-
Caterpillar
428E Backhoe Loader vsJCB 3CX Backhoe Loader
Caterpillar Product Information
Feature ComparisonNovember 2005
For Dealer Sales PersonnelThis document supplements information
in the Specalog. Marketing content will be availableonly on secured
dealer extranets and by accessing the PDF in the Sales Library on
FlashNet.
-
2 Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Summary
This document is designed to compare some of the features ofthe
Caterpillar 428E versus the JCB 3CX Backhoe Loaders. It is intended
as a tool to be used by the Dealer when sellingagainst JCB,
highlighting the important Caterpillar designadvantages and how
they provide a solution to the wants andneeds of the increasingly
demanding backhoe loader customer.The document also highlights
perceived deficiencies of the JCB 3CX.
Chassis 3 - 8 Side Rails Stabilizers Tool & Battery Storage
Hydraulic Tank Electrical System Boom Transport Lock
Powertrain & Hydraulics 9 - 12 Engine Hydraulic System Front
Axle 20" Tire Option Lift Arms & Bucket
Loader 13 - 15 Durability Visibility
Backhoe 16 - 19 Excavator Style Boom Extendible Stick Bucket
Linkage Visibility
Operator Environment 20 - 23 Operator Station Personal Storage
Controls & Operation Security
Serviceability 24 - 29 Daily Checks Engine Bay Front Axle &
Drive Shafts Hydraulic Filter Cylinders Stabiliser Wearpads
Performance Comparison 30
Brief Specifications 31
-
Chassis
Slide-RailsAdvantage:The backhoe on the 428E side-shifts on a
flat rail without the needfor running channels.
Conclusions:The channels which the 3CX slide frame travels in
are prone tosignificant dirt ingress during trench work. This can
result indifficulty when trying to side-shift the machine, with the
operatorhaving to constantly clean the running channels. The
Caterpillarmachine side-shifts without the need for such runners
and istherefore free of these problems.
3Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
3CX
428E
3CX
-
4 Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Chassis
Stabilisers Advantage:The 428E is designed with large stabilizer
feet which can befitted with bolt-on reversible two piece street
pads to preventdamage to asphalt surfaces. The stabiliser system
also includesbuilt-in lock valves as standard.
The 428E stabiliser leg also includes a clean-out slot as
astandard feature.
Conclusions:The larger stabiliser feet on the 428E provide lower
groundpressure and more machine support. This is beneficial
whenworking on soft ground, where the JCB foot will be more
likelyto sink in.
The street pads protect road surfaces from damage when
thestabilisers are deployed. Being two-piece and reversible,
thepads can also be easily replaced or reversed to prolong their
lifespan. The optional pads on the 3CX are manufactured from
ansofter compound that wears down more easily. They are
alsonon-reversible and require more frequent and
costlyreplacements.
The lock valve system on the 428E is incorporated into thedesign
and steel tubes are used throughout. The JCB system has bolt on
additional valves, which are only fitted in territorieswhere they
are required by law.
The clean-out slot in the stabiliser leg is now included on all
E-series machines. This allows the operator to easily clean outdirt
an debris which can accumulate up inside the inner leg. The JCB leg
does not have this feature, which can lead to thetrapped material
becoming packing in hard and causing damageto the stabiliser
cylinders.
428E
3CX
-
5Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Chassis
Tool & Battery StorageAdvantage:The 428E has a large
combined tool storage and battery box. It iseasily accessible for
the operator. A heavy duty two-battery optionis available.
Conclusions:The Caterpillar operator benefits from the
reassurance that he hasstorage space all of his tools, chains, pins
etc. A 3CX owner mayhave to leave some of those tools at home, or
longer tools, such asa Backhoe Quick Coupler Release Bar, rolling
around on the cabfloor.
Stowage space on the JCB is limited by the close proximity of
thehydraulic tank, which also limits how wide the lid can be
opened,restricting access to an already small toolbox.
The battery on the JCB is located in the front of the
machine,behind the grill. This makes replacing the battery an
awkward job,especially if the lift arms are down. On the
Caterpillar machine,the batteries can always be easily access as
they are located in thecombined pannier mounted tool and battery
storage box.
