Capital funding priorities in a world of devolution, LEPs, Skills plan and industrial strategy David Hughes, AoC Chief Executive
Capital funding priorities in a world of
devolution, LEPs, Skills plan and
industrial strategy
David Hughes, AoC Chief Executive
Capital funding
How we go to where we are now
College capital projects – starting point
• A College success over the last 25 years
• College ownership and direction of projects
• Mixed funding model (unlike schools)
• Grant + Cash + Asset sales + Loans
• New buildings customised for each College
College funding – some history
• Colleges started self-governing in 1992 with a £800 mil repairs backlog
• LSC (2001-10) supported c£5 bn in college
investment with c£2.5 bn in grants (despite 'crisis' in 2009)
• Coalition protected capital budget at lower level
• SFA (2013-5) supported £0.8 bn in college
investment with c£0.45 bn in grants • Decision in 2013 to create Local Growth Fund
Positive impact of capital investment:
More student numbers Higher student performance Increased employer engagement Income generation Economic regeneration
BIS research on capital investment (2012)
Devolution
Devolution policy
• Long standing desire to devolve/decentralise at same time as centralist tendency in 2000s
• Various vehicles & initiatives, eg RDAs, Total Place,
City Deals, Local Growth Fund
• LEPs & Combined Authorities are current vehicles from new devolution impetus led by Osborne,
• Not clear where May Government stands on this, though Industrial Strategy strong on regional disadvantage & differences
Skills devolution
Devolution deals with skills budget
West Midlands, Greater Manchester,
Liverpool City Region, West of England
Tees Valley, Sheffield City Region,
East Anglia (now just Cambs&Peterboro)
Greater London (2019-20)
In queue to get a deal
Lancashire, Solent, Yorkshire
Skills capital
• Skills capital routed via LEPs since 2015
• Three Growth Deal rounds in 2014, 2015, 2016
• Original skills capital budget c£300 mil/year
• Indicative budget in Growth deal 3 c£120 mil
• Industrial strategy (“£170 mil for IoTs”) implies a lower level of funding
College finances
A cocktail of issues:
• Flat cash funding at a time when costs are rising
• 16-18 funding rate 22% lower than schools 11-16
• Financial weakness in some colleges (15% inadequate)
• Issues with banks, pensions and insolvency regime
• Austerity to continue until 2022 on current plans
College income and finances
Surplus / deficit
(1.0%)
(0.5%)
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
English College Surplus / Deficit as % of Income
2009-10 2011-2 2013-4 2015-6
College capital funding – where are we now
• Despite successes in the past, the capital funding model for colleges is broken
• College estates overall still in need of major investment
• Government grants at lowest ebb since 1998 • Restructuring facility limited in scope
• The two main banks would prefer to cutback
• Some colleges can proceed on basis of strong
internal finances and/or property sales
Developing a positive agenda
What’s driving government
Everything changed in 2016
• Brexit, Brexit, Brexit
• New world order
• New priorities and policies at home:
- “ordinary working class people”
- “schools that work for everyone”
- “modern industrial strategy”
The priorities colleges identify for AoC
Apprenticeships
2017 AoC budget submission
Some of the things we asked for
• Fair funding for colleges - increase £4,000 rate to 11-16 rate,
increase £1.5 Adult Education Budget, guarantee
apprenticeship spending
• Improvements to the system - condition of funding E & m
flexibility, review of sixth forms
• Longer-term targets - education spending 5% of GDP, higher
Maths attainment by 2030
• A Brexit skills plan - English Social Fund
• A funding package for the skills plan – more teaching hours,
more capital funding
Capital & estates – final thoughts
• Colleges are self-governing
• Government is (right now) only a partial and an unreliable funder
• Opportunities for some to work with LEPs and combined authorities
• Focus on how to increase income,
rationalise space, reduce costs & meet employer needs.