Hiawatha CARE Project Community Environmental Workgroup Meeting #10 Date: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 9:00 am to 11:00 am Location: Minnehaha Communion Lutheran Church 4101 37 th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55406 CARE Project Objectives – Winter 2012 Community receives information on risks identified in CARE process CEW / Planning Team finalizes prioritization of issues Community / CEW identifies programs / actions to address top concerns Engagement activities are corridor‐wide and reach target populations Agenda 9:00 Objectives and Introductions Review current project objectives 9:10 Review Community Risk Ranking Results Handout: Risk Ranking Results 9:20 Risk Definition Exercise Identify specific risks, opportunities, and relationships between top risks: 10:00 CEW Tie Ins Identify roles that CEW members can have in addressing top issues 10:20 Potential Partners Identify partners to bring in to work on those top issues. 10:50 Next Steps 11:00 Adjourn
15
Embed
CARE Community Environmental Workgroup Meeting #10hennepin.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/121912-… · 12.19.12 CEW Meeting Notes Hiawatha CARE Project Community Environmental
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Hiawatha CARE Project Community Environmental Workgroup Meeting #10 Date: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 9:00 am to 11:00 am Location: Minnehaha Communion Lutheran Church 4101 37th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55406 CARE Project Objectives – Winter 2012
Community receives information on risks identified in CARE process
CEW / Planning Team finalizes prioritization of issues
Community / CEW identifies programs / actions to address top concerns
Engagement activities are corridor‐wide and reach target populations Agenda 9:00 Objectives and Introductions Review current project objectives 9:10 Review Community Risk Ranking Results
Handout: Risk Ranking Results
9:20 Risk Definition Exercise Identify specific risks, opportunities, and relationships between top risks: 10:00 CEW Tie Ins Identify roles that CEW members can have in addressing top issues 10:20 Potential Partners Identify partners to bring in to work on those top issues. 10:50 Next Steps 11:00 Adjourn
12.19.12 CEW Meeting Notes
Hiawatha CARE Project Community Environmental Workgroup Meeting #10 Meeting Notes Date: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 ‐ 9:00 am to 11:00 am Location: Minnehaha Communion Lutheran Church 4101 37th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55406 CARE Project Objectives – Winter 2012
Community receives information on risks identified in CARE process
CEW / Planning Team finalizes prioritization of issues
Community / CEW identifies programs / actions to address top concerns
Engagement activities are corridor‐wide and reach target populations I. Introductions ‐ Attendees
Jon Hunter – American Lung Association of Minnesota
Kirsten Saylor – Gardening Matters
Robb Luckow – Hennepin County Community Works
Ruth Romano – Longfellow Business Association
Joanna Solotaroff – Longfellow Community Council
Mallory Anderson – Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
Jessica Nelson – Minnesota Department of Health
Kevin McDonald – Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Aisha Gomez – Women’s Environmental Initiative
Suyapa Miranda – Women’s Environmental Initiative II. Project Update The Hennepin County Board has approved the contract extension with the US EPA, extending the grant‐funded portion of the project through September 30, 2013. Project staff reviewed the project timeline [Attachment A]. Fourteen of 19 tasks have been completed, with one more completed at the end of the meeting. The final tasks include the prioritization process and action plan. III. Community Risk Ranking Results The project team reviewed two recent focus groups held with (1) the Little Earth Residents Association and with (2) Somali youth. The results from these groups were added to the other results for the final risk ranking analysis. The project team presented an analysis of the results of the risk ranking process ‐‐ see Attachment B for an updated version of this analysis. The overall ranking were calculated by weighting the risk ranking activities such that the focus groups equaled 40% of the
12.19.12 CEW Meeting Notes
total, the door‐to‐door ratings equaled 40%, the community events equaled 10%, and the CEW ratings 10%. The focus groups and door‐to‐door ratings were weighted more heavily because (1) the ratings process in these venues was more rigorous and (2) all participants were from the project area. The ratings for the two neighborhoods were calculated so that the focus groups equaled 50% of the total, the door‐to‐door ratings equaled 45%, and the events 5% of the total score. As the attachment shows, nutrition and obesity, air pollution, economic instability, vehicle pollution, and health disparities rated the highest priority risks through the risk process. These same five risks also rated in the top 7 for both neighborhoods. In addition, there were two issues that rated highly in each neighborhood: asthma rated fourth in East Phillips, while ranking 19th in Longfellow; water quality ranked fourth in