3CX
428E
428E
3CX 3CX
-
6 Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Chassis
Hydraulic Tank Advantage:The Hydraulic Tank in the 428E is
mounted up inside theloader tower. The tank on the JCB is a pannier
tank mounted on the LHS of the machine chassis
Conclusions:The Caterpillar design has the hydraulic tank out of
harms way.It also provides a positive head of oil for the hydraulic
pump.The tank on the JCB is more vulnerable. The sight gauge
isexposed and could be damage by the operator when getting inand
out of the cab, or by debris trapped between the sight gaugeand the
tool box lid.. The lines into the tank are exposedunderneath and
could be damaged on site. Also, the steps in thehydraulic and fuel
tanks are rigidly mounted and could damagethe tanks, if impacted on
the jobsite. By contrast, the E-seriessteps are designed to bend
and not damage the tanks, if impacted on site.
3CX
428E
-
7Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Advantage:Electrical harnesses on the 428E are fully braided for
durabilityand use connectors sealed against dust and water ingress.
Allelectrical circuits are colour coded for easy trouble shooting
andall fuses are located neatly in one area. A 120 amp alternator
isfitted to the 428E as standard.
Conclusions:Harnesses on the JCB are either protected by plastic
ribbedconduit or not at all. This design is not as durable as the
braidedharnesses on the 428E and does not offer the same level
ofprotection against damage on the jobsite. JCB harnesses use the
same colour wire for all circuits. The circuit number is printed in
the wire. This makes electricaltroubleshooting more difficult.The
JCB has two alternator options: a 75 amp alternator is fitted
asstandard and an optional 85 map alternator is available when
aTurbocharged engine is fitted. This larger alternator is still
smallerthan the 120 amp fitted to the 428E and may not provide
sufficientcharging when working in winter with all the lights and
heater etc.turned on.
Chassis
Electrical System
3CX
428E
-
8 Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Chassis
Boom Transport Lock Advantage:The 428E has a boom transport lock
system which can beoperated at any point in the backhoe swing
range.
Conclusions:The boom lock system on the 428E be engaged and
dis-engaged at any swing angle.
The system on the JCB can only be activated when the backhoe is
directly in line with the machine axis. This prevents the operator
from safely locking the boom up,unless in a predetermined
position.
3CX
3CX
3CX
-
9Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Powertain & Hydraulics
EngineAdvantage:The 428E is available with a choice of engine: a
67 kW (Net)engine is fitted as standard, while a 73 kW (Net) engine
isavailable as an option.
Conclusions:The choice of engine option on the 428E allows the
customer tospecify the machine to more exacting requirements. The
3CX alsohas two engine options. The first is a Naturally Aspirated
59.8 kW(Net), while a 64.5 kW (Net) Turbocharged engine is
available asan option.
Comparing the Standard and Optional engine selections on the two
machines shows that the 428E has more power in both cases.This will
make the 428E more productive on the jobsite andprovide better hill
climbing ability when roading, providing fastertravelling between
jobsites.
-
10 Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Powertain & Hydraulics
Hydraulic System Advantage:The hydraulic system on the 428E
utilises a load sensing closedcentre system. Hydraulic power is
provided by a load sensing,variable displacement, axial piston
pump. The valves are flowsharing, which makes operating multiple
functions much easier.
Conclusions:The Caterpillar system reacts to the demand that is
required by the implements, adjusting the flow and pressure
providedaccordingly. This leads to full hydraulic power at any
givenengine speed, allowing delicate operations where
precisemodulation yet powerful forces are required. The flow
sharingvalves ensure that all services receive the oil they require
andresults in very smooth modulation of multiple functions,without
any one function stalling out.
The load sensing system on the 428E ensures that hydraulic oil
is not constantly circulating through the hydraulic lines
andfilters. This greatly reduces parasitic loads on the engine
andleads to reduced fuel consumption, improved hydraulic
filterperformance and longer hydraulic oil life.
