Caterpillar Corporation Caterpillar, Inc was founded in 1925. Headquartered in Peoria, Illinois, the company manufactures construction and mining equipment, diesel and natural gas engines, and industrial gas turbines. The company operates in three primary lines of business: machinery, engines, and financial products. The machinery line of business designs, manufactures, markets, and sells construction, mining, and forestry machinery, such as track and wheel tractors, track and wheel loaders, pipelayers, motor graders, wheel tractor-scrapers, track and wheel excavators, backhoe loaders, log skidders, log loaders, offhighway trucks, articulated trucks, paving products, telescopic handlers, skid steer loaders, and related parts. It also offers logistics services for other companies. The engines business line designs, manufactures, markets, and sells engines for the company’s machinery; electric power generation systems; on-highway vehicles and locomotives; marine, petroleum, construction, industrial, agricultural, and other applications; and related parts. The financial products line of business includes provision of various financing alternatives to customers and dealers for the company’s machinery and engines, and solar gas turbines, as well as other equipment and marine vessels. It also offers various forms of insurance to customers and dealers to support the purchase and lease of Caterpillar’s equipment; and invests in independent power projects using the company’s power generation equipment and services. Caterpillar markets its products through various distribution centers and dealers worldwide. Your task is to evaluation the possibility of a divestiture of caterpillar’s finance division. You should base your analysis on the Summary Statistics and the excerpts from Caterpillar’s Financial Statements shown on the following pages. Please try to answer the following questions: • Show, with a diagram, your recommended method of divesting the division • What assets would go with the new company? • What liabilities? • Estimate the new division’s value.
19
Embed
caterpillar - NYUpages.stern.nyu.edu/~igiddy/cases/caterpillar.pdf · Caterpillar Corporation Caterpillar, Inc was founded in 1925. Headquartered in Peoria, Illinois, the company
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Caterpillar Corporation Caterpillar, Inc was founded in 1925. Headquartered in Peoria, Illinois, the company manufactures construction and mining equipment, diesel and natural gas engines, and industrial gas turbines. The company operates in three primary lines of business: machinery, engines, and financial products. The machinery line of business designs, manufactures, markets, and sells construction, mining, and forestry machinery, such as track and wheel tractors, track and wheel loaders, pipelayers, motor graders, wheel tractor-scrapers, track and wheel excavators, backhoe loaders, log skidders, log loaders, offhighway trucks, articulated trucks, paving products, telescopic handlers, skid steer loaders, and related parts. It also offers logistics services for other companies. The engines business line designs, manufactures, markets, and sells engines for the company’s machinery; electric power generation systems; on-highway vehicles and locomotives; marine, petroleum, construction, industrial, agricultural, and other applications; and related parts. The financial products line of business includes provision of various financing alternatives to customers and dealers for the company’s machinery and engines, and solar gas turbines, as well as other equipment and marine vessels. It also offers various forms of insurance to customers and dealers to support the purchase and lease of Caterpillar’s equipment; and invests in independent power projects using the company’s power generation equipment and services. Caterpillar markets its products through various distribution centers and dealers worldwide. Your task is to evaluation the possibility of a divestiture of caterpillar’s finance division. You should base your analysis on the Summary Statistics and the excerpts from Caterpillar’s Financial Statements shown on the following pages. Please try to answer the following questions:
• Show, with a diagram, your recommended method of divesting the division
• What assets would go with the new company?
• What liabilities?
• Estimate the new division’s value.
STATEMENT 1 Caterpillar Inc.Consolidated Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31(Dollars in millions except per share data)
A-5
2005 2004 2003________ _______ _______Sales and revenues:
All short-term investments, which consist primarily of highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less, are considered to be cash equivalents.
Non-cash activities:Trade receivables of $6,786 million and $7,534 million were exchanged for retained interests in securitized trade receivables in 2004 and 2003, respectively.See Notes 2 and 6 on pages A-12 and A-16, respectively, for further discussion.
In 2005, $116 million of 9.375% debentures due in 2021 and $117 million of 8.00% debentures due in 2023 were exchanged for $307 million of 5.300%debentures due in 2035 and $23 million of cash. The $23 million of cash is included in payments on debt.
