Top Banner
Up to 27% more environment ally friendly than land-based accommodation on comparable deployments* *Based on independent environmental evaluation of Bibby Maritime accommodation versus shore-based
4
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Carbon footprint stats visual

Up to 27% more environmentally friendly than land-based accommodation

on comparable deployments*

*Based on independent environmental evaluation of Bibby Maritime accommodation versus shore-based

Page 2: Carbon footprint stats visual

performing better in terms of CO₂ emissions with more compact constructions

and lower heating and cooling demands compared to

land-based accommodation

Page 3: Carbon footprint stats visual

Floating accommodation requires

minimal site preparation and remediation before and

after deployment,

reducing the CO₂ emitted per year compared to

land-based accommodation.

Page 4: Carbon footprint stats visual

Site PreparationConstructionFit-outUse at deploymentSite remediation

Site PreparationConstructionFit-outUse at deploymentSite remediation

Conventional Village Construction

Modular Construction

Site PreparationConstructionFit-outUse at deploymentSite remediation

Floating Accommodation

Traditional on-site activity

On-site activity

On-site activity

Time savings

Significant time savingsOff-site

Possible Project Time Savings with Floating Accommodation