The JCB 3CX uses an open centre hydraulic system suppliedby a
twin section gear pump. In this system, oil is constantlyflowing
though the lines and filters. This has the effect ofplacing
parasitic losses on the engine and creating excess heatand noise.
This will lead to increased fuel consumption, shorterfilter service
life and faster breakdown of the hydraulic oil,reducing the
interval between oil changes. This also meansmore wear and tear on
the engine and hydraulic pump andhigher demands placed on the
cooling system.
Greater hydraulic efficiency is achieved on the 428E
bydelivering the required flow and pressure on demand. This also
leads to more controllability, a clear advantage when excavating in
tight areas or close to services.
-
11Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Powertain & Hydraulics
Front AxleAdvantage:The front axle differential on the 428E is
mounted centrally. On the 3CX, the differential is offset to the
right.
Conclusions:The offset and angled position of the 3CX front
driveshaft can leadto excessive vibration and limited driveshaft
component life.Mounting the differential centrally removes this
risk. The JCBfront driveshaft is also unprotected, compared to the
428E whichbenefits from an optional, durable transmission
guard.
The front axle on the 428E is also sealed and lubricated for
life,unlike the axle on the JCB.
3CX
428E
428E
-
12 Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Powertain & Hydraulics
20" Tyre Option Advantage:The 428E is available with 20 front
tyres which allow betterflotation on soft sites.
Conclusions:The JCB is also available with 20 front tyres.
However, thesetyres restrict the turning circle of the machine,
leading toreduced manoeuvrability. The turning circle is reduced by
asmuch as 30%. On the 428E, there is no loss of turning circlewith
20 front tyres, allowing the operator to retain
maximummanoeuvrability.
3CX428E
-
13Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Loader
Lift Arms & BucketAdvantage:The 428E is fitted with a
Parallel Lift Loader as standard.Maximum bucket capacity is 1.03
m3.
Conclusions:The 3CX has a parallel lift loader, which offers the
sameperformance benefits as on the 428E. However, the 428Edesign is
more productive, with larger pins and cylinders,providing increased
performance and durability.
The JCB bucket design uses thinner plates for the side
platesthan the Caterpillar design. Thicker side plates result in
greaterwear resistance, providing a much more durable bucket
withlonger service life.
12.4mm
10.4mm
50.75mm
39.87mm
3CX
428E
428E
3CX
-
14 Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Loader
Durability Advantage:The Caterpillar bucket features thicker
bucket mounting plates,and XT3 hoses rather than the JCBs metallic
tubes used for theMP bucket cylinder lines.
Conclusions:Thicker plates contribute to a greater resistance to
bending whenloading the bucket or lifting uneven weights. This
contributes to a more robust, hard wearing bucket.
The XT3 hoses and bolt on tubes throughout,
improveserviceability. Using hoses on the rear of the loader
bucketreduces the risk of leaks due to impact damage from
overspill.3CX
428E
428E
428E
3CX
3CX
-
15Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Loader
Advantage:The 428E offers the operator good visibility to the
loaderbucket. Four adjustable front work lights are available.
Conclusions:The narrow hood on the 428E is clear of
obstructions. This,along with the divergent lift arms, a large area
front windscreenand a narrow front console, results in a clear line
of sight to thebucket for the operator.
On the JCB, visibility is reduced by the air inlet bowl on
thehood and the tilt cylinder links. The arms are not diverging
andthe windscreen is much smaller than on the 428E. The
operatormust move around in the seat more to see the bucket,
leading tomore fatigue.
When working at night, the operator can adjust the position
ofthe front worklights on the 428E to suit the jobsite. On the3CX,
the worklights are fixed and cannot be adjusted.
Visibility
428E
428E
3CX
3CX
-
16 Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Backhoe
Advantage:The 428E utilises the proven Caterpillar
excavator-style boom.Improvements with the E-series includes an
excavator style noseand a combined cylinder mount pin for improved
performance.
Conclusions:The excavator-style boom allows additional clearance
whenreaching over obstacles and the ability to dig closer to
themachine. The 3CX boom has a very deep and straight profile.This
makes it more difficult to dig over obstacles than with the428E.
