ICPSR Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research Canadian National Election Study, 1965 Philip Converse John Meisel Maurice Pinard Peter Regenstreif Mildred Schwartz ICPSR 7225 This document was previously available in paper format only. It was converted to Portable Document Format (PDF), with no manual editing, on the date below as part of ICPSR's electronic document conversion project. The document may not be completely searchable. No additional updating of this collection has been performed (pagination, missing pages, etc.). June 2002
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
ICPSR Inter-university Consortium for
Political and Social Research
Canadian National Election Study, 1965
Philip Converse John Meisel
Maurice Pinard Peter Regenstreif Mildred Schwartz
ICPSR 7225 This document was previously available in paper format only. It was converted to Portable Document Format (PDF), with no manual editing, on the date below as part of ICPSR's electronic document conversion project. The document may not be completely searchable. No additional updating of this collection has been performed (pagination, missing pages, etc.).
June 2002
ICPSR
This PDF file contains pages that are larger than 8.5x11. Click the Shrink to Fit or Fit to Page option in the print menu to print all pages on letter size paper.
I --mI”^-e-P -n_.*“LII...“._.I ..*...*._- _- -, _ -...*-. _ , L, .,:“-~-“~~ . ..I. I
INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL AND SOCIAL RESEARCH
I C
CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
1965
P S R
I Philip Converse
Principal John Meisel Investigators Maurice Pinard
Peter Regenstreif Mildred Schwartz
The University of Michigan Queen’s University McGill University University of Rochester
. ..NOR.C_~ IJnivercitv nf Chimrm
CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
1965
---_ .._ -.
CANAD IAN NAT I ONAL ELECT ION STUDY, 1965
ICPSR STUDY NUMBER 7225
Principal Investigators:
Philip Converse University of Michigan
Jokm Meisel Queen's University
Mmrice Pinard E&ill University
Peter Regenstreif university of Rochester
Mildred Schwartz NORC, University of Chicago
ICPSR Edition First Printing, 1972
Second Printing, 1978
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research P.O. Box 1248
AnnArbor, Michigan 48106
ACJCNWLECGEWOFASSISTANCE
All manuscripts utilizing data mde available through the Consortium should acknowledge that fact as well as identify the original collector of the data. The ICPSR Council urges all users
of ICPSR data facilities to follow some adaptation of this state- ment with the parentheses indicating items to be filled in appro-
priately or deleted by the individual user.
The data (and tabulations) utilized in this (publication) were made available (in part) by the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. The data were originally collected by Philip Converse, John Meisel, Maurice Pinard, Peter Regenstreif, and Mildred Schwartz. Neither the original collectors of the data nor the Con- sortium bear any responsibility for the analyses or interpretations presented here.
In order to provide funding agencies with essential information
about the use of archival resources, and to facilitate the exchange of inform&ion about ICPSR participants' research activities, each user of the ICPSR data facilities is expected to send two copies of
each completed mmuscript or thesis abstract to the Consortium. Please indicate in the cover letter which data were used.
STUDY DESCRIPTION
THE 1365 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY @AS CONDUCTED BY PHILIP CONVERSE (THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN), JOHN MEISEL (QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY), MAURICE PINARD (MCGILL UNIVERSITY), PETER REGENSTREIF (UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER), AND MILDRED SCHWARTZ (NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER, THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO). THE RESPONDENTS NERE AD?lINISTERED A POST-ELECTION SURVEY DURING THE AUTUMN AND EARLY WINTER OF 1965-1966.
THE INTEFV_ZEW SCHEDULE, CONSISTING OF BOTH OPEN- AND CLOSED-ENDED QUESTIONS, SPANNED A VIDE AREA OF POLITICAL, SQCIOLOGICAL , AND PERSONAL DATA. THE MAIN THRUST OF THE INVESTIGATION 3AS DIRECTED TOHARD THE RESPONDENTS' POLITICAL ATTITUDES AND OPINIONS, AND THEIR PERCEPTIONS OF THE CANADIAN PARTIES, LEADERS, AND CAMPAIGN ACTIVITIES.
OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS TAPPED THE RESPONDENTS' PERCEPTION OF T!-IE PROBLEMS CONFRONTING CANADA, WHICH OF THESE PROBLEMS RELATED PERSONALLY TO THEM, AND WHAT CAMPAIGN ISSUES WERE SAISED DURING THE ELECTION. THE STUDY CONTAINS CLOSED-ENDED QUES'rIONS WHICH PROBE THE RESPONDENTS' REACTIONS TO SPECIFIC ELECTION CONTROVERSIES. THE STANDARD VARIABLES ON POLITICAL EFFICACY AND CYNICISM TOWARDS GOVERNRENT WERE INCLUDED ALONG WTTH SOME QUESTIONS PERTAINING TO THE RESPONDENTS' PAST AND PRESENT FINANCIAL STATUS, AND HIS/HER EXPECTED FINANCIAL POSITION IN THE FUTURE AS A RESULT OF THE ELECTION OUTCOME,
PROVINCIAL AND REGIONAL CO?JFLICTS AND AFFINITIES HERE EXPLORED BY SEVERAL QUESTIONS INQUIRING WHICH PROVINCES WERE ZORE POFERFUL, BETTER OFF, AND WORSE OFF. PERCEPTIONS OF POLITICAL PARTIES (IN SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL FORM) WERE OBTAINED BY ASKING THE RESPONDENTS TO COMPARE THEIR '*IDEAL PARTY" WITH THE ACTUAL CANADIAN PARTIES, AND BY INQUIRING WHICH TWO FEDERAL PARTIES WERE "MOST ALIKE" IN THE RESPOND- ZNTS OPINION AND WHICH TWO WERE "LEAST ALIKE". RESPONDENTS WERE QUERIED ABOUT THE REGIONAL SOURCES OF POWER OF CONTEMPOR- ARY POLITICAL FIGURES IN A LIST, AND THEY WERE ASKED TO MENTION THEIR CHOICE OF PRIHE HINISTER. MANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE RESPONDENTS' POLITICAL PARTY ASSOCIATIONS AND ATTACHMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE STUDY. IF RESPONDENTS HAD CHANGED THEIR PARTY ATTACHMENT SOMETIHE IN THE PAST, OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS PROBED FOR THE CAUSES OF THE SHIFT. DATA CONCERNING THE RESPONDENTS' PREVIOUS VOTING BEHAVIOUR WERE SOLICITED AS NELL AS INFORMATION ON POLITICAL AND VOTING ACTIVITIES FOR 1965. ALSO, DATA WERE COLLECTED REGARDING THE RESPONDENTS' CAMPAIGN ACTIVITES, PARTY INVOLVEflENT, AND TIHE OR MONEY CONTRIBUTIONS AS WELL AS THE RESPONDENTS* ATTITUDES ABOUT CAHPAIGN FINANCING.
PERSONAL DATA INCLUDE THE STANDARD VARIABLES, SUCH AS EDUCATION, RELIGION, OCCUPATION, AND AGE, IN ADDITION TO VARIABLES SUCH AS MEMBERSHIP IN VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS AND THE INDIVIDUALS‘ MOBILITY WITHIN CANADA.
THL FOLLOWING YARIABLES WERE ASKED OF QUEBEC RESIDENTS ONLY: (1) THE RESPONDENTS' PRESENT AND FUTURE EVALUATION OF THE CAOUETTE WING OF THE SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY AND (2) FREQUENCY OF EXTRA-FAMILIAL ACQUAINTANCES.
SAMPLING INFORMATION
INDIVIDUALS INTERVIEWED FOR THE "1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY" FORM A STRATIFIED PROBABILITY CROSS-SECTXON SAMPLE OF THE CANADIAN POPULATION ELIGIULE TO VOTE IN 1965,
THE SAMPLE POPULATION WAS DRAWN FROM A EASE WHICH EXCLUDED APPROXIMATELY 7% OF THE CANADIAN POPULATION (DUE TO RESIDENCE IN CONSTITUENCIES WITH LOW ACCESSIBILITY), AND INCLUDED FROM THE REMAINING 93x, ONLY THOSE PERSONS ENUMERATED ON THF PRELIMINARY 1965 LIST OF VOTERS, FROM THE RESULTING POPULATION, CONSTITUENCIES WERE STRATIFIED ON THE BASIS OF THESE VARIABLES: (1) PROVINCE, (2) RURAL-URBAN DISTRIBUTION, AND (3) 1963 LIBERAL VOTING PERZENTAGES (EXCEPT IN RURAL ,QUEBEC ;JHERE THE CREDITISTE PERCENTAGES WERE SUBSTITUTED FOB LIBERAL).
CONSTITUENCIES IN WHICH INTERVIEWS WOULD BE TAKEN WERE SELECTED BY THE FOLLOWING METHOD:
1. AN INTERVAL (I) WAS CREATED BY DIVIDING THE TOTAL BASE POPULATION OF THE SAMPLE BY 121 (THE NUMBER OF SAMPLING CLUSTERS DESIRED AS OPTIBAL).
2. A RANDOM START NUMBER (R) WAS SELECTED WITHIN THAT INTERVAL.
3. THE INTERVAL VALUE AND THE RANDOM START NUMBER WERE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A NAME LIST OF THE TOTAL BASE POPULATION SUCH THAT CONSTITUENCIES IN WHICH THE VOTERS R, R+I, R+2I I---, R+1201 RESIDED WERE INCLUDED IN THE SAMPLE. THUS, THE FINAL SAMPLE INCLUDED 721 CLUSTERS; HOWEVER, THE POPULATION OF THREE CLUSTERS (HALIFAX, YORK-SCARBOROUGH, AND EDMONTON-STRATHCONA) WAS LARGE ENOUGH TO BE SAMPLED TWICE, WHICH EXPLAINS WHY ONLY 118 CONSTITUENCIES APPEAR IN THE SAMPLE,
THE SELECTION OF POLLING DIVISIONS WITHIN THE CHOSEN CONSTITUENCIES CONSTITUTED THE NEXT SAEPLING STEP. IT WAS CARRIED OUT AS FOLLOWS:
1, THE TOTAL NUMBER OF AVAILABLE POLLING DIVISIONS IN THE CONSTITUENCY WAS DIVIDED BY 28 AND ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST WHOLE NUMBER, THIS WAS THE INTERVAL I.
2. A RANDOR NUMBER BETWEEN 1 AND THIS INTERVAL WAS THEN CHOSEN. THIS WAS THE START NUMBER M.
3. POLLING DIVISIONS NUMBERED M, M+I, M+21... WERE
RECORDED UNTIL THE LIST OF POLLS WAS EXHAUSTED. THIS YIELDED 27, 28, OR 29 POLL NUMBERS PER CONSTITUENCY IN EVERY CASE. THE NUMBER OF VOTERS IN THE POLL WAS ENTERED BESIDE EACH POLL NUMBER AND THESE BERE LISTED IN ORDER AND TOTALLED.
4. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTERS WAS DIVIDED BY 7 (THE NUMBER OF POLLS TO BE FINALLY CHOSEN) TO YIELD A NEY INTERVAL (R).
5. A NEW RANDOM NUMBER (P) EQUAL TO OR LESS THAN THE NEW INTERVAL, R, WAS PICKED.
6. THE 7 POLLS PROM NHICH RESPONDENTS WERE SELECTED WERE OBTAINED BY STARTING AT THE POLLING DIVISION IN THE LIST NUMBERED P, AND INCLUDING THIS POLL AND P+R, P+2R, . . . . P+6R.
THE SELECTION OF THE INDIVIDUAL RESPONDENTS PROCEEDED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A RANDOM NUMBER BETWEEN 0 AND THE TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTERS ON THE LIST WAS SELECTED.
2. THE PERSON WHOSE NAME FELL BESIDE THAT NUMBER WAS SELECTED, AND THEREAFTER, EVERY 8TH PERSON (TO AVOID CHOOSING MORE THAN ONE MEMBER OF THE SAME FAMILY) UNTIL THERE WERE SIX NAMES. THE FIRST FOUR OF THESE WERE THE RESPONDENTS, THE OTHER TWO HERE SPARES TO BE INTERVIEWED ONLY IN THE EVENT THAT THE SAMPLE SIZE WOULD HAVE BEEN INCREASED.
THE INVESTIGATORS PROCEEDED FRON THE ASSUMPTION THAT 28 INTERVIEWS PER CLUSTER WOULD BE DESIRABLE. THE RESULT WAS AN ORIGINAL POTENTIAL SAHPLE SIZE OF 3388 NAMES. BEFORE THE ACTUAL INTERVIEW, EACH OF THESE INDIVIDUALS WAS BAILED A LETTER EXPLAINING THE PURPOSE OF THE SURVEY AND THE OBJECT OF THE INTERVIEW. THE INVESTIGATORS HOPED THAT THE LETTER WOULD YIELD A HIGHER RESPONSE RATE. THE ACTUAL FIELD WORK WAS ACCOMPLISHED BY CANADIAN FACTS, A COMMERCIAL MARKETING RESEARCH ORGANIZATION WITH A NATION-WIDE FIELD ORGANIZATION. THE INTERVIEWERS WERE INSTRUCTED TO MAKE THREE ATTEHPTS TO SURVEY EACH POTENTIAL RESPONDENT. IN CERTAIN AREAS (ESPECIAL- LY TORONTO, VANCOUVER, AND WINDSOR), A SECOND LETTER WAS SENT TO THE ORIGINAL POTENTIAL RESPONDENTS IN ORDER TO IMPROVE THE RESPONSE RATE. THE OVERALL RESPONSE RATE WAS APPROXIMATELY 62.5 PERCENT.
THE DATA FOR THIS STUDY ARE BASED ON 2118 COMPLETED INTERVIEWS. FIVE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES ORIGINALLY SCREENED FROM INCLUSION WERE RECENTLY REVIEWED, CODED AND ADDED TO THE STUDY. CONSEQUENTLY, THE UNWEIGHTED N OF 2118 Dl-FFEFS BY 5 FROB THE N OF 2113 REPORTED IN PUBLICATIONS SASED ON A DATA SOURCE PRIOR TO THE PRESENT RELEASE.
FOR A MORE DETAILED EXPLANATION OF THE SAMPLING HETHOD, THE USER SHOULD CONSULT JOHN MEISEL AND RICK VAN LOON, "CANADIAN ATTITUDES T(3 ELECTION EXPENSES 1965-1966". IN COMMITTEE ON ELECTION EXPENSES, STUDIES IN CANADIAN-PARTY FINANCE (OTTAiJA: QUEEN'S PRINTER, 1966), PP. 23-146,
WEIGHTING INPORMATION
T%O FORMS OF THE WEIGHT VARIABLE ARE PRESENT IN THE STUDY-- AN INTEGER WEIGHT VARIABLE AND A DECIMAL WEIGHT VARIABLE. BOTH VERSIONS CORRECT SAMPLING DEPFICIENCIES IN IDENTICAL FASHION, ONLY ONE OF THE VARIABLES USES INTEGER VALUES AND THE OTHER, DECIMAL NUMBERS. THE USER MUST DECIDE WHICH FORM OF THE ijEIGHT VARIABLE IS MOST DESIRABLE FOR THE ANALYSIS PROGRAMS AT HIS/HER COMPUTER INSTALLATION. BEAR TN MIND, HaWEVFR, THAT A VERSION OF THE WEIGHT VARIABLE HUST BE ALWAYS USED WHEN EXECUTING ANALYSIS PROGRAMS ON THE DATA.
!?EIGHT VARIABLE TYPE UNWEIGHTED N 2EIGHTED N
INTEGER WEIGHT VARIABLE (V3) 2118 8193
DECIMAL WEIGHT VARIABLE (V4) 2118 2729.04
PLEASE NOTE THAT IN SOME PUBLICATIONS THE WEIGHTED N (VEIGHTED BY THE DECIMAL WEIGHT VARXAELE) IS REPORTED AS 2596 INSTEAD OF 2729.04 AS REPORTED HERE. THIS DISCREPANCY STEMS IN PART FROM THE FACT THAT THE BRITISH COLUMBIA RESPONDENTS WERE ORIGINALLY WRONGLY NEIGHTED. THE DATA SET DISTRIBUTED BY THE CONSORTIUM CORRECTS THE WEIGHTS FOR THE BRITISH COLUlYBIA RESPONDENTS (ORIGINALLY 1, NOW 2) AS PER THE REQUEST OF PROFESSOR JOHN MEISEL.
PUBLICATIONS/PAPERS USING THE 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION DATA
JOHN MEISEL & RICK VAN LOON, "CANADIAN ATTITUDES TO ELECTION EXPENSES 1965-1966", IN COMMITTEE ON ELECTION EX- PENSES, STUDIES TN CANADIAN PARTY FINANCE (OTTAUA: QUEEN'S PRINTER, 1966), PP. 23-146.
RICK VAN LOON, "POLITICAL PARTICIPATION TN CANADA: THE 1965 ELECTION", CANADIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE (111:3, SEPTEBBER, 1970). PP. 376-399.
RICK VAN LOON E MICHAEL WHITTINGTON, THE CANADIAN POLITICAL SYSTEM (SCARBOROUGH: MCGRAW-HILL OF CANADA, 1971), PASSIH.
MILDRED A. SCWARTZ, "CANADIAN VOTING BEHAVIOUR", IN RICHARD
ROSE (ED.1 , COMPARATIVE ELECTORAL BEHAVIOUR (NEW YORK: PREE PRESS, FORTHCOMING).
HILDRED A. SCWARTZ, THE: DIVISIONS OF CANADA (FORTHCOMING).
JOHN MEISEL, "DARTY IMAGES IN CANADA: A REPORT ON WORK IN PRO- GRESS", UORKING PAPERS IN CANADIAN POLITICS (MCGILL -QUEEN'S PRESS, 1972).
RICK VAN LOON, CANADIAN ELECTORAL PARTICIPATION (UNPUBLISHED PH,D, THESIS, QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY, 1968).
PHILIP E. CONVERSE, GEORGES DWPEUX E JOHN MEISEL, "CONTINW- ITIES IN POPULAR POLITICAL CULTURE: FRENCH AND ANGLO-SAXON CONTRASTS IN CANADA". (UNPUBLISHED PAPER PRESENTED AT THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 09 COMPARATIVE ELECTORAL BEHAVIOUR, HELD AT THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN IN APRIL, 1967).
PROCESSING INFORMATION
THE STUDY WAS PROCESSED ACCORDING TO ICPR-SURVEY RESEARCti ARCHIVE PROCESSING PROCEDURES. CODE CATEGORIES WERE RECC?DED TO ELIMINATE AMPS, DASHES, AND BLANKS PRESENT IN THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTATION. "MISSING DATA", RELIGION, AND COUNTRY CODES WERE RECODED TO CONFORN TO ICPR STANDARDIZED CODES. A LIMITED NUMBER OF WILD CODES HERE ENCOUNTERED IN OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS AND CORRECTED BY INSPECTING THE QUESTIONNAIRE OF THE RESPOND- ENTS INVOLVED. SOME VARIABLES WERE REFORMATTED TO ACCOEPLISH YORE EFFICIENT ACCESS OF THE DATA FOR THE USER, OR ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATION OF THE DATA.
V260-V262 AND V294-V295 ARE VARIABLES WHICH !JERE REFORBATTED TO FACILITATE THE USER'S ACCESS TO THE DATA. EACH OF THESE VARIABLES CONSISTS OF TN0 OR MORE SETS OF QUESTIONS ASKED OF DIFFERENT GROUPS OF RESPONDENTS, UITH EACH SET OF QUESTIONS FOLLOWING A CONSTRUCTION PARALLEL TO THE OTHER ONE(S). RATHER THAN PROVIDE THE USER WITH SEVERAL VARIABLES WHICH MUST BE ACCESSED INDIVIDUALLY IN ORDER TO DETERMINE THE TOTALITY OF THE INFORMATION, THE COMPARABLE QUESTIONS FRON THE VARIOUS SETS HAVE BEEN CONSOLIDATED IN SINGLE VARIABLES WITH A UNIFORN CODING SCHEME.
V13-V23, V57-V84, V86-V105, AND v316-V326 ARE VARIABLES REFORMATTED TO ACCOBPLISH ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATION OF THE CODING SCHEME. FOR EXAMPLE, SEVERAL CLUSTERS OF VARIABLES SANPLE THE RESPONDENT'S OPINIONS OF THE VARIOUS PROVINCES. THE RESPONDENT WAS NOT SPECIFICALLY PROBED CONCERNING EACH INDIVIDUAL PROVINCE, BUT RATHER HE RESPONDED %ITH THE NAMES OF THE PROVINCES THAT CAME TO HIS HIND, AS THOUGH THE QUESTION WERE OPEN-ENDED. FOR ANY GIVEN PROVINCE, THE ANSWERS OF THE RESPONDENTS WHO DID NOT MENTION THAT PARTICULAR PROVINCE BUT RESPONDED TO THE QUESTION WITH OTHER NANES WERE SEPARATED IN THE CODING SCHEME FROH THE CATEGORIES OF "NA" OR "INAP" WHERE
THEY HAD PREVIOUSLY RESIDED.
FREQUENCIES
FREQUENCIES FOR ALL VARIABLES IN THIS CODEBOOK HAVE BEEN INSERTED EITHER TO THE LEFT OF THE CODE VALUE (SEE 12 IN THE CODEBOOK INFORMATION SECTION) OR DIRECTLY UNDER THE LAST CODE DESCRIPTION. THE FREQUENCIES PROVIDED IN THIS CODZBOOK ARE WEIGHTED BY THE INTEGER WEIGHT VARIABLE (VAR- IABLE 3)s
CODEBOOK INFORHATION
THE EXABPLE BELOW IS A REPRODUCTION (NOT ACTUAL SIZE) OF INFORMATION APPEARING IN THE MACHINE-READABLE CODEBOOK FOR A TYPICAL VARIABLE. THE NUMBERS IN CIRCLES DO NOT APPEAR IN THE CODEBOOK, BUT ABE REFERENCES TO THE DESCRXPTIONS NHTcH FOLLOW THIS EXAMPLE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..*......................
1. INDICATES THE VARIARLE AND REFERENCE NUilBERS. A VARIABLE AND A REFERENCE NUMBER ARE ASSIGNED TO EACH ITEM IN THE STUDY. IN THE PRESENT CODEBOOK, WHICH DOCUPlENTS THE ARCHIVED DATASET, THESE NUMBERS ARE IDENTICAL. SHOULD THE DATA BE SUBSETTED OR REARRANGED BY AN OSIRIS PROGRAM (E.G., HfiP2 TO INTERSPERSE DATA FROM ANOTHER SOURCE, OR TCOT2 TO PRODUCE AN ANALYSIS DECK), THE VARIABLE NUMBERS WOULD CHANGE TO REFLECT THE ORDER OF THE NEW DATASET, UHILE THE REFERENCE NUMBERS WOULD REMAIN UNCHANGED TO REFLECT THE VARIABLE NUMBER IN THE CODEBOOK DESCRIBING THE ARCHIVED DATASET.
2. INDICATES THE FOUR COLUBN ICPR STUDY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER UNIQUE TO THIS DATASET.
3. INDICATES THE ABBREVIATED (24 CHARACTERS MAXIMUM) VARIABLE NAME USED WITHIN THE OSIRIS SYSTEM TO IDENTIFY THE
::
i).
5.
6.
7.
a.
9.
10.
11.
12,
13.
14.
VARIABLE FOR THE USER, AN EXPANDED VERSION OF THESE NAMES CAN SE FOUND IN THE TABLE OF CONTENTS, WHERE AN 1x1 PRE- CEDES THE NAME OF A VARIABLE CONTINGENT ON ANOTHER VARIA3LE DUE TO THE STRUCTURE OF THE INTERVIEK SCHEDULE.
INDICATES THE DESIGNATION OF MISSING DATA. IN THIS EXAMPLE CODE VALUES EQUAL TO ZERO OR GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO EIGHT ARE MISSING DATA (MD=0 OR GE 8). ALTERN- ATIVE STATEMENTS FOR OTHER VARIABLES ARE OF THE FORM "ED=GF: 90", OR “NO MISSING DATA CODES", SOtiE ANALYSIS SOFTKARE PACKAGES (INCLUDING THE OSIRIS SOFTWARE PACK- AGE) REQUIRE THAT CERTAIN TYPES OF DATA WHICH THE USER DESIRES TO EXCLUDE FROM ANALYSIS BE DESIGNATED AS "MISSING DATA", E.G., INAPPROPRIATE, UNASCERTAINED, UNASCERTAINABLE 3R AMBIGUOUS DATA CATEGORIES. ALTHOUGH THESE CATEGORIES ARE DEFINED AS MISSING DATA CATEGCRIES, THIS DOES NOT fiEAN THAT A USER SHOULD NOT OR CANNOT USE THESE CODES IN A SUBSTANTIVE ROLE IF HE SO DESIRES.
A MULTIPLE RESPONSE VARIABLE IS DENOTED BY THE MESSAGE, "MULT RESPS X" , #HERE X IS THE NUflBER OF RESPONSES,
INDICATES THE STARTING LOCATION AND WIDTH OF THIS VARIAaLE 2HEN THE DATA ARE STORED ON A MAGNETIC TAPE IN THE OSIRIS ?ORMAT. IF THE VARIASLE IS A MULTIPLE RESPONSE ITEM, THE STARTING LOCATION AND WIDTH ALLUDE TO THE FIRST RESPONSE CODED,
INDICATES THE LOCATION BY DECK AND COLUMN(S) OF THIS VARIABLE WHEN THE DATA ARE ON CARDS OR IN CARD IMAGE FORM (EITHER 80 OR 84 COLUMN FORMAT)
A VARIABLE CONTAINING DATA WITH IMPLIED DECIMALS IS DENOTED BY THE MESSAGE "XX DEC PLACE(S)", WHERE XX IS THE NUMBER OF DECIMAL PLACES IMPLIED (NOT PUNCHED) IN THE VARIABLE.
INDICATES 'THE FULL TEXT (QUESTION) SUPPLIED BY THE INVESTIGATOR TO DESCRIBE THE VARIABLE.
INDICATES AN ADDITIONAL COMMENT OR EXPLANATION APPENDED TO THE VARIABLE DESCRIPTION.
A VARIABLE WHICH HAS A FOOTNOTE ASSOCIATED WITH IT IS DENOTED BY THE MESSAGE, "SEE NOTE(S) X", WHERE X IS THE NUMBER OF THE FOOTNOTE REFERENCED.
INDICATES THE FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF EACH CODE VALUE- FREQUENCIES FOR MULTIPLE RESPONSE VARIABLES ARE CUMULATIVE.
INDICATES THE CODE VALUES OCCURRING IN THE DATA FOR THIS VARIABLE.
INDICATES THE TEXTUAL DEFINITIONS OF THE CODES.
CONTENTS
VARIABLE VARIABLE NAME PAGE NUMBER NO.
1 ICPR STUDY NUfiBER-7225 2 INTERVIEN NUMBER
WEIGHT AND GEOGRAPHIC DATA
3 INTEGER HEIGHT VARIABLE 4 DECIMAL WEIGHT VARIABLE 5 PROVINCE OF INTERVIEW 6 CONSTITUENCY OF INTERVIEB 7 SIZE OF PLACE
1
NATIONAL PROBLEMS
8 PROBLEMS FACING CANADA 7 9 NATIONAL PROBLEMS OF SPECIAL CONCERN TO R 8
10 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT THE ELECTION OUTCOME 10 11 XEXTRA FEELINGS TOWARD THE ELECTION OUTCOME 11 12 LEVEL OF GOV'T HANDLING PROBLEMS:FEDERAL/PROVINCE 12
PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS: POWER & INFLUENCE
13 ANY PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT POWERFUL 14 XNEWFOUNDLAND - POWER 15 XPRINCE EDWARD ISLAND - POWER 16 XNOVA SCOTIA - POWER 17 XNEW BRUNSWICK - POWER 18 XQUEBEC - POWER 19 XONTARIO - POWER 20 XMANITOBA - POWER 21 XSASKATCHEWAN - POWER 22 XALBERTA - POWER 23 XBRITISH COLUMBIA - PONER
24 LEVEL OF GOV'T MORE INFLUENTIAL TO R
25 R'S OPINION OF WHAT ELECTION ISSUES WERE 26 IMPORTANCE OF SOCIAL WELFARE ISSUE TO R 17 27 IMPORTANCE OF ECONOMIC ISSUES TO R 18 28 IMPORTANCE OF ENGLISH-FRENCH CANADIANS RELATIONS 29 IMPORTANCE OF FLAG ISSUE TO R 19 30 IMPORTANCE OF CANADIAN UNITY TO R 31 IMPORTANCE OF CORRUPTION IN GOV'T TO R 32 IHPORTANCE OF MAJORITY GOV'T ISSUE TO R 20
13
14
15
16
ELECTION ISSUES AND THEIR IMPORTANCE TO R
CONTENTS
VARIABLE VARIABLE NAME NUMBER
PAGE NO.
33
34 35 36
?7 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
48 49 SO 51 52 53
57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
IMPORTANCE OF STRONG LEADERSHIP TO R
MAJORITY GOV'T MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE TO R WOULD R CHANGE VOTE TO SUPPORT MAJORITY GOV'T R'S INTEREST IN POLITICS
POLITICAL EFFICACY G CYNICISM
PEOPLE IN GOV'T ARE CROOKED GCV’T WASTES R'S TAX MONEY HOW OFTEN CAN R TRIJST THE GOV'T DOES EVERYONE RECEIVE A FAIR BREAK FROM GOV'T GOV'T OFFICIALS KNOW NHAT TO DO VOTING EFFECTIVE PI)LITICAL WEAPON GOV'T DOES NOT CARE ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE R POLITICS TOO DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND PEOPLE LIKE R HAVE NO SAY IN GOV'T ELECTED OFFICIALS LOSE TOUCH WITH CONSTITUENCY TOO MANY INTELLECTUALS IN GOV'T
RESPONDENT'S FINANCIAL SITUATION
R SATISFIED WITH PERSONAL FINANCIAL SITUATION HAS R'S FINANCIAL SITUATION IMPROVED IN PAST YES DOES R'S FINANCIAL SITUATION LOOK FAVORABLE WILL R'S FINANCIAL SITUATION IMPROVE IN FUTURE DOES ELECTION AFFECT R'S FINANCIAL SITUATION XWILL ELECTION EFFECT BE BETTER/WORSE ON R'S FINANCIAL SITUATION HAS R BEEN UNEMPLOYED IN PAST YEAR HAS ANY FAMILY MEMBER BEEN UNEMPLOYED PAST YEAR R/FAMILY MEMBER BEEN UNEMPLOYED IN LAST 3 YEARS
PROVINCES BETTER OFF
ANY PROVINCES BETTER OFF THAN OTHERS XNEWFOUNDLAND - BETTER OFF XPRINCE EDWARD ISLAND - BETTER OFF XNOVA SCOTIA - BETTER OFF XNEW BRUNSWICK - BETTER OFF XQUEBEC - BETTER OFF XONTARIO - BETTER OFF XHANITOBA - BETTER OFF XSASKATCHEBAN - BETTER OFF XALBERTA - BETTER OFF XBRITISH COLUMBIA - BETTER OFF
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
31
32
CONTENTS
VARIABLE VARIABLE NAME NUMBER
68 XMARITIMES - BETTER OFF 69 XPRAIRIES - BETTER OFF 70 XSPECIFIC REGIONS - BETTER OFF
PROVINCES WORSE OFF
71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 a2 83 84 85
ANY PROVINCES WORSE OFF THAN OTHFRS XNEWFOUNDLAND - WORSE OFF XPRINCE EDWARD ISLAND - WORSE OFF XNOVA SCOTIA - NORSE OFF XNEW BRUNSWICK - HORSE OFF XQUEBEC - WORSE OFF XONTARIO - WORSE OFF XMANITOBA - WORSE OFF XSASKATCHEWAN - WORSE OFF XALBERTA - WORSE OFF XBRITISH COLUMBIA - WORSE OFF XMARITIMES - WORSE OFF XPRAIRIES - WORSE OFF XSPECIFIC REGIONS - WORSE OFF XR'S PROVINCE BETTER OR WORSE OFF
PROVINCES IN WHICH R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE
86 XNEWFOUNDLAND - R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 87 XPRINCE EDWARD ISLAND - R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 88 XNOVA SCOTIA - R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 89 XNEW BRUNSWICK - R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 90 XQUEBEC - R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 91 XONTARIO - R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 92 XMANITOBA - R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 93 XSASKATCHEWAN - R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 94 XALBERTA -- R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 95 XBRITISH COLUMBIA - R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN
PROVINCES IN WHICH R WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE
96 XNEWFOUNDLAND - R WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE IN 97 XPRINCE EDWARD ISLAND -R WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE 98 XNOVA SCOTIA - R WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE IN 99 XNEW BRUNSWICK - R WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE IN
100 XQLJEBEC - R WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE IN 101 XONTARIO - R WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE IN 102 XMANXTOBA - R WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE IN 103 XSASKATCHEWAN - R WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE IN
PAGE NO.
