A 46-inch diagonal carbon nanotube field emission backlight for liquid crystal display Yong Churl Kim * , Shang Hyeon Park, Chang Soo Lee, Tae Won Chung, Eunseog Cho, Deuk Seok Chung, In Taek Han * Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology, Samsung Materials Research Complex, Youngtong, Suwon, Kyunggi 443-803, Republic of Korea ARTICLE INFO Article history: Received 18 February 2015 Accepted 28 April 2015 Available online 8 May 2015 ABSTRACT A large area carbon nanotube field emission backlight that is built with a new cathode structure is reported. The approach involves unique gate insulator formation by glass etch- ing, highly populated multi wall nanotube tips, and gate electrode assembly by anodic bonding. Impressive lamping performances are noted through dynamic control of the built in fine 4320 local dimming blocks as small as 1 cm 2 . The liquid crystal display lit by the backlight demonstrates superior luminance uniformity 97%, and a native contrast ratio 400,000:1, whilst showing less than 10% decay in emission current of the sealed panel dur- ing continuous operation over 8000 h. Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Exploiting carbon nanotube (CNT) field emitters in cathodolu- minescent devices has widely been demonstrated [1–7], such as field emission display, backlight unit (BLU) for liquid crystal display (LCD), and household lamp. Among the numerous applications of CNTs, these luminescent devices can be the most promising because the commercial market is huge, and the impact is supposed to be very direct to the consumers to experience nanotechnology. CNTs provide the most ideal geometry for field emission, known as great aspect ratio over 1000. In addition, they possess superior chemical stability thanks to strong covalent bonds, leading to more robust and resistant to electromigration under strong electric field than traditional metallic structures. Though CNT emitters have shown their promising properties including extraction of high currents (a few mA per emitter) under such an ideal condition as ultra high vacuum (UHV, <10 8 Torr), the details of time- dependent emission behaviors in the sealed large area devices are strongly affected by emitter distribution and evolution of the internal vacuum condition. Under an extreme condition (10 10 Torr), CNTs can emit electrons sta- bly at even high temperature heated by Joule heating, up to 1600 K. This high temperature stability is sustainable by self-surface cleaning through desorption process [8]. However, such a condition, meaning monolayer formation time 10 4 s at 10 10 Torr, is hardly attainable in the normal consumer electronic devices, where getter materials are used for in-situ pumping. Practically, low 10 5 –10 6 Torr of vacuum is readily available in the getter installed devices. Moreover, sustaining vacuum condition becomes harder in large-area flat panels due to its limited conductance. In an ensemble of CNT arrays that appears in usual cathode structures, the field enhancement factor (b) of the emitters depends on the spacing between neighboring emitters (d) due to the field screening effect. Nilsson et al. [9] showed that the overall b can be maximized at d P 2l, where l is emitter length. Assuming all of the prepared emitters having equal height l =1 lm, the attainable emitter density with minimum field screening is estimated less than 2.5 · 10 7 cm 2 . However, in http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.04.093 0008-6223/Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. * Corresponding authors. E-mail addresses: [email protected](Y.C. Kim), [email protected](I.T. Han). CARBON 91 (2015) 304 – 310 Available at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/carbon
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
bly sustained during operation, measured using an SRG-3
spinning rotor gauge (MKS instrument, USA). To investigate
the surface morphologies and microstructures of the materi-
als, a transmission electron microscope (TEM, H-9000NA,
Hitachi) with an acceleration voltage of 300 kV was used. A
micro-Raman spectrometer (633 nm Ar + laser, Renishaw)
was chosen to examine CNT raw materials.
3. Results and discussion
Highly crystallized multi-wall CNT (MWCNT) produced by arc
discharge process (JFE Engineering Corp., Japan) was selected
for the formulation of emitter paste (see Supporting
Information), having ten to twelve graphitic walls (Fig. 3a).
A very low integrated D (disordered, 1351 cm�1) to G (graphi-
tic, 1588 cm�1) intensity ratio (ID/IG) �0.33 in the Raman scat-
tering data (Fig. 3b) was observed from the raw material
named MW3, which is unusually lower value than the other
comparative MWCNTs (MW1 and MW2) available in the mar-
ket (ID/IG = 0.7–0.9, spectra not shown here). Also much supe-
rior field emission characteristics (I�V, Fig. 3c) were observed
in the highly crystalline MWCNTs. When compared with
available other nanotubes including single, double, and few
(3–5) wall tubes, the chosen MWCNTs provided not only better
field emission performances with low enough turn-on voltage
with no extra purification processes, but also even better tol-
erance against possible damages by tape-activation, mesh-
bonding and high temperature (up to 480 �C) manufacturing
steps, leading to promising reliability in the sealed panels.
