CAliFORNIA GEOlOGV slaff
DMG SEISMIC INTENSITY DISTRIBUTION MAPS 2181989 CALIFORNIA MINING REVIEW 219LIQUEFACTION AT SODA LAKE 225CALIFORNIA GEOLOGY WELCOMES NEW EDITOR 232BOOK REVIEWS 233TRANSPORTING MINING EQUIPMENT BY TRUCK 234MINERAL TRIVIA 236MAIL ORDER FORM 239CALIFORNIA GEOLOGY SUBSCRIPTION FORM 240CALL FOR PAPERS _ 240
Cover: Oblique aerial View of the Grelco Incorporated large diatorrute quarrynear lompoc. santa Barbara County. OIaIOOllte is a soh. light colored Siliceoussedtmentary rock used lor a variety of commercial products. Its name IS derivedfrom the diatom SkeIe10ns t1 IS composed 01 The diatomrte bearing zone In thismanne deposil exceeds 1.000 leet in thickness and ranges In age from 28 million years to 12 rYMIIion years o6d DIalomlle IS used as filters, insulabon matenalso fillers. line abrasive powders. adsorbents. catalysts, and in manulaetunngelploslVes
Diatoms are ooe-celled microscope water plants thai are found throughoutthe WOOd There are n'lOfe than 10.000 speaes 01 diatoms lI'lciuding both sat!water and fresh water vanebes. They play a Vital role in the food chain; WIthoutdiatoms most 01 the fISh ,n the wend would dl8. The ceM walls of diatoms arecomposed 01 SIlica Because Silica does not readily dissolve in waler. millionsof bny Silica skeletons from dead diatoms accumulate al the bottoms of seasand lakes. Over geologIC bme lhlCll. deposits 01 these skeletal remains amassed10 lorm commerCIally Importanl depoStts. Some crude Gil deposits were formedfrom lhe stored Oils of diatoms, Mosl 01 the large commercial depoSitS in Ca6for·rua occur pnmarily Within the central Coasl RaOQEls. An article about mineralm,mng In CalIfornIa starts on page 219. Photo courtesy of Craig Srmth. Grefco I........
Incorporated. I I
In This Issue I
DMG Seismic Intensity Distribution Maps
Don Cup..,Lena Tabibo
Lou.,. Huck4aby..leU Tambert
JAMES F DAVISStir. Gedog<st
GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN
"'--
Al"UIklCATlON Of TtlII!DENRTIIElIfT Of COfQERVATlON0M!IICltt Of _S AND GEOI..OGY
0I0f-.Hudqu&f~ t.'~NinlhS~. Room 13061.Sacr_, CA esal4(T~ 018-<145-18251
~ _ InIOrmaUOn Qffi(:.
&60 Ilefc:..l Ofrve SIcf_. CA i58' 4-0' 31Pubk InIofmation 018-.45-5718
lOl ........ OOo;e l07South~ RoomI06S,lOIlI.ngeId. CA lIOOI2-4402(Telelll'>one 213'820-35f101
PIN......~ Ol!o;e 3eOC,1fIC'; Or..... $w,. lOll.P1H....... HIlI. CA 0<1523·1921(Telephone .15-848·59201
n.~~ GOROONK VANVlECKSectel¥y lot' Resoc.wees
~oICoi_._, RANDALl M WARD","",w
..... CoOOonoo
Ted\nlcIIl EdllOfMsIstatlI EddorGraphoes and Des.gn.-......"-""'"
CAUFQANIA GEOI.OOY (ISSN 002tl4SSSI" publi&/le(Imonthly by t~ o.p••,mtnt or CoM_.tlon. Division 01MonH.1'Id GIOlog~ Th. Recordl Olll<:ell., ,n'·2OthSII"'. Sec:••",.nIO, CA 9$8'4 Second cl... post. 11p.id .1 S.c,.",."to. CA POltm••le, S."d .dd'e..chaOO-11O CALIFORNIA GEOLOGY (USPS 350 8401.80.2980. sacr........l<I, CA 95812-2980
Repottl conce",,"Il 0 .....10" Of M, end GIOlo9~
I'fO!I'CII .00 .fldeI end news ~ I.ted to 1tIe "f1hIdI<IcH It! car,Iof",....e iI'lC:lucMcl III l~ IflaQIl..... Con·lllbuledll'iC.... pholog'fIPhs.__,.nd;eolOgiC1l"-ing~lli."welcome
fHE CQHCLUSIONS AHOOPIN~S EXPRESS£O INARTICLES ARE SOlELY THOSE Of mE AUTHORSAND ARE NOT NECESSARILY ENOORSEO 8'1' THEOEPARTMENT Of CONSERVATION
eo"upoflClence S/IOuJd oe add'e..ed '0 Ed"o',CAliFORNIA GEOI..OGY 6llO 8Itclll Or..... SIcf_.CA~4-0131
SullaQ-lpI...... "0001*"'" SIngl<teopou S' 25-. SIncI l"bI<;ropllOn~ _ d>angI' 01 ..."...onlDrfl\llllClf'l till CAl.IFORHtA GEOI.OOY. PO 80lt 2980,Sacr_. CA ~2_2980
It has been a year since the magnitude 7.1 Loma Prieta earthquake. Dueto the overwhelming demand for geologic and seismic safely information after the quake. the Division of Mines andGeology (DMG) has for sale black-Hneprints of the seismic intensity distribu·tion maps taken from four DMG earthquake plannin9 scenarios: (1) SpecialPublication 60 (SP60). Earthquake planning scenario for a magnitude 8.3 earthquake on the San Andreas fault insouthern California; (2) Special Publication 61 (SP6l), Earthquake planningscenario lor a magnitude 8.3 earthquake on the San Andreas fault in theSan Francisco Bay area; (3) Special Publication 78 (SP78). Earthquake planningscenario for a magnitude 7.5 earthquake on the Hayward fault in the SanFrancisco Bay area: and (4) Special Publication 99 (SP99). Earthquake planningscenario for a ma}or earthquake on theNewport-Inglewood fault zone.
The seismic intensity distributionmaps show the expected distributionand intensity of seismic shaking andthe areas with a potential for liquefactlon. The maps from SP60 and SP99cover the 9reater Los Angeles area,the maps from SP61 and SP78 coverthe San Francisco Bay area. Pleasespecify the Special Publication number for each seismic intensity distribution map you order. The maps are$ 2.00 each (price includes sales taxand shipping). Payment must accompany your order. Make your check ormoney order payable to: Division ofMines and Geology. Address ordersto: Dale Stickney, Division of Minesand Geology. Geologic Informationand Publications. 660 Bercut Drive.Sacramento, CA 95814-0131.Please allow two to three weeks fordelivery. ~
CAlIFORNIA GEOLOGV ocroeEA 1990
1989 California Mining Review
JOHN L BURNETI. GeologIstMineral Resource Analysis Project
Division 01 Mines and Geology
Photo 1. Blasting gold ore at the open pit Mesquite mine. This large mine is located on the westernedge of the ChoCOlate Mountains near Glamis, Imperial County, Photos by author except as noted.
The October Issue of CALIFORNIA GE·OLOGY traditionally includes articles aboutmining actl.... ities In California, At the timethis issue went to press. mineral productiondata in California for 1989 were not yetcompiled. These statistics will be Includedin a luIure Issue. Every Californian is de·pendent upon mineral resources-they arethe building blocks 01 our society. Most ofthe mll'l9ral resources mined in Californiaare consumed here. A lew minerals minedhere, such as rare earths and borate minerals. are used throughout the world. Morethan hall 01 the oil consumed in Californiais produced here: in 1989, 337 million bar·rels 01 oil were produced in this state whilenearly 706 mdUon barrels were consumedhere. Although Impressive amounts of !helT10fe ·glamorous· miMfals. such as gold.oil, and silver, are produced in CaUforma.SIgnificant amounts 01 industrial mineralssuch as limestone. gypsum, diatomite. zeo~es. borates. and aggre;ate are also produced K'I thiS state. PortlOOS of this ar!IClewere ooglnalty wntten by the author andpublished in the May. 1990 issue 01 MJningEngmeeflf'lg...editor.
INTRODUCTION
For the first time in many years California slipped to second place in the
production of non-fuel minerals during1989. according 10 U.s. Bureau ofMines preliminary statistics. After beingthe leading slate for several years, California dropped behind Arizona due toan escalation in copper production inthat slale which was spurred by substantial increases in the price of copper.
The value of mineral commoditiesproduced in California increased 5 percent 10 $2.8 billion. California continued to lead all other states in the production of boron minerals. portland cement. gypsum. diatomite. sand andgravel. rare earth concentrates. andtungsten. California was second nationw;de in the production of gokt (behindNevada). cakium chloride. feldspar.magnesium comlXlUf'lds from brine. andsodium compounds.