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
IN45
46
47
CONTENTS
VARIABLE VARIABLE NAME 'PAGE NUMBER NO,
104 105
106 XDIEFENBAKEH-- MARITIMES CONNECTIONS 107 XDIEFENBAKER--QUEBEC CONNECTIONS 108 XDIEPENBAKER--ONTARIO CONNECTIONS 109 XDIEFENBAKER-- PRAIRIES CONNECTIONS 110 XDIEFENBAKER-- BRITISH COLUMBIA CONNECTIONS
132 ANY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE FEDERAL PARTIES 133 WHICH FEDERAL PARTTES MOST ALIKE 134 WAICH FEDERAL PARTIES LEAST ALXKE 135 DOES IT MATTER WHICH PARTY RUNS THE COUNTRY
R'S CONCEPT OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA
136 XOUT OF DATE/MODERN-IDEAL PARTY 137 XCOMPETENT/INCOMPETENT-IDEAL PARTY 138 XPOWERFUL/WEAK-IDEAL PARTY 139 XFOOLISH/UTSE-IDEAL PARTY 140 XFOR MIDDLE CLASS/FOR WORKING CLASS-IDEAL PARTY 141 XUNITED/SPLIT-IDEAL PARTY 142 XBAD/GOOD-IDEAL PARTY 143 XLEFT/RIGHT-IDEAL PARTY 144 XSTRONG-MINDED/WEAK-MINDED-IDEAL PARTY 145 XHONEST/DISHONEST-IDEAL PABTY 146 XDULL/EXCITING-IDEAL PARTY 147 XYOUNG/OLD-IDEAL PARTY 148 XSLOW/FAST-IDEAL PARTY
149 150 151 152 153
154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161
R'S CHOICE OF PRIME MINISTER
R'S CONCEPT OF LIBERAL PARTY
XOUT OF DATE/MODERN-LIBERAL PARTY XCOMPETENT/INCOMPETENT-LIBERAL PARTY XPOWERFUL/YEAK-LIBERAL PARTY XFOOLISH/WISE-LIBERAL PARTY XFOR MIDDLE CLASS/FOR WORKING CLASS-LIBERAL PARTY XUNITED/SPLIT-LIBERAL PARTY XBAD/GOOD-LIBERAL PARTY XLEFT/RIGHT-LIBERAL PARTY XSTAONG-MINDED/WEAK-HINDED-LIBERAL PARTY XHONEST/DISHONEST-LIBERAL PARTY XDULL,'EXCITING-LIBERAL PARTY XYOUNG/OLD-LIBERAL PARTY XSLOW/FAST-LIBERAL PARTY
59
60 61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
CONTENTS
VARIABLE VARIABLE NAME PAGE N u M B E R NO.
162 163 164 165 166
167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174
XOUT OF DATE/MODERN-CONSERVATIVE PARTY XCOMPETENT/INCOMPETENT-CONSERVATIVE PARTY XPOWERFUL/BEAK-CONSERVATIYE PARTY XFOOLISH/WISE-CONSERVATIVE PARTY XFOR MIDDLE CLASS/FOR WORKING CLASS-CONSERVA- TIVE PARTY XUNITED/SPLIT-CONSERVATIVE PARTY XBAD/GOOD-CONSERVATIVE PARTY XLEFT/RIGHT-CONSERVATIVE PARTY XSTRONG-MINDED/WEAK-HINDED-CONSERVATIVE PARTY XHONEST/DISHONEST-CONSERVATIVE PARTY XDlJLL/EXCITING-CONSERVATIVE PARTY XYOUNG/OLD-CONSERVATIVE PARTY XSLOR/PAST-CONSERVATIVE PARTY
R'S CONCEPT OF NEW DEMOCRATIC PARTY
175 XOUT OF DATE/MODERN-NDP PARTY 176 XCOMPETENT/INCOMPETENl'-NDP PARTY 177 XPOWERPUL/NEAK-NDP PARTY 178 XFOOLISH/WISE-NDP PARTY 173 XFOR MIDDLE CLASS/FOR WORKING CLASS-NDP PARTY 190 XUNITED/SPLIT-NDP PARTY Ial XBAD/GOOD-NDP PARTY 182 XLEF'T/RIGHT-NDP PARTY 183 XSTRONG-MINDED/WEAK-MINDED-NDP PARTY 184 XHONEST/DISHONEST-NDP PARTY 1a5 XDULL/EXCITING-NDP PARTY 186 XYOUNG/OLD-NDP PARTY 187 XSLOU/FAST-NDP PARTY
R'S CONCEPT OF SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY
1’38 189 190 191 192
193 194 195 196 197
XOUT OF DATE/MODERN-SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY XCOMPETENT/INCOMPETENT-SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY XPOWERFUL/ilEAK-SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY XFOOLISH/UISE-SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY XFOR MIDDLE CLASS/FOR WORKING CLASS-SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY XUNITED/SPLIT-SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY XBAD/GOOD-SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY XLEFT/RIGHT-SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY XSTRONG-MINDED/WEAK-MXNDED-SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY XHONEST/DISHONEST-SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY
R'S CONCEPT OF CONSERVATIVE PARTY
73
74
75
76
77
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
CONTENTS
VARIABLE VARIABLE NAME NUMBER
198 XDULL/EXCXTING-SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY 199 XYOUNG/OLD -SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY 200 XSLOW/FAST-SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY
201 202 203 204 205
206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213
214 215 216 217 218
219
220
221 R'S PARTY IDENTIPICATION 222 XSTRENGTH OF R'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION 223 XR EVER CLOSER TO ANOTHER PARTY 224 XCHOSEN PARTY ID-NATIONAL/PROVINCIAL LEVEL 225 X(IF NATIONAL), R'S PROVINCIAL PARTY ID 226 X(IP PROVINCIAL), R'S NATXONAL PARTY ID 227 X(NON-ID), CLOSER TO ANY PARTY 228 XCHOSEN CLOSER PARTY-NATIONAL/PROVINCIAL LEVEL
R'S CONCEPT OF CREDITISTE PARTY
XOUT OF DATE/MODERN-CREDITISTE PARTY XCOMPETENT/INCOMPETENT-CREDITISTE PARTY XPOAERFUL/WEAK-CREDITISTE PARTY XFOOLISH/WISE-CREDITISTE PARTY XFOR MIDDLE CLASS/FOR WORKING CLASS-CREDITISTE PARTY XUNITED/SPLIT-CREDTTISTE PARTY XBAD/GOOD-CREDITISTE PARTY XLEPT,'RIGHT-CREDITISTE PARTY XSTRDNG-MINDED/WEAK-MINDED-CREDITISTE PARTY XHONFST/DISHONEST-CREDITISTE PARTY XDULL/EXCITING-CREDITISTE PARTY XYOUNG/OLD-CREDITISTE PARTY XSLOU,'FAST-CREDITISTE PARTY
PERFORMANCE OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT: R'S EVALUATIONS
ACTIONS OF LIBERAL MP'S-R'S EVALUATIONS ACTIONS OF CONSERVATIVE MP'S-R'S EVALUATIONS ACTIONS OF NDP MP'S-R'S EVALUATIONS ACTIONS OF SOCIAL CREDIT MP'S-R'S EVALUATIONS ACTIONS OF CAOUETTE'S GROUP IN PARLIAMENT-R'S EVALUATIONS
(QUEBEC ONLY) HAS CAOUETTE'S SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY DONE BETTER THAN OTHERS X(QUEBEC ONLY) CHANCES CAOUETTE'S SOCIAL CREDIT COME TO POWER IN 10 YEARS
R'S PAST AND PRESENT PARTY IDENTIFICATXON
PAGE NO.
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
CONTENTS
VARKABLE VARIABLE NAME PAGE NUMBER NO,
229 X(IF NATIONAL), PARTY CLOSE TO IN PROVINCE 102 230 X(IF PROVINCIAL), PARTY CLOSE TO AT FEDERAL LEVEL 231 X(NON-ID), EVER CLOSER TO ANOTHER PARTY 103 232 X(N0 ID), R EVER FEEL CLOSE TO A PARTY 105 233 XWHEN DID R CHANGE PARTY AFFILIATION 234 XWHY R CHANGED PARTY AFPILIATION 106 235 R'S SECOND CHOICE OF FEDERAL PARTIES 107 236 WHICH FEDERAL PARTY R NANTS LEAST TO VOTE FOR
237
23%
239
240 FATHER'S INTEREST IN POLLITICS 241 XFATHER'S PARTY PREFERENCE 242 MOTHER'S INTEREST IN POLITICS 243 XMOTHER'S PARTY PREFERENCE
244
245
246
247
248
249
250 251 252 253
R'S VOTING DECISIONS
PARTY, LEADER OR CANDIDATE-WHICH MOST IMPORTANT CRXTERION FOR VOTE DECISION 108 VOTE ALLEGIANCE TO PARTY IF BAD CONSTITUENCY CANDIDATE VOTE ALLEGIANCE TO PARTY IF IT FAVORS BAD POLICIES 109
R'S PARENTS POLITICAL INTEREST E IDENTIFICATION
170
R'S KNOWLEDGE OF THE CANDIDATES
R KNOW NAME OF CANDIDATE WINNING IN CONSTITUENCY 111 R KNOW PARTY OF CANDIDATE WINNING IN CONSTITUENCY R READ/HEARD ABOUT CANDIDATE WINNING IN CONSTITUENCY 112 XWHAT DID R READ/HEAR ABOUT CANDIDATE WINNING IN CONSTITUENCY WAS WINNING CANDIDATE AN INCUMBENT IN R'S CONSTITUENCY 113 {IF 1NCUMBENT)HA.S CANDIDATE DONE ANYTHING FOR CONSTITUENCY (TF 1NCUMBENT)HAS CANDIDATE DONE ANYTHING FOR R DOES R REMEMBER NAMES OF ANY OTHER CANDIDATES 114 DOES R REMEMBER PARTY OF ANY OTHER CANDIDATES DOES R READ/HEAR ANYTHING ABOUT OTHER CANDIDATES 115
VARIABLE NIJMBER
254 255
256
257
258
259
260 261
262 263 264 , 265 266 267 268
269 270
271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282
CONTENTS
VARIABLE NAME
R'S PAST VOTING BEHAVIOR
HOW OFTEN R HAS VOTED IN PAST FEDERAL ELECTIONS XHAS R VOTED FOR SAME PARTY IN PAST FEDERAL ELECTIONS XWHICH SANE PARTY R HAS VOTED FOR IN PAST FEDERAL ELECTIONS HOW OFTEN R HAS VOTED IN FAST PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS XHAS R VOTED FOR SAME PARTY IN PAST PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS XWHICH SAME PARTY R HAS VOTED FOR IN PAST PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS
(QUEBEC ONLY) R'S VOTE IN 1962 R'S VOTE IN 1963
1965 VOTING BEHAVIOR
R'S VOTE IN 1965 XWHEN R DECIDED 1965 VOTE Xl965 VOTE DECISION EASY/NOT EASY XWHY 1965 VOTE DECISION NOT EASY XR USED HELP TO CAST 1965 BALLOT XWHY R CHANGED VOTE FROM 1963 TO 1965 XANY SPECIAL REASON FOR 1965 VOTE
R ATTENDED ANY POLITICAL MEETINGS XHOW MANY POLITICAL MEETINGS R ATTENDED 126 R READ ANY SPEECHES OR LEAFLETS ANY PARTIES CALLED ON R 128 XCONSERVATIVE PARTY CALLED ON R XLIBERAL PARTY CALLED ON R 129 XNDP CALLED ON R XSOCIAL CREDIT PARTY CALLED ON R 130 XOTHER PARTY CALLED ON R DID R PERSONALLY HELP ANY CANDIDATE 131 DID R TRY TO INFLUENCE OTHERS R BELONG TO ANY POLITICAL ORGANIZATION
VARIABLE VARIABLE NAME PAGE NUMBER NO.
POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND FINANCES: R'S OPINIONS
283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292
R KNOW OF ANY FUND RAISING DID R ASK ANYONE FOR CONTRIBUTION WAS R/FAMILY MEMBER ASKED FOR CONTRIBUTION XWHO WAS ASKED FOR CONTRIBUTION-R/FARILY MEMBER XCONSERVATIVES ASKED FOR MONEY XLIBERALS ASKED FOR MONEY XNDP ASKED FOR MONEY
132
133
134
XSOCIAL CREDIT PARTY ASKED FOR MONEY XOTHER PARTY ASKED FOR MONEY BANNER IN WHICH R HAS APPROACRED FOR POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
135
293 294 295 296
DID R KNOW CANVASSER PERSONALLY WHICH PARTY DID R CONTRIBUTE TO DID ANY OTHER FAMILY MEflBER GIVE TO PARTY IF R HAD BEEN ASKED, NOULD HAVE GIVEN POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
136
137
297 298
WOULD R PREFER TO DONATE TIME OR HONEY TO PARTY R'S OPINION OF BUSINESS AND UNION POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS
138
299 SHOULD POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION BE TAX DEDUCTIBLE 300 SHOULD PARTIES PUBLISH CABPAFGN EXPENSES 301 SHOULD PARTIES DISCLOSE THEIR CONTRIBUTORS 302 SHOULD PARTIES DISCLOSE AMOUNTS CONTRIBUTED 303 SHOULD GOV'T PAY CAMPAIGN EXPENSES
139
140
PERSONAL DATA
304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315
R'S HARITAL STATUS IDENTITY OF FAMILY'S MAIN PROVIDER EAIN EARNER'S OCCUPATION R'S EDUCATION R'S PERCEIVED SOCIAL CLASS R'S RELIGION XR'S CHURCH ATTENDANCE COUNTRY OF R'S ANCESTORS R'S COUNTRY OF BIRTH XYEAR R IMMIGRATED TO CANADA LANGUAGE MOST OFTEN SPOKEN AT HOME SIZE OF PLACE WHERE R GRER UP
141
142
143
144
145
146
NUMBER
R'S MOBILITY
316 R EVER LIVE IN ANOTHER PROVINCE 317 XNEWFOUNDLAND-MOBILITY 318 XPRINCE EDBARD ISLAND-NOBILITY 319 XNOVA SCOTIA-MOBILITY 320 XNEW BRUNSWICK-MOBILITY 321 XQUEBEC-MOBILITY 322 XONTARIO-MOBILITY 323 XMANITOBA-MOBILITY 324 XSASKATCHEWAN-MOBILITY 325 XALBERTA-MOBILITY 326 XBRITISH COLUMBIA-MOBILITY
R'S GROUP ASSOCIATIONS
327 XR BELONG TO LABOR UNION 328 XR BELONG TO TRADE ASSOCIATION 329 XR BELONG TO FARM ORGANIZATION 330 XR BELONG TO PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 331 XR BELONG TO OTHER VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATION
332
333
334
(QUEBEC ONLY) HAS R VISITED ANOTHER'S HOME LAST WEEK X(QUEBEC ONLY) HAVE OTHERS VISITED R AT HOBE DURING LAST WEEK X(QUEBEC ONLY) HAS R BEEN OUT WITH OTHERS DURING LAST WEEK
335 R'S AGE 336 FAMILY INCOME GROUP 337 R'S SEX
CONTENTS
VARIABLE VARIABLE NAME
QUESTIONNAIRE SECTION
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION QUEST :ONNAIRE 159
PAGE NO.
147
148
149
150
152
153
154
155
156
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 1
VAR 0001 REP 0001 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-ICPR STUDY NUMBER-7225 NO RISSING DATA CODES
LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DK 1COL l-4
STUDY NURBER (7225) *~I~.......~...~...
VAR 0002 REP 0002 DATA SET ID-'72251 NANE-INTERVIEW NUBBER NO MISSING DATA CODES
LOC 5 RIDTH 5 DK 1 COL 5- 9
RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
THE FIRST DIGIT IDENTIFIES TBE PROVINCE AS CODED IN VARIABLE FIVE; THE NEXT FOUR DIGITS ARE THE RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUHBER WITHIN THE PROVINCE. ALL FIVE DIGITS ARE NEEDED TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY A RESPONDENT. ..-........_._...........-............-..-.........-....-...
VAR 0003 REP 0003 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAHE-INTEGER AEIGAT VARIABLE NO HISSING DATA CODES
LOC 10 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 10
INTEGER WEIGHT VALUES
RESPONDENTS WERE UEIGHTED ACCORDING TO THEIR CONSTITUENCY OF RESIDENCE. ALL SUBJECTS LIVING IN CONSTITUENCY #049 (ALGOBA WEST, ONTARIO) THROUGH to80 (YENTYORTH, ONTAEIO) YERE UEIGHTED BY A FACTOR OF ONE AND ONE-THIRD. RESIDENTS OF tO40 (CARTIER, QUEBEC) TBRU lo46 (SAINT-JACQUES, QUEBEC) (INCLUSIVE), to81 (YORK CENTRE, ONTARIO) THRIJ to88 (ROSEDALE, ONTARIO), AND ALL RESPONDENTS FEOH BRITISH COLURBIA UERE DOUBLE UEIGHTED. THE REST OF TBE CONSTITUENCIES ARE UNUEIGHTED. SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 4 AND 6.
TAE FREQUENCIES REPORTED POE THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT UNYEIGHTED (RAW) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUNBER OF DATA CASES. . . . ..*.*.....*.....-..-..........-.-.--.......*....-.-......
1113 3. UNWEIGUTED CASES 588 4. REIGHTED ONE AND ONE-TAIRD (CONSTITUENCIES #049-tO80) 417 6. DOUBLE WEIGHTED (CONSTITUENCIES tOUO-C048, t081-
t088, AND #ill-tll8)
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 2
VAR 0004 REF 0004 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAilE-DECIMAL UEIGHT VARIABLE NO BISSING DATA CODES
LOC 11 UIDTH 3 DK 1 COL 11-13 2 DEC PLACE(S)
DECIHAL WEIGHT VALUES PLEASE SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 3 AND 6.
THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT UNBEIGHTED (RAU) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUHBER OF DATA CASES.
<TWO DECIMAL PLACES ARE IHPLIED> . . ..-_.......*...................--...-............--...-.
1113 100. UNUEIGHTED CASES 508 133. WEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES
VAR 0005 REP 0005 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-PROVINCE OF INTERVIEW NO HISSING DATA CODES
LOC 14 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 15
72 219 324
72 2391 3162
390 282 513 760
PROVINCE .- . . . . . .
0. 1. 2. 3.
2: 6. 7. 0. 9.
PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND NOVA SCOTIA NEY BRUNSWICK NEYFOUNDLAND QUEBEC ONTARIO BANITOBA SASKATCHEWAN ALBERTA BRITISH COLUNBIA
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 3
VAR 0006 REF 0006 DATA SET ID-'72251 NASE-R'S CONSTITUENCY NO KISSING DATA CODES
LOC 15 UIDTH 3 DK 1 COL 16-18
RESPONDENT'S CONSTITUENCY CONSTITUENCIES ARE NUHBERED CONSECUTIVELY, BEGINNING KITH 001 (ST. JOHN'S WEST, NEWFOUNDLAND) THROUGH 116 (VICTORIA, BRITISH COLUMBIA). THE CONSTITUENCY IS THE BASIS FOR DETERMINING THE RESPONDENT'S VALUE IN TRE WEIGHT VARIABLES. SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 3 AND 4. *...........*...*._.........*....-.-.....--.--.....-.*....
NEW POUNDLAND
42 001. ST. JOHN'S REST 30 002. ST. JOHN'S EAST
NOVA SCOTIA
30 003. CAPE BRITON NORTH AND VICTORIA 63 004. COLCHESTER-BANTS 30 005. CUMBERLAND 96 006. HALIFAX
PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND
72 007. KINGS
NEW BRUNSWICK
63 000. CHARLOTTE 66 009. NORTHUKBERLAND-MIRANICHI 42 010. RESTIGOUCHE-EADAUASKA 40 011. ROYAL 39 012. SAINT JOHN-ALBERT 66 013. WESTNORLAND
52 049. ALGOHA WEST 60 050. BRANTFOED 92 051. BRANT-HALDIBAND 72 052. BRUCE 00 053. CARLETON 76 054. DURHAB 40 055. ESSEX EAST
116 056. ESSEX SOUTH 44 057. ESSEX VEST 48 058. HANILTON SOUTH
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 5
Y”b 72 80 76 56 60 84 88 72 76 76 88 68
104 80 76 60 88 84 8d 4.3
108 96
228 150
24 90 72 42
059. HAHILTON WEST 060. HASTINGS-FRONTENAC 061. LANBTON-KENT 062. LONDON 063. RIDDLESEX EAST 064. NIAGARA FALLS 065. NICKEL BELT 066. NORFOLK 067. ONTARIO 068. PEEL 069. PERTH 070. PETERBOROUGH 071. PORT ARTHUR 072. PRINCE EDWARD LENNOX 073. RENFREY SOUTH 074. RUSSELL 075. STOREONT 076. SUDBURY 077. WELLAND 078. WELLINGTON-HURON 079. WELLINGTON-SOUTH 080. WENTUORTH 081. YORK CENTRE 002. YORK HUlBER 083. YORK SCARBOROUGH 084. YORK VEST 085. BROADVIEY 086, EGLINTON 087. PARKDALE 088. ROSEDALE
MANITOBA
54 33 57 57 42
z': 42
089. BRANDON-SOURIS 090. PORTAGE-NEEPAWA 091. ST, BONIFACE 092. SPRINGFIELD 093. YINNIPEG RORTH 094. WINNIPEG YORTH CENTRE 095. WINNIPEG SOUTH 096. WINNIPEG SOUTH CENTRE
SASKATCHEYAN
66 097. HOOSE HOUNTAIN 54 098. QU'APPELLE
(CONTINUED) .-.I......*
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 6
(CONTINUED) . . . ..s.....
48 099. EEGINA CITY 6 100. ROSETOWN-BIGGAR
42 101. ROSTHERN 66 102. SASKATOON
ALBERTA
69 103. BOW RIVER 63 104. CALGARY NORTH 66 105. CALGARY SOUTH 5u 106. EDMONTON EAST
117 107. EDflONTON-STRATHCONA 39 108. EDMONTON-UEST 42 109. MEDICINE HAT 63 110. RED DEER
90 114. NEU WESTNINSTER 60 115. VANCOUVER CENTRE 78 116. VANCOUVER EAST
11u 117. VANCOUVER QUADRA 96 1 la- VICTORIA
VAR 0007 REF 0007 1IAME-SIZE OF PLACE MD=GE 99
LOC 18 YIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 19-20
DATA SET ID-'7225'
SIZE OF PLACE
(SUBURBS UERE DEFINED AS PLACES PHYSICALLY COTERRINOUS YITH CITIES OR SO CLOSE AS TO BE PART OF ONE URBAN AREA.) _.._...........-.__-..-..............-...*.....-.
1110 01. CITY 500,000 AND OVER 635 02. SUBURB OF CITY 500,000 AND OVER 866 11. CITY 250,000-499,999 378 12. SUBURB OF CITY 250,000-499,999 540 21. CITY 100,000-249.999
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 7
(CONTINUED) - . . . . . . I I . .
110 598 961 764
1196 995
22. SUBURB OF CITY lOO,OOO-249,999 31. CITY SO,OOO-99,999 UO. TOWN lO,OOO-49,999 50. TOWN 2500-9,999 60. VILLAGE UNDER 2500 70. RURAL ROUTE ADDRESS; HENTION OF COONTY
ONLY: NO STREET ADDRESS AND FARiY OCCUPATION.
40 99. N.A.
VAR 0008 REP 0008 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-ClOST IMP PBES FOR CANADA BD=GE 90 HULT BESPS 2
LOC 20 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 21-24
Q. 1. YOU HEAR A LOT ABOUT THE PROBLEES FACING THE COUNTRY TODAY AND ME ARE INTERESTED IN GETTING OPINIONS ON THESE FROE YOU. IN YOOR OPINION YBAT PROBLEMS FACING THE COUNTRY ARE MOST IHPORTANT? . . . . ..-.........._....*-.-..........................---....
ECONOKIC PROBLEHS
1898
623
302
1506 254
11. TALXES, INFLATION, PRICES, HIGH COST OF LIVING, LOU SALARIES, POVERTY
12. CORKERCE, TRADE, ECONOEIC AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPHENT, NATURAL RESOURCES, FINANCE, PUBLIC DEBT, BONETARY POLICY.
13. OTHERS (GENERAL RUBRICS SUCH AS TEE ECONOKY, ECONOBIC SITUATION)
14. UNEMPLOYMENT AND AUTOHATION. 15. AGRICULTURAL PROBLEM.
SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAHS
874 74
603 194 889
16. OLD AGE PENSION AND PENSION PLAN 17. FAKILY ALLOWANCES 18. HEALTH, YELPARE AND BEDICARE.
11. TAXES, INFLATION, PRICES, HIGH COST OF LIVING, LOW SALARIES, POVERTY.
12. COMMERCE. TRADE, ECONONIC AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPBENT, NATURAL RESOURCES, FINANCE, PUBLIC DEBT, PIONETAEY POLICY.
13. OTHERS (GENERAL RUBRICS SUCH AS THE ECONOHY, ECONOUIC SITUATION)
14. UNEKPLOYRENT AND AUTOflATION. 15. AGRICULTURAL PROBLEBS.
SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAPIS
RELIGIOUS AND MORAL PROBLEHS
FOREIGN RELATIONS
23. U.S.A. RELATIONS (INCLUDES SPECIFIC PROBLEH OF U.S. ECONOBIC INFLUENCE)
24. COBHUNISH 25. WAR, DEFENCE, NUCLEAR THREAT, VIET NAR. 26. OTHERS (SUCH AS FOREIGN AID, ETC.)
POLITICAL PROBLECLS
27. ETHNIC RELATIONS, BILINGUAL C BICULTURAL SEPARATXSl'¶ 28. NATIONAL UNITY AND IDENTITY. 29. FEDERAL PROVINCIAL RELATIONS. 30. SAJORITY GOVERNHENT. 31. LACK OF STABILITY AND/OR LEADERSHIP IN GOVERNRENT. 32. PARTY STRUCTURE OR SYSTEM. 33. PUBLIC ADtlINISTRATION (UASTE OF TAXES, ETC.) 34. CORRUPTION AND SCANDAL. 35. SOCIALISM. 36. OTHERS (OR GENERALLY).
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 10
(CONTINUED) ..-.-......
SOCIAL PROBLEHS
84 37. INNIGRATION, INDIANS, RACE RELATIONS (B AND iv'). 40 38. CAPITAL PUNISHf',ENT. 65 39. LABOUR-HANAGEHENT PROBLEHS, STRIKES.
168 40. OTHERS.
237 Bl. ALL OTHER PROBLENS.
45 90. IRRELEVANT, NO SPECIAL PROBLEB. 68 91. INAP.; CODED 90 IN FIRST RESP. REP. NO. 8.
7062 92. NO SECOND NENTION 1680 99. NO ANSYER, DON'T KNOW
VAR 0010 REF 0010 NAPIE-R'S FLGS ABT ELCTN RSLTS HD=O
LOC 28 uIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 29
DATA SET ID-'72251
3373
367 1522
347 214 424
96
293 769
Q. 3-A. AS YOU KNOW ON NOVEMBER THE ~TH YE HAD A FEDERAL ELECTION. PEOPLE ARE TALKING A LOT ABOUT THIS ELECTION AND HOW IT TURNED OUT. DO YOU HAPPEN TO HAVE ANY FEELINGS ABOUT HOW THE ELECTION TURNED OUT? . . . . . . . ..I. - . . . . . . . .._1-...........-..-.*.........-......
1. DISPLEASED BECAUSE ELECTION USELESS OR UNWARRANTED (ANSWERS SUCH AS "YE SHOULDN'T HAVE HAD IT," IT'S A UASTE OF MONEY v OR "IT CHANGES NOTHING"); OR DISPLEASED BECAUSE NO MAJORITY OBTAINED
2. DISPLEASED BECAUSE HIS PARTY LOST. 3. DISPLEASED (NO SPECIFIC REASON GIVEN OR REASON
OTHER THAN ABOVE)
NEUTRAL FEELINGS.
4. A. EXPECTED THE RESULTS. 5. B. INDIFFERENCE (DOESN'T CARE HOU IT CAME OUT) 6. C. FEELINGS UNKNOHN (IRRELEVANT ANSWERS THAT
DON'T INDICATE RESPONDENT'S FEELINGS) 7. D. OTHERS (ANSWERS THAT DON'T GIVE THE RESPONDENT'S
FEELINGS BUT THAT ARE NOT IRRELEVANT.)
PLEASED BECAUSE TRIS PARTY UON. PLEASED (NO SPECIFIC REASON GIVEN OR REASON OTAEE THAN ABOVE)
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 11
(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . ..-
780 0. DON'T
NOTE: 1. ABBIGUITY
KNOW, NO OPINION, REFUSE, ETC.
IN THE QUESTION CAUSED ROST RESPONDENTS FEELINGS ABOUT THE "FEDERAL ELECTION," TO GIVE THEIR
E.G. "WE SHOULDN'T HAVE HAD IT" AND ONLY A HINORITY GAVE THEIR FEELINGS ABOUT THE RESULTS OF THE FEDERAL ELECTION.
VAR 0011 REP 0011 DATA SET ID-'7225' NANE-XF'S REASON PR OPINION ND=0
LOC 29 UXDTH 1 DR 1 COL 30
Q. 3-B. CAN YOU TELL BE SOHETHING BORE ABOUT WRY YOU FEEL THAT UAY <ABOUT THE ELECTION RESULTS>? (THE ANSWERS TO 3-A AND 3-B HAVE BEEN COHBINED IN REP- NO. 10 UNLESS THE RESPONDENT GAVE A DISTINCT ANSWER TO 3-B.) . . . ..-._........._...-.-...........-.....-.........-..--
319 1.
36 2. 197 3.
DISPLEASED BECAUSE ELECTION USELESS OR ONUARRANTED (ANSWERS SUCB AS "WE SHOULDN'T HAVE HAD IT," "IT'S A WASTE OF MONEY" OR "IT CHANGES NOTHING”): OR DISPLEASED BECAUSE NO HAJORITY OBTAINED. DISPLEASED BECAUSE HIS PARTY LOST. DISPLEASED (NO SPECIFIC REASON GIVEN OR REASON OTHER THAN ABOVE).
NEUTRAL FEELINGS.
14 4. 7 5.
34 6.
21 7.
A. EXPECTED TRE RESULTS. 8. INDIFFERENCE (DOESN'T CARE HOY IT CAHE OUT). C. FEELINGS UNKNOWN (IRRELEVANT ANSYERS THAT DON'T
INDICATE RESPOBDENT'S FEELINGS) D. OTHERS (ANSWERS THAT DON'T GIVE TAE RESPONDENT'S
FEELINGS BUT THAT ARE NOT IRRELEVANT)
47 75
a. 9.
0.
PLEASED BECAUSE HIS PARTY YON PLEASED (NO SPECIFIC REASON GIVEU OR REASON OTHER THAN ABOVE).
6843 DON'T KNOU, NO OPINION, REFDSE, NO CODABLE OPINION.
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 12
VAR 0012 REF 0012 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAME-WCH GOVT HANDLES PBMS HD=GE 8
LOC 30 UIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 31
Q. 4-A. THINKING NOW OF THE MOST IHPOETANT PROBLEHS FACING CANADA TODAY, WHICH GOVERNMENT WOULD YOU SAY HANDLES IIOST OF THESE, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN OTTAWA OR THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS? ._._...............................-...-....-........-....--
3901 1. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 1449 2. PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS 1934 3. BOTH HANDLE THEM
209 4. NEITHER
691 8. DK 9 9. N-A..
VAR 0013 REP 0013 NAME-ANY PVNL GOVT HORE PURFL MD=GE 8
LOC 31 WIDTH 1 DK 1 CDL 32
DATA SET ID-'72251
Q. 4-B. ARE ANY PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS MORE POWERFUL THAN OTHERS? ..1..__.1.._.._....-..-..............-.--.....-....-......
4785 1. YES 1629 2. NO
1779 8, DK, IF ANY ARE MORE POWERFUL
VAR 0014 REP 0014 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XNEWPOUNDLAND POYEBFUL? MD=0 OR GE 0
1246 1. R HENTIONS BRITISH COLUBBIA AS BORE POWERFUL 3469 5. R DOES NOT BENTION BRITISH COLUHBIA
66 8. YES, SOBE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS BORE POYERPUL, BUT DK WHICH PROVINCES ARE BORE POWERFUL
4 9. REF. NOS. 14-23 N.A. 3408 0. INAP.: CODED 2 OR 8 IN REP. NO. 13
VAR 0024 REF 0024 NANE-LVL GOVT MOST IflP TO R HD=GE 8
LOC 42 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 43
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 5. AS PAR AS YOU ARE CONCERNED PERSONALLY, YHICH GOVERNNENT IS HORE IMPORTANT IN AFFECTING HOY YOU AND YOUR FAMILY GET ON? THE ONE IN OTTAWA OR THE ONE IN THIS PROVINCE? _.-.-.........__..__.............-.--.-.--........-.......
VAR 0025 REP 0025 DATA SET IO-'7225' NAKE-IBP ISSUES IN ELECTION ID=GE 90 KULT RESPS 2
LOC 43 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 44-47
Q. 6. DURING TRIS ELECTION PEOPLE HAD DIFFERENT OPINIOI!S ABOUT THE ISSUES YiiICH WERE IHPORTANT IN THE CAHPAIGN. YE ARE INTERESTED IN HEARING XOUR OPIWION ABOUT YHAT YOU THOUGHT HERE THE HOST IRPORTANT ISSUES IN THE LAST ELECTION. ..-...-.......-..-...............-..-.-..............-.-.
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 17
(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . . . .
SOCIAL SECURITY ISSUES
2664 11. OLD AGE PENSION AND PENSION PLAN. 175 12. FAMILY ALLOWANCE.
1267 13. HEALTH AND WELFARE AND MEDICARE. 199 14. OTHERS (OR GENERALLY). 391 15. CORRUPTION AND SCANDAL IN GOVERNBENT. 149 16. AGRICULTURAL ISSUES.
403
226 128
ECONOHIC ISSUES
289 20.
175 21.
80 22.
438 23. 892 24. 235 25.
62 26. 27 27.
540 28.
TAXES, INFLATION, PRICES, SALARIES, COST OF LIVING, POVERTY. COBHERCE, TRADE, ECONOHIC AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, ETC. OTHERS AND GENERAL RUBRICS SUCH AS, "THE ECONOHY" AND "THE ECONOBIC SITUATION" UNEBPLOYMENT AND AUTOHATION. HAJORITY GOVERNHENT. EDUCATIONAL ISSUES. LACK OF LEADERSHIP IN GOVERNHENT. LACK OF STABILITY IN GOVERNHENT. OTHERS.
487 90. IRRELEVANT OR REFUSES, ETC- 5195 92. NO SECOND RESPONSE 2364 99. NO ANSWER OR "NO IHPORTANT ISSUES"
NATIONAL UNITY AND IDENTITY ISSUES
17. ETHNIC RELATIONS, SEPARATISM, QUEBEC, BILINGUALISM AND BICULTURALISH.
18. FLAG. 19. U.S.A. INFLUENCE OR INTERFERENCE,
FEDERAL-PROVINCIAL RELATIONS, CANADIAN NATIONALISH.