Longfellow, while ranking 16th in East Phillips. Upon reflecting on the results, project staff recommended that the CEW move five issues ahead for prioritization and further discussion: nutrition and obesity, air pollution/vehicle emissions (combined), economic instability, asthma, and water quality. Staff also recommended that health disparities and environmental sustainability become overarching values which any CARE project, regardless of the specific issue, needs to be addressed. IV. Risk Definition and Tie Ins / Project Partners The project team facilitated an effort to flesh out these five risks to help move forward on identify specific issues and potential projects / programs to address those issues. The CEW brainstormed responses to four questions for each risk – results of this brainstorm are included in Attachment C. A. What are the specific issues related to Asthma / Air Pollution / etc.? B. How are each of these issues interrelated? How are each of these issues related to health disparities and environmental
sustainability? C. What can we (CEW) do to address Asthma / Air Pollution / etc.? How can your work
support our efforts? D. What other partners can we bring in to help us address Asthma / Air Pollution /
etc.? Adjourn
PWU099
Typewritten Text
CARE PROJECT TIMELINE
TASK Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
Task 1: Convene collaborator's meeting to develop Community Environmental Workgroup (CEW) xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
Task 2: Facilitate kick off meeting with CEW to discuss partnership and process / EPA provide technical assistance for meeting
xxxxxx xxxxxx
Task 3: Hold meeting with CEW, LCC, WEI to share existing risk data, develop community engagement plan xxxxxx xxxxxx
Task 4: Submit quarterly reports and final reporting to EPA 20 20 19 18 20 18 20 20 20 20 20
Task 5: Work with LCC and WEI to begin implementing community engagement plan xxxxxx xxxxxx
Task 6: Facilitate community meetings to understand concerns, assets and vulnerabilities - DEVELOP FINDINGS SUMMARY
xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx M C
CA
RE
5 Task 7: Work with CEW to collect all existing cumulative environmental health data on all risks, identify information gaps - DEVELOP FACT SHEETS
xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx M
Task 8: Identify and map presence of environmental risks, EPA provide technical assistance - DEVELOP MAPS
xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx M
Task 9: [EPA] collect cumulative environmental health data on all environmental risks xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
Task 10: Continue community engagement to talk about environmental and health risk xxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
Task 11: Report back to CEW on learnings from community meetings xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
Task 12: Submit Data Report to EPAM
Task 13: Work with CEW, with technical assistance from EPA, to identify methodology for risk screening and prioritization -- Risk 101
xxxxx
Task 14: Facilitate community engagement to rank environmental risks - Concurrent with Task 17 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
Task 15: Report back to CEW on risk assessment results - identify information needs for next meeting xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
Task 16: Submit Risk Ranking methodology and associated document to EPA M
CA
RE
8 Task 17: Work with community to rank and identify priority risks - DEVELOP SUMMARY OF PRIORITIES xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx M
Task 18: Develop final Action Plan document to address prioritized risks xxxxxx xxxxxx M
Task 19: Submit final action plan to EPAxxxxxx M
M = Milestone
2013
November 15, 2012
2011
CA
RE
1C
AR
E 2-
4C
AR
E 6
CA
RE
7C
AR
E 9
RO
AD
MA
P ST
EP2012
PWU099
Typewritten Text
Attachment A
HIAWATHA CARE PROJECT – COMMUNITY RISK ASSESSMENTAverage ranking arrived by attendees at focus groups; through door‐to‐door canvassing,
at community events, and via CEW evaluation.
Overall Rank (1 to 5 scale)
East Phillips Rank (1 to 5 scale)
Longfellow Rank (1 to 5 scale)
1 Nutrition and obesity 4.00 Nutrition and obesity 4.10 Air pollution 4.13
2 Air pollution 3.99 Air pollution 3.92 Economic instability 4.13
3 Economic instability 3.98 Health disparities 3.86 Pollution from vehicles 4.02
4 Pollution from vehicles 3.78 Asthma 3.82 Water quality 3.96
5 Health disparities 3.76 Economic instability 3.80 Nutrition and obesity 3.94
6 Access to healthy food 3.63 Access to healthy food 3.67 Environmental sustainability
3.76
7 Environmental sustainability
3.57 Pollution from vehicles 3.64 Health disparities 3.65
16 Bugs and pests 3.21 Water quality 3.12 Soil contamination 3.31
17 Lack of green space 3.06 Mold 3.03 Bugs and pests 3.29
18 Mold 2.98 Lack of green space 3.02 Mold 3.18
19 Toxics in the home 2.85 Toxics in the home 2.73 Asthma 3.14
20 Radon 2.61 Radon 2.71 Radon 2.83
Updated 12.31.12
PWU099
Typewritten Text
Attachment B
12.19.12 CEW Discussion Notes Page 1
Hiawatha CARE Project Community Environmental Workgroup Meeting #10 / December 19, 2012 @ 9:00 am Discussion Notes on Priority Environmental Risks Hiawatha CARE Project Community Risks: Asthma A. What are the issues related to Asthma?
