Cambridge Brewing Company Lindsey Childers Saipriya Sen Kohli Juliana Salgueiro Meredith Sciarrio
Mar 30, 2015
Cambridge Brewing Company
Lindsey ChildersSaipriya Sen KohliJuliana SalgueiroMeredith Sciarrio
Agenda
Restaurant BackgroundOverview of Current ScenarioObjectives and
Recommendations◦Reduce TAT during peak hours
◦Define and track KPIs and best practices related to food cost
Background on RestaurantOpened in 1989 and located in Cambridge,
MAOpen for lunch weekdays, dinner nightly,
and brunch on Saturdays and Sundays◦ Peak shifts: Thursday-Saturday evenings
Capacity: 120 seats in restaurant with 80 seasonal patio seats open only May-August
Brewmaster, General Manager, and Executive Chef manage day-to-day operations
In 2010: $2,869,634 in sales and $498,857 in net income
Overview of Current ScenarioTAT is currently high during peak hoursDifficulty handling high volumeLong waits during peak hoursCurrently don’t track food-related KPIs
◦ No measure of how they are performing or impacting profits
◦ Food cost increasing at a higher rate than revenue growth
Objectives
1) Reduce TAT at peak time by 8 minutes through changes in staffing and work flow process
2) Define and track KPIs and best practices related to food costs
Objective 1: Reduce TAT During Peak Hours
CBC peak hours:
Peak time: Thursday, Friday and Saturday Night
Peak hours: 6-9pm (3 hours)Peak time revenue (total)= $17,411Peak hours revenue
80% x Total peak time revenue (80% is approximate amount) = $ 13,929
Peak hours revenue as percentage of weekly revenue = 26%
Actual scenario: TAT from the time a customer orders to the time the food arrives is:
Total time: 1,200 sec. – 20 minutes
Total time: 1,790 sec. – 30 minutes
Objective 1: Reduce TAT During Peak Hours
120 seconds
Non peak times:
120 seconds 720 seconds 180 seconds60 seconds
290 seconds
Peak times:
290 seconds 720 seconds 370 seconds120 seconds
Bottleneck with staff
Bottleneck with staff
Bottleneck in kitchen
Recommendation: Increase the capacity of the grill• Burgers represent 28% of food sales• Current capacity: 12 burgers at the same time • Current cycle time: 1 minute• Increase by half the size of grill will allow CBC to
produce double the amount of burgers
Gain: reduce start of cooking process by 30 seconds
Objective 1: Reduce TAT During Peak Hours
290 seconds 290 seconds 720 seconds 370 seconds120 seconds
260 seconds
Recommendation: Rearrange the kitchen layout
Objective 1: Reduce TAT During Peak Hours
290 seconds
260 seconds
Gain: reduce the time to start cooking from counter time by 15 seconds
290 seconds 720 seconds 370 seconds120 seconds
245 seconds
Recommendation: Include one more employee in the kitchen staff• The grill is used for burgers and also for 6 more dishes• Only one person is responsible for the grill production
and burger assembly, creates bottleneck and increases prep time
• By having one employee to control the grill and another employee to assemble, they could reduce the production time
Cost: $210/weekGain: Reduce the assembly process time by 90 seconds
Objective 1: Reduce TAT During Peak Hours
290 seconds
260 seconds
120 seconds290 seconds 720 seconds 370 seconds
245 seconds
30 seconds
• We defined an optimal ratio (total customers/total shifts) and found that the optimal number of customers per server would be 49. Then, we suggested a new schedule:
Recommendation: Reallocate the front of house staff• When we analyzed the ratio of server per customers, we
identified an discrepancy between non-peak and peak hours
Objective 1: Reduce TAT During Peak Hours
Staff
M T W Th F Sa SuDay 3 3 4 4 5 4 4Night 4 5 5 6 5 5 3
Customers per Server
M T W Th F Sa SuDay 34 34 35 33 29 30 34Night 28 44 52 57 73 89 28
Staffing Proposal
M T W Th F Sa Su
