1 Texas City Attorneys Association South Padre Island – June 10, 2009 Climate Change and its Impacts on Municipal Operations Presented by: Paul G. Gosselink Lloyd Gosselink Rochelle & Townsend, P.C. (512) 322-5806 Jason Tournillon GT Environmental Finance, LLC (512) 342-2711 2 2 Carbon Credits Why should a city consider generating and selling them? Revenue Global Environmental Benefits Positive Public Relations
23
Embed
Carbon Credits - Texas City Attorneys...Austin, Texas 78701 Austin, TX 78701 (512) 322-5806 (512) 342-2711 [email protected][email protected] THE END Climate Change and its
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
Texas City Attorneys AssociationSouth Padre Island – June 10, 2009
Climate Change and its Impactson Municipal Operations
Presented by:
Paul G. GosselinkLloyd Gosselink Rochelle & Townsend, P.C.(512) 322-5806
Jason TournillonGT Environmental Finance, LLC (512) 342-2711
2
2
Carbon Credits
Why should a city consider generating and selling them?
RevenueGlobal Environmental BenefitsPositive Public Relations
2
3
3
Too Good to be True?
Maybe.But chances are good.How good depends on cap and trade.
Will legislation pass?This session?Or be delayed?
Will EPA pass regulation?
4
4
Is Global Warming Real?
Two sides to argument
3
4
7
7
Is Global Warming Real – Does it Matter?
Which scientific view is right – immaterial2 reasons:
Cap and Trade seems inevitableEnough people in U.S. believe already that voluntary markets have formed
Regulated markets exist worldwide
Consider the opportunities
8
8
Kyoto Protocol
U.S. signed original treaty in 1992166 nationsUnited Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
Kyoto – 1997U.S. and KazakhstanObama Administration set to sign
5
9
9
Cap and Trade Legislation
Touted for positive benefitsControl global warmingCreates jobsReduce the budget deficit
Will also create hardshipsCreates opportunities
6
11
11
Opportunity to Sell Environmental Attributes
CommoditiesSold throughout worldGlobal issue – global marketU.S. Regional marketsVolume and Value escalating
7
13
13
Environmental Attributes in Texas
Carbon CreditsRenewable Energy CreditsCompliance PremiumsIn addition
Production Tax CreditsInvestment Tax Credits
14
14
DOE GrantsAbilene $1,131,600Allen $693,000Amarillo $1,781,600Arlington $3,428,100 Austin $7,492,700Baytown $672,300Beaumont $1,104,200 Bedford $201,200Brownsville $1,659,200 Bryan $695,100Carrollton $1,189,100 Cedar Hill $176,600 Cedar Park $519,700 College Station $791,100Conroe $538,300Coppell $171,200
Corpus Christi $2,757,500Dallas $12,787,300Del Rio $156,300Denton $1,117,000DeSoto $187,700Duncanville $148,600Edinburg $683,100El Paso $5,802,700Euless $454,200Flower Mound $607,700Fort Worth $6,738,300Frisco $825,800Galveston $580,100Garland $1,978,800Georgetown $201,900Grand Prairie $1,474,400
8
15
15
DOE GrantsMcAllen $1,292,500McKinney $1,071,500Mesquite $1,200,900Midland $997,700Mission $629,500Missouri City $634,900New Braunfels $498,200North Richland Hills $584,900Odessa $915,100Pasadena $1,358,600Pearland $685,900Pharr $608,900Plano $2,545,400Port Arthur $541,300Richardson $1,036,200Round Rock $955,400
Rowlett $481,900San Angelo $865,000San Antonio $12,897,000San Marcos $498,100Sherman $170,000Sugar Land $781,400Temple $593,200Texarkana $174,300Texas City $191,600The Colony $156,200Tyler $1,005,700Victoria $605,700Waco $1,246,300Wichita Falls $996,100
9
17
17
DOE Grants
Goal to award ALL the grant moneyIf rejected, reapply
Listing of virtually preapproved projects“Reduction and Capture of Methane and Greenhouse generated by landfills or similar waste related sources.”Deadline 6/25
18
18
DOE Grants
If not on list – not to worryState funds$560 million60% must be passed throughEmail alerts – website
10
19
19
What are Carbon Credits, RECs and Compliance Premiums?
See paper for definitions of RECs and Compliance Premium
Carbon credit – created when an emitterReduces his CO2e emissionsVoluntarilyAdditionality
20
20
What are Carbon Credits?
Not just CO2Carbon Equivalent Unit CO2e6 Principal GHG’s in CO2e
CO2 carbon dioxideMH4 methaneN2O nitrous oxideHFC hydroflourocarbonsPFC perflourocarbonsSF6 sulfur hexaflouride
11
21
21
Value of Carbon Credits
Jason will discuss dollar valuesMH4 – 21 xN20 – 300 X
22
22
3 Questions
Who buys these credits?Why?What do they cost?