This also makes excavating and dumping close to the truckvery
difficult, as is common on road works.
Excavator-Style Boom
428E
3CX
-
17Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Backhoe
Advantage:The E-stick on the 428E features an outer-sliding
extension,with serrations for improved clamping incorporated into
thedesign.
Conclusions:The outer sliding extension keeps the wear pads and
runningsurfaces clean and away from the material being excavated.
On the JCB, any material being clamped in the bucket isclamped
against the sliding rails of the extension. This canresult in
damage to the running surfaces and material beingdragging back into
the wearpads. Both conditions will result inan increased wear rate
on the pads and reduced service life.
The serrations on the 428E E-stick also allows the operator
toclamp material without the risk of damage to the stick or theneed
for a thumb.
Extendible Stick
428E
3CX
-
18 Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Backhoe
Advantage:The 428E has a high rotation linkage which has 205 of
bucketrotation with a single pin position. The JCB has only 201
ofbucket rotation, with two pin positions.
Conclusions:The high rotation linkage on the 428E allows easy
bucketclamping, longer flat bottom trenches, and deeper vertical
trenchend walls. This is not achievable on the 3CX, which only
has201 of rotation. This results in less machine repositioning
withthe 428E and no need to adjust the linkage for speed or
powerwhen moving from job to job.
Bucket Linkage
428E 3CX
-
19Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Backhoe
Advantage:The 428E boasts superior visibility to the backhoe
bucketthrough large, fully opening windows. Four adjustable
rearworklights are available for working at night.
Conclusions:The 428E boom is of a narrow fabricated design which
is255mm wide. By comparison, the boom on the 3CX is 412 mmin width.
This narrow design ensures great visibility to thebucket throughout
the operating range.
Visibility is further aided through the use of large
windows,both at the rear and on the sides of the cab. Tall side
windowsallow the operator to see the area immediately adjacent to
themachine. Visibility in this area is hampered on the JCB due
toshorter side windows and wide rear fenders.
At the rear on the JCB, visibility is also obscured by the
screenwiper motor unit, when the window is closed.
On the 428E, two of the rear worklights are positioned on
theside of the cab. This allows the operator to see clearly
thoughtthe full swing range, when working at night. The lights on
the3CX do not have as much side adjustment, restricting
theoperators visibility in the dark.
Visibility
428E
428E
428E3CX
3CX
3CX
3CX
428E
-
20 Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Cab & Operator Environment
Advantage:The 428E has a large spacious cab, with wide opening
doors andwindows. This, along with an Air Suspension Seat as
standard andexcellent ventilation makes the Caterpillar cab a
comfortablework environment.
Conclusions:The Caterpillar machine offers the operator a
considerably morespacious cab than the JCB. The cab on the 3CX can
give theoperator a feeling of being squeezed in.
Ventilation is excellent: all side windows can be opened,
unlikethe JCB which uses a flimsy catch to hold the whole door ajar
toprovide fresh air for the operator.
The standard air suspension seat can accommodate all
operatorscomfortably, without the need for manual adjustment like
the3CX. Also, there is not much room in the JCB cab when
spinningthe seat to the backhoe working position.
The one-piece rear window on the JCB limits operator
headroom,especially when wearing a helmet. The single pane of glass
canalso prove to be cumbersome to move. The two section windowon
the 428E offers rain protection and ventilation options andmuch
more headroom for the operator.
Operator Station
428E
3CX
428E
-
21Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Cab & Operator Environment
Advantage:The E-series cab provides ample space for the operator
to storepersonal possessions whilst at work.
Conclusions:The 428E cab offers the operator lockable
compartments, as wellas a flask holder and a number of areas for
storing loose items.The 3CX only offers a single compartment, which
cannot belocked and a flask holder that cannot be used when stowing
abeacon in the cab.
Personal Storage
428E 428E
3CX 3CX
-
22 Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Cab & Operator Environment
Advantage:The machine controls and switches in the 428E cab are
laid out inlogical and ergonomic locations, allowing precise
modulation.Every switch and lever falls easily to hand and is
clearly labelled.
