Page 1
Cariboo-ChilcotinAgriculture/WildfirePreparednessProject
OpportunitiesandBarrierstoWildfireRiskMitigation
Preparedfor
BCAgriculture&FoodClimateActionInitiative
CaribooCattlemen’sAssociation
Preparedby
CompassResourceManagementLtd.604.641.2875Suite210-111WaterStreetVancouver,BritishColumbiaCanadaV6B1A7www.compassrm.com
Date
June2016
InAssociationwith
and
H.Bayliff
Page 2
ii
StatementofLimitations
ThisreporthasbeenpreparedbyCompassResourceManagementLtd(“Compass”)anditspartnersfortheexclusiveuseandbenefitofCaribooCattlemen’sAssociation(“Clients”).ThisdocumentrepresentsthebestprofessionaljudgmentofCompassandourpartners,basedontheinformationavailableatthetimeofitscompletionandasappropriateforthescopeofwork.Serviceswereperformedaccordingtonormalprofessionalstandardsinasimilarcontextandforasimilarscopeofwork.
Page 3
iii
Acknowledgements
Thisreportwaspreparedfor:
TheCaribooCattlemen’sAssociationinpartnershipwiththeBCAgriculture&FoodClimateActionInitiative
Projectfundingprovidedby:
FundingforthisprojecthasbeenprovidedinpartbytheBeefCattleIndustryDevelopmentFundandinpartbyAgricultureandAgri-FoodCanadaandtheBCMinistryofAgriculturethroughtheInvestmentAgricultureFoundationofBCunderGrowing Forward 2,afederal-provincial-territorialinitiative.TheprogramisdeliveredbytheBCAgriculture&FoodClimateActionInitiative
Reportpreparedby:
CompassResourceManagement,Ltd.,B.A.Blackwell&Associates,andH.Bayliff
CaribooAgriculturalAdaptationProjectManagementCommittee:DuncanBarnettSamanthaCharltonAllenDobbJennyHuffmanGeneveJasperEmilyMacNairGregTegartDavidZirnhelt
CaribooAgriculturalAdaptationWorkingGroup:DuncanBarnettRobBorsatoJennyHuffmanGeneveJasperKarenMooresTomSalleyJoanSorley
Inaddition,CompasswouldliketothanktheagriculturalproducersandothersintheCaribooRegionwhoprovidedinformationduringthestudy.
AgricultureandAgri-FoodCanada(AAFC)andtheBCMinistryofAgriculturearecommittedtoworkingwithindustrypartners.OpinionsexpressedinthisdocumentarethoseoftheauthorandnotnecessarilythoseofAgricultureandAgri-FoodCanadaandtheBCMinistryofAgriculture.TheGovernmentofCanada,theBCMinistryofAgriculture,anditsdirectors,agents,employees,orcontractorswillnotbeliableforanyclaims,damages,orlossesofanykindwhatsoeverarisingoutoftheuseof,orrelianceupon,thisinformation.
Page 4
iv
ExecutiveSummaryBetweenMarch2015andJune2016,CompassResourceManagement,B.A.Blackwell&Associates,andH.BayliffengagedranchersintheCariboo-ChilcotinregioninaplanningprocesstoidentifytheopportunitiesandbarrierstomoreeffectivewildfireriskmanagementonranchlandpropertiesintheCaribooregionofBritishColumbia,andtopilotanapproachtoaddressingthatrisk.Thisdocumentfocusesontheoutcomesofindividualranchvisitsandmorewidelyattendedworkshopsdesignedtoinitiatediscussionsontheopportunitiesandbarrierstoimplementingwildfireriskmanagementstrategies.Morespecifically,wesoughtfeedbackonthetopicsoffuelsmanagementnearhigh-valueareas,andstructuralprotectionintheeventofwildfires.
TherearemanyopportunitiesforrangetenureholderstoapplyforpermitstocuttreesinthevicinityoffencelinesandotherranchinfrastructureundertheForestandRangePracticesActandtheRangePlanningandPracticesRegulation.However,twoimportantbarrierswereidentified:
• Ranchers’timeislimited,andfuelmitigationisunlikelytorisetoahighprioritylevelformostranchersinmostsituations.
• Theneedtodisposeoffuels(ratherthanleavethemontheground)limitsranchers’optionsforpermitstocutfuels,andmoreimportantly,presentsaseriousliabilityconcernforthemostcost-efficientmethodoffueldisposal,whichispileburning.
Themajoropportunityintermsofstructuralprotectionintheeventoffireswasrelatedtosprinklerprotectionunits(SPUs).Theseunitscouldbepurchased,maintained,andoperatedbylocalcattlemen’sassociations.Forthisopportunity,therewerealsotwokeybarriersidentifiedintheworkshops:
• Costcouldbeabarrier,buttheexactcostwilldependgreatlyonthedesignoftheunits.Anindividualranchmaynotbeabletoaffordafullkittoprotecttheirranch(atacostof$23,000),butasetof3kitstobedeployedinemergencies(atacostof$72,000)mightnotbeoutofthequestionforacattlemen’sassociation.
• AgreatdealofplanningeffortisneededtoensurethattheSPUsareusedcorrectlyandmaintainedwell.Inaddition,detailedoperatingguidelinesthatdictatewhoisresponsiblefortheSPUs,wheretheyarekept,andhowtheyaredeployedarecriticaltotheirsuccessfuluseinanemergencysituation.
Tomakeprogresstowardtacklingthesebarriers,weprovidethefollowinginsights:
• Withoutfinancialincentivesthatprovidethemwiththeflexibilitytodotheworkthemselvesortohireothers,ranchersasagroupareunlikelytomakeprogresstowardreducingfuelloadingacrosstheirranges.
• Rancherswouldbenefitgreatlyfromhelptodevelopdetailedfueltreatmentprescriptionsthatmakesmartuseoftheavailablepolicyoptions,andsimultaneouslyprovidelandscapescalebenefitthroughthedevelopmentoflandscape-scalefirebreaks.
• TechnicalandfinancialsupporttoaidthedevelopmentofdetailedoperatingprocedurescouldprovecriticaltoensuringthattheSPUsgetusedproperlyovertime.
