Catastrophes, Cyclicality and the Economy Property/Casualty Insurance at the Crossroads Insurance Information Institute January 20, 2012 Robert P. Hartwig, Ph.D., CPCU, President & Economist Insurance Information Institute 110 William Street New York, NY 10038 Tel: 212.346.5520 Cell: 917.453.1885 [email protected]
105
Embed
Catastrophes, Cyclicality and the Economy Property/Casualty Insurance at the Crossroads Insurance Information Institute January 20, 2012 Robert P. Hartwig,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Catastrophes, Cyclicality and the Economy
Property/Casualty Insurance at the Crossroads
Insurance Information InstituteJanuary 20, 2012
Robert P. Hartwig, Ph.D., CPCU, President & EconomistInsurance Information Institute 110 William Street New York, NY 10038
What Are the Implications for Insurance and Risk Management?
4
We Are Living in an Age of Elevated Global Economic UncertaintyECONOMIC & POLITICAL CONCERNS European Sovereign Debt, Bank & Currency Crises Global Economic Slowdown Echoes of the Financial Crisis & Financial Market Volatility Collapse of Major Financial Institutions U.S. Debt and Budget Crisis, S&P Downgrade & Tax Uncertainty Housing Crisis Persistently High Unemployment Inflation/Deflation Energy & Commodity Prices Volatility Political Upheaval in the Middle East (Arab Spring, Iran) Regulation & Regulatory Uncertainty New World Order: China’s Economic and Military Ascendency 2012 US Elections & Political BrinksmanshipCATASTROPHIC LOSS Japan, New Zealand, Chile, Haiti Earthquakes Nuclear Fears (Japan, Germany, US) Floods (Thailand, US) U.S.: Tornadoes, Flooding, Wildfires, Hurricanes, Winter Storms Manmade Disasters (e.g., Deepwater Horizon) Cyber Attacks Resurgent Terrorism Risk (Bin Laden, Gadhafi, Kim Jong Il deaths)
Are “Black Swans”
everywhere or does it just seem that way?
8
P/C Insurance Industry Financial Overview
Profit Recovery Was Set Back in 2011 by High Catastrophe
Loss & Other Factors
P/C Net Income After Taxes1991–2011:Q3 ($ Millions)
P-C Industry 2011:Q3 profits were down 71% to $8.0B vs. 2010:Q3,
due primarily to high catastrophe losses and as non-cat
underwriting results deteriorated
* ROE figures are GAAP; 1Return on avg. surplus. Excluding Mortgage & Financial Guaranty insurers yields a 3.0% ROAS for 2011:Q3, 7.5% for 2010 and 7.4% for 2009.Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute
A 100 Combined Ratio Isn’t What ItOnce Was: Investment Impact on ROEs
Combined Ratio / ROE
* 2008 -2011 figures are return on average surplus and exclude mortgage and financial guaranty insurers. 2011:Q3 combined ratio including M&FG insurers is 109.9, ROAS = 1.9%. Source: Insurance Information Institute from A.M. Best and ISO data.
Combined Ratios Must Be Lower in Today’s DepressedInvestment Environment to Generate Risk Appropriate ROEs
A combined ratio of about 100 generated ~5.5% ROE in 2009/10,
10% in 2005 and 16% in 1979
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
*
Profitability Peaks & Troughs in the P/C Insurance Industry, 1975 – 2011*
*Profitability = P/C insurer ROEs are I.I.I. estimates. 2011 figure is an estimate based on annualized ROAS through Q3 data. Note: Data for 2008-2011 exclude mortgage and financial guaranty insurers. For 2011:Q3 ROAS = 1.9% including M&FG.Source: Insurance Information Institute; NAIC, ISO, A.M. Best.
1977:19.0% 1987:17.3%
1997:11.6%2006:12.7%
1984: 1.8% 1992: 4.5% 2001: -1.2%
10 Years
10 Years9 Years
2011:3.0%*
History suggests next ROE peak will be in 2016-2017
ROE
1975: 2.4%
13
ROE vs. Equity Cost of Capital:U.S. P/C Insurance:1991-2011*
* Return on average surplus used as proxy for ROE in 2008-2011 and excluding mortgage and financial guaranty insurers for these years. Change in model methodology in 2011 increased cost of capital by approximately 90 basis points.Source: The Geneva Association, Insurance Information Institute
Natural Catastrophes Worldwide 2011Insured losses US$ 105bn - Percentage distribution per continent
Continent Insured losses US$ m
America (North and South
America)40,000
Europe 2,000
Africa Minor damages
Asia 45,000
Australia/Oceania 18,000
37%
2%
44%
17%
<1%
20Source: MR NatCatSERVICE
In 2011, 61% of insured natural catastrophe losses
were in the Asia/Pacific region, nearly 3.5 times the
average of 13% over the prior 30 years (1981-2010)
In 2011, just 37% of insured natural
catastrophe losses were in the
Americas, barely half the average of 66%
over the prior 30 years (1981-2010)
Natural Catastrophes Worldwide 1980 – 2011 Insured losses US$ 870bn - Percentage distribution per continent
Continent Insured losses US$ m
America (North and South
America)566,000
Europe 146,000
Africa 2,000
Asia 115,000
Australia/Oceania 41,000
66%
16%
<1%
13%
5%
21Source: MR NatCatSERVICE
In 2011, 61% of natural catastrophe losses were
in the Asia/Pacific region, nearly 3.5 times the
average of 13% over the prior 30 years (1981-2010)
23
Top 16 Most Costly World Insurance Losses, 1970-2011**
(Insured Losses, 2011 Dollars, $ Billions)
*Average of range estimates of $35B - $40B as of 1/4/12; Privately insured losses only.**Figures do not include federally insured flood losses.Sources: Swiss Re sigma 1/2011; Munich Re; Insurance Information Institute research.
