5/27/14 1 Pamela Maragliano-Muniz, DMD Prosthodontist Associate Clinical Professor: Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA Private Practice: Boston, MA 2010 ADA Adult Preventive Care Practice of the Year CAMBRA in Private Practice Practices, Profits & Clinical Results Disclaimer •GC America •Tufts University School of Dental Medicine •Intraoral Photography Course Objectives •Recognize the relevance of a caries- management program in a modern dental practice •Understand the role of risk factors •Documentation •Risk-management strategies •Prevention is profitable! additional objective • How caries occurs • Why demineralization/ remineralization occurs • What to do http://drmaragliano.com /MDHA/ Prosthodontics & Prevention • Older patient population • Complex MH, Medications • Caries risk assessment • Diagnosis and treatment planning • Many restorative procedures increase caries risk • Favorable and predictable outcomes
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
5/27/14
1
Pamela Maragliano-Muniz, DMD Prosthodontist
Associate Clinical Professor: Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA
Private Practice: Boston, MA
2010 ADA Adult Preventive Care Practice of the Year
CAMBRA in Private Practice Practices, Profits & Clinical Results
Disclaimer
• GC America
• Tufts University School of Dental Medicine
• Intraoral Photography
Course Objectives • Recognize the relevance of a caries-
management program in a modern dental practice
• Understand the role of risk factors
• Documentation
• Risk-management strategies
• Prevention is profitable!
additional objective
• How caries occurs • Why demineralization/ remineralization occurs • What to do
http://drmaragliano.com/MDHA/
Prosthodontics & Prevention • Older patient population
• Complex MH, Medications
• Caries risk assessment
• Diagnosis and treatment planning
• Many restorative procedures increase caries risk
• Favorable and predictable outcomes
5/27/14
2
CARIES
• Caries is the most prevalent disease in the world • • Surgeon General: dental caries is the single most
common chronic disease of childhood
• Starting at age 60, tooth decay rates are equal to or greater than adolescent decay rates who grew up with no fluoride in the water
• 91% of adults are affected by caries in their lifetime • World Health Organization 2010
• Healthy People 2010, Surgeon General Report • Ettinger R. Oral health and the aging population. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138(9): 5S-6SJ
• Beltran-Aguilar, ED, Barker LK, Canto MT, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surveillance for dental caries, dental sealants, tooth retention, edentulism and enamel fluorosis: United States, 1988-94 and 1999-2002. MMWR Surveill Summ 2005;54(3): 1-43
•
Common Caries Misconceptions • Children and adolescents are at the highest risk for
developing caries and caries risk reduces with age.
• If you brush and floss your teeth, you will not be as susceptible to caries.
• High amounts of topical fluoride will minimize risk.
• If incipient caries are detected, the least invasive thing to do is to watch it.
Just the opposite!
Not necessarily!
It’s only part of the story...
NEVER!
Who has caries?
5/27/14
3
This is a solution to a problem, but does not address the disease
The Disease: Dental Caries
• Bacteria
• pH
• Demineralization
Bacteria
• S. mutans
• S. sobrinus
• Lactobacillus
• other bacteria
Dental Plaque
• S. mutans adheres to the tooth surface and converts sucrose to glucan
• Byproduct is lactic acid
• Bacteria is acidogenic, aciduric and cariogenic
pH
below 5.5 caries can develop
5/27/14
4
Enamel Enamel Rods Pores
Cross Section View
demineralization
• Constant cycle of acids formed by bacteria on teeth
• Acids remove minerals from teeth faster than the saliva can restore the minerals
• Without chemotherapeutics and risk management, caries will develop!
Demineralized Enamel Enamel rods become ragged Widening of inter-rod space Fluid Diffusion Occurs • Plaque acids • Calcium • Phosphate • Fluoride • Buffering agents
5/27/14
5
CARIES ���Impact on a Patient’s Quality of Life
✓ Diminished comfort, function, aesthetics and perception of oral health
✓ Increased anxiety
✓ Increased cost
✓ Direct link to systemic conditions
CARIES ���Impact on a Clinician’s Quality of Life
✓ Increased anxiety
✓ Delivering “bad news” ✓ Lack of control of disease process
✓ Reduced lifespan of restorations
So, we can’t see the disease, but we need to know how to find it
before it destroys teeth?!