Page 5
v
Contents
1 Introduction................................................................................................................................11.1 IdentifyingAppropriateManagementActions........................................................................2
2 Gaininginsightsintoopportunitiesandbarriers........................................................................33 Proactiveinterventiontoreducewildfireriskonrangelands....................................................43.1 Opportunities...........................................................................................................................43.2 Barriers.....................................................................................................................................6
4 EmergencyplanningforranchesintheCariboo........................................................................74.1 Opportunities...........................................................................................................................74.2 Barriers...................................................................................................................................10
5 Conclusionsandnextsteps......................................................................................................106 References................................................................................................................................127 Appendices...............................................................................................................................137.1 RegulationsonPileBurning...................................................................................................137.2 ConsequencesofviolatingcuttingpermitsorWildfireActprovisions..................................147.3 Additionalsprinklerkitspecifications:...................................................................................17
Figures
Figure1.Riskisaproductofthelikelihoodandconsequencesofafire,eachofwhichcanbeexpressedalongacontinuumoflowtohigh(left).Differentcombinationsoflevelsoflikelihoodandofconsequenceimplydifferentmanagementstrategies(right)......................................................2Figure2.Thistenureareanearranchinfrastructureshowshighfuelloadontheground(fallendead),andhighnumbersofunderstorytreesthatcanactasladderfuels.Thesesortsofareasmaybegoodcandidatesforfuelmanagementactions..........................................................................5Figure3.Exampleofasprinklerusedonarooftoptoprotectthebuildingfromembershowers.Photocredit:SmallFarmServices,Australia...........................................................................................8Figure4.Aschematicofcomponentsandgenerallayoutforasprinklerunitsetuponaruralproperty.Structuresarerepresentedinthefigurebyblackrectangles.(Swart,2016).........................9
Tables
Table1.ExamplemanagementactionsthatfallwithineachriskmanagementstrategyshowninFigure1................................................................................................................................................2Table2.Estimateofsprinklerunitcosts(Swart,2016)........................................................................17Table3.Sprinklercomponentspecifications(Swart,2016).................................................................17Table4.Examplesofstandbygeneratorunitprices,comparingKohler,Briggs&Stratton,andCumminsbrands...................................................................................................................................18
Page 6
1
1 Introduction
TheCariboo-Chilcotinregionexperienceswildfireonaregularbasis.Becauseranchersthereareoftengeographicallyisolatedandbecausetheirranchassetsaredistributedacrossafire-pronelandscape,theranchingcommunityintheregionis,ingeneral,exposedtoahighlevelofrisk.BetweenMarch2015andMay2016,CompassResourceManagement,B.A.Blackwell&Associates,andH.BayliffengagedranchersintheCariboo-Chilcotinregioninaplanningprocesstoidentifytheopportunitiesandbarrierstomoreeffectivewildfireriskmanagement.TheprojectwasledbytheCaribooCattlemen'sAssociationinpartnershipwiththeBCAgricultureandFoodClimateActionInitiative,theMinistryofAgricultureandotherpartners,withfourbroadgoals:
1. Minimizethedamagetoagriculturalproductivityandagriculturalinfrastructureassociatedwithwildfireevents,
2. Strengthen(agriculture-specific)informationandresourcestoassistproducerswithwildfiremitigation,preparednessandrecovery,
3. Improvecollaborationtosupportagriculturewithwildfirepreparedness,mitigationandrecovery,
4. Identifycosts,issuesandbarriersaroundimplementationofmitigationandpreparednessmeasures.
Theprocessweusedtoaccomplishthesegoalsisuniqueinthatitmaintainedfocussimultaneouslyonranchers’values–thethingsthatareimportanttothemandtotheirbusinesses–andonadeepunderstandingofforestconditionandwildfirebehaviour.
Theprojectresultedinfourprimarydeliverables:
1. Asummaryofwildfire-relatedresourcesrelevanttopreparedness,mitigation,andrecoveryactionsforranches,
2. Aranch-levelwildfirepreparednessplanningtemplatetoprovideguidancetootherranchesintheCariboo-Chilcotininpreparingforandmitigatingtheriskofwildfire,
3. Anevaluationofthepolicyopportunitiesandbarrierstomoreeffectivewildfireriskmitigationactivitiesforranches,basedonresearch,informationprovidedbytheprojectsponsorsandinputgainedintheprocessworkshops,and
4. Asummaryofthetransferableplanningprocesstohelpguidesimilarplanningprocessesinotherregions.
Ourapproachtothiskindofproblemseparatesthetwocomponentsofrisk–thelikelihoodandtheconsequencesofawildfire.Consideringthesetwoelementsseparatelyandinalloftheirpossiblecombinations(e.g.,lowlikelihoodandlowconsequencevs.lowlikelihoodbuthighconsequence)notonlyallowsustodifferentiatebetweendifferentkindsofrisk,butalsoallowsustoconsiderstrategiesforreducingriskthatmatchthetypeofriskitself(Figure1).Differentcombinationsoflevelsoflikelihoodandconsequenceimplydifferentstrategiesforreducingrisk.Forexample,whenawildfireisunlikelyandtheconsequencesshouldonehappenarenotimportant(lowerleft,leftsideofFigure1),thenanyefforttofurtherreducetheriskisprobably
Page 7
2
notwarranted(rightsideofFigure1).Ontheotherhand,iftheconsequencesorthelikelihood(orboth)arehigh,thentakingsomesortofactiontoreducetheriskmakesmoresense.
Figure1.Riskisaproductofthelikelihoodandconsequencesofafire,eachofwhichcanbeexpressedalongacontinuumoflowtohigh(left).Differentcombinationsoflevelsoflikelihoodandofconsequenceimplydifferentmanagementstrategies(right).
1.1 IdentifyingAppropriateManagementActions
Evenwiththeconceptualguidancesuggestedbyfigure1,implementingamanagementactionstillrequireschoicesaboutwhattodo,aswellaswhen,how,andwheretodoit.Forexample,fuelreductiontreatmentsareagoodtoolforreducingthelikelihoodofawildfire,particularlywhendoneclosetohigh-valueareas(Table1).However,choicesneedtobemadeaboutwhichfuelsshouldberemoved,overwhatschedule,andwhereonthelandscape.