GOLD AND SILVER
Gold production in California continued to increase and reached890.575 troy ounces in 1989. compared with 729.272 troy ounces in1988. Silver production moved upwardfrom 16.5 tons to 19.8 Ions. The twolargest producers of gold and silver. theMesquite mine in Imperial County andthe Mclaughlin mine in Napa County.led this increase (Photo 1). Mostsmaller gold and silver operationsshowed similar gains.
Open pit mining operations began atthe Royal/Mountain King mine nearCopperopolis. Calaveras County. Production at this mine is anticipated toreach 60.000 troy ounces of gokl peryear in the near future (Photos 2-5).TIle JamestO\All1 mine in TuolumneCounty increased production to morethan 100.000 troy ounces of gold in1989 (Photos 6-8).
CAliFORNIA GEOlOOY OCTOBeR 1990 ".
!-,-Io
Figure 1. Mine location map.
MINE LOCALITIES ~
1 Grey Eagle mIne2, $Iskon mmeJ, Hayden H'II mine4 McLal.l9hhn mine5 B'll Canyon, Vandalia mone6, Pacific Pearl mille7, RoyaVMounlam l<Jng minea. Jamestown mine9 LOI\{l Valley mine10.Crater m,ne11 United Ready MIJ quarry12. Fori Cady I11IIle13. Caslle Mountains mine14 Masqulle mine15,Padre/Madre mille16, locllao Rose ntln9
The company disclosed that the IndianRose ore deposit and the nearby Ocotillo gold zone are located between thePicacho mine and the Mesquite goldmine (Figure 1). A minable rese1V€ of5.1 million tons of ore averaging 0.023troy ounces of gold per ton has beenidentified in the Indian Rose deposit.Similar reserves are indicated in theOcotillo zone.
Hart District
Gold and silver exploration continuedin 1989 and many prospects approached the point of beginning production. One notable prospect nearingcommencement of mining operations isthe Castle Mountain gold deposit (Figure 1). The Castle Mountain deposit islocated in the historic Hart Mining District about 20 miles southeast of Mountain Pass. California. This deposit iscomposed of 2.000 claims covering 65square miles of eastern San BernardinoCounty. Exploration drilling on six orebodies within this deposit indicates thainearly 26 million tons of 0.055 troyounces of gold per ton of minable oreexists. and that 13.5 million tons 01 orewith 0.046 ounces of gold per tonexists (Linder. 1989).
Production continued al the Padre/Madre mine in the Cargo MuchachoMountains of Imperial County and mining began at the adjacent Canyon Goldproject (Rgure 1), The combined underground and open pit operations fromthese two concerns is expected to process 8 million Ions of gold ore over a 10year period with an annual productionof 60,000 troy ounces of gold. Thefirst gold from the nearby American GirlCanyon open pit mine was poured inSeptember 1989; the owner companyalso acquired the Oro Cruz propertyabout a mile from the American GirlCanyon pit.
New Gold Discovery
A new discovery was announced byGlamis Gold which operates the largePicacho gold mine in Imperial County.
,
•..-r. -.:;" -"<',
: ........... •
Photo 2. Distant view of mining operations at the Royal Mountain King gold mine.
220 CALIFORNIA GEOLOGY OCTOBER 1990
Photo 3. Front end loader IiIling a large dump truck with gold ore altha openpit Royal Mountain King mine near Copperopolis, Calaveras County.
The Hayden Hill deposit is a shallowepithermal ore body resulting from lateMiocene hot spring activity that occurredduring prolonged fault formation andcontemporaneous explosive volcanism.
The combined reserves of 2 millionounces of gokl in the ground will makethis deposit the third largest gold minein the state when full production isachieved. The deposit lies Vtlilhin agroup of rhyolite domes and plugs whichare cut by hydrothermal breccia lones.Preliminary results indicate that the mineralization occurred 15 million years agoin mid·Miocene lime (Under, 1989).
Hayden Hill District
..- -----
----
_ -;00 -- ..~.-
Formation of the ore deposit was preceded by the formation 01 a barren silicacap in middle Miocene volcanic rocks.Episodic fracturing of this cap providedspace for gold and silver to be depositedIn three different configurations; (1)quartz and potassium feldspar (adularia)veins, (2) stockworks or three-dimenslonal ore deposits formed by networksof veinlets, and (3) breccia zones composed of angular broken rock fragmentsheld together by silica cement.
Long Valley
The Long Valley gold prospect nearMammoth Lakes in Mono County isbeing explored by a drilling and sampling program by Royal Gold, Incorporated in a joint venture with StandardIndustrial Minerals, Incorporated (FtgureI). This prospect is located 2·1/2 milesnorth 01 the Mammoth Lakes Airportand 2 miles southeast of a kaolin pit thathas been operated by Standard IndustrialMinerals for many years. 1lle prospectIs an epithermal hot spring deposit withdisseminated free gold on the fracturesIn friable quartz veins and stringers.Proven ore reserves are placed at 1.8million tons containing an estimated50,000 troy ounces of recoverable gold.
The Hayden Hill District in LassenCounty has been drilled by Amax GoldIncorporated (Figure 1. Photo 9). Thisdistrict was first mined in the 18705 andIhe long·abandoned mine dumps werereworked by heap leach methods withinthe last len years. The present miningplan encompasses 6,000 acres and includes virtually the entire Hayden HillMining District. Current reserves are estimated to be 45.3 million tons of oreaveraging 0.032 ounces of gold per tonand 0.2 ounces 01 silver per ton. Annual production is expected to be145,000 ounces of gold and 445,000ounces of silver. Amax Gold Inc. is currently conducting environmental studieslor the necessary regulatory permittingprocess. Initial mine construction is tentatively expected to begin In 1991,
Photo 4. Close-up view of a drill rig at the Aoyal Mountain King mine.This rig is used to drill holes fOf placing explosive charges.
CAliFORNIA GEOLOGY OCTOBER 1990 '"
Photo 5. Milling plant al the Royal Mountain King mine where the gold ore is processed.
COPPER
The sustained high price of copperdUring the last few years has resulted inrefocusing the attention of mining companies on copper mines that may notcontain gold and silver values. Inactivemines in northwestern California andthe Foothills Copper Belt in the SierraNevada are being examined. Drilling,chemical sampling, and geochemicalwork are being performed on somecopper mineralized areas. Miningagreements and the necessary environmental negotiations are being considered on others. Some of these coppermines can be expected to resume operations. For example, the WesternWorld Mining Company plans to develop a copper-zinc property about amile south of Smartville. Yuba County.
Smartville
Photo 6. Open pit of the Jamestown mine, Tuolumne County.The mineralized ore vein in the center 01 the hill dips steeply to the right.
Siskon Mine
American Gold Mineral Corporationis developing the gold reserves at theSiskon mine in western SiskiyouCounty. Recent sampling and drillinghas extended the strike and depth ofore zones. Before 1958 this depositproduced over 100,000 ounces of gold,over 1 million ounces of silver, as wellas base metals such as copper and lead.The are averaged 0.17 ounces of goldand 0.4 ounces of silver per ton.
Grey Eagle Mine
The Grey Eagle mine in SiskiyouCounty, which last operated from 1980to 1983, is being explored by Centurion Gold Ltd. (Figure 1). Closure ofthe mine in 1983 was caused by operational problems centering aroundchemicals that leaked from the site.Significant ore reseJVes remain.
Big Canyon and Vandalia Mines
The Big Canyon and Vandalia minesin EI Dorado County were purchased byMother Lode Gold Mines Consolidated(Figure 1). These mines were exploredby Consolidated Goldfields in the early1980s and nearly $4 million was spent
to develop them. This area was the subject of a recent U.S. Geological Surveyresearch effort that indicates substantiallow-grade gold ore may exist.
The Western World Company copper-zinc deposit occurs in an area thathas been mined for copper since 1849.This deposit occurs near the north endof a northwest-trending belt of metamorphic rocks exposed along the western margin of the Sierra Nevada. Rockformations in the metamorphic belt arecomposed of thick accumulations of
222 CALIFORNIA GEOLOGY OCToeER 1990
Photo 7. Distant view of the wof1ling face. Jamestown gold mine.
ways and concrete prOOucts. 1ne largestaggregate pit in the nation is the UnitedReady Mixed Concrete plant at Irwindalenear los Angeles (Figure 1). This singleplant produces 4.5 million Ions of sandand gravel per year. Nine of the tenlargest aggregate pits in 1988 were inthe Los Angeles basin, AlamedaCounty. and Sacramenlo County of Cali·fornia (Michard. 1989). Not only doesCalifornia prcxluce more sand and gravelaggregate than any other state. it is alsothe largest consumer of aggregate.
SULFUR
The Crater mine in the Last ChanceRange of [nyo County is being exploredby the American Sulfur Prcxlucts Company 10 develop sulfur and gypsum deposits (Figure 1). The mine was first developed in 1917 and operated intermittently until 1943.