Conclusions:The control layout in the Caterpillar cab results in
a machine thatis easy to drive. The gauges on the RH panel cover
vital machinesystems and provide more information on machine health
than onthe JCB. All the switches on the RH panel are logically
placedand well spaced. Compare this to the JCB RH console:
theswitches are all squeezed together, are not in a logical order
andthe panel does not have any spare switch locations for
customerand dealer options
The backhoe controls have been located such that the operator
can easily set-up for backhoe work. On the JCB, the operatormust
reach over the back of the seat to operate the stabilisers. This is
made more difficult by the headrest on the seat. The boomlock
control on the JCB is also awkward to operate and usuallyquite
stiff.
The radio position on the JCB is a reliability concern.
Beingupward facing, it is prone to dust ingress, which may cause
apremature failure. By comparison, the radio in the 428E cab
ispositioned neatly in the headliner.
Controls & Operation
3CX
-
23Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Cab & Operator Environment
Advantage:The 428E has an optional built-in vandal guard and
optionalMachine Security System (MSS). The MSS system iscompliant
to UK PTAG requirements and can provide areduction in insurance
premiums.
Conclusions:The vandal guard in the 428E cab is incorporated
into thedesign of the console. On the JCB, there is a separate
cover,rendering it an easier task for the vandal to remove. It
mustalso be completely removed by the operator and stowed in thecab
by the operators feet when not in use.
Both the 428E and the 3CX are available with MSS. However,the
system on the 428E can be operated without removing thekey: there
is a separate key fob to deactivate the system. On theJCB, the
deactivation chip is part if the key, meaning theoperator must
remove the key every time the machine needs tobe started. At best,
this is an annoyance. At worst, this will leadto premature failure
of the ignition switch.
Security
3CX 3CX
3CX
428E
428E
-
24 Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Serviceability
Advantage:All fluid levels and fill points are easy to access
underneath thehood on the 428E. All daily fluid servicing is on the
left hand sideof the machine, and all filters are mounted
vertically to avoidspills and contamination.
Conclusions:The fully opening hood on the 428E provides
excellent access tothe engine bay. All fluid check and fill points
are easily accessibleand colour coded, to help the operator
identify the correct system.
Some check and fill-points on the JCB are difficult to reach and
some require the engine side-panels to be removed. The transmission
oil check and fill point is through a smalldiameter tube (22 mm).
This makes it difficult and slow to fill thetransmission oil. The
screen wash reservoir of the JCB is alsodifficult to access and
fill without spillage. The engine side-panelof the 3CX must be
removed in order to service the air filter. Thisis not the case
with the 428E, which also includes an air filterservice indicator
as standard.
Daily Checks
428E
428E
3CX
3CX
3CX
-
25Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Serviceability
Advantage:The 428E has an accessible, clear engine bay and is
equippedwith a standard fine mesh fan guard.
Conclusions:The 428E operator can be assured that Caterpillar
have safety inmind. The engine bay on the JCB appears cluttered and
has anunguarded fan which poses a significant safety risk. The air
pre-cleaner on the JCB also blows dust into the engine bay,
whereasthe Caterpillar system has Automatic Dust Ejection and
channelsit out through the exhaust.
On the 428E, the fuel and water separator filters have
beencombined. This has lead to a 40% reduction in filter costs, as
thereis now only one filter to replace. On the JCB, there are two
filtersand the water separator does not drain directly onto the
floor,which can contribute to a dirty engine bay.
Engine Bay
428E
3CX
-
26 Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Serviceability
Advantage:The 428E has sealed bearings and grease free king pins
on thefront axle. The machine also has sealed for life
driveshaftbearings.
Conclusions:The front axle and driveshaft on the Caterpillar BHL
aremaintenance free. The cuts down on the time the operator needs
to spend on daily greasing.
The 3CX front axle requires regular greasing; at the main
pivotpin, the driveshaft, the axle universal joints and the axle
king pins.This means the operator must crawl under the machine
regularly,all year round, to perform this maintenance. A dirty job,
whereverthe machine is located.