Table1.ExamplemanagementactionsthatfallwithineachriskmanagementstrategyshowninFigure1.
ProactiveIntervention - Large-scalefuelreductiontreatments- Prescribedburns- Firebreaksaroundimportantinfrastructure- Replacevulnerablebuildingmaterials
Mitigation&Monitoring - Small-scaleopportunisticfuelreductiontreatments- Monitoringfirelikelihood(e.g.,updatingfuelsmaps)to
knowwhentotriggermoreactiveapproaches- Equipranchstaffwithbasicfiretoolstoextinguishsmall
firesonthepropertyEmergencyPlanning - Insurance
- SprinklerProtectionKits- EvacuationPlans- CertifyranchemployeesinS100training.
DoNothing - Noactions
Inallcaseswheretheprobabilityofwildfireishigh,choosingmanagementactionsfromthespectrumofpossibilitiesshouldreflectthescaleofthevaluesatrisk.Highvalueareaswith
ProactiveIntervention
Emergency PlansDo Nothing
Mitigation Monitoring
LowConsequence
Likelihood
High
High
Low
Consequence
Likelihood
LowHigh
High
Low
Assessed Risk Management Strategies
Page 8
3
criticalinfrastructureshouldreceivemanagementactionscommensuratewiththatvalue.Likewise,areaswithlowervalueassetsshouldreceivelessandlessintensiveactions,againcommensuratewiththescaleofthevalue.
Startingdownthepathtowardgoodchoicesofmanagementactionsrequiresunderstandingwhattheopportunitiesandbarrierstothevariousoptionsareforthose,includingwhichactionsarewithinthescopeofcontrolofthedecisionmaker–inourcase,ranchersintheCariboo.
Thisdocumentisthethirdoffourdeliverables,whichfocusesontheoutcomesofindividualranchvisitsandmorewidelyattendedworkshopsdesignedtoinitiatediscussionsontheopportunitiesandbarrierstoimplementingmanagementstrategiesthatmatchthenatureofriskthattheranchingcommunityfacesintheCariboo.
2 Gaininginsightsintoopportunitiesandbarriers
Inthefallof2015,weworkedwithsevenranchesacrosstheCariboo-ChilcotinRegiontoperformmorein-depthassessmentsofthesourcesofrisktotheirranches,andalsotodiscusssomeoftheirconcernswithvariousoptionsforriskmanagement.Twooptionsincludedfuelsmanagementnearhigh-valueareasoftheirranch,andstructuralprotectionintheeventofwildfires.
Inadditiontothesevisits,weheldtwoworkshops,oneinTatlaLakeandoneinWilliamsLake,togetfeedbackfromawideraudienceonthesametopics.TheseworkshopswereattendedbyrepresentativesfromTheCaribooRegionalDistrict,theWildfireServicesBranch(WSB),andtheMinistryofForests,LandsandNaturalResourceOperationsRangeOffice.Inaddition,eachworkshophadbetween15and18ranchersfromthelocalcommunities.Thisattendanceprovidedadiversityofperspectivesandexperiencerelatedtowildfireandwildfiremanagement.
Ineachworkshop,wefirstprovidedabriefreviewofthelessonswelearnedfromouranalysesandourranchvisits.Themajorlessonsfromthatphaseoftheprojectwerethatmostoftherisktothehighvaluepartsoftheranch–theranchheadquartersandthenetworkoffences–isfromhighfuelloadsinthetenures.Additionally,thesevenranchesthatwevisitedhaddonethethingsnecessarytocomplywithBCFireSmartguidelines,whicheffectivelyreducesthelikelihoodoffiresinthemainranchareas.Therefore,accordingtoFigure1,theappropriatestrategieswouldbetofocusonproactiveinterventionandmitigationinthetenureandemergencyplanningforthemainranchareas.Inaddition,Table1suggestsappropriateactionswithineachcategory.RancherinterestthatwasexpressedduringthefirstroundofworkshopsandduringourvisitsservedasthebasisforselectingparticularmanagementactionsfromTable1ascandidatesforfurtherdiscussion.
Thebulkofeachworkshopwasdevotedtodiscussingtheopportunitiesandbarrierstoproactiveinterventionoptionssuchasfuelreductiontreatmentsnearmainranchareasandfencelines,andtoemergencyplanningoptionssuchassprinklerkitsforbuildingprotectionintheeventofafire.Thesectionsbelowdescribetheoutcomesoftheseworkshops.
Page 9
4
3 Proactiveinterventiontoreducewildfireriskonrangelands
Ingeneral,weconsiderthepurposeofproactiveinterventionstobetoreducethelikelihoodofawildfireinhighvalueareas,ratherthantoreducetheconsequences(byremovingfences,forexample,ormovingbuildings).Thisgenerallyoccursbyeliminatingproblematicfuelsthoughafueltreatmentplan.However,becauseingeneralranchersdon’thaverightstothetimberintheirgrazingtenure,manyranchersexpressedsomeuncertaintyabouttheiroptionsforreducingfirerisk.
Thefollowingtwosectionsdescribethemajoropportunitiesforfuelreductionsforranchers,andthensomeofthemajorbarrierstoimplementingthoseoptions.
3.1 Opportunities
TherearemanyopportunitiesforrangetenureholderstocuttreesinthevicinityofranchinfrastructureunderdifferentregulationssuchastheForestandRangePracticesActandtheRangePlanningandPracticesRegulations.However,anycuttingoftimberunderanyregulationrequiresapermitapprovedbytheFLNRODistrictResourceManager.
ReducingfuelsaroundnewandexistingCrownfence
IftheCrownfenceisanewfence,thentheentireright-of-way(ROW)islikelytobeauthorizedwitha5-metreROW;theapproximatewidthneededforaquadanddrivertobedrivenoneitherside.IfthenewCrownfenceisconstructedinastandthatisgreyattack,forexample,therangetenureholdercouldgetauthorizationtomaketheROWatreelengthonbothsides.Agreyattackstandisaforeststandwithamajorityoftreeskilledbyinsects;thisphasegenerallybeginsfivetosevenyearsaftertheforestiskilled.Thistreelengthdistanceprovidesfortheprotectionofthefencefromtherealpotentialdamagefromwindthrowndeadtrees.ThisonlyappliestothosetreesthataredeadandmaythreatentheCrownfence.Inthecaseoffuturemaintenanceofthefenceinagreyattackedstand,thetenureholderwouldonlybeabletomaintaina4-meterROWwidthwiththeselegalauthorities.Notimbermarkandnostumpagewouldbechargedifthetreeswereleftonsite,thoughleavingthesefuelsinplacereducesthebenefittowildfirerisk.