CAMBRA�Caries Management by Risk Assessment �
• (CARIES MANAGEMENT BY RISK ASSESSMENT)
• Journal of the California Dental Association, Oct & Nov 2007
Evidence Based
Caries can be prevented and cured
Risk Assessment
Risk Management
ADA adopted
protocols CAMBRA
Why would I consider CAMBRA for my Practice?
Trends in Dentistry Legal Implications
5/27/14
6
Trends in Dentistry Shift towards Prevention
Studied insurance claims from 1992-2007 The number of restorative, endodontic, surgical procedures declined Composites are replacing amalgams
Conclusion: Practitioners might need to adjust the number of patients they treat and the services they provide
• D0604: extreme risk • D0999: unspecified diagnostic procedure, by
report
Caries risk assessment & documentation with a finding of:
www.carifree.com/dentists/blog/education/winning
Legal Implications
✓ Previous cases ✓ More patient awareness
✓ More community awareness
✓ Increased preventive responsibility of practitioners
“Although we have reached a relatively high degree of excellence in restoring teeth, placing high-
quality restorations in teeth that should not have been surgically cut and restored represents the
lowest overall standard of care.”
Ismail, S. Dental Caries in the Second Millennium. J Dent Ed. Oct 2011
Why would I consider CAMBRA for my Practice?
Clinical Benefits Financial Rewards
5/27/14
7
• 132 Patients
• Demographic Information
• # of new carious lesions
• # of reversal of incipient lesions
• Oral Hygiene Status
• Risk Category
Chart Review 2010
Maragliano-Muniz, PM., Roberts, DR., Chapman, RJ. Trends in Dental Hygiene: Clinical Results and Profitability of a Caries-Management Program in Private Practice. RDH Magazine, Dec. 2012.
results • n=132
62 Male, 70 Female
• Mean age: 63 years old
• 254 new carious lesions (49 People)
• 215 lesions reversed
• 102 accepted CAMBRA 93.87% Patients with new
carious lesions accepted CAMBRA protocols
Caries RIsk Classifications Distribution of Patients with ���
Improved patient satisfaction and comfort Increased time for communication and clinical evaluations Decrease in scaling time Decrease in scaling-related fatigue
Inside Dentistry, Jan 2012. p34-42. Maragliano-Muniz PM, Roberts DR, Chapman RJ.
Root surfaces are at risk for : abrasion, abfraction, continued recession and caries Difficult to monitor for changes Classification system for root surface remineralization & demineralization introduced Criteria: Surface hardness, texture, color, consistency, cavitation
Classification System for Root Surface Quality
CLASSIFICATION HARDNESS CHANGE TEXTURE CHANGE COLOR CHANGE CONSISTENCY
CHANGE CAVITATION NEED FOR
RESTORATION
NO CHANGE (NC) N/A N/A N/A N/A NO NO
D1 DECREASED ROUGH YELLOW TO
DARK YELLOW DULL NO NO
D2 DECREASED STICKY DARK YELLOW TO
LIGHT BROWN DULL NO NO, UNLESS
PATIENT REQUESTS
D3 DECREASED STICKY LIGHT BROWN
TO BLACK DULL YES YES
R1 INCREASED SMOOTH YELLOW TO
DARK YELLOW SHINY NO NO
R2 INCREASED SMOOTH DARK YELLOW TO
LIGHT BROWN SHINY NO NO, UNLESS
PATIENT REQUESTS
R3 INCREASED SMOOTH LIGHT BROWN
TO BLACK SHINY YES POSSIBLY AFTER
REMINERALIZATION
R4 INCREASED HARD PERIPHERY
SOFT CENTER DARK YELLOW
TO BLACK SHINY WITH A DULL CENTER YES YES
Summary of Classification System
Maragliano-Muniz PM, Roberts DR, Chapman RJ. Classification System for Root Surface Quality. Inside Dentistry, Jan 2012, p 40.