STATEMENT 4Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow for the Years Ended December 31(Millions of dollars)
A-8
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
As of December 31, 2005, amounts and expiration dates ofU.S. foreign tax credits available to carry forward were:
As of December 31, 2005, amounts and expiration dates ofnet operating loss carryforwards in various non-U.S. taxing juris-dictions were:
(Millions of dollars)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010-2015 Unlimited Total_____________________________________________________$7 $3 $0 $5 $137 $569 $721A valuation allowance has been recorded at certain non-U.S. sub-
sidiaries that have not yet demonstrated consistent and/or sustain-able profitability to support the recognition of net deferred tax assets.
As of December 31, 2005, approximately $890 million of statetax net operating losses (NOLs) and $36 million of state tax creditcarryforwards were available. Of the NOLs, 67% expire after2015. The state tax credit carryforwards expire over the nextten years. We established a valuation allowance for those NOLsand credit carryforwards likely to expire prior to utilization.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff PositionNo. 109-1 “Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accountingfor Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified ProductionActivities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004”(FSP 109-1). FSP 109-1 provides accounting guidance for com-panies that will be eligible for a tax deduction resulting from “qual-ified production activities income” as defined in the American JobsCreation Act of 2004 (the Act). FSP 109-1 requires this deductionbe treated as a special deduction in accordance with SFAS 109,which does not require a revaluation of our U.S. deferred tax assets.We applied the guidance in FSP 109-1 upon recognition of this taxdeduction beginning January 1, 2005. The application of FSP 109-1did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff PositionNo. 109-2 “Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the ForeignEarnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs CreationAct of 2004” (FSP 109-2). FSP 109-2 provides accounting guidancefor the one-time tax deduction of 85% of non-U.S. earnings thatare repatriated in excess of a base amount as defined in the Act.SFAS 109 requires a company to reflect in the period of enactmentthe effect of a new tax law. Due to the lack of clarification of certainprovisions within the Act, FSP 109-2 allowed companies timebeyond the financial reporting period of enactment to evaluatethe effect of the Act. We completed our evaluation in the secondquarter and recognized a provision for income taxes of $33 millionin 2005 under the provisions of the Act. We repatriated earningsof $1.4 billion in 2005, which includes approximately $500 mil-lion subject to the preferential treatment allowed by the Act. Inconnection with our repatriation plan, we now intend to indefinitelyreinvest earnings of a few selected non-U.S. subsidiaries and havereversed the associated deferred tax liability of $38 million.
The 2005 provision for income taxes also includes the impactof favorable tax settlements of $26 million primarily related tonon-U.S. tax jurisdictions. The net impact of repatriation planningand these favorable tax settlements was a $31 million decrease toour 2005 provision for income taxes. Excluding these discreteitems, the effective tax rate for 2005 was 29.5%.
During the second quarter of 2005, the Internal Revenue Service(IRS) completed its field examination of our 1995 through 1999U.S. tax returns. In connection with this examination, we receivednotices of certain adjustments proposed by the IRS, primarilyrelated to foreign sales corporation (FSC) commissions, foreigntax credit calculations and R&D credits. We disagree with theseproposed adjustments and are vigorously disputing this matterthrough applicable IRS and judicial procedures, as appropriate.Although the final resolution of the proposed adjustments is uncer-tain, in the opinion of our management, the ultimate dispositionof these matters will not have a material adverse effect on ourconsolidated financial position, liquidity or results of operations.
6. Sales and servicing of trade receivables
Our Machinery and Engines operations generate trade receiv-ables from the sale of inventory to dealers and customers. Certainof these receivables are sold to Cat Financial.
A. Prior to June 2005, Cat Financial periodically securitized aportion of the dealer receivables using a revolving securitizationstructure. We used a trust which issued a collateralized trust obli-gation (CTO) certificate to third party purchasers for their portionof these receivables. The trust also issued a transferor certificate(certificated retained interests) to Cat Financial for the portion notrepresented by the CTO.
For 2003 and through August of 2004, the trust was a quali-fying special purpose entity (QSPE) and thus, in accordance withSFAS 140, was not consolidated. The outstanding principal bal-ance of the CTO was not included in our Consolidated FinancialPosition during these periods. As of December 31, 2003, the cer-tificated retained interests of $1,550 million were included in“Retained Interests in Securitized Trade Receivables” in Statement 2.
