Top Banner
California Gasoline Transport James Montgomery & Karen Teague
50

California Gasoline Transport

Feb 24, 2016

Download

Documents

Yan

California Gasoline Transport. James Montgomery & Karen Teague. Background. Williams Tank Lines is one of the largest for-hire bulk petroleum carriers in California (Fuel Transport Co.) Founded by Michael Williams - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: California Gasoline Transport

California Gasoline Transport

James Montgomery&

Karen Teague

Page 2: California Gasoline Transport

Background

Williams Tank Lines is one of the largest for-hire bulk petroleum carriers in California (Fuel Transport Co.)

Founded by Michael Williams

Moving diesel and gasoline fuel to over 300 customers like the major gas stations you use everyday (ie.-Shell, Chevron, Arco, USA, etc.)

The company operates over 100 trucks out of 9 different terminal locations in California and 2 locations in Nevada.

This project focuses on 1 of the terminal locations2

Page 3: California Gasoline Transport

Problem Statement

This project seeks to answer the following questions: What are the minimum number of trucks Mike needs in order to

full fill the normal network of Demands?

What are the effects of losing a refueling station at either Brisbane or San Jose?

What are the effects of losing individual refueling lanes?

How many 15 min traffic jams will keep Mike from delivering his loads in a 10 hour day?

3

Page 4: California Gasoline Transport

Overview

Fuel flow as a Min-Cost Flow Model

Goal: Make all deliveries at minimum cost (truck hours), satisfying all demand requirements

Key modifications to the basic model Unmet demands drives the flow (high penalty cost)

Add cost (nC=∞) for Unsatisfied Demand in the objective function we are minimizing

Because trucks make more than one delivery per day, a standard supply/demand network won’t work. All node demands are zero Demands tracked by flow over delivery arcs

4

Page 5: California Gasoline Transport

Overview

Measure of Effectiveness: Number of trucks needed to meet demands and total time to complete all deliveries

Assumptions: Time to every city and intersection = 15min. Interdictions begin after the 1st Time period

5

Page 6: California Gasoline Transport

Model Set-up(Parameters)

San Jose has 14 total trucks operating

All trucks start full and end empty in San Jose

6

Fuel Demand

City Demand San Jose 37 Palo Alto 9 Menlo Park 9 San Mateo 8 San Bruno 6 San Francisco 30

Fuel Suppliers

San Jose (21) Brisbane (8)

Page 7: California Gasoline Transport

Northern CA Gasoline Transport

7

Page 8: California Gasoline Transport

Model Set-up(Nodes)

Nodes Start, End Supply Cities, Demand Cities, Major Intersections Attached time layers (15min. Increments for a total of 10 hours)

8

Start SJ2SJ1 ... SJ40 End

Page 9: California Gasoline Transport

Model Set-up(Nodes)

Each City/Time Node is divided into two separate nodes: Full and Empty Represents a truck’s status upon entering the city

9

StartSJ2E

SJ1E ...

...

SJ40E End

SJ2F

SJ1F

SJ40F

TIME PERIOD 1 TIME PERIOD 2 TIME PERIOD 3

Page 10: California Gasoline Transport

Model Set-up(Arcs)

Between adjacent/same City nodes with concurrent time periods

10

Exception Long Road Sections

SJ1F

PA1F

SJ1E

SJ2F

PA2F

SJ2E

SJ3F

PA3F

SJ3E

TIME PERIOD 1 TIME PERIOD 2 TIME PERIOD 3

Start

End

(100, 0, ∞)

Page 11: California Gasoline Transport

Northern CA Gasoline Transport

11

Page 12: California Gasoline Transport

Model Set-up(Arcs)

Nodes can only connect to an adjacent node if they have the same Empty/Full Status

12

Exceptions Delivery and Refueling Arcs

SJ1F

PA1F

PA1E

SJ2F

PA2F

PA2E

SJ3F

PA3F

PA3E

TIME PERIOD 1 TIME PERIOD 2 TIME PERIOD 3

Start

End

(100, 0, ∞)

Page 13: California Gasoline Transport

Graphical Model for Demand

13

Empty Nodes

PAE4

Demand

PAF2

PAE5PAF3

PAF4

(cij, 0, ∞)

1

3

1PAE6

+

+

= 9

* This is the onlyway to cross from the full network to the empty network.

Page 14: California Gasoline Transport

Graphical Model for Refueling

14

BACK INTO SYS

SanJE5 SanJF7

SanJE6 SanJF8

SanJE7 SanJF9

SanJF10SanJE8

}(SUM ≤ 21)} (SUM ≤ 21)

8+10+11+7 * This is the only

way to cross from the empty network to the full network.

Page 15: California Gasoline Transport

Mathematical Model(caveman version)

15

OBJ: min

s.t. Netflow constraintsDelivery RequirementsRefueling Limitations

Page 16: California Gasoline Transport

Attack Scenario Notes

Problem is extremely computer intensive Extremely large number of possible solutions Costs for arcs approximately equal Delivery arcs are integer constrained

Primal and Dual objective values are suboptimal

Evaluate the data for trends rather than exact pivot points

16

Page 17: California Gasoline Transport

Scenarios

Baseline (no attacks) : What is the minimum number of trucks and the minimum cost to satisfy all demands?