$10.0$11.9 $13.0$13.1
$19.1$21.3
$24.0$25.0
$37.5
$47.6
$7.7 $8.1 $8.3 $8.5 $9.3 $9.7
$0$5
$10$15$20$25$30$35$40$45$50
Hugo (1989)
WinterStormDaria(1991)
ChileQuake(2010)
Ivan (2004)
TyphoonMirielle(1991)
Charley(2004)
ThailandFloods(2011)
Wilma(2005)
NewZealandQuake(2011)
Ike (2008)
Northridge(1994)
SpringTornadoes/
Storms(2011)
WTC TerrorAttack(2001)
Andrew(1992)
JapanQuake,
Tsunami(2011)*
Katrina(2005)
Taken as a single event, the Spring 2011 tornado and
thunderstorm season would likely become the 5th
costliest event in global insurance history
5 of the top 14 most expensive
catastrophes in world history have occurred within the past 2 years
2011 Was One of the Most Expensive Years on Record
27
Top 14 Most Costly Disastersin U.S. History
(Insured Losses, 2011 Dollars, $ Billions)
*Losses will actually be broken down into several “events” as determined by PCS. Includes losses for the period April 1 – June 30.Sources: PCS; Insurance Information Institute inflation adjustments.
$9.0$11.9 $13.1
$19.1$21.3
$24.0 $25.0
$47.6
$8.5$7.7$6.5$5.5$4.4$4.3
$0$5
$10$15$20$25$30$35$40$45$50
Irene(2011)
Jeanne(2004)
Frances(2004)
Rita (2005)
Hugo (1989)
Ivan (2004)
Charley(2004)
Wilma(2005)
Ike (2008)
Northridge(1994)
SpringTornadoes& Storms*
(2011)
9/11Attack(2001)
Andrew(1992)
Katrina(2005)
Taken as a single event, the Spring 2011 tornado and storm season are
is the 4th costliest event in US insurance history
*PCS estimate through Sept. 30, 2011.Note: 2001 figure includes $20.3B for 9/11 losses reported through 12/31/01 ($25.9B 2011 dollars). Includes only business and personal property claims, business interruption and auto claims. Non-prop/BI losses = $12.2B ($15.6B in 2011 dollars.) Sources: Property Claims Service/ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
US CAT Losses in 2011 Were the 5th Highest in US History on An Inflation Adjusted Basis
$100 Billion CAT Year is Coming Eventually
Record Tornado Losses Caused
2011 CAT Losses to Surge
($ Billions, 2011 Dollars)
Natural Disaster Losses in the United States: 2011
**Includes $700 million in flood losses insured through the National Flood Insurance Program.Source: PCS except as noted by “*” which are sourced to Munich Re; Insurance Information Institute.
2011’s Most Expensive Catastrophes, Insured Losses
Includes $1.65B in AL, mostly in the Tuscaloosa
and Birmingham
areas
Includes approximately $2B in losses
for May 22 Joplin tornado
34
Combined Ratio Points Associated with Catastrophe Losses: 1960 – 2011*
*Insurance Information Institute estimates for 2010 and 2011 based on A.M. Best data.Notes: Private carrier losses only. Excludes loss adjustment expenses and reinsurance reinstatement premiums. Figures are adjusted for losses ultimately paid by foreign insurers and reinsurers.Source: ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
0.4
1.2
0.4 0.
8 1.3
0.3 0.4 0.
71.
51.
00.
40.
4 0.7
1.8
1.1
0.6
1.4 2.
01.