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR ROOT SURFACE QUALITY ���
NO CHANGE • No change:
• Hardness
• Texture
• Color
• Consistency
• No cavitation
• No need for restoration
5/27/14
9
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR ROOT SURFACE QUALITY ���
D1
• Hardness: Decreased
• Texture: Rough
• Color: Yellow to dark yellow
• Consistency: Dull
• No Cavitation
• No need for restoration
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR ROOT SURFACE QUALITY ���
D2
• Hardness: Decreased
• Texture: Sticky
• Color: Dark yellow to light brown
• Consistency: Dull
• No Cavitation
• No need for restoration, unless patient requests
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR ROOT SURFACE QUALITY ���
D3
Hardness: Decreased
Texture: Sticky
Color: Light brown to black
Consistency: Dull
Cavitation present
Possible restoration after remineralization
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR ROOT SURFACE QUALITY ���
R1
• Hardness: Increased
• Texture: Smooth
• Color: Yellow to dark yellow
• Consistency: Shiny
• No Cavitation
• No need for restoration
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR ROOT SURFACE QUALITY ���
R2
• Hardness: Increased
• Texture: Smooth
• Color: Dark yellow to light brown
• Consistency: Shiny
• No Cavitation
• No need for restoration, unless patient requests
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR ROOT SURFACE QUALITY ���
R3
• Hardness: Increased
• Texture: Smooth
• Color: Light brown to black
• Consistency: Shiny
• Cavitation
• Possible need for restoration, after remineralization therapy
5/27/14
10
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR ROOT SURFACE QUALITY ���
Instruct patients to expectorate- DO NOT SUCTION AFTER VARNISH APPLICATION
Do not brush/floss for 4 hours
Avoid hot, sticky foods
Avoid alcohol (beverages/ rinses)
Refrain from fluoride until the next day
Discontinue fluoride tablets for 2-3 days
MODERATE CARIES RISK
• Good oral hygiene
• Favorable diet
• Shallow to deep occlusal anatomy
• Few restorations
• Gingival recession
• No high risk factors
RISK REDUCTION ���MODERATE RISK
• Patient handouts
• Oral hygiene instructions
• Diet assessment
• Fluoride varnish
• Xylitol
• 6 month recalls
Considerations Anti-hypersensitivity White Spot Removal
Sealants
MI Paste
ACP-CPP (Recaldent) Casein: Milk-based Protein MI Paste Plus 900ppm NaF
Safe with Lactose Intolerance,
Pregnant Patients, Children
Contraindicated with Milk Allergy
Caution: Kidney Dialysis Kidney Stones
Milk Allergy
✓ Most common food allergy in early childhood
✓ 2-3% of infants and young children
✓ 85-90% of these children lose clinical reactivity to milk by age 3
✓ Prevalence in adults is 0.1-0.5%
1. www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/milk_allergy 2. Høst A (December 2002). "Frequency of cow's milk allergy in childhood". Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 89 (6 Suppl 1): 33–7. 3. Crittenden, R. G.; Bennett, L. E. (2005). "Cow's milk allergy: A complex disorder". Journal of the American College of Nutrition 24 (6 Suppl): 582S–591S. 4. The Dairy Council: www.milk.com.uk
5/27/14
24
MI PASTE APPLICATION WHITE SPOT REMOVAL ���www.drmaragliano.com
Before 2 Months Post-op
Before Immediately Post-op
Sealants for the moderate to high risk patient
Resin vs. Glass ionomer sealants
• Simonsen RJ. Retention and effectiveness of dental sealant after 15 years. JADA. 1991; 122(10): 34-‐42.
• Oong EM, GrifIin So, Kohn WG, Gooch BF CaulIield PW. The effect of dental sealants on bacterial levels in carious lesions: A review of the evidence. JADA. 2008;139(3):271-‐378.