VAR 0026 REP 0026 DATA SET ID-'7225' NANE-SCL ULPR ISQS-IHPC ELCN BD=GE 8
LOC 47 YIOTH 1 OK 1 COL 48
NOW I AH GOING TO READ YOU SOBE OF TRE ISSUES WHICH UERE DISCUSSED IN THE LAST ELECTION CABPAIGN AND I UOULD LIKE YOU TO TELL HE, FOR EACH ISSUE BOW IHPORTANT IT HAS TO YOU PERSONALLY IN AELPING YOU DECIDE HOW TO VOTE.
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 18
(CONTINUED) .*..I...-.*
3211 2023 2740
182 37
VAR 0027 REP 0027 DATA SET ID-'72251
Q. 7-A. TAKE SOCIAL WELFARE ISSUES, LIKE HEALTH INSURANCE AND PENSIONS, HOX INPORTANT WAS THAT TO YOU IN DECIDING HOU TO VOTE? VERY IBPORTANT, FAIRLY IHPORTANT, OR NOT TOO IHPORTANT? .*.._..........**_.....-........-....-....-...........-..-.
1: VERY IBPORTANT FAIRLY INPORTANT
3. NOT TOO IKPOATANT
8. DK 9. NA
NAME-ECONOMIC ISUS-IEPC ELCN BD=GE 8 LOC 48 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 49
4120 2118 1625
299 31
VAR 0028 REP 0028
2513 1. VERY INPORTANT 1750 2. FAIRLY IBPORTANT 3662 3. NOT TOO IMPORTANT
Q. 7-B. HOW ABOUT ISSUES CONCERNING THE ECONOBY, SUCK AS UNEHPLOYRENT, GOVERNXENT PLANNING FOR TBE FUTURE, FOREIGN TRADE <HOW IXPORTANT HAS THAT TO YOU IN DECIDING HOW TO VOTE>? . . . ..-....-........_........*.....-...*.-.....-...**-....
1. VERY IHPORTANT 2. FAIRLY IBPORTANT 3. NOT TOO IBPORTANT
8. DK 9. NA
DATA SET ID-'7225 NAKE-ENGLH-FN ISUS-IIPC ELCN no=GE 8
LOC 49 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 50
Q. 7-C. NOW THINK OF THE ISSUE OF RELATIONS BETUEEN PEENCF AND ENGLISH-SPEAKING CANADIANS. WAS THIS VERY IBPORTANT, FAIRLY IMPORTANT, OR NOT TOO IMPORTANT TO YOU <IN DECIDING HOW TO VOTE>? . . . . . . . . . ..~.........~........~.......-~.........-.*...-.-
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 19
(CONTINUED) .--1-e . . . . .
208 8. DK 60 9. NA
VAB 0029 REP 0029 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-FLAG ISSUE-IbPORTNC ELCN fiD=GE 0
LOC 50 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 51
Q. 7-D. IN DECIDING HOW TO VOTE, DID YOU PEEL THAT THE CANADIAN FLAG ISSUE WAS VERY IHPORTANT, PAIRLY IHPORTANT OR NOT TOO IMPORTANT? . . . . . . . . ..*1.......*....*...............................--.
1672 1. VERY IMPORTANT 1288 2. FAIRLY IHPOETANT 5028 3. NOT TOO IBPOBTANT
153 8. DK 52 9. NA
VAR 0030 REP 0030 NAME-CANADIAN UNITY-IHPC ELCN HD=GE 8
DATA SET ID-'7225'
LOC 51 YIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 52
4131 1958 1707
343 54
VAR 0031 REP 0031 NAME-GOVT CORRUPTN-IHPC ELCN BD=GE 8
LOC 52 UIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 53
Q. 7-E. WHAT ABOUT THE UNITY OF CANADA? UAS THIS AN ISSUE WHICH YOU POUND VERY IMPORTANT. FAIRLY IBPORTANT, OR NOT TOO IRPORTANT <IN DECIDING HOI TO VOTE>? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-................................-........
I, VERY IMPORTANT 2. PAIRLY IRPORTANT 3. NOT TOO IHPORTANT
8. DK 9. NA
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q- 7-F. YAS CORRUPTION IN GOVERNHENT AN ISSUE YHICA YOU
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 20
3100 1660 2378
410 45
PAR 0032 REF 0032 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-NAJORITY GOVT ISSUE-XNPC ID=GE 8
LOC 53 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 54
(CONTINUED) . . ..I......
POUND VERY IRPORTANT, FAIRLY IHPORTANT, OR NOT TOO IHPORTANT <IN DECIDING HOW TO VOTE>? . . . . . . . ..~.....--......................-...-....--
1. VERY IHPORTANT 2. FAIRLY IMPORTANT 3. NOT TOO IMPORTANT
8. DK 9. NA
Q. 7-G. HOW IMPORTANT <IN DECIDING HOW TO VOTE> DID YOU PIND THE ISSUE OF WHETHER CANADA SHOULD HAVE A RAJORITY GOVERNRENT? . ..--...~....-...-.......................-*......-.-~...
4637 1. VERY INPORTANT 1513 2. FAIRLY IRPORTANT 1641 3. NOT TOO INPORTANT
311 8. DK 91 9. NA
VAR 0033 REP 0033 NAME-STRONG LDR ISU-IRPC ELCN ID=GE 8
DATA SET ID-'7225
LOC 54 UIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 55
Q. 7-8. DID TRE ISSUE OF STRONG LEADERSHIP IN OTTARA STRIK YOU AS BEING VERY IUPORTANT, FAIRLY IHPORTANT OR NOT TOO IMPORTANT <IN.DECIDING HOW TO VOTE>? -........*.....-.............*-....-......*...-...-...-....
5162 1639 1066
1. VERY IHPORTANT
:: PAIRLY IHPORTANT NOT TOO IMPORTANT
282 8. DK 44 9. NA
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 21
VAR 0034 REF 0034 DATA SET ID-172251 NANE-GOVT PORMN-IHPC HJRY PTY ilD=GE 8
LOC 55 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 56
Q- 8. NOW I HAVE A DIFFERENT KIND OP QUESTION. IN RECENT ELECTIONS, THE POLITICAL PARTY WHICH HAS PORHED THE GOVERNNENT IN OTTAWA HAS NOT HAD A NAJORITY OF THE SEATS IN PARLIANENT. DO YOU THINK IT BAKES A GREAT DEAL OF DIFFERENCE, SOHE DIPFERENCE, OR NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE RHETHER THE PARTY FORMING THE GOVERNBENT HAS A MAJORITY OF SEATS OR NOT? . . . . ..*............-...-.--......-..--.--...-..-.-..........
4976 1. GREAT DEAL OF DIFFERENCE 1771
f : SOME DIFFERENCE
1206 NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE
233 8. DK 7 9. NA
VAR 0035 REF 0035 NAME-VT OTR PTY IF BJRY GOVT ID=GE 8
LOC 56 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 57
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q- 9. IF YOU BELIEVED THAT A PARTY COULD FORH A HAJORITY GOVERNNENT, BUT YOU DID NOT ORDINARILY VOTE FOR THAT PARTY, HOW LIKELY WOULD YOU BE TO VOTE FOR IT IN ORDER TO HAVE A MAJORITY GOVERNMENT? VERY LIKELY, SOBEYEAT LIKELY, OR NOT AT ALL LIKELY? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-................-.---.-.....-..........
1913 1. VERY LIKELY 2010 2. SOMEWHAT LIKELY 3516 3. NOT AT ALL LIKELY
734 8. DK 20 9. NA
VAR 0036 REP 0036 DATA SET ID-'7225' NANE-DEGREE INTST IN POLITICS HD=GE 8
LOC 57 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 58
Q. 10. HOW RUCH INTEREST DO YOU GENERALLY HAVE IN WHAT IS GOING ON IN POLITICS-A GOOD DEAL, SOME, OR NOT NUCH? -.................1......-....-.......--.-................
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 22
(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . I I . .
2145 1. A GOOD DEAL 3550 SOflE 2U69
:: NOT flUCH
23 8. DK 6 9. NA
VAR 0037 REF 0037 NAHE-CROOKED PEOPLE IN GOVT HD=GE 8
LOC 59 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 59
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 11. NOW I'D LIKE TO TALK ABOUT SOHE OF THE DIFFERENT IDEAS PEOPLE HAVE ABOUT THE GOVERNflENT IN OTTAWA AND SEE HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT THEM. THESE OPINIONS DON'T REFER TO ANY POLITICAL-PARTY IN PARTICULAR, BUT JUST TO THE GOVERNHENT IN GENERAL. FOR EXAPIPLE:
A. DO YOU THINK THAT QUITE A FEW OF THE PEOPLE RUNNING THE GOVERNNENT ARE A LITTLE CROOKED, NOT VERY HANY ARE CROOKED, OR DO YOU THINK HARDLY ANY OF THEN ARE CROOKED? . ..I*._.........*............--..... . . . . . ..-.I...-..-.-.-..
1970 1. QUITE A PEW 3160 2. NOT VERY MANY 2263 3. HARDLY ANY
780 8. DK 20 9. NA
VAR 0038 REF 0038 NAME-TAX MONEY UASTED BY GOVT HD=GE 8
LOC 59 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 60
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 11-B. DO YOU THINK THAT PEOPLE IN THE GOVERNflENT WASTE LOT OF THE I'lONEY WE PAY IN TAXES, WASTE SOME OF IT, OR DON' WASTE VERY tiUCH OF IT? ..**_.._...........*......-......-.*............-....-.-...
2921 1. A LOT 3735 2. son8 1062 3. NOT HUCH
465 8. DK
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 23
(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . . . .
10 9. NA
VAR 0039 REP 0039 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-TST GOVT TO DO RGT THING MD=GE 8
LOC 60 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 61
Q. 11-C. HOW NUCH OF THE TIBE DO YOU THINK YOU CAN TRUST THE GOVERNMENT IN OTTAUA TO DO YHAT IS RIGHT-JUST ABOUT ALWAYS, ROST OF THE TIME, OR ONLY SOME OF THE TIflE? . . . . ..*............*................-....-..-............
764 1. ALWAYS 3973 2. flOST OF THE TIflE 2980 3. SOME OF THE TINE
459 8. DK 17 9. NA
VAR 0040 REF 0040 NAME-GOVT TREAT PEOPLE EQUAL BD=GE 8
LOC 61 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 62
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 11-D. DO YOU THINK THAT ALL PEOPLE WHO ARE HIGH IN GOVERNflENT GIVE EVERYONE A FAIR BREAK, YHETHER THEY ARE BIG SHOTS OR JUST ORDINARY PEOPLE, OR DO YOU THINK SOHE OF THEM PAY ROBE ATTENTION TO WHAT THE BIG INTERESTS WANT? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..*..-.-....-....--............-........
1242 1. GIVE EVERYONE A FAIR BREAK 6121 2. PAY ATTENTION TO BIG SHOTS
795 8. DK 35 9. NA
VAR 0041 REP 0041 NAHE-GOVT PPL KNOW WHAT TO DO MD=GE 8
LOC 62 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 63
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 11-E. DO YOU FEEL THAT ALHOST ALL OF THE PEOPLE RUNNING THE GOVERNMENT ARE SNART PEOPLE WHO USUALLY KNOW YHAT THEY ARE DOING, OR DO YOU THINK THAT QUITE A FEW OF THEM DON'T
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 24
(CONTINUED) ..-...-....
SEEB TO KNOW YHAT THEY ARE DOING? _........._..._....*............-
3221 1. ALL KNOW YHAT THEY ARE DOING 4287 2. QUITE A PEW DON'T KNOW YHAT THEY ARE DOING
653 8. DK 32 9. NA
VAR 0042 REF 0042 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAME-VOTING EPCV POLTL WEAPON ND=GE 0
LOC 63 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 64
Q. 12. HERE ARE SOKE OTBER KINDS OF OPINIONS THAT YOU HEAR DIFFERENT PEOPLE GIVING. FOR THESE I'D JUST LIKE YOU TO TELL ME OFFHAND WHETBER YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE.
A. VOTING IS THE ONLY WAY THAT PEOPLE LIKE BE CAN HAVE ANY SAY ABOUT HOU THE GOVEENNENT RUNS TBINGS. DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE? .._...-.._....*......-..-.......-..-*..*.-..*....*..-...--.
6188 1. AGREE 1800 2. DISAGREE
193 8- DK 12 9. NA
VAR 0043 REP 0043 DATA SET ID-'7225 NANE-PUB OFFICIALS DON'T CARE HD=GE a
LOC 64 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 65
3732 4009
439 13
Q- 12-a. I DON'T THINK THAT TRE GOVERNRENT CARES NUCH UHA' PEOPLE LIKE BE THINK. . . . . . ..s......... -I....--........_...-..........-.-*..-...
1. AGREE 2. DISAGREE
8. DK 9. NA
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 25
VAR 0044 REF 0044 DATA SET ID-17225 NAHE-POLT COMPLCD FOR PEOPLE HD=GE 8
LOC 65 WIDTH 1 DK 1 CDL 66
Q. 12-C. SOlETIMES POLITICS AND GOVERNHENT SEEH SO COMPLICATED THAT A PERSON LIKE fiE CAN'T REALLY UNDERSTAND YHAT'S GOING ON.
5631 1. AGREE 2293 2. DISAGEEE
223 8. DK 46 9. NA
VAR 0045 REP 0045 NAME-PPL LK RE NO POLTL PWR flD=GE 8
LOC 66 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 67
DATA SET I~-'72251
Q. 12-D. PEOPLE LIKE HE DON'T HAVE ANY SAY ABOUT UHAT THE GOVERNMENT DOES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-.....-.-..
Q. 12-E. GENERALLY THOSE ELECTED TO PARLIASENT SOON LOSE TOUCH UITH THE PEOPLE. . . . . . . . . ..-._............................................
4546 1. AGREE 3034 2. DISAGREE
583 8. DK 30 9. NA
_’ . .
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 26
BAR 0047 REP 0047 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-INTLCLS TOO STNG IN GOVT .RD=GE 8
LOC 68 WIDTH 1 DK 1 cOL 69
Q. 12-F. INTELLECTUALS TAKE UP TOO LARGE A POSITION IN OUR GOVERNHENTS. . . .."'~..~~..""'~""""""""""........... ..Iee..m
2924 1. AGREE -_ ' 4164 2. DISAGREE
1105 8. DK 9. NA
VAR 0048 REP 0048 NANE-PSNT FINANCL SATISFACTN MD=GE 8
LOC 69 NIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 70
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 13, WE ARE ALSO INTERESTED IN HOW PEOPLE ARE GETTING ALONG FINANCIALLY THESE DAYS. AS FAR AS YOU AND YOUR PAUILY ARE CONCERNED, WOULD YOU SAY TBAT YOU ARE PRETTY YELL SATISFIED, .BO,RE OR LESS SATISFIED, OR ,NOT AT ALL SATISFIED ABOUT THE YAPhYOU ARE GETTING ALONG? ..,..........-..........-.......-.-.............-........-..
3342 * 1. PRETTY WELL SATISFIED 3362 2. MORE'OR LESS SATISFIED 1389 3. NOT AT ALL SATISFIED
58 8. DK 42 9. NA
VAR 0049 REF 0049 NAME-CHANGE IN FINANCIAL SIT HD=GE 8
LOC 70 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 71
DATA SET ID-'72251
Q. 10. DURING THE LAST PEW PEARS, HAS YOUR FINANCIAL SITUATION BEEN GETTING BETTER, BEEN GETTKNG YORSE. ON HAS IT STAYED THE SAME? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...*- -..-...-.......1_._......-.........
3301 1. GETTING BETTER . 1143 t’ 2. GETTING NORSE
3663 3. STAYED THE SALOE
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 27
42 44
(CONTINUED) . . . ..I.....
8. DK 9. NA
VAR 0050 REP 0050 NABE-PSNT ENPLT SITUATION BTR ID=GE 7
LOC 71 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 72
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q* 15. IN GENERAL, WOULD YOU SAY THAT THE EBPLOYEENT SITUATION OF YOU AND YOUR PAHILY NOY LOOKS HUCA BETTER, SOHEWBAT BETTER, SOREYHAT HORSE OR flUCH UORSE THAN IT DID TUO OR TXREE YEARS AGO? . . . . . . . ..-.........-........-...........-......*-...----.
1534 1. HUCH BETTER 2081 2, SOBEUHAT BETTER 3005 3. ABOUT THE SABE
U81 SOBEYHAT WORSE 251 2: MUCH UORSE
750 7. NOT APPLICABLE 59 8. DK 32 9, NA
VAR 0051 REF 0051 NABE-FUTURE FINANCL SIT BTR? ID=GE B
LOC 72 YIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 73
DATA SET ID-'7225'
3200 3325
872
1. STAY ABOUT TAE SANE
:: GET BETTER GET WORSE
753 8. DK 43 9. NA
Q. 16. NOU LOOKING AHEAD, AND THINKING ABOUT THE NEXT PEU YEARS, DO YOU EXPECT YOUR FINANCIAL SITUATION UILL STAY ABOUT TRE UAY IT IS NOW, GET BETTER, OR GET WORSE? .--..--....-...-...1.-.----....---.--.-...-.........---..-
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
VAR 0052 REP 0052 NAME-ELCTN RSLT AFCT PIN SIT MD=GE B
LOC 73 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 74
PAGE 28
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 17-A. DO YOU THINK THAT THE NAY THE ELECTION TURNED OUT WILL HAKE ANY DIFFERENCE IN HOY UELL OFF YOU ARE? _...................-.-.--.....*.....-....-................
1497 1. YES 5877 2. NO
799 t: DK 20 NA
VAR 0053 REP 0053 NAME-XELCTN HK FIN SIT BTR/US MD=0 OR GE 8
LOC 74 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 75
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 17-B. (IF "YES") : NILL IT <THE WAY THE ELECTION TURNED OUT> MAKE THINGS BETTER OR YORSE? .._--.............._-.-.-.-....-.--..........-.-.---.-.....
825 1. BETTER 431 2. HORSE
233 8. DK 8 9. NA
6696 0. INAP.: CODED 2, 8 OR 9 IN REF. NO. 52.
VAR 0054 REF 0054 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAUE-R UNEHPLOYED IN LAST YR? UD=GE 8
LOC 75 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 76
Q. 18. HAVE YOU BEEN PERSONALLY UNERPLOPED AND LOOKING FOR WORK DURING THE PAST YEAR?
645 1. YES 7491 2. NO
18 8. DK 39 9. NA
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 29
VAR 0055 REP 0055 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAUE-PAHILY tf0R UEKPLD LST YR l'ID=GE 8
LOC 76 YIDTB 1 DK 1 COL 77
Q. 19. HAS ANYONE IN YOUR FAMILY BEEN UNEBPLOYED AND LOOKING FOR UORK DURING THE PAST YEAR? . . . . . . . . . . . . ..__.-._..-....-...........---...........
1058 1. YES 7080 2. NO
47 8. DK 8 9. NA
VAR 0056 REP 0056 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-PA!! BBR UERPLD LST 3 YR HD=GE 8
LOC 77 WIDTH 1 DK 1 CDL 78
1708 6406
Q. 20. WHAT ABOUT THE LAST THREE YEARS? DURING THAT TIME HAVE YOU OR ANY HEHBER OF YOUR PABILY BEEN UNEBPLOYED AND LOOKING FOR WORK? -.._..._......-.......-......-.................--. - I . I . . . .
1. YES 2. NO
58 8. DK 21 9. NA
VAR 0001 REP 0001 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-ICPR STUDY NURBER-7225 NO MISSING DATA CODES
LOC 1 YIDTH 4 DK 2COL 1-4
STUDY NUMBER (7225) .-mm . . . . . . ..I......
VAR 0002 REP 0002 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-INTERVIEY NUiiBER NO BISSING DATA CODES
LOC 5 WIDTH 5 DK 2 COL 5- 9
RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUHBER
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDX PAGE 30
(CONTINUED) . ..-.-em...
THE FIRST DIGIT IDENTIFIES THE PROVINCE AS CODED IN VARIABLE FIVE; THE NEXT FOUR DIGITS ARE THE RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUNBER WITHIN THE PROVINCE. ALL FIVE DIGITS ARE NEEDED TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY A RESPONDENT. _._......-..-...--........................--....-........-..
VAR 0003 REF 0003 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-INTEGER WEIGHT VARIABLE NO HISSING DATA CODES
LOC 10 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 10
INTEGER WEIGHT VALUES
RESPONDENTS WERE WEIGHTED ACCORDING TO THEIR CONSTITUENCY OP'RESIDENCE. ALL SUBJECTS LIVING IN CONSTITUENCY X049 (ALGOKA WEST, ONTARIO) THROUGH 8080 (YENTUORTH, ONTARIO) WERE WEIGHTED BY A FACTOR OF ONE AND ONE-THIRD. RESIDENTS OF X040 (CARTIER, QUEBEC) THRU 1048 (SAINT-JACQUES, QUEBEC) (INCLUSIVE), #081 (YORK CENTRE, ONTARIO) THRU to88 (ROSEDALE, ONTARIO), AND ALL RESPONDENTS FROR BRITISH COLUKBIA WERE DOUBLE REIGHTED. THE REST OF TAE CONSTITUENCIES ARE UNWEIGHTED. SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 4 AND 6.
THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT UNWEIGHTED [RAU) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NOfiBER OF DATA CASES. . . . . ..*........~...............-.-............--............
1113 3. UNUEIGHTED CASES 588 4. WEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES #049-tO80) 417 6. DOUBLE WEIGHTED (CONSTITUENCIES 1040-1048, #081-
YO88, AND #ill-#118)
VAR 0004 REF 0004 DATA SET ID-'7225' NANE-DECIMAL WEIGHT VARIABLE NO RISSING DATA CODES
LOC 11 WIDTH 3 DK 2 COL 11-13 2 DEC PLACE(S)
DECIMAL YEIGHT VALUES PLEASE SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 3 AND 6.
THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT UNWEIGHTED (RAY) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF DATA CASES.
<TUO DECIHAL PLACES ARE IHPLIED> .*.........-.._.......-..--........-...-..--...........-.-
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 31
(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . . . .
1113 588
417
'2' *..
100. UNPEIGHTED CASES 133. WEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES
VAR 0057 REP 0057 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-ANY PRVC/RGN BETTER OFF HD=GE 8
LOC 78 WIDTH 1 DK 2~0~15
Q. 21-A. DO YOU THINK THERE ARE ANY PROVINCES OR REGIONS OF CANADA WHICH ARE BETTER OFF THAN THE OTHERS? . . . . .._...............-.-............-...........-....--....
6123 1. YES
VAR 0058 NAHE
732 2. NO
338 8. DR. IF ANY ARE BETTER OFF 9. NA
EEF 0058 DATA SET It+'7225 XNEYFOUNDLAND BETTER OFF BD=O OR GE 8
LOC 79 YIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 16
Q- 21-B. (IF "YES") : YHICH ONES <PROVINCES OR REGIORS BETTER OFF>? <THE NABES VOLUNTEERED BY THE RESPONDENT (IF ANY) HAVE BEER CODED IN REF. NOS. 58-70 YHERE A VARIABLE REPRESENTS A SINGLE PROVINCE OR REGION.>
Q. 21-B. NEWFOUNDLAND BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REP. NO. 57) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..1...-...........--.---..-...............
33 5978
112
2070
1. YES, NEWFOUNDLAND BETTER OFF 5. NO, R DOES NOT HENTION NEWFOUNDLAND
8. YES, SONE PEOVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK YHICH ONES
0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 57.
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 32
VAR 0059 REP 0059 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XPRNC ED ILND BETTER OFF UD=O OR GE 8
LOC 80 YIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 17
19 5992
112
2070
:: YES, PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND BETTER OFF NO, R DOES NOT UENTION PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND
0. YES, SOHE PROVINCES OR EEGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES
0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 0 IN REF. NO. 57.
VAR 0060 REP 0060 DATA SET ID-*7225' NAME-XNOVA SCOTIA BETTER OFF MD=0 OR r.F R
81 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL-'is-
Q. 21-B. PRINCE EDUARD ISLAND BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 57> .._..................-.-....-......-....-.-.........
LOC
30 5981
112
2070
:: YES, NOVA SCOTIA BETTER OFF NO, R DOES NOT BENTION NOVA SCOTIA
8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK UHICH ONES
0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 57,
VAR 0061 REP 0061 DATA SET ID-'722: NAME-XNEWBRUNSRICK BETTER OFF MD=0 OR GE 8
LOC 82 UIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 19
Q. 21-R. NOVA SCOTIA BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 57) . . . . . . . . . . . ..I....-..**...*..-...-..-.-..-.
Q. 21-B. NEW BRUNSUTCK BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 57> . ..~.~.......I.......~....~...~.......~....~.
05 YES, NEW BRDNSHICK BETTER OFF 5966 :: NO, B DOES NOT MENTION NEY BRUNSWICK
112 8. YES, SOUE PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES
2070 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 57.
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STDDY PAGE 33
VAR 0062 REF 0062 NAME-XQUEBEC BETTER OFF LID=0 OR GE 8
LOC 83 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 20
DATA SET ID-l7225
Q. 21-B. QUEBEC BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES QR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 57> .-.--..........-_._..-......-.--........
1473 4538
112
2070
1. YES, QUEBEC BETTER OFF 5. NO, R DOES NOT BENTION QUEBEC
0. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES
0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 57.
VAR 0063 REP 0063 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAME-XONTARIO BETTER OFF HD=O OR GE 8
LOC 84 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 21
Q- 21-B. ONTARIO BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 57) . . . ..*..-...-....*....*..-.--...........
4319 YES, ONTARIO BETTER OFF 1692 :: NO, R DOES NOT NENTION ONTARIO
112 0. YES, SORE PROVINCES OR EEGIOWS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES
2070 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IR REF. NO. 57,
VAR 0064 REF 0064 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAllE-XHAIITOBA BETTER OFF ?lD=O OR GE 8
LOC 85 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 22
Q. 21-B. HANITOBA BETTER OFF TEAN OTRER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 57) . . . . . ..-..._...-..1..*....---..-...-....
154 5857
112
2070
1. YES, NANITOBA BETTER OFF 5. NO, R DOES NOT !!ENTION MANITOBA
8. YES, SOt!E PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WBICH ONES
0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REP. NO. 57.
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 34
VAR 0065 REF 0065 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XSASKATCHEWAN BETTER OFF CID=0 OR GE El
LOC 86 WIDTH 1 DK 2 cOL 23
380 5631
112
2070
1. YES, SASKATCHEWAN BETTER OFF 5- NO, R DOES NOT HENTION SASKATCHEWAN
8. YES, SOHE PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WBICH ONES
0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 57.
VAR 0066 REF 0066 DATA SET ID-'72251
Q. 21-B. SASKATCAEWAN BETTER OFF THAN OTHEE PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 57) .I-...-.....................................
NAME-XALBERTA BETTER OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 87 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 24
Q. 21-B. ALBERTA BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 57> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-I...*......-.........
1388 1. YES, ALBERTA BETTER OFF 4623 5. NO, R DOES NOT HENTION ALBERTA
112 8. YES, SOBE PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES
2070 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 57.
VAR 0067 REP 0067 DATA SET ID-'72251 NABE-XBRIT COLBBIA BETTER OFF ilD=O OR GE 8
LOC 63 WIDTH 7 DK 2 COL 25
Q. 21-B. BRITISH COLUBBIA BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGXONS, <SEE REF. NO. 57) . ..-.......-.....I....-......--..........-......
2317 1. YES, BRITISH COLUIIBIA BETTER OFF 3694 5. NO, R DOES NOT AENTION BRITISH COLUMBIA
112 8. YES, SOBE PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES
2070 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 57.
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 35
VAR 0068 REP 0068 NAHE-XHARITINES BETTER OFF HD=O OR GE 8
LOC 89 UIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 26
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 21-B- HABITIi4ES BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 57) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-.........--....-.
59::
112
2070
1. YES, RARITIBES BETTER OFF 5. NO, R DOES NOT HENTION HARITInES
8. YES, SONE PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES
0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 57.
VAR 0069 REP 0069 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-XPRAIRIES BETTER OFF i¶D=O OR GE 8
LOC 90 WIDTH 1 DK 2 CoL 27
Q. 21-B. PRAIRIES BETTEE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 57> . ..__*.....*.**..................-.-....
323 5688
112
2070
YES, PRAIRIES BETTER OFF :: NO , R DOES NOT HENTION PRAIRIES
a. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ORES
0, INAP. CODED 2 OR a IN REP. NO. 57.
OAR 0070 REP 0070 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAnE-XSPECIPC AREA BETTER OFF ID=0 OR GE 8
LOC 91 UIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 28
Q. 21-B. SPECIFIC REGIONS OR AREAS BETTER OFF THAN OTAER PROVINCES OR REGIORS. <SEE REF. UO. 57> . . . . . . . . . ..-......-....*.....-...--.---...............--.
732 5279 ::
YES, SPECIFIC REGIONS OR AREAS BETTER OFF NO, R DOES NOT HElsTION SPECIFIC REGIONS OR AREAS
112
2070
a. YES, SOHE PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES
0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REP. NO. 57.
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 36
VAR 0071 REF 0071 NANE-ANY PRVC/RGN UORSE OFF tlD=GE 8
LOC 92 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 29
DATA SET ID-172251
Q. 22-A. DO YOU THINK THERE ARE ANY PROVINCES OR REGIONS OF CANADA WHICH ARE WORSE OFF THAN THE OTHERS? . . ..-.....1.__.....-..--........-..----.............--....-.
5925 553
1715
1. YES 2. NO
8. DK, IF ANY ARE WORSE OFF 9. NA
VAR 0072 REP 0072 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAKE-XNEWFOUNDLAND UORSE OFF HD=O OR GE 8
LOC 93 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 30.
Q. 22-B. (IF "YES") : WHICH ONES <PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF>? <THE NAHES VOLUNTEERED BY TAE RESPONDENT (IF ANY) HAVE BEEN CODED IN REF. NOS. 72-84 WHERE A VARIABLE REPRESENTS A SINGLE PROVINCE OR REGION.>
Q. 22-B. NEWFOUNDLAND WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO, 71> . .._...*.__.....-.-....-.........-.-.............--..
1291 4461
173
2268
1. YES, NEWFOUNDLAND WORSE OFF 5. NO, R DOES NOT BENTION NEWFOUNDLAND
8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES
0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 71.
VAR 0073 REP 0073 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-XPRINC ED ILND YORSE OFF BD=O OR GE 8
LOC 94 WIDTR 1 DK 2COL31
Q. 22-B. PRINCE EDPARD ISLAND HORSE OFF TAAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 71> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-..-.-.-.-..-....
602 1. YES. PRINCE EDUARD ISLAND RORSE OFF 5150 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION PRINCE EDWARD ISLAUD
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 37
(CONTINUED) .--.I--....
173 8. YES, SOBE PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK UHICH ONES
2268 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 71.
VAR 0074 REP 0074 DATA SET ID-'72251 NABE-XNOVA SCOTIA WORSE OFF ND=0 OR GE 8
LOC 95 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 32
8. 22-B. NOVA SCOTIA WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 71> . . . . ..--...rrr...........*.......-~-...---
929 4823
173
2268
1. YES, NOVA SCOTIA UORSE OFF 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION NOVA SCOTIA
a. YES, SOBE PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK RHICB ONES
0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REP. NO, 71.
VAR 0075 REF 0075 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-XNEW BRUNSWICK WORSE OFF BD=O OR GE 8
LOC 96 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 33
Q. 22-B. NEW BRUNSWICK UORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 71> __.-........*......-...-......-..........--.
886 4866
173
2268
1. YES, NEY BRUNSWICK UORSE OFF 5. NO, R DOES NOT HENTION NEW BRUNSWICK
a. YES, sonE PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK UHICH ONES
0. INAP, CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 71.
VAR 0076 REP 0076 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-XQUEBEC WORSE OFF ID=0 OR GE 8
LOC 97 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 34
Q. 22-B. QUEBEC RORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 71) .--..--..-.......-..........-........-..
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 38
(CONTINUED) . . . . . . - . . . .
802 4950
173
2268
1. YES, QUEBEC PORSE OFF 5. NO, R DOES NOT BENTION QUEBEC
a. YES, SO8E PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK RHICH ONES
0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 71.
VAR 0077 REP 0077 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAHE-XONTARIO WORSE OFF ID=0 OR GE 8
LOC 98 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 35
65 5687
173
2268
1. YES, ONTARIO UORSE OFF 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION ONTARIO
a. YES, sow PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES
0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 71.
VAR 0078 REP 0078 DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 22-B. ONTARIO WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 71) . . ..-....-...-.................-..--....
NAHE-X8ANITOBA UORSE OFF MD=0 OR GE U LOC 99 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 36
Q. 22-B. MANITOBA WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 71> . . . . . ..-.............---.-..............
245 5507
173
2268
YES, :: NO
8ANITOBA WORSE OFF , R DOES NOT MENTION HANITOBA
8. YES, SONE PROVINCES OR REGIOWS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES
0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. PO, 71.
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 39
VAR 0079 REP 0079 NANE-XSASKATCHEWAN WORSE OFF ID=0 OR GE 0
LOC 100 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 37
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 22-B. SASKATCHEUAN WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 71) . . ..-------.....*....----.....-........-...
335 5417
173
2268
YES, SASRATCHEUAN WORSE OFF :: NO , R DOES NOT RENTION SASKATCHEWAN
8. YES, SORE PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK UHICH ONES
0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REP, NO. 71.
VAR 0080 REP 0080 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XALBERTA YORSE OFF MD=0 OR GE 8
LOC 101 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 38
Q. 22-B. ALBERTA WORSE OFF TBAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 71> ..-I.-..............--...........-..*--.
82 1. YES, ALBERTA WORSE OFF 5670 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION ALBERTA
173 8. YES, SOLIE PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE fORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES
2268 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 71.
VAR 0081 REP 0081 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-XBRIT COLflBIA YORSE OFF HD=O OR GE 8
LOC 102 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 39
56 5696
173
2268
Q. 22-B. BRITISH COLUHBIA WORSE OFF THAN OTRER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 71> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-...........-.---....--.
1. YES, BRITISH COLUHBIA YORSE OFF 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION BRITISH COLIJBBIA
8. YES, SOBE PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES
0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO, 71,
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE UO
9AR 0082 REP 0082 NAME-XWARITICIES YORSE OFF !lD=O OR GE 8
LOC 103 YIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 40
DATA SET ID-'72251
Q- 22-B. PIARITIRES WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO, 71) . . ..I.............-..---..-.*...........
