Top Banner
Gastric Carcinoma Vic Vernenkar, D.O. St. Barnabas Hospital Department of Surgery
51
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: cancer gastritis.ppt

Gastric Carcinoma

Vic Vernenkar, D.O.

St. Barnabas Hospital

Department of Surgery

Page 2: cancer gastritis.ppt

Background

Second most common cancer-related death. Korea, Japan, China, Taiwan high rates. 22,000 diagnosed annually in US. 14th most common cancer. Difficult to cure, as advanced disease. Most die of recurrent disease even after

resection for cure.

Page 3: cancer gastritis.ppt
Page 4: cancer gastritis.ppt

Anatomy

Stomach begins at GE junction, ends at duodenum.

3 parts- uppermost is cardia, largest part in middle is body, the last part is pylorus.

Cardia contains mucin producing cells. Fundus or body mucoid cells, chief cells,

parietal cells. Pylorus has mucin producing cells.

Page 5: cancer gastritis.ppt

Anatomy

Five layers: Mucosa, submucosa, muscular layer, subserosal layer, serosal layer.

Peritoneum of greater sac covers anterior surface

A portion of lesser sac drapes posteriorly over stomach.

The GE junction has limited serosal covering.

Page 6: cancer gastritis.ppt

Anatomy

The site of the lesion is classified on basis of relationship to long axis of stomach.

40% lower part 40% middle part 15% upper part 10% more than one part Recently the # of lesions proximally has

increased.

Page 7: cancer gastritis.ppt
Page 8: cancer gastritis.ppt

Pathophysiology

Understand vascular supply, allows for understanding of routes of spread.

Derived from celiac artery. Left gastric supplies upper right stomach. Right gastric off common hepatic- lower

portion. Right gastroepiploic -lower portion of

greater curve.

Page 9: cancer gastritis.ppt

Pathophysiology

Understanding lymphatic drainage can clarify nodal involvement.

Complex drainage Primarily along celiac axis. Minor drainage along splenic hilum,

suprapancreatic nodal groups, porta hepatis, and gastroduodenal areas

Page 10: cancer gastritis.ppt

Frequency

US: seventh leading cause of cancer deaths, with 22,000 diagnosed yearly, and 14,000 deaths.

Internationally: second most common cancer. Tremendous geographic variation, with highest death rates in Chile, Japan, and former USSR.

Page 11: cancer gastritis.ppt

Mortality and Morbidity

5-year survival for curative resections ranges from 30-50% for stage II disease and 10-25% in stage III.

High likelihood of systemic and local relapse.

Adjuvant therapy is offered . Operative mortality is less than 3% for

curative resections.

Page 12: cancer gastritis.ppt

Race

Higher in Asian countries. Japanese detect patients at very early stage,

patients appear to do quite well. In Asian studies, patients with resected stage II

and III disease have better outcomes than similar stages in the west.

Some believe this reflects a biologic difference between diseases in Asia and west.

Black race, low socioeconomic class.

Page 13: cancer gastritis.ppt

Sex, Age

Men>women Most are elderly at diagnosis. Median age

65 years. The ones that present in younger patients may represent a more aggressive variant.

Cigarettes

Page 14: cancer gastritis.ppt

History

Early disease has no symptoms, some patients with incidental complaints get an early diagnosis.

If symptoms, it reflects advanced disease; These may include indigestion, nausea, dysphagia, early satiety, anorexia, weight loss.

Page 15: cancer gastritis.ppt

History

Late complications include: pleural effusions, peritoneal effusions, GOO, GE obstruction, SBO, bleeding, jaundice, cachexia.

Page 16: cancer gastritis.ppt

Physical

All physical signs are late events. Too late for curative procedures. Palpable stomach with succussion splash,

hepatomegaly, Virchow nodes, sister MJ nodes, Blumer shelf, weight loss, pallor from bleeding and anemia.

Page 17: cancer gastritis.ppt

Etiology

Diet H. Pylori Previous stomach surgery Pernicious anemia Polyps(rarely a precursor) Atrophic gastritis Radiation, genetics

Page 18: cancer gastritis.ppt

Diet

Certain diets are implicated. Rich in pickled vegetables, salted fish,

excessive dietary salt, smoked meats. A diet that includes fruits and vegetables

rich in vitamin C may have a protective effect.