• Bader J, Clarkson J, Fontana MR, et al. The effectiveness if sealants in managing caries lesions. J Dent Res. 2008;87(2):169-‐74.
• Beachamp J, CaulIield PW, Crall JJ, et al. American Dental Association Council of ScientiIic Affairs. Evidence-‐based clinical recommendations for the use of pit-‐and-‐Iissure dental sealants: a report of the American Dental Association Council of ScientiIic Affairs. JADA 2008;139(3):257-‐268.
• Karlzén-‐Reuterving G, van Dijken JW. A three-‐year follow up of glass ionomer cement and resin Iissure sealants. ASDC J Dent Child 1995;62(2):108-‐110.
• Smales RJ, Wong KC. 2 year clinical performance of a resin modiIied glass ionomer sealant. Am J Dent 1999;12(2)59-‐61.
• Poulsen S, Beiruti N, Sadat N. A comparison of retention and the effect on caries of Iissure sealing with a glass-‐ionomer and a resin-‐based sealant. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2001;29(4):298-‐301.
• Baseggio W, Naufel FS, Davidoff DC, Nahsan FP, Flury S, Rodrigues JA. Caries-‐preventive efIicacy and retention of a resin-‐modiIied glass ionomer cement and a resin-‐based Iissure sealant: a 3 year split-‐mouth randomized clinical trial. Oral Health Prev Dent 2010;8(3):261-‐268.
• Mejàre I, Mjör IA. Retention of a resin based sealant and a glass ionomer used as a Iissure sealant: a comparative dental study. J Indian Soc Pedodont Prev Dent 2008;26(3):114-‐120.
• Forss H, Saarni UM, Seppä L. Comparison of glass-‐ionomer and resin-‐based Iissure sealants: a 2 year clinical trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994;22(1):21-‐24.
• Al-‐Jobair A. In vitro evaluation of microleakage in contaminated Iissres sealed with GC Fugi Triage glass ionomer cement. J King Saud Univ 2010;22(1):25-‐32.
• Barja-‐Fidalgo F, Maroun S, de Oliveira BH. Effectiveness of a glassionomer cement used as a pit and Iissure sealant in recently erupted permanent Iirst molars. J Dent Child 2009;76(1):34-‐40.
• Frencken JE, Wolke J. Clinical and SEM assessment of ART high-‐viscosity glass-‐ionomer sealants after 8-‐13 years in 4 teeth. J Dent2010;38(1):59-‐64.
• Beiruti N, Frencken JE, van’t Hof MA, Taifour D, van Palenstein Helderman WH. Caries-‐preventive effect of a one-‐time application of composite resin and glass ionomer sealants after 5 years. Caries Res 2006;40(1):52-‐59.
• Beiruti N, Frencken JE, van’t Hof MA, Taifour D, van Palenstein Helderman WH. Caries-‐preventive effect of resin-‐based and glass ionomer sealants over time: a systematic review. Community Dent Oral Epidemio 2006;34(6):403-‐409.
Glass Ionomer Sealants ✓ Similar retention rates as resin-based sealants ✓ Less caries ✓ Better marginal integrity
Fuji triage sealants
• Glass ionomer
• Works in a moist field
• No isolation required
• No bonding agent required
• Self bonding (chemical bond) with its high fluoride release
• Safe to seal over immature enamel or non-cavitated lesions
• Glass ionomer sealant allows Fluoride, Calcium and Phosphate to pass though the sealant to help mature the newly erupted tooth
• Resin sealants create a barrier and Fluoride, Calcium and Phosphate cannot penetrate through the sealant
• Contains 1400ppm Fluoride- releasing over 400 days
• “rechargeable” with fluoride tx
• 1 capsule seals one arch
fuji triage sealants
5/27/14
25
Equia coat
• Nano-filled resin
• Seals over sealants
• Seals over glass ionomer restorations
• Seals provisional restorations
Cross Sectional View Glass Ionomer Reaching the Depth of the Fissure
HIGH CARIES RISK
• Incipient caries
• White spot lesions
• Xerostomia
• 60+ years old
• Orthodontics
• Recreational drug use
• Smoking
• Infectious contact
WHO ELSE IS AT HIGH RISK?