From September 2004 through May 2005, because of a signif-icant increase in Machinery and Engines’ sales and subsequentsale of the receivables to Cat Financial, our certificated retainedinterests in the trust exceeded 90% of the fair value of trust assets.Thus, during this period, the trust did not qualify as a QSPE asdefined by SFAS 140. We therefore consolidated the trust inaccordance with FIN 46R, “Consolidation of Variable InterestEntities” (revised) as it represents a variable interest entity for whichCat Financial is the primary beneficiary. As of December 31, 2004,assets of the trust of $2,587 million were included in “Receivables— trade and other” in Statement 2 and the CTO of $240 mil-lion was included in “Short-term Borrowings.” Please refer toNote 15.
Cat Financial serviced the dealer receivables and received anannual servicing fee of approximately 1% of the average out-standing principal balance of the securitized trade receivablestransferred to third party purchasers. Consolidated expenses of$7 million and $6 million related to the securitized receivableswere recognized during 2004 and 2003, respectively, and areincluded in “Other income (expense)” on Statement 1. Expectedcredit losses were assumed to be 0% because dealer receivableshave historically had no losses and none were expected. Thecarrying value of the certificated retained interests approximatedfair value due to their short-term nature. Other than the certifi-cated retained interests (assets of the trust when consolidated),the investors and the securitization facilities had no recourse toCat Financial’s assets for failure of debtors to pay when due.
NOTES continued
A-16
Caterpillar Inc.
A-17
(Millions of dollars) 2004 2003______ ______Cash flow from securitizations:Proceeds from collections reinvested
(1) For 2004, proceeds, servicing fees received and average balances include only the periods thetrust was a QSPE.
In June 2005, Cat Financial terminated the trade receivablesecuritization trust and no longer securitizes trade receivables.Upon termination, receivables held by the trust were transferredback to Cat Financial.B. In June 2005, Cat Financial transferred an undivided interestof $240 million in trade receivables to third party purchasers. Inaccordance with SFAS 140, the transfer to third party purchasersis accounted for as a sale. Cat Financial services the transferredtrade receivables and receives an annual servicing fee of approxi-mately 1% of the average outstanding principal balance. Consoli-dated expense of $8 million related to the sale of trade receivableswas recognized during 2005 and is included in “Other income(expense)” on Statement 1.
The remaining interest as of December 31, 2005 of $3,028 mil-lion is included in “Receivables — trade and other” in Statement 2.The cash collections from these receivables held by Cat Financial,including those attributable to the third party purchasers, are firstapplied to satisfy any obligations of Cat Financial to those pur-chasers. The third party purchasers have no recourse to CatFinancial’s assets, other than the remaining interest, for failureof debtors to pay when due. For Cat Financial’s remaining inter-est in trade receivables, carrying amount approximated fair valuedue to the short-term nature of these receivables.
7. Wholesale inventory receivablesWholesale inventory receivables are receivables of Cat Financialthat arise when Cat Financial provides financing for a dealer’s pur-chase of inventory. These receivables are included in “Receivables— trade and other” and “Long-term receivables — trade and other”in Statement 2 and were $1,282 million, $991 million and $764 mil-lion at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Please referto Note 20 on page A-28 and Table III on page A-29 for fair valueinformation.Contractual maturities of outstanding wholesale inventory receivables:
Finance receivables are receivables of Cat Financial, which gen-erally can be repaid or refinanced without penalty prior to contrac-tual maturity. Total finance receivables reported in Statement 2are net of an allowance for credit losses.
During 2005, 2004 and 2003, Cat Financial securitized retailinstallment sale contracts and finance leases into public asset-backed securitization facilities. The securitization facilities arequalifying special purpose entities and thus, in accordance withSFAS 140, are not consolidated. These finance receivables, whichare being held in securitization trusts, are secured by new andused equipment. Cat Financial retained servicing responsibilitiesand subordinated interests related to these securitizations. For2005, subordinated interests included subordinated certificateswith an initial fair value of $8 million, an interest in certain futurecash flow (excess) with an initial fair value of $1 million and areserve account with an initial fair value of $12 million. For2004, subordinated interests included subordinated certificateswith an initial fair value of $8 million, an interest in certain futurecash flow (excess) with an initial fair value of $2 million and areserve account with an initial fair value of $10 million. For2003, subordinated interests included subordinated certificateswith an initial fair value of $9 million, an interest in certain futurecash flow (excess) with an initial fair value of $14 million anda reserve account with an initial fair value of $10 million. Thecompany’s retained interests generally are subordinate to theinvestors’ interests. Net gains of $12 million, $13 million and$22 million were recognized on these transactions in 2005, 2004and 2003, respectively.
Significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of theretained interests and subordinated certificates at the time of thetransaction were:
These assumptions are based on our historical experience,market trends and anticipated performance relative to the par-ticular assets securitized.
The company receives annual servicing fees of approximately1% of the unpaid note value.
As of December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, the subordinatedretained interests in the public securitizations totaled $72 million,$73 million and $73 million, respectively. Key assumptions usedto determine the fair value of the retained interests were:
The investors and the securitization trusts have no recourse toCat Financial’s other assets for failure of debtors to pay when due.
We estimated the impact of individual 10% and 20% changesto the key economic assumptions used to determine the fair valueof residual cash flow in retained interests on our income. An
NOTES continued
A-18
independent, adverse change to each key assumption had animmaterial impact on the fair value of residual cash flow.
We consider an account past due if any portion of an installmentis due and unpaid for more than 30 days. Recognition of income issuspended when management determines that collection of futureincome is not probable (generally after 120 days past due). Accrualis resumed, and previously suspended income is recognized, whenthe receivable becomes contractually current and/or collectiondoubts are removed. Cash receipts on impaired loans or financeleases are recorded against the receivable and then to any unrec-ognized income. Investment in loans/finance leases on non-accrual status were $175 million, $176 million and $233 millionand past due over 90 days and still accruing were $31 million,$11 million and $25 million as of December 31, 2005, 2004 and2003, respectively.
Cat Financial provides financing only when acceptable crite-ria are met. Credit decisions are based on, among other things,the customer’s credit history, financial strength and intended use
of equipment. Cat Financial typically maintains a security inter-est in retail financed equipment and requires physical damageinsurance coverage on financed equipment.
Please refer to Table I above for additional finance receiv-ables information and Note 20 on page A-28 and Table III onpage A-29 for fair value information.
We had long-term material purchase obligations of approxi-mately $890 million at December 31, 2005.
TABLE I — Finance Receivables Information (Millions of dollars)_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Total Financial Products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,960 12,174 10,943______ ______ ______Total long-term debt due after one year . . . . . . . $15,677 $ 15,837 $14,546______ ______ ____________ ______ ______
All outstanding notes and debentures are unsecured. The cap-ital lease obligations which were collateralized by leased man-ufacturing equipment and/or security deposits, were terminatedin the fourth quarter of 2005. This resulted in the fulfillment ofthe capital lease obligation and conversion of the associated secu-rity deposits into cash. The deposit obligations have correspond-ing security deposits, which are included in “Other assets” inStatement 2. These deposit obligations and corresponding secu-rity deposits relate to two finance arrangements which provideus a return. These finance arrangements require that we committo certain long-term obligations and provide security depositswhich will fulfill these obligations when they become due.
On September 13, 2005, $116 million of 9.375% debenturesdue in 2021 and $117 million of 8.00% debentures due in 2023were exchanged for $307 million of 5.30% debentures due in2035 and $23 million of cash. The book value of the 5.30%debentures due in 2035 was $200 million at December 31, 2005,which results in an effective yield of 8.55%.
We may redeem the 6.55% notes and the 5.30%, 7.25%,6.625%, 7.3%, 6.95% and 7.375% debentures in whole or in partat our option at any time at a redemption price equal to the greaterof 100% of the principal amount of the debentures to be redeemedor the sum of the present value of the remaining scheduled payments.
The terms of other notes and debentures do not specify aredemption option prior to maturity.
Based on long-term credit agreements, $299 million, $1,440 mil-lion and $1,870 million of commercial paper outstanding atDecember 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, was classifiedas long-term debt due after one year.
