CALIFORNIA E-RECORDING SUMMIT Implementing the Electronic Recording Delivery Act February 2005 Sacramento, CA San Bernardino County Business Case for Electronic Recording Presented By: De Ana Thompson Chief Deputy Recorder For Larry Walker Auditor/Controller-Recorder of San Bernardino County
12
Embed
CALIFORNIA E-RECORDING SUMMIT Implementing the Electronic Recording Delivery Act February 2005 Sacramento, CA San Bernardino County Business Case for Electronic.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
CALIFORNIA E-RECORDING SUMMITImplementing the Electronic Recording Delivery Act
February 2005 Sacramento, CA
San Bernardino CountyBusiness Case
for Electronic Recording
Presented By:De Ana ThompsonChief Deputy Recorder ForLarry WalkerAuditor/Controller-Recorder of San Bernardino County
Page 2CALIFORNIA E-RECORDING SUMMIT
Implementing the Electronic Recording Delivery ActFebruary 2005 Sacramento, CA
Introduction
• The Recorder’s office is under continual pressure to record title companies’ property-related documents as quickly as possible.
• Due to the competitive nature of the real estate industry, title companies rely on timely and accurate recordation of documents. The release of funds to escrow and payoffs of existing loans and other encumbrances depend upon the documents being recorded.
• Multiple parties, such as real estate agents, escrow officers, title companies, lenders, and buyers wait for confirmation that documents are recorded.
• In some cases, the buyer is waiting for the above-mentioned to move into their home and moving vans are waiting for the go ahead.
• The real estate industry is extremely competitive and each party involved has an important stake in the outcome.
Page 3CALIFORNIA E-RECORDING SUMMIT
Implementing the Electronic Recording Delivery ActFebruary 2005 Sacramento, CA
The Title Company Submission Process in 2001
Examiner &
Title Company clerks arrives @
7:00
Title Co. clerk submits
documents to Examiiner & signs in with how many
docs they are recording
Title Co. clerk is called in order of
sign in sheet. Sits with
Examiner while docs are being
recorded.
Examiner examines all
docs for recordability and
legibility. Records or
rejects.
Rejected
documents
Documents are indexed and verified for correctness
Cashier and Tile Co. clerk verify the document
count to ensure their were no
errors
Title Co. clerk calls each title
officer to confirm
confirmations
Recorder prepares docs for
scanning
Microfilm is
created
Cashier waits for
the Title Co. clerk
Cashier hand stamps each
document with the recording date and time
Cashier verbally gives Title Co.
clerk the document numbers
Examiner walks documents to be
recorded to cashier
Documents are
scanned
End
Title Co. clerk matches each
document number to each order number
Paper document
is mailed out
Title Co. Recorder
Page 4CALIFORNIA E-RECORDING SUMMIT
Implementing the Electronic Recording Delivery ActFebruary 2005 Sacramento, CA
Why the Industry needs E-Recording
• Title Company or Service Company clerk would deliver documents and wait and wait until all documents were examined, recorded and cashiered. (This might take most of the day.)
• Title Company or Service Company clerk might have to travel long distances to meet the specific timeframes for recording. San Bernardino County is the largest geographic county in the country (over 20,000 square miles). This makes it very difficult for these companies to plan their days.
• County budget restraints resulted in the inability to increase staff to meet the increasing workloads.
Page 5CALIFORNIA E-RECORDING SUMMIT
Implementing the Electronic Recording Delivery ActFebruary 2005 Sacramento, CA
• Many recorders saw a significant increase in the number of documents
00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04
Documents Recorded 492,293 671,000 860,496949,864
% increase over the previous year 36% 28%10%
Average Docs recorded per day 2001 2728 34983861
# of Examiners 10 10 10 15
# of Docs Per Examiner per day 200 273 344 257
* Based on a 246 day year
Page 6CALIFORNIA E-RECORDING SUMMIT
Implementing the Electronic Recording Delivery ActFebruary 2005 Sacramento, CA
Fiscal Years 01-04
35827
48427
38075
40452
39404
42646
30925
37823
43603
42699
47150
45262
63482
60128
44243
62289
43011
61530 52312 46607
59420
63874
59080
55124
66069 56855
58467
70814
60774
67301
68198
68635
73740
76516
78334
114793
85277
87503
87586
85245
61622
74399
77406
64287
80346
81741
77493
86959
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Month
FY 2000-01492,293
FY 2001-02671,100Increase of36%
FY 2002-03860,496Increase of28%
FY 2003-04949,864Increase of10%
Page 7CALIFORNIA E-RECORDING SUMMIT
Implementing the Electronic Recording Delivery ActFebruary 2005 Sacramento, CA
Reasonable Expectation For Examiners
Examiners need to examine and record documents with care and diligence. But…
–The Title Company clerk wrote everything manually, relating the recorded
instrument number to the order number, occasionally making errors.