Active Caries
Extensive Restorative History RPD
Fixed Partial Dentures
“WATCH” AREAS
We no longer watch caries get larger, we can now predictably reverse or stop the process!
clinical caries���re-eval appointment
• Provide remineralization therapy (high risk protocols)
• Schedule re-eval with doctor who originally diagnosed in • one month
• Continue remineralization therapy or schedule appointment for restorative if needed
• Avoid “the poke”
5/27/14
26
Explorer
• Don’t depend on a “stick” or a “catch” to find caries
• 17-40% accurate • Lussi 1991, Panning 1992, Pereira 2001
• Transfer of bacteria
• Potential for damage of in tact surfaces
radiographic caries���re-eval appointment
• Provide remineralization therapy
• Bitewing x-rays 3-6 months
• Evaluate for reversal, stability or progression
• Evaluated by doctor who originally diagnosed
RISK REDUCTION ���HIGH RISK
• Patient handouts
• Oral hygiene instructions
• Diet assessment
• Fluoride varnish
• MI Paste Plus
• Xylitol (6-10g/day)
• 3-4 month recall MI Paste Plus
EXTREME HIGH CARIES RISK • Severe xerostomia
• Multiple medications
• Systemic conditions
• Multiple high risk factors/ acidic oral environment
• Planning/undergoing chemotherapy or radiation therapy
• Special needs patients
• Uncontrolled GI disorders
• Acid reflux, H. pylori, rumination
• High caries incidence
• Unknown cause
• Recreational drug use
RISK MANAGEMENT ���EXTREME RISK
• Patient handouts
• Oral hygiene instructions
• Diet assessment
• Fluoride varnish
• Xylitol (6-10g/day)
• 3 month recalls
MI Paste Plus +
pH Increasing Strategies
5/27/14
27
Baking Soda Toothbrushing Oral Environment with a low pH= DENTAL CARIES
• Acidic diet • High levels of cariogenic bacteria • Poor saliva quality • Poor saliva quantity
In addition to reducing bacteria levels, while increasing bioavailable calcium and phosphate in the teeth and saliva, reducing acids within the oral cavity
will promote and environment most favorable for caries incidence.
Baking Soda Toothbrushing �Raises pH �
Baking soda has an abrasion index of 7
The Relative Dentin Abrasion (RDA) Index adopted by the American Dental Association
0-70 Low Abrasive 70-100 Medium Abrasive 100-150 Highly Abrasive 150-250 Regarded as Harmful
CTx2 Spray
Glycerine Xylitol
Natural Flavoring
pH 9
WHAT DO I CHARGE?
• MI Paste/MI Paste Plus
• White spot removal
• Fluoride Varnish
• Sealants
Cost to Office Cost to Patient
$15.75 $25
$15.75 + chair time $300/ 3 sessions (15 minute sessions)
$2.43 $35 (average $35-50)
$195/50 capsules $51 per tooth
ADJUNCTS�
• Chlorhexidine
• Salivary Testing
• Glass Ionomers
Chlorhexidine
Non-specific Antimicrobial
Literature supports lack of efficacy
Interaction with Fluoride
Patient Compliance Issues
dfnnnnnnnnnndfd
5/27/14
28
The Oral Ecosystem 400-700 microorganisms in the oral cavity
Many are considered “good bacteria”. Many have not been named or classified and their role in
health or disease has yet to be determined.
