Top Banner
Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market Anne Goodchild Assistant Professor Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Washington May 23, 2008
30

Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Feb 09, 2016

Download

Documents

Pearl

Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market. Anne Goodchild Assistant Professor Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Washington May 23, 2008. Pacific Highway Crossing $43 Million in trade each day 500,000 trucks in 2005 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Anne GoodchildAssistant Professor

Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of Washington

May 23, 2008

Page 2: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

• Pacific Highway Crossing

– $43 Million in trade each day

– 500,000 trucks in 2005

– 4th busiest N. border commercial crossing

– Busiest crossing W. of Detroit

– Transit times can be long & unpredictable

– Congested during peak periods

– Connects the mega regions of Vancouver and Seattle.

Courtesy of WCOG

Page 3: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Only top 5 crossing West of Mississippi

Top 5 US/Canada Border Crossing (2006)

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

160,000

180,000

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Months

Num

ber o

f Cro

ssin

gs

WA:Blaine

NY:Champlain-Rouses Pt.

NY:Buffalo-Niagara Falls

MI:Port Huron

MI:Detroit

US Census Bureau, 2008

Page 4: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Top 5 US/Mexico CrossingsTop 5 US/Mexico Border Crossings (2006)

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

160,000

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Months

Num

ber o

f Cro

ssin

gs

TX:Laredo

TX:Hidalgo

TX:El Paso

CA:Otay Mesa/San Ysidro

CA:Calexico East

US Census Bureau, 2008

Page 5: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Champlain-Rouses Point, NY Southbound vehicle commodity data

Tanning & Dye Ext Etc; Dye, Paint, Putty Etc; Inks, 44,377,

35%

Plastics And Articles Thereof, 242, 0%

Rubber And Articles Thereof, 22,397, 17%Spec Wov Fabrics; Tufted

Fab; Lace; Tapestries Etc, 1,281, 1%

Articles Of Iron Or Steel, 43,876, 34%

60, 60, 0%

Electric Machinery Etc; Sound Equip; Tv Equip; Pts,

1,207, 1%

Furniture; Bedding Etc; Lamps Nesoi Etc; Prefab Bd,

15,071, 12%Special Classification

Provisions, Nesoi, 107, 0%

US Census Bureau, 2008

Page 6: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Pacific Highway Cross-Border Truck Commodities & Origin-Destination Patterns

Non-metallic products3%

Plastics and rubber2%

Prepared foodstuffs 3%

Base metals2%

Meat, fish, and seafood2%

Misc. manufactured products2%

Allied paper products4%

Agricultural products4%

Other18%

Wood products7%

Empty/Empty containers47%

Articles in base metal2%

Waste and scrap2%

Dominated by food and agricultural products (9%)Courtesy of WCOG

Page 7: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Motivation

• Much of the existing literature has overlooked the impact of border operations on agribusiness, and classifies it as non time sensitive

• For Cascadia, however, these are our most time critical goods, and are very important to the regional economy.

Page 8: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Border Crossing Process

Page 9: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Programs to reduce delay and increase trust

• Advance Electronic Presentation of Cargo Information (ACE )– Electronic manifest filing– More information submitted– Reduces errors– Process improvements: 2006 study shows

secondary inspections reduced by 50%– Now required for all crossers

Page 10: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Programs to reduce delay and increase trust

• Customs Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT)– Voluntary security practices that increase trust– Companies comply to reduce wait time– CBP introduced the program to increase

security

Page 11: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Programs to reduce delay and increase trust

• Free and Secure Trade (FAST)– Driver must be US citizen or permanent

resident– Passengers, driver, vehicle, goods, carrier,

and importer must all be FAST certified– Must be C-TPAT approved– Difficult for LTL and package carriers– Separate border infrastructure (8am-8pm)– Inspection and wait times significantly

reduced

Page 12: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Dataset Observations Mean StandardDeviation

90th Percentile

Arrival Rate

Average Service Time

WCOG FASTHalcrow, 2007)

579 22 minutes 21 minutes 21.5 Vehiclesper hour

86 Seconds

WCOG non-FAST(Halcrow, 2007)

1480 1 hour 23 minutes

26 minutes 21.5Vehicles per hour

119 seconds and 121 seconds

Probe, southbound(FAST)(Goodchild, et al)

5658 23 minutes 24 minutes 50 minutes

Probe, northbound(non-FAST)(Goodchild et al)

5805 23 minutes 20 minutes 45 minutes

Probe (overall)(Goodchild et al)

11,463 23 minutes 22 minutes 47 minutes

Delay Summary

Page 13: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

FAST Border Crossing Times

4 hours20 minutes

Page 14: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Seasonal Variation

0:00:00

0:14:24

0:28:48

0:43:12

0:57:36

1:12:00

1:26:24

Janua

ry

Febru

ary

March

AprilM

ayJu

neJu

ly

August

September

Octobe

r

November

Decem

ber

Tim

e (m

in)