Page 19: cancer gastritis.ppt

Helicobacter

Implicated as precursor of gastric cancer. H. Pylori associated with atrophic gastritis,

and patients with a history of prolonged gastritis have a 6-fold increase in risk.

Particularly true of tumors of antrum, body, and fundus of stomach, but not in cardia.

Page 20: cancer gastritis.ppt

Previous Surgery

Implicated as risk factor, the rational being that previous gastric surgery alters normal pH of stomach.

Retrospective studies show that a small percentage of patients who have a gastric polyp removed have evidence of invasive carcinoma in the polyp.

Polyps may therefore be premalignant.

Page 21: cancer gastritis.ppt

Genetic Factors

Poorly understood Some familial aggregation exists

Page 22: cancer gastritis.ppt

Laboratory

Assists in determining optimal therapy. CBC identifies anemia, with may be caused

by bleeding, liver dysfunction, or poor nutrition.

30% have anemia. Electrolyte panels and LFTs are also

essential to better characterize patients clinical state.

Page 23: cancer gastritis.ppt

Imaging Studies

EGD: safe, simple, providing a permanent color photographic record.

Obtains tissue for diagnosis. UGI: detects large tumors, but only

occasionally detects extension into esophagus or duodenum, especially if small or submucosal.

Page 24: cancer gastritis.ppt
Page 25: cancer gastritis.ppt
Page 26: cancer gastritis.ppt

Imaging Studies

CXR: done to evaluate for metastases. CT scan or MRI of chest, abdomen, pelvis:

evaluate local disease process, and areas of spread. Some tumors are deemed unresectable based on the testing.

Accurately predicts stage 66-77%. Poor nodal status prediction.

Page 27: cancer gastritis.ppt

Endoscopic Ultrasound Endoscopic ultrasound: becoming extremely

useful as a staging tool, when CT fails to show T3, T4, or metastatic disease.

Used with neoadjuvant chemo to stratify pts Can achieve resolution of 0.1 mm. Cannot reliably distinguish between tumor and

fibrosis. Overall staging accuracy of 75% Poor for T2 lesions (38%) Better for T1(80%), T3 (90%)

Page 28: cancer gastritis.ppt
Page 29: cancer gastritis.ppt
Page 30: cancer gastritis.ppt

Histology

Adenocarcinoma 95% Lymphomas 2% Carcinoids 1% Adenocathomas 1% Squamous cell 1%

Page 31: cancer gastritis.ppt

Histology

Adenocarcinoma is classified according to the most unfavorable microscopic element present: tubular, papillary, mucinous, signet-ring cells.

Also identified by gross appearance: ulcerative, polypoid, scirrous, superficial spreading, multicentric, or Barrett ectopic.

Variety of other schemes: Borrmann, Lauren.

Page 32: cancer gastritis.ppt

Borrmann Classification

5 categories Type I: polypoid or fungating Type II: ulcerating lesions with elevated

borders Type III: ulceration with invasion of wall Type IV: diffuse infiltration Type V: cannot be classified

Page 33: cancer gastritis.ppt

Lauren System

Epidemic or endemic The intestinal, expansive epidemic type

gastric cancer is associated with atrophic gastritis, retained glandular structure, little invasiveness, sharp margins. It would be a Borrmann I or II.

Page 34: cancer gastritis.ppt

Lauren System

The epidemic or Borrmann I or II carries better prognosis, shows no family history.

The diffuse, infiltrative, endemic, is poorly differentiated, with dangerously deceptive margins, invades large areas of stomach. Younger patients, genetic factors, blood groups, and family history.

Page 35: cancer gastritis.ppt

Staging

Primary tumorTx- cannot be assessedT0- no evidenceTis- carcinoma in situ, no invasion of laminaT1- invades lamina propria or submucosaT2- invades muscularis or subserosaT3- penetrates serosa, no adjacent structureT4- invades adjacent structures

Page 36: cancer gastritis.ppt

Regional Lymph Nodes

NX- cannot be assessed

N0- no nodes

N1- mets in 1-6 regional nodes

N2- mets in 7-15 regional nodes

N3- mets in more than 15 regional nodes

Page 37: cancer gastritis.ppt

Distant Metastases

MX- cannot be assessed M0- no distant metastases M1-distant metastases

Page 38: cancer gastritis.ppt

Prognostic Features

Depth of invasion through gastric wall, presence or absence of regional lymph node involvement

The greater number of positive nodes, the greater the likelihood of local or systemic failure postoperatively

Page 39: cancer gastritis.ppt

Spread Patterns

Directly, via lymphatics, or hematogenously

Direct extension into omentum, pancreas, diaphragm, transverse colon, and duodenum.