3 2.0
0.5
0.5 0.7
3.0
1.2
2.1
8.8
2.3
5.9
3.3
2.8
1.0
3.6
2.9
1.6
5.4
1.6
3.3
3.3
8.1
2.7
1.6
5.0
2.6
4.4
9.0
3.6
0.9
0.1
1.1
1.1
0.8
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
The Catastrophe Loss Component of Private Insurer Losses Has Increased Sharply in Recent Decades
unusual with tornado and thunderstorm accounting for the
vast majority of loss
Thunderstorm/ Tornado losses were 2.5 times above the 30-year average
40
Inflation Adjusted U.S. Catastrophe Losses by Cause of Loss, 1990–2011:H11
0.2%
2.4%
3.4%4.9%
6.6%
8.0%
31.8%
42.7%
1.Catastrophes are defined as events causing direct insured losses to property of $25 million or more in 2009 dollars.2.Excludes snow.3.Does not include NFIP flood losses4.Includes wildland fires5.Includes civil disorders, water damage, utility disruptions and non-property losses such as those covered by workers compensation.Source: ISO’s Property Claim Services Unit.
Hurricanes & Tropical Storms, $160.5
Fires (4), $9.0
Tornadoes (2), $119.5
Winter Storms, $30.0
Terrorism, $24.9
Geological Events, $18.5
Wind/Hail/Flood (3), $12.7
Other (5), $0.6
Wind losses are by far cause the most catastrophe losses,
even if hurricanes/TS are excluded.
Tornado share of CAT losses is
rising
41
2011: Nowhere to Run, Nowhere to Hide
Most of the Country East of the Rockies Suffered Severe Weather in 2011, Impacting
Most Insurers
Number of Federal Disaster Declarations, 1953-2011*
13 1
7 18
16
16
7 71
21
22
22
0 25
25
11
11
19
29
17
17
48
46
46
38
30
22 25
42
23
15
24
21
34
27 28
23
11
31
38
45
32 3
63
27
54
46
55
04
54
5 49
56
69
48 5
26
37
55
98
19
9
43
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
*
*Through December 31, 2011.Source: Federal Emergency Management Administration: http://www.fema.gov/news/disaster_totals_annual.fema ; Insurance Information Institute.
The Number of Federal Disaster Declarations Is Rising and Set a New Record in 2011
The number of federal disaster declarations set a
new record in 2011, with 99, shattering 2010’s record 81
Are Catastrophes and Other Factors Pressuring Insurance Markets?
55
Criteria Necessary for a “Market Turn”:All Four Criteria Must Be Met
Criteria Status Comments
Sustained Period of
Large Underwriting
LossesEarly Stage,
Inevitable
•Apart from 2011 CAT losses, overall p/c underwriting losses remain modest•Combined ratios (ex-CATs) still in low 100s (vs. 110+ at onset of last hard market)•Prior-year reserve releases continue to reduce u/w losses, boost ROEs, though more modestly
Material Decline in Surplus/ Capacity
Entered 2011 At Record
High; Since Fallen
•Surplus hit a record $565B as of 3/31/11•Fell by 4.6% through 9/30/11 (latest available)•Little excess capacity remains in reinsurance markets•Weak growth in demand for insurance is insufficient to absorb much excess capacity
Tight Reinsurance
MarketSomewhat in
Place
•Much of the global “excess capacity” was eroded by cats•Higher prices in Asia/Pacific•Modestly higher pricing for US risks
Renewed Underwriting
& Pricing Discipline
Some Firming esp. in
Property, WC
•Commercial lines pricing trends have turned from negative to flat or up in some lines (property, WC); Casualty is flat.•Competition remains intense as many seek to maintain market share
Sources: Barclays Capital; Insurance Information Institute.
1. UNDERWRITING
57
Have Underwriting Losses Been Large Enough for Long Enough to Turn the Market?
58
P/C Insurance Industry Combined Ratio, 2001–2011:Q3*
* 2009 combined ratio excl. mort. and finl. guar.anty insurers was 99.3, which would bring the 2000s total to 4 years with an u/w profit.**Data for the 2010s includes 2010 and 2011.Note: Data for 1920–1934 based on stock companies only.Sources: Insurance Information Institute research from A.M. Best Data.
Number of Years with Underwriting Profits
Underwriting Profits Were Common Before the 1980s (40 of the 60 Years Before 1980 Had Combined Ratios Below 100) –
But Then They Vanished. Not a Single Underwriting Profit Was Recorded in the 25 Years from 1979 Through 2003
61
2.3
-2.1
-8.3
-2.6-6.6
-9.9 -9.8
-4.1
1
11.7
23.2
13.79.9
7.3
-6.7-9.5
-14.6-16 -15
-5
-$20
-$15
-$10
-$5
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$309
2
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
E
11
E
Pri
or
Yr.
Re
se
rve
Re
lea
se
($
B)
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8 Imp
ac
t on
Co
mb
ine
d R
atio
(Po
ints
)
Prior Yr. ReserveDevelopment ($B)
Impact onCombined Ratio(Points)
P/C Reserve Development, 1992–2011E
Reserve Releases Are Remained Strong in 2010 But Should Begin to Taper Off in 2011
Note: 2005 reserve development excludes a $6 billion loss portfolio transfer between American Re and Munich Re. Including this transaction, total prior year adverse development in 2005 was $7 billion. The data from 2000 and subsequent years excludes development from financial guaranty and mortgage insurance. Sources: Barclay’s Capital; A.M. Best.
