Lecture 6 The CAPM
Lecture 6
The CAPM
Learning outcomes
• By the end of this lecture you should: – Be able to interpret and apply the CAPM, both for individual assets and portfolios
– Know what the assumptions of the CAPM is why they are relevant
– Know how to partition the risk of an asset into a systematic and an unsystematic part, and why it is important
2
Quick recap
• Last lecture we saw how the separation theorem implies all investors hold the same optimal risky portfolio, P*
• In equilibrium, the demand for risky assets must equal the supply of risky assets
• Therefore the optimal risky portfolio must equal the market portfolio, M
• The properties of a risky asset in that portfolio will determine how attractive it is
3
Quick recap
• The relevant properties of our combined portfolio is its risk and expected return
• If we combine several assets, some risk may be diversified away
• How much of an asset’s risk can be diversified away and how much cannot depends on its covariance with the other assets in the portfolio
4
Quick recap
• Last lecture, we derived an expression for the relation between the covariance of an assets returns with the market and the required return of the asset:
• We call this expression the Capital Asset Pricing Model, or the CAPM
fMM
Mifi rrErrCovrrE 2
,
5
Interpretation of the CAPM
• On the LHS we have the expected return of the asset
• We typically refer to this as the required return • It is the return required by the market to compensate for the relevant risk of the asset
• In equilibrium no asset is “better” than some other asset. Each asset is exactly compensated for its risk.
fMM
Mifi rrErrCovrrE 2
,
6
Two special cases of the CAPM
• For the market portfolio M itself, the CAPM simplifies to:
• For the risk free asset the CAPM simplifies to:
MM
fMffMM
MfM
fMM
MMfM
rErE
rrErrrErrE
rrErrCovrrE
2
2
2
,
ff
fMM
ff
fMM
Mfff
rrE
rrErrE
rrErrCov
rrE
2
2
0
,
7
Two special cases of the CAPM
• For M and f the CAPM is simply an identity • Their expected returns are set by the specific preference of people that trade in the market
• These are very hard to figure out and we’ll take the properties of M and f as given (exogenous)
• Once we know these, the CAPM will tell us how any other asset are priced in relation to them
8
Interpretation of the CAPM
• In particular, we take the expected excess return of the market, E(rM)-‐rf, as given
• We often refer to this expected excess return as the market risk premium
• This is the reward we can expect to get for taking on the risk of the market portfolio
• Recall that the covariance of an asset with the market portfolio measures how much risk the asset contributes
fMM
Mifi rrErrCovrrE 2
,
9
The Security Market Line
• We can illustrate this in a graph similar to the CAL
• Each asset is compensated with excess return in relation to its risk in the market portfolio
• We often denote the risk ratio in the CAPM with i
• According to the CAPM, all assets plot on a straight line between f and M in -‐ E(r) space
• We call this line the Security Market Line, SML
rf
M
2
,
M
Mii
rrCov
irESML
10
• An asset’s measures how much risk the assets contributes in the market portfolio, relative to the average contribution
• i > 1 means that Cov(ri, rM) > Var(rM), or that the asset contributes more risk than the average asset
• i < 1 means that Cov(ri, rM) < Var(rM), or that the asset contributes less risk than the average asset
11
The Security Market Line
• Since nobody likes risk, investors will demand higher returns of assets that contribute more risk in the portfolio
• We can interpret the SML much like we interpreted the CAL: – An asset with = 0.5 contributes half the risk of the average asset and gets half the
reward in terms of excess returns
– An asset with = 2 contributes twice the risk of the average asset and gets twice the reward in terms of excess returns
rf
M
2
,
M
Mii
rrCov
irESML
12
A regression formulation
• Although the CAPM tells us the expected return of an asset, we know that realized returns may be higher or lower than that
• It is useful to phrase the CAPM as a regression model, in which we relate realized returns to each other and allow for some random error, :
• We’ll make the usual assumption on , e.g. that it is normally distributed around zero and uncorrelated with the dependent variables, i.e. rM
fMifi rrrr
13
A regression formulation
• Recall from statistics, the univariate OLS regression model:
• The value of is
• In our case, X = rM – rf and Y = ri and = rf:
• This is the CAPM expression that we derived last lecture
XY
XVarYXCov ,
M
Mi
fM
fMi
rVarrrCov
rrVarrrrCov ,,
14
,i Mi f M f
M
Cov r rr r r r
Var r
A regression formulation
• We see that by taking expectations on both sides we can return to our previous formula:
• Given this formulation, we can calculate the risk of an asset by
taking the variance on both sides:
• The second step follows as rf is a constant and the third step is applying our usual manipulations of variances
0fMifi
fMifi
fMifi
fMifi
rrErrEErErErErE
rrrErErrrr
,22fMifMii
fMii
fMifi
fMifi
rrCovVarrrVarrVar
rrVarrVarrrrVarrVar
rrrr
15
A regression formulation
• Since rf is still a constant, we can simplify the expression further:
• Finally, let’s note that since is uncorrelated to rM, the last term equals zero:
• We see that variance of an asset can be partitioned into two parts
,2
,22
2
MMii
fMfMii
rCovVarrVarrVar
rrCovVarrrVarrVar
2222
2
Mii
Mii VarrVarrVar
16
Systematic risk
• The first term in the expression is called systematic risk or market risk
• Recall that is a measure of an assets covariance with the market
• The systematic risk is the part of an asset’s risk that is common with the market
• Since this risk is common with the market it cannot be diversified away in the market portfolio
2222Mii
17
Example
• Suppose we run some industrial firm. Many things could affect our returns.