2892 2860
173
2268
:: YES, HARITIHES HORSE OFF NO, R DOES NOT BERTION IARITIIES
8. YES, SOlE PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES
0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REP. NO. 71.
VAR 0083 REF 0083 DATA SET ID-'7225' NANE-XPRAIRIES WORSE OFF LID=0 OR GE 8
LOC 104 WIDTH 1 DK 2COLUl
Q. 22-B. PRAIRIES WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. NO. 71) . . . . . . ..-....---.-................-.----
138 5614
173
2268
1. YES, PRAIRIES WORSE OFF 5. NO, R DOES NOT HENTION PRAIRIES
8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE YORSE OPP, BUT DK YHICH ONES
0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 71.
VAR 0084 REP 0084 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XSPECIPIC AREA WORSE OFF lDf0 OR GE 8
LOC 105 YIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 42
1OlU 4738
173
2268
Q. 22-B. SPECIFIC REGIONS OR AREAS YORSE OFF THAN OTEER PROVIYCBS OR REGIONS. <SEE REF. UO. 71> . . . . .._*II_.............*---*-................-.--.-....
2: YES, SPECIFIC REGIONS OR AREAS WORSE OPP 10, R DOES NOT RENTION SPECIFIC REGIOUS OR AREAS
a. YES, SOME PBOlINCES OR PBGIORS ARE WORSE O?F, BUT DK HHXCI OUES
0. IIIAP. CODED 2 OR 8 Ill REF. NO- 71-
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE Ul
9AR 0085 REP 0085 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-R'S OWN PVNC BTR/YRS OFF HD=O OR GE 8
LOC 106 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 43
Q. 23. HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT THIS PROVINCE? DO YOU THINK IT IS BETTER OPF THAN HOST, WORSE OPF, OR ABOUT AVERAGE? <IF RESPONDENT'S PROYINCE YAS ROT NENTIONED IN Q. 21-B OR Q. 22-B, THEN Q. 23 HAS ASKED; OTHERWISE INTERVIEWER SKIPPED TO Q. 24> . . . . . . -..- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . m.* . . . . ..I .-....-......-I..
974 1. BETTER OFF 148 2. YORSE OFP
2456 3. ABOUT AVERAGE
169 8. DK 403 NA
4048 INAP, R's PROVINCE YAS UENTIONED IN REF. Nos. 58-70 OR REF. NOS. 72-84.
VAR 0086 REP 0086 NABE-UOULD LIKE LIVE-NUFNDLD )ID=CE 8
LOC 107 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 44
DATA SET I&*7225’
Q. ZC-AL. IN UEICH CANADIAN PROVINCES DO PDU THINK YOU NIGHT LIKE TO LIVE? <THE NACIES VOLUNTEERED BY THE RESPONDENT (IF ANY) HAVE BEEX CODED IN REP, NOS. 86-95 #HERE A VARIABLE REPRESENTS A SINGLE PROVINCE OR REGION.>
Q- 24-A. <YOULD II LIKE TO LIVE IN NENFOUNDLAND> . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. -.1...-...................-.-......-.-.
124 YfS, R RENTIONED NEWFOUNDLAND 7657 2: NO, R DID MOT lENTION NEWFOUNDLAND
412 8. DK YBICK PROVINCE l? YOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN
VAR 0087 RCF 0087 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-YOULD LIKE LIVE-P.E ILRD RD-GE 8
LOC 108 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL $5
<UOULD R LIKE TO LIVE IN RRIRCE EDWARD ISLAND> <SEE REF. NO. 86)
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 42
(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . . . .
207 YES, 7570 :: NO
R !!ENTIONED PRINCE EDlARD ISLAND , R DID NOT MENTION PRINCE EDRARD ISLAND
u12 8. DK NHICH PROVINCE R YOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN
VAR 0088 REP 0088 NAME-YOULD LIKE LIVE-NOVASCOT BD=CE 8
LOC 103 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 46
DATA SET ID-'7225'
284 7497 ::
YES, R HENTIONED NOVA SCOTIA NO, R DID NOT MENTION NOVA SCOTIA
412 8. DK YHICH PROVINCE R YOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN
<WOULD R LIKE TO LIVE IN NOVA SCOTIA> <S.EE REP. NO. 86> . . . . . . . ..*...-.......--.-...~........
VAR 0089 REP 0089 DATA SET ID-'7225' NARE-ROULD LIKE LIVE-NENBNSYK MD=GE B
LOC 110 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 47
<NOULD R LIKE TO LIVE IN NEW BRONSYICK> <SEE REF. NO. 86> . . . . ..l............l.*...........-.....
319 1. YES, R MENTIONED NEA BRUNSWICK 7462 5. NO, R DID NOT MENTION NEU BRUNSUICK
412 8. DK WHICH PROVINCE R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN
VAR 0090 REP 0090 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-YOULD LIKE LIVE-QUEBEC tlD=GE 8
LOC 111 WIDTH 7 DK 2 COL 4s I
<UOULD R LIKE TO LIVE IN QUEBEC> <SEE REF. NO- B6> .? . . ..---... I . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . -
2074 1. YES, R MENTIONED QUEBEC
*
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 43
(CONTINUED) ..-.... . . . .
5707 5. NO, R DID NOT MENTION QURBEC
412 8. DK WHICH PROVINCE R UOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN
VAR 0091 REP 0091 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-WOULD LIKE LIVE-ONTARIO MD=GE 8
LOC 112 UIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 49
<UOULD R LIKE TO LIVE IN ONTARIO> <SEE REP. NO. 86> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..~.......~...-...
3234 4547 ::
YES, R MENTIONED ONTARIO NO, R DID NOT HENTION ONTARIO
412 8. DK WHICH PROVINCE R YOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN
VAR 0092 REP 0092 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-UOULD LIKE LIVE-IANITOBA MD-GE 8
LOC 113 UIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 50
<WOULD R LIKE TO LIVE XN HANITOBA> <SEE REF. NO. 86) . ..l.....s.......s.*..s.m.........
383 YES, 7398 :: NO
R CIENTIONED MANITOBA , H DID NOT MENTION MANITOBA
412 8. DK WHICH PROVINCE R UOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN
VAR 0093 BEP 0093 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-WOULD LIKE LIVE-SASKTUN MD=GE 8
LOC 114 UIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 51
<WOULD R LIKE TO LIVE IN SASKATCHEYAU> <SEE REF. NO. 86) . . . . . . . ..I... * . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . ..r..
380 1. YES, R MENTIONED SASKATCEIEYAN 7401 5. NO, R DID NOT MENTION SASKATCBEYAN
1965 CANADYAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 4U
(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . . . .
412 8. DK YHICH PROVINCE R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN
VAR 0094 REP 0094 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-WOULD LIKE LfVE-ALBERTA lD=GE 8
LOC 115 YIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 52
<WOULD R LIKE TO LIVE IN ALBERTA> <SEE REF. NO. 86> ..I..............................
1032 1. YES, R MENTIONED ALBERTA 6749 5. NO, R DID NOT MENTION ALBERTA
412 8. DK WHICR PROVINCE R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN
VAR 0095 REP 0095 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-YOULD LIKE LIVE-BRTCOLBB BD=GE 8
LOC 116 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 53
<UOULD R LIKE TO LIVE IN BRITISH COLUHBIA> <SEE REP. NO. 86> . . ..*.....................................
3056 1. YES, R MENTIONED BRITISH COLDBBIA 4725 5. NO, R DID NOT KENTION BRITISH COLURBIA
412 8. DK AHICH PROVINCE R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN
VAR 0096 REP 0096 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-WOULD NOT LIVE-NUPNDLD ND=0 08 GE B
LOC 117 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 54
Q. 24-B. IN YHICH CANADIAN PROVINCES WOULD YOU DEFINITELY NEVER PANT TO LIVE? <TEE NAMES VOLUNTEERED BY THE RESPOKDENT (IF ANY) HAVE BEEN CODED IN BEP. NOS. 96-105 WHERE A VARIABLE REPRESENTS A SINGLE PROVINCE OR REGION.>
1613 1. YES, A DOES NOT WANT TO LIVE IN SASKATCHEWAN 4058 5. NO KENTION OF SASKATCHEWAN TO Q. 24-B
1249 8. DK WHICH PROVINCES R WOULD NOT YANT TO LIVE IN 1273 0. R WOULD LIVE IN ALL THE PROVINCES
VAR 0104 REP 0104 DATA SET ID-'7225' NARE-WOULD NOT LIVE-ALBERTA ID=0 OR GE 8
LOC 125 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 62
1030 4641 2:
YES, R DOES NOT WANT TO LIVE IN ALBERTA NO HENTION OF ALBERTA TO Q. 24-B
1249 8. DK WHICH PROVINCES E WOULD NOT PANT TO LIVE IN 1273 0. R WOULD LIVE IN ALL THE PROVINCES
<R WOULD NOT WANT TO LIVE IN ALBERTA> <SEE REF. NO. 96> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
VAR 0105 REP 0105 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WOULD NOT LIVE-BRT COLHB HD=O 08 GE 8
LOC 126 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 63
<R WOULD NOT YANT TO LIVE IN BRITISH COLffIBIA> <SEE REP. NO. 96) . . . . ..I.......................................
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTXON STUDY PAGE U8
(CONTINUED) .,........-
555 1. YES, R DOES NOT UANT TO LIVE IN BRITISH COLUNBIA 5116 5. NO RENTION OF BRITISH COLUMBIA TO Q. 24-B
1249 8. DK WHICH PROVINCES R WOULD NOT WANT TO LIVE IN 1273 0. R YOULD LIVE IN ALL THE PROVINCES
VAR 0106 REP 0106 DATA SET ID-‘7225 NAME-DIEFENBAKR-BARTIRE CNCTN ID=0 OR GE 8
LOC 127 YIDTH 1 DK 2 CDL 64
639 1. YES 5821 5. NO
1243 8. DK 4 9. NA
486 0. DIEPENBAKER HAS TEE SAEE COUNECTIONS TO ALL REGIOYS
VAR 0107
Q- 25. THINKING NOW OF TPE NATXONAL LEADERS OF THE FOUR HAIN POLITICAL PARTIES, UHICH PART OF THE COUNTRY DO YOU THINK TfiESE MEN ARE CLOSEST TO: THE RARITIBES, QUEBEC, ONTARIO, TRE PRAIRIES OR BRITISB COLURBIA? TAKE HR. DIEFENBAKER. DOES HE NAVE RORE CONNECTION WITH THE HARITIIIES, QUEBEC, ONTARIO, THE PRAIRIES, OR BRITISH COLUfEIA?
<IS DIEFENBAKER CONRECTED PITR TRE IARITI%ES?> .,,,,.,,,.,,,,,,,..,.,.......,..........................
REP 0107 DATA SET ID-'7225 NAflE-DIEFENBAKER-QUEBEC CNCTU MD=0 OR GE B
766 DOUGLAS HAS THE SAHE CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS
VAR 0118 REF 0118 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-DOUGLAS-ONTARIO CONNECTN ID=0 OR GE 8
LOC 139 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 76
VAR 0119 REP 0119 DATA SET ID-'7225'
597 4084
2739 7
766
YHAT ABOUT BR. DOUGLAS? <IS HE CONNECTED UITH ONTARIO?> ,,,,..,.,,,,,.,,,..,,....,,......,.............,........
1. YES 5. NO
8. DK 9. NA 0. DOUGLAS HAS THE SAEE CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS
NABE-DOUGLAS-PRAIRIE CONNECTN ID=0 OR GE 8 LOC 140 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 77
UHAT ABOUT RR. DOUGLAS? <IS HE CONNECTED UITR THE PRAIRIES> ,,,.,,.,,,..,,.....,.....,................-.................
2778 1. YES 1903 5. no
2739 8. DK 7 9. IA
766 0. DOUGLAS HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 53
VAR 0120 REP 0120 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-DOUGLAS-BRTCOLUBB CNCTN ID=0 OR GE 8
LOC 141 UIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 78
WHAT ABOUT HR. DOUGLAS? <IS RE COUNECTED UITH BRITISH COLUBBIA?> . ..I..................................................
1618 1. YES 3063 5. NO
2739 8. DK -I 9. NA
766 0. DOUGLAS HAS THE SARE CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS
VAR 0001 REP 0001 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-ICPR STUDY NUHBER-7225 NO MISSING DATA CODES
LOC 1 YIDTH 4 DK 3 COL l- 4
STUDY NUMBER (7225) . , I , , . . I . . . . . . . . . . .
VAR 0002 REP 0002 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAHE-INTERVIER NUBBEE NO MISSING DATA CODES
LOC 5 UIDTH 5 DK 3 COL 5- 9
RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUBBEE
THE FIRST DIGIT IDENTIFIES THE PROVINCE AS CODED IN VARIABLE FIVE; THE NEXT FOUR DIGITS ARE THE RESPOBDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUBBER UITRIN THE PROVINCE. ALL FIVE DIGITS ARE NEEDED TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY a RESPONDENT. . . . . . . . . . . ..I...............................................
VAR 0003 REP 0003 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-INTEGER UEIGHT VARIABLE NO MISSING DATA CODES
LOC 10 WIDTH 1 DK 3COLlO
INTEGER UEIGHT VALUES
RESPONDENTS UERE WEIGHTED ACCORDING TO TEEIR CONSTITUENCY OP RESIDENCE. ALL SUBJECTS LIVING IN CONSTITUEUCY *049 (ALGORA WEST, ONTARIO) THROUGH lo80 (YENTYOETH, ONTARIO) AERE
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 54
(CONTINUED) . . . . ..I....
WEIGHTED BY A FACTOR OP ONE AND ONE-THIRD. RESIDENTS OP X040 (CARTIER, QUEBEC) THRU 1048 (SAINT-JACQUES, QUEBEC) (INCLUSIVE), to81 (YORK CENTRE, ONTARIO) THRU to88 (ROSEDALE, ONTARIO), AND ALL RESPONDENTS FROB BRITISH COLUMBIA WERE DOUBLE WEIGHTED. THE REST OF THE CONSTITUENCIES ARE UNYEIGHTED. SEE ALSO REP, NOS. 4 AND 6.
THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESRNT UNWEIGHTED (RAW) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUNBER OF DATA CASES. ,,,,.,.,,.,,,,,,,.,.,...,...,......,,...,..,.,..,,,.,.,,,.,,
1113 3. UNWEIGHTED CASES 588 4. WEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CORSTITUENCIES 1049-1080) 417 6. DOUBLE WEIGHTED (CONSTITUENCIES #040-t048, #081-
CO88, AND till-1118)
VAR 0004 REP 0004 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAflE-DECIKAL WEIGHT VARIABLE NO KISSING DATA CODES
LOC 11 UIDTH 3 DK 3 COL 11-13 2 DEC PLACE(S)
DECIBAL UEIGHT VALUES PLEASE SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 3 AND 6.
THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT UNUEIGHTED (RAU) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUEBER OF DATA CASES.
<TWO DECIRAL PLACES ARE IBPLIED> ..r..,,,..,.,.,.,..,.,,,.....,,,.,,.,,,.....,......,*.....
1113 100. UNWEIGHTED CASES 588 133. WEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES
VAR 0121 REF 0121 NARE-THOMPSON-RARITIBES CRCTN MD=0 OR GE B
LOC 142 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 15
PAGE 55
DATA SET ID-'72251
WHAT ABOUT HR. THORPSON? <IS HE CONNECTED WITH TBE ClARITIRES?> -....*.................................-.....-.....
128 1. YES 3910 5. NO
3728 8. DK 7 9. NA
420 0. THOBPSON HAS THE SAHE CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS
VAR 0122 REF 0122 DATA SET ID-172251 NAME-THOBPSON-QUEBEC CONNECTN LID=0 OR GE 8
LOC 143 YIDTH 1 DK 3 cOL 16
PHAT ABOUT RR. TEOMPSON? <IS HE CONNECTED UITH QUEBEC?> . . . . . . . . . ..__...-1._..-...--.-.-...-.--..-....-.........
291 YES 3747 :: NO
3728 8. DK 7 9. NA
420 0. THOMPSON HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS
VAR 0123 REP 0123 DATA SET,ID-'7225' NAME-THOBPSON-ONTARIO CNCTN flD=O OR GE 8
LOC 144 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 17
YAAT ABOUT HR. THOMPSON? <IS HE CONNECTED YITH ONTARIO?> *.-...................-..................................
471 YES 3567 :: NO
3728 8. DK 7 9. WA
420 0. THOMPSON AAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 56
VAR 0124 REP 0124 DATA SET ID-'72251 NARE-THOMPSON-PRAIRIES CNCTN BD=O OR GE 8
LOC 145 UIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 18
UHAT ABOUT RR. THOBPSON? <IS HE CONNECTED WITH THE PRAIRIES?> . . . . . . . . . . . ..-.-_-._...-.--.--................-....
2669 1. YES 1369 5. NO
3720 8. DK 7 9. NA
420 0. THOHPSON HAS THE SABE CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS
VAR 0125 REP 0125 NABE-THOHPSON-BRTCOLNBA CNCTN fiD=O
LOC 146 YIDTH 1 DK 3
WHAT ABOUT HR. THOHPSON? COLUEBIA?>
DATA SET ID-'7225' OR GE 8 COL 19
<IS BE CONNECTED RITH BRITISH
766 YES 3272 :: NO
3720 0. DK 7 9. WA
420 0. THOHPSON HAS THE SAHE CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS
VAR 0126 REP 0126 DATA SET ID-'7225' NARE-CAOUETTE-HARITIBES CNCTN ID=0 OR GE 0
LOC 147 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 20
WHAT ABOUT RR. CAOUETTE? <IS HE CONNECTED HITH THE EARITIHES?> . ..--..-...-.-1---.1..-.-..-.---.....--..--..-.---.
62:: :: NO YES
1744 8. DK 19 9. NA
104 0. CAOUETTE RAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS.
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 57
VAR 0127 REF 0127 DATA SET ID-972251 NANE-CAOUETTE-QUEBEC CONNECTN HD=O OR GE B
LOC 148 YIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 21
UHAT ABOUT RR. CAOUETTE? <IS HE CONNECTED WITH QUEBEC?> .*.........--.-...-.....-....-..-..............-...-....
6190 1. YES 136 5. NO
1744 8, DK 19 9. AA
104 0. CAOUETTE HAS THE SANE CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS.
VAR 0128 REF 0128 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-CAOUETTE-ONTARIO CNCTN ED=0 OR GE 8.
LOC 149 YIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 22
WHAT ABOUT RR. CAOUETTE? <IS HE CONNECTED UITH ONTARIO?> ..~~~..~.........~1~.~~....~....~...~....~..~.........~..
52 1. YES 6274 5. NO
1744 8. DK 19 9. NA
104 0. CAOUETTE HAS THE SAME CONWECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS.
VAR 0129 REP 0129 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CAOUETTE-PRAIRIES CNCTN ID=0 OR GE 8
LOC 150 YIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 23
25 1. YES 6301 5. NO
1744 19
104
DK t: NA 0. CAOUETTE HAS THE SAlE CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS.
UHAT ABOUT RR. CAOUETTE? <IS HE CONNECTED YITR THE PRAIEIES?> . . . ..1---...........--..-.--.--.......-.-.....-....
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 58
BAR 0130 REP 0130 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CAOUETTE-BRTCOLNBA CNCTN ID=0 OR GE B
LOC 151 UIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 24
WHAT ABOUT 8R. CAOUETTE? <IS HE CONNECTED WITH BRITISH COLUNBIA?> . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-._........-..--........-.-.........--..
25 1. YES 6301 5. NO
1744 8. DK 19 9. NA
104 0. CAOUETTE HAS THE SAHE CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS.
VAR 0131 REF 0131 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-BEST PRI@lE HINISTER UD=GE 80 IULT RESPS 2
LOC 152 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 25-28
Q. 26. WHICH POLITICAL FIGURE TODAY DO YOU THINK WOULD HAKX THE BEST PRIflE MINISTER FOR CANADA? . . ..*_...........I....................--..-.......-.--......
675 01, JOHN DIEFENBAKER 1230 02. LESTER PEARSON
888 03. TOlKY DOUGLAS 201 04. TONMY THONPSON 138 05. REAL CAOUETTE 507 06. GEORGE HEES 420 07. PAUL IIARTIN 155 08. ROBERT WINTERS 199 09. JORN ROBART 120 10. DAVID FULTON
964 80. MISCELLANEOUS HENTIONS 4 90. MORE THAN TIO MENTIONS
7904 92. NO SECOND HENTION 417 96. CAN'T ANSWER: NO IDEA
1591 98. DK 197 99. NA
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 59
VAR 0132 REF 0132 DATA SET I~-'72251 NANE-DFRNC BTVN FEDERAL PTYS HD=GE 8
LOC 156 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 29
8. 27. ONE OF THE TAINGS PE ARE INTERESTED IN IS THE DIFFERENCES WHICH EXIST BETVEEN OUR FEDERAL POLITICAL PARTIES. CONSIDERING EVERYTHING THE PARTIES STAND FOR, WOULD YOU SAY THAT THERE IS A GOOD DEAL OF DIFFERENCE BETVEEN THE PARTIES, SONE DIFFERENCE, OR NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE? .--.-...*..*..........-....---..*..-....-..-.........-.
1970 1. GOOD DEAL OF DIFFERENCE 2937 2. SOME DIFFERENCE 2893 3. NOT NUCR DIFFERENCE
385 8. DK 8 9. NA
VAR 0133 REF 0133 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-FEDERAL PTYS HOST ALIKE ID=GE 83
LOC 157 VIDTR 2 DK 3 COL 30-31
Q. 28-A. WHICH OF OUR FEDERAL POLITICAL PARTIES DO YOU FEEL ARE MOST ALIKE? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..**.-.--..*.........-...-......-...*-..-.....
114 45. SOCIAL CBBDIT-CREDITISTE 29 46. SOCIAL CREDIT-CCP 39 48. SOCIAL CBEDIT-OTEER
6 56. CREDITISTE-CC? 29 sa. CREDITISTE-OTBER
f
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 61
(CONTINUED) . . . . ..m..*.
54 56
354 487
2045 a
VAR 0135 NINE-WCH
LOC
3628 2769 1449
276 71
VAR 0136 REP 0136 DATA SET ID-'7225'
68. CCP-OTHER
81. ALL THE SAME 82. ALL DIFFERENT
63. ONLY ONE PARTY KENTIONED 84. HORE THAN TUO PARTIES BEUTIOKED 98. DK 99. %A
REP 0135 DATA SET ID-'7225' PTY GOVERNS HATTERS KD=GE 8 161 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 34
Q. 29. IN YOUR OPINION, DO YOU THINK IT HAKES A GREAT DEAL OF DIFFERENCE, SOBE DIFFERENCE, OR NO DIFFERENCE, YAICH POLITICAL PARTY RUNS THIS COUNTRY? . . . . . . . . . . ..-.....-.....-..--............-..........--.-...
1. GREAT DEAL 2. SOBE DIFFERENCE 3. NO DIFFERENCE
8. DK 9. NA
NAHE-IDEAL PTY-OLD/UODERN BD=GE 8 LOC 162 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 35
Q. 30. (SHOY CARD), NOY I RAVE A DIFFERENT KIND OF QUESTION FOR YOU. I'll GOING TO SHOW YOU SOBE WORD PAIRS. EACA PAIR IS SEPARATED BY SEVEN BOXES LIKE THIS. IF IOU THINK TEAT TEE PARTICULAR POLITICAL PARTY IS VERY WELL KNOUN, YOU WOULD PUT A CBECK flARK IN THE BOX ON THE LEFT END OF THE SCALE. IF YOU PEEL IT IS NOT KNOWN AT ALL, YOO YOULD CHECK THE BOX ON THE RIGHT END OP THE SCALE. OR YOU EIGHT RATE IT SOKEPHERE BETHEEN TRESE TWO EITRBNES.
A. FIRST, WE'LL START UITH AN IHAGLNART POLITICAL PARTY-THE ONE YOU BOULD CONSIDER IDEAL FOR CANADA.
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 62
(CONTINUED)
THE IDEAL PARTY . . . . . ..-..-*I--
109 1. OUT OF DATE 109 2. 122 3. 966 4.
1082 5. 1500 6. 3967 7, MODERN
338 8. DK
VAR 0137 REP 0137 NANE-IDEAL PTY-CMPTNT/INCklPTN ND-GE 8
LOC 163 YIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 36
DATA SET ID-'7225'
(30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REP. NO. 136> . . . . . . . ..--.-.r.......-..--.-..........-.-.---..............
6354 :: CONPETENT 742 207 3. 262 4.
53 5. 61 6. 91 7. INCORPETENT
343 8. DK
VAR 0138 REP 0138 DATA SET ID-'7225' NARE-IDEAL PTP-POIERFUL/YEAK HD=GE 8
LOC 164 YIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 37
.OO. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REP, NO- 136> -* . . . . . . . *.-mm . ..I...... m-1-. -.--.......-....--..........-..
3811 1. POYERFUL 1445 2. 1530 3.
870 4. 97 5.
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 63
(CONTINUED) I..........
38 6. 53 7, WEAK
349 8. DK
VAR 0139 REP 0139 NAIIE-IDEAL PTY-POOLISH/UISE ID=GE 8
LOC 165 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 38
129 1. FOOLISH 58 2. 62 3.
258 4. 369 5. 876 6.
6087 7. WISE
354 8. DK
DATA SET ID-'7225'
(30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REP. NO. 136) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .._.......-...............-.....---...-.-...
VAR 0140 REP 0140 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-IDEAL PTY-HID/HRKG CLS ID=GE 8
LOC 166 YIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 39
(30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REF. NO. 136> --....................................................-.....
509 231 377
3922 505 383
1881
1. FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS 2. 3. 4. 5.
4: FOR THE WORKING CLASS
385 0. DK
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 64
VAR 0141 REP 0141 NAME-IDEAL PTY-UNITED/SPLIT KD=GE 8
LOC 167 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 40
DATA SET ID-'7225'
<30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REF. NO. 136> . . ..-..__................-..................................
5413 1. UNITED 942 2. 590 3. 601 4. 132 5.
62 6. 108 7. SPLIT
345 8. DK
VAR 0142 REF 0142 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-IDEAL PTY-BAD/GOOD IJD=GE 8
LOC 168 WIDTH 1 DK 3COL41
(30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REF. NO. 136) . . . . . . . . . . . ..1..--.-.............--...-..-.-..-..-...*......
103 1, BAD 36 2. 49 3.
252 321 2: 725 6.
6357 7. GOOD
350 8, DK
VAR 0143 REP 0143 NAHE-IDEAL PTY-LEFT/RIGHT KD=GE 8
LOC 169 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 42
DATA SET ID-'7225'
(30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY ?OR CABADA. SEE REF. NO. 136) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-...--..............-....-...-....-..-.....
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 65
321 1. LEFT WING 174 2. 432 3.
3849 4. 675 5. 558 6.
1581 7. RIGHT WING
603 8. DK
(CONTINUED) . . ..w......
VAR 0144 REF 0144 NANE-IDEAL PTY-STG/PEAK NIND llD=GE 8
LOC 170 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 43
DATA SET ID-'7225'
4849 1. STRONG-HIYDED 1531 2.
748 3. 522 4.
69 5. 40 6. 68 7. WEAK-RINDED
358 8. DK
(30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REF. NO. 136) ..-.1.............1._-...--.......-.......----...............
VAR 0145 REr 0145 NARE-IDEAL PTT-iiONEST/DBONEST f!lD=GE 6
LOC 171 YIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 44
DATA SET ID-'7225'
6844 1. HONEST 526 2.
(30. A. R'S RATIBG OF IDZAl. PAITT POR CAliADA, SEE RL?. MO. 136> -................_*................-......*...*..-...-...*..
230 3. 196 4.
18 5. 16 6. 48 7. DISHONEST
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 66
(CONTINUED) . . . . . . .I...
313 8. DK
VAR 0146 REF 0146 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAKE-IDEAL PTY-DULL/EXCITING MD=GE 8
LOC 172 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 45
(30. A. R'S RATIRG OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REF. NO. 136>
VAR 0172 REP 0172 NAME-CNSVTV PTX-DOLL/EXCITING HD=GE 8
LOC 198 WIDTH 1 DK 3COLfl
DATA SET ID-'72251
<B'S RATING OP CONSERVATIVE PARTY. SEE REP. ND. 136) . . . . . . . . . ..-.........-............-.--..........-.--.
906 1. DULL 860
1256 :: 2351 4. 1056 5.
638 550 :: EXCITING
576 6. DK
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 77
VAR 0173 REP 0173 NAUE-CNSVTV PTX-YOUNG/OLD HD=GE 8
LOC 199 YIDTB 1 DK 3 COL 72
DATA SET fD-'7225a
302 1. YOUNG 260 2. 517 3-
2152 4. 1543 5. 1262 6. 1582 7. OLD
575 8. DK
<R'S EATING OF CONSERVATIVE PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136> . . . . . ..*.-*-....*.--.-.-..-...-.....--...-.-.........
VAR 0174 REP 0174 DATA SET ID-'7225' NANE-CNSVTV PTX-SLOW/FAST BD=GE 8
LOC 200 DIDTR 1 DK 3 COL 73
<R'S RATING OF CONSERVATIVE PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136> -._................................-.................
993 1. SLOR 944 2.
1318 3. 2680 4.
940 5. 433 6. 327 7. FAST
558 8. DK
VAR 0001 REF 0001 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAf'IE-ICPR STUDY NUNBEE- NO HISSING DATA CODES
LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DK 4COL l-4
STUDY NUBBEB (7225) . ..-1.1s1w.1.......
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDX PAGE 78
VAR 0002 REP 0002 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-INTERVIEW NUBBER NO EISSING DATA CODES
LOC 5 UIDTA 5 DK 4 COL s- 9
RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
THE FIRST DIGIT IDENTIFIES THE PROVINCE AS CODED IN VARIABLE FIVE; THE NEXT FOUR DIGITS ARE THE RESP~NDENT*S IDENTIFICATION NUMBER WITHIN THE PROVINCE. ALL FIVE DIGITS ARE NEEDED TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY A RESPONDENT.
VAR 0003 REP 0003 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAKE-INTEGER WEIGHT VARIABLE NO KISSING DATA CODES
LOC 10 U.IDTH 1 DK 4COLlO
INTEGER YEIGHT VALUES
RESPONDENTS WERE UEIGHTED ACCORDING TO THEIR CONSTITUENCY OF RESIDENCE. ALL SUBJECTS LIVING IN CONSTITUENCY #049 (ALGOBA WEST, ONTARIO) THROUGH YO80 (UENTWOBTH, ONTARIO) WERE WEIGHTED BY A FACTOR OF ONE AND ONE-THIRD. RESIDENTS OF t040 (CARTIER, QUEBEC) TBRU CO48 (SAIYT-JACQUES, QUEBEC) (INCLUSIVE), #081 (YORK CENTBE, ONTARIO) THRU CO88 (ROSEDALE, ONTARIO), AND ALL RESPONDENTS FROfl BRITISH COLUBBIA HERE DOUBLE UEIGBTED. THE REST OF THE CONSTITUENCIES ARE UNWEIGHTED. SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 4 AND 6.
TBE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT UNWEIGBTED (RAY) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF DATA CASES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..--.......-..*...-.......-......-.---...
1113 3. UNYEIGHTED CASES 588 4, WEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES t049-1080) 417 6. DOUBLE UEIGRTED (CONSTITUENCIES #040-4048, COBl-
t088, AND till-tll8)
VAR 0004 REF 0004 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-DECINAL BEIGHT VARIABLE NO MISSING DATA CODES
LOC 11 WIDTH 3 DK 4 COL 11-13 2 DEC PLACE(S)
DECIMAL WEIGHT VALUES PLEASE SEE ALSO REP. NOS. 3 AND 6.
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 79
(CONTINUED) _...__.I...
THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT IJNWEIGHTED (RAY) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF DATA CASES.
VAR 0211 REP 0211 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAKE-CRDTST PTY-DULL/EXCITING KD=GE 8
LOC 237 WIDTR 1 DK 4 COL 51
<R'S RATING OF CREDITISTE PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136) ..--.l..l.l..r........-....--.-.--....--.-...,.....
762 1, DULL 481 2. 529 3.
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 94
(CONTINUED) -..---...I.
1714 4,
862 686 t : 991 7. EXCITING
2168 8. DK
VAR 0212 REP 0212 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAKE-CRDTST PTY-YOUNG/OLD KD=GE 8
LOC 238 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 52
<R'S RATING OF CREDITISTE PARTY. SEE REF. NO. 136> ..,.............--.-.-..*............-.-.....-.-..-
1076 l- YOUNG 963 2.
1117 3.
2211 321 ;: 161 6. 165 7. OLD
2179 8. DK
VAR 0213 REP 0213 NANE-CRDTST PTY-SLOW/FAST KD=GE 8
LOC 239 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 53
DATA SET ID-'7225'
<R'S RATING OF CREDITISTE PABTY. SEE REF. NO. 136) ..-.1-...-.-.......................................
456 1. SLOW 467 2. 438 3.
2304 4. 881 5. 740 6. 742 7. FAST
2165 8. DK
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 95
VAR 0214 REF 0214 NAHE-LIBERAL flP-JOB PERFRHNCE ND=GE 8
LOC 240 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 54
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 31. WE'VE TALKED ABOUT TEE PARTIES. I'D ALSO LIKE YOUR OPINIONS OF THE HEBBERS OF PARLIABENT WHICH EACB OF THE PARTIES HAVE SENT TO OTTAWA IN THE LAST FEW YEARS. YOU HAY NOT KNOW TOO HUCH ABOUT THEM, BUT JUST GIVE HE YOUR GENERAL IBPRESSION OF THE JOB 'PREY HAVE BEEN DOING.
A. LET'S START WITH THE LIBERAL BEKBERS OF PARLIANENT. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE JOB TBEY HAVE BEEN DOING-PRETTY GOOD, JUST SO-SO, OR NOT GOOD AT ALL? . . . . . . . . . . ..~.~...~1...~..~.....~..~~..................~....