InthecaseofexistingCrownfence,therangetenureholdercouldalsoapplyforapermitunderSection52ofFRPAtocutfuelsifthatfenceexistedwithinastandoftreesthatwerethreateningtheCrownfence,e.g.aninsectinfestedpatchorlargeareawithanumberoftreesthatcouldfallanddamagetheCrownfence.Similartotheexampleabove;theROWcouldthenbeatreelengthonbothsidesandwouldapplytodeadtreesofanydiameter.Notimbermarkandnostumpagewouldbechargedifthetreeswereleftonsiteandproperlydisposedof.IfapermitwasrequestedbyarangetenureholderthespecificationsforatreelengthROWoneachsidewouldneedtobeinwritingandsignedbytheDistrictResourceManager.
Page 10
5
Figure2.Thistenureareanearranchinfrastructureshowshighfuelloadontheground(fallendead),andhighnumbersofunderstorytreesthatcanactasladderfuels.Thesesortsofareasmaybegoodcandidatesforfuelmanagementactions.
Reducingfuelsnearranches,corrals,andotherhighvalueareas
AnauthorizationunderSection52ofFRPAshouldbeusedwheretheprojectinvolveslittleornomerchantabletimberandthetimberwillnotbesold.ApplyingfortheSection52israthersimplefromtherangelicenseestandpointandinvolvessendingaletterofrequestforaSection52(includinganattachedmapandplanfortreatmentandfueldisposal)totheDistrictResourceManager.
Rangelicenseesareallowedtocutdamagedordestroyedtimberwherethereisclearlynocommercialharvestingopportunity,aftersendingaletterofrequest(includinganattachedmapandplanfortreatmentandfueldisposal)totheDistrictResourceManager.Thetimbermustbeofsuchpoorqualitythatitcannotbesoldforanypurposeonceithasbeenharvested.Thisincludessmallpiecesize,branches,brush,dead,deteriorating,damagedorunderstorytrees,etc.Thisformofauthorizationistobeusedtoapproveactivitiessuchaspruning,spacing,pilingandburningandchippingoftimber.Insomecircumstancestheremaybesmallmerchantablevolumesinterspersedwiththenon-merchantabletimber.Itissuggestedthatasmallvolume(50m3)ofmerchantabletimbermaybecut,damagedordestroyedunderthisoption.However,itisrecognizedthatcertainsituationswillwarrantexceedingthissuggestedmaximum.Ifthissmallamountmaybeexceeded,theDistrictResourceManagermustbeinformedandtheprojectre-evaluated.Generally,thetimberwillnotberemovedfromthesite.However,anexemptioncanbeprovidedinthecasewherethetimberneedstoberemovedforfirehazardpurposesandwillnotbesoldtosomeoneelse(i.e.,removedtoacentrallocationfordisposal).ThisremovalrequiresawrittenexemptionbytheDistrictResourceManager.
Page 11
6
Afreeusepermit(undertheForestAct)couldbeusedwherethemerchantablevolumeinvolvedislessthan50m3andwherethetimberwillnotbesold.Thepurposeofthispermitistoallowtherangelicenseetousethetimberforagriculturalorpersonalusesuchasfenceimprovementsandfirewood.Thislikelyappliestosingleorsmallgroupsoflowvaluetrees.ThisfreeusepermitislikelytobeparticularlyusefulforCrowntimberthatisnearprivatelyownedranchinfrastructuresuchasprivatefences,corrals,andbuildings.Incontrast,theregulationsdescribedabovenormallyapplytoCrownassetssuchasCrownfence.Themainapplicationofthisoptionwillbetoauthorizepersonalfirewoodcutting(notforcommercialpurposes),andcouldtargetliveanddeadtreesofanysize.Thenumber,sizeclasslimitsandvolume(m3)wouldhavetobenegotiatedinthepermitwiththeMinistryofForests,LandsandNaturalResourceOperations.
Disposingoffuel
BABlackwellhasrecommendeddebrismanagementoptionslikechipping,lopandscatter,andoutrightremovalbytruck.Themostappropriatedebrisdisposalmethoddependsonwhichfuelmanagement/treecuttingoption(s)arechosen,whichinturndependsontheamountoffuel,costeffectivenessofthetreatment,andoperationalconstraints.Thefollowingaresomedebrismanagementoptions:
1. ChiporDragandRemove(CDAR)–thechippinganddraggingofdebrisandremovalfromthetreatmentsitefordisposal.Thisdebrismanagementmethodcanbeappliedinanyfueltypeortreatmenttypewhenthereisgoodaccessandremovalofthemajorityofsurfacefuelsispossible.Thisisgenerallyrecommendedwhenvehicleaccessiswithin50m.Draggingreferstodraggingdebristoamachine,suchasachipperoraircurtainburner,fordisposal.
2. ChipandLeave(CAL)–thechippingofdebrisanddistributionofdebrisonthesite.Thisdebrismanagementmethodmaybeutilizedfollowingahazardtreeremovaltreatmentwhensurfacefuelloadislowandtheamountofdebrisbeingchippedisminimal.Inthecourseofourdiscussions,someranchersexpressedconcernsoverchippingfuels(particularlywherethereislotsofdebristochip)andleavingtheminplace,citingpastexperienceswherethechipsdamagedcows’feet.It’sunclearwhetherthisisaconsistentproblemoronlyforsomesituations.
3. PileandBurn(PB)–Theuseofeithersmall(1.0mx1.0m)campfirepilesorlargerindustrialpilestoburnanddisposeofdebris.Thismethodcanbeimplementedinallfueltypesandonsiteswhereaccessislimitedorsitesareisolated.However,thereisconsiderableliabilityandplanningwithadviceofaprofessionalisadvised.Section7.1intheAppendicesprovidesdetailedinformationonregulationsthatpertaintopileburning.