Prior year reserve releases totaled $8.8
billion in the first half of 2010, up from
$7.1 billion in the first half of 2009
Financial Strength & Underwriting
62
Cyclical Pattern is P-C Impairment History is Directly Tied to
Underwriting, Reserving & Pricing
P/C Insurer Impairments, 1969–20108
15
12
71
19
34
91
31
21
99
16
14
13
36
49
31 3
45
04
85
56
05
84
12
91
61
23
11
8 19
49 50
47
35
18
14 15 16 18
11
5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
Source: A.M. Best Special Report “1969-2010 Impairment Review,” June 21, 2011; Insurance Information Institute.
The Number of Impairments Varies Significantly Over the P/C Insurance Cycle, With Peaks Occurring Well into Hard Markets
3 small insurers in Missouri did encounter
problems in 2011 following the May
tornado in Joplin. They were absorbed by a
larger insurer and all claims were paid.
64
P/C Insurer Impairment Frequency vs. Combined Ratio, 1969-2010
90
95
100
105
110
115
1206
97
07
17
27
37
47
57
67
77
87
98
08
18
28
38
48
58
68
78
88
99
09
19
29
39
49
59
69
79
89
90
00
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
91
0
Co
mb
ine
d R
ati
o
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
Imp
airm
en
t Ra
te
Combined Ratio after Div P/C Impairment Frequency
Source: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute
2010 impairment rate was 0.35%, down from 0.65% in 2009 and near the record low of 0.17% in 2007; Rate is still less
than one-half the 0.81% average since 1969
Impairment Rates Are Highly Correlated With Underwriting Performance and Reached Record Lows in 2007
65
Reasons for US P/C Insurer Impairments, 1969–2010
3.6%4.0%
8.6%
7.3%
7.8%
7.1%
7.8%13.6%
40.3%
Source: A.M. Best: 1969-2010 Impairment Review, Special Report, April 2011.
Historically, Deficient Loss Reserves and Inadequate Pricing AreBy Far the Leading Cause of P-C Insurer Impairments.
Investment and Catastrophe Losses Play a Much Smaller Role
Deficient Loss Reserves/Inadequate Pricing
Reinsurance Failure
Rapid GrowthAlleged Fraud
Catastrophe Losses
Affiliate Impairment
Investment Problems (Overstatement of Assets)
Misc.
Sig. Change in Business
67
Number of Recessions Endured by P/C Insurers, by Number of Years in Operation
32
27
20
13
8
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1-50 51-75 76-100 101-125 126-150
Sources: Insurance Information Institute research from National Bureau of Economic Research data.
Number of Recessions Since 1860
Many US Insurers Are Close to a Century Old or Older
Number of Years in Operation
Insurers are true survivors—not just of natural catastrophes but also economic ones
68
Performance by Segment:Personal & Commercial Lines
Capital Excess (Deficit) Annual Change in CapitalRecord Policyholder Surplus (Capital) Resulted in Significant Excess Capital in the P/C
Insurance Sector in 2010. Deteriorating Underwriting Losses, Higher CAT Activity, More Modest Market Returns Shrank Excess Capital in 2011 by Nearly Half.
Annual Change in Policyholder Surplus
2000-2002: Tech bubble bursts,
9/11, high underwriting losses erode capital base
2005: Katrina, Rita, Wilma produce record CAT losses
2006/07: Low CAT losses, strong underwriting results since 1940s
increase capital
2008: Financial crisis causes sharp drop in
capital
2009-10: End of financial crisis,
rising asset prices. modest
u/w losses push capital to record levels
Note: The assumption of a 0.9:1 P/S ratio is derived from a Feb. 2011 announcement by Advisen, Ltd., that the US P/C insurance industry has $74 billion in excess capital. The implied P/S ratio (calculated by III) is 0.88:1, which was rounded to 0.9:1.Source: Insurance Information Institute calculations from A.M. Best and ISO data. * Net Premiums Written
High cats, u/w losses push capital down
77
$1
2,1
30
.5
$3
9,5
07
.0
$1
8,1
42
.5
$1
0,6
46
.5
$9
84
.0
$4
18
.7
$2
2,0
29
.6
$5
86
.3
$1
0,3
89
.9
$4
,75
7.7
$1
7,3
46
.9
$1
6,1
14
.4
$5
,55
2.5
$6
,97
4.1
$8
,86
9.7
74
87
66
48 47
24
53
69
51
5656
5552
42
40
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11*
(Va
lue
of
De
als
$ M
ill)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Nu
mb
er o
f De
als
Value of Deals $ Mill)
Number of Deals
*2011 data are through December 1.Source: SNL Securities; Insurance Information Institute.
M&A Activity in the US P/C Insurance Industry, 1997-2011*
P/C M&A activity in 2011 is up 60% since 2008, its highest level (in $ terms) since 2008
M&A Activity in the P/C Insurance Industry Remains Well Below its 1990s Peak
83
3. REINSURANCE MARKET CONDITIONS
Record Global Catastrophes Activity is
Pressuring Pricing
85
Reinsurer Share of Recent Significant Market Losses
Source: Insurance Information Institute from reinsurance share percentages provided in RAA, ABIR and CEA press release, Jan. 13, 2011.