Front Axle & Drive Shafts
428E
3CX
3CX
428E
-
27Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Serviceability
Advantage:The Caterpillar 428E utilises a cartridge-type
hydraulic filter.
Conclusions:Changing the hydraulic filter on the 428E is a
simple and cleanprocess.
By comparison, the filter on the JCB is immersed inside
thehydraulic tank. It is accessed through a panel in the top of
thetank, requiring the removal of 6 bolts. This open access
panelcarries a high risk of contamination of the hydraulic system
bymaterial falling in through the opening, during service.
Hydraulic Filter
3CX
428E
-
28 Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Serviceability
Advantage:The 428E hydraulic system uses Caterpillar XT3 hoses
and steeltubes, which are completely serviceable. All connections
use o-ring face seals.
Conclusions:The cylinders on the JCB use welded tubes. These are
difficult toreplace, should they become damaged. Some of the tubes
are invulnerable positions, such as on the the bucket cylinder.
Ifdamaged, the old tube must be cut off and a new tube welded onin
its place. Compare this to the 428E, where the tubes can beeasily
replaced, with minimal tools.
Cylinders
3CX
428E
3CX
-
29Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Serviceability
Advantage:The 428E stabiliser leg wearpads have positive
screwadjustment that takes the operator only minutes to
complete.
Conclusions:The adjustment system on the 428E used a standard
bolt andlocknut. Free play can be adjusted out in minutes,
providing astable machine for backhoe operations.
The JCB system uses screw in plastic pucks. These can workloose,
swell and seize up or strip on the thread if not adjustedregularly.
They are also adjusted using non-standard size tools.Mounted on the
outside of the leg, the adjusting pads canbecome damaged on site.
By contrast, the adjustment on the428E leg is on the opposite side
and therefore better protected.
Stabiliser Wearpads
428E
3CX
-
30 Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Performance
Backhoe PerformanceThe 3CX has 9% more bucket breakout force
when using thePower pin position, but 5% less breakout force when
using theSpeed pin position. The Power pin position also reduces
thebucket operating angle to around 160.
The 428E has 7.5% more stick breakout force than the 3CX.
The 3CX can dig a 610mm wide flat bottom trench (to
SAEstandards) 38mm deeper than the 428E.
Loader PerformanceThe 428E has 12% higher loader breakout force
than the 3CX.
The 428E has 7% higher loader lift capacity than the 3CX.
Performance Comparison
-
31Feature Comparison Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe
Loader
Caterpillar 428E JCB 3CX
GeneralNet Power Std:67kW, Opt 73kW NA:59.8, Turbo:64.5 kW
HydraulicsPump Type Axial piston Twin gear pumpMax Flow 125
l/min Main Pump: NA:73 l/min,
Turbo: 79 l/minSecond Pump: NA: 51 l/min,Turbo: 57 l/min
System Pressure 227 bar 227 bar
BackhoeBreakout (Bucket) 51.1kN 48.4 kN (Speed)
55.9 kN (Power)Breakout (Stick) 31.8kN (Ret) 29.5 kN (Ret)Max
Dig Depth (SAE 2ft) 4172mm (Ret) 4210 mm (Ret)
Loader (MP Bucket w/forks) (6-in-1 shovel)Breakout 54.3kN 47.6
kNMax Dump Height 2668mm 2720 mmHinge Pin Height 3340mm 3450 mmLift
Cap to Max Height 3142kg 2930 kgType Parallel Lift Parallel
Lift
Brief Specifications
-
Caterpillar 428E vs JCB 3CX Backhoe Loader
HEKB3334 (11/2005)
www.CAT.com 2005 Caterpillar
The information contained herein is intended for circulation
only to Caterpillar and dealer employees whose duties require
knowledge of suchreports and is intended exclusively for their
information and training. It may contain unverified analysis and
facts observed by various Caterpillaror dealer employees. However,
effort has been made to provide reliable results regarding any
information comparing Caterpillar built andcompetitive machines.
Effort has been made to use the latest available spec sheet and
other material in the full understanding that these aresubject to
change without notice. Any reproduction of this release without the
foregoing explanation is prohibited.
All rights reserved