Photo 8 Jamestown mine milling operation. II is Ihe largest gold flolation mitlin the United Slates.
Paleozoic and/or Mesozoic marine sedimentary and voIcank: rocks that havebeen deformed, intruded by plutonicrocks. and metamorphosed. Rock texlures throughout the metamorphic belt.such as bedding planes and foliation.normally trend northwest and dipsteeply 10 the east. The Westem WorldMining Company's copper-zinc depositoccurs within a sequence of mafic volcanic rocks, sheeted mafic dikes. andlesser amounts of ultramafic rocks thatare probably Jurassic age (140 to 195million years old). Mafic rocks are commonly dark colored and contain signifi·cant amounts of iron and magnesium.Ultramafic rocks are composed chieflyof iron and magnesium minerals.
1ne copper-zinc deposit occurs asabundant sulfide minerals. A voIcank:extrusive lava complex overlies it. 1nedeposit consists of two closely relatedlenses that have been separated by afault. The southern-most lens consistsof aOOut 900,000 tons 01 ore and thenonhem lens consists of about600.000 tons of ore. Exploratory drilling indicates that the ore from bothlenses averages about 2.81 percentcopper and about 0.95 percent zinc[raylor. 1990).
CONSTRUCTION AGGREGATE
California led the nalion in the production of sand and gravel. Sand andgravel is used extenstvely by the construction industry for aggregate in high-
1ne ore bo:ty is a fault controUed 001spring deposit with tabular beds of sulfurinterlaced with gypsum, rhyolite (a silicarich volcanic rock). and limestone. Thefirst ob;ectiw of the developer is to pr0
duce agricultural sulfur and gypsum. A~on&ryru~moo~isw~~~
for epithermal disseminated gold.
CALIFORNIA GEOLOGY OCTOBER 1990
Photo 9. Oblique aerial view of the Hayden Hill Mining District, lassen County. Oldmine roads and abandoned shafts are common. Modern ore milling facilities are at themiddle foreground. Photo taken in July 1989. Courtesy of Amax Gold, Incorporated.
The most important market for bothsulfur and gypsum (hydrous calcium sulfatel is in neutralizing the alkalinity indesert soils_ When sulfur or gypsum isspread on soils, a sulfate molecule(504 ) is created in the soil by irrigationand oxidation. The sulfate dissolves thecalcium, sodium, and potassium deposits and increases the availabllity of phosphate and other nutrients to plants.The utilization of sulfur and its compounds enables thousands of squaremiles of othelWise barren lands on thewest side of the San Joaquin Valley tobe used for valuable crops such as lettuce, broccoli, and parsley.
SEA SHELLS
Oyster shell deposits on the floor ofthe San Francisco Bay continue to becollected by suction dredging methods.The largest deposits of native oysters (aspecies named OSfreo lurida Carpenter) occur offshore of Hayward and SanLeandro, Alameda County in the southSan Francisco Bay (Figure 1). Theyoungest shells collected are severalthousand years old and are buried inone to five feet of bay mud. The oysters originally grew over the entire floorof the bay but prevailing winds towardthe east transported the bottom sedi~
ments toward the eastern shore throughwave action,
The shells are gathered by a selfpropelled. wooden hulled barge withtwo trailing eight-inch suction pipes,The shells are washed and screened toremove mud and loaded onto a sepa"rate hopper barge.
The products. sold as Pacific PearlBrand Oyster Shell, include ground shellfor poultry and livestock feed, agricultural lime to neutralize acidic soils, andbam lime 10 neutralize livestock waste.This shell dredging operation is uniquebecause it is the only one on the PacificRim that supplies markets throughoutthis large region. Crushed shells areused as decorative stone and oystershell lablets are widely used as a foodsupplement by humans.
BORATE
An in situ solution mining operationis being planned by Fori Cady MineralsCorporation for a borate deposit southof the Cady Mountains, San BernardinoCounty (Figure 1). An estimated 147million tons of borate ore averaging 6.4percent boron oxide (B20 3l have beenlocated 1.350 feet below the desertfloor. A dilute hydrochloric acid solution will be injected from the surfaceand, after reaction with the borate ore.the dissolved ore will be returned to thesurface as a boric acid solution. Crystalline boric acid (H3BO) will then be produced by evaporation in ponds. Thedeposit averages 118 feet in thicknessand extends over 384 acres.
REFERENCES
Linder, H" 1989, Hart Mining District, SanBernardino County, California: CALI·FORNIA GEOLOGY, v. 42, no. 6,p. 134-140.
Michard, Don, 1989, Top ten sand andgravel plants: Rock Products, May,p. 44-46.
Taylor, Gary C., 1990, Mineral land c1assifi·cation of the Western World MiningCompany copper·zinc deposit nearSmartville, Yuba County. California:Division of Mines and Geology OpenFile Report90-1,12p. ~
'" CALIFORNIA GEOlOGY OCTOBER 1990
Liquefaction at Soda Lake:Effects of the Chittenden earthquake swarm of April 18, 1990
Santa Cruz County, California
By
C.J. WILLS and MW. MANSON, GeologistsDivision 01 Mines and Geology
INTRODUCTION
On the morning of Wednesday.April 18. 1990. the anniversary of
the great 1906 San Francisco earthquake. a series of aftershocks of the October 17. 1989 Lorna Prieta earthquakeoccurred near Chittenden ,md were feltthroughout the San Francisco Bay area.The largest of these earthquakes was amagnitude 5.4 event thai occurred at6:53 a.m. Pacific Daylight Time.
...Photo 1. View northeast over Soda Lake shoWing many sand bollstormed by Chinanden earthquakes of Apri118, 1990. Photos by theauthors except as noted.
.. Photo 2. Sand bolls from the Lorna Prieta earthquake 01 OCtober17,1989 and the Chlnar'lden earthquakes of Apnl 18, 1990 along aImear fissure near the edge of Soda Lake (view is 'rom center ofPhoto I toward top lell).
Landslides triggered by these earthquakes. which we informally call the MChiltenden~ earthquakes. were reponed by thenews media on Highway 152 (Hecker Pass Road) and Highway 129 in the southern Santa Cruz Mountains (Hgure 1),Because earth scientists anticipated that significant aftershocks of the Lorna Prieta eanhquake could cause surfacerupture on the San Andreas fault. panicularly if the after~
shocks were shallow. and because of the reported landslides.we made a brief field reconnaissance to assess the amount oflandslide damage and search for surface fault rupture. AtSoda Lake. nonh of Chittenden. the Chinenden eanilquakescaused liquefaction of deposits that had also liquefied duringthe Lorna Prieta eanhquake (Photos I and 2).
CALIFORNIA GEOLOGY OCT08ER 1990 225
".
20
CHITTENDEN
Eplcenler 01April 18. 1990
Earlhquake
fl,l. */:~~NVIUE 0 Soda
Lake
SAH JOSE
.:a.-<_•... Prlet.II.v,1I57m
system and is the boundary bet\l.leen theNorth American plate and the Pacificplate. Crustal mowmenl along the SanAndreas fault in the Santa Cruz Mountains has a long-term average of about0.52 inches (13 mm) per year (Minsterand Jordan, 1987; Perkins and others,1989).
C)-.•
~-N-
\ I0 '0
Miles
...ox..(A
GEOLOGY AND LANDSLIDES
The Chinenden earthquakes occurred along the San Andreas fault atthe southeast end of the Santa CruzMountains in the central Coast Rangesgeomorphic province (Flgures I and 2).The San Andreas fault is the majorcomponent of the San Andreas fault
..
CAl.IFORNIA
AF.gure 1. Map of the San Franasco BaylIfea showtng faults thai make up the SanAndreas lauh system and epcenters 01 thelorna PrIeta and Chittenden earthquakesModified from Wagner, 1990
'" CAliFORNIA GEOlOGY OCTOBER 1990
'-,-.:'
--'- ,-Figure 2. Active faults of the Watsonville-Chittenden area (adapted from Sryanl andotl'lers, 1981). Epicenter 01 M 5.4 earthquake, largest of the Chittenden earthquakes(from Undh and Lester, 1990). t.. landslide or rockfalilriggered by Chittendenearthquakes of April 18, 1990.
both, and locally have been cut off anddisplaced by fault movement (Allen,1946; Dibblee and Brabb, 1978; Wagner, 1990).
Landslides triggered by the Chittenden earthquake swarm were minor, Ashallow slump of poorly consolidatedsand buried one lane of Highway 129east of River Oaks in San BenitoCounty. This slump and several verysmall debris avalanches occurred in theTertiary Etchegoin(?) Formation (Agure3). The debris consisted of light-brownsandy soil. bedrock blocks or fragments.brush and trees. Similar shallow slumpsoccurred along the banks of the PajaroRiver in the same area. lhere werealso minor rockfalls onto Highway 129at Chittenden and in Chinenden Pass.and onto Highway 152 west of HeckerPass. All of these minor slides on theroads, with the exception of the largestone on Highway 129. were cleaned upby California Department of Transportation crews by noon on the day of theearthquakes.