Billions of 2011 Dollars
$0$5
$10$15$20$25$30$35$40
JapanEarthquake/
Tsunami (Mar2011)
New Zealand Earthquake (Feb
2011)
Thailand Floods(Aug - Nov 2011)
Chile Earthquake(Feb. 2010)
AustraliaCyclone/ Floods(Jan-Feb 2011)
Reinsurer SharePrimary Insurer Share
40% Reinsurance share of total insured loss
Reinsurers Paid a High Proportion of Insured Losses Arising from Major Catastrophic Events Around the World in Recent Years
$0.4$4.0
$22.5$9.5
$15.0
$3.5
$37.5
$13.0
$6.0
$10.0
$7.9
$8.3
$2.2$2.8
$5.0
73%60%
95%44%
Source: Guy Carpenter, GC Capital Ideas.com, September 26, 2011.
Global Property Catastrophe Rate on Line Index, 1990-2011 YTD (6/1/11)
A modest increase in global property catastrophe reinsurance pricing was evident in June 1 renewals in
the wake of record global catastrophe losses.
Jan. 1, 2012 renewals were up modestly or flat in the US but higher in CAT-impacted areas.
Source: Guy Carpenter, GC Capital Ideas.com, November 23, 2011.
Historical Capital Levels of Guy Carpenter Reinsurance Composite, 1998—2Q11
Most excess reinsurance capacity was removed from the market in 2011, but there does not
appear to be a shortage, leading relatively flat 2012
reinsurance renewals except in areas hit
hard by CATs.
4. RENEWED PRICING DISCIPLINE
90
Is There Evidence of a Broad and Sustained Shift in Pricing?
Soft Market Persisted in 2010 but Growth Returned: More in 2011?
(Percent)1975-78 1984-87 2000-03
*2011 and 2012 figures are A.M. Best EstimatesShaded areas denote “hard market” periodsSources: A.M. Best (historical and forecast), ISO, Insurance Information Institute.
Net Written Premiums Fell 0.7% in 2007 (First Decline
Since 1943) by 2.0% in 2008, and 4.2% in 2009, the First 3-Year Decline Since 1930-33.
NWP was up 4.1% (est.) in
20112012
expected growth is
4.2%
92
P/C Net Premiums Written: % Change, Quarter vs. Year-Prior Quarter
Sources: ISO, Insurance Information Institute.
Finally! Back-to-back quarters of net written premium growth(vs. the same quarter, prior year)
10.2
%15
.1%
16.8
%16
.7%
12.5
%10
.1%
9.7%
7.8%
7.2%
5.6%
2.9%
5.5%
-4.6
%-4
.1%
-5.8
%-1
.6%
10.3
%10
.2% 13
.4%
6.6%
-1.6
%2.
1%0.
0%-1
.9%
0.5%
-1.8
%-0
.7%
-4.4
%-3
.7%
-5.3
%-5
.2%
-1.4
%-1
.3%
1.3% 2.
3%1.
3%3.
5%1.
6%4.
1%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
2002
:Q1
2002
:Q2
2002
:Q3
2002
:Q4
2003
:Q1
2003
:Q2
2003
:Q3
2003
:Q4
2004
:Q1
2004
:Q2
2004
:Q3
2004
:Q4
2005
:Q1
2005
:Q2
2005
:Q3
2005
:Q4
2006
:Q1
2006
:Q2
2006
:Q3
2006
:Q4
2007
:Q1
2007
:Q2
2007
:Q3
2007
:Q4
2008
:Q1
2008
:Q2
2008
:Q3
2008
:Q4
2009
:Q1
2009
:Q2
2009
:Q3
2009
:Q4
2010
:Q1
2010
:Q2
2010
:Q3
2010
:Q4
2011
:Q1
2011
:Q2
2011
:Q3
Through 2011:Q3, growth in personal lines
predominating cos. (+3.1%) and commercial lines predominating cos.
(+3.9%), diversified (+2.3%)
93
Monthly Change* in Auto Insurance Prices, 1991–2011*
*Percentage change from same month in prior year; through November 2011; seasonally adjustedNote: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institutes.
Investment Gains through Q3:2011 Were Surprisingly Robust. Investment Gains Recovered Significantly in 2010 Due to Realized Investment Gains;
The Financial Crisis Caused Investment Gains to Fall by 50% in 2008
1 Investment gains consist primarily of interest, stock dividends and realized capital gains and losses.* 2005 figure includes special one-time dividend of $3.2B.Sources: ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
($ Billions)
Investment gains through Q3:2011 were $2.1B above the
same period in 2010—a surprise given falling rates
and flat stock markets
106
P/C Insurer Net Realized Capital Gains/Losses, 1990-2011:3Q
Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute.