2848 1. PRETTY GOOD 4208 2. so-so
776 3. NOT GOOD
330 8. DK 31 9. HA
VAR 0215 REP 0215 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CNSVTV HP-JOB PERFRKANCE KD=GE 8
LOC 241 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 55
Q. 31-B. BOW ABOUT THE CONSERVATIVE HEHBERS OF PARLIABENT? HOW HAVE THEY BEEN PRETTY GOOD, SO-SO, OR NOT GOOD AT ALL? <R'S RATING OF THE JOB CONSERVATIVE EP'S HAVE BEEN DOING> <SEE REF. NO. 214> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..s.wm... .-.-......-.1.................-
2277 1. PRETTY GOOD 4154 2. so-so 1253 3. NOT GOOD
465 8. DK 44 9. NA
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
VAR 0216 REP 0216 NAHE-NDP PIP-JOB PERPORBANCE I'lD=GE 8
LOC 242 UIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 56
PAGE 96
DATA SET ID-'72251
Q- 31-C. WHAT ABOUT TEE NDP EEHBERS OF PAELIAKENT? AOU WOULD YOU RATE THEM? <R'S RATING OF THE JOB NDP tip's BAVE BEEN DOING> <SEE REF. ~0. 214) r......-.-....-..........................................
2373 1, PRETTY GOOD 2687 2. so-so 1165 3. NOT GOOD
1923 8. DK 45 9. NA
VAR 0217 REP 0217 NAME-SOCRDT HP-JOB PERFRIANCE BD=GE 8
LOC 243 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 57
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 31-D. AND BOW ABOUT THE SOCIAL CREDIT HEHBEBS OF PARLIAMENT FOLLOWING BR. TEIOEPSON? <E'S RATING OF TEE JOB SOCIAL CREDIT EP'S FOLLOUING TAOHPSON HAVE BEEN DOING> <SEE REF. NO. 21U> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-....---.-.---..--...-.-.-----..
1228 1, PRETTY GOOD 2563 2. so-so 1947 3. NOT GOOD
2421 8. DK 34 9. NA
VAR 0218 REP 0218 NABE-CRDTST NP-JOB PERFBHANCE ED=GE 8
LOC 244 UIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 58
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 31-E. AND FINALLY, RHAT ABOUT TAE CAOUETTE GROUP OF SOCIAL CREDIT BEEBEES OF PARLIAEENT? <R'S EATING OF THE JOB I'IEBBEES OF THE CAOUETTE GROUP HAVE BEEN DOING> <SEE REF. NO. 214> . . . . . . ..*.................--.--...--.-.-.--.-....-..*.-
732 1. PRETTY GOOD
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 97
(CONTINUED) . ..-....I..
1764 2. so-so 2936 3. NOT GOOD
2721 8. DK 40 9. NA
VAR 0219 REF 0219 HAKE-XCUPR CRDTST PTY TO OTRS ID=0 OR GE 8
LOC 245 UIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 59
DATA SET ID-'7225'
ASK QUESTIONS 32 AND 33 <REF. NOS. 219-220) IN QUEBEC. FOR ALL OTBERS GO TO Q. 34 <REF. NO. 221>
Q. 32. (QUEBEC OULY) NOU I’H 6OING TO ASK YOU TUO QUESTIONS ABOUT THE SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY LED BY LIB- CAOUETTE. DO YOU PERSONALLY FEEL THAT, IN TBE LAST FEW YEARS, ON THE UBOLE, THE SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY III OTTABA HAS DONE A BUCB BETTER JOB, A SOKEYHAT BETTER JOB, ABOUT THE SAKE, A SOBEUHAT WORSE JOB, OR A BUCH ROUSE JOB TBAN TBE OTBEB PABTIBS? . . . ..-......-.-.1.......................................-...
246 1. HUCB BETTER 384 2. SOHEIHAT BETTER 807 3. ABOUT TEE SAKE 414 4. SOKEYHAT BORSE 258 5. MUCH UORSE
282 8. DK 9. IA
5802 0. INAP (R IS BOT A QUEBEC RESIDENT)
VAR 0220 REP 0220 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAHE-XCRDTST COME PWR-10 IRS AID=0 OR GE 8
LOC 246 WIDTB 1 DK 4 COL 60
Q. 33. (QUEBEC ONLY) WHAT CBAPCES DO YOU TPIBK THE SOCIAL CREDIT PAMY HAS TO BECOZIE THE PARTY II POBBR IN OTTAYA II TIE NEXT TEN YEARS: A VERY GOOD CIIAUCE, FAIELY GOOD CHAIICE, WOT TOO UUCA OF A CEAUCE 0% EO CLANCC AT ALL? .11.....--.-......_.....-......-. '................,.........
69 1. VERY GOOD 330 2. FAIRLY GOOD 717 3. UOT TOO MUCH CBAWCE
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 98
1119
156
580.2
4. NO CHANCE
8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP (R IS NOT A QUEBEC RESIDENT)
VAR 0221 REP 0221 NAME-R'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION BD=GE 98
LOC 247 WIDTH 2 DK 4 cOL 61-62
DATA SET ID-172251
2045 10. CONSERVATIVE 3043 20. LIBERAL
883 30. NDP 344 40. SOCIAL CREDIT 144 50. CREDITISTE
42 60. UNIOK NATIONALE 16 70. OTHER PARTY
1381 80. NO PARTY
238 98. DK 57 99. NA
Q. 34. (EVERYONE) GEWERALLY SPEAKIRG, DO YOU USUALLY THINK OF YOURSELF AS CONSERVATIYE, LIBERAL, SOCIAL CREDIT, CREDITISTE, NDP, UNION NATIONALE OR WHAT? . . . . ..-.............-..-..............*.....-...........-.-
IF SOHE PARTY IDENTIFICATION CHOSEN, ASK QUESTIONS 35, 36, 37 <REF. NOS. 222-226, 233-234>. IF NO PARTY IDENTIFICATION, ASK QUESTLON 38 <REP. NOS. 227-234>.
VAR 0222 NAflE-XSTRENGTE-R'S
LOC 249 YIDTH
REP 0222 DATA SET ID-'7225' PARTY ID ID=0 OR GE 8
1 DK 4 COL 63
Q. 35. (FOR IDENTIFIERS) EOU STRONGLY (NAHE OF CEOSEN PARTY) DO YOU GENERALLY FEEL-VERY STEONGLY, FAIRLY STRONGLY, OR NOT VERY STRONGLY? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-.-....-.................-...--....--......
1887 1. VERY STRONGLY 3386 2. FAIRLY STRONGLY 1211 3. NOT VERY STRONGLY
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 99
31 59
1619
(CONTINUED) . ..-.1..-..
DK 9": WA 0. INAP (R CODED 80 OR 98 IN REF. NO. 221)
VAR 0223 REF 0223 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAflE-XR'S PAST PARTY ID BD=GE 91
LOC 250 WIDTti 2 DK 4 COL .64-65
3977 00. NO, NEVER FELT CLOSER
955 10. YES, CONSERVATIVE 850 20. YES, LIBERAL 354 30. YES, NDP 108 40. YES, SOCIAL CREDIT
21 50. YES, CREDITISTE 111 80. YES, OTHER
1619 91. INAP (R CODED 0 IN REF. NO. 222) 125 98. DK 73 99. NA
Q. 36-A. (FOR IDENTIFIERS) UAS THERE EVER A TIBE UHEN YOD THOUGHT OF YOURSELF AS CLOSEST TO ANY OTRER PARTY IN CANADA? 36-e. (IF "YES“) UHICE PARTY HAS THAT? . . . . . . . ..-........-....................-....................
VAR 0224 REP 0224 NAtlE-XLEVEL PTY ID-NATYJFVRCL HD-0 OX GE 8
LOC 252 UIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 66
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 37-A. (FOR IDENTIFIERS) UAEN YOU SAT YOU ARE A (NAME OF CAOSEN PARTY) ARE YOU THINKING OF NATIONAL POLITICS, POLITICS HERE IN TXIS PROVINCE, OR BOTH? . . . ..-..--........-+.......................................
1371 1. NATIONAL ORLY 380 2. PROVINCIAL ONLY
4707 3. BOTH
63 8. DK 53 NA
1619 INAP (R CODED 0 IN REF. NO. 222)
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 100
VAR 0225 REP 0225 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-XPVNCL PTY ID-NATL LVL 1 HD=GE 91
LOC 253 YIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 67-68
--FOR IDENTIFIERS-- Q. 37-B. (IF NATIONAL ONLY) HELL, BOY ABOUT POLITICS BERE IN (NABE OF PROVINCE)? HO1 DO YOU THINK OF YOURSELF? . ..-...........-.....--..-....*.-.--............--..-...-.
325 401
2:: 6
54 6
117
::: 30. 40. 50.
E: 80.
CONSERVATIVE LIBERAL NDP SOCIAL CREDIT CREDITXSTE UNIOU NATIONALE OTHER NONE
6769 91. INAP (R CODED 2, 3, 8, OR 0 IN REF. NO. 224) 70 90. DK
108 99. NA
VAR 0226 REF 0226 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAIIE-XNATL PTY ID-PVNCL LVL 1 BD=GE 91
LOC 255 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 69-70
--FOR IDENTIPIERS-- Q. 37-C. (IF PROVINCIAL ONLY) YELL, ROU ABOUT NATIONAL POLITICS? BOY DO YOU THINK OF YOURSELF? . . . . . . . . ..--..-........................................
107 145
36 15
21
10. CONSERVATIVE 20. LIBERAL 30. NDP 40. SOCIAL CREDIT 50. CBEDITISTE 60. UNION NATIOBALE 80. NONE
7760 91. INAP (R CODED 1, 3, 8, OR 0 IN REF. NO. 224) 46 98. DK 63 99. WA
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 101
VA8 0227 REF 0227 NAME-NN.ID-CLOSER TO RCH PTY BD=GE 91
91. INAP, (R CODED 10. 20. 30, 40, 50, 60, OR 70 IN REF. NO. 221)
97. REFUSED 98. DK 99. NA
Q. 38-A.. (FOR NON-IDENTIFIERS) YELL, DO YOU GENERALLY THINK OF YOURSELF AS A LXTTLE CLOSER TO ONE OF THE PARTIES THAN THE OTAERS? Q. 38-B. (IF "YES") UAICH PARTY IS THAT? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
VAR 0228 REP 0228 NABE-XNN.ID-PTY CHOICE NAT/PV ID=0 OR GE 8
LOC 259 UIDTB 1 DK 4 COL 73
DATA SET ID-'7225'
--FOR NON-IDENTIFIERS EHO LEAN-- Q. 38-C. WHEN YOU SAY YOU FEEL CLOSER TO (PARTY BENTIONED) ARE YOU TEINKING OF NATIONAL POLITICS, POLITICS HERE IN THE PROVINCES OR BOTH? . . . . . . . . . ..1...1..~.~.....~..............~.~..~.....~.......
208 65
362
:‘8 7507
1. NATIONAL ONLY 2. PROVIBCIAL ONLY 3. BOTH
DK 9”: NA 0. INAP (E CODED 00, 91, 97, OR 90 IN REP-NO. 227)
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 102
VAR 0229 REP 0229 NAflE-XNN.ID,PV LVL-NATL LVL 1 BD=GE 91
LOC 260 UIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 74-75
DATA SET ID-'7225'
--FOR NON-IDENTIFIERS YHO LEAN-- Q. 38-D. (IF NATIONAL ONLY) NELL HO1 ABOUT POLITICS HERE IN (PROVINCE) TO WHICH PARTY DO YOU GENERALLY FEEL CLOSER? -.-...............-....-.--........-......-.-.......--.*....
35 73 16 27
3
10. CONSERVATIVE 20. LIBERAL 30. NDP 40. SOCIAL CREDIT 50. CREDITISTE 60. UNION NATIONALE 70. OTHER
7947 91. INAP (E CODED 2, 3, 8, OR 0 IN REF. NO. 228) 16 98. DK 76 99. NA
VAR 0230 REF 0230 NAME-XNN.ID,NATL LVL-PV LVL 1 MD=GE 91
LOC 262 WIDTH 2 DK 4 CDL 76-77
DATA SET ID-'7225'
--FOR NON-IDENTIFIERS UHO LEAN-- Q. 38-E. (IF PROVINCIAL ONLY) HOW ABOUT NATIONAL POLITICS? TO WHICH PARTY DO YOU GENERALLY FEEL CLOSER? . . . . ..-.-..-...-.......-.........-......-..-...-...........
3 23
3
8090 26 48
10. CONSERVATIVE ii: LIBERAL
NDP 40. SOCIAL CREDIT 50. CBEDITISTE 70. OTHER
91. INAP (R CODED 1, 3, 8, OR 0 IN REF. NO. 228.) 98. DK 99. NA
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 103
VAR 0231 REP 0231 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAME-XNN.ID-PST PTY CHOICE/ID ID=GE 91
LOC 264 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 78-79
331
143 75 30 19 12
7507 29 47
--FOR NON-IDENTIPIEBS UHO LEAN-- Q. 38-P. UAS THERE EVER A TIHE WHEN YOU FELT CLOSER TO AEY OTHER PARTY? Q. 38-G. (IF "YES") WHICH PARTY WAS THAT? . ..-_.....__1._*._...-.......-....--...--...-....-.-.
00. NO, NEVER FELT CLOSER
10. CONSERVATIVE 20. LIBERAL 30. NDP
2: SOCIAL CREDIT OTHER
91. INAP (R CODED 00, 91, 97, OR 98 IN REP.NO.227) 90. DK 99. NA
VAR 0001 REP 0001 DATA SET ID-'72251 NANE-ICPR STUDY NUNBER-7225 NO HISSING DATA CODES
VAR 0002 REP 0002 DATA SET ID-'7225' NANE-INTERVIEW NUHBER NO NISSING DATA CODES
LOC 5 UIDTH 5 DK 5 COL 5- 9
RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NURBER
THE FIRST DIGIT IDELlTIPIES THE PROVINCE AS CODED IN VARIABLE FIVE; THE NEXT POUR DIGITS ARE THE RESPONDENT'S IDENTI?ICATION NUMBER YITHIN THE PROVINCE. ALL FIVE DIGITS ARE NEEDED TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY A RESPONDENT. . . . . . . . ..-.--.-...-.--------....-..-.-...-..-......*...*-*-.
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 104
VAR 0003 REP 0003 DATA SET I~-'72251 NABE-INTEGER UEIGHT VARIABLE NO EISSING DATA CODES
LOC 10 YIDTH 1 DK 5COLlO
INTEGER UEIGHT VALUES
RESPONDENTS WERE WEIGHTED ACCORDING TO TEEIR CONSTITUENCY OF RESIDENCE. ALL SUBJECTS LIVING IN CONSTITUENCY t049 (ALGOBA WEST, ONTARIO) TREOUGH 11080 (WENTWORTH, ONTARIO) RERE HEIGHTED BY A FACTOR OF OWE AND ONE-THIRD. RESIDENTS OF t040 (CARTIER, QUEBEC) THRU #DUB (SAINT-JACQUES, QUEBEC) (IWCLUSIVE), 1081 (YORK CENTRE, ONTARIO) THRU 1088 (ROSEDALE, ONTARIO), AND ALL RESPONDENTS FROB BRITISH COLUBBIA WERE DOUBLE WEIGHTED. THE REST OF THE CONSTITUENCIES ARE ONWEIGHTED. SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 4 AND 6.
THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT UNYEIGHTED (RAW) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF DATA CASES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-...-.....--.....--...............-...---.
1113 3. UNYEIGHTED CASES 588 4. YEIGBTXD ONE AND OWE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES #049-t080) 417 6. DOUBLE WEIGHTED (CONSTITUENCIES 1040-1048, #081-
1088, AND #Ill-tll8)
VAR 0004 REP 0004 DATA SET YD-'7225' HARE-DECIRAL WEIGHT VAIIIABLE 10 UISSING DATA CODES
LOC 11 YIDTE 3 DK 5 COL 11-13 2 DEC PLACE(S)
DECIlAl. YEIGHT VALUES PLEASE SEE ALSO REF. EOS. 3 AND 6.
THE ?REQUERCYES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT ONWEIGHTED (RAW) IPEQDEBCIES ?OR THE ACTUAL NUBBEX OF DATl CASES.
<TWO DECIEAL PLACES ARE INPLIED> I_-...................----...-----...................--..-
1113 100. UMYEIGliTBD CASES 588 133. YLIGBTED ONE AND Ollt-THIRD (COISTITUERCIES
VAR 0232 REP 0232 NAEE-XTRUE NN.ID-EVER CLS PTY MD=0 OR GE 8
LOC 266 YIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 15
DK 5COL14
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 38-5. (IF DOESN'T FEEL CLOSE IN Q. 38-A <REF. NO. 227)) (FOR NON LEANERS) WAS THERE EVER A TINE WHEN YOU DID THINK OF YOURSELF AS CLOSER TO ONE OF THE PARTIES? _...._............_.....-.-....-.------.--*....-...........
263 1. YES 657 2. NO
79 8. DK 35 9. NA
7159 0. INAP (R CODED lo-80 OR 91 IN REP-NO. 227)
VAR 0233 REP 0233 DATA SET ID-172251 NAME-XHHEN R'S PTY ID CHANGED BD=GE 91
LOC 267 YIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 16-17
QNS. 36-C, 38-H, AND 38-K (EACH RESPONDENT ANSRERED ONLY ONE OF THESE)
Q. 36-C. (IF "YES" IN REF. NO. 223) UHEN DID YOU CHANGE FROH THAT PARTY TO YOUR PRESENT ONE?
Q. 38-R. (IF "YES" IN REP. NO. 231) UHEN DID YOU CHANGE FROB FEELING CLOSER TO TRAT PARTY?
Q. 38-K. (IF "YES" IN REP. NO. 232) WHEN DID YOU ROVE AUAY FROE THAT PARTY? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-......................-....-..-........
359 90
361 508 301 227
71 238
01. 02.
03. 04. 05.
0";: 08.
DURING THE LAST FEDERAL CAEPAIGN LESS THAN 1 YEAR BEFORE (INTERVIEW) BUT BEFORE LAST CAMPAIGN. 1 OR 2 YRS. BEFORE (12 HONTES-35 HONTHS) 3-5 YRS. BBFORE (36 BONTRS-71 MONTHS) 6-9 YRS BEFORB (72 EONTHS-119 CIONTHS) lo-1U IRS. 15-20 YES. 20 IRS. PLUS
5198 91. INAP (R DID NOT SUITCE PARTIES, I.E. CODED 00 OE 98
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 106
IN REP. NO. 223, OR 00 OR 98 IN REF. NO. 231, OR 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 232)
840 99. NO ANSWER, CAN’T REUEBBEA, UNCLEAR
VAR 0234 REP 0234 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAHE-XREASON R CRANGD PTY ID BD=GE 91
LOC 269 WIDTA 2 DK 5 COL 18-19
394 322 445
11. PARTY LEADER OR LEADERS. 12. CANDIDATE. 13. PARTY (DISSATISFIED WITA FORBEELY FAVOURED PARTY OR
ATTRACTED BY OTAEB PARTY) BEW OR OLD. 337 14. GENERAL PLATPORR AND PROGRAB OF PARTY OR CANDIDATE.
SPECIFIC ISSUES
42 19
445 9
165 70
15. HAJORITY. 16. LACK OF LEADERSHIP. 17. OTBBRS. 18. LACK OF STABILITY. 19. NEEDED CHANGE IN GOVERNBENT. 20. SWITCHED ALLEGIANCE BECAUSE HE FELT HIS PARTY HAD
NO CBANCE. 155
63 33
5198
496
21. OTHER NON-POLITICAL REASONS, X-G, INFLUENCE OF ANOTHER PERSON OB GEOGRAPHICAL AREA.
22. UNKEPT PROMISES. 23. UNEBPLOYBENT.
91. INAP. (CODED 91 IN REF. NO. 233) 98. IRRELEVANT ANSWERS, DON'T KNOW, REFUSE. 99. NO ANSWER OR NOT APPLICABLE.
QNS. 36-D, 38-1, AND 38-L. (EACH RESPONDENT ANSWERED ONLY ONE OF THESE QUESTIONS.)
Q. 36-D. (IF "YES" IN REP. NO. 223) WHAT WAS THE MAIN THING THAT UADE YOU CHANGE?
Q. 38-I. (IF "YES" IN REP. NO. 231) WAAT WAS THE MAIN THING THAT MADE YOU CHANGE?
Q. 38-L. (IF "YES" IN REP. NO. 232) WHAT WAS THE MAIN THING THAT BADE YOU HOVE AWAY PROM TRE PARTY? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-.....-.......................
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 107
VAR 0235 REP 0235 DATA SET ID-'72251 ABBE-SECOND CHOICE FDRL PTY flD=GE 8
LOC 271 WIDTR 1 DK 5 COL 20
1074
1730 1666 1721
616 151
34
0. NO SECOND CHOICE
1. CONSERVATIVE 2. LIBERAL 3. NDP 4. SOCIAL CREDIT
2 CREDITISTE OTHER
1152 8. DK 49 9. NA
VAR 0236 REP 0236
Q. 39. (EVERYBODY) IF AT THIS TIHE YOU HAD TO VOTE FOR ONE OF THE OTHER FEDERAL PARTIES, WHICH ONE WOULD BE YOUR SECOND CHOICE? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..--...1..-........-.-...--..-.--...........
NABE-LAST CHOICE FEDERAL PTY BD=GE 7 LOC 272 YIDTR 1 DK 5COL21
DATA SET ID-'72251
Q. 40. WHICR OF TBE FEDERAL PARTXES TODAY WOULD YOO LEAST WANT TO VOTE POR? ..-.-............._.........*........*.........---.-.-*.*.
792 1. CONSERVATIVE 565 2. LIBERAL 952 3. NDP
1229 4. SOCIAL CREDIT 2948 5. CREDITISTE
160 6. OTR ER
6 7. REFUSED 1504 8. DK
37 9. WA
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
VAR 0237 REP 0237 NAME-WCH NOST IMP VT:LDR,PTY ED=GE 80
LOC 273 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 22-23
PAGE 108
DATA SET ID-'72251
Q. 41. ON THE WHOLE, WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS NOST IMPORTANT TO YOU WHEN YOU VOTE? THE CANDIDATE RUNNING IN YOUR RIDING, TEE PIETY ITSELF, OR THE PARTY'S LEADER? <GEONETRIC CODE> . . . . . . . . . ..-....._.1......-..............--.-...- -.a.....
2349 01. PARTY 1652 02. LEADER
422 03. PARTY AND LEADER EQUALLY 2458 04. CANDIDATE
267 05. PARTY AND CANDIDATE 204 06. LEADER AND CANDIDATE 196 08. PROGRAU 130 09. PARTY AND PROGRACI EQUALLY 194 10. LEADER AND PROGRAH EQUALLY 156 12. CANDIDATE AND PROGRAN
4 80. OTHER CONBINATIONS 161 98. DK
VAR 0238 REP 0238 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAIE-VOTE UN BAD CAND,GD PTY MD=GE 0
LOC 275 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 24
Q. 42. SUPPOSE THERE WAS AN ELECTION IN WHICH THE PARTY YOU FAVOUR RAN A CANDIDATE IN YOUR RIDING WHOM YOU DID NOT LIKE OR DID NOT AGREE WITH PHAT WOULD YOU BE HOST LIKELY TO DO? VOTE FOR THE CANDIDATE ANYWAY? OR NOULD YOU PROBABLY NOT VOTE AT ALL? . . . . . . . . . . . ..--......--....................-........-.-.--..
3243 1. CANDIDATE 2726 2. OTHER PARTY 1527 3. WON'T VOTE
667 8. DK 30 9. RI
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
VAR 0239 REP 0239 NAME-VOTE UN BAD PLCY,GD PTY BD=GE 8
LOC 276 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 25
PAGE 109
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q- 43. SUPPOSE THERE WAS AN ELECTION IN WAICH THE PARTY YOU PREFER WAS IN FAVOUR OF SOME POLICY YOU DID NOT LIKE OR DID NOT AGREE WITH. WAAT WOULD YOU BE KOST LIKELY TO DO? VOTE FOR THE PARTY'S CANDIDATE ANYWAY? CONSIDER ANOTHER PARTY'S CANDIDATE? OR WOULD YOU PROBABLY NOT VOTE? . . . . . . . . . . . ..-..-.1--.--.-............-....-..--........-.-.
2111 1. CANDIDATE 3015 2, OTHER PARTY 1343 3. WON'T VOTE 1041 4. IT DEPENDS, QUALIFIED
654 8. DK 29 9. NA
VAR 0240 REP 0240 NAME-FATHER'S INTST IN POLT BD=GE 8
LOC 277 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 26
DATA SET ID-'7225'
3176 1. VERY INTERESTED 2849 2. SOBEWHAT INTERESTED 1558 3. DID NOT PAY EUCB ATTENTION
213 4. DID NOT LIVE UITH FATHER
390 8, DK 7 9. WA
Q. 44. DO YOU REREBBER, WHEN YOU WERE GROWING, UP, WHETHER YOUR FATHER WAS VERY OUCH INTERESTED IN POLITICS, SONEWHAT INTERESTED, OR DIDN'T HE PAY BUCH ATTENTION TO IT? ..11....................--.-.-.-.-........--.-.....-.-...-.
VAR 0241 REP 0241 NABE-FATHER'S PTY PREFERENCE lD=GE 60
LOC 278 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 27-28
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 45-A. DID YOUR FATEEL? HAVE ANY PARTICULAR PREFERENCE FOR OUE OF THE PEDEEAL POLITICAL PARTIES WHEN YOU WERE YOUUG? Q- 45-B. (IF "YES") WHICH PARTY WAS THAT? . . . ..I.................-..-.-.--.-.......-...-...-.-.--...~.
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 110
(CONTINUED) -.-*...1*..
2093 00. NO PREFERENCE
2120 10. CONSERVATIVE 2497 20. LIBERAL
267 30. CCP 88 40. SOCIAL CREDIT
43 60. OTHER 405 80, NOT CANADIAN PARTY
213 91. INAP (R CODED 4 IN REF. NO. 240) 320 98. DK 147 99. HA
VAR 0242 REF 0242 NAHE-KOTHER'S INTST IN POLT tlD=GE 8
LOC 280 WIDTA 1 DK 5 COL 29
DATA SET ID-'72251
Q. 46. UHEN YOU WERE GROWING UP, WAS YOUR EOTHER VERY EUCH INTERESTED IN POLITICS, SOBEWHAT INTERESTED, OR DIDN'T SHE PAY BUCH ATTENTION TO IT? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..--........*..........................
1161 1. VERY INTERESTED 2447 2. SOMEWHAT IETERESTED 3872 3. DXD NOT PAY UUCH ATTENTION
267 4. DID NOT LIVE WITH EOTXBR
446 8. DK 9. NA
VAR 0243 REP 0243 NAHE-HOTHER'S PTY PREFERENCE HD=GE 60
LOC 281 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 30-31
DATA SET ID-'72251
Q. 47-A. WHEN YOU WERE YOUNG, DID YOUR MOTHER HAVE ANY PREFERENCE FOE ORE OF THE FEDERAL POLITICAL PARTIES? Q- 47-B. (IF "YES") UHICH PARTY HAS THAT? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-........
3525 00. NO PREFERENCE
1539 10. CONSERVATIVE
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 111
(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . I . . .
20. 30. 40.
LIBERAL CCF SOCIAL CREDIT
1956 198
67
9 60. 262 80.
267 189 181
E: 99.
VAR 0244 REP 0244
OTHER NOT CANADIAN PARTY
SNAP (R CODED 4 IN REF. NO. 242) DK NA
NAHE-RHBR NAHE ELECTED CAND ID=9 LOC 283 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 32
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 48. DO YOU HAPPEN TO YtEHEKBER.THE NAIYE OF THE CANDZDATE WHO PAS ELECTED TO PAELXAEERT FOR TNIS RIDING IN THE NOVEBBER ~TR, ELECTION? . ..-......-...1..-1.---.....-.....--..*.-.......-......~...
6153 YES, CORRECT 194 :: YES, INCORRECT
1443 3. NO, DO NOT REBEKBEE 394 4. NOT SURE
9 9. NA
VAR 0245 REP 0245 NAEE-RBBR PARTY ELECTED CAUD nD=9
LOC 284 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 33
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 49. DO YOU HAPPEN TO KNOW HIS (HER) <ELECTED BP> PARTY? _.....___.-_...1....--.--.----..-...-.--.---.....-.*....---
6947 1. YES, CORRECT 188 2. YES, INCORRECT 802 3. NO, DO NOT KNOR 248 4. NOT SURE
8 9. NA
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 112
VAR 0246 REP 0246 NAHE-READ/HEARD ABOUT CAND BD=GE 8
LOC 285 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 34
DATA SET ID-'72251
Q. 50-A. (IF R GAVE IUCOERECT ANSKEES OR DID NOT KNOW, NAHE AND PARTY READ BY INTERVIEUER) HAVE YOU EVER READ OR HEARD ANYTHING ABOUT BIH (HER) <ELECTED BP>? -......................-.-...--.--...-....-......-....-..
4793 1. YES 2689 2. NOT BEARD ANYTHING
694 3. NOT SURE
8. DK 17 9. WA
VAR 0247 REP 0247 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAME-XTYPE OF INFO R/H ABT EP BD=O OR GE 9
LOC 286 YIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 35
Q. 50-B. WHAT UAS TBAT <B READ OR BEARD ABOUT ELECTED HP>? . ..-..........r....-....-..-..-...............-...-...--.-.
(ANSWERS TO THIS QUESTION ARE CODED ACCORDING TO WBETHER OR NOT TBE RESPONDENT IS ABLE TO BACK UP BIS CLAXH IN 50-A. ANSYERS WERE AIBED AT TEE SOURCE OF INPORBATION OR THE CONTENT. ALL SOURCE ORIENTED RESPONSES WERE CODED 1 (PANPBLETS, NEWSPAPER ARTICLES, T.V., ETC.). ALL CONTENT ANSWERS UEBE EVALUATED ACCORDING TO THE CODING SCBEBE. IN CASES OF DOUBT THE RESPONDENT HAS ALUAYS GIVEN THE BENEFIT OF A 1 CODE.)
3838 U27
518
10 3400
1. BENTIONS SOBETBING SPECIFIC. 2. GIVES VAGUE GENERAL ANSUER.
8. CAN NOT REBEHBER, REFUSES
9. NA 0. QUESTION IS MOT APPLICABLE (R CODED 2, 3, 8, OR 9 IE
REF. NO. 246)
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 113
VAR 0248 REP 0248 NARE-WAS CANDIDATE INCUMBENT tiD=9
LOC 287 YIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 36
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 51-A. DO YOU HAPPEN TO KNOW YHETHER RE (SBE) WAS ALREADY IN PARLIABENT JUST BEFORE THIS ELECTION? . . ..-_...1____...._._---.------.--...-----.----..--...........-....
lr998 1. IN PARLIABENT, CORRECT 271 2. IN PARLIABENT, INCOBEECT
1468 3. NOT IN PARLIABENT, COREECT 197 4. NOT IN PARLIABENT, INCORRECT
6 5. OTHER
1253 8. DK
9. NA
VAR 0249 BEF 0249 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAHE-XCAND AIDED CONSTITUENCY ID=0 OR GE 8
LOC 288 RIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 37
Q. 51-B. (IF IN PARLIAHENT, CORRECT) DO YOU REBEBBER ANYTHING THAT (NAME OF BENBER) HAS DONE FOR TAE PEOPLE OF THIS CONSTITUENCY? ..-.........1........-.--....---.-.--.-.-..-.--..-.....-.
1272 1. YES 966 2. DID NOTHING
2746 8. DK 14 9. HA
3195 0. INAP. (R CODED 2-8 IN REP, NO. 248)
VAR 0250 REF 0250 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-XCAND AIDED R/R'S PAHILY BD=O OR GE 8
LOC 289 UIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 38
Q. 51-D. HAS HE (SHE) EVER DONE ANYTHING FOR YOU OR YOUR FAMILY PERSONALLY? . ..-...................-.................-......-..-..-.-
193 1. YES 4758 2. DONE NOTHING
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 114
(CONTINUED) . . ..I. * . . . .
8. DK 47 9. NA
3195 0. INAP (R CODED 2-8 IN REF. NO. 248)
VAB 0251 REP 0251 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAKE-OTHER DIST CANDS--NAilE KD=O OR GE 9 BULT RESPS 4
LOC 290 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 39-42
FOR EACH NABE ELICITED BY Q. 52-A (REP-NO, 251). THE RESPOND- ENT WAS ASKED QS. 52-B AND 52-C (REPsNOSe 252-253). CORBENTS ABOUT THE FIRST INDIVIDUAL BENTIONED ARE ALWAYS CODED AS THE FIRST RESPONSE IN EACH OF THESE THREE VARIABLES (REF. NOS. 251-253) m CORMENTS ABOUT THE SECOND INDIVIDUAL ARE CODED IN THE SECOND RESPONSE, ETC.
Q- 52-A. DO YOU REBEBBER THE NABES OF ANY OTHER CANDIDATES RUNNING FOR ELECTION ON NOVEMBER 8TH PBOR THIS RIDING? . . . . . . ..-.--..._.1_._.--.----..-.-....*........................
1. CORRECT 2. INCORRECT 4. DK NAME BUT KNOWS THR PARTY 8. DK
NA INAP (NO FURTHER
THE FREQUENCIES FOR REP.
RESP # CODES--> (1) 1 4738 2 2296 3 442 4 91
RESPONSE)
NO. 251 FOLLOP
(2) (4)
Bf BESPOUSE:
(8) (9) (0) 439 203 2813 173 231 3 5490
70 88 7593 11 9 8082
VAR 0252 RXF 0252 DATA SET ID-'7225' NARE-OTHER DIST CAKDS--PARTY ID=0 OR GE 9 BULT RESPS 4
VAR 0253 EEF 0253 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-OTHER DIST CANDS--RD/BRD ID=0 OR GE 8 MULT RESPS 0
LOC 298 YIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 47-50
Q- 52-C. HAVE YOU BEAD OR HEARD AIYTEIXG ABOUT HII (HER) <I.E., OTHER UNSUCCESSFUL CANDIDATES FRO1 R'S RIDING>? *--..............--.............................-..-..-..