• For instance, there could be an oil embargo or an earth quake
• These events would affect all firms, so we say that these risks are systematic
• Since all firms are affected, their returns would move together in this situation
• Therefore we cannot diversify the risk away
18
Unsystematic risk
• The second term in the expression is called unsystematic risk or idiosyncratic risk
• The unsystematic risk is the part of an asset’s risk that is particular to the asset itself
• Since this risk comes from sources that do not affect the market it can be diversified away in the market portfolio
2222Mii
19
Example
• Suppose that we step on a nail and cannot work or that an accidental fire burns our plant down
• This would be bad for our returns, but other firms would not be affected
• We call these risks unsystematic • Since other firms are unaffected, we could diversify such risks away by combining many stocks in a portfolio
• It is unlikely that everyone steps on a nail the same day
20
Implications of the CAPM
• The CAPM basically states that only systematic risk is priced
• You are not compensated for taking on unsystematic risk (which can be diversified away anyway)
• Unsystematic risk hurts as much as systematic risk unless it’s diversified away
• The implication is that we should always well-‐diversified portfolios
• It is very hard to beat the market, but it is very easy to lose to it
21
The SML and the CAL
• The SML and the CAL are similar in that they relate expected returns to risk measures
• Individual assets will typically plot under the CAL, as it relates expected returns to total risk, which typically includes some (unpriced) unsystematic part
• All assets will plot on the SML, as it relates expected returns to (priced) systematic risk only
22
The SML and the CAL
• We can see the two types of risk in a graph of the CAL
• The risk of an asset left of the CAL is systematic
• The risk of an asset right of the CAL is unsystematic (and earns no extra expected return)
rf
irECAL
A
P*
A Systematic risk
Unsystematic risk
23
The market portfolio
• Recall that the in equilibrium the market portfolio is the optimal risky portfolio
• By construction, all risk in M is common with itself (the market)
• There is no unsystematic risk in M = P* as seen in the last graph
• There is no unsystematic risk in any portfolio on the CAL, i.e. when on the CAL we get paid for all the risk we take
24
The market portfolio
• If we interpret the as the systematic risk of an asset relative to that of the market, it is obvious that the market portfolio must be one
• Mathematically: 1,2
2
2M
M
M
MMM
rrCov
25
Portfolio
• The of a portfolio is the weighted average of the of the assets in that portfolio
• Consider the portfolio P:
• We manipulate both sides to get the :
• To calculate Cov(w1r1 + w2r2, rM), we set up the covariance matrix:
22211
2
,,
M
M
M
MP rrwrwCovrrCov
2211 rwrwrP
rM
w1r1 Cov(w1r1,rM)
w2r2 Cov(w2r2,rM)
26
Portfolio
• We see that
• Substituting:
• Since the market portfolio consists of all assets on the market and has = 1, the (value weighted) average beta on the market is one
MMMMM rrCovwrrCovwrrwCovrrwCovrrwrwCov ,,,,, 121122112211
2211212
211
2
,,, wwrrCovwrrCovwrrCov
M
M
M
M
M
MPP
27
Assumptions of CAPM
• Investors are price takers – No investor is large enough relative to the market to influence equilibrium prices by her trades
• Investors have identical investment horizons and agree on the statistical properties of all assets – All investors agree on expected returns and covariances of all assets
• Perfect capital markets – There are no financial frictions such as short selling constraints, transaction costs, taxes etc.
28
Assumptions of CAPM
• Investors are rational mean-‐variance optimizers – All investors maximize a utility function somewhat like ours and do so correctly
• There is a risk free asset available to all – All investors can borrow and invest in this at the same rate
• All investors can trade all assets – We disregard assets such as human capital
29
Using the CAPM
• The CAPM has implications for our portfolio choice, e.g. avoid unsystematic risk
• The CAPM allows us to evaluate investment performance by relating returns to the priced risk taken
• We can separate market effects from unsystematic effects
• We can use the CAPM to calculate required returns for non-‐traded assets or firm projects
30