Here, I�V measurement for the screening of raw materials
was conducted in a vacuum chamber (1 · 10�6 Torr) under a
diode configuration with a gap 500 lm between the anode
and cathode.
As shortly introduced in the previous section, the anodic
bonding process caused serious damage on the prepared
CNT emitters. Fig. 4a compares Ia�Vg behaviors between
two cathode groups with and without barrier layer, respec-
tively. Also corresponding SEM images as presented in
Fig. 4b clearly show a distribution of CNT emitters mostly
shortened in height during the anodic bonding in the cathode
without barrier layer. Another modification should be noted
in the cathode was based on two unexpected emission behav-
iors. One was temperature dependent Ia�Vg behavior of the
Fig. 3 – (a) TEM images of the MWCNTused in this study. (b) A Raman spectrum showing high degree of crystallization of the
MWCNT (MW3). (c) Comparison of field emission behaviors under diode mode among three different MWCNT pastes. Here,
I�V measurements for each CNT are doubly checked. Inset: a Fowler–Nordheim plot for the I�V of MW3. (A color version of
this figure can be viewed online.)
Fig. 4 – (a) Comparison of the field emission behaviors
between two cathode groups processed with barrier or not.
(b) SEM images showing degradation of the emitters in the
anodic bonding process. (A color version of this figure can be
viewed online.)
Fig. 5 – (a) Strong Ia�Vg dependency on ambient
temperatures of a CNTBLU for which the BLU panel was
operated in a thermostat container. (b) Lamping behaviors
in terms of elapsed time after switching-on in a CNTBLU. (A
color version of this figure can be viewed online.)
C A R B O N 9 1 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 3 0 4 – 3 1 0 307
BLU panel (Fig. 5a). The Ia was increased monotonically from
23.5 mA up to 36.2 mA at the same applied Vg = 135 V with
increase of the panel temperature from 20 �C up to 60 �C, vice
versa. Here, the test was performed in a thermoset container.
The other curious phenomenon was a large delay in the
lamping (Fig. 5b). Delay of tens to hundreds of seconds in
turning-on and -off the backlight was observed irrespective
308 C A R B O N 9 1 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 3 0 4 – 3 1 0
of the tested ambient temperature in the range of 20–60 �C. To
the best knowledge of the authors, neither of these two phe-
nomena have been reported nor expected in the field emis-
sion materials. In principle, field emission is immune to
ambient fluctuations in the wide range of temperature
(�269–450 �C) as originally proposed by Ken Shoulders [13],
and cathodoluminescent phosphors possess quite fast decay
behavior less than a few milliseconds [14]. Among controver-
sies, we speculated that these two eccentric symptoms were
strongly coupled with each other, and probably caused by
charge accumulation on the insulating surfaces exposed near
emitter patterns. In case of surface charging on the insulator
(barrier and/or glass in this case), it can distort normal field
emission behaviors, and even worse induce a delay in switch-
ing induced by slow charge accumulation on and flushing
from insulator surfaces.
To support our conjecture, electric field distributions in the
original and modified cathode structures were simulated
Fig. 6 – (a) Strong electric field developed on the edges of the
old cathode that is fully covered with CNT layer (upper left),
and its magnified emission patterns on the anode (upper
right). Electric field lines developed in the modified cathode
with expanded silver electrode where strong fields are
concentrated on the edges of the silver pattern (lower left),
and its emission patterns on the anode (lower right). Here,
the representation of the vertical direction in the modeling
is somewhat exaggerated on purpose for the clear visibility.
