0 CapX 2020 2006 CapX 2020 Transmission CapX 2020 Transmission Projects & Planning Projects & Planning Ensuring Reliability Ensuring Reliability U of MN Renewable Energy Workshop October 12, 2006 Terry Grove, P.E, CapX Utilties
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
0CapX 2020 2006
CapX 2020 Transmission CapX 2020 Transmission Projects & PlanningProjects & Planning
Ensuring ReliabilityEnsuring Reliability
U of MN Renewable Energy WorkshopOctober 12, 2006
Terry Grove, P.E, CapX Utilties
1CapX 2020 2006
Today’s topicsToday’s topics
Background & the Initial ProjectsImplementing the ProjectsPlanning for Future
2CapX 2020 2006
CapX 2020: CapX 2020: Capacity Expansion Needed by 2020Capacity Expansion Needed by 2020
Formed Spring 2004 An alliance of 11 electric cooperatives & municipal and investor-owned utilities
Participating utilities- Dairyland Power Cooperative- Great River Energy- Midwest Municipal
Transmission Group- Minnesota Power- Minnkota Power Cooperative- Missouri River Energy Services- Otter Tail Power Company- Rochester Public Utilities- Southern Minnesota
Municipal Power Agency- Wisconsin Public Power
Incorporated- Xcel Energy
3CapX 2020 2006
Historical growth from 2000-2004: 2.64%CapX growth 2009-2020: 2.49%
Customer Use Is GrowingCustomer Use Is Growing
7300.0
8300.0
9300.0
10300.0
11300.0
12300.0
13300.0
14300.0
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
MW
Demand
4CapX 2020 2006
CapX 2020 Utilities Serve Minnesota CapX 2020 Utilities Serve Minnesota and the Regionand the Region
6300 megawatts of load growth in the region through 2020 will require 8000 megawatts of additional generation
5CapX 2020 2006
Rigorous Process Yielded Flexible PlanRigorous Process Yielded Flexible Plan
ProcessModeled three scenariosof where generationfacilities might be developed
Assessed transmission required under eachscenario
Many facilities were common to all three scenarios
Established best sequencefor project groups
Total capital cost for transmission estimated - ~ $3 billion
Project Group 1
System Modeling
6CapX 2020 2006
Initial Vision Study Initial Vision Study -- Need for 345Need for 345--kV Backbone kV Backbone System by 2020System by 2020
7CapX 2020 2006
Outcome Outcome –– Specific Projects & SequenceSpecific Projects & Sequence
2014 to 2020Group 3 – Remote Generation Outlet As needed and generation projects developed
2014 to 2020Group 2 – Around the Twin Cities
New 345 KV transmission loop around the Twin Cities
2011201120122012
Group 1SE Twin Cities-Rochester-LaCrosse / 345kVBemidji-Grand Rapids/ 230 kVFargo-St. Cloud/Monticello area / 345kVBrookings, SD-SE Twin Cities / 345 kV
Desired In-ServiceProject Group
8CapX 2020 2006
Group 1 Projects Group 1 Projects
Four lines work together to ensure reliability for the regionLines meet most urgent needLines will serve as outlet for whatever generation resources are built(These corridors are preliminary)
9CapX 2020 2006
Group 1 ProjectGroup 1 Project
CapX S.E. Twin CapX S.E. Twin Cities Cities –– Rochester Rochester -- LaCrosseLaCrosse
Improves reliability for south metro Twin Cities, Rochester and LaCrosse areas; improves access to generation in south and eastScope: approx. 110 miles, 345 kilovoltDesired in-service: 2011
10CapX 2020 2006
Group 1 ProjectGroup 1 Project
CapX Bemidji CapX Bemidji ––Grand Rapids Grand Rapids
Improves reliability for Red River Valley, Bemidji and North Central MinnesotaScope: approx. 70 miles, 230 kilovoltDesired in-service: 2011
11CapX 2020 2006
Group 1 ProjectGroup 1 Project
CapX Fargo CapX Fargo –– St. St. Cloud/Monticello Cloud/Monticello AreaArea
Improves reliability in Red River Valley, North Central Minnesota and St. Cloud area, provides some access to new generationScope: approx. 210 miles, 345 kilovoltDesired in-service: 2012
12CapX 2020 2006
Group 1 ProjectGroup 1 Project
CapX Brookings, SD CapX Brookings, SD –– SE Twin CitiesSE Twin Cities
Improves reliability in West Central Minnesota and Twin Cities; access to new generation, including windScope: approx. 250 miles, 345 kilovoltDesired in-service: 2012