Day 2 2 3 3 3 2 4
Night 2 5 5 7 7 9 5
Recommendation: Reallocate the front of house staffGain: reduce time to enter the order in the system to the non-peak
time reduce time of taking the dish in the kitchen and serving to
the customers to the non-peak time
FROM: 1,790 seconds to 1,295 seconds => Reduction of 495 seconds
Objective 1: Reduce TAT During Peak Hours
120 seconds290 seconds
Peak times:
290 seconds 720 seconds 370 seconds
260 seconds 30 seconds
245 seconds
120 seconds
Proposal process:
245 seconds 720 seconds 180 seconds30 seconds
120 seconds 180 seconds
Total gain projection
Objective 1: Reduce TAT During Peak Hours
Suggestion Detail Decrease in TAT
Investment
Add Grill Capacity
Increase grill capacity (so that it can take up to 35 patties)
30 seconds
$10,000 (one time investment)
Additional BOH Staff
Hire or increase staffing during peak hours by one person in BOH
90 seconds
$ 840 (monthly)
Change kitchen layout
Reassign coffee and prep counters
15 seconds
None
Staffing FOH Redistribute current staffing
360 seconds
None
FROM: 1,790 seconds to 1,295 seconds => Reduction of 495 seconds
or 8 minutes
Total gain projection: Per peak hour
Objective 1: Reduce TAT During Peak Hours
Total customer
Thursday
91
Friday 97
Saturday
119
Additional customer
12
13
16
Average check
$18.21
$20.45
$18.18
Increase in
revenue
$220
$365
$289
Total gain projection: 1 month
Increase in
revenue
$9,285
Margin22%
$2,042
Total cost projection: 1 month
New grill
$10,000
Increase in staff
$840
Additional Gains• Higher customer satisfaction = lifetime value• Shorter lines to be seated during peak hours• Increase in server efficiency and attentiveness• Higher employee satisfaction
What is Food Cost?
2008
2009
2010
28% 29% 30% 31% 32%
30.00%
31.30%
31.50%
CBC Current Food Cost
Industry standard metric that tracks inventory carry costs and profitability
Industry standards for successful operations range from 28% to 35%
Objective 2: Define Food Cost KPIs and Best Practices
Total food and non-alcoholic beverage salesTotal food and non-alcoholic beverage cost
=
%
Current Food Cost Control Practices at CBC
Quarterly Inventory – performed by chef, not reviewed by owner, and not used as a food cost tracker
Menu Changes – 4 to 6 times a year, mostly for seasonality
Receiving – all vendors are required to take product to storage area where quality and accuracy checks are performed
Chef performs all food prep with the exception of weekends – prep cook is employed to deal with peak times
Objective 2: Define Food Cost KPIs and Best Practices
Suggested KPIs for Tracking Food Cost
Food Cost KPI for tracking
Metric Description
Inventory Variance – allows for tracking waste
Comparing theoretical stock to on hand inventory
Menu items sold – currently estimated
Menu Mix – allows for knowing which menu items are most impactful on profits
Tracking actual plates sold expressed in percentage or figure
Spec Audits – chef works stations with team
Variance Allows chef to see how items are used
Objective 2: Define Food Cost KPIs and Best Practices
Suggested Best Practices
Best Practice Gain
Ensure order accuracy and quality at receiving door before vendor puts away
Reduction in overall touch costs
Spec Audits done on each kitchen/beverage station and food prep on a random basis
Reduction in overall waste, food cost, and touch costs
Inventory on a more regular basis
More accurate ordering practices, reductions in food carry costs
Objective 2: Define Food Cost KPIs and Best Practices
Possible Schedule for Implementation
Responsibility of Head Chef:
Objective 2: Define Food Cost KPIs and Best Practices
M T W Th F Sa Su
Reconcile Variance
Random Spec Audit (once a month)
Midday meeting with Management Team
Inventory
Questions?
Thank you!