NB Average

NB Standard Devia tionSB Average

SB Standard Devia tion

Page 15: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Disruptionsoff-hours

0:00:00

0:28:48

0:57:36

1:26:24

1:55:12

2:24:00

2:52:48

3:21:36

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Tim

e (m

in) NB Average

NB Standard DeviationSB AverageSB Standard Deviation

Page 16: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

0:00:00

0:14:24

0:28:48

0:43:12

0:57:36

1:12:00

1:26:24

Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday

Tim

e (m

in) NB Average

NB Standard DeviationSB AverageSB Standard Deviation

SB more variable

Page 17: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Delay summary

• Variability more difficult for supply chain management than average.

• Average lower in low flow times, but variability increased

• NB and SB have different operating characteristics that affect delay

Page 18: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Days with >2 hour observations

Page 19: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Previous Research• Impact of border crossing time variability on regional

supply chains

• Examination of the cause of very long delays (>2 hours)

• Description of Cascadia regional freight transportation

• Examination of long-term delay patterns– Seasonal patterns– Daily patterns

Data from Pacific Highway Crossing, GPS data, manifest data, truck counts, operations survey, interviews with carriers

Page 20: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Previous Research Findings• Variability in delay increases cost beyond average delay

• Delays are dramatically reduced for FAST approved trucks

• Very long delays (> 2 hours) are very problematic

• Regional industry is not tightly scheduled due to typical distances and ability to predict travel times

• Cascadia has a unique profile with different issues than Michigan/Ontario crossings

Page 21: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Supply Chain Responses to DelayStrategy Motivation Consequence

Routing Changes Address average crossing time

•Reduces the impact of variability on operations

Schedule changes

Address average crossing time

•Reduces the impact of variability on operations

Reduce level of activity in cross-border trade

Address average crossing time and increased documentation requirements

•Reduce impact of variability on operations•Stop providing courier or same day service•Reduce revenue to carrier and level of cross border economic activity

Change transportation mode

Address average crossing time

•Change border procedures which, depending on local circumstances, may improve travel time reliability

Page 22: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Supply Chain Responses to Variability and Documentation

Strategy Motivation Consequence

Increase buffer times

Address crossing time variability

• Reduces capacity of existing infrastructure or requires additional hires and equipment

• Increases transportation and inventory cost • Reduces late arrivals and stock-outs

Increase dwell times at intermediate handling facilities

Address crossing time variability

• Reduces impact of delay on outbound vehicles, particularly relevant for LTL (less than truckload) operations

• Increases total transit time and therefore inventory cost

Hire full time border logistics staff

Increased documentation requirements

• Primarily Canadian firms • Necessary to meet regulatory requirements

Page 23: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market
Page 24: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Recommendations• Take advantage of existing programs where possible

– FAST, C-TPAT, ACE– Ensure paperwork in place at all exchange points– Our current research shows this is responsible for about 25% of

border delay• Learn about the performance of borders used

– Cross outside of high flow hours but within program hours– Use lower volume crossings– Locate terminals before border crossing– Consider other modes

• Dedicate resources to managing these issues

Page 25: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Approximate location of BC Piezo WIM

FAST lane SB

Non FAST SB

Non FAST route for parking and rejoining queue - SB

Primary

RPM Primary

All trucks NB

NB holding for outbound paperwork

NB Route for parking if still need to file entry, secondary inspection, etc.

Signal-controlled stop-bar for non-

FAST trucks

Future (2yrs) NB truck alignment

Page 26: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Delay is consistent

0:14:24

0:43:12

1:12:00

1:40:48

2:09:36

2:38:24

3:07:12

7:12:00 8:24:00 9:36:00 10:48:00 12:00:00 13:12:00 14:24:00 15:36:00 16:48:00 18:00:00 19:12:00

Arrival Time

Ave

rage

5 m

inut

e de

lay

Page 27: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market

Southbound Routes

ORIGINS

  West Lower Mainland Rest BC Alberta East Lower

Mainland Whatcom WestCanada

EastCanada TOTAL

DESTINATIONS

Alaska 0.1%   0.1%         0.2%

East Canada 0.1%             0.1%

Whatcom 10.5% 0.6% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1%   0.1% 11.6%

Puget Sound 34.9% 0.7% 0.8% 0.2%     0.4% 37.1%

West WA 4.4% 0.2% 0.1%         4.8%

East WA 3.2%             3.2%

West USA 28.4% 1.7% 0.7% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 31.0%

Rest USA 11.6% 0.4%           12.1%

TOTAL93.2% 3.7% 1.9% 0.4% 0.2% 0.1% 0.5%  

Puget Sound to Vancouver: 150 miles

Page 28: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market
Page 29: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market
Page 30: Cascadia Border Operations, Issues, and Consequences for the Agrifood Market