13CapX 2020 2006
Moving Into Implementation Moving Into Implementation –– Group 1 PermittingGroup 1 Permitting
1st Half 2007 2nd Half 2007 1st Half 2008 2nd Half 2008 1st Half 2009 2nd Half 2009 1st Half 2010
River Crossing AssessmentRiver Crossing Assessment
Public MeetingsPublic Meetings
File MN CONFile MN CON Review & HearingReview & Hearing CON IssuedCON Issued
Wisconsin CPCN/DNR Permits ProcessWisconsin CPCN/DNR Permits Process
Preliminaryrouting
Preliminaryrouting Final RoutesFinal Routes
Federal Review (RUS, USFWS, Corps) ProcessFederal Review (RUS, USFWS, Corps) Process
Agency/Municipality MeetingsAgency/Municipality Meetings
Minnesota Route Permit ProcessMinnesota Route Permit Process
Routing AnalysisRouting Analysis
2006
14CapX 2020 2006
Moving Into Implementation Moving Into Implementation –– Certificate of Need Certificate of Need
Brookings, SD Brookings, SD –– SE Twin Cities project SE Twin Cities project –– proposed notice areaproposed notice area
15CapX 2020 2006
Implementation Implementation –– Need for CapX “Standards”Need for CapX “Standards”
Define best practices and consistently follow them
Permitting ActivitiesPublic Affairs PlanGeneral Communications Contractual AgreementsDesign & ConstructionProcurement
16CapX 2020 2006
Implementation Implementation –– Integrating Multiple ProjectsIntegrating Multiple Projects
Project Team Leadership AfterAcquiring Need Permits
For a long, complex, multi-party effort, clearly defining accountability & authority is important
Project Team Leadership WhileAcquiring Need Permits
17CapX 2020 2006
Routing (1,2,3,4) Manager
Regulatory / CON Team Project
(1,2,3,4) Manager
Right-of-Way Engineering Contracting
Construction Oversight
Scheduling Accounting
Project Comm.
The CapX Networked OrganizationThe CapX Networked OrganizationSupport & Project TeamsSupport & Project Teams
Communications Team
Standards Team
Legislative Team
Agreements Team
Technical Team
CapX2020 Staff
CapX2020 Vision Team
18CapX 2020 2006
Implementation Implementation –– Issues for the “Build” Phase Issues for the “Build” Phase
Beginning investigation of an optimal model for detailed engineering, procurement, construction managementNeed to analyze availability of skilled trades laborDevelop plan for sequencing construction of individual facilities
19CapX 2020 2006
Planning for the FuturePlanning for the FutureAugust September October November December Q1 2007 Q2 2007
Planning Tasks
SPG/MISO/Non-MISO TP Study CoordinationSPG/MISO/Non-MISO TP Study Coordination
MISO Cost Allocation (RECB) AnalysisMISO Cost Allocation (RECB) Analysis
Group II StudyGroup II StudyJoint Group I StudyJoint Group I Study
MN BP CoordMN BP CoordGroup I CON SupportGroup I CON Support
MN Biennial Plan CoordinationMN Biennial Plan Coordination
Vision Study IIVision Study II
CBED StudyCBED Study
20CapX 2020 2006Created by MISO
21CapX 2020 2006
Buffalo Ridge Area Generation Interconnection Requests(SW MN & SE SD)
Exi
stin
gG
I-010
8
G-1
62 G-1
64G
-176
G-1
77
G-2
41G
-253
G-2
55G
-272
GI-0
219
G-2
78 G-2
87 GI-0
303
G-3
49G
-358
GI-0
326
GI-0
327
G-3
82G
-386
G-3
97G
-398 G
I-040
2G
I-040
3G
-426
GI-0
405
G-4
43G
-444
G-4
42G
-491
G-4
89 G-5
14 G-5
17G
-518 G-5
20G
-532
G-5
36G
-538
G-5
76G
-584
G-5
85G
-586
G-5
87G
-593
G-5
94G
-601
G-6
02G
-603
G-6
13 G-6
14G
-617 G-6
18G
-621
G-6
26G
-634
G-6
35G
-628
G-6
30G
-631
G-6
32G
-633
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Existin
g
G-164
G-253
G-272
G-287
GI-032
6
G-386
G-397
GI-040
3G-44
3G-49
1G-51
4G-52
0G-53
8G-58
5G-59
3G-60
2G-61
4G-62
1G-63
5G-63
1
Interconnection Request
MW
Interconnection RequestsBrookings Co-->TC EHV 1800 MWBRIGO 1200 MWSW MN 825 MW
End of MISO Group 2
End of Group 3
End of Group 4
End of Group 5
SW MN 825
BRIGO 1200
EHV 1800
Created by Excel Engineering
22CapX 2020 2006
www.CapX2020.comwww.CapX2020.com
23CapX 2020 2006
Thank you!Questions, comments, suggestions
Related Documents