1. YES 2. NO 3. ROT SURE
8. DA 9. IA 0, INAP (NO FURTRER RESPOXSE)
THE FREQUGNCIES FOR REF. NO. 253 FOLLOH BY BESPOBSE:
VAR 0254 REP 0254 NARE-RGLR VTR IN FDRL ELCTN BD=GE 8
LOC 302 UIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 51
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 53. IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS SINCE YOU HAVE BEEN OLD ENOUGH TO VOTE IN CANADA, WOULD YOU SAY THAT YOU HAVE VOTED IN ALL OF THEB, MOST OF TBEB, SOBE OF THEM, OR NONE OF THEH? -1.......-.........-...-.....-.-.-.....--..........-.-*-...
4550 1. VOTED IN ALL 2292 2. VOTED IN BOST 1072 3. VOTED IN SOHE
251 4. VOTED IN NONE
21 8. DK 7 9. WA
VAR 0255 REP 0255 NAUE-XFDRL ELCTN-VT SAKE PTY? ID=0 OR GE 8
LOC 303 UIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 52
DATA SET ID-'7225'
IF RESPONDENT HAS EVER VOTED IN A FEDERAL ELECTION-ASK Q. 54-A <REF. NO. 255>. FOR ALL OTHERS, GO TO Q. 55 <REP, NO. 257>.
Q- 58-A. (FOR THOSE 180 HAVE VOTED IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS) RAVE YOU ALWAYS VOTED FOR THE SAME PARTY, OR HAVE YOU VOTED FOR DIPPEREAT PARTIES? . . . ..-...................-....-..........................*.
3626 4262
33 272
1. VOTED FOR SAUE PARTY 2. VOTED FOR DIFFERENT PARTIES
8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP, (B CODED 4 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 254)
VAR 0256 REP 0256 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAKE-XFDRL ELCN-VT UCH SK PTY ID=0 OR GE 7
LOC 304 WIDTH 1 DK 5 CDL 53
Q. 54-B. (IF SAME PARTY) RRICH PARTY IS THAT <R HAS ALWAYS VOTED FOR IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS>? . ..-..1-1..-1..........-...............*-.....-.........-*.
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 117
VAR
VAR
(CONTINUED) . . . . . . ..I..
1169 1915
279 105 29
16
113 4567
1. CONSERVATIVE 2. LIBERAL 3. NDP 2 SOCIAL CREDIT
OTHER
7. REFUSED 0. DK 9. 11A 0. INAP.; (R CODED 2, 9 OR 0 IN EEP. NO. 255)
0257 REP 0257 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-RGLR VTR IN PVNCL ELCTN BD=GE 8
LOC 305 YIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 54
Q. 55. IN PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS SINCE YOU HAVE BEEN OLD ENOUGR TO VOTE, WOULD YOU SAY THAT YOU AAVE VOTED IN ALL OF THEM, BOST OF THEN, SOHE OF TAEB, OR NONE OF THEH? . . . . ..I..........--...-..-.......*-.---..-..-...-.-........
3830 1. VOTED IN ALL 2344 VOTED IN HOST 1142 32: VOTED IN SOBE
788 4. VOTED IN NONE
79 0. DK 10 9. NA
0258 REP 0258 NAHE-XPVNL ELCTN-VT SAUE PTY? ID=0 OR GE 8
LOC 306 RLDTH 1 DK 5 COL 55
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 56-A. (FOR TROSE EHO HAVE VOTED IN PROVINCIAL ELECTIOBS) IN PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS, EAVE YOU ALWAYS VOTED FOR THE SAKE PARTY. OR HAVE YOU VOTED FOR DIFFERENT PARTIES? . . . ..-~-..~*........rlll....-........................--..~.~.-..
3930 1. VOTED FOR SAKE PARTY 3368 2. VOTED FOR DIFFERENT PARTIES
0. DK 10 9. NA
877 0. INAP (E CODED 4, 0 OR 9 IN REP. NO. 257)
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 118
VAR 0259 REP 0259 NAIIE-XPVNL ELCN-1T WCH SK PTY HD=O OR GE 7
LOC 307 YIDTA 1 DK 5 COL 56
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 56-B. (IF SAKE PARTY) YHICH PARTY IS THAT <R HAS ALYAYS VOTED FOR XN PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS>? . . . ..~...-~.~.1..1.-.~~.~...................-...-...-....-.
1234 1. CONSERVATIVE 1710 2. LIBERAL
293 3. NDP 273 4. SOCIAL CREDIT 120 5. UNION NATIONALE
13 6. OTHER
22 7. REFUSED 8. DK
273 9. NA 4255 0. INAP (R CODED 2, 9 OR 0 IN REF. NO. 258)
VAR 0260 REP 0260 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-QUEBEC VT '62 FDRL ELCTB RD=GE 91
LOC 308 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 57-58
Q. 59-A. (QUEBEC ONLY) IN TRE LAST THREE FEDERAL ELECTIONS- IN 1962, 1963, AND NOVEBBER BTE OF THIS/LAST YEAR, 18. CAOUETTE'S SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY OBTAINED A LARGE SHARE OF TtiE QUEBEC VOTE. YE WOULD LIKE TO KNOU IF YOU VOTED SOCIAL CREDIT IN ANY OF THESE ELECTIONS. YOUR ANSWERS ARE OF COURSE COBPLETELY CONFIDENTIAL. DID YOU HAPPEN TO VOTE FOR THE SOCIAL CREDIT CANDIDATE IN TRE 1962 FEDERAL ELECTION-TEIE FIRST ONE IN UHICH MR. CAOUETTE'S PARTY DID SO YELL? (Q. 59-B). (IF VOTED BUT NOT SOCIAL CREDIT) UHICH PARTY DID YOU VOTE FOR?
<THE DATA FOR QUESTIONS 59-A AND 59-B UERE COHBINED INTO ONE VARIABLE.> . ..-.._..-..*............--.--....-.-----.--........-....--.
66 00. DID NOT VOTE IN 1962
354 11. YES VOTED, CONSERVATIVE 1056 12. YES VOTED, LIBERAL
12 16. YES VOTED, OTHER 81 17. YES VOTED, REFUSED WHICH PARTY
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 119
(CONTINUED) . . . . . s . . . . m
72 18. YES VOTED, DK UHICH PARTY 60 19. YES VOTED, HA UHICH PARTX
5802 91. INAP, (R DOES NOT RESIDE IN QUEBEC) 141 96. INELIGIBLE TO VOTE, E.G., TOO YOUNG, NOT A CITIZEN
69 97. REFUSED TO ANSWER 54 98. DK IF VOTED 15 99. NA
VAR 0261 REP 0261 DATA SET ID-'7225' NANE-VOTE IN 1963 FDRL ELCTN flD=GE 96
LOC 310 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 59-60
959 00. DID NOT VOTE IN 1963
2133 3064
716 258
11. YES VOTED. CONSERVATIVE 12. YES VOTED, LIBERAL 13. YES VOTED, NDP 14. YES VOTED, SOCIAL CREDIT (BR. CAOUETTE'S) 15. YES VOTED, SOCIAL CREDIT (BR. THOBPSON'S) 16. YES VOTED, OTHER PARTX 17. YES VOTED, REFUSED UHICB PARTY 18. YES VOTED, DK WHICH PARTX 19. YES VOTED. NA UBICH PARTX
114 7
232 254
74
129 78 54
121
Q. 57-A. (ALL EXCEPT QUEBEC) THE LAST FEDERAL ELECTION BEFORE THE ONE IN NOVEMBER UAS IN 1963. DO XOU REBEBBEE FOR SURE WHETHER OR NOT YOU VOTED IN THAT ELECTION? Q. 57-B. (ALL EXCEPT QUEBEC) (IF VOTED) UAICH PARTY DID YOU VOTE FOR?
Q. 60-A. (QUEBEC ONLY) DID YOU HAPPER TO VOTE FOR THE SOCIAL CREDIT CANDIDATE IN THE FEDERAL ELECTION IR 1963, THE ONE IN UHICH MR. PEARSON'S GOVERRBENT WAS ELECTED? Q. 60-B. (QUEBEC OKLY) (IF VOTED BUT NOT SOCIAL CREDIT) WHXCA PARTY DID YOU VOTE FOR?
96. INELIGIBLE TO VOTE, E.G., TOO YOUNG, NOT A CITIZEN 97. REFUSED 98. DK IF VOTED IN 1963 99. NA
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
VAR 0262 REP 0262 NARE-VOTE IN 1965 FDRL ELCTN BD=GE 97
LOC 312 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 61-62
PAGE 120
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 58-A. (ALL EXCEPT QUEBEC) IN TALKING TO PEOPLE ABOUT THIS PAST NOVEBBER ELECTION, UE FIND THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE WEREN'T ABLE TO VOTE BECAUSE THEY UERE SICK, OR DIDN'T HAVE TIBE, OR HAD SOHE OTHER REASON FOR NOT VOTING. HOW ABOUT YOU? DID YOU VOTE THIS TIME OR DID SOBETHING KEEP YOU FROB VOTING? Q. 58-B. (ALL EXCEPT QUEBEC) (IF VOTED) FOR WHICH PARTY DID YOU VOTE?
Q. 61-A. (QUEBEC ONLY) BOW ABOUT THE ELECTION ON UOVEBBER STH. DID YOU VOTE THIS TIBE OR DID SOMETHING KEEP YOU FROK VOTING? Q. 61-B. (IF "YES It VOTED) DID YOU VOTE SOCIAL CREDIT? Q. 61-C. (QUEBEC ONLX) (IF "NO" DID ROT VOTE SOCIAL CREDIT) AHICH PARTY DID YOU VOTE FOR?
<DATA FOR QUESTIONS 58-A, SE-B, 61-A, 61-8, AND 61-C WERE COMBINED IN REF. NO. 262> -...........1.-...1_.-..-..-..*......-.--.--..-...-......-..
1135 00. NO DID NOT VOTE IN 1965
2026 11. YES VOTED, CONSERVATIVE 3156 12. XES VOTED, LIBERAL
45 16. YES VOTED, OTAER PARTY 294 17. XES VOTED, REFUSED UBICA PARTY
32 18. YES VOTED, DK WHICH PARTY 31 19. XES VOTED, NA REICH PARTX
60 97. REFUSED 12 98. DK IF VOTED IN 1965 23 99. NA
VAR 0263 REP 0263 NAME-XUN R DECIDED HOU TO VT BD=GE 80
LOC 314 UIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 63-64
DATA SET ID-'7225'
QNS. 58-C AND 61-D. WHEN DID YOU DECIDE HOU YOU WERE BEST GOING TO VOTE?
<DATA FROM QUESTIONS 58-C AND 61-D WERE COUBINED IN REF. NO.
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 121
(CONTINUED) . . . . - . ..I..
263> ..I.
2317
815 799 688 614 310 185 320
18
992 1135
(ALL ANSWERS ARE TO BE TRANSLATED INTO TIRE. EXABPLE, DECIDED AFTER HEARING SPEAKERS BECORES "DURING CAHPAIGN- TIBE UNSPECIFIED." WHERE THIS IS IHPOSSIBLE, ANSWERS ARE "IRRELEVANT.")
00. DECISION BADE PRIOR TO START OF ELECTION. ANSWERS SUCH AS, "ALREADY KNEW", "LONG BEFORE ELECTION", OR “AS SOON AS ELECTION DATE ANNOUNCED".
10. ALWAYS VOTE SAME (THUS DECISION ALWAYS BADE) 20. EARLY IN CAMPAIGN. 30. DURING CABPAIGN-TIHE UNSPECIFIED. 40, LATE IN CARPAIGN. 50. FEW DAYS BEFORE. 60. ELECTION DAY. 70. IN POLLIUG BOOTH OR STATION.
HO. OTHERS.
90. IRRELEVANT ANSWRRS. CAN'T REEEIBER. 91. INAP. ( R DID NOT VOTE IN 1965). 99. NA
VAR 0264 REP 0264 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAUE-XEASY/NOT DCSN 1965 VOTE RD=O OR GE 9
LOC 316 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 65
QNS. 58-D AND 61-E. YAS IT AN EASY DECISION OR NOT?
<DATA FROt4 QUESTIONS 58-D AND 61-F WERE COMBINED IN REF. NO. 264> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-......................................-..
5473 1. EASY DECISION 1564 2. NOT AN EASY DECISION
21 9. IA 1135 0. INAP (E CODED 00 IN REF. NO. 262>
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 122
VAR 0265 REF 0265 NABE-XUHY '65 VT DCSN NT EASY HD=GE 91
LOC 317 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 66-67
VAR 0266 REP
405
84 12. 20 13.
110 14. 71 15. 60 16. 96 17. 47 18.
118 19. 273 20.
66 21.
6608 91. 143 97.
84 99.
DATA SET ID-'7225'
QNS. 58-E AND 61-P. IF THE DECISION ON HOW TO VOTE WAS NOT AN EASY ONE, WHY NOT?
11. LACK OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PARTIES, PLATFORB OR CANDIDATES: ALL PARTIES BAD. AND KINDRED.
CONFLICT BETREER PAST PARTY ATTACHBENTS AND SPECIFIC ISSUES (SUCH AS) . . _
BAJORITY GOVERNHENT. CORRUPTION. LEADER. FACT THAT HIS PARTY HAD NO CAANCE. OTHER. CANDIDATE. GENERAL PAST PERFOREANCES OR PLATFORM OF A PARTY. LACK OF INFORBATION. OTHER. BOTR CANDIDATES WERE GOOD.
INAP (R CODED 0 OR 1 IN REP-NO. 264) IRRELEVANT, REFUSES. NO ANSWER
NAHE-XUSED AID REAIEHBER CAND 0266 DATA SET ID-'72259 ID=0 OR GE 8
LOC 319 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 68
QNS. 58-F AND 61-G. DID YOU HAPPEN TO BRING ANYTHING-LIKE A POSTCARD-WHEN YOU WENT TO VOTE, IN ORDER TO HELP YOU REMEHBER WHO THE CANDIDATES WERE?
<DATA FROM QUESTIONS 58-F AND 61-G WERE COHBINED IU REF. NO. 266) ..__..____..--..._.1-.--..-....-.-.-.......-..............-.
453 1. YES 6483 2. NO
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 123
(CONTINUED) .-..-.-s.w.
60 8. DK 62 9. NA
1135 0. INAP (CODED 00 IN REF. NO. 262)
VAR 0267 REP 0267 NANE-Y CHNG VT FROM 63 TO 65 ID=GE 91
LOC 320 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 69-70
DATA SET ID-'72251
Q. 62. I NOTICE THAT YOU CAANGED YOUR VOTE FROH 1963 TO 1965. WAS THERE ANY SPECIAL REASON FOR CRANGING TRE PARTY YOU VOTED FOR? . . . . . . . . . . . ..-.-..................................-.......
28 11. PARTY BAD NO CHANCE. 61 12, DISENCAANTED WITH HIS PARTY. 98 13. DISENCEANTED UITR TYO OLD'PARTIES AND/OR RANTED TO
GIVE A CHANCE TO A NEW PARTY. 113 14. PARTY LEADER OR LEADERS. 204 15. CANDIDATE OR EIS PROGRAR.
ISSUES-SPECIFIC
70 3
42 51 51 44 73 10
5869 91, INAP. (R VOTED FOR TRE SAIYE PARTY IN 1963 AND 1965) 162 97. IRRELEVANT ANSWER, REFUSES.
1314 99. DON'T KNOW OR NO ANSUEE
16. 17. 18. 19. 20.
::: 23.
MAJORITY GOVERNHENT. CORRUPTION. SOCIAL SECURITY ISSUE. OTHERS. NEEDED CHANGE IN GOVERNBENT. OTRERS. PARTY PLATFORM OR PROGRAE. NON POLITICAL REASONS-INFLUENCE OF OTHER PERSON, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA OR NO CANDIDATE FOR RIS PARTY.
VAR 0268 REP 0268 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAEE-R'S REASON FOR 1965 VOTE HD=GE 91
LOC 322 WIDTA 2 DK 5 COL 71-72
Q. 63. (ASK OF THOSE ERO VOTED IN NOYEBBER ELECTION. IF DID NOT VOTE GO TO Q. 64 <REF. NO. 269>). NOY ABOUT YOUR VOTE IN THE UOVEHBER ELECTION.
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 124
513 11. TRADITIONAL VOTE. 182 12. NEEDED CHANGE.
530 13. 136 14.
80 15. 169 16.
1211 17. 382 18. 590 19.
1171 20. 242 21. 154 22.
SPECIFIC ISSUES HAJORITY. SOCIAL SECURITY. SCANDAL. OTHERS. PARTY (FOR ONE OR AGAINST ANOTHER). PARTY LEADER OR LEADERS. PARTY PLATPORl'I OR PROGRAM. CANDIDATE. OTAERS.
892 23. 146 24.
NON-POLITICAL REASONS, INFLUENCE OF OTHER PERSON OR GEOGRAPRICAL AREA OR NO CANDIDATE FOR HIS PARTY. NO SPECIAL REASON. GIVE CHANCE TO A NEW PARTY OR PROTEST VOTE.
1135 91. INAP, (DID NOT VOTE IN 1965) 290 97. IRRELEVANT, REFUSES 370 99. NO ANSWER
(CONTINUED) .a* . . . . . . . .
WAS THERE ANY SPECIAL REASON FOR VOTIRG THE WAY YOU DID? . . . . . . ..-..-....._.-................-...-..-.-.
VAR 0269 REP 0269 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAUE-VOTE LAST PROVNCL ELCTA HD=GE 97
LOC 324 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 73-74
Q. 64. (EVERYONE) NOY LET ME END THIS DISCUSSION OF HOW YOU VOTED PITH ONE HORE QUESTION, THIS TIBE ON PROVINCIAL POLITICS. FOR RRICH PARTY DID YOU HAPPEN TO VOTE IN THE LAST PROVINCIAL ELECTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-..-.-.--...---.....-...................--.
1175 00. DID NOT VOTE
1973 11. CONSERVATIVE 2725 12. LIBERAL
587 13. NDP/CCF 561 14. SOCIAL CREDIT 195 15. UNION NATIONALE
6 16. OTHER
373 97. REFUSED 566 98. DK
.
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 125
32
(CONTINUED) . . . . se . . . . -
99. NA
VAR 0270 REP 0270 NAME-MOST IHP TYPE ELECTION ID=GE 8
LOC 326 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 75
2840 1. NATIONAL ELECTIONS 1473 2. PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS
588 3. LOCAL ELECTIONS 400 4. NATIONAL AND PROVINCIAL
56 5. NATIONAL AND LOCAL 75 6. PROVINCIAL AND LOCAL
2506 7. ALL EQUALLY
228 8. CAN'T CHOOSE 27 9. NA
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 65. UHILE HOST PEOPLE THINK IT IS IHPORTANT TO VOTE IN ALL ELECTIONS IT ISN'T ALYAYS POSSIBLE TO DO SO. IF IT WERE NECESSARY TO HAKE A CHOICE, IN WHICH KIND OF ELECTION WOULD YOU SAY IT WAS HOST IflPORTAUT TO VOTE? LOCAL ELECTIONS, NATIONAL ELECTION, OR PROVINCIAL ONES? .-..-....-.................-...........-............-.-.---.
VAR 0271 REP 0271 NAME-CAl'lPAIGN lTGS ATTENDED HD=GE 8
LOC 327 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 76
1255 6938
DATA SET ID-'72251
Q. 66-A. NOW I'N GOING TO ASK YOU ABOUT SOME THINGS WHICA PEOPLE DO THAT HELP A PARTY OR CANDIDATE YIN AN ELECTION. I WONDER IF YOU COULD TELL NE WHETHER YOU DID ANY OF TBESE THINGS DURING THE CAHPAIGN FOR TRE NOVEHBER ELECTION- DID YOU ATTEND ANY POLITICAL HEETINGS OR GATHERINGS DURING THE CAHPAIGN? . . . . . . . ..-.-..-..-.---..--.-.----...-.-.---.............*.
1. YES, ATTENDED NEETINGS 2. NO, DID HOT ATTEND
8. DK 9. NA
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 126
VAR 0272 REP 0272 NAME-XI CAEPAIGN RTGS ATTENDD ?ID=GE 91
LOC 328 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 77-78
127 467 301 174
82 21 28
9 9
16 9
02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 10. 12. 20.
NO MEETINGS ATTENDED ONE EEETING ATTENDED TWO EEETINGS ATTENDED
6938 91. INAP. (CODED 2 OR 0 IN RBF. NO. 271) 9 96. DK HOP HAUY EEETIIIGS ATTENDED 3 99. NA
VAR 0273 REP 0273 DATA SET ID-'7225' NARE-READ PARTY EATERIAL IID=GE 8
LOC 330 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 79
DATA SET ID-'72251
Q- 66-B. (IF "YES") HOW RANY WOULD YOU SAY YOU WENT TO? . . . . . . . . ..1.-....-.-..-..-.-.---.--.--....-...-*-.--...-
ACTUAL NUMBER CODED
Q. 67. DID YOU READ ARY PARTY LEAFLETS OR REPORTS OF ELECTION SPEECHES DURING TEE CAHPAIGN? . . . . . ..-.....-............................-.-....--..
5922 1. YBS 2099 2. NO
172 8. DK 9. NA
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 127
VAR 0001 REP 0001 DATA SET ID-'72251 NABE-ICPR STUDY NONBER-7225 NO LlISSING DATA CODES
LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DR 6COL 1-4
STUDY NUMBER (7225) . . . . . . . . ..-.s....t.
VAR 0002 REF 0002 DATA SET ID-'7125 NAHE-INTERVIEW NUMBER 10 HISSING DATA CODES
LOC 5 WIDTH 5 DK 6 COL 5- 9
RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUtBEE
THE FIRST DIGIT IDENTIFIES TRE PROVINCB AS CODED IN VARIABLE FIVE; THE NEXT FOUR DIGITS ARE THE RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUflBER UITHIN THE PROVINCE. ALL FIVE DIGITS ARE NEEDED TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY A EESPONDEUT. . . . ..-.........-..*.1..--.--........-..-....-....-...........
VAE 0003 REF 0003 DATA SET ID-'72259 NABE-INTEGER WEIGHT VARIABLE NO BISSING DATA CODES
LOC 10 YIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 10
INTEGER WEIGHT VALUES
RESPONDENTS YEBE RXIGHTED ACCORDING TO TBEIB COISTITUEUCY OF RESIDEICE. ALL SUBJECTS LIVIPG IN COUSTITUENCI 1049 (ALGOnA WEST, ONTARIO) THROUGH CO80 (YtBTtORTE, ONTARIO) WERE UEIGHTED BY A FACTO!? OF ORt AND ONE-TEIRD. RESIDERTS O? #040 (CARTIER, QUEBEC) THRU to48 (SAINT-JACQUES, QUEBEC) (INCLUSIVE), 1081 (YORK CENTRE, ORTARIO) TERU to88 (ROSEDALE, ONTARIO), AND ALL RESPONDtNTS FRO1 BRITISH COLUtBIA Utllt DOUBLE WEIGHTED. TAE REST OF THE COWSTITUENCIES At1 UNYEIGRTED. SEE ALSO REP. NOS. 4 AND 6.
TRE PRCQUEWCIES IEPORTtD ?OP TRIS VARIABLE ttPtl!SEtT UNYEIGBTED (RAU) FREQUENCIES FOR TEE ACTUAL tUtBtB OF DATA CASES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-..-.....-.-...~.-....*.........-...--.-..
1113 3. URYEIGHTEP CASES 588 4. WEIGHTED ONE AND ONB-TEIRD (CONSTITUEtCItS t049-t0B0) 417 6. DOUBLE YtIGHTtD (COWSTITUtNCItS #040-t048, t0Bl-
#088, AMD #I 11-tllB)
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 128
VAR 0004 REP 0004 DATA SET ID-'7225' NANE-DECIKAL WEIGHT VARIABLE NO KISSING DATA CODES
LOC 11 YIDTH 3 DK 6 COL 11-13 2 DEC PLACE(S)
DECIMAL WEIGHT VALUES PLEASE SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 3 AND 6.
THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT ONWEIGHTED [RAW) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUHBER OF CASES.
VAR 0274 REP 0274 NAIIE-ANY PTY CANVASSED HOME? HD=GE 8
LOC 331 YIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 15
DK 6COL14
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 68. DID ANY OF TEE PARTIES CALL AT YOUR AOKE DURING TRE ELECTION CAMPAIGN? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..I............. lll-...l...---l . . . ..I
6070 1. NO 2123 2. YES
8. DK 9. NA
VAR 0275 REP 0275 NAME-XCANVASSED BY CNSVTV KD=O OR GE 7
LOC 332 YIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 16
DATA SET ID-'7225'
<DID CONSERVATIVE PARTY CALL AT R'S AONE. SEE REF. NO. 274.> - . . . . . . ..r....r... 1-..- . . . . . . . sm...---...
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 129
(CONTINUED) ..1.---...-
877 834
228
164 20
6070
1. YES 5. NO, BUT ANOTHER PARTY DID
7. SOME PARTY CALLED, BUT R DOES NOT RENEHBER WHICH PARTY
8. DK IF PARTY CALLED 9. NA WHICH PARTY 0. INAP (NO PARTY CALLED ON R; I.E.,
CODED 1 IN REF. NO, 274)
VAR 0276 REF 0276 NAHE-XCANVASSED BY LIBERALS ID=0 OR GE 7
LOC 333 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 17
DATA SET ID-'7225'
<DID LIBERAL PARTY CALL AT R'S HONE. SEE REP. NO. 274.) . . . . . . . . . . . . ..1.._-...-.........-...
991 1. YES 720 5. NO, BUT ANOTHER PARTY DID
228
164 20
6070
7. SOME PARTY CALLED, BUT R DOES NOT RENEUBGI? WHICH PARTY
8. DK I? PARTY CALLED 9. NA YHICH PARTY 0. INAP (NO PARTY CALLED ON R; I.E.,
CODED 1 IN BtF. AO. 274)
VAR 0277 REP 0277 NINE-XCANVASSED BY RDP MD=0 OR GE 7
LOC 334 YIDTN 1 DK 6 COL 18
DATA SET ID-'72251
595 1116
228
164 20
<DID NDP PARTY CALL AT R'S HOIIE. Stt RtF. NO, 274.> ..--1...--.-...-......----......
1. YES 5. NO, BUT ANOTAER PARTY DID
7. SOME PARTY CALLED, BUT R DOES NOT RENENBER YHICH PARTY
8. DK I? PAltTY CALLtD 9. 111, WHICH PARTY
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 130
(CONTINUED) . . I... * . . . .
6070 0. INAP (NO PARTY CALLED ON R; I.E., CODED 1 IN REF. NO. 274)
VAR 0278 REP 0278 NAflE-XCANVASSED BY SCLCREDIT HD=O OR GE 7
LOC 335 WIDTR 1 DK 6 COL 19
DATA SET ID-'7225'
<DID SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY CALL AT R'S 8013. SEE REF. NO. 274.> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..~..-~~~~..~.....~.....~..
94 1. YES 1617 5. NO, BUT ANOTHER PARTY DID
228
164 20
6070
7. SOME PARTY CALLED, BUT R DOES NOT REMEMBER NHICH PARTY
8. DK IF PARTY CALLED 9. NA UHICH PARTY 0. INAP (NO PARTY CALLED ON R: I.E.,
CODED 1 IN REF. NO. 274)
VAR 0279 REP 0279 NAME-XCANVASSED BY OTHER PTY MD=0 OR GE 7
LOC 336 UIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 20
DATA SET ID-'7225'
<DID OTHER PARTY CALL AT R'S HOME. SEE REF. NO. 274.> ..-..--.....I.........--.--....-..
16 1. YES 1695 5. NO, BUT ANOTBER PARTY DID
228
164 20
6070
7. SOME PARTY CALLED, BUT R DOES NOT REMEHBEE WHICH PARTY
8. DK IF PARTY CALLED 9. NA WHICH PARTY 0. INAP (NO PARTY CALLED ON R; I.E.,
CODED 1 IR REF. NO. 274)
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 131
VAR 0280 REP 0280 NABE-DID R HELP A PTY/CAND BD=GE B
LOC 337 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 21
DATA SET ID-'7225'
419 7741
33
Q. 69. DID YOU PERSONALLY EELP DIVE OF THE PARTIES OR A CANDIDATE? (FOR EXAHPLE, BY CANVASSING, ADDBESSING PABPHLETS.) . . . ..-........-.......-..-..............*.-...-..-.....
1. YES, HELPED 2. NO
8. DK 9, NA
VAR 0281 REP 0281 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAIE-TRY TO INFLUENCE OTR VT BD=GE 0
LOC 338 UIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 22
Q. 70. DID YOU, ON YOUR OYA, TALK TO AAY PEOPLE AID TRY TO SROY TBEB YAY THEY SEOULD VOTE FOR OBE OF TBE PARTIES OR CANDIDATES? . . . . . . . . . ..-._I-.--..........-.-...-...................-...
1037 1, TALKED TO OTEERS 6234 2. DID HOT
81 8. DK 41 9. NA
VAR 0282 REP 0282 NAME-IS R BBE POLTL ORCR BD=GE 8
LOC 339 YIDTH 1 DR 6 COL 23
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 71. DO YOU BELONG TO AWY POLITICAL CL5B OR ORGANILATION? . . . . . . . . ..-..................-...-.........~*....-.-*.*..--.
360 1. YES, BELONG 7822 2. NO
8. DK 11 9. AA
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 132
VAR 0283 REP 0283 NABE-B/H ABT (FDBL)FUND RAISE ED=GE 8
LOC 340 BIDTB 1 DK 6 COL 24
DATA SET ID-172251
Q- 72. THIS YEAR, DID YOU HEAX OR BEAD ANYTBIBG ABOUT A FEDERAL POLITICAL PARTY OR CANDIDATE HAVING A DRIVE, A DINNEB. OR SOHE OTBER AFFAIR TO RAISE MONEY FOR CAUPAIGN EXPENSES?
1676 5226 ::
HEARD OF HONEY RAISING DID BOT
1277 8. DK 14 9. NA
VAR 0284 REF 0204 NAEE-R CANVASSED FOR CNTRBN ED=GE 0
LOC 341 UIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 25
DATA SET ID-972258
Q. 73, DID YOU YOURSELF, ASK ANYBODY TO GIVE MONEY TO BELP PAY TEE COSTS DURING THE BOVEHBER ELECTION CAMPAIGN OF A CANDIDATE OR POLITlCAL PARTY? .11-.11...--........................-..-..-..-..--.........
Q. 74-A. DURING THIS LAST YEAR, BEBE YOU OR ANY BEHBEB OF YOUR ROUSEHOLD ASKED TO GIVE EONEY, BUY TICKETS, OR OTHERVISE COBTRIBUTE FIUANCIALLY TO HELP PAY THE CAEPAIGN EXPENSES OF A POLITICAL PARTY OR CANDIDATE? 1.-..-.-...............-..............*...-.....--....-...
422 YES 7413 :: no
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 133
(CONTINUED) I..........
358 8. DK 9. WA
VAR 0286 BEF 0286 NAEE-XWAS R ASKED FOB CNTRBN ID=0 OR GE 8
LOC 343 UIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 27
DATA SET ID-172251
Q. 74-B. (IF "YES") UEBE YOU, YOURSELF, ASKED <FOB POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION> OR YAS THIS SOEE OTHEB BEEBER OF YOUR HOUSEHOLD? . . . . . . ..-...._......--.---..-....................-.-.-..
248 1. RESPONDENT ONLY UAS ASKED 48 2. RESPONDENT AND FABILY EEHBER WERE ASKED
126 3. FAIILY EEKBEB OBLY UAS ASKED
8. DK UHO UAS ASKED 7771 0. INAP (CODED 2 OR 8 IN BEF. 10, 285)
VAR 0287 BEF 0287 DATA SET ID-172251 NAME-XCNSVTV ASKD R FR CNTBBN ID=0 OR GE 8
LOC 344 UIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 28
IF RESPONDENT UAS ASKED TO GIVE MONEY, ASK QUESTIONS 75, 76, 77 <BEFP. NOS. 207-293>. ALL OTHERS GO TO Q. 78 <REF. NO. 294>.
Q- 75. (IF ASKED TO GIVE MONEY) BY YHICB PARTIES EEBE YOU ASKED? <CONSERVATIVE PARTY ASK B> . . . . . . . . . . ..r...---.......-................-.--*-..--.--..
:: YES NO, BUT ABOTBER PARTY DID ASK B
16 8. DK PHICH PARTY 8 9. WA DEICE PARTY
7097 0. XNAP (R CODED 3, 8, OR 0 IN REF. NO. 286)
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 134
VAR 0288 REP 0288 NAKE-XLBRL ASKED R FOR CNTBBN MD=0 OR GE 8
LOC 345 HIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 29
V AR
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 75. (IF ASKED TO GIVE MONEY) BY BHICH PARTIES UEBE YOU ASKED? <LIBERAL PARTY ASK B> .-....-..---..-.-.--...-.*-..----....*.............-.~....
86 1. YES 186 5. NO, BUT ANOTHER PARTY DID ASK R
16 8. DK UHICH PARTY
7891: 9, NA UHICH PARTY 0. INAP (R CODED 3, 8, OR 0 IB REF. NO. 286)
0289 REP 0289 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XNDP ASKED B FOR CNTRBN MD=0 08 GE 8
LOC 346 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 30
Q. 75. (IF ASKED TO GIVE HONEY) BY WHICH PARTIES BEEE YOU ASKED? <NDP ASK R> . . . . . ..*...1.......1...-.-..--..----..-.-..-.-............
130 1. YES 142 5. NO, BUT ANOTHER PARTY DID ASK R
16 8. DK YRICH PARTY
78978 9. IA UHICH PARTY 0. INAP (R CODED 3, 8, OR 0 IN REF. NO. 286)
VAR 0290 REP 0290 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-XSOCRDT ASKD B PR CNTBBN ND=0 OR GE 8
LOC 347 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 31
Q. 75. (IF ASKED TO GIVE EONEY) BY WHICH PARTIES UEBE YOU ASKED? <SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY ASK B> ..--..-..............-....-..........-.......-.-.......---
27 YES 245 :: NO, BUT ANOTHER PARTY DID ASK B
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 135
(CONTXNUED) . . . . . . ..-.I
16 8. DK UHICH PARTY 0 9. NA UHICH PARTY
7897 0. INAP (R CODED 3, 8, OR 0 IN REF. NO. 286)
VAR 0291 REP 0291 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAME-XOTR PTY ASKD R FR CNTBB flD=O OR GE 8
LOC 348 UIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 32
Q. 75. (IF ASKED TO GIVE HONEY) BY WAICB PARTIES YERE YOU ASKED? <OTHER PARTY ASK R> . . . .._...............-..-.............-...-.-......-......