Both of the luminescent images inserted in (a) were taken at
Va = 8 kV and Ia = 25 mA. (b) Invariant Ia�Vg behaviors
against ambient temperatures from the modified cathode
with extended silver electrodes. (A color version of this
figure can be viewed online.)
using a commercial software (OPERA 3D) as shown in
Fig. 6a. A strong electric field was developed on the edges of
the CNT film in the original structure, leading to a possible
charge accumulation mainly on the barrier surface by the
emitted electrons from those CNTs populated even at the pat-
tern edges (see Fig. 2b). Meanwhile, the electric field was
rather concentrated on the edges of the extended cathode
electrode (Ag) in the modified structure, where electron emis-
sion was not expected. Based on this model, we simply
extended the width of the silver layer so as not to be fully cov-
ered by CNT paste (see Fig. S4). Using such a modified cathode
structure, we could stabilize the field emission behaviors
immune to ambient temperature in the dedicated range
(Fig. 6b), and instant response to on–off switching signals.
Though about 20 V of the applied Vg was increased by this
modification (compare I�V plots in Figs. 5a and 6b) owing
to the elimination of edge-assisted emissions, luminance pat-
terns on the anode plate were fairly identical at the same
anode conditions (Va = 8 kV and Ia = 25 mA) as shown parallel
in Fig. 6a.
Fig. 7a demonstrates a uniform luminous image of the
fully sealed 46 inch diagonal CNTBLU with a luminance
6000 cd m�2, for which Vg = 153 V with a duty ratio 1/120
(0.83%) was applied under the conditions of Va = 15 kV and
Ia = 25 mA. Since the other parts of the LCD panel consume
95% of the light output from the backlight, this full-white
luminance 6000 cd m�2 is represented as 300 cd m�2 when
lit LCD-TV. To evaluate the brightness uniformity (BU), nine
groups on the panel were chosen to measure. Each group con-
sisted nine adjacent dimming blocks (3 · 3), and thus the
totally 81 blocks were used for the evaluation using the defini-
tion of BU (%) = (1 � r/m) · 100, where r and m are standard
deviation and mean brightness, respectively [15]. The mea-
sured BU of the CNTBLU shown in Fig. 7a was as high as
93.2% without an additional light diffusion film (97% with a
diffusion film). The reliability of our panel measured for
8500 h is shown in Fig. 7b. The starting Ia (�26 mA) was stably
maintained for over 6000 h, and for the following 2500 h only
2 mA (�7.7% of the initial value) was reduced. Such unusual
emission stability was ascribed mainly to a couple of note-
worthy aspects in our technology. First, highly crystallized
MWCNT was used. Second, totally 25 mA of Ia required for
the full-white mode from the 4320 dimming blocks means
that average current 5.7 lA (peak current 695 lA) is consumed
per dimming block, which yields average 23 lA (peak 2.76 mA)
per cm2 of the printed CNT area (printing coverage � 0.
25 cm2/block). This value is so fairly low emission current
density that can be stably extracted from highly dense CNT
arrays as in our emitters. For the last to add, an optimized
aging process before the panel isolation from the vacuum sys-
tem quite contributed to the stable lifetime. While aging, the
CNTBLU was operated at a constant current mode fixed at
Ia = 25 mA. Within 4 h, an increase of DVg � 25 volts (23 V of
increase in initial 2 h) was observed (inset of Fig. 7b). Thus
our aging process could probably eliminate enough volatile
gaseous species adsorbed on the CNT emitters, grid mesh,
and phosphor particles. Fig. 7c demonstrates a CNTBLU
under local dimming operation and corresponding LCD image
lit by the CNTBLU. About 35% of the area was locally operated
here for the image representation while the other part of the
Fig. 7 – (a) A photograph of a CNTBLU under full-white mode with a luminance 6000 cd m�2. (b) emission current (Ia) behavior
of a sealed 46 inch CNTBLU showing only 7.7% decay after continuous operation of 8500 h. Inset shows Vg stabilization under
constant current operation during aging process. (c) A captured image of a CNTBLU under local dimming operation (left). Note
the grayscale representation of luminance in the backlight image. Corresponding LCD-TV image lit by the CNTBLU (right). (A
color version of this figure can be viewed online.)
C A R B O N 9 1 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 3 0 4 – 3 1 0 309
panel was in off-state. The brightest blocks (an area in the
woolen muffler in the figure) showed luminance 16000 cd m�2
(800 cd m�2 on that of LCD, Lmax). The off-mode brightness
should be virtually zero because the underneath CNTBLU
did not illuminate at all, but the luminance meter (LX-100,
Konica Minolta) indicated its lower limit 0.002 cd m�2 (Lmin).