Insurers Are Posting Net Realized Capital Gains in 2011 for the First Time Since 2007. Realized Capital Losses Were the Primary Cause
of 2008/2009’s Large Drop in Profits and ROE
($ Billions)$11.2B positive swing
107
U.S. 10-Year Treasury Note Yields:A Long Downward Trend, 1990–2011*
*Monthly, through November 2011 Note: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: Federal Reserve Bank at http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h15/data/Monthly/H15_TCMNOM_Y10.txt National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institutes.
Yields on 10-Year U.S. Treasury Notes have been essentially
below 5% for nearly a decade.
Since roughly 80% of P/C bond/cash investments are in 10-year or shorter durations, most P/C insurer portfolios will have low-yielding bonds for years to come.
Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Blue Chip Economic Indicators, 10/11 and 1/12 (forecasts).
The slack in the U.S. economy suggests that inflationary pressures should remain subdued for an extended period of times. Energy, health care and
commodity prices, plus U.S. debt burden, remain longer-run concerns
Annual Inflation Rates (%)
Inflation peaked at 5.6% in August 2008 on high energy and commodity crisis. The recession and the collapse of the
commodity bubble reduced inflationary pressures in 2009/10
Higher energy, commodity and food
prices pushed up inflation in 2011, but
not longer turn inflationary
expectations.
P/C Personal Insurance Claim Cost Drivers Grow Faster Than the Core CPI Suggests
*Nov 2011 over Nov 2010.Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
3.4%
2.2%
6.8%
5.1%
4.0%
3.1% 3.1%2.8%
6.4%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
Overall CPI "Core" CPI InpatientHospitalServices
OutpatientHospitalServices
PrescriptionDrugs
Medical CareCommodities
LegalServices
Motor VehicleParts &
Equipment
ResidentialMaint. &Repair
Price Changes in 2011*
Healthcare costs are a major liability, med pay, and PIP claim cost driver. They are likely to grow faster than the CPI for the next few years, at least
WC Medical Severity Risingat Twice the Medical CPI Rate
Sources: Med CPI from US Bureau of Labor Statistics, WC med severity from NCCI based on NCCI states.
The average annual increase in WC medical severity from 1995 through 2009 was nearly twice the medical CPI (7.6% vs. 3.9%). Will healthcare reform affect this gap?
The Strength of the Economy Will Influence P/C Insurer
Growth Opportunities
132
Growth Would Also Help Absorb Excess Capital
133
US Real GDP Growth*
* Estimates/Forecasts from Blue Chip Economic Indicators.Source: US Department of Commerce, Blue Economic Indicators 1/12; Insurance Information Institute.
2.7
%0
.9%
3.2
%2
.3%
2.9
%-0
.7%
0.6
%-4
.0%
-6.8
% -4.9
%-0
.7%
1.6
%5
.0%
3.9
%3
.8%
2.5
%2
.3%
0.4
%1
.3%
1.8
% 3.1
%2
.0%
2.3
%2
.3%
2.7
%2
.6%
2.7
%2
.8%
3.0
%4.1
%1
.1%
1.8
%2
.5% 3.6
%3
.1%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
2
00
0
2
00
1
2
00
2
2
00
3
2
00
4
2
00
5
2
00
6
07
:1Q
07
:2Q
07
:3Q
07
:4Q
08
:1Q
08
:2Q
08
:3Q
08
:4Q
09
:1Q
09
:2Q
09
:3Q
09
:4Q
10
:1Q
10
:2Q
10
:3Q
10
:4Q
11
:1Q
11
:2Q
11
:3Q
11
:4Q
12
:1Q
12
:2Q
12
:3Q
12
:4Q
13
:1Q
13
:2Q
13
:3Q
13
:4Q
Demand for Insurance Continues To Be Impacted by Sluggish Economic Conditions, but the Benefits of Even Slow Growth Will Compound and
Gradually Benefit the Economy Broadly
Real GDP Growth (%)
Recession began in Dec. 2007. Economic toll of credit crunch, housing
slump, labor market contraction has been
severe but modest recovery is underway
The Q4:2008 decline was the steepest since the Q1:1982 drop of 6.8%
Dollar Value* of Manufacturers’ Shipments Monthly, Jan 1992-Nov 2011
*seasonally adjusted Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Full Report on Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and Orders, November 2011, Jan. 4, 2012
Monthly shipments are nearly back to peak (in July 2008, 6 months into the recession). Trough in May 2009. Growth from trough to November 2011 was 27.8%
$ Millions
The value of Manufacturing Shipments in Nov. 2011 is up 27.8% to $455B from its May 2009 trough. Nov. figure is only 6.2% below its
previous record high.