3.2 Barriers
Themostconsistentbarriertoconductingfueltreatmentsthatranchersattheworkshopsidentifiedwastimeavailability.Overthecourseofthetwoworkshops,responsestoquestionsaboutwhetherrancherswouldmakethetimetotakeadvantageoftheseopportunitiesweremixed,andalsovariedbylocation.IntheTatlaLakemeeting,mostranchersvoicedthatforafewkeyareas,spendingthetimetoreducefuelswouldbeahighpriority,eventhoughmostfelt
Page 12
7
itwasnoteconomicallyjustified.IntheWilliamsLakemeeting,however,theresponsewasmoremixed–abouthalfwereappreciativeofknowingwhattheiroptionswere,butfeltitwasunlikelythatfuelreductionwouldeverrisetothetopoftheirprioritylist.
Evenwhenweaskedwhetherfueltreatmentactivitieswouldbecomeapriorityiftherancherscouldbepaidfortheirtime,theresponsesweresimilar.Forsome,beingpaidwouldenablethoseactivitiestobecomehighpriorities,butformostoftheranchersinattendance,thelimitingfactorwastimeratherthancompensation.Someparticipantsnotedthathavingconsistentfundingopportunities,ratherthanone-timeopportunities,wouldbetterenablemakingregularprogressonfuelmitigationwork.Inaddition,havingaccesstolargemachineryandotherwaysofreducingtheamountoftimespentthinningfuelswasattractivetosomeparticipants,butwasn’tidentifiedasaprimarybarriertoprioritizingfuelreductions.
TheneedtodisposeofanyfuelsthatarecutfromfenceROWsandfromareasnearranchespointedtoanothersignificantbarrier.Themostcostefficientmethodofdisposingoffuelsispileburning,asdescribedabove.Ifdonepoorly,however,burningdebriscanleadtoescapedfiresandlargescaledamage.Thereareclearregulationsforwhenburningisaviableoption(seeappendices,section5.2),buttheconsequencesofcausingdamageareseriousenoughthatmanyrancherssaidtheywouldnotengageinfuelreductionpracticesbecauseofthefearofbeingheldliablefromstartingafire.Severalpossiblewaysofreducingtheriskofliabilitycameupfordiscussion,mostnotablyincludingtemplatesfordocumentingandrecordingduediligenceonthepartoftherancherstofullyextinguishpileburnlocations.
4 EmergencyplanningforranchesintheCariboo
Evenwiththebestmitigationactions,theriskofwildfirecannotbefullyeliminated.Therefore,planningforemergenciesisacriticalpartofreducingtheimpactofwildfiresoverthelongterm.Inaddition,allofourranch-levelassessmentsshowedthatbecausetheranchareasgenerallyconformtoFireSmartguidelines,theriskofdirectwildfireimpactsontheranchheadquartersisrelativelylow,whiletheconsequenceisextremelyhigh.Accordingtofigure1,themostappropriatemanagementactionundertheseconditionsisemergencyplanning.
4.1 Opportunities
Followingthedevastating2003fireseason,areviewofBritishColumbia’sresponsetointerfacefireswasestablishedbytheprovincialgovernmentandcarriedoutbythehonourableGaryFilmon.ThisreviewfoundthatBCcoulddomoretobebetterpreparedforwildfireemergencies(OfficeoftheAuditorGeneral,2005).Firefightersoftendonothavetheresourcestoprotecteverystructureindangerofanoncomingwildlandfire.Homeownersmust,therefore,planonprotectingthemselves.InadditiontoincreasingawarenessthroughtheFireSmartinitiative,theFilmonReviewrecommendedthathomeownersinvestin“methodsofself-protectionsuchassprinklersassoonaspossible(Filmon,2004).”
In2004,theUnionofB.C.MunicipalitiesacquiredprovincialfundingandtechnicaladvicefromtheOfficeoftheFireCommissioner(OFC)andtheBCWildfireService(BCWS)todevelopandassembleSprinklerProtectionUnits(SPUs)(Merson,2006).TheseSPUsaretrailerscontainingthecomponentstoinstallsprinklerstostructuresatriskfrominterfacefires.TheSPUsare
Page 13
8
ownedbytheUBCM,storedandmaintainedbytheBCWS,whiledeployment,training,andpubliceducationaremanagedbytheOFC.Deploymentistriagedtothestructuresthataremostvulnerabletoapproachingfires(Merson,2006).
Figure3.Exampleofasprinklerusedonarooftoptoprotectthebuildingfromembershowers.Photocredit:SmallFarmServices,Australia.
AccordingtotheOFC,settingupstructuralsprinklersistheeasieststepinmakingapropertyFireSmartandisover90%effectiveinsavingstructuresfromwildfire(Ree,2016).Thesprinklermethodworksbywettingsurfacesandslowingtheadvanceoffiresbycreatingahumiditydomearoundthestructureandproperty.Moistureintheairisincreasedintheimmediatearea,loweringtheambienttemperaturesufficientlybelowtheignitiontemperatureofembershowersfromnearbyfires.Thelikelihoodofcombustiblesignitingisalsodecreased(Ree,2016).
TheOFCrecommendsaminimumwettingtimeoftwohourspriortothefirereachingthepropertyforfullsaturationandeffectiveness(Ree,2016).Toreducesetuptime,smallercomponentssuchassprinklers,mounts,andbracketscanbeputinplaceatthebeginningofthefireseason,orleftpermanentlyinstalled.Withthesmallercomponentsinplace,hosesandpumpswillbelaidoutandconnected(Figure1)(Swart,2016).Dependingonthepump,a3000gallonbladderwilltakeabouttenminutestofill.Thesprinklersshouldnotbeturnedonuntilnecessaryastheremaybeashortageofwaterinthearea(BCWildfireService,2009).AlistofcomponentsandspecificationsisgiveninTables1and2,intheAppendix(Section7.3).
Page 14
9
Figure4.Aschematicofcomponentsandgenerallayoutforasprinklerunitsetuponaruralproperty.Structuresarerepresentedinthefigurebyblackrectangles.(Swart,2016).Generators
Lossofpowerisacommonproblemduringaninterfacefire.Abackupgeneratorisnecessarytomaintainawatersupplyfromsourcesthatrelyonelectricpumps.Availablepowercanalsoaidinfirefightingefforts,aswellasforpostrecovery.