Consider probiotics
Salivary Testing • pH Testing
• Saliva Check Buffer- GC America
• Bacterial Testing • Saliva Check Mutans- GC America
• CRT Bacteria- Ivoclar
• Cari-cult- Oral Biotech
• Dentocult SM- Orion Diagnostics
• ATPase Testing • Cariscreen- Carifree
Glass Ionomers
Amalgam
• Alloy of mercury and other metals
• In use for more than 150 years
• Higher longevity than composite
• More cost effective than composite
• Lifespan approx. 11 years
Antony, K. et al, 2008
Composite • Many shades, translucency
• Aesthetic
• Bonds best to enamel surfaces
• Anterior, posterior, class V
• Marginal breakdown, stain
• Secondary caries
• Lifespan approx. 5-7 years
...the clinical service longevity of neither amalgam or composite is
impressive. Neither type of restoration is reported to
serve for a long time...
To improve longevity, use a resin-modified glass ionomer liner on
either deep preparations or on all dentin surfaces...
Christensen, G., JADA 2011
5/27/14
29
ALTERNATIVES TO AMALGAM AND COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS�
GLASS IONOMERS�
GLASS IONOMERS�• 1. Do glass ionomers have adequate
retention and wear resistance?
• 2. Is the fluoride release clinically significant?
• 3. Does it really halt the caries process?
• 4. Isn’t it too weak to be a permanent restoration?
Glass Ionomers vs. Composite�“All 3 glass-ionomer restorative materials exhibited statistically significantly greater retention than did (the composite restoration). Glass ionomer materials are the restorative material of choice for abrasion/erosion lesions because of their long-term retention values”
Matis et al. Quintessence Int., 1996
“Average lifespan of composite was 6 years, glass ionomer was 11 years...” Sunnegardh-Gronberg, K., J Dent., 2009
“Glass ionomers most effectively and durably bond to tooth structure...” Peumans, M., Dent Mat.,
2005 “Glass ionomer restorations can mechanically in strength and wear but also in esthetics compete with posterior composites”
Van Duinen, RN, 2011, Millward, PJ, 2011
Fluoride Release
Resistance against caries has been show in both
in vitro and in vivo studies
Hicks, et al. Journal of the California Dental Assoc., 2000 Authors from: Baylor, Tufts, UTSA, UTH (also in Dental Clinics of North America)
Courtesy of Dr. Brian Novy
Courtesy of Dr. Brian Novy
“Electron probe microanalysis demonstrated that both fluorine and
strontium ions had penetrated deep into underlying demineralized dentin. The
pattern was consistent with remineralization. The only source of
these ions was the glass ionomer restoration.”
Ngo, 2006
Caries Inhibition �
Glass-ionomers, both conventional or resin-modified, are more effective at protecting the tooth against further decay than either compomers or fluoride-releasing composites, with the best protection of all being provided by conventional glass-ionomers.
Gjorgievskka, E., et al., 2009
GI was able to greatly increase fluoride release at an acidic,
cariogenic pH when these ions are most needed to inhibit caries...
Moreau JL, 2010
5/27/14
30
430 matched contralateral pairs of permanent molars Evaluated secondary caries
six years later
2% GI had caries 10% Amalgam had caries
Courtesy of Dr. Brian Novy
Mandari, Caries Res, 2009
GI as a Permanent Restoration?�
Easy bulk placement
Quick fillings (under 3.5 minutes)
Unique features Intelligent synergy effect with coating Aesthetic, yet economical
EQUIA What’s Unique about EQUIA?
• It has the benefits of glass ionomer
- Chemically bonds to dentin
- Kinder to tooth structure than composite
- Fluoride release and recharge
• Physical properties improve over time
Courtesy of Dr. Loccinski
Additional benefits of EQUIA
• Bulk-fil restorative material • No shrinkage • Placed in an wet environment
• CTE same as dentin • Economic
Mild on Tooth Structure
SEM picture of etched dentin Composite Bonding Technique
7000x
SEM Picture of conditioned dentin (Glass Ionomer
Bondingtechnique) 10000x
Dentinal tubules not exposed & minerals are not washed away = No Post Op Sensitivity�
5/27/14
31
GI as a Permanent Restoration?�
EQUIA may be used as a
permanent restoration...