58
.3
57
.1
60
.4
59
.6
57
.8
55
.3
55
.1
55
.2
55
.3 56
.9 58
.2
58
.5 60
.8
61
.4
61
.2
60
.4
53
.5 55
.3
50
.9
50
.6 51
.6
50
.8 52
.7 53
.9
40
45
50
55
60
65
Jan
-10
Fe
b-1
0
Ma
r-1
0
Ap
r-1
0
Ma
y-1
0
Jun
-10
Jul-
10
Au
g-1
0
Se
p-1
0
Oct
-10
No
v-1
0
De
c-1
0
Jan
-11
Fe
b-1
1
Ma
r-1
1
Ap
r-1
1
Ma
y-1
1
Jun
-11
Jul-
11
Au
g-1
1
Se
p-1
1
Oct
-11
No
v-1
1
De
c-1
1
ISM Manufacturing Index(Values > 50 Indicate Expansion)
January 2010 through December 2011
The manufacturing sector has been expanding and adding jobs. The question is whether this will continue.
Source: Institute for Supply Management; Insurance Information Institute
Optimism among manufacturers may be increasing in late 2011
74
.4
73
.6
73
.6
72
.2
73
.6 76
67
.8
68
.9
68
.2
67
.7 71
.6 74
.5
74
.2 77
.5
67
.5 69
.8
74
.3
71
.5
63
.7
55
.7 59
.4 60
.9 64
.1
69
.9
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
Jan
-10
Fe
b-1
0
Ma
r-1
0
Ap
r-1
0
Ma
y-1
0
Jun
-10
Jul-
10
Au
g-1
0
Se
p-1
0
Oct
-10
No
v-1
0
De
c-1
0
Jan
-11
Fe
b-1
1
Ma
r-1
1
Ap
r-1
1
Ma
y-1
1
Jun
-11
Jul-
11
Au
g-1
1
Se
p-1
1
11
-Oct
11
-No
v
11
-De
c
Consumer Sentiment Survey (1966 = 100)
January 2010 through December 2011
Consumer confidence has been low for years amid high unemployment, falling home prices and other factors adversely
impact consumers, but improved substantially in late 2011
Source: University of Michigan; Insurance Information Institute
Optimism among consumers is recovering, in part due to an
improving jobs outlook, after plunging amid the debt debate debacle and S&P downgrade
142
Value* of Construction Put In Place,Monthly, Nov ‘08-Nov ‘11
Sources: American Bankruptcy Institute at http://www.abiworld.org/AM/AMTemplate.cfm?Section=Home&TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=61633 ; Insurance Information Institute
Significant Exposure Implications for All Commercial Lines as Business Bankruptcies Begin to Decline
2010 bankruptcies totaled 56,282, down 7.5% from 60,837 in 2009—which were up 40% from 2008 and the most since 1993. As of
Business Starts Were Down Nearly 20% in the Recession, Holding Back Most Types of Commercial Insurance Exposure
* Data through March 31, 2011 are the latest available as of January 16, 2012; Seasonally adjustedSource: Bureau of Labor Statistics, http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cewbd.t08.htm.
(Thousands)
722,000 new business starts were recorded in 2010, up 3.6% from 697,000 in 2009, which was the slowest year for new business starts since 1993.
Business starts remained weak in early 2011.
Business Starts2006: 872,0002007: 843,0002008: 790,0002009: 697,000 2010: 722,000
11 Industries for the Next 10 Years: Insurance Solutions Needed
Shipping (Rail, Marine, Trucking)
Health Sciences
Health Care
Energy (Traditional)
Alternative Energy
Agriculture
Natural Resources
Environmental
Technology (incl. Biotechnology)
Light Manufacturing
Export-Oriented Industries
Many industries are
poised for growth, but
many insurers do not write in
these economic segments
148
Labor Market Trends
Massive Job Losses Sapped the Economy and Commercial/Personal
Lines Exposure, But Trend is Improving
149
Unemployment and Underemployment Rates: Stubbornly High in 2011, But Falling
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Jan00
Jan01
Jan02
Jan03
Jan04
Jan05
Jan06
Jan07
Jan08
Jan09
Jan10
Jan11
Traditional Unemployment Rate U-3
Unemployment + Underemployment Rate U-6
Unemployment stood at 8.5% in
December
Unemployment peaked at 10.1% in October 2009, highest monthly rate since 1983.