3 YES 269 :: NO, BUT ANOTHER PARTY DID ASK B
16 8. DK UBICH PARTY 0 9. NA WHICH PARTY
7897 0. INAP (R CODED 3, 8, OR 0 IN REF. NO. 286)
VAR 0292 REP 0292 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-XHOW R APRCHD FR CNTRBN ED=0 OR GE 8
LOC 349 UIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 33
Q. 76. IN UHAT WAY WERE YOU APPROACHED UHEN YOU UEBE ASKED FOB MONEY? BY LETTER? BY TELEPBONE? BY SOI'IEONE IN PERSON? AT A DINNER OR A MEETING? .-..................--..............-.,.-.*.-.............-.
83 1. LETTER 24 2. TELEPHONE
118 3. IN PERSON 30 4. AT A DINNER OR A EEETING 13 5, OTHER 16 7. COBBINATION OF ABOVE UAYS
4 8. DK
789; 9. 0. NA INAP (R CODED 3, 8, OR 0 IN REF. NO. 286)
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 136
VAR 0293 REP 0293 NABE-X R KNEY HONEY CARVASSER ID=0 OR GE 9
LOC 350 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 34
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 77-A. WERE YOU ASKED <FOR POLITICAL CONTEIBUTION> BY SOHEONE YOU KNEW PERSONALLY OR BY SOlEONE YOU DIDN'T KNOY? Q. 77-R. (IF KROYN) HOW DID YOU KNOW HII/HER? . . ..-.....'..1...-.........-..-.....-.--.-..........-.....
101 1. CARAVASSER NOT KNOWN
6X 2. RELATIVE 3. FRIEND
52 14 ::
FELLOY YORKER, BUSINESS COLLEAGUE NEIGHBOUR
40 6. OTHER
14 9. HA 7897 0. XNAP. (E CODED 3, 8 OR 0 IN BEP. NO. 286)
VAR 0294 REP 0294 DATA SET ID-'72258 NAHE-PTY R COYTRIBUTED TO RD=GE 9
LOC 351 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 35
Q. 78-A. DID YOU GIVK ROREY, BOY TICKETS, OR NAKE OTHER FINANCIAL CONTEIBUTXONS TO HELP A CANDIDATE OR PARTY PAY CABPAIGN EXPENSES TOR TAIS LAST ELECTION? Q. 78-B. (IF "YES") TO HIlICE PIETY DID YOU GIVK? <DATA PROB Q. 78-A AND 78-B YBRE COHBINED Ill RE?. 110. 294> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-.--..............-.....-................
7952 0.
49 1. 46 2. 94 3. 24 4.
3 5. 4 6.
15 a.
6 9.
NO, DID NOT RAKE COWTRIBUTIOK
YBS, TO COliSERVATIVES YES, TO LIBERALS YES, TO NDP Y1.5, X0 SOCIAL CREDIT YES, TO OTRCN PARTT YES, TO LIBERALS AND YDP
YES GAVE, MA YHICR PARTY
AA
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 137
VAR 0295 REP 0295 NAEE-OTR IN PAH1I.Y CONTRIBUTE BD=GE 18
LOC 352 WIDTA 2 DK 6 COL 36-37
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 79-A. AS FAE AS YOU KNOW, DID ANY OTREE BEEBER OF YOUR HOUSEHOLD CONTRIBUTE TO A CANDIDATE OR PARTY'S CAMPAIGN FUND? Q. 79-B. (IF "YES") TO WHICH PARTY DID TREY GIVE?
7653 00. NO, NO ONE ELSE COnTRIBUTED 31 11. YES, TO CONSERVATIVES 59 12. YES, TO LIBERALS 55 13. YES, TO NDP
6 14. YES, TO SOCIAL CRBDIT 6 15. YES, TO CREDXTISTE
16. YES, TO OTEER PARTY 6 17. YES, DK PARTY
12 18. DK <Q. 79-A) 19. YES, NA YHICA PARTY
359 98. DK IF GAVE 6 99. NA IF GAVE
VAR 0296 BEF 0296 NAME-ULD R HAVE CNTRBD IF ASK HD=O OR GE 8
LOC 354 WIDTA 1 DK 6 COL 36
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 80. (ONLY IF DID NOT HAKE C~BTRIBUTION IN Q 78-A <REP. NO. 294>). IF YOU HAD BEEN ASKED TO RAKE SORE CONTRIBUTION TO YOUR FAVOORITE PARTY OR A CANDIDATE YOU LIKED, UOULD YOU HAVE GIVEN HONEY? -.-.............-.......-..........-.....-..-.--.....-*.-..
15u5 1. YOULD HAVE BADE CONTRIBUTION 5131 2. YOULD NOT HAVE
1258 8. DA 24 9. NA
235 O- INAP (CODED l-8 IN REF. NO. 294)
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 138
VAR 0297 REP 0297 NABE-R ULD GV BNY/TIHE TO PTY BD=GE 8
LOC 355 UIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 39
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 81. WHICH POULD YOU RATHER DO TO HELP YOUR PARTY OR FAVOURITE CANDIDATE: GIVE BONEY OR GIVE TIBE? . . . . . . ..*.............-...*................-....--.....
799 1. GIVE fiONEY 3981 2. GIVE TIBE
478 3. PREFER BOTH EQUALLY 2401 4. DON'T CARE TO DO EITHER
516 8. DK 18 9. WA
VAR 0298 REP 0298 NABE-ATTD ABT BUSNEUN CNTRBN BD=GE 8
LOC 356 UIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 40
DATA SET ID-'7225'
486 1. GOOD THING PEOB BUSINESS CORPORATIONS 250 2. NOT A GOOD THING PRO8 BUSINESS COBPORATIONS 166 3. GOOD THING PROM TRADE UNIONS
40 4. NOT A GOOD THING FRO8 TRADE UNIONS 1537 5. GOOD THING FROM BOTH 4279 6. NOT A GOOD THING FROB EITHER
1415 8. DK 20 9. NA
VAR 0299
Q. 82. HOU DO YOU FEEL ABOUT CONTRIBUTIONS TO POLITICAL PARTIES FROB ORGANIZATIONS LIKE BUSINESS CORPORATIONS OR TRADE UNIONS? DO YOU THINK IT IS A GOOD THING OR NOT FOR OUR PARTIES TO RECEIVE SUCH CONTRIBUTIONS? *..-......*..-..-*-...................--.................
REP 0299 NABE-SHLD CNTRBN DCTBL INC-TX BD=GE 0
LOC 357 UIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 41
DATA SET ID-'.7225
Q. 83-A. WOULD YOU BE AGAINST OR IN FAVOUB OF ALLOWING PEOPLE TO DEDUCT PROM THEIR INCOBE TAX THE MONEY TBEY GIVE TO PARTIES AND CANDIDATES, IN THE SAME YAY THAT THEY DEDUCT BONEY THEY GIVE TO CAARITY? . ..-.......I-I...-I--.-.-.-........---.-.--.---...-....-..-.
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 139
(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . w...
2455 5316 ::
IN FAVOR OF IT AGAINST IT
422 8. DK
VAR 0300 REP 0300 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAME-SHLD PTY PUBLISH XPENSES BD=GE 8
LOC 358 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 42
0. 84-A. THE ABOUNT OF MONEY IT COSTS A POLITICAL PARTY TO RUN AN ELECTION CAMPAIGN DOES NOT HAVE TO BE BADE PUBLIC AT PRESENT. SHOULD IT BE REQUIRED THAT PARTIES PUBLISH THEIR EXPENSES OR NOT? ..s . . . . . . ..I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.1-s.1.-s......... 1...- . . . . . . .
5680 1. SHOULD PUBLISH 1671 2. SHOULD NOT
806 8. DK 36 9. WA
VAR 0301 REP 0301 NINE-PTY CNTRBR StiLD BE KNOWN ID-GE 8
LOC 359 WIDTH 1 DK 6 cOL 43
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q- 84-B. SHOULD PARTIES BE REQUIRRD TO DISCLOSE THE NAHES OF THEIR CONTRIBUTORS? _................._.............-.-..*....-........-..*...
3490 1. YES 3899 2- NO
786 8. DK 18 9. WA
VAB 0302 REP 0302 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-SHLD PTY REVEAL d CNTBBN BD=GE 8
LOC 360 YIDTH 1 DK 6 CoL 44
Q. 84-C. SBOULD PARTIES BE REQUIRED TO DISCLOSE THE AIOUNTS
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 1UO
(CONTINUED) -.1--s...-.
GIVER BY EACH CONTRIBUTOR? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3311 1. YES 4078 2. NO
752 8. DR 52 9. IA
VAR 0303 REP 0303 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAHE-SHLD GOVT PAY CLlPN XPNS RD=GE 8
LOC 361 UIDTH 1 DK 6 CDL 45
Q. 85. DO YOU THINK THE GOVERIHENT SHOULD PAY ALL, SOME OR NONE OF THE COSTS OF POLITICAL CAIPAIGNS? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-..........---.--....-....--.-.-.-....
2450 1. ALL 3045 2. SOHE 1975 3. NONE
695 8. DR 28 9. NA
VAR 0304 REP 0304 NAHE-R'S I'IARITAL STATUS ID=GE 9
LOC 362 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL Q6
DATA SET ID-'72251
Q. 86. ARE IOU HARRIED, WIDOWED, SEPARATED, DIVORCED, OR ARE YOU SINGLE? . . ..~.....".~...............~...................~...~~.~
RESPONDENT, WHO IS FIALE HEAD (INCLUDES SINGLE BAN) RESPONDENT'S AUSBAND RESPONDENT'S FATHER RESPONDENT'S FATRER-IN-LAW RESPONDENT, WE0 IS PEBALE HEAD (INCLUDES SINGLE WOH AN) RESPONDENT'S WIFE OTHER BALE OTHER FEUALE
9. NA
NAME-BAIN EARNER'S OCCUPATION BD=GE 99 LOC 364 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 48-49
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 88. WHAT IS THE RAIN EARNER'S (YOUR) OCCUPATION? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..--.....-.........--....-.......
702 912 355 903
2373 67
421 797 507
10. 20. 32. 37. 40. 60. 69. 70. 80.
PROFESSIONAL OWNERS, HANAGERS, BUSINESS EXECUTIVES SALES PEOPLE CLERICAL, OTRER WHITE COLLAR SKILLED LABOUR ARBED FORCES SERVICE, INDUSTRY AND PROTECTIVE UNSKILLED LABOUR FARBERS
YEARS OF SCHOOL DID YOU ATTEND? -............I....-....-...-.-..*.--......-.--..
ACTUAL NUEBER OF YEARS CODED
86 10 69
131 192 225 417 560
1134 874
1042 a25 1026
407 295 201 221 160
80 65 55
6 6 8 7 4 4 3
00. NO SCROOLING 01. ONE YEAR OF SCHOOL 02. TYO YEARS OF SCHOOL 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09.
::: 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20.
5:: 23. 24. 25. 26. 30.
VAR 0308 REP 0308 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAME-R'S SCL CLASS-OWN RANKG RD=GE 6
LOC 368 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 52
Q. 90. IF YOU HAD TO PICK ONE, WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING FIVE SOCIAL CLASSES WOULD YOU SAX YOU WERE IN -- UPPER CLASS, UPPER-RIDDLE CLASS, RIDDLE CLASS, WORKING CLASS, OR LOWER CLASS? . . . ..-...1_._.*.......--.-................................*
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 143
(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . . -.
74 1. UPPER CLASS 683 2. UPPER-RIDDLE CLASS
3115 3. BIDDLE CLASS 3665 4. WORKING CLASS
294 5. LOWER CLASS
137 6. THERE IS NO SUCH THING 198 8. DK
7 9. NA
VAR 0309 REP 0309 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-R'S CHURCH PREFERENCE NO RISSING DATA CODES
LOC 369 WIDTH 2 DK 6 cOL 53-54
Q. 91. WOULD YOU RIND TELLING OF WHAT RELIGION YOU ARE? . . . . ..__._..........-....--....-..--....................
260 00.
402 10. 259 11. 273 12.
1836 15. 1052 16.
384 19.
3433 20.
146 30.
106 70. 36 71.
6 79.
NONE
PRESBYTERIAN LUTHERAN BAPTIST UNITED CHURCH ANGLICAN OTHER PROTESTANT
ROEAN CATHOLIC
JEWISH
UKRAINIAN (GREEK) CATHOLIC GREEK ORTHODOX
ALL OTHER
VAR 0310 NAME-X R'S CHURCH ATTENDANCE
REP 0310 DATA SET ID-'7225' FlD=O OR GE 9
LOC 371 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 55
Q. 92. (IF RELIGION BENTIONED) ASK Q. 92 <REF. NO. 310). FOR OTHERS GO TO Q- 93 <REF. NO. 311>. ABOUT HOW OFTEN DO YOU GO TO CHURCH? AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK, TWO OR TBREE TIMES A RONTH, ONCE A BONTH, A FEU TIBES
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 144
(CONTINUED) ..a . . . . ..I.
A YEAR OR LESS, NEVER? . . ..I.................
3755 1. AT LEAST WEEKLY 824 2. 2 OR 3 TIMES HONTHLX 601 3. ONCE A flONTH
2180 4. A FEW TIRES A YEAR OR LESS 538 5. NEVER
35 9. NA 260 0. INAP. (CODED 00 IN REF. NO. 309)
VAR 0311 REP 0311 DATA SET ID-'7225' NANE-R'S ETHNIC ORIGIN NO MISSING DATA CODES
LOC 372 WIDTH 3 DK 6 COL 56-58
Q. 93. PLEASE TELL RE FROM YHAT COUNTRY BOST OF YOUR ANCESTORS CAHE? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-.-.....--.......---.-.*.....-...
599
3855 300. BRITISH ISLES 1916 312. FRANCE
321 315. GERMANY 108 317. NETHERLANDS 161 320. SCANDINAVIAN COUNTRIES
6 7. OTHER NON-EUROPEAN, CHINESE, JAPANESE, LEBANESE, ETC.
10 9. NA
VAR 0315 REF 0315 NAME-SIZE PLACE R GREW UP MD=9
LOC 380 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 64
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 96. WHEN YOU WERE GROAING UP UHERE DID YOU LIVE MOSTLY, IN A CITY OR SUBURB, IN A VILLAGE OR SHALL TOUN, OR ON A FARI? ~.................~................~.....~~~.~.............
2248 1. PARfl(S) 2648 2. VILLAGE(S) OR SMALL TOWN(S) 3263 3. CITIES OR SUBURBS
34 9. NA
VAR 0316 REP 0316 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-LIVED IN OTHER PROVINCES NO MISSING DATA CODES
LOC 381 YIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 65
Q. 91-A. HAVE YOU EVER LIVED IN ANY OTHER CANADIAN PROVINCE FOR MORE THAN SIX MONTHS? ..*_..._--.-.........*........*..........--.---.-.-.........
2436 YES 5757 1: NO
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 147
VAR 0317 REP 0317 NAME-XR LIVED IN NEWFOUNDLAND ID=0 OR GE 9
LOC 382 PIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 66
DATA SET ID-'7225'
Q. 97-B. (IF "YES") WHICA ONES? <R HAS LIVED IN NEYPOUNDLAND?> . . ..-1-..........................-.....*...--....
94 1. YES 23 11 5. NO
31 9. NA WHICH ONES 5757 0. INAP (R CODED 2 IN REP. NO. 316)
VAR 0318 REP 0318 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XR LIVED IN PRNC ED ILND BD=O OR GE 9
LOC 383 UIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 67
Q. 97-B. (IF "YES") WHICH ONES? <R HAS LIVED IN PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND?> . . . ..--..-..........---..-----...........---...*.----...
40 1. YES 2365 5, NO
31 9. NA UHICH ONES 5757 0. INAP (R CODED 2 IN REP. NO. 316)
VAR 0319 REP 0319 DATA SET ID-'7225' NARE-XR LIVED IN NOVA SCOTIA LID=0 OR GE 9
LOC 38U WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 68
Q. 97-B. (IP "YES") YAICH ONES? <R HAS LIVED IN NOVA SCOTIA?> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..11---.-..-..-..--.............--.--.
228 1. YES 2177 5. NO
31 9. NA WAICH ONES 575-l 0. INAP (R CODED 2 IN REP. NO. 316)
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 148
VAR 0320 REP 0320 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-XR LIVED IN N.BRUNSYICK HD=O OR GE 9
LOC 385 YIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 69
Q. 97-B. (IF "YES") YHICH ONES? <R HAS LIVED IN NEU BRUNSWICK?> . . . . . . . . . . . . ..I......................................
197 1. YES 2208 5. NO
57:: 9. NA UHICR ONES 0. INAP (R CODED 2 IN REP, NO- 316)
VAR 0321 REP 0321 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-XR LIVED IN QUEBEC BD=O OR GE 9
LOC 386 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 70
Q. 97-B. (IF "YES") UHICH ONES? <R HAS LIVED IN QUEBEC?> ..I..........................................,............
411 1. YES 1994 5. NO
57:: 9. NA YHICH ONES 0. INAP (R CODED 2 IN REP. NO. 316)
VAR 0322 REP 0322 NAIVE-XR LIVED IN ONTARIO ID=0 OR GE 9
VAR 0002 REP 0002 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAHE-INTERVIEW NUNBER NO BISSING DATA CODES
LOC 5 WIDTH 5 DK 7 COL 5- 9
RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUBBER
TAE FIRST DIGIT IDENTIFIES THE PROVINCE AS CODED IN VARIABLE FIVE; THE NEXT FOUR DIGITS ARE THE RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUBBER WITHIN THE PROVINCE. ALL FIVE DIGITS ARE NEEDED TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY A RESPONDENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
VAR 0003 REP 0003 DATA SET ID-'7225' NABE-INTEGER WEIGHT VARIABLE NO BISSING DATA CODES
LOC 10 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 10
INTEGER HEIGHT VALOES
RESPONDENTS WERE WEIGHTED ACCORDING TO THEIR CONSTITUENCY OF RESIDENCE. ALL SUBJECTS LIVING IN CONSTITUENCY 1OU9 (ALGOIIA WEST, ONTARIO) THROUGH to80 (WENTWORTH, ONTARIO) HERE WEIGHTED BY A FACTOR OF ONE AND ONE-THIRD. RESIDENTS OF
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 151
(CONTINUED) . . . . . . . . . . .
(040 (CARTIER, QUEBEC) TREU 1048 (SAINT-JACQUES, QUEBEC) (INCLUSIVE), CO81 (YORK CENTRE, ONTARIO) THRU t088 (ROSEDALE, ONTARIO), AND ALL RESPONDENTS FROB BRITISH COLUHBIA YERE DOUBLE WEIGHTED. THE REST OF THE CONSTITUENCIES ARE UNWEIGHTED. SEE ALSO REP. NOS. 4 AND 6.
THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT UNUEIGHTED (RAU) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUHBER OF DATA CASES. . . . . . . . . . ..-............................-----.-.....-.-..-..
1113 3, UNUEIGHTED CASES 588 4. WEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES #049-tO80) 417 6. DOUBLE WEIGHTED (CONSTITUENCIES t040-t048, #OBl-
1088, AND #ill-tl18)
VAR 0004 REP 0004 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-DECIMAL WEIGHT VARIABLE NO HISSING DATA CODES
DK 7 COL 11-13 2 DEC PLACE(S) LOC 11 WIDTH 3
DECIMAL UEIGHT PLEASE SEE ALSO
VALUES REP. NOS. 3 AND 6.
TAE FREQUENCIES UNWEIGHTED (RAW CASES.
REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT ) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF DATA
VAR 0327 REP 0327 DATA SET ID-'72251 NAME-R/H.H HBR LABOR UNION ID=0 OR GE 8
LOC 392 WIDTH 1 DU 7COL15
Q. 90. DO YOU (OR DOES THE HEAD OF THIS HOUSEHOLD) BELONG TO ANY OF THE FOLLOWING GROUPS: A LABOUR UNION: A TRADE ASSOCIATION; A FARN ORGANIZATION; A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION: ANY OTHER ASSOCIATIONS, CLUBS, OR ORGANIZATIONS? <BELONG TO LABOR UNION?> . . . . ..1--__1...-.*-....-..-..-...-.-..*...................
1911 1. YES, BELONG TO LABOR UNION 2519 5. NO
134 0. DK 39 9. NA
3590 0. INAP (R AND HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD BELONG TO NO ORGANIZATION)
VAR 0328 REP 0328 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAflE-R/H.B HBR TRADE ASCN HD=O OR GE 8
LOC 393 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 16
<R/HEAD BELONG TO TRADE ASSOCIATION? SEE REF. NO. 327) . . . . . . ..*..-..-.......-...-..--.-..--.---..............
330 1. YES, BELONG TO TRADE ASSOCIATION 4100 5. NO
134 8. DR 39 9. NA
3590 0. INAP (R AND HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD BELONG TO NO ORGANIZATION)
VAR 0329 REF 0329 NABE-R/H-H RBR PARH ORGN ID=0 OR GE B
LOC 394 WIDTA 1 DR 7 COL 17
DATA SET ID-'7225'
<R/READ BELONG TO FARH ORGANIZATION? SEE REP. NO. 327) ..--._..__...-...._...--.-..................-..........
313 1. YES, BELONG TO FARH ORGANIZATION 4117 5. NO
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 153
(CONTINUED) s . . . . . . . . . .
134 0. DK 39 9. NA
3590 0. INAP (R AND HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD BELONG TO NO ORGANIZATION)
VAR 0330 REF 0330 DATA SET ID-'7225' NARE-R/H-H HBR PRFNL ASCN HD=O OR GE 8
LOC 395 WIDTH 1 DK 7COLlB
<R/HEAD BELONG TO PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION? SEE REP, NO, 327> _...._.._.__._.__._..**-------.....---..-.--........-....
957 3473
134 39
3590
YES, BELONG TO PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION :: NO
0. DK 9. NA 0. IRAP (R AND HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD BELONG TO
10 ORGANIZATION)
VAR 0331 REF 0331 DATA SET ID-'7225' NALRE-R/H-H NBR OTR VLNTY ASCY ID=0 OR GE 8
LOC 396 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 19
<R/HEAD BELOIIG TO ANY OTHER VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATIONS? SEE REF. NO. 327> . .._..._._...-.-.1_.*---.--..-................-.........
1705 :: NO
YES, BELONG TO OTHER VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATIONS 2725
134 8. DK 9. NA. 0. INAP (R AND HEAD OF HOUSEROLD BELORG TO NO
ORGAEIZATIOE)
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 154
VAR 0332 REP 0332 NAME-XR VISITED OTHER'S HOME ND=0 OR GE 9
LOC 397 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 20
DATA SET ID-'7225'
FOR RESPONDENTS LIVING IN QUEBEC ONLY, ASK QUESTIONS 99, 100, 101 <REF. NOS. 332-334>. FOR ALL OTHERS GO TO QUESTION 102 <REF. NO. 335>
Q. 99. (QUEBEC ONLY) DURING THE LAST SEVEN DAYS, HAVE YOU VISITED OTHER PEOPLE AT THEIR HONES? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-.........*.......*...........
1. YES 2. NO
9.. NA 0. INAP. (R DOES NOT LIVE IN QUEBEC)
VAR 0333 REP 0333 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XOTHERS VISITED R'S HOME HD=O OR GE 9
LOC 398 UIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 21
Q. 100. (QUEBEC ONLY) DURING THE LAST SEVEN DAYS, HAVE OTHER PEOPLE VISITED YOU AT YOUR HOHE? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-.*......................*.--...*...
1680 1. YES 696 2. NO
15 9. NA 5802 0. INAP. (R DOES NOT LIVE IN QUEBEC)
VAR 0334 REP 0334 DATA SET ID-'7225' NARE-XR HAS BEEN OUT W OTHERS ED=0 OR GE 9
LOC 399 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 22
Q- 101. (QUEBEC ONLY) DURING THE LAST SEVEN DAYS, HAVE YOU BEEN OUT WITH OTHER PEOPLE SOMEUHERE ELSE THAN AT RELATIVES' OR FRIENDS' HORES? .__........-....................*.................*.........
1119 1. YES 1257 2. NO
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
(CONTINUED) . . . ...*....
PAGE 155
58:: 9. NA 0. INAP. (R DOES NOT LIVE IN QUEBEC)
VAR 0335 REP 0335 DATA SET ID-'7225' NARE-R'S AGE HD=O
LOC 400 WIDTH 2 DK 7 COL 23-24
Q. 102. (EVERYONE) WHAT IS YOUR AGE? .s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . s . . . . . . . me . . . . . . . _.I
Q. 103, INTO YHICH OF THE GROUPS ON THIS CARD DID THE TOTAL INCOME FOR YOUR FAHILT FALL LAST YEAR (BEPOBE TAXES) . . . . ..-......................-.-.*.-...-..-.-...............
01. UNDER $1,000 02. $1,000 TO $1,999
1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
677 03. $2,000 TO $2,999 973 04, $3,000 TO 33,999
1226 05. $4,000 TO $4,999 1322 06. $5,000 TO $5,999
849 07, $6,000 TO $6,999 613 08. 67,000 TO 97,999 598 09. $8,000 TO $9,999 532 10. $10,000 TO 514.999 332 11. $15,000 OR OVER
(CONTINUED) .w1......1.
PAGE 156
280 97. DK, REFUSED
VAR 0337 REP 0337 DATA SET ID-172251 NAME-R'S SEX NO HISSING DATA CODES
LOC 404 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 27
Q. 104. SEX . . . . . . -..I*.
4067 1. HALE 4126 2. PEIALE
QUESTIONNAIRE SECTION
-159-
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
1.
3a.
3b.
4a.
4b.
5.
You hear a lot about the problems facing the country today and we are interested in getting opinions on these from you. In your opinion, what problems facing the country would you say are most important? (open-ended question)
If any problems mentioned in 9.1 - ask Q.2. For all others go to Q.3.
2a. Which one of these problems is of special concern to you personally? (open-ended question)
2b. In what ways does this concern you? (open-ended question)
As you know, on November 8th we had a federal election. People are talking a lot about this election and the way it turned out. Do you happen to have any feelings about how the election turned out? (open-ended question)
Can you tell me something more about why you feel that way? (open- ended question)
Thinking now of the most important FEDERAL GOVERNMENT..........[] problems facing Canada today, which PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS......[] government would you say handles BOTH HANDLE THEM............[] most of these, the federal govern- NEITHER.....................[] ment in Ottawa or the provincial DON'T KNOW..................[] governments?
Are any provincial governments YES [] NO [] r-l
DON'T KNOW [1 I I more powerful than others? I I
GO TO QUESTION 5
If Yes
4c. Which one or ones?
As far as you are concerned per- sonally, which government is more important in affecting how you and your family get on? The one in Ottawa or the one in this prov- ince?
NEWFOUNDLAND................[ ] v 14 PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND........[ ] v 15 NOVA SCOTIA.................[ ] V 16 NEW BRUNSWICK...............[ ] v 17 QUEBEC......................[ ] v 18 ONTARIO.....................[ ] v 19 MANITOBA....................[ ] v 20 SASKATCHEWAN................[ ] v 21 ALBERTA.....................[ ] v 22 BRITISH COLUMBIA............[ ] V 23
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT..........[ ] PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT ..... ..[ ] BOTH IMPORTANT..............[ ] NEITHER.....................[ ] DON'T KNOW..................[ ]
V 8
v 9
v 10
v 11
v 12
v 13
V 24
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
6. During this election, people had different opinions about the issues which were important in the campaign. We are interested in hearing your opinion about what you thought were the most important issues in the last election. (open-ended question)
Now I am going to read you some of the issues which were discussed in the last election campaign and I would like you to tell me, for each issue how important it was to you personally in helping you decide how to vote.
7a.
7b.
7c.
7d.
7e.
7f.
7g.
Take social welfare issues, like health insurance and pensions. How important was that to you in deciding how to vote? Very important, fairly impor- tant, or not too important?
VERY IMPORTANT...........[ ] FAIRLY IMPORTANT.........[ ] NOT TOO IMPORTANT........] ] DON'T RNOW...............[ ]
, How about issues concerning the econo- VERY IMPORTANT...........[ ] my, such as unemployment, government FAIRLY IMPORTANT.........] ] planning for the future, foreign NOT TOO IMPORTANT........[ ] trade? DON'T RNOW...............[ ]
Now think of the issue of relations between French and English-speaking Canadians. Was this very important, fairly important, or not too impor- tant to you?
VERY IMPORTANT...........[ ] FAIRLY IMPORTANT.........[ ] NOT TOO IMPORTANT........[ ] DON'T KNOW...............] ]
In deciding how to vote, did you feel VERY IMPORTANT...........[ ] that the Canadian Flag issue was very FAIRLY IMPORTANT.........[ ] important, fairly important, or not NOT TOO IMPORTANT........] ] too important? DON'T KNOW...............] ]
What about the unity of Canada? Was VERY IMPORTANT...........[ ] this an issue which you found very FAIRLY IMPORTANT.........[ ] important, fairly important, or not NOT TOO IMPORTANT........[ ] too important? DON'T KNOW...............[ ]
Was corruption in government an is- VERY IMPORTANT...........[ ] sue which you found very important, FAIRLY IMPORTANT.........] ] fairly important, or not too impor- NOT TOO IMPORTANT........] ] tant? DON'T KNOW...............[ ]
How important did you find the issue of whether Canada should have a majority government?
VERY IMPORTANT...........] ] FAIRLY IMPORTANT.........1 ] NOT TOO IMPORTANT........] I DON'T RNOW...............[ ]
V 25
V 26
V 27
V 28
v 29
v 30
v 31
V 32
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
7h. Did the issue of strong leadership VERY IMPORTANT...........[ ] v 33 in Ottawa strike you as being very FAIRLY IMPORTANT.........[ ] important, fairly important, or not NOT TOO IMPORTANT........I 1 too important? DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii
8. Now I have a different kind of question. In recent elections, the political party which has formed the government in Ottawa has not had a majority of the seats in Parliament. Do you think it makes a great deal of difference, some difference, or not much difference whether the party forming the government has a majority of the seats or not?
9. If you believed that a party could form a majority govern- ment, but you did not ordinar- ily vote for that party, how likely would you be to vote for it in order to have a majority government? Very likely, some- what likely, or not at all likely?
MAJORITY GOVERNMENT MAKES A GREAT DEAL OF DIFFERENCE .... ..[
MAKES SOME DIFFERENCE .......... ..[ MAKES NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE ...... ..I DON'T KNOW ..................... ..[
; v 34
I I
VERY LIKELY TO VOTE FOR OTHER PARTY ................... [I v 35
SOMEWHAT LIKELY..................[ ] NOT AT ALL LIKELY................[ ] DON'T KNOW ....................... [I
10. How much interest do you generally A GOOD DEAL ............ ..[ 1 V 36 have in what is going on in poli- SOME ..................... [] tics - a good deal, some, or not NOT MUCH.................[ ] much? DON'T KNOW ............... [I
Now I'd like to talk about some of the different ideas people have about the government in Ottawa and see how you feel about them. These opinions don't refer to any political party in particular, but just to the govern- ment in general. For example:
lla. Do you think that quite a few of the QUITE A FEW..............[ ] v 37 people running the government are a NOT VERY MANY............[ ] little crooked - not very many are HARDLY ANY ............... crooked, or do you think hardly any DON'T KNOW ............... of them are crooked?
lib. Do you think that people in the goaern- A LOT....................[ ] V 38 ment waste a lot of the money we pay in SOME.....................[ ] taxes, waste some of it, or don't waste NOT MUCH.................[ ] very much of it? DON'T KNOW ............... []
-162-
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
llc. How much of the time do you think you can trust the government in Ottawa to do what is right - just about always, most of the time, or only some of the time?
ALWAYS...................[ ] MOST OF THE TIME.........[ ] SOME OF THE TIME.........[ ] DON'T KNOW...............[ ]
lld. Do you think that all people who are high in government give everyone a fair break, whether they are big shots or just ordinary people, or do you think some of them pay more attention to what the big interests want?
GIVE EVERYONE A FAIR BRFAK...............[]
PAY ATTENTION TO BIG SHOTS................[]
DON'T KNOW.................[]
v 39
v 40
lie. Do you feel that almost all of the people running the government are smart people who usually know what they are doing, or do you think that quite a few of them don't seem to know what they are doing?
ALL KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING................[]
QUITE A FEW DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING......[]
DON'T KNOW.................[]
v 41
Here are some other kinds of opinions that you hear different people giving. For these I'd just like you to tell me offhand whether you agree or disagree.
12a. Voting is the only way that people like me can have any say about how the government runs things. Do you agree or disagree?
12b. I don't think that the government AGREE .................. ..[ 1 cares much what people like me DISAGREE.................[ ] think. DON'T KNOW...............[ ]
12~. Sometimes politics and government seem so complicated that a person like me can't really understand what's going on.
12d. People like me don't have any say about what the government does.
12e. Generally, those elected to parliament soon lose touch with the people.
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
12f.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17a.
18.
Intellectuals take up too large a position in our governments.
We are also interested in how peo- ple are getting along financially these days. As far as you and your family are concerned, would you say that you are pretty well satisfied, more or less satisfied, or not at all satisfied about the way you are getting along?
During the last few years, has your GETTING BETTER...............[ ] v 49 financial situation been getting GETTING WORSE ................ [I better, getting worse, or has it STAYED THE SAME .............. [] stayed the same? DON'T KNOW ................... []
In general, would you say that the employment situation of you and your family now looks much better, somewhat better, somewhat worse, or much worse than it did two or three years ago?
Now looking ahead and thinking about the next few years, do you expect your financial situation will stay about the way it is now, get better, or get worse?
Do you think that the way the election turned out will make any difference in how well off you are?
If Yes
17b. Will it make things better or worse?