Bedrock units in the S<x:Ia Lake areaare quite different on either side of thefault (FIgure 3). Northeast of the faultthe units are dominantly line-grainedmarine sedimentary rocks of Tertiaryage. Southwest of the fault, bedrockconsists of Mesozoic hornblende quartzdiorite overlain by Quaternary and Tertiary eolian sand, and both marine andnon-ma.t\ne. sand and gravel. Theseunits have been fractw"ed or folded or
(
a"f Cis
~ Ooa
" a':QIp
>lTei Tpt=- Tmp
Hqg
""...."~
LEGEND
alluvium
landslide debrisolder alluviumAromas sandPaso Robles Formation
Elchegoln Formation
Purisima Formationshale of Mt. Pajaro area
hornblende quartz.gabbro
geologic contact
active faultdike around margin
01 Soda lake
·•••,,;
Figure 3. Geologic map 01 the Soda Lake area ((rom Dibblee and Brabb, 1978)with traces 01 active raults (by Bryant and others. 1981).
CAlIFOFlNIA GEOlOGY OCT08ER 1990
•
..
exceeded a threshold value (Holzer andothers, 1989), The Imperial Countysite did not undergo liquefaction duringearlier earthquakes with measured peakaccelerations of less than 18 percent ofthe force of gravity {gravitational acceleration is 32 feet per second per sec·ond}, but did so when the triggeringearthquake had a peak acceleration of21 percent gravity. The unexpecteddelay in recorded onset of liquefaction(until after the strong motion ended)was attributed by the researchers to redistribution of pore pressures throughout the deposit.
Liquefaction occurred in many placesat the time of the Loma Prieta earth,quake. It was extensive along MontereyBay, Soda Lake. and the Pajaro Riverand caused severe damage to the MossLanding Marine Laboratory of the California State Universities and Colleges.Farther away from the epicentral area.the Marina District of San Francisco.Treasure Island, the eastern approachto the San Francisco-Oakland BayBridge, and the Port of Oakland wereheavily damaged, partly as a result ofliquefaction (Earthquake EngineeringResearch Institute. 1989; Plafker andGalloway, 1989).
Simultaneous measurements of seismically induced pore pressure changesand ground accelerations at a site in Imperial County thai was undergoingliquefaction during an earthquake indicated that total pore pressures approached the weight of overlying sediments after most of the strong motionceased, and excess pore pressures weregenerated once horizontal acceleration
..•
Photo 3. "Flowing" sand boil. At about noon on April 18, 1990 several sand boils were stillactive. When this photo was taken. water was still issuing 'rom the central crater o! thissand boil and t10wing evenly over all sides 01 the volcano-shaped mound (note ripples onthe sides of the sand boil).
quakes or volcanic eruptions) or artificial (vibrations from heavy equipment orblasting). Vibration of a saturated, porous sand or silt causes pore water tomigrate toward the direction of leastconfinement. If pore water cannot escape. pore pressures can approach thelithostatic pressure (the weight of theoverlying sediment). When liquefactionoccurs. the saturaled sediment nolonger acts as a solid but becomes a liquid with suspended mineral grains.Such material loses its internal resistance to defomlation by shearing (or~shear strength'") and can no longersupport a load. The excess pore pressure may be relieved by rapid ejectionof water and sediment in suspension tothe ground surface to form sand boils(also knov.m as sand blows or sand volcanoes). or by lateral spreading or hydraulic fracturing.
The stresses that produce liquefactionmay be natural (shaking from earth-
FAULT RUPTURE SEARCH
LIQUEFACTIONAND RELATED EVENTS
Uquefaction is defined by Youd(1973) as the transformation of a granular material from a solid state into aliquefied state as a consequence of increased pore pressure (pressure exertedby groundwater within the voids amongmineral grains in soil, alluvium, and bedrock). It is a relatively common earthquake-related phenomenon in Holocenesediments (Youel and Hoose. 1977). Itcan be induced by rapid application ofstresses that result in increased porepressure by pore water migration.
The San Andreas fault cuts throughthe southern Santa Cruz Mountains,where it has formed a series of rightlaterally offset drainages, side-hillbenches. and scarps. Following the Chit~
tenden earthquakes, we checked asmuch of the fault in the quake epicentralarea as possible for surface rupture.State Highways 129 and 152, MountMadonna Road. and Green Valley Roadall cross the San Andreas fault east ofWatsonville. All of these roads weredamaged in the Loma Prieta earthquakeby slumping of road fill and pavementcracking that was commonly perpendicular to the roadway. The cracks onMount Madonna Road in October 1989suggested right-lateral faulting, althoughthey may have been due to down-slopemovement of the road fill (Hart and others, 1990). The Chittenden earthquakescaused some longitudinal cracks in thepavement of Highway 152 to re-openslightly but no new cracks were obselV€dalong the trend of the fault at any of theroad crossings.
Following the reconnaissance of thepaved roads, a section of the San Andreas fault that crosses pasture land eastof Watsonville was examined. This segment of the fault is well defined by a series of tectonically produced geomorphicfeatures such as fault scarps. offset drainages, and sidehill benches, There weresome minor shaking cracks in a dirt roadwithin the fault zone, but no cracks thaiindicated right lateral faulting.
"8 CALIFORNIA GEOLOGY OCToeER 1990
Photo 4. Sand boil lormed by the Lorna Prieta earthquake(cenlral lissure in foreground) with two sand boils that wereerupted on April 18, 1990, possibly from the same tissure.
SODA LAKE
The Loma Prieta earthquake caused sand boils 10 eruptfrom the dry bed of Soda Lake. The volcano-shaped (conical)sand deposits were as large as 10 feet in diameter by 1 foothigh. Water continued to flow from several sand boils for fourdays after the main shock. The sand boils tended to be clustered along fissures. some of which paralleled the edge of thelakebed. Violent shaking from the Loma Prieta earthquakealso caused the entire lakebed to subside: fissures and scarpsalong the edge of the lake indicated that the lakebed sank asmuch as four feet during the earthquake (Manson and others.in progress). The loose sandy sediment consolidated, becoming both denser and more compact. This permanent consolidation of the sandy material reduced the amount of porespace and should have made the deposit less prone to futureliquefaction.
There are no reports of liquefaction in Soda Lake causedby the April 18, 1906 San Francisco earthquake. althoughsevere ground shaking in the surrounding area was docu-
mented (Lawson and others, 1908; Youd and Hoose, 1978).At Chittenden, several buildings were shifted off of their foundations and the Southern Pacific Railroad bridge over the Pajaro River was shifted three feet away from one of its abutments. A large landslide was triggered at the mouth of a canyon just west of the Jake, and there was severe liquefactionand fissuring in the Pajaro River and the Salinas River. SodaLake was probably full of water during the 1906 earthquake,which followed a winter of above normal rainfall (Lawson andothers, 1908. p. 399).
Extensive liquefaction occurred at Soda Lake as a result ofthe Chittenden earthquakes (maximum magnitude 5.4).Much of the 66'acre lakebed was covered by fissures andsand boils (Photos 1-4). The lakebed area affected by thisepisode of liquefaction was as extensive as that resulting fromthe Lorna Prieta earthquake (magnitude 7.1). There havebeen no reports of renewed liquefaction from other localitieswhere it occurred in October 1989. Apparently. the relatively small earthquakes of April 1990 were strong enough tocause liquefaction only in the immediate epicentral area andthe deposits in Soda Lake may be especially susceptible toliquefaction.
Soda Lake was originally a natural lake in an abandonedmeander bend of the Pajaro River (Jenkins, 1973). The surficial deposits and the material that formed the sand boils(Photo 5) appear to be tailings from the Granite Rock Company's Wilson quarry 0.6 mile west of the lake (for a description of this quarry see Higgins, 1989). The material beingquarried by Granite Rock Company is hornblende quartz-diorite (Dibblee and Brabb. 1978). Capacity of the natural lakewas increased by the construction of dikes along part of itsshoreline and the lake was used as a tailings pond for veryfine-grained quarry tailings from 1968 to the mid-1980s(Bruce Woolpert, Jr., Granite Rock Company. personal com·munication, 1990).
Grain-size analysis of the material erupted from the sandboils shows that the material that liquefied is a well-sortedsandy silt. with an average of 87 percent passing through a200-mesh screen. Screen mesh numbers indicate the num'bers of wires per inch for woven wire screens, particles passing through a 200-mesh screen are less than 0.074 mm indiameter (Table 1, Photo 6). An average of about 10 percentfine sand was also erupted from the sand boils, along with avery small percentage of clay.