Allergies
Bleach and chemicals in house
Bugs
Cold
Exercise
Mold
Perfumes and scented candles – overuse
Pollution
Smoke
Winter – sufficient heat
Inability to afford “fixes” (hypoallergenic sheets, air purifier, etc)
Heavy cost of managing asthma
Not enough / consistent / access to doctors, medical equipment, and medicine to properly implement an asthma plan
B. How is Asthma Linked to…
Air Pollution
Backyard fires
Industry ‐ criteria pollutants / non criteria pollutants contribute
Particulates and ozone (soot and smog) trigger asthma attacks
Poor air quality days – air pollution can trigger asthma attacks
Ozone ‐ haze in winter from fireplaces
Technical programs to help make vehicles pollute less (training on maintenance) Economic Instability
Access to asthma meds when not insured
Ability to function on job ‐ employability
Living in poor quality housing – insect and pest issues, mold, etc.
Lack of access to healthcare
Not able to manage asthma as well
Asthma attacks are increasing in frequency, resulting in fiscal pressures in already public sector health care safety net (increased premiums and copays for insured)
Environmental Sustainability
Extreme heat events (high ambient air temperatures) can worsen / exacerbate asthma attacks Health disparities
Sizable disparities in asthma prevalence and ER visits by race, ethnicity, neighborhood Nutrition and Obesity
Obesity a risk factor for asthma?
PWU099
Typewritten Text
Attachment C
12.19.12 CEW Discussion Notes Page 2
Asthma may reduce ability / desire to exercise or get physical activity – leading to increased risk of obesity.
Water Quality
Hardscapes – roads and parking lots
Mold, fungi may be associated with increased prevalence of asthma in youth and adults
Precipitation can create wet basements and result in mold
Solution = bike access (maps, knowledge of paths); transit access (is system meeting their needs?)
Too much car habitat – reliance C. What can we (CEW) do to address Asthma? How can your work support our efforts to address
Asthma?
Minneapolis air filter / mattress cover program – pair durable good with education
More education about asthma triggers
Programs to help homeowners identify asthma triggers
Resource list on the web
Safer cleaning product kits
Summer Asthma Camp (ALA) D. What other partners can we bring in to help us address Asthma?
MDH Asthma program
Sustainable Resource Center
12.19.12 CEW Discussion Notes Page 3
Hiawatha CARE Project Community Environmental Workgroup Meeting #10 / December 19, 2012 @ 9:00 am Discussion Notes on Priority Environmental Risks Hiawatha CARE Project Community Risks: Air Pollution A. What are the issues related to Air Pollution?
Asphalt plant
Backyard fires
Cars / buses
Driving everywhere
Good use car practices
Grain elevators
Idling school buses
Ill‐maintained cars
Older cars are more likely to higher pollution emissions rates
Recreational fire burning and woodburning stoves in homes
Safety / crime – is it safe to bike / walk
Stop‐and‐go traffic
Warehouses with idling diesel trucks B. How is Air Pollution linked to…
Asthma
Backyard fires
Industry ‐ criteria pollutants / non criteria pollutants contribute
Particulates and ozone (soot and smog) trigger asthma attacks
Poor air quality days – air pollution can trigger asthma attacks
Ozone ‐ haze in winter from fireplaces
Technical programs to help make vehicles pollute less (training on maintenance) Economic Instability
More likely to have polluting industries sited in neighbhorhood
More likely to have high traffic corridors
Extreme heat events (urban heat island) and increased O3 alerts and particular matter incidents mean more lost work and schooling, premature illness and disease – leads to economic instability
More sick days and lost work / more days kids out of school, more doctor visits and urgent care, and negative impacts on employment
Urban forests are weaker in low income neighborhoods. Environmental Sustainability
Vehicle efficiency vs. expense Health disparities
Asthma – prevalence
Minnesota’s busiest highway segment is 35/94 corridor near Phillips
SHIP program encouraging active living which reduces air pollution and VMTs
12.19.12 CEW Discussion Notes Page 4
Siting of polluting facilities more likely in lower income communities Nutrition and Obesity
Not wanting to be outside and exercising
Driving cars
Air pollution from mobile sources (unwalkable, bike‐unfriendly neighborhoods) can contribute to lack of exercise and result in increased risk of obesity
Water Quality
Hardscapes – roads and parking lots
Too much car habitat – reliance
Solution = bike access (maps, knowledge of paths); transit access (is system meeting their needs?)