Have you personally been unem- YES..........................~ ] v 54 ployed and looking for work NO ........................... during the past year? DON'T KNOW ................... t;
PRETTY WELL SATISFIED........[ ] v 48 MORE OR LESS SATISFIED.......[ ] NOT AT ALL SATISFIED.........[ ] DON'T KNOW ................... [I
MUCH BETTER .................. [I v 50 SOMEWHAT BETTER..............[ ] ABOUT THE SAME ............... [I SOMEWHAT WORSE ............... [] MUCH WORSE...................[ ] NOT APPLICABLE ............... [] DON'T KNOW ................... []
STAY ABOUT THE SAME..........[ ] v 51 GET BETTER...................1 ] GET WORSE .................... [I DON'T KNOW ................... [I
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
19. Has anyone in your family been YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [] unemployed and looking for work NO . . . . . . . ..*................. during the past year? DON'T KNOW *....*............. :;
20. What about the last three years? YES . ..I...................... During that time, have you or NO......... . . . . . ..*.......... f3 any member of your family been DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . El unemployed and looking for work?
21a. Do you think there are any pro- YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vinces or regions of Canada which NO . . . ..*..................... I3 are better off than the others? DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I
If Yes
21b. Which ones?
(open-ended question) V 58 - V 70
NEWFOUNDLAND PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND
NOVA SCOTIA NEW BRUNSWICK
QUEBEC ONTARIO
MANITOBA SASKATCHEWAN
ALBERTA BRITISH COLUMBIA
MARITIMEs PRAIRIES
SPECIFIC REGIONS
22a. Do you think there are any provinces or regions of Canada which are worse off than the others?
YES....... NO........ DON'T KNOW
If Yes
22b. Which ones?
(open-ended question) V 72 - V 84
NEWFOUNDLAND PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND
NOVA SCOTIA NEW BRUNSWICK
QUEBEC ONTARIO
MANITOBA SASKATCHEWAN
ALBERTA (CON'T)
v 55
V 56
v 57
V 58 v 59 V 60 V 61 V 62 V 63 V 64 V 65 v 66 V 67 v 68 V 69 v 70
v 71
V 72 v 73 v 74 v 75 V 76 v 77 V 78 v 79 V 80
-165-
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
BRITISH COLUMBIA V 81 MARITIMES V 82
PRAIRIES V 83 SPECIFIC REGIONS V 84
If respondent's province is not mentioned in either Q.21b or Q.22b - ask 4.23. For all others - go to Q.24.
23. How do you feel about this BETTER OFF....................[] V 85 province? Do you think it WORSE OFF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . is better off than most, ABOUT AVERAGE................. t3 worse off, or about average? DON'T KNOW....................[]
24a. In which Canadian provinces do you think you might like to live?
24b. In which Canadian provinces would you definitely never want to live?
(a) (b) WOULD LIKE WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE IN TO LIVE IN
NEWFOUNDLAND.................[] V 86 [I V 96 PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND.........[] V 87 [I v 97 NOVA SCOTIA..................[] V 88 [I V 98 NEW BRUNSWICK . . ..*....a...... II V 89 [I v 99 QUEBEC.......................[] V 90 [] v 100
ONTARIO......................[] V 91 [] v 101 MANITOBA.....................[] V 92 [] v 102 SASKATCHEWAN.................[] V 93 [I v 103 ALBERTA......................[] V 94 [] v 104 BRITISH COLUMBIA.............[] V 95 [] v 105
DON'T KNOW [] DON'T KNOW [] NONE []
25. Thinking now of the national leaders of the four main political par- ties, which part of the country do you think these men are closest to: the Maritimes, Quebec, Ontario, the Prairies or British Columbia?
;i Take Mr. Diefenbaker. Does he have more connection with the Mari- times, Quebec, Ontario, the Prairies or British Columbia? What about Mr. Pearson? Mr. Douglas? Mr. Thompson? Mr. Caouette?
MORE CONNECTION WITH: DIEFENBAKER PEARSON DOUGLAS THOMPSON CAOUETTE
MARITIMES..............[] V 106 [] v 111 [] v 116 [I V 121 [I V 126 QUEBEC.................]] V 107 [] v 112 [] v 117 [] V 122 [I V 127 ONTARIO................[] V 108 [] v 113 [I V 118 [I V 123 [I V 128 PRAIRIES...............[] V 109 [] v 114 [] v 119 [] v 124 [I V 129 BRITISH COLUMBIA.......[] V 110 [] v 115 [] V 120 [] V 125 [I V 130
ALL THE SAME...........[] [I [I DON'T KNOW.............[] [I [I
-166-
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
26. Which political figure today do you think would make the best Prime Minister for Canada? (open-ended question)
27. One of the things we are interested in is the differences which exist between our federal political parties. Considering everything the parties stand for, would you say that there is a good deal of differ- ence between the parties, some difference, or not much difference?
GOOD DEAL OF DIFFERENCE.......[ SOME DIFFERENCE . ..*......,.... NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE........... F DON'T KNOW....................[
28a. Which of our federal political parties do you feel are most alike?
(open-ended question)
28b. Which of our federal political parties are least alike?
(open-ended question)
29. In your opinion, do you think it GREAT DEAL .................. ..I makes a great deal of difference, SOME DIFFERENCE ............. ..[ some difference, or no difference, NO DIFFERENCE ............... ..I which political party runs this DON'T KNOW .................... [ country?
3’ 1 J
(SHOW CARD) Now I have a different kind of question for you. I'm going to show you some word pairs. Each pair is separated by seven boxes like this. If you think that the particular political party is very well known, you would put a check mark in the box on the left end of the scale. If you feel it is not known at all, you would check the box on the right end of the scale. Or you might rate it somewhere between these two extremes.
(HAND RATING SHEETS)
30a. First, we'll start with an imaginary political party - the one you would consider the ideal for Canada.
The Ideal Party
Out of date [I [I [I [I [I [I [I Modern V 136 Competent [I [J [I [I [I 13 [I Incompetent V 137
Powerful [I 11 [I [I [I [I [I Weak V 138 Foolish [I [I II [I [I Cl [I Wise V 139
For the middle class [I r1 [I [I [I [I [I For the working class V United [I [I [I [I [I [I [I Split V 141
Bad [I [I [I [I [I [I [I Good V 142 Left wing [I 11 [I [I [I [I [I Right wing V 143
Strong-minded [I [l [I [I [I Cl [l Weak-minded V 144 Honest [I [I II [I [I [I II Dishonest V 145
Dull [I [I [I [I [I [I [I Exciting V 146 Young [I [I [I [I [I [I [I Old V 147
Slow [I [I 11 t1 11 [I [I Fast V 148
v 131
V 132
v 133
v 134
v 135
V 136-
v 213
V 136-
v 148
140
-167-
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
30b. Now you can go on to each of Canada's federal parties. v 149-
We've talked about the parties. I'd also like your opinions of the Members of Parliament which each of the parties have sent to Ottawa in the last few years. You may not know too much about them, but just give me your general impression of the job they have been doing.
3la. Let's start with the Liberal Mem- PRETTY GOOD...................[ ] V 214 bers of Parliament. How would you so-so ......................... [I rate the job they have been doing - NOT GOOD......................[ ] pretty good, just so-so, or not DON'T KNOW....................[ ] good at all?
31b. How about the Conservative Members PRETTY GOOD ................. ..[ I v 215 of Parliament? Have they been so-so ......................... [] pretty good, so-so, or not good NOT GOOD ...................... [I at all? DON'T KNOW .................... []
31~. What about the NDP Members of Par- PRETTY GOOD ................... [] V 216 liament? HOW would you rate them? so-so .........................
NOT GOOD ...................... t; DON'T RNOW....................[ ]
31d. And how about the Social Credit Members of Parliament following Mr. Thompson?
PRETTY GOOD ................... [] V 217 so-SO.........................[ 1 NOT GOOD......................1 ] DON'T RNOW....................[ ]
-170-
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
31e. And finally, what about the Caouette PRETTY GOOD..................[ ] group of Social Credit Members of so-so ........................ Parliament? NOT GOOD ..................... ;;
DON'T KNOW ................. *.[I
Ask questions 32 and 33 only in Quebec. For all others? Go to 4.34.
Now I'm going to ask you two questions about the Social Credit Party led by Mr. Caouette.
32. Do you personally feel that, in the last few years, oh the whole, the Social Credit Party in Ottawa has done a much better job, a somewhat better job, about the same, a some- what worse job, or a much worse job than the other par- ties?
33. What chances do you think the Social Credit Party has to become the party in power in Ottawa in the next ten years: a very good chance, fairly good chance, not too much of a chance or no chance at all?
Ask everyone
34. Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as Conservative, Liberal, Social Credit, Creditiste, NDP, Union Nationale or what?
MUCH BETTER..................[ ] SOMEWHAT BETTER..............[ ] ABOUT THE SAME ............. ..[ 1 SOMEWHAT WORSE...............[ ] MUCH WORSE...................1 ] DON'T KNOW ................... [I
VERY GOOD .................... [I FAIRLY GOOD ................. .[I NOT TOO MUCH CHANCE..........[ ] NO CHANCE .................... [J DON'T KNOW...................[ ]
CONSERVATIVE ................. [I LIBERAL ...................... [I SOCIAL CREDIT................[ ] CREDITISTE ................. ..[ I NDP .......................... [I UNION NATIONALE..............[ ] OTHER........................1 ]
v 218
v 221
NO PARTY ................... DON'T KNOW .................
If some party identification chosen, ask questions 35, 36, 37. If no party identification, ask question 38.
For identifiers
35. HOW strongly (STATE NAME OF VERY STRONGLY................]] v 222 CHOSEN PARTY) do you gener- FAIRLY STRONGLY..............[] ally feel - very strongly, NOT VERY STRONGLY............[] fairly strongly, or not very DON'T KNOW...................[] strongly?
-171-
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
For identifiers
36a. Was there ever a time when you thought of yourself as closest to any other party in Canada?
YES .......................... [I V 223
NO ......................... DON'T KNOW ................. r-l
36~. When did you change from that party to your present one? V 233 (open-ended question)
36d. What was the main thing that made you change?
(open-ended question)
V 234
For identifiers
37a. When you say you are a (STATE NATIONAL ONLY..... NAME OF CHOSEN PARTY) are you thinking of national politics. politics here in this-province, or both? PROVINCIAL ONLY...
37b.
BOTH .............. DON'T KNOW ........
If national only
j [] ASK 37b THEN GO TO Q.39
V I !
/ [] ASK 37c THEN GO 2
TO Q.39 j f
I
t3 GO TO 4.39
CONSERVATIVE ................. [] v 225 LIBERAL......................[ ] NDP .......................... SOCIAL CREDIT ................ t; CREDITISTE ................... [I UNION NATIONALE .............. [I OTHER ........................ [] NO PARTY.....................] ] DON'T KNOW ................... [I
-172-
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
If provincial only
Well, how about in na- tional politics? How do you think of your- self?
CONSERVATIVE.................[ ] LIBERAL ...................... [I NDP .......................... SOCIAL CREDIT ................ ;z CREDITISTE ................... [I OTHER ........................ [I NO PARTY ..................... [I DON'T KNOW ................... [I
GO TO QUESTION 39 1
For non-identifiers
38a. Well, do you generally think YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..a. r1 of yourself as a little closer to one of the parties NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . than the others? DON'T KNOW..................
If yes, feels closer
38b. Which party is that?
38~. When you say you feel closer to (NAME PARTY IN Q.38b), are you thinking of national politics , politics here in the province or both?
v 226
CONSERVATIVE ................. [I ; LIBERAL ...................... [I NDP .......................... SOCIAL CREDIT ................ t; OTHER ........................ []
If national only
38d. Well how about poli- tics here in (NAME PROVINCE)? To which party do you gener- ally feel closer?
CONSERVATIVE ............... ..[ 1 V 229 LIBERAL ..... . ............... *[I SOCIAL CREDIT ................ [I CREDITISTE...................[ ] NDP .......................... UNION NATIONALE .............. :; OTHER ...................... ..[ 1 DON'T KNOW ................. ..[ I
-173-
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
If provincial only
38e. How about national CONSERVATIVE.................[ ] V 230 politics? To which LIBERAL......................[ ] party do you genera- SOCIAL CREDIT................[ ] lly feel closer? CREDITISTE...................[ ]
NDP..........................[ 1 OTHER ...................... ..[ I DON'T KXOW...................[ ]
38f. Was there ever a YES .......................... II time when you felt closer to any other NO ......................... party? DON'T KNOW .................
If Yes 2 3
38g. Which party CONSERVATIVE.................[ ] 1 was that? LIBERAL ...................... [I
NDP .......................... SOCIAL CREDIT ................ :; OTHER ........................ [I
38h. When did you change from feeling closer to that V 233 party? (open-ended question)
381. What was the main thing that made you change? V 234
(open-ended question) GO TO
El 9.39
If doesn't feel close in Q.38a
38j. Was there ever a time YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..*...... [I V 232 when you did think of yourself as closer to NO......................... one of the parties? DON'T KNOW.................
If Yes
38k. When did you move away from that party?
(open-ended question)
V 233
381. What was the main thing that made you move away from V 234 the party?
(open-ended question)
-174-
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
Ask everybody
39. If at this time you had to vote for one of the other federal parties, which one would be your second choice?
Ask everybody
40.
41.
42.
43.
Which of the federal parties to- day would you least want to vote for?
On the whole, which of the follow- ing is most important to you when you vote? The candidate running in your riding, the party itself, or the party's leader? (DO NOT READ LIST)
Suppose there was an election in which the party you favour ran a candidate in your riding whom you did not like or did not agree with. What would you be most likely to do? Vote for the can- didate anyway? Consider another party's candidate? Or would you probably not vote at alL?
Suppose there was an election in which the party you prefer was in favour of some policy you did not like or did not agree with. What would you be most likely to do? Vote for the party's candidate anyway? Consider another party's candidate? Or would you probably not vote?
CONSERVATIVE ................. [I V 235 LIBERAL......................[ ] NDP .......................... SOCIAL CREDIT ................ ;3 CREDITISTE ................... [] OTHER........................[ ] NO SECOND CHOICE.............[ ] DON'T KNOW ................... II
CONSERVATIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..[I V 236 LIBERAL ...................... ij NDP .......................... [] SOCIAL CREDIT................[ ] CREDITISTE ................... OTHER ........................ f3 DON'T KNOW ................... []
PARTY........................[ ] V 237 LEADER ....................... [] CANDIDATE .................... PROGRAM ...................... :; PARTY AND LEADER EQUALLY.....[ ] PARTY AND PROGRAM EQUALLY....[ ] LEADER AND PROGRAM EQUALLY...[ ] CANDIDATE AM) PROGF%X.......[ ] CANDIDATE AND PARTY..........1 ] CANDIDATE AND LEADER.........[ ] DON'T KNOW ................... [I
CANDIDATE .................... v 238 OTHER PARTY .................. WON'T VOTE ................... DON'T KNOW ...................
CANDIDATE....................[ ] v 239 OTHER PARTY .................. [] WON'T VOTE ................... [I IT DEPENDS, QUALIFIED........[ ] DON'T KNOW...................[ ]
:
___ ..---- ------. ~
-175-
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
44. Do you remember, when you were growing up, whether your father was very much interested in poli- tics, somewhat interested, or didn't he pay much attention to it?
45a. Did your father have any particu- lar preference for one of the federal political parties when you were young?
VERY INTERESTED ..* . . . . . . . . . . . [] V 240 SOMEWHAT INTERESTED..........[] DID NOT PAY MUCH ATTENTION...[J
47b. Which party was that? CONSERVATIVE ................. [] LIBERAL......................[ ] CCF .......................... SOCIAL CREDIT ................
OTHER (SPECIFY) DON'T REMEMBER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I NOT CANADIAN PARTY . . * . . . . . . .j-m
-176-
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
48. Do you happen to remember the YES (ENTER NAME) V 244 name of the candidate who was elected to Parliament for this NO . . . . . . . . . . * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [] riding in the November 8th NOT SURE . . . . *...** . . . . . . . . . ..*...... [] election?
49. Do you happen (her) party?
to know his YES (ENTER PARTY) V 245
NO .................................. NOT SURE ............................
Consult card to see if respondent gave correct answers. If not, say:
Sometimes it's hard to remember these things but his name is
and his party is
50a. Have you ever read or heard YES . . . ..**..........**.............. [I anything about him (her)?
51a. Do you happen to know whether IN PARLIAMENT, CORRECT..............[] V 248 he (she) was already in Parlia- IN PARLIAMENT, ment just before this election?
If in Parliament, correct
51b. Do you remember anything YES v 249 that (NAME MEMBER) has DID NOTHING........................ done for the people of DON'T REMEMBER this constituency?
If Yes
51~. What was that? (open-ended question) [NEVER CODED]
51d. Has he (she) ever done YES . . . . . . . . . . ..*...*................ V 250 anything for you or your family personally? DONE NOTHING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-177-
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
If Yes
51e. What was that? (open-ended question) [NEVER CODED]
52a. Do you remember the names of any other candidates running for -- election on November 8th from this riding? (FOR EACH NAME MEN- TIONED ASK Q.52b AND A.52~).
V 251
52b. What is his (her) party? V 252
52~. Have you read or heard anything about him (her)? V 253
cc> (a) (b) HEARD NOT HEARD NAME PARTY ABOUT ABOUT
V 251 V 252 II V 253 [I
[I II
53. In federal elections since you have VOTED IN ALL.................[] V 254 been old enough to vote in Canada, VOTED IN MOST................]] would you say that you have voted VOTED IN SOME .,........*..... [I in all of them, most of them, some VOTED IN NONE of them, or none of them? DON'T
If respondent has ever voted in federal election - ask Q.54a. For all others - go to Q.55.
54a. Have you always voted for the same paw, or have you voted for different parties?
If same party
54b. Which party is that?
55. In provincial elections since you have been old enough to vote, would you say that you have voted in all of them, most of them, some of them, or none of them?
VOTED FOR SAME PARTY.........[] V 255 VOTED FOR DIFFERENT PARTY...
CONSERVATIVE ................. v 256 LIBERAL ...................... NDP .......................... SOCIAL CREDIT ................ r; OTHER ........................ [I
VOTED IN ALL.................[ ] V 257 VOTED IN MOST .............. ..t 1 VOTED IN SOME ................ ij VOTED IN NONE ............... . []IN QUEBEC: 1
GO TO Q.59a DON'T REMEMBER.............. [IALL OTHERS:
GO TO Q.57a
-178-
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
If respondent has ever voted in provincial election - ask 4.56
56a. In provincial elections, have you VOTED FOR SAME PARTY.........[ ] V 258 always voted for the same party, VOTED FOR DIFFERENT or have you voted for different PARTIES .................. [] GO TO parties? /--zJ
If same party
56b. Which party is that? CONSERVATIVE.................[ ] v 259 LIBERAL ...................... [I NDP .......................... [I SOCIAL CREDIT................] ] UNION NATIONALE .............. II OTHER........................] ]
Ask all except Quebec - Quebec go to Q.59a
57a. The last federal election before the one in November was in 1963. Do you remember for sure whether or not you voted in that election?
YES, VOTED [] NO, DID NOT VOTE
If Voted 2 6
57b. Which party did you vote for? CONSERVATIVE.................[] 1 LIBERAL......................[] NDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..*.......... [I MR. THOMPSON'S SOCIAL
CREDIT....................[] MR. CAOUETTE'S SOCIAL
58a. In talking to people about this past November election, we find that a lot of people weren't able to vote because they were sick, or didn't have time, or had some other reason for not voting. How about you? Did you vote this time or did something keep you from voting?
YES, VOTED [] NO, DID NOT VOTE [] / GOTOQ.641 V
If Voted 2 6
58b. For which party did you vote? CONSERVATIVE.................[] 2 LIBERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * . . . . . ..[I NDP .*........................ SOCIAL CREDIT................ I OTHER........................[] DON'T REMEMBER...............[] REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..[I
-179-
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
58~. When did you decide how you were going to vote?
(open-ended question)
58d. Was it an easy decision or not? V 264
EASY DECISION /,j NOT AN EASY DECISION []
V 263
If not easy decision
58e. Why not? (open-ended question) V 265
58f. Did you happen to bring along anything - like a postcard - when you V 266 went to vote, in order to help you remember who the candidates were?
YES .......................... NO ........................... t3 DON'T REMEMBER ............... [J
For respondents living in Quebec, ask 4.59, 60, 61. For all others go to 4.62.
Quebec only
59a. In the last three federal elections - in 1962, 1963, and November 8th of this/last year, Mr. Caouette's Social Credit Party obtained a large share of the Quebec vote. We would like to know if you voted Social Credit in any of these elections. Your answers are of course completely confidential.
Did you happen to vote for the Social Credit candidate in the 1962 federal election - the first one in which Mr. Caouette's party did so well?
YES .......................... [I NO ........................... DON'T REMEMBER ............... t3 REFUSED......................[ 1 V
2
59b. Which party did you vote for? CONSERVATIVE ................. [I : LIBERAL ..................... .[I NDP .......................... OTHER ........................ t3 DON'T RFKZMBER ............... [I REFUSED ...................... [I
-180-
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
Quebec only
60a. Did you happen to vote for the Social Credit candidate in the fed- eral election in 1963, the one in which Mr. Pearson's government was elected?
YES ......................... NO .......................... 13 DON'T REMEMBER .............. [J REFUSED ..................... [I v
2 6
60b. Which party did you vote for? CONSERVATIVE .............. ..[ 1 1 LIBERAL.....................[ ] NDP.........................[ ] OTHER ....................... [J DON'T REMEMBER .............. [] REFUSED.....................[ ]
Quebec only
61a. How about the election on November 8th. Did you vote this time or did something keep you from voting?
YES, VOTED [] NO, DID NOT VOTE pY5zciq
V If Yes Voted
61b. Did you vote Social Credit? YES.........................[] 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DON'T REMEMBER *............. :3
Q.blc) - Quebec). If same in both elections or did not vote in both elections - go to 4.63.
62. 1 notice that you change your vote from 1963 to 1965. Was there any special reason for changing the party you voted for?
(open-ended question)
Ask of those who voted in November election - if did not vote go to 4.64.
63. Now about your vote in the November election, was there any special reason for voting the way you did?
(open-ended question)
64. NOW let me end this discussion of how you voted with one more ques- tion, this time on provincial politics. For which party did you happen to vote in the last provincial election?
65. While most people think it is important to vote in all elec- tions it isn't always possible to do so. If it were necessary to make a choice, in which kind of election would you say it was most important to vote? Local elections, national elections, or provincial ones? (DO NOT READ LIST)
LIBERAL . . . . . . . . . [I mP/CCF.........[l SOCIAL CREDIT...[] UNION NATIONALE.[] OTHER...........[] DON'T REMEMBER..[] REFUSED . . . . . . . . . [I
NATIONAL ELECTIONS.........[ ] PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS.......[ ] LOCAL ELECTIONS............[ ] NATIONAL AND PROVINCIAL....[ ] NATIONAL AND LOCAL.........[ ] PROVINCIAL AND LOCAL.......[ I ALL EQUALLY .............. ..r I CAN'T CHOOSE...............~ ]
V 265
V 266
V 267
V 268
V 269
V 270
-182-
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
Now I'm going to ask you about some things which people do that help a party or candidate win an election. I wonder if you could tell me whether you did any of these things during the campaign for the Novem- ber election.
66a. Did you attend any political meetings or gatherings during the
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
7.2.
campaign?
YES, ATTENDED MEETINGS [] NO, DID NOT ATTEND
If Yes
66b. How many would you say you ATTENDED: STATE NUMBER went to?
DON'T REMEMBER .* . . . . . . . . *.*...[I
Did you read any party leaflets YES ...................... ..[ 1 or reports of election speeches NO.........................[ ] during the campaign? DON'T REMEMBER ............. [I
Did any of the parties call at your home during the election campaign?
Did you personally help one of the parties or a candidate? (For example, by canvassing, addressing pamphlets.)
Did you, on your own, talk to any people and try to show them why they should vote for one of the parties or candidates?
Do you belong to any political club YES, BELONG ................ [I or organization? NO ......................... [I
This year, did you hear or read anything about a federal political party or candidate having a drive, a dinner, or some other affair to raise money for campaign expenses?
NO PARTY CALLED............11 CALLED BY: CONSERVATIVES...[]
YES, HELPED................1 ] NO ......................... []
TALKED TO OTHERS...........[ ] DID NOT .................... [I DON'T REMEMBER ............. [I
HEARD OF MONEY RAISING.....[] DID NOT....................[] DON'T REMEMBER HEARING OF
MONEY RAISING...........[]
V 271
V 272
v 273
V 274 V 275 V 276 V 277 V 278 v 279
V 280
V 281
V 282
V 283
-183-
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
73. Did you, yourself, ask anybody to YES, ASKED FOR give money to help pay the costs CONTRIBUTION............[] V 284 during the November election NO, DID NOT................[] campaign of a candidate or poli- DON'T REMEMBER.............[] tical party?
74a. During this last year, were you or any member of your household V 285 asked to give money, buy tickets, or otherwise contribute finan- cially to help pay the campaign expenses of a political party or candidate?
YES [I NO iGE\
If Yes
74b. Were you, yourself, asked or RESPONDENT WAS NOT ASKED...]] V 286 was this some other member RESPONDENT WAS ASKED........]] of your household? FAMILY MEMBER WAS ASKED....[]
FAMILY MEMBER NOT ASKED....]] DON'T KNOW.................[]
If respondent was asked to give money, ask questions 75, 76, 77 - all others go to Q.78.
75. By which parties were you asked?
76. In what way were you approached when you were asked for money? By letter? By telephone? By some- one in person? At a dinner or a meeting7
77a. Were you asked by someone you knew personally or by someone you didn't know?
CONSERVATIVE...............[ ] V 287 LIBERAL....................[ ] V 288 NDP........................[ I V 289 SOCIAL CREDIT..............[ ] v 290 OTHER......................] ] v 291 DON'T REMEMBER.............] ]
LETTER.....................[ ] v 292 TELEPHONE..................] ] IN PERSON..................[ ] AT A DINNER OR A MEETING...[ ] OTHER ...................... [I DON'T REMEMBER.............[ ]
CANVASSER KNOWN............[ ] V 293
CANVASSER NOT KNOWN .......
-184-
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
If Known
77b. How did you know him/her? CANVASSER WAS: v 293
BUSINESS COLLEAGUE......[ ] NEIGHBOUR ................ [I OTHER .................... [I DON'T REMEMBER...........[ ]
78a. Did you give money, buy tickets, YES, MADE CONTRIBUTION......[ ] or make other financial contri- NO, DID NOT MAKE butions to help a candidate or CONTRIBUTION ............ party pay campaign expenses for this last election? I V
If Yes
78b. To which party did you give? CONSERVATIVES ............. ..[ 1 LIBERALS....................[ ] NDP ....................... ..[ 1 SOCIAL CREDIT ............... [I OTHER ........... ..*.........[ 3
79a. As far as you know, did any other member of your household contri- bute to a candidate or party's campaign fund?
YES 11 NO [---i-ii GO ;I;,""‘ ';;I
79b. To which party did they give? CONSERVATIVES ............... [I LIBERALS .................... [I NDP ......................... [I SOCIAL CREDIT ............... [I CREDITISTE .................. [I OTHER ....................... [I DON'T KNOW PARlY............[ ] DON'T KNOW .................. [I
Ask only if did not make contribution in Q.78a
80. If you had been asked to make some WOULD HAVE MADE v 296 contribution to your favourite CONTRIBUTION.............[ ] party or a candidate you liked, WOULD NOT HAVE .............. [I would you have given money? DON'T KNOW/NOT SURE.........[ ]
2 9 4
V
2 9 5
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
81.
82.
83a.
84a.
84b.
84~.
89.
IN FAVOUR OF IT []
If in favour 1 83b. Why are you in favour?
AGAINST IT []
I [NEVER coDED]
83~. Why are you against it?
[NEVER CODED]
The amount of money it costs a political party to run an elec- tion campaign does not have to be made public at present. Should it be required that par- ties publish their expenses or not?
SHOULD PUBLISH.............[ ] v 300
SHOULD NOT ................. [I
DON'T KNOW ............... ..[ 1
Should parties be required to dis- YES........................[ ] v 301 close the names of their contri- NO ........................ .[I butors? DON'T KNOW ................. [I
Should parties be required to dis- YES........................[ 1 V 302 close the amounts given by each NO ......................... [I contributor? DON'T KNOW ................ .[I
Do you think the government should pay all, some or none of the costs of political campaigns?
ALL ...................... ..[ I v 303 SOME ....................... [I NONE ....................... [I DON'T KNOW.................1 ]
Which would you rather do to help GIVE MONEY.................[] v 297 your party or favourite candidate: GIVE TIME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I give money or give time? PREFER BOTH EQUALLY........[]
DON'T CARE TO DO EITHER....[] DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I
How do you feel about contributions GOOD THING FROM BUSINESS V 298 to political parties from organi- CORPORATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . [I rations like business corporations NOT A GOOD THING FROM or trade unions? Do you think it BUSINESS CORPORATIONS...[] is a good thing or not for our GOOD THING FROM TRADE parties to receive such contri- UNIONS . . . . . . ...* . . . . . . . . [I butions? NOT A GOOD THING FROM
TRADE UNIONS . ..* . . . . . . . . [I GOOD THING FROM BOTH.......[] NOT A GOOD THING FROM
Would you be against or in favour of allowing people to deduct from v 299 their income tax the money they give to parties and candidates, in the same way that they deduct money they give to charity?
:
-186-
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
86. Now I just have a few more ques- MARRIED .................... [I v 304 tions. Are you married, widowed, WIDOWED .................... [] separated, divorced, or are you SEPARATED .................. [I single? DIVORCED...................[ ]
SINGLE.....................[ ]
87. Who usually is your family's main RESPONDENT, WHO IS MALE HEAD v 305 wage earner? (INCLUDES SINGLE MAN)........[]
RESPONDENT'S HUSBAND..........[] RESPONDENT'S FATHER...........[] RESPONDENT'S FATHER-IN-LAW....[] RESPONDENT, WHO IS FEMALE
HEAD (INCLUDES SINGLE WOMAN).[] RESPONDENT'S WIFE.............[] OTHER MALE....................[] OTHER FEMALE..................11
88a. What is the main earner's (your) occupation?
(open-ended question)
v 306
Probe
What kind of work does/do (he/she/you) actually do?
88b. In what type of business does/do (he/she/you) work?
Probe
[NEVER CODED]
What does/do (he/she/you) do there?
89. How many years of school did you attend? YEARS v 307
90. If you had to pick one, which of UPPER CLASS................[ 1 v 308 the following five social classes UPPER-MIDDLE CLASS.........[ ] would you say you were in - upper MIDDLE CLASS...............[ ] class, upper-middle class, middle WORKING CLASS..............[ ] class, working class, or lower LOWER CLASS................[ ] class? THERE IS NO SUCH THING.....[ ]
DON'T KNOW.................[ ]
91. Would you mind telling of what ROMAN CATHOLIC ............. :;
v 309 religion you are? UNITED CHURCH ..............
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
OTHER PROTESTANT (STATE):
ALL OTHER (STATE):
NONE [J
If respondent names religion, ask Q.92. For others go to Q.93.
92. About how often do you go to AT LEAST WEEKLY............[] v 310 church? At least once a week, 2 OR 3 TIMES MONTHLY.......[] two or three times a month, ONCE A MONTH . . . . . . . . *......[I once a month, a few times a A FEW TIMES A YEAR OR LESS.[] year or less, never? NEVER - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I
93. Please tell me from what country BRITISH ISLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I v 311 most of your ancestors came? FRANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...*.... []
If respondent was born outside of Canada, ask Q.94b.
94b. In what year did you become an BETWEEN 1946 AND 1960......[] v 313 immigrant to Canada? BETWEEN 1939 AND 1945......[]
BEFORE 1939 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I
95. What language do you most often ENGLISH ..I................. v 314 speak at home? FRENCH . ..*. * *.............. r'3
OTHER (WHICH ONE?)
-188-
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
96. When you were growing up where did FARM(S) ..................... [] v 315 you live mostly, in a city or sub- VILLAGE(S) OR SMALL urb, in a village or small town, TOWN(S) .................. or on a farm? CITIES OR SUBURBS .......... .1'3
97a. Have you ever lived in any other Canadian province for more than six months?
97b. Which ones? NEWFOUNDLAND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [] v 317 PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND........[] V 318 NOVA SCOTIA . . . . . . . . . * . . . . . . . [I v 319 NEW BRUNSWICK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [] V 320 QUEBEC......................[] V 321 ONTARIO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I V 322 MANITOBA....................[] V 323 SASKATCHEWAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [] V 324 ALBERTA .* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * . . . . [I V 325 BRITISH COLUMBIA............[] V 326
98. Do you (or does the head of this BELONG TO: LABOUR UNION.....[] household) (CHECK REPLY To 4.87) TRADE ASSOCIATION[] belong to any of the following FARM ORGANIZATION[] groups : a labour union; a trade PROFESSIONAL association; a farm organization; ASSOCIATION....[] a professional association; any OTHER VOLUNTARY other associations, clubs, or ASSOCIATION....[] organizations? BELONGS TO NO ORGANIZATION..[]
DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . ** . . . . . . . [I
V 327 V 328 v 329
v 330
v 331
For respondents living in Quebec only, ask questions 99, 100, 101. For all others go to question 102.
Quebec Only
99. During the last seven days, have YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...* [I you visited other people at their NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I homes?
V 332
Quebec Only
100. During the last seven days, have other people visited you at your home?
101. During the last seven days, have YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I you been out with other people NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [I somewhere else than at relatives' or friends' homes?
v 334
-189-
QUESTIONNAIRE, 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
102. What is your age? YEARS v 335
Hand respondent card
103. Into which of the groups on this card did the total income for your family fall last year (before taxes)?
A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. 3. K.
UNDER $l.OOO............[ ] $1,000 TO $1.999........[ 1 $2,000 TO $2.999........[ 1 $3,000 TO $3.999........[ 1 $4,000 TO $4.999........[ 1 $5,000 TO $5.999........[ 1 $6,000 TO $6.999........[ 1 $7,000 TO $7.999........[ 1 $8,000 TO $9.999........[ 1 $10,000 TO $14.999......[ 1 $15,000 OR OVER.........[ 1 DON'T KNOW, REFUSED.....[ 1
(ESTIMATE)
104. Sex. MALE ........................ [I FmLE......................[ 1