If the effects of liquefaction can produce denser deposits,why has Soda Lake undergone repealed (at least two) episodes 01 liquefaction? There are numerous reported instancesof repeated liquefaction at many sites and in the laboratory(Borchardt and Kennedy, 1979, p. 217). It is not unusual fora sand sample to have a cyclic reaction to applied strain: thesample liquefies then solidifies in less than one second. Aslong as pore water drainage is blocked, the sample (or naturaldeposit) can liquefy again and again (Youd, 1973, p. 3).
The sediments at Soda Lake are probably susceptible toliquefaction for the following five reasons:
CALlFOONIA GEOLOGY OCTOBER 1990 '29
I
Photo 5. Cross section of a sand boil formed at Soda lake by the Lorna Prietaearthquake. Nole "feeder dike" 01 line sand below vent and line layering withinthe sand boil. Photo by W.A. Bryant.
flows caused by liquefaction have occurred in areas with intensities of M-MV to M-M Xl, with the greatest proportion (9 of 22 events, or 41 percent)lying within M-M VII zones (Keefer.1984). The lower peak accelerationand shorter duration of strong shakingassociated with a M 5.4 earthquake,compared to a M 7.1 earthquake, presumably is much less likely to causeliquefaction.
Keefer (1984) constructed a chartbased on data from several hundredearthquakes showing the distance ofliquefaction effects from the source faultrupture lones. From Keefer's chart, amagnitude 5.4 earthquake should causeliquefaction no farther than 3.7 milesfrom its hypocenter. Soda Lake isabout 3.7 miles from the hypocenter ofthe largest Chittenden earthquakes(hypocenter data from Lindh andLester. 1990).
Grain size (mm)
Figure 4. Grain size distribution of the average of three samples taken from Sodalake sal'ld boils ploned on chart sllowing "most liquefiable" al'ld "potentiallyliquefiable" soil. By Tsuchida, 7970, as reprinted in Hausner and others, 7985.
101.0
(5) Shaking from the Loma Prieta earthquake may have caused uneven consolidation of the sediments, compactingportions of the deposit but not affectingothers. A model for repeated liquefaction of a deposit due to partial compaction has been proposed (Finn and others, 1970) and is summarized as: ~Aseries of small previous shakings eithertoo weak to cause liquefaction or justbarely strong enough to cause [initialliquefaction!. allows the soil to densify
Sand
0.10.01
0
~/A rage of ~7/ 1//0sa d bollsI,
m SOda!yBoundaries
7 /for mostliquefiable soil
0
II I /0I
Boundaries
II /for potentielly
/liquefiable soil0
// / / V0
10Silt
may be just below the surface of thelakebed. Any addition of rainwater andthe water expelled by liquefaction seepsback into the deposit.
(4) Soda Lake lies within the ModifiedMercalli (M-M) VII intensity zone for theLoma Prieta earthquake (plafker andGalloway, 1989). Lateral spreading or
E•o:f 2
(I) The deposits have a uniform grainsize and almost total lack of cohesivedays that would tend to bind the partides together. The grain-size analysis(F19ure 4) shows that these sedimentsplot within the range of ~potentially
liquefiable soil" though not within the~most liquefiable soil" range.
(2) They were emplaced as a ~hydraulic
fill" that was deposited in and settledout of a still body of water. Prior to theLorna Prieta earthquake this fill had notbeen compacted. In this way, the fill atSoda Lake is similar 10 the fill thaI underlies much of the San FranciscoMarina District. The hydraulic fill underlying the Marina Disrtict also underwent extensive liquefaction during theLoma Prieta earthquake, which contributed to the wide-spread damage tobuildings. The Marina District fill iscoarser than the material at Soda Lakebut similar in its uniform grain size andlack of cohesive days (Bonilla, 1990).
(3) The Soda Lake deposits are probably saturated, even when the lake appears dry, because it is a natural basin.The level of the water table (depth togroundwater beneath the land surface)
230 CALIFORNIA GEOLOGY OCTOBER 1990
uniformly and increases subsequentresistance to liquefaction. However, avery strong shaking may cause unevendensification, leaving a topmost looserlayer with increased susceptibility toliquefaction~ (Hausner and others,1985, p. 58).
CONCLUSIONS
The earthquakes of April 18, 1990occurred on the anniversary of the1906 quake and six months after theLama Prieta event. They were a distinct reminder to the people of the SanFrancisco Bay area of the earthquakehazards associated with the San Andreas fault system. No surface ruptureand relatively little landsliding occurredduring the April 18 event, but theearthquakes did cause liquefaction of asandy silt deposit in Soda Lake that hadalso liquefied as a result of the LomaPrieta event in October. 1989.
The liquefaction of this deposit froma relatively small earthquake with a relatively short period of strong shakingshows that the hydraulically emplaceddeposits of Soda Lake are especiallysusceptible to liquefaction. even afterlhey were made more dense by liquefaction during the October 17. 1989earthquake. This repeated liquefactionof a hydraulic fill at Soda Lake suggeststhat repeated liquefaction of similar hydraulic fills around the margins of SanFrancisco Bay is also possible. Futureearthquakes in the San Francisco Bayarea could cause repeated liquefactionof the deposits that the Loma Prietaearthquake showed to be susceptible toliquefaction. such as those underlyingthe Marina District and along the eastern margin of San Francisco Bay.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
TABLE 1. GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS OF THREE SAMPLES FROM SODA LAKESAND BOilS. Adapted from F.H. Chin and J D Rogers written communication, 1990
Screen % Retained on screen (Cumulative % passing"size'
sand Boil 1 Sand Boil 2 Sand Boil 3 Average
No. 10
No. 20 0.04199.95 0.02199.98 0.03199.97 0.03199.97
No. 40 0.02/99.93 0.12/99.86 0.40/99.57 0.18/99.78
No. 60 0.04199.89 0.83/99.03 0.92/98.65 0.60199.19
No. 140 3.19/96.70 8.59/90.44 5.05/93.60 5.61193.58
No. 200 5.09/91.61 7.64/82.80 5.24/88.36 5.99/87.59
PO' 91.61 82.80 88.36 87.59
• Screen size indicates the number 01 wires per inch for woven wire mesh.•• Totals may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Photo 6. Electron micrograph of sit! grains that erupted from a sand volcano atSoda Lake. Bar scale is in microns. Photo taken al the U.c. Davis Facility forAdvanced Instrumentalion.
REFERENCESWe wish to thank Mark Molinari, ofDames and Moore, Jne., who broughtthe liquefaction at Soda Lake to our attention following the Lorna Prieta earthquake. We also wish to thank J. DavidRogers of Rogers-Pacific Inc., PleasantHill. California for test data and reviewof this article. Analyses were performed by F.H. Chin of Rogers-PacificCompany on samples collected by personnel of the Division of Mines and Geology and Rogers-Pacific Inc.
Alten. J.E., 1946, Geology 01 the San JuanBaullsta quadrangle, California: CaliforniaDivision Of Mines Bulletin 133, p. 75, 2plates, scale 1:62,500.
Borchardt. G.A. and Kennedy, M.P., 1979,Liquefaction potential in urban San Diego:A pilot study: CALIFORNIA GEOLOGY, v.32, no. 10. p. 217-221.
Bonilla, M.G" 1990, Natural and artificial deposits in the Marina District, in U.S. Geological SUNey. Effects 01 the Lorna Prietaearthquake on the Marina District, San
Francisco. California: U.S. GeologicalSUNey Open File 90-253.
Oibblee. T.W., Jr., arn::l Brabl>, E.E., 1978,Preliminary geologic maps of the Chittenden, Los Gatos. and Watsonville eastquadrangles. California: U.S. GeologicalSUNey Open File Report 78-453, 3sheets, scale 1:24,000.
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.1989. Lorna Prieta earthquake--Octooor17, 1989: Preliminary reconnaissancereport: EI Cerrito, California. 51 p.
CALIFORNIA GEOlOGY OCT06ER 1990 '"
Finn, W.D.L., Bransby, P.l., and Pickering,D.J.. 1970. Effects 01 strain history onliquefaction or sands: Journal of the SoilMechanics and Foundations Division,American Society of Civil Engineers, 96(SM6). p. 1917-1934.
Hart, EW.• Bryant, W.A., Wills, C.J., andTreiman. J.A.. 1990. The search for surface faulting and signilicance of ridgetopfissures, in S. McNutt and R.H. Sydnor,editors. The Loma Prieta earthquake ofOCtober 17, 1989: California Department01 Conservation, Division 01 Mines andGeology Special Publication 104, inpress.
Higgins, C.T., 1989, Anhur R. Wilsonquarry-where nature gives man abreak: CALIFORNIA GEOLOGY, v. 42,no. 11, p. 256·259.