C. What can we (CEW) do to address Air Pollution? How can your work support our efforts to
address Air Pollution?
Alternative fueled vehicle / electric vehicle programs
Bike rickshaws
Car sharing / ride sharing
Cash for clunkers
Cheap / free bike sharing program
City Council discussion on recreational burning
Clean Air Dialogues recommendations
Hiawatha signal timing project
More trees – trees shading walking / biking parkways and sidewalks
Practical tips to reduce car trips
Reduce car trips, promote sustainable development so more commercial nodes
Reduce idling of cars – show what happens when you idle for 2/5/20 minutes
Shopping behavior analysis to find out where people buy things
Training programs to help people clean up their cars D. What other partners can we bring in to help us address Air Pollution?
Bike advocacy groups / Ped advisory groups
Cyclists for Change – St Paul
Grease Pit – other community cycling groups
Minneapolis Park Board ‐ trees
Minneapolis School District – transportation
NiceRide
Sustainable Communities – Met Council
Tomales y Bicicletas
Transit for Livable Communities
12.19.12 CEW Discussion Notes Page 5
Hiawatha CARE Project Community Environmental Workgroup Meeting #10 / December 19, 2012 @ 9:00 am Discussion Notes on Priority Environmental Risks Hiawatha CARE Project Community Risks: Economic Instability A. What are the issues related to Economic Instability?
Despair, crime, safety for recreation, transport to clinics, grocery stores
Good steady jobs with benefits
Green jobs
Can’t develop a routine/lifestyle because busy piecing together work or dealing with consequences or economic instability
Lack of education and meaningful work
Lack of education about handling personal finances
Neighborhood blight
Stress, despair, trauma, bummertown B. How is Economic Instability linked to…
Air Pollution
More likely to have polluting industries sited in neighborhood
More likely to have high traffic corridors
Extreme heat events (urban heat island) and increased O3 alerts and particular matter incidents mean more lost work and schooling, premature illness and disease – leads to economic instability
More sick days and lost work / more days kids out of school, more doctor visits and urgent care, and negative impacts on employment
Urban forests are weaker in low income neighborhoods. Asthma
Access to asthma meds when not insured
Ability to function on job ‐ employability
Living in poor quality housing – insect and pest issues, mold, etc.
Lack of access to healthcare
Not able to manage asthma as well
Asthma attacks are increasing in frequency, resulting in fiscal pressures in already public sector health care safety net (increased premiums and copays for insured)
Environmental Sustainability
Taking environmental and financial shortcuts Health disparities
Few stores carrying healthy food choices
Lack of access to health care – money
Social determinants of health
Stress and increased likelihood for substance abuse Nutrition and Obesity
12.19.12 CEW Discussion Notes Page 6
Inability to grown own food (moving around)
Lack of access to healthy affordable food
No time to cook / exercise – working a lot
Poor nutrition as well as access to healthy food, and the probability of obesity, disproportionately impacts protected classes – minorities and low income families and individuals
Water Quality
Minneapolis charges stormwater utility fee. Minneapolis offers mechanism to reduce stormwater fee. Low income households disproportionately do not implement stormwater BMPs, thus pay higher fees – less disposable income
C. What can we (CEW) do to address Economic Instability? How can your work support our efforts
to address Economic Instability?
Asking businesses to have policies that employ workforce development – CARE support businesses that do that
Job training
Make sure local businesses hire local people
Support programs that help make people functional for employment
Support for development of own businesses
Trees – reduce urban heat island, absorb particulate matter, reduce O3 creation.