Anelectriciancanassessapropertytocalculateitsessentialloadintheeventofapowerfailure.Generally,atypicalhomewillrequirea10kWgeneratortopoweressentialssuchaslights,refrigerators,securitysystems,andcommunicationsforseveraldays.Largergeneratorsfrom20to25kWcangenerallyrestorefullpowertoahouseholdforseveraldays(Poetker,R.,2016).
Standbygeneratorsarepermanentlyinstalledonthepropertyandconnecteddirectlytotheelectricalpanel.Theycanrunonnaturalgas,diesel,orpropane(Poetker,L.,2016,seetable3intheAppendix,section7.3).Naturalgasisthemosteconomicalfuelsupplyforgeneratorsunder40kWandalsomoreconvenientasthegasispipedinbeneaththeground.Anassessmentwillberequiredtodeterminewhethernaturalgasisavailableontheproperty.Dieselandpropanerequireanexternaltankwhichmustberefilled(Poetker,R.,2016).Portablegeneratorsthatrunongasolinegenerallyprovidesmallerwattagesandarelessdependablebecauseoftheirsmallerfuelreserves.
Page 15
10
4.2 Barriers
CostwasidentifiedasabarriertoassemblingSPUsasoutlinedintable1(section7.3)formanyindividualranches.However,alloftheworkshopsparticipantsfeltthatthecostofcollectivelyowningresourceslikethis,potentiallythroughlocalcattlemen’sassociations,loweredthecostbarrier.Forsomeindividualranchesthatareparticularlyremoteorwhoseassetsareparticularlydistributedoveralargearea,however,owningasprinklerprotectionkitmightbeworththecost,becauseitmightnotbepossibletodeliverasprinklerkitinanemergency.
Amuchlargerbarrieridentifiedintheworkshopisthelogisticalcoordinationrequiredtooperatesharedemergencyresponseresources.Thereareseveralkeyconsiderationsrelatedtomanagementandoperationthatareimportanttounderstandbeforepurchasingasetofsprinklerkits.Mostimportantly,identifyingwhoisresponsibleformaintainingthekitsandwhatregularmaintenanceisrequired,establishingaprogramtotrainpeopletosetupandusethekitsproperly,anddevelopingasetofoperatingproceduresthatdictatewheretheyarekeptandhowtheyaremobilizedinanemergency.Participantsattheworkshopsdifferedintheirresponsetothedegreetowhichtheseweresurmountable.
AttheTatlaLakemeeting,wheremanyoftheparticipantsareactivelyinvolvedinthecommunitySearchandRescuegroupandalsoregularlyworkonorinsupportoffirecrewsduringthefireseason,workshopparticipantsfeltthatthesebarrierswereimportantbutnotinsurmountable,asmanypeopleinthatcommunityhaveexperiencewithsimilaroperationprocedures.AttheWilliamsLakemeeting,however,manypeoplefeltthatcoordinatingtheuseofsprinklerkitsintheeasternendoftheregionwouldbeparticularlydifficultbecauseofthehighernumberofranches,andbecausethoseranchesarenotasoftendistributedalongmajorhighwaysasinthewesternendoftheregion.
5 Conclusionsandnextsteps
Basedontheresultsofourwork,weareconfidentthatthetworiskmanagementapproachesthatwillprovidethegreatestpotentialforreducingwildfireimpacttotheranchingcommunityintheCariboo-ChilcotinRegionare(1)activefuelreductiontreatmentsinkeyhigh-valueareas,and(2)emergencyplanninginitiativesthatfillgapsintheranchingcommunity’sabilitytoprotectthemselves.Theworkshopsdididentifybarrierstotheimplementationofactionstoaddressthesestrategies,butwebelievethattheyare,inlargepart,surmountable.
Theneedforfinancialincentivestoallowrancherstomakefuelmanagementapriorityisfairlyclear.Withoutfinancialincentivesthatprovidethemwiththeflexibilitytodotheworkthemselvesortohireothers,ranchersasagroupareunlikelytomakeprogresstowardreducingfuelloadingacrosstheirranges.However,evenifthesesortsofincentiveswereavailable,rancherswouldalsobenefitgreatlyfromhelptodevelopdetailedfueltreatmentprescriptionsthatmakesmartuseoftheavailablepolicyoptions.Ifdoneatonetimeacrossmanyranches,theseprescriptionscouldpotentiallyprovidesomelandscapelevelprotectionthroughthedevelopmentoffirebreaksatcriticalpointsinthelandscape,whichwouldprovideadditionalbenefitaswell.
Page 16
11
Thoughfundingsourcestoassistwiththecostofsprinklerprotectionunitsmightlowerthebarriertocattlemen’sassociations,technicalandfinancialsupporttoaidthedevelopmentofdetailedoperatingprocedureswouldalsoprovehelpfulforanyorganizationthatownsandmanagestheSPUs.ThesesortsofguidelinesandproceduresarecriticalforensuringthattheSPUsgetusedproperly,andwell-executedplanningdocumentsoftenfallthroughthecracks.
Page 17
12
6 ReferencesFilmon,G.Firestorm2003ProvincialReview.February15,2004.Retrievedfrom
http://bcwildfire.ca/history/reportsandreviews/2003/firestormreport.pdf.April8,2016.
BCWildfireService.FireSmartHomeowner’sManual.2009.Retrievedfromhttp://bcwildfire.ca/prevention/docs/homeowner-firesmart.pdf.April7,2016
Merson,Joanna.HistoricalTrends,CurrentPracticesandOptionsfortheFuture.UnionofBCMunicipalities/UniversityofVictoriaResearchCo-op,March2006.Retrievedfromhttp://www.ubcm.ca/assets/Services~and~Awards/Documents/sprinkler-protection-program-report.pdf,March9,2016
OfficeoftheAuditorGeneralofBritishColumbia.JointFollow-upof2001/2002:Report1ManagingInterfaceFireRisksandFirestorm2003ProvincialReview.LibraryandArchivesCanadaCataloguinginPublicationData,May2005.Retrievedfromhttps://www.bcauditor.com/sites/default/files/publications/2005/report2/report/managing-interface-fire-risks-and-firestorm-2003-provincial-review.pdf,April8,2016.