If lesion extends beyond wall to a free peritoneal surface, peritoneal involvement is frequent.

Page 40: cancer gastritis.ppt

Spread Patterns

The visible gross lesion frequently underestimates true extent.

Abundant lymphatic channels in submucosal and subserosal layers allow for easy spread.

The submucosal plexus is prominent in esophagus, the subserosal plexus prominent in duodenum, which allows for proximal and distal spread.

Liver mets common, from hematogenous spread.

Page 41: cancer gastritis.ppt
Page 42: cancer gastritis.ppt

Laparoscopy

Inspect peritoneal surfaces, liver surface. Identification of advanced disease avoids

non-therapeutic laparotomy in 25%. Patients with small volume metastases in

peritoneum or liver have a life expectancy of 3-9 months, thus rarely benefit from palliative resection.

Page 43: cancer gastritis.ppt

Lymph Node Dissection AJCC: number rather than location of LN is

prognostic. Extent of dissection controversial. Nodal involvement indicates poor prognosis, and

more aggressive approaches to remove them are taking favor.

Ongoing trials regarding this in Europe. Critics argue that the apparent benefit associated

with extended LND reflects stage migration (each LN is reviewed more carefully).

Page 44: cancer gastritis.ppt

Residual Disease R Status

Tumor status following resection. Assigned based on pathology of margins. R0- no residual gross or microscopic

disease. R1- microscopic disease only. R2- gross residual disease. Long term survival only in R0 resection.

Page 45: cancer gastritis.ppt

“D” Nomenclature

Describes extent of resection and lymphadenectomy.

D1- removes all nodes within 3cm of tumor. D2- D1 plus hepatic, splenic, celiac, and left

gastric nodes. D3- D2 plus omentectomy, splenectomy, distal

pancreatectomy, clearance of porta hepatis nodes. Current standards include a D1 dissection only.

Page 46: cancer gastritis.ppt

Type of Surgery

In general most surgeons perform total gastrectomy ( if required for negative margins), esophagogastrectomy for tumors of the cardia and GE junction, and a subtotal gastrectomy for tumors of the distal stomach.

Similar 5 year rates for subtotal vs. total in tumors of distal stomach.

Extensive lymphatics require 5cm margin.

Page 47: cancer gastritis.ppt

Outcome

5-year survival for a curative resection is 30-50% for stage II disease, 10-25% for stage III disease.

Adjuvant therapy because of high incidence of local and systemic failure.

A recent Intergroup 0116 randomized study offers evidence of a survival benefit associated with postoperative chemoradiotherapy

Page 48: cancer gastritis.ppt

Complications

Mortality 1-2% Anastamotic leak, bleeding, ileus, transit

failure, cholecystitis, pancreatitis, pulmonary infections, and thromboembolism.

Late complications include dumping syndrome, vitamin B-12 deficiency, reflux esophagitis, osteoporosis.

Page 49: cancer gastritis.ppt

Adjuvant Therapy

Rationale is to provide additional loco-regional control.

Radiotherapy- studies show improved survival, lower rates of local recurrence when compared to surgery alone.

In unresectable patients, higher 4 year survival with mutimodal tx, in comparison to chemo alone.

Page 50: cancer gastritis.ppt

Chemotherapy

Numerous randomized clinical trials comparing combination chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting to surgery alone did not demonstrate a consistent survival benefit.

The most widely used regimen is 5-FU, doxorubicin, and mitomycin-c. The addition of leukovorin did not increase response rates.

Page 51: cancer gastritis.ppt

Advanced Unresectable Disease

Surgery is for palliation, pain, allowing oral intake

Radiation provides relief from bleeding, obstruction and pain in 50-75%. Median duration of palliation is 4-18 months