Medium-term notes are offered by prospectus and are issuedthrough agents at fixed and floating rates. Financial Productsmedium-term notes have a weighted average interest rate of 4.1%with remaining maturities up to 20 years at December 31, 2005.
The aggregate amounts of maturities of long-term debt duringeach of the years 2006 through 2010, including amounts duewithin one year and classified as current, are:
supporting commercial paper . . . 4,563 328 4,235Less: Utilized credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 531 143 388_____ _____ _____Available credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,833 $1,040 $1,793_____ _____ __________ _____ _____(1) We have three global credit facilities with a syndicate of banks totaling $5,750 million available
in the aggregate to both Machinery and Engines and Financial Products to support commercialpaper programs. Based on management’s allocation decision, which can be revised at any timeduring the year, the portion of the facility available to Cat Financial at December 31, 2005 was$5,150 million. The five-year facility of $2,500 million expires in September 2009. The five-yearfacility of $1,625 million expires in September 2010. The 364-day facility of $1,625 millionexpires in September 2006. The facility expiring in September 2006 has a provision that allowsCaterpillar or Cat Financial to obtain a one-year loan in September 2006 that would mature inSeptember 2007.As part of Cat Financial’s 2005 global credit facilities renewal,
the year-end leverage covenant (debt-to-equity ratio) has beenincreased to 8.5:1, from previous level of 8:1 which aligns it withthe 8.5:1 six-month moving average leverage covenant. AtDecember 31, 2005, there were no borrowings under these linesand Cat Financial was in compliance with all debt covenants.
18. Capital stock
A. Stock optionsIn 1996, stockholders approved the Stock Option and Long-TermIncentive Plan (the Plan) providing for the granting of options topurchase common stock to officers and other key employees, aswell as non-employee directors. The Plan reserves 144 millionshares of common stock for issuance (128 million under the Planand 16 million under prior stock option plans). Options grantedprior to 2004 vest at the rate of one-third per year over the threeyear period following the date of grant. In anticipation of delayingvesting until three years after the grant date for future grants, the2004 grant vested on December 31, 2004. In order to better alignour employee stock option program with the overall market, thenumber of options granted in 2005 (issued in February) wassignificantly reduced from the previous year. In response to thisdecrease, we elected to immediately vest the 2005 option grant.All grants continue to have a maximum term of 10 years. Common
NOTES continued
A-26
Caterpillar Inc.
A-29
guarantees generally have one-year terms and are secured, pri-marily by dealer assets.
We provide loan guarantees to a third party lender for financ-ing associated with machinery purchased by customers. The loanguarantees are for the remote chance that the customers willbecome insolvent. These guarantees have an average three-yearterm and are secured by the machinery.
Cat Financial has provided a limited indemnity to a third partybank for $40 million resulting from the assignment of certainleases to that bank. The indemnity is for the remote chance thatthe insurers of these leases would become insolvent. The indem-nity expires December 15, 2012 and is unsecured.
No loss has been experienced or is anticipated under any ofthese guarantees. At December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, therelated book value was $9 million, $10 million and $5 million,respectively. The maximum potential amount of future payments(undiscounted and without reduction for any amounts that maypossibly be recovered under recourse or collateralized provi-sions) we could be required to make under the guarantees atDecember 31 are as follows:(Millions of dollars) 2005 2004 2003______ _____ _____Guarantees with Caterpillar Dealers . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 434 $ 364 $ 380Guarantees with Customers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 29 —Limited Indemnity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 45 —Guarantees — other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 17 37______ _____ _____Total guarantees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 554 $ 455 $ 417______ _____ ___________ _____ _____
We are party to agreements in the normal course of businesswith selected customers and Caterpillar dealers in which we com-mit to provide a set dollar amount of financing on a pre-approved
basis. We also provide lines of credit to selected customers andCaterpillar dealers, of which a portion remains unused as of theend of the period. Commitments and lines of credit generally havefixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. It has beenour experience that not all commitments and lines of credit willbe used. Management applies the same credit policies when mak-ing commitments and granting lines of credit as it does for anyother financing. We do not require collateral for these commit-ments/lines, but if credit is extended, collateral may be requiredupon funding. The amount of the unused commitments and linesof credit for dealers as of December 31, 2005 was $4,729 millioncompared to $5,019 million at December 31, 2004 and $4,784 mil-lion at December 31, 2003. The amount of the unused commit-ments and lines of credit for customers as of December 31, 2005was $1,972 million compared to $1,499 million at December 31,2004 and $1,336 million at December 31, 2003.