Khandelwal, P. et al. IADR 2011
192 Restorations
24 Months NO Failures!
GI as a Permanent Restoration?�
Basso, M. et al. IADR 2011
378 Restorations
98% Overall Success Rate
Recommended for Class I, V and small Class II Restorations
EQUIA seems to be a
reliable choice for long
term restorations, even in
load bearing areas!
EQUIA is a System�
EQUIA Fil + EQUIA Coat �
EQUIA Fil�THE NEXT GENERATION OF GLASS IONOMER �
Higher reactivity for faster setting
Higher fluoride release
Higher translucency (improved aesthetics)
- unique filler particles uniformly dispersed
- penetrates no less then 30-50µm in the EQUIA Fil
- stronger final restoration
- film thickness as low as 35– 40 µm
- NO delamination layer between GIC and Coating
EQUIA Coat �Unique Technology�
What does EQUIA Coat do?�Fills porosities to increase the physical properties�
and offers a smoother surface�Equia Fil
Polished using silicon carbide paper Equia Fil
After Coating
100um 100um
EQUIA coat takes about 6 months (or more) to wear off!
5/27/14
32
But...if the coating is so great, why would we want it to wear off...�
�...and what happens after it wears off?�
“Intelligent Aging”�EQUIA undergoes a unique maturation process
initiated by the saliva
The restoration is harder Long term wear similar to that of composite
Fluoride release is never blocked
What does EQUIA Coat do?�
Application of EQUIA Coat… ...30-50 µm of penetration in to EQUIA Fil to fill up porosities …increases fracture toughness by 212% …increases flexural strength by 72% …increases flexural fatigue resistance …protects from acid erosion …improves aesthetics …takes long to wear off (6 months or more)
Source: U. Lohbauer, University of Erlangen, Germany. Staining with Rhodamine B. Visualization of the stained coating by fluorescent light
Once EQUIA Coat wears off...�
Fluoride recharge cycle is initiated
MORE RESEARCH�
2006
Text
MATURATION OF GI MORE EFFICIENT IN SALIVA
(IN VIVO) THAN IN WATER (IN VITRO)�
2001
GLASS IONOMERS�• 1. Do glass ionomers have adequate
retention and wear resistance?
• 2. Is the fluoride release clinically significant?
• 3. Does is really halt the caries process?
• 4. Isn’t it too weak to be a permanent restoration?
✓ Yes
✓ Yes ✓ Yes
✓ Not if you use EQUIA
5/27/14
33
Efficient �Time = $$ �
3 minutes, 25 seconds
No extra finishing and polishing steps EQUIA gives a substantial 50% time advantage over a standard 2 surface restoration done with Composite and approximately a 19% advantage over Amalgam *Source: The modified table has been made by Prof.Dr.K.H. Friedl based on the original published work at 'Materialien zur Beanspruchungsdauer und Beanspruchungshöhe ausgewählter Behandlungsanlässe', Deutscher Zahnärzte Verlag DÄV 2002
Chief Complaint: “I didn’t like my last dentist, so I haven’t gone in a while.
My wife is your patient, and to be honest, she sent me here.”
Case 1: ML Med Hx: 34 y/o, Non-contributory, No meds, NKA
Social Hx: Social Drinker, no smoking, married Diet: Self-proclaimed ‘candy-holic’, coffee throughout day Dental Hx: Reports usually needing dental work at each recall. Brushes teeth 1-2x/day, Flosses 0-1x/day
1. Oral hygiene instructions - high risk handout, brushing, flossing
2. Restorative treatment plan - consider glass ionomer cements for indirect
3. Nutritional counseling - sugar, sipping coffee
4. MI Paste Plus
5. Recall: 4 months initially, then 6 if caries is under control
Patient PM
Chief Complaint: “I don’t have any dental concerns except
sometimes my teeth are sensitive to cold.”