Holzer, T.l., Youd, T.l.. and Hanks, T.C.•1989. Dynamics of liquefaction duringthe 1987 Superstition Hills earthquake,California. SCience. v. 244, p. 56-59.
Housner. G.W. and the Committee onEarthquake Engineering. National Research Council. 1985. Liquefaction ofsoils during earthquakes: National Acad·emy Press. Washington, D.C., 240 p.
Jenkins. O.P.• 1973. Pleistocene Lake SanBenito: CALIFORNIA GEOLOGY. v. 26.no. 7, p. 15"'63.
Keeler, O.K., 1984. Landslides caused byearthquakes: Geological Society 01America Bulletin, v. 95. p. 406-421.
Lawson, A. C., and others, 1908, The Cali·lornia earthquake 01 April 18, 1906: Re·port of the State Earthquake Investigation Commission: Carnegie Institute 01Washington Publication 87, 2 volumes,452 p.
Lindh. A. and Lester. R., 1990. Weeklyearthquake report for the San FranciscoBay area, 16--23 April, 1990: U.S. Geological Survey, 5 p.
Manson. M.W., Keeter, O.K., andMcKittrick. M.A.. compilers. Landslidesand other geologic features in the SantaCruz Mountains, California, resultingfrom the Loma Priela earthquake ofOCtober 17. 1989: Calilornia Departmentof Conservation, Division ot Mines andGeology Preliminary Report 29, inprogress.
Minster, J.B., and Jordan. T.H.. 1987. Vee·lor constraints on western U.S. deformation from space geodesy. neotectonics,and plate motions: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 92, no. B6. p. 47984804.
Perkins, J.A., Sims, J.D., and Sturgess,5.5.,1989, Late Holocene movementalong the San Andreas fault at MelendyRanch: Implications for the distribution01 fault slip in central California: Journal
of Geophysical Research, v. 94, no. 68.p. 10,217-10,230.
Plafker, G. and Galloway, J.p.. editors,1989. Lessons learned from the LomaPrieta. California. earthquake of October17,1989: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1045. 48 p.
Tsuchida. H.. 1970, Predicfion and counlermeasure against the liquetaction in sanddeposits: Abstract of the Seminar in thePort and Harbor Research Institute. p.3.1'3.33 (in Japanese).
Wagner, D.l., 1990. Geologic and tectonicsetting of the epicentral area of the LomaPrieta earthquake. Santa Cruz Mountains, centra! California. in S. McNutt andR.H. Sydnor, editors. The Loma Prietaearthquake of October 17, 1989: California Department of Conservation. Divisionof Mines and Geology Special Publica·tion 104, in press.
Youd, T.l., 1973, Liquefaction, flow. and as·sociated ground failure: U.S. GeologicalSurvey Circular 688. 12 p.
Youd, T.L.. and Hoose. S.N.. 1977. liquefaction susceptibilily and geologic setting:Proceedings of Ihe Sixth World Confer·ence on Earthquake Engineering. v. 3. p.2189·2194, Prenlice Hall, Inc.
Youd, T.l., and Hoose, S.N" 1978, Historicground failures in northern California triggered by earthquakes: U.S. GeologicalSurvey Prolessional Paper 993, 177 p. ~
CALIFORNIA GEOLOGYWelcomes New Editor
CAUFORNIA GEOLOGY ispleased to welcome Lena Tabilio toits staff. Lena. a graduate of the Uni·versity of San Francisco, will assistthe Technical Editor in researching,editing, and writing articles.
Lena comes to State seruice after13 years of priuate industry andfreelance technical and promotionalwriting experience. She also has anextensive marketing and publicrelations background. ~
232 CALIFORNIA GEOLOGY OCTOBER 1990
Book Reviews
•
Regional Geology
VOLCANISM AND TECTONISM in the Columbia River RoodBasalt Province. SpeCial Paper 239. Edited by Stephen P. Reideland Peter R Hopper. Available from the Geological Society ofAmerica. PO, Box 9140. Boulder. Co 80301. 400 p .. paper cover.1 plate. $52.50 postpaid.
The geologic history and structural evolution of the ColumbiaRiver Plateau has long intrigued geologists and other scientists. h isan area that has been shaped in part by catastrophic nooding. aod bytectonic events. occurring and re-occurring on a grand scale. However. these events often occurred Oller a very short period 01 lime.
The Columbia Plateau occupies an area large enough to containthe six New England slales ilnd is approximately 62.320 squaTemiles. During Miocene and early Pliocene time. lava welled up frombeneath the continental plate and inlennitlently poured 001 creatingwhat today is the Columbia Plateau. The process may have beensimilar to what is happening today on ocean floors on both sides ofoceanic rifts. Extrusive events produced enough layered flow rock to
Photo 2. This spectacular panorama shows the Grande RondeRiver meandering through a valley which has been cut into thelayered basalt plateau. The erosive 'orces 01 the river haveexposed more than a dozen individual Ilows. The river isapparently approaching base level. The rate of down cutting issubsiding as evidenced by the meandering course. The layercake form of rocks which make up the flood-basalt province isvery evident. Basalt flows are often easily eroded by fast movingwater In streams due to characteristic Joint patterns. Courtesy ofWashington Srare Division of Geology and Earth Resources.
Books reviewed in thIS sectIon ale not available for purchase hom DMG.
Photo 1. This is a view of one wall of Frenchman Springs coulee.A coulee is a long. steep-walled, trench-like gorge or valley. Thephoto was taken trom Highway 90 at a point between Vantageand George, Washington. Several flat·lying basalt layers ot varying thickness deposited by different tlow events can be seen inthe vertical 'ace 01 Ihe coulee wall. Weathering has caused disin·tegration of the wall and deposits 01 talus at its base. Courtesy ofWashington Srare Division of Geology and Earth Resources.
cover approximately one half of Oregon and one quarter of Washington. a large portion of western and southern klaho, and parts of California. and Nevada. Totalll'Olume of these flow basalts is approximately 41.520 cubic miles. Some individual IIows are less tnan 50feet thick however. aggregate average fhickness of the flood basalts isoolieved to be a lillie over 3.200 feet on fhe average. Basaltic Iavilproduced during individual eruptions was apparently not very viscous.hence it did oot form cones around vents and traveled great distances{I 00 miles or more) before solidifying completely.
Speciill Paper 239 is a compilation of 25 papers resulting from acomprehensive invesfigafion of fhis region. These studies stress theoverall importance of an adequate stratigraphic framework in understanding this continental flood basalt province. Interpretations arebased on knowledge of flow strafigraphy acquired through field petrography. magnetic polarity. and chemical analyses. Striltigraphyprovides the basis for current understanding of the morphological andstructural evolution of the province. Investigafors subdivided the plateau info individual eruptions and. at the same lime. characterized thelarger packages of nows by using related chemical and/or physicalcharacferistics that act as common stratigraphic indicators in theirevolufion.
In addition to an increased knowledge of the stratigraphy of theColumbia River Plateau, there now exists greater knowledge andunderstanding of the infernal feafures of flood-basalt flows and thephysical processes of flow emplacemenf and cooling. Even simpleflows are now known to result from a complex series of processes.Analysis of relationships bel\veen individual eruptions has enabled investigators to create a flow-by-f1ow record of the morphological andstructural evoluliOll of the province. Dating and analysis of individualfolds and faults on the Columbia Plateau yield accurate mcxIels of thetectOllic evolution in this part of fhe Pacific Northwest.
Individual eruptions have produced flows 1.Vith volumes of up to480 cubic miles. In addition to volume. several factors induding rapidextrusion rates. linear vent systems. and the absence of collapsecalderas, indicate there are large magma reservoirs at or near the baseof the crus/. However. the origins of various magmas which formedthe Columbia River basalt province are complex and remain controversial. Reviewed bV Richard Boylan.
(... mor8 books on pagB 238)
CALIfORNIA GEOLOGY OCTOBER 1990 233
I ndustry and consumer alike depend upon commodities delivered by truck because it is often the most expedient fOnTI of
transport. California is the leading trucking stale in the nation. Of the 39 million trucks in the United States. Californiahas more than 4.3 million or about 11 percent. More than 98percent of all commodities in California are transported viatruck. In 1987 the trucking industry in this state provkled725,000 jobs with earnings of over $16 billion. Nearly 70percent of the 10\4II'IS and cities in California are solely dependent on trucking to deliver needed supplies.
Trucks are also important 10 the mining industry and ena1»eremote mines to operate economically. Occasionally the mosteffkient way to haul very heavy mining equipment is by truck.Photos 1 and 2 show large pieces of ore processing equipment being transported by trucks to mines. While this mayappear costly and time consuming, moving such equipmentoften saves lNI?eks or months of expensive tear-down and reassembly at the mine site. Other benefits of moving largeequipment intact include minimizing damage and shortenedproduction schedules.