Attack Scenario 1: What are the effects of losing an entire Refueling station for a time period?

Attack Scenario 2: What are the effects of losing individual refueling lanes at the refueling stations?

Attack Scenario 3: What are the effects or temporary traffic jams?

17

Page 18: California Gasoline Transport

Baseline (no attacks)

All demand satisfied – 13 trucks required Total Cost = 152 hours

18

Page 19: California Gasoline Transport

Attack Scenario 1

Attack Scenario 1: What are the effects of losing an entire Refueling station for a time period?

19

Page 20: California Gasoline Transport

Attack Scenario 1: Refueling Arcs

20

1 Attack

X

Page 21: California Gasoline Transport

Attack Scenario 1: Refueling Arcs

21

2 Attacks

X2

Page 22: California Gasoline Transport

Attack Scenario 1: Refueling Arcs

22

3 Attacks

X

X2

Page 23: California Gasoline Transport

Attack Scenario 1: Refueling Arcs

23

4-7 Attacks

X4-7

Page 24: California Gasoline Transport

Attack Scenario 1: Refueling Arcs

24

8 Attacks

X7

X

Page 25: California Gasoline Transport

Attack Scenario 1: Refueling Arcs

25

9 Attacks

X8

X

Page 26: California Gasoline Transport

Attack Scenario 1: Refueling Arcs

26

10 Attacks

X4

X6

Page 27: California Gasoline Transport

27

Attack Scenario 1: Operator Resilience Curve

Page 28: California Gasoline Transport

28

Attack Scenario 1: Operator Resilience Curve

Page 29: California Gasoline Transport

Attack Scenario 2

Attack Scenario 2: What are the effects of losing individual refueling lanes at the refueling stations?

31

Page 30: California Gasoline Transport

Attack Scenario 2: Refuel Lane Attacks

32

1-8 Lanes Down

X8

Page 31: California Gasoline Transport

Attack Scenario 2: Refuel Lane Attacks

33

9 Lanes Down and Beyond

X8

X

Page 32: California Gasoline Transport

34

Attack Scenario 2: Operator Resilience Curve

Page 33: California Gasoline Transport

35

Attack Scenario 2: Operator Resilience Curve

Page 34: California Gasoline Transport

Attack Scenario 3

Attack Scenario 3: What are the effects or temporary traffic jams closures?

36

Page 35: California Gasoline Transport

Attack Scenario 3: Road Arc Attacks

37

1 – 15 minute traffic jam

X

Page 36: California Gasoline Transport

Attack Scenario 3: Road Arc Attacks

38

2 – 15 minute traffic jams

X

X

Page 37: California Gasoline Transport

Attack Scenario 3: Road Arc Attacks

39

3 - 15 minute traffic jams

X

XX

Page 38: California Gasoline Transport

Attack Scenario 3: Road Arc Attacks

40

4 - 15 minute traffic jams

X3X

Page 39: California Gasoline Transport

Attack Scenario 3: Road Arc Attacks

41

5 - 15 minute traffic jams

X3

XX

Page 40: California Gasoline Transport

Attack Scenario 3: Road Arc Attacks

42

6 - 15 minute traffic jams

X2X4

Page 41: California Gasoline Transport

Attack Scenario 3: Road Arc Attacks

43

7 - 15 minute traffic jams

X2X

X3

X

Page 42: California Gasoline Transport

Attack Scenario 3: Road Arc Attacks

44

8 - 15 minute traffic jams

X4

X

X3

Page 43: California Gasoline Transport

Attack Scenario 3: Road Arc Attacks

45

9 - 15 minute traffic jams

X2

X

X6

Page 44: California Gasoline Transport

Attack Scenario 3: Road Arc Attacks

46

10 - 15 minute traffic jams

X2

X

X7

Page 45: California Gasoline Transport

47

Attack Scenario 3: Operator Resilience Curve

Page 46: California Gasoline Transport

48

Attack Scenario 3: Operator Resilience Curve

Page 47: California Gasoline Transport

Summary & Conclusion

49

System sensitive to changes in Refueling Lanes and Refueling Arcs, but robust against traffic jams.

Brisbane refueling capacity is the chokepoint

Page 48: California Gasoline Transport

Future Work

Adding nodes and arcs Create full operations for San Jose Terminal

Includes deliveries on and refueling stations on the East side of the bay and deliveries south down the coast all the way to Santa Maria.

Add a second shift Create a problem specific algorithm or heuristic in

order to reduce run times to a manageable level. What are the most efficient times to start shifts

according to traffic congestions?

Page 49: California Gasoline Transport

References

Dave Teague (Terminal Manager of San Jose branch): All Truck Data (cost of operations, routes, scheduling, etc.) Locations: refueling, demand cities

Googlemaps: http://maps.google.com/

Page 50: California Gasoline Transport

Questions?

52