Our product warranty liability is determined by applying his-torical claim rate experience to the current field population anddealer inventory. Historical claim rates are developed using a rollingaverage of actual warranty payments. Effective in the third quar-ter of 2004, we refined our process to utilize more detailed claimrates by product. This provides more comprehensive productwarranty information for management. This change did not havea material impact on our financial statements.
TABLE III — Fair Values of Financial Instruments_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(Millions of dollars) Amount Value Amount Value Amount Value Reference________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ _______Asset (Liability) at December 31
Guarantees(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (9) (10) (10) (10) (5) (9) Note 23(1) Total excluded items have a net carrying value at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 of $1,719 million, $1,737 million and $1,546 million, respectively.(2) The carrying amount provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 45 related to guarantees are effective for guarantees issued or modified subsequent to December 31, 2002 only, whereas the fair value amount
is for all guarantees.
Caterpillar Inc.
A-33
TABLE IV — Segment Information (Millions of dollars)_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Business Segments:Machinery and Engines____________________________________________________________________________________________
Asia/ Construction Large North Power Financing Consoli-Pacific & Mining EAME Electric Power Latin America Systems All & Insurance dated
TABLE IV Continued — Segment Information (Millions of dollars)_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
TABLE IV Continued — Segment Information (Millions of dollars)_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Information about Geographic Areas:External Sales & Revenues(1) Net property, plant and equipment___________________________ ___________________________
(1) In 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” and therefore no longer amortize goodwill.(2) Computed on weighted-average number of shares outstanding.(3) Computed on weighted-average number of shares outstanding diluted by assumed exercise of stock options, using the treasury stock method.(4) Represents profit divided by average stockholders’ equity (beginning of year stockholders’ equity plus end of year stockholders’ equity divided by two).(5) The per share data reflects the 2005 2-for-1 stock split, applied retroactively, to all periods presented.
Five-year Financial Summary Caterpillar Inc.(Dollars in millions except per share data)
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
A-42
Machinery operating profit of $2.431 billion was up $675 mil-lion, or 38 percent, from 2004. The favorable impact of improvedprice realization and higher sales volume was partially offset byhigher core operating costs and higher retirement benefits.Engines operating profit of $1.071 billion was up $482 million,or 82 percent, from 2004. The favorable impact of improvedprice realization and higher sales volume was partially offset byhigher core operating costs and higher retirement benefits.Financial Products operating profit of $531 million was up$61 million, or 13 percent, from 2004. The increase was primarilydue to $123 million favorable impact from the continued growthof earning assets at Cat Financial. Partially offsetting this increasewere $33 million in higher operating expenses, primarily relatedto growth at Cat Financial and a $28 million decrease in operatingprofit at Cat Insurance, primarily due to less favorable insurancereserve adjustments in 2005 than in 2004.
OTHER PROFIT/LOSS ITEMSOther income/expense was income of $377 million comparedwith income of $253 million in 2004. The improvement was dueto the favorable impact of currency, higher interest income andthe absence of a number of expense items incurred during 2004that were individually not significant.The provision for income taxes in 2005 reflects an annual taxrate of 29.5 percent, excluding the discrete items discussed below,and compares to a 27 percent rate in 2004. The increase is primar-ily due to a reduction in our Extraterritorial Income Exclusion(ETI) benefits, partially attributable to the impact of the AmericanJobs Creation Act (AJCA) permitting only 80 percent of ETI bene-fits in 2005 and to a change in our geographic mix of profits.
During 2005, we repatriated earnings of $1.4 billion, whichincludes approximately $500 million subject to preferential taxtreatment allowed by the AJCA. We recognized a charge of$33 million related to this repatriation. In connection with ourcurrent repatriation plan, we changed our intention of repatriatingearnings for a few selected non-U.S. subsidiaries and recognizedan income tax benefit of $38 million. In addition, we recognizedan income tax benefit of $26 million from the settlement of several
non-U.S. tax issues. The net impact of these items is a $31 milliondiscrete benefit to our 2005 provision for income taxes.