Intra Oral Exam
5/27/14
35
Case 2: PM Med Hx: 40 y/o, Non-contributory, No meds - Allergy: Latex, cats
Social Hx: Reports drinking rarely, does not smoke, divorced, casually dating, stay-at-home mom, 2 children Diet: Snacks frequently (“I eat what the kids don’t eat”) Dental Hx: Brushes teeth 2x/day, Flosses1x/day - last restoration was done as a child - gingival graft completed in 2003
Dental Findings Perio: - Generalized slight gingivitis on a reduced periodontium - Gingival recession
3. MI Paste Plus + MI Varnish for hypersensitivity
4. Recall: 6 months
Case 3: JB
Chief Complaint: “I know I have cavities and I know that I have to
get them fixed.”
5/27/14
36
Case 3: JB Med Hx: 29 y/o, anxiety - Meds: xanax - Allergy: None
Social Hx: Reports drinking 2-4x/week, smoke 1 pack/day, casually dating, currently unemployed Diet: Tries to eat healthy, drinks coffee and energy drinks Dental Hx: Brushes teeth 1x/day, does not floss - last dental visit: approximately 2-3 years ago - “fillings were recommended then”
2. Restorative treatment plan - consider glass ionomers
3. Nutritional counseling - sugar, coffee, energy drinks
4. MI Paste, Fluoride varnish
6. Recall: 4 months initially, then 6 if caries is under control
5. pH increasing strategies
Case 4: DA
Chief Complaint: “I’m here for a checkup.”
5/27/14
37
Case 4: DA Med Hx: 26 y/o, Non-contributory - Allergy: None
Social Hx: Reports infrequent social drinking, single mom, has 4 children Diet: Tries to maintain healthy habits, drinks coffee in the morning Dental Hx: Brushes teeth 2x/day, flosses daily
Diet Counseling Caution with sugar, sipping coffee over long periods of time
Fluoride varnish
What happens now?
This patient will be placed at high risk for the duration of her orthodontic therapy
Case 5: BP
Chief Complaint: “I have soft teeth and I grind them a lot.”
5/27/14
38
Case 5: BP Med Hx: 57 y/o, Non-contributory - Allergy: None
Social Hx: Reports infrequent social drinking, married, has 4 children, travels frequently for work, avid bike rider Diet: Tries to maintain healthy habits, drinks coffee in the morning Dental Hx: Brushes teeth 2x/day, flosses daily
3. Restorative treatment plan - consider glass ionomer luting agents
2. Physician referral
4. MI Paste, Fluoride varnish
6. Recall: 3-4 months
5. pH increasing strategies
POTENTIAL PROFITS ���5 days a week/ 48 weeks a year
Before Implementing CAMBRA
After Implementing CAMBRA
RDH: 8 Patients/day
$140 x 8= $1,120/ day
=$5,600/week
=$268,800*/year
RDH: 8 Patients/day 6 High Risk 1 Moderate Risk 1 Extremely High Risk
8 Pro+8 Fl2 + 7 MI Paste/ day $1120 + $280 + $175/day = $1575/day = $7875/week
= $378,000*/year * Does not include radiographs, sealants, white spot removal, tooth whitening
IMMEDIATE REWARDS
• Enhanced production within your Hygiene Department
• Improved communication • Patients • Office staff
• Practice at the highest standard of care
• Legal protection
LONG TERM REWARDS
• Improved patient retention & new patient referrals
• Increased production for elective dental procedures
• Improved experience • Patients • Office
Maintenance What do we do now?
What are the next steps?
Here’s what they say... If a patient is caries free for 3 years, the practitioner
may consider classifying the patient in a lower caries risk category.
J California Dental Assoc. Oct/Nov 2007
5/27/14
40
Here’s what I believe...
“If the disease is controlled with medicaments and risk management AND the risk factors are still
present, the patient will be treated at the existing risk category for life. I will consider reducing the caries risk classification only in cases where the disease is controlled AND the risk factors are
eliminated.”
- Pamela Maragliano-Muniz
SUMMARY
• Implementation of CAMBRA can be successfully implemented in the private practice
• Dental hygienists hold the key for successful implementation
• CAMBRA is beneficial to all patient populations/practice types