Top Banner
GOR 2014 Analysis of the online marketing mix in the premium car segment
20
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Case Study Wettbewerbsanalyse

GOR 2014

Analysis of the online marketing mix in the premium car segment

Page 2: Case Study Wettbewerbsanalyse

Research Questions

2

Page 3: Case Study Wettbewerbsanalyse

Research Questions

3

The Internet

How do experts perceive the communication on the internet and how would they rate it?

How do consumers perceive the brands on

the internet?

What happens if a (potential) customer expresses online an

interest in purchasing?

Premium Car Segment

Page 4: Case Study Wettbewerbsanalyse

Study Design

4

Page 5: Case Study Wettbewerbsanalyse

Methods

5

The Internet

Online Expert Forum

Semi-automated Webscanner

Market Monitoring (CRM functions on

websites)

Premium Car Segment

Page 6: Case Study Wettbewerbsanalyse

Semi-automated Webscanner

How do consumers perceive the brands on the internet?

6

Page 7: Case Study Wettbewerbsanalyse

Search terms: General automotive term + brand name

Marketing / Communications term + brand name Term of brand core + brand name

Search Terms and Results

Scan of blogs, forums, news sites and social networks Limitation: Free Access

Surrounding Tonality Criticism

Objective recording and coding of ongoing communication

7

Page 8: Case Study Wettbewerbsanalyse

Fictive Example: Surrounding of BMW

68%

16%

10%

6%

+

+

+ +

One third of the comments also includes Audi and/or Mercedes, which shows that all three brands define the premium car segment.

Assumption: Caused to the bigger overlap of Audi and BMW in comparison to the overlap of BMW and Mercedes, these brands are more competitive.

8

Page 9: Case Study Wettbewerbsanalyse

Fictive Example: Tonality of Comments

quality

design

technology

68% 21%

8%

8%

4%

56% 36%

40% 56%

negative neutral positive Mentions

Positive mentions predominate in all three dimensions. Assumptions: Less neutral mentions concerning quality shows that this topic

polarises. Highest share of neutral mentions concerning (new) technology could be a signal for the fact that new technologies need to prove value.

9

Page 10: Case Study Wettbewerbsanalyse

Criticism of brands

13% Comments including

problems with brands

Analysis and segmentation of problems

Plan for the future: Early-Warning-System

Definition of standardised search terms

based on segmentation of problems

Webscanner alerts, if:

Total Share of comments including problems increases significantly

Share of single problem segments increases significantly

10

Page 11: Case Study Wettbewerbsanalyse

Online Expert Forum

How do experts perceive the communication and how would they

rate it?

11

Page 12: Case Study Wettbewerbsanalyse

Participants Online Expert Forum

30 Participants with the following criteria:

> 30 years old

Higher education

Managers with professional experience > 10 years

High to very high marketing relevance in daily professional life

Good to very good knowledge of Web 2.0 / Social Media

12

Page 13: Case Study Wettbewerbsanalyse

Topics of Online Expert Forum

Base Questionnaire

Detailed discussion Online Expert Forum

Results of Web-Scanning

General Rules für communication in times of Web 2.0 Specifics in premium car segment

Meaningful platforms for web communication Rating of actual web appearances

13

Page 14: Case Study Wettbewerbsanalyse

Criteria for Communication

Being up-to-date Dialogue / Interactivity Additional Benefit

Premium Quality

General criteria for communication on the internet

Criterion for communication in premium car segment

14

Page 15: Case Study Wettbewerbsanalyse

Meaningful Platforms for Communication in Premium Car Segment

Effectivity Range

Facebook

Twitter

Youtube / WebTV

Forums

Blogs

Rating of Experts

15

Page 16: Case Study Wettbewerbsanalyse

Market monitoring (CRM functions on website)

What happens if a (potential) customer expresses online an interest

in purchasing?

16

Page 17: Case Study Wettbewerbsanalyse

Link into the “Real World“

Test drive Information material Car Configurator

Analysis and segmentation of problems

Criteria for web communication

Market Monitoring (CRM functions on website)

17

Page 18: Case Study Wettbewerbsanalyse

Performance Check

Analysis: What happens after the contact?

Call Mail E-Mail Newsletter

Customer Service

Dealer

Example of ideal process

Test person configurates car on website

Automated confirmation

E-Mail

Data comparison

E-Mail from dealer

Call from dealer

Affilliation to mailing list and dealer newsletter

18

Page 19: Case Study Wettbewerbsanalyse

Possible Disruptions

Aggregation of all monitored processes

Identification of possible disruptions

No reaction to activities

Delayed reaction

Content not pemium-like e.g. dealer newsletter / calls

Other problems which were mentioned at comments on the internet

Optimization of Lead-Management-System, contents and appearances

19

Page 20: Case Study Wettbewerbsanalyse

HAGSTOTZ · ITM GmbH Saint-Andre-Str. 9 75203 Königsbach-Stein

Phone: +49 (0) 7232 / 3 19 09 - 0 Fax: +49 (0) 7232 / 3 19 09 - 19 E-Mail: [email protected] www.hagstotz-itm.de

20

If you are interested in Hagstotz ITM as a market research partner or if there are any

questions concerning this project don‘t hesitate to contact us…