Thus, the native contrast ratio (Lmax/Lmin) represented by
our CNTBLU was as high as 400,000:1.
4. Conclusions
A 46-inch diagonal CNT field emission BLU that is built with a
new cathode structure is reported. The approach involves
unique gate insulator formation by glass etching, highly pop-
ulated MWCNT tips, and gate electrode assembly by anodic
bonding. Impressive lamping performances are noted
through dynamic control of the built in fine 4320 local dim-
ming blocks as small as 1 cm2. The LCD-TV lit by the backlight
demonstrates superior luminance uniformity 97%, and a
native contrast ratio 400,000:1, whilst showing less than 10%
decay in emission current of the sealed panel during contin-
uous operation over 8000 h. Scaling up of the proposed device
inclusive of cathode and anode are entirely compatible with
the existing processes for large area plasma panel. Though
to commercialize the CNT BLU for TV in mass as major back-
lights, further reducing in manufacturing time and cost
mainly limited by the initial exhausting and ageing steps
are still challenging, we expect that the CNTBLU is a promis-
ing technology in the high performance TVs and monitors
with motion-blur-free (short response time � 5 ms) and high
contrast images.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found,
in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.
2015.04.093.
R E F E R E N C E S
[1] Saito Y, editor. Carbon nanotube and related field emitters:fundamentals and applications. Weinheim,Germany: Wiley-VCH; 2010.
[2] Dijon J, Fournier A, Levis M, Meyer R, Bridoux C, MontmayeulB, et al. 37.5L: Late-News Paper: 600 Colour CNT FEDDemonstrator with High Peak Brightness. SID SymposiumDigest of Technical Papers 2007;38:1313.
[3] Liu P, Wei Y, Liu K, Liu L, Jiang K, Fan S. New-type planar fieldemission display with super aligned carbon nanotube yarnemitter. Nano Lett 2012;12:2391.
[4] Kim YC, Yoo EH. Printed Carbon Nanotube Field Emitters forBacklight Applications. Japan J Appl Phys 2005;44:L454.
[5] Wu HC, Youh MJ, Lin WH, Tseng CL, Juan YM, Chuang MH,et al. Fabrication of double-sided field-emission light sourceusing a mixture of carbon nanotubes and phosphorsandwiched between two electrode layers. Carbon2012;50:4781.
[6] Hao H, Liu P, Tang J, Cai Q, Fan S. Secondary electron emissionin a triode carbon nanotube field emission display and itsinfluence on the image quality. Carbon 2012;50:4203.
[7] Chung KJ, Pu NW, Youh MJ, Liu YM, Ger MD, Cheng K, et al.Improvement of field-emission-lamp characteristics usingnitrogen-doped carbon nanocoils. Diamond Rel Mater2015;53:1.
[8] Purcell ST, Vincent P, Journet C. Measuring the physicalproperties of nanostructures and nanowires by fieldemission. Europhys News 2006;37:26.
[9] Nilsson L, Groening O, Emmenegger C, Kuettel O, Schaller E,Schlapbach L, et al. Scanning field emission from patternedcarbon nanotube films. Appl Phys Lett 2000;76:2071.
[10] Choi YC, Lee JW, Lee SK, Kang MS, Lee CS, Jung KW, et al. Thehigh contrast ratio and fast response time of a liquid crystaldisplay lit by a carbon nanotube field emission backlight unit.Nanotechnology 2008;19:235306.
[11] Schjølberg-Henriksen K, Poppe E, Moe S, Storas P, Taklo MMV,Wang DT, et al. Anodic bonding of glass to aluminium.Microsyst Technol 2006;12:441.
[12] Kahnt H. Ionic transport in glasses. J Non-Cryst Solids1996;203:225.
[13] Shoulders KR. Microelectronics using electron beamactivated machining techniques. Adv Comput 1961;2:135.
[14] Ozawa L. Cathodoluminescence and photoluminescence:theories and practical applications. FL, USA: CRC Press,Taylor & Francis Group; 2007.
[15] Kim YC, Nam JW, Hwang MI, Kim IH, Lee CS, Choi YC, et al.Uniform and stable field emission from printed carbonnanotubes through oxygen trimming. Appl Phys Lett2008;92:263112.