Photo 1 shows ill mammoth 425,000 JX>llIld autoclavebeing moved 275 miles to a gold mine north of Flko. Nevada.Although autoclaves have been used extensively since the 17thcentury. their use in the mining industry is relatively recent.Large autocla\JE!$ are used to extract gold from sulfide ore.
TransportirrcJ
CALIFORNIA GEOLOGY OCTQ8EA 1990
A.fining Equipment By Truck
- - -..
Photo 1. A gigantic 425,000 pound autocla....e being transported275 miles along pUblic roads 10 a gold mine north of Elko, Nevada in June 1989. The entire unit includes two specially moditied tractors: the Iront traclor as a 'poller" and the rear traclor asa ·pusher." The entire load was 262leetlong. 21 feet wide, 18leet tall, al1d grossed 704,500 pounds. All 164 tires made contact with the road. This was the heaviest, largest. and longestload ever moved on a freeway. Due to the extreme weight andlength. this shipment was limited to 40 miles per hour on thefreeway. The lull cooperation 01 slale and local authorities wasobtained, and the route was carefully planned. Photos courtesyof Jake's Crane, Rigging, and Transpor1lnternational.
... Photo 2. Transporting a 170.000 pound. 20-'oot diameter. 14tool high grinding milt 600 miles to a mine site in northern Nevada. The "pusher" tractor has a 15 1001 push bar and carries25.000 pounds of ballast for traction on its drive wheels. Transporting large pieces 01 mining equipment by truck saves costswhile increasing the efficiency 01 mining operations.
The process involves cooking the ore at high temperatureunder high pressure in the autoclave. Large autoclaves likethe one in Photo 1 are effectively utilized in Califomia goldmines.
Photo 2 shows a 20 foot diameter ore grinding mill beingmoved from Kingman. Arizona to a mine site in northemNevada. Previously. such large pieces of equipment had tobe either disassembled for transport or simply could not betransported at all and had to be fabricated in the field at themine site. ~
CALIFORNIA GEOLOGY OCTOBER 1990 235
[~ M_in_e_ra_'_1i_r_iv_ia__~J
(l) What is the difference in meaning between the words "karat"ana ~caral~?
(2) When and where was the firstproducing oil well in California?
(3) What is the largest oil field inCalifornia?
(4) How deep. was the deeoest oilwell drillea in California'?
POOla 2, Called the ·Parller Aig No. 162,this rig is capable of drilling to 25.000 teet.II is one of the largest land-based drillingrigs in the wortd. The height from groundlevel to the lop is over 200 feel. Electricalpower lor the rig is supplied by banks 01large diesel engines with pistons the size of5-gallon buckets-the same type 01 enginesused on modern diesel electric trains.
CALIFORNIA GEOLOGY
Photo 1. Large exploratory oilrig when il was used to drililhe22,735-1001 test hole for theDepartment 01 Energy at theElk Hills Naval Reserve, KernCounty. The accompanyingphotos depict the sophisticatedtechnology of this rig andillustrate the progress in oilexploration since Ihe first oitwells were drilled In Californiaduring the 1860s. Photos byMike Glinzak, courtesy of theDivision of Oil and Gas.
PholO 3. Drill pipe slacked next to fhe rig. Called "joints: eachlenglh of pipe is about 40 feet long and weIghs aboul 1,000pounds. When these pipes are used on the rig. Ihree joints of pipeare screwed togelher inlo a lenglh at pipe called a ·sland: Standsare stacked venically on lhe rig tloor unlillhey are used to drill.Every time a drilling bit is worn down, the entire length of pipecalled the "drill string" is pulled out ollhe hole by 12O-loot standsections. Pulling 22,000 leet 01 drilling pipe oul of the hole.replacing the drill bit. then returning lhe entire drill string into thehole is a tedious and arduous process thaI requires most of a day.
OCTOBER 1990
Photo 4. Workers screwing drill pipe. To change a drill bit, eachstand is unscrewed as the drill string is lifted, then reconnectedwhen the new bit is in place. Drilling is rigorous work and is done24 hours a day, 7 days a week in all types 01 weather. A drillcrew requires good teamwork: safety is emphasized at all times.
Answers
Photo 5. Powerful mud pumps located next to the rig. No deepwell could be drilled wilhout drilling mud for several reasons. Onereason why drilling mud is essential is because it is the onlymeans available for controlling the extreme physical forces thatoccur in the drill hole thousands of feel beneath the ground sur·lace: without the weighl of the drilling mud to hold the hole open,the hote would implode at depth. Another reason is because mudlubricates the drilling processes. Without mud the friction betweenthe drill string. the drill bit, and the rock it penetrates would become overwhelming. Drill mud is also used to condition the holeand to carry out the rock cuttings. Much care is devoted to clean,monitor, and precisely combine various mineral additives, such asbarite and bentonite clay. into the mud.
Photo 6. The vertical metallic column(commonly referred to as the "stack") inthe center of this photo shows blowoutprevention equipment that is located beneath the drill lloor and above the groundsurface. A blowout is an uncontrolled flowof drill hole lIuids: it is extremely dangerous and can seriously deplete the totalamount of oil recovered from a lield.Blowout prevention is critical when drillingdeep exploratory oil wells. The diNerenttypes of blowout prevention equipmentshown in the stack allow the drill string tofreely pass through Irom the drill lloor intothe ground. When the drill bit enters arock formation that is under extreme pres·sure with natural gas or lIuids at depth,combinations of these blowout preventiondevices are used in conjunction with thedrilling mud to stabilize the pressures.
(1) Karat is used to Indicate the purityo! gold. One karat is equal to 1124th thetotal amount 01 pure gold in an alloy.Pure gold is 24 karats. Gold With a lowerkarat number, such as 18-karat gold,indicates that the gold cont3Jns 18 parts01 gold mixed with 6 parts of anothermetal, usually copper or silVer. Carat isused as a measure of weight in preciousgems such as diamonds, emeralds. andrubies. Five carals are equal to 0.035ounce (one carat is 200 milligrams). So agemstone weighing 1 ounce would beabout 142 carats. Both lerms karat andcarat are derived from the Greek word"keration," meaning "carob bean." Carobbeans were used in arlClent Greece asweight standards.
(2) The lirst producing oil well in California was drilled in1861, only two yearsalter the first oil well in the United Stateswas drilled near TItusville, Pennsylvania.It was located on the north lork 01 theManole River near Petrolia, HumboldtCounty. "Petrolia" IS derived from theword petroleum.
(3) The largesl oil lield in Calilomia isthe Elk Hills Naval Petroleum Reserve,Kern County. It is an oval-shaped areaaboul 14 miles by 8 miles and has oilreserves estimated at 742.5 million barrels (one barrel is equal 10 42 gallons).At 21,600 acres in area. Elk Hills edgesout nearby Midway Sunset oil field by amere 340 acres.
(4) The deepest oil well drilled in California was 22,735 feet deep at Elk HillsNaval Pelroleum Reserve west 01 Bakerslield (Photos 1-6). In contrast. theaverage ell well in California is about4,400 feet deep and the deepest produc·ing oil well in CaHlornia is at 14.680 leeltn the Rio Viejo oilliald, Kern County.The deepest exploratory oil well dnlled inIhe United States was in Oklahoma andreached 31,444 leel. 'X'
CALIFORNIA GEOLOGY OCTOBER 1990
[~._._._m_o_r_e_B_o_o_k_R_e_v_ie_w_s~J
Earthquake
COLOR PHOTOGRAPHS (35mm)SUDES SHOWING EXAMPlES OFSTRUCT1JRAL DAMAGE AND SURFlCIAL EFFECTS OF THE M7.1 ocroBER 17, 1989. LOMA PRIETA, CAUFORNIA EARTHQUAKE. Compiled byCynthia C. Ramseyer. Specify U.S,Geological Survey Open-File Report89-687. 1989. Books and Open-FileReports Section. Brdflch of Distribution,U.S. Geok::agkal Survey. Box 2545.Federal Center. Denver. CO 80225. 36color slides. $72.00. make checks payable to: Department of Imerior-USGS.
Collapsed section of the Cypress 1-880 freeway structure,Oakland, California. Photo by M. Rymer/USGS.
Highway 1 bridge collapse, Struve Slough, Pajaro Valley. Calilornla.Photo by J. Tinsley/USGS.