PersonalCommunications:
Cowling,Randy.PresidentofW.A.S.P.RemoteSprinklerProtection.March10,2016.Telephone correspondence.
Ingram,Jocelyn.InsidesalesatSEIIndustries.April7,2016.Emailcorrespondence.
Poetker,Linda.DirectorofBlueCrestElectricLtd.Abbotsford.April12,2016.Telephone correspondence.
Poetker,Ray.PresidentofBlueCrestElectricLtd.Abbotsford.April12,2016.Telephonecorrespondence.
Ree,Terrance.FireServiceAdvisor.OfficeoftheFireCommissioner,NorthernRegion.March9,2016. Telephonecorrespondence.
Roach,Albert.OwnerofRoachFireServices.March9,2016.Telephonecorrespondence.
Swart,Bob.PresidentofFireStormEnterprises.April7,2016.Emailandphonecorrespondence.
Page 18
13
7 Appendices
7.1 RegulationsonPileBurning
InBritishColumbia,theWildfireActandRegulationspecifiesthelegalobligationswhenusingfirein,orwithinonekilometerof,forestlandorgrassland.MoredetailedregulationsforopenfirescanbefoundintheFNLRO“IndustrialandResourceManagementBurningBrochure”(2014).
Category2openfireisafirethat:
• Burnsmaterialinonepilenotexceeding2m.inheightand3m.inwidth;or,• Burnsmaterialconcurrentlyin2pileseachnotexceeding2m.inheightand3metresin
width;or• Burnsstubbleorgrassoveranareathatdoesnotexceed0.2ha,• Isnotacampfire.
AburnregistrationisnumberisnotrequiredforCategory2openfire.
Category3openfireisdefinedasafirethatburns:
• Materialin3ormorepiles,eachnotexceeding2minheightand3minwidth,• Materialin1ormorepileseachexceeding2minheightand3minwidth,• Oneormorewindrows,or• Stubbleorgrassoveranareaexceeding0.2hectares.
Category3openburnsrequireaburnregistrationnumber,obtainedbyphoningtheMinistry(1-888-797-1717).AnyonethatundertakesburningofaCategory3openfiremustcomplywiththeEnvironmentalManagementActandOpenBurningSmokeControlRegulation(OBSCR).Thisrequiresindividualstochecklocalventingconditionspriortoignitionandtoensurethatnoairqualityburningbansareinplace.Moredetails:www.env.gov.bc.ca/air/airregs.html.
TheOBSCRprohibitsburningwithin150mofanoccupiedstructure(ifforcedairtechnologyisused,or500mwithout),andwithin500mofaschoolgrounds,hospitalsandcontinuingcarefacilities(ifforcedairisused,otherwise2kmifnot).
Openfiresforrangeimprovementareconsidered‘resourcemanagementopenfires’(seeabove)undertheWildfireAct.
Aresourcemanagementopenfireis:
• Burningunpiledslashoveranareaofanysize• Isnotacampfire,Category2or3openfire,andislit,fuelledorusedforsilviculture
treatment,foresthealthmanagement,wildlifehabitatenhancement,ecologicalrestorationorrangeimprovement.
Category3andresourcemanagementopenfirescanonlybelitandfuelledif:
Page 19
14
• Therearenootherrestrictionsinplacefordoingso;• Doingsois,andwillcontinuetobe,safe;• Thepersonsubmitsaburnplantoanofficialandreceivestheofficial’sapprovaltoitin
writing;• Thepersonobtainsaburnregistrationnumberforthefire;• Thepersontakesallthenecessaryprecautionstoensurethefireiscontainedintheburn
area.
Itislargelyuptothecontractortoensurecompliancewithallregulations;however,theprescriptionwritercanplacecertainrestrictionsonthemtosafeguardsomeaspectsoftheburn.Forexample,maximumpilesizecanbewrittenintotheprescription.
7.2 ConsequencesofviolatingcuttingpermitsorWildfireActprovisions
AdministrativePenalties(FRPAAdministrativeOrdersandRemediesRegulation):
Part3,Division2,Section13-Unauthorizedforestorrangeactivities:
Section13(2):
• Themaximumamountthattheministermaylevyagainstapersonundersection71(2)ofFRPAforcontraventionofsection52(1)or(3)isthegreatestofthefollowingamounts:
o Anamountequaltotheproductof§ Thevolume(inm3)oftheCrowntimbersubjecttocontravention,and§ $200perm3
o Anamountequaltotheproductof§ Thearea,expressedinhectares,thatcontainedthetimbersubjectto
thecontravention,and§ $100,000perHa
o Anamountequaltothesumof§ Thestumpageandbonusbidthatintheopinionoftheministerwould
havebeenpayableifthevolumeoftimbersubjecttothecontraventionhadbeensoldunderaBCtimbersalesagreementatthetimeofcontravention
§ Twicethemarketvalueoflogsandspecialforestproductsthatintheopinionoftheministerwere,orcouldhavebeen,producedfromthetimberthatwassubjecttothecontravention
§ Thecoststhathavebeenorwillbeincurredbythegovernmentinre-establishingafreegrowingstandonthearea,and
Page 20
15
§ Thecoststhatwereincurredbythegovernmentforsilviculturetreatmentstotheareathatwererenderedineffectivebecauseofthecontravention
TheWildfireActputstheonusonthepersonmanagingandthosepeopleinvolvedintheburningtreatment.Thisrequiresthattheseindividualsdetermineifburningisasafedecisiononthatdayandtimeandthatreasonableprecautionsaretakentoensurethatthefireiscontainedatalltimes.TheWildfireActappliesonbothCrownandprivatelandinBC.
Herearesomeguidelinestakenfrom“IndustrialandResourceManagementBurningBrochure”(2014):
• CheckwithFLNROforbansorrestrictionsonopenburning.Theseareputintoplacewhentheforestisdryandthedangeroffireincreases.ChecktheMinistrywebsite:www.BCwildfire.caorphoneFireInformationlineat1-888-336-7378.
• Checktheforecastandwindconditions.Ifthewindisstrongenoughtocarrysparkstoothercombustiblematerial,donotburn.