Trees are easy entry point for employment and volunteerism. D. What other partners can we bring in to help us address Economic Instability?
Alliance for Metro Sustainability
American Indian Economic Development Corp
AIOIC
HIRED MN
Latino Economic Development Corp
Lutheran Social Services
MCCD p Minneapolis technical assistance program for entrepreneurs
MN Green Corps
NACDI
Summit
U of MN – Dental School
Volunteers of America
Women Venture
YWCA
12.19.12 CEW Discussion Notes Page 7
Hiawatha CARE Project Community Environmental Workgroup Meeting #10 / December 19, 2012 @ 9:00 am Discussion Notes on Priority Environmental Risks Hiawatha CARE Project Community Risks: Nutrition and Obesity A. What are the issues related to Nutrition and Obesity?
Breastfeeding
Convenience culture
Cooking / buying education – how to prepare healthy food we want people to buy
Gardening space for apartment residents
Lack of access to gym‐type places
Lack of access to green space and safe play spaces
Lack of access to outdoor spaces
Lack of awareness of what resources exist
More access to green space
Support implementation of health wellness policies at each school
Hard to get to a big store without transportation – shopping at corner store B. How is Nutrition and Obesity linked to…
Air Pollution
Air pollution from mobile sources (unwalkable, bike‐unfriendly neighborhoods) can contribute to lack of exercise and result in increased risk of obesity
Driving cars
Not wanting to be outside and exercising Asthma
Asthma may reduce ability / desire to exercise or get physical activity – leading to increased risk of obesity.
Obesity a risk factor for asthma? Economic Instability
Inability to grown own food (moving around)
Lack of access to healthy affordable food
No time to cook / exercise – working a lot
12.19.12 CEW Discussion Notes Page 8
Poor nutrition as well as access to healthy food, and the probability of obesity, disproportionately impacts protected classes – minorities and low income families and individuals
Health disparities
Increased likelihood of health problems and lack of access to health care
Heart disease, diabetes, obesity, cholesterol
Low income communities are less walkable, less bikeable, and as a result, community members walk and bike less and get less exercise in normal course of daily activities = risk of obesity
Water Quality
Green infrastructure and green spaces C. What can we (CEW) do to address Nutrition and Obesity? How can your work support our efforts
to address Nutrition and Obesity?
Free Zumba
Gardening – hubs program
MDH – Statewide Health Improvement Program
Minneapolis Homegrown and urban ag efforts
More physical activity in schools D. What other partners can we bring in to help us address Nutrition and Obesity?
Allina Backyard Initiative – Growing the Backyard
HOPE Community
IATP
Indian Health Board
Minneapolis Schools – physical activity and healthy food
Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board
Parent‐teacher organizations
Running Wolf
Sisters Camelot
Tomales y Bicicletas
Waite House
YWCA
12.19.12 CEW Discussion Notes Page 9
Hiawatha CARE Project Community Environmental Workgroup Meeting #10 / December 19, 2012 @ 9:00 am Discussion Notes on Priority Environmental Risks Hiawatha CARE Project Community Risks: Water Quality A. What are the issues related to Water Quality?
Biological diversity of river – eagles, fish, plant communities
Green infrastructure‐ rain gardens, swales, flood zones/overflows
Industrial pollutants flow to river
Oil spills and leaking
Pesticides used on lawns
Pet waste
Poor construction or building practices – soil erosion
Salt on sidewalks
Too much impervious surfaces
Trash and plastic bags
What we apply to our built environment
Ensuring groundwater is being protected and maintenance at sustainable levels
Erosion control rules being enforced – dust and transfer of soil to water
Fishing
Recreation, fishery, wildlife
Safe – is water clean
Sampling programs – more testing B. How is Water Quality linked to…
Air Pollution
Hardscapes – roads and parking lots
Too much car habitat – reliance
Solution = bike access (maps, knowledge of paths); transit access (is system meeting their needs?)
Asthma
Hardscapes – roads and parking lots
Mold, fungi may be associated with increased prevalence of asthma in youth and adults
Precipitation can create wet basements and result in mold
Too much car habitat – reliance Economic Instability
Minneapolis charges stormwater utility fee. Minneapolis offers mechanism to reduce stormwater fee. Low income households disproportionately do not implement stormwater BMPs, thus pay higher fees – less disposable income