Peak rate in the last 30 years:
10.8% in November -
December 1982
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
U-6 went from 8.0% in March
2007 to 17.5% in October 2009; Stood at 15.2%
in Dec. 2011
January 2000 through December 2011, Seasonally Adjusted (%)
Recession ended in
November 2001
Unemployment kept rising for
19 more months
Recession began in
December 2007
Stubbornly high unemployment and underemployment constrain overall economic growth, but the job market might finally be improving
Dec 11
186
7921
365
127
42 15-1
09-1
465 97
23-1
2-8
5 -58
-161
-253 -230
-257
-347
-456
-547
-734 -6
67-8
06-7
07-7
44-6
49-3
34-4
52-2
97 -215 -186
-262
75-8
316
62
229
51 6111
714
311
2 193
128 16
794
261
219
241
99 7517
372
220
120
134 21
2
144
(1,000)
(800)
(600)
(400)
(200)
0
200
400
Jan-
07F
eb-0
7M
ar-0
7A
pr-0
7M
ay-0
7Ju
n-07
Jul-0
7A
ug-0
7S
ep-0
7O
ct-0
7N
ov-0
7D
ec-
Jan-
08F
eb-0
8M
ar-0
8A
pr-0
8M
ay-0
8Ju
n-08
Jul-0
8A
ug-0
8S
ep-0
8O
ct-0
8N
ov-0
8D
ec-
Jan-
09F
eb-0
9M
ar-0
9A
pr-0
9M
ay-0
9Ju
n-09
Jul-0
9A
ug-0
9S
ep-0
9O
ct-0
9N
ov-0
9D
ec-
Jan-
10F
eb-1
0M
ar-1
0A
pr-1
0M
ay-1
0Ju
n-10
Jul-1
0A
ug-1
0S
ep-1
0O
ct-1
0N
ov-1
0D
ec-
Jan-
11F
eb-1
1M
ar-1
1A
pr-1
1M
ay-1
1Ju
n-11
Jul-1
1A
ug-1
1S
ep-1
1O
ct-1
1N
ov-1
1D
ec-
Monthly Change in Private Employment
January 2008 through November 2011* (Thousands)
Private Employers Added 3.343 million Jobs Since Jan. 2010 After Having Shed 4.66 Million Jobs in 2009 and 3.81 Million in 2008 (State and Local Governments Have Shed Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/ces/home.htm; Insurance Information Institute
Monthly Losses in Dec. 08–Mar. 09 Were
the Largest in the Post-WW II Period
212,000 private sector jobs were created in
December
154
Unemployment Rates by State, November 2011:Highest 25 States*
13.0
11.3
10.6
10.5
10.5
10.0
10.0
10.0
9.9
9.9
9.8
9.4
9.1
9.1
9.1
9.0
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.5
8.5
8.4
8.2
8.1
8.0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
NV CA DC MS RI FL IL NC GA SC MI KY NJ OR TN IN US AL AZ WA ID OH CT MO TX AR
Une
mpl
oym
ent R
ate
(%)
*Provisional figures for November 2011, seasonally adjusted.
Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
In November, 43 states and the District of Columbia reported over-the-month unemployment rate decreases, 3 had
increases, and 4 had no change.
155
8.0
8.0
7.9
7.9
7.6
7.3
7.3
7.1
7.0
7.0
6.9
6.9
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.4
6.2
6.1
5.9
5.8
5.7
5.3
5.2
4.3
4.1
3.4
0
2
4
6
8
10
CO NY PA WV DE AK WI MT ME MA LA MD HI KS NM UT VA OK MN WY IA VT NH SD NE ND
Une
mpl
oym
ent R
ate
(%)
Unemployment Rates By State, November 2011: Lowest 25 States*
*Provisional figures for November 2011, seasonally adjusted.Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
In November, 43 states and the District of Columbia reported over-the-month
unemployment rate decreases, 3 had increases, and 4 had no change.
156
US Unemployment Rate
4.5
%
4.5
%
4.6
%
4.8
%
4.9
% 5.4
% 6.1
%
6.9
%
8.1
%
9.3
%
9.6
% 10
.0%
9.7
%
9.6
%
9.6
%
8.9
%
9.1
%
9.1
%
8.7
%
8.7
%
8.7
%
8.6
%
8.5
%
8.7
%
8.7
%
8.6
%
8.5
%
9.6
%4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
07
:Q1
07
:Q2
07
:Q3
07
:Q4
08
:Q1
08
:Q2
08
:Q3
08
:Q4
09
:Q1
09
:Q2
09
:Q3
09
:Q4
10
:Q1
10
:Q2
10
:Q3
10
:Q4
11
:Q1
11
:Q2
11
:Q3
11
:Q4
12
:Q1
12
:Q2
12
:Q3
12
:Q4
12
:Q1
12
:Q2
12
:Q3
12
:Q4
Rising unemployment eroded payrolls
and workers comp’s
exposure base.
Unemployment peaked at 10% in
late 2009.
* = actual; = forecastsSources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (1/12); Insurance Information Institute
Payroll vs. Workers Comp Net Written Premiums, 1990-2011
*Private employment; Shaded areas indicate recessions. Payroll and WC premiums for 2011 is I.I.I. estimateSources: NBER (recessions); Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis at http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/WASCUR ; NCCI; I.I.I.
Resumption of payroll growth and rate increases suggests WC NWP will grow again in 2012
7/90-3/91 3/01-11/0112/07-6/09
$Billions $Billions
WC premium volume dropped two years before
the recession began
WC net premiums written were down $14B or 29.3% to
$33.8B in 2010 after peaking at $47.8B
in 2005
www.iii.org
Thank you for your timeand your attention!
Twitter: twitter.com/bob_hartwigDownload at www.iii.org/presentations