Supplemental Information(Millions of dollars) 2005 2004 2003Identifiable Assets:
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,477 $ 1,397 $ 1,347_______ _______ ______________ _______ _______Caterpillar operations are highly integrated; therefore, the company uses a number of alloca-tions to determine lines of business financial data.
UAW LABOR AGREEMENTIn January 2005 the company and about 9,000 employees rep-resented by the United Auto Workers reached a new six-year laboragreement that will expire on March 1, 2011. This agreementpositions the company and all our employees for long-term com-petitiveness. While the initial impact was about a $100 millionincrease in retirement benefits in 2005, with the establishment ofa very competitive market-based new hire wage package, theintroduction of employee and retiree health care cost-sharing andother operational effectiveness improvements, we believe wehave a long-term cost structure that enables us to compete fromour traditional manufacturing and logistics locations.
Sales and Revenues by Geographic Region
% North % % Latin % Asia/ %(Millions of dollars) Total Change America Change EAME Change America Change Pacific Change
$ 8,584 $ 4,360 $ 2,322 $ 757 $ 1,145_______ _______ _______ _______ ______________ _______ _______ _______ _______(1) Does not include internal engine transfers of $458 million and $420 million in 2005 and 2004, respectively. Internal engines transfers are valued at prices comparable to those for unrelated parties.(2) Does not include revenues earned from Machinery and Engines of $93 million and $57 million in 2005 and 2004, respectively.
FOURTH QUARTER 2005 COMPARED WITH FOURTH QUARTER 2004
Caterpillar Inc.
A-59
Supplemental Data for Financial PositionAt December 31(Millions of dollars)
(1) Represents Caterpillar Inc. and its subsidiaries with Financial Products accounted for on the equity basis.(2) Elimination of receivables between Machinery and Engines and Financial Products.(3) Reclassification of Machinery and Engines trade receivables purchased by Cat Financial and Cat Financial’s wholesale inventory receivables.(4) Elimination of Machinery and Engines insurance premiums that are prepaid to Financial Products.(5) Elimination of Machinery and Engines investment in Financial Products subsidiary.(6) Elimination of Financial Products equity which is accounted for on Machinery and Engines on the equity basis.(7) Reclassification reflecting required netting of deferred tax assets/liabilities by taxing jurisdiction.(8) Elimination of debt between Machinery and Engines and Financial Products.(9) Elimination of payables between Machinery and Engines and Financial Products.
(10) Elimination of prepaid insurance in Financial Products’ accrued expenses.
A-60
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
Supplemental Data for Statement of Cash FlowFor The Years Ended December 31(Millions of dollars)
(1) Represents Caterpillar Inc. and its subsidiaries with Financial Products accounted for on the equity basis.(2) Elimination of Financial Products profit after tax due to equity method of accounting.(3) Non-cash adjustment for the undistributed earnings from Financial Products.(4) Elimination of non-cash adjustments and changes in assets and liabilities related to consolidated reporting. 2004 receivables amounts include adjustment for consolidated non-cash receipt of
retained interests in securitized trade receivables. See Notes 2 and 6 on pages A-12 and A-16, respectively, for further discussion.(5) Reclassification of Cat Financial’s cash flow activity from investing to operating for receivables that arose from the sale of inventory.(6) Elimination of Cat Financial’s additions to retained interests in securitized trade receivables that arose from an intercompany purchase of receivables.(7) Net proceeds and payments to/from Machinery and Engines and Financial Products.(8) Change in investment and common stock related to Financial Products.(9) Elimination of dividend from Financial Products to Machinery and Engines.
(10) Elimination of the effect of exchange on intercompany balances.
Diversified IndustrialsPage 18 of 32
1340
Name
Price Date: 01-Jan-2007 Last Update Date: 02-Jan-2007
- Under applicable law and/or JPMorgan Chase Co policy, all recommendations and estimates for companies marked with a '***' in the Status column have been removed
BankingPage 80 of 85
1340
Name
Price Date: 01-Jan-2007 Last Update Date: 02-Jan-2007
- Under applicable law and/or JPMorgan Chase Co policy, all recommendations and estimates for companies marked with a '***' in the Status column have been removed