–The examiner explains why documents were rejected to the Title Clerk or Service
Agent. By the time that information made it to the Title Company, it may be
incorrect, misunderstood or untimely resulting in phone calls to and from the Title
Company to explain the rejection and resolution again.
– Examiners worked overtime frequently to meet the requirements of the day.
– The Title Company clerk sat with the examiner and they became very chatty which could take away from timely recordings.
– A reasonable average of documents to be examined, recorded and cashiered is about 35 per hour on a 6.5 hour work day. Some examiners can examine more and some examine less.
– We must also consider vacations, sick leave, and just being tired.
Page 8CALIFORNIA E-RECORDING SUMMIT
Implementing the Electronic Recording Delivery ActFebruary 2005 Sacramento, CA
The Title Company Submission Process in 2002When Implementing E-Confirmation
One Examiner
and Title Company clerks arrives @ 7:00
Title Co. clerk submits
documents to Examiiner & signs in with how many
docs they are recording
Title Co. clerk is called in order of
sign in sheet. Sits with
Examiner while docs are being
recorded.
Examiner examines,
cashiers and sends e-mail
confirmations
Rejected
documents
Documents are indexed and verified for correctness
Cashier and Tile Co. clerk verify the document
count to ensure their were no
errors
Title Co. clerk calls each title
officer to confirm
confirmations
Recorder prepares docs for
scanning
Microfilm is
created
Cashier waits for
the Title Co. clerk
Cashier hand stamps each
document with the recording date and time
Cashier verbally gives Title Co.
clerk the document numbers
Examiner walks documents to be
recorded to cashier
Documents are
scanned
Paper document
is mailed out
Title Co. clerk matches each
document number to each order number
End
Title Co. Recorder
Page 9CALIFORNIA E-RECORDING SUMMIT
Implementing the Electronic Recording Delivery ActFebruary 2005 Sacramento, CA
The Title Company Submission Process in 2004 When Implementing E-Recording
Prepare recording log
Prepare document cover
sheets
Prepare documents for
scanning
Scan documents
Verify/Correct errors
Documents are indexed and verified for correctness
Send e-mail confirmations
Print face sheets
Recorder prepares docs for
scanning
Microfilm is
created
Documents are received from title company
Recording time
Examine document
Electronically submit to
Recorder’s Office
Documents are
scanned
End
Cashier/record/ reject documents
Recorder
Title Co.
Recorder
May or may not mail back paper
copy
Page 10CALIFORNIA E-RECORDING SUMMIT
Implementing the Electronic Recording Delivery ActFebruary 2005 Sacramento, CA
What are the costs of E-Recording?
Recorder Submitter
One – TimeSoftware development $103,000Hardware $ 8,000Larger monitors ($1,500.00 ea.) $ 22,500(Equivalent of 3.5 examiners for one year) $133,500
AnnualMaintenance $ 25,000
Less TangibleTraining (Operational staff time) $ 650
(Average of 24 hrs./title co.)Technical support/title company $ 400
(12 hrs. per title company)
Hardware $6,392Software $1,275Maintenance $1,043
OngoingMaintenance ?Postage $ .35/doc
Less TangibleTraining of operational end technical staff
Page 11CALIFORNIA E-RECORDING SUMMIT
Implementing the Electronic Recording Delivery ActFebruary 2005 Sacramento, CA
What are the savings?
Recorder Submitter
1. Ability to submit documents throughout the day.
2. Leveling of workflow (submissions, confirmations, closings, payoffs, release of funds).
3. Number of lost documents.
4. Documents can be corrected quickly and usually re-submitted the same day.
5. Happier customers.
6. Better utilization of staff.
7. Transportation costs for remote offices.
Less TangibleBetter utilization of staffIncreased productivity
Savings estimates
Postage - Per document $ .35Annual overtime $36,808
Annual cost of 1 document examiner $37,736
Page 12CALIFORNIA E-RECORDING SUMMIT
Implementing the Electronic Recording Delivery ActFebruary 2005 Sacramento, CA
For Any Questions or Comments please contact:
De Ana ThompsonChief Deputy Recorder ForLarry WalkerAuditor/Controller-Recorder of San Bernardino County(909) [email protected]