• WhenconductingaResourceManagementBurnonemustensurethatallobligationsspecifiedintheBurnPlanaremet,includingresourcesrequiredonignitionandintheeventofanescape.
Underthelaw,youmustwatchthefiretopreventescape.Ifanescapeoccurs,thepersonresponsibleforthefiremustbeequippedwithatleastonefirefightinghandtooltocontrolandextinguishthefire.Ifthefiregetsoutofcontrol,trytoextinguishthefireandreporttheescapedfortoFLNROor911orfireemergencyinBC(1-800-663-5555OR*5555onacellphone).Continuefightingthefireinasafemanneruntilrelievedbyanofficial.
Finally,youmustextinguishthefirebeforetheleavingthearea.Ensurethatashesarecoldtothetouch.ACategory3openfiremustbeextinguishedinadherencetotherequirementsoftheburnregistrationnumber.
CarelessorimproperlyconductedopenburningcostsBCinexcessof3milliondollarsannually.
ContraventionoftheWildfireActisanoffence.ApersonwhocontravenestheWildfireActmaybeliableforanadministrativepenalty,afineuponconviction,and/orfirefightingandrehabilitationcostsasspecifiedintheWildfireAct.TheWildfireActappliesonbothprivateandCrownlandthroughoutBC.
Offences/Penalties(WildfireAct,S.43):
• Intentionally/recklesslycausingdamagetocrownforestlandorgrasslandincontraventionofSection6(1)–liableonconvictiontofineupto$1millionand/orimprisonmentupto3years
• Startingfirewithin1kmofforestlandorgrasslandwithoutprescription-liableonconvictiontofineupto$500,000and/orupto2yearsimprisonment
Page 21
16
• Failuretoabatefirehazardinprescribedperiodoftimetoprescribedextent–liableonconvictionforfineupto$100,000and/orupto1yearimprisonment
• Failuretoreportfire/takeappropriateactionstoextinguishfire–liableonconvictionforfineupto$5,000and/orimprisonmentupto6months
AdministrativePenaltiesandcostrecovery(WildfireActS.27):
IfMinisterdeterminescontraventionhasoccurred,theministermay:
• Levyanadministrativepenaltyagainstthepersoninanamountnotexceedingtheprescribedamount,
• Determinetheamountofthegovernment’scostoffirecontrolundersection9forafirethatresulted,directlyorindirectly,fromthecontravention
• Maydeterminetheamountthatisequaltothedollarvalueofanyo Crowntimber,o Otherforestlandresources,o Grasslandresources,ando Otherproperty.
Ofthegovernmentdamagedordestroyedasaresult,indirectlyordirectly,ofthecontravention.
• Maydeterminethecostso Thathavebeenorwillbeincurredbythegovernmentinre-establishingafree
growingstandasadirectorindirectresultofthecontravention,ando Thathavebeenincurredbythegovernmentforsilviculturetreatmentsthatwere
renderedineffectiveasadirectorindirectresultofthecontravention• Mayrequirethepersontopaytheamountsdeterminedandthecostsdetermined(see
above),subjecttoprescribedlimits,ifany
RemediationOrders(WildfireAct,S.28)
IftheMinisterdeterminesthatapersonhascontravenedaprovisionofthisActortheregulations,theMinistermayorderthepersontodowork,attheperson’sownexpensethatisreasonablynecessarytoremedythecontraventionandtorepairanydamagecausedbythecontravention
Liabilityofemployers,directorsandofficers(WildfireAct,S.30)
• Ifaperson’scontractor,employeeoragentcontravenesaprovisionofthisActortheregulationsinthecourseofcarryingoutthecontract,employmentoragency,thepersonalsocontravenestheprovision
Page 22
17
• IfacorporationcontravenesaprovisionofthisActortheregulations,adirectororofficerofthecorporationwhoauthorized,permittedoracquiescedinthecontraventionalsocontravenestheprovision.
7.3 Additionalsprinklerkitspecifications:
Table2.Estimateofsprinklerunitcosts(Swart,2016)
No. COMPONENT PRICEEst.($)
Quantityfor1Property
CostperProperty
($)
CostperTrailer(3Properties)
($)1 sprinkler 175 10 1750 52502 hose3/4"x50' 60 5 300 9003 hose3/4"x30' 40 5 200 6004 waterthief 35 10 350 10505 gatedwye3/4" 15 4 60 1806 couplings3/4" 15 4 60 1807 conduitclamps3/8" 5 16 80 2408 3000gal.waterbladder 3500 1 3500 105009 pump 4900 2 9800 2940010 relayhose11/2"x100' 165 42 6930 2079011 3-waywye 75 1 75 22512 trailer 2150 - - 2150 TOTAL - $23,105 $71,465Table3.Sprinklercomponentspecifications(Swart,2016)
No. COMPONENTSPECIFICATIONS1 1.0"sprinklerbrassimpact,w/dualsteelstepspike,¾”GHT*2 3/4"x50'synthetichose(300psi)w/GHTcouplings3 3/4"x30'synthetichose(300psi)w/GHTcouplings4 1-1/2"NPSH*waterthief,QC*w/¾”GHTshutoff5 3/4"gatedwyeGHTcouplings6 3/4"doublefemaleGHTcouplings7 3/8”conduitclamps8 3000gallonUSbladderw/couplingstoconnectpumptobottom9 Mark3firepumps10 1-1/2”x100’forestryhoseweepingQC11 1-1/2"NPSHthreewaygatedwye,QC12 Enclosedutilitytrailerforcomponentstorageandtransport=averagepriceof10used
trailers
Page 23
18
*Threaddefinition:NPSH(NationalPipeStraightHose),GHT(GardenhoseThread),QC(forestryquarterturn/quickcoupling)Table4.Examplesofstandbygeneratorunitprices,comparingKohler,Briggs&Stratton,andCumminsbrands.
StandbyGenerator Cost(CAD$)
Output(kW) Kohler Briggs&Stratton Cummins
10-12 4014 3270 -13-20 4161 4999 484121-25 13533 11026 12048
*Thesearebaseprices,notincludingtaxes,installation,andtransferswitches(totransferpowerfromthegeneratorinsteadoftheutilitysource,~$500)