12
23
23
BuyersGreen MarketingSincere attempts to slow global warmingPre-compliance buyingInvestment
SellersCities are typically sellers of CO2e
24
24
Political and Legal Background
Massachusetts v. EPASupreme Court case that held that GHG are pollutants and may be regulated under FCAA by EPA.Court remanded case to EPA to reconsider the petition for rulemaking.
FCAA requires EPA to prescribe regulations for GHG if it determines that GHG “may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.”
13
25
25
Endangerment Finding
Bush EPA not proceedObama EPA made endangerment finding on 4/17/09Bargaining chip with Congress
Cap and Trade Legislation PreferredEPA now positioned to pass rule
Probable lawsuit
26
26
GHG Reporting Rule
Proposed RuleComments due 6/9, yesterday
85-90% of all GHG emitters1300 sourcesInformation gathering – not regulatoryGoal makes sense
14
27
27
GHG Reporting Rule
Reporting ThresholdsAny facility that emits > 25,000 metric tonnes of GHGsAll manufacturers of motor vehiclesAll suppliers of fossil fuels (refineries, coal plants)Certain other sources – the “all in” sources (for city purposes a relevant source is landfills)
28
28
GHG Reporting Rule
Rigorous requirementsFailure to report – up to $32,500/dayFraudulent report – criminal penaltiesFirst Report due 1/1/11
2010 dataHave to start in 6 months
15
29
29
Cap and Trade Legislation
American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009
Waxman-Markey900 plus pagesPassed House Energy and Commerce Committee in May 2009
30
30
Cap and Trade - “CAP”
Carbon emitters will have limit (cap on the amount of GHG’s they are allowed to emit)
By legislation, orBy EPA rule
Stay at or below or face fines/injunctionsThis gives allowances to emit financial value
16
31
31
Cap and Trade – “Trade”
Emitter that is capped has optionMake physical or operational changes, orTrade (buy) CO2e credits
Because less expensive
Each year allowances are reducedSupply and demandCO2e becomes more valuable
32
32
Cap and Trade – Limits85% of total U.S. GHG emissions
Must reduce 1.25 tonnes of trailed emission for 1.00 tonnes of capped emissions
17
33
33
Cap and Trade – Incentives
Emitter – buying offsets cost less than self reductionSeller – revenue producerEnvironment – fewer GHG emissionsEconomy – more cost effective
34
34
Cap and Trade – ObjectionsPhilosophical/Economic
Cost of power increasesTo suppliersTo consumers
Cap and TaxDetails
Allowance v. AuctionCoal states unemploymentHydroelectric states precludedNot likely to pass as now draftedMay not pass at all
18
35
35
Carbon OffsetsCarbon Offsets (“Carbon Credits”) represent the reduction of one metric tonne (MT) of greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) from the atmosphereCome from projects that either destroy GHGs or prevent their emission in the first placeProjects must be Voluntary and Additional
Voluntary – not mandated by any law or regulationAdditional – beyond business as usual
Credits measured in MTs of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (CO2e) because CO2 is the most prevalent greenhouse gasCan be traded as a commodity
36
36
Types of Projects that Can Create Offsets (Differ by registry)
Landfill Gas CaptureLivestock Methane CaptureAforestation/DeforestationRenewable Energy (wind-solar-biomass)Coal Mine Methane CaptureFuel switching
U.S.Regional Mandatory Programs (RGGI, WCI)Voluntary MarketPending for mandatory federal cap and trade program
38
38
Who Uses Offsets?
Power producers and companies in states that are part of regional mandatory programsCompanies looking to reduce the environmental impact of their operations or prepare for future mandatory programsCompanies voluntarily undertaking “green” marketing initiatives
20
39
39
How Offsets are Created?Identify and implement an eligible projectMonitor project data (QA/QC) over the course of the crediting period (typically a year)Calculate emission reductionsHave project operations and emission reductions calculations verified by an independent third-partySubmit verification results to registry – registry then issues credits
40
40
How are they sold?
OTC versus Exchange market transactionsSelling forwardSelling vintage creditsBanking of credits
Data CollectionLong term relationshipCommodity Market participation
44
44
Why should you consider this?
Possible Regulatory RiskPossible compliance hedgePossible revenue sourceBetter positioned for future project negotiations
23
Paul G. Gosselink Jason TournillonLloyd Gosselink Rochelle & Townsend, P.C. GT Environmental Finance, LLC816 Congress Avenue, Suite 1900 816 Congress Avenue, Suite 1220Austin, Texas 78701 Austin, TX 78701(512) 322-5806 (512) [email protected][email protected]
THE ENDClimate Change and its Impacts on Municipal Operations