institutions
2.77%
Employees 19.39%
Source: Cazenove Capital Management, December 2011
- 29 - - 29 -
Issued by Cazenove Capital Management which is the name under which Cazenove Capital Management
Limited and Cazenove Investment Fund Management Limited both authorised and regulated by the Financial
Services Authority provide investment products and services. Past performance should not be seen as an
indication of future performance. The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as
up and an investor may not get back the amount originally invested and may be affected by fluctuations in
exchange rates. The levels and bases of tax assumptions may change. This document is for information
purposes only and does not constitute an offer to enter into any contract/agreement nor is it a solicitation to buy
or sell any investment or to provide any services referred to therein. This document is intended for Independent
Financial Advisers, Professional Intermediaries and non-private clients only.
Telephone calls may be recorded for training and monitoring purposes.
Regulatory information and risk warnings