The 36 slides in this set were takenby geologists of the M7.1 Lorna Prietaearthquake effects during the week following the temblor. This slide set willbe of interest to teachers and otherprofessionals concerned with informing others about the damaging effectsof earthquakes. Although the strongshaking associated with the quakelasted less than 15 seconds. it caused67 deaths. more than 3.500 injuries.and dose 10 $6 billion in propertydamage. This U.S. Geological Surveyslide set shows damage caused by thequake to a variety of structures including; unreinforced masonry. olderwooden houses. the San Francisco-
n. CALIfORNIA GEOlCXiY OCTOBER 1990
1----------------------------MAIL ORDER FORM
SPECIAL PUBLICATIONS__ SP33 Minerals ond rocks. 1962 S 1.00__ SP41 Bosic p[ocer mining. 1946 S 2.00__ SP59 Proceedings of mined [ond reclomation worluhop, June 11.12, 1980. 1982 $ 9.50__ SP86 Foothills counties mining handbook. 1985 S 4.00__ SP87 P[ocer gold recovery methods. 1986 .. ,............. S 2.50
$ 7.00$10.00$ 8.00S 9.00
S10.00S20.OOS 1.25
S 10.00$ 7.50
Price includespostage and solo.. lox
CALiFORN!A GEOLOGY__ 1yeof [12 issuesl . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .__ 2 yeo" (24 iuuesl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .__ Bock iuues (Specify volume ond month) todividuo[ i.,ues S1.25 each .
COUNTY REPORT__ CR4 Mines ond mineral fesources of Trinity County. 1965 ...__ CR6 Mine. and mineral fe'OUrCe. of Sho,lo County. 1974
SPECIAL REPORTS__ SR120 Geology for p[onning in Sonomo County. 1980 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. S 13.50__ SR143 Port 5 Minerol [ood c1ouifico!ion of the greoler Los Ange[es oreo, c1ossificotioo
of sond ond grovel resources oreos, Sougus·Newholl prodUdionconsumption region ond Polmdo[e production-coosumplion region,1987 ("ewl . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . S 8.00
__ SR146 Port 6 Mineral [ond clossificotion: aggregate moterio[. in theSon Froncioco·Monterey Boy oreo.1988 (new) ... S20.oo
__ SRIS6 Minero[ lol'd dossificotio" of portland cement concrete·grode aggregatein the Socromento·Foirfie[d production·coMumption region. 1987. (new) ..... S18.00
__ SR163 Surface ond groundwater monogement in surfoce mined-[ond reclomotion.1989 (new) S10.oo
Indicote number of copies
•BULLETINS__ B189 Minerals of Colifornio. 1966 .__ 8190 Geology of no"hern Co[ifornia. 1966 ......•.__ 8193 Gold districts of Co[ifornio. 1970 .__ 8208 Zeolites in Colifornio. 1988 (new) .
Complete oddress form 00 ned poge
IIIII TOTAL AMOUNTfNCLOSEO . . . .. $---
L ~~~~~~~~~~~~ _
Collapsed section 01 the SanFrancisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. ....Phoro by H. Wilshire/USGS.
Oakland Bay Bridge. the Cypress 1-880freeway overpass in Oakland, and theHighway 1 bridge collapse at StruveSlough. Pajaro Valley. In addition tostructural damage, this slide set showsexamples of surface expression on theground surface caused by the quakeand includes; extension cracks, landslides. rock falls, ground deformation,collapse of coastal bluff. and sand boils.
In 1974 the Cordilleran Section 01 theGeological Society of America held its 70thannual meeting in Las Vegas. Significantchanges in the geological interpretation ofthe Mojave Desert and the southwesternGreat Basin have occurred in the succeeding14 years. Factors accounting for the evolution of this interpretation include renewedinterest by young geologists, better geologicmapping. beller analytical tools such as reomote sensing and geochronology. and continuing exploration by a cadre of geologistslong associated with the area.
Tectonism is the focus of the 18 fieldexcursions covering an area from Utah toCalifornia to nonhern Mexico. The mecha~
nism for this tectonic activity is emphaSizedin this volume. GeologiC problems discussedin this book include the recognition 01 Cenozoic low-angle. listric-normal faults that occurwithin the major Mesozoic thrust belts, thetiming and amount of regional extension.<Inc! the rel<ltion between extensional tectonism <100 regional volcanism. Other geologicproblems include (I) the genesis and geochemistry of major gold deposits throughoutNevada. Arizona. and California; (2) theinterpretation of the Paleoroic depositionalenvironments using ichnofOSSils (trace fossils); (3) the techniques appropriate for determining the <lge 01 well-eemented alluvial fandeposits; and (4) the interpretation of sediments deposited in Mesozoic arcs thatformed from Utah to nonhem Ba}a California. Reviewed by Sy/vlo Bender-Lomb. ~
Structural Geology
THIS EXTENDED LAND: GeologicalJourneys in the Southern Basin and Range.Geological Society of America, CordilleranSection Meeting. Field Trip Guidebook. LawVegas. Nevada. 1988. Edited by David L.Weide and Marianne L. Faber. 1988. Avail·able Irom, Depa"ment of Geoscience, UniII(!rsity of Nevada, Las Vegas. Las Vegas,NE. 330 p. $22.00. soft cover.
CALIFORNIA GEOLOGY OCTOBER 1990 239
STATE Of CAJ.JFOIlNlATHE RESOURCES AGeNCf
DEPARTMENT Of CONSERVAOClNCAUfORNlA GEOLOGY
1WISlON~
MINES N«) GlOlOGYPO &OX 2980
SAClAMfNTO. CAIJClItM 9.5ll1200 131
USPS""'"ADOIESS CORlECT1ON IfOUESTED
SECOND CWS POSTAGE'AJOAT SAClAMENTO. CAUfOlNlA.
Call For Papers
----------------------------,ADDRESS FORM FOR ALL ORDERS
PINse pord or type
PAYitlENT ""UST BE INCLUDED Wl7H ORDER
The management of CAUFORNIAGEOLOGY invites articles aboul
the earth sciences. Articles need notnecessarily pertain solely to California.although the subject matter of the articles should be relevanl 10 the citizensof this stale. For example. simplifiedartkles designed for generallntereslsuch as ·Uses of Bacteria For MineralsProcessing." ~Reclamationof In-Stream
Mining Operations.· or MBase Isolationand Earthquake Building Design M wouldbe welcome. Articles need not be writlen exclusively by earth scientists; inpast issues. students and lay personshave conlributed numerous successfularticles. Each author receives 25 complimentary copies of an Issue when lhearticle is published.
A new management policV 0'lows for remuneration for articlesIn some Instances. A modest sti·pend will be paid for acceptableearth science related articles thatare well-written. well-illustrated.and are of interest to the audience of CALIFORNIA GEOLOGY.Stipends start at $100 andamounts above that are negotiable. Potential authors shouldsubmit an outline and a summaryof the proposed article to 'heEditor at the below address.
.....E
ADORESS _
ClTy _
STATE Z,p _
A free -Guidelines fOf CAUFORNIAGEOLOGY Authors- is avaiLa~ uponrequest and aD prospectiYe authors areadvised 10 write to the Editor for clarification prior 10 writing articles. Every ac·cepted ankle wiD be edited.
____.T,;,;OTAl AMOUNT ENCLOSED: ~s _
CALIFORNIA GEOLOGY SUBSCRIPTIONS
o I yr. .$10.00 0 2 yr. .$20.00 (IndIvidual issues are $1.25 each)
o NEW SUBSCRIPTION: AllOw 60 days lor delivery oflirst issue
o RENEWAL: To receive your magazine COOllnUOlJsIy. send In renewal 60 days beforeexpiratioo date ShOwn on your address label. (Example EXP9012 meansIhallhe subSCriptIOn expires on receipt of December 1990 Issue.) Pleaseeodose address label from past issue. Witnout an address label. renewalsubscriptions wi1I take 3to. monthS 10 process
CAlJfORHIAGfCllOGY ......... onIr .111 ...."_."-...,..-.0..... _ ....."- .llIIIt _
Because articles included in CAUFORNIA GEOLOGY are designed 10 be readby high school graduates who are curiousabout the earth sciences of Callfomla.technical articles will have to be revtsedby the author and/or edited to confonnwith the magazine readership. ScholarlysubjeclS should be clarified and made underslandable to a broad audience.
For author guidelines. questions. orcomments regarding CAUFORNIAGEOLOGY magazine please write 10'
Ed,torCAUFORNIA GEOLOGYDivision of Mines and Geology660 Bercut 0nYeSacnmenlo. CA 95814-0131 ~
send us an o6d address label and your new address.Allow 60 days for address change.
EXPIR. DATE ACCT # _10# _
o GIFT: (Gittcarn from _
o ADDRESS CHANGE:
You. ord""lUbscription annot ~ proceued unle.. correct emounlls remilled All Forellln sndc.n.dlBn ordef's muSl be~ with en Internetional Money Order or Oral' PBYIlOle WI UNleel Slat"fundi; 10' DrmIon of M:"" end G4toIogy. Address ell orders to: DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOlOGY.PO. 8012980. Saeramento. C8l1lornia 95812·2980.
----------------------------~
2.. CALIFORNIA GEOlOGY OCToec:R 1990