-
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY TOPICS
No. 7 April 2001 Human and Community Development UC Davis, CA
95616
California Community Topics, an occasional publication series of
the California Communities Program (CCP),provides useful
information to citizens and local leaders about important issues of
community governance,leadership, and economic development. The CCP
is a statewide unit of the University of California’s Divisionof
Agriculture and Natural Resources, with applied research and
outreach responsibilities. It is housed by theDepartment of Human
and Community Development, College of Agricultural and
Environmental Sciences, atUC Davis. David Campbell is director of
the CCP. He may be reached at (530) 754-4328; FAX 752-5855;E-Mail
[email protected].
This publication may be duplicated for distributionproviding
full CCP information at the top of this page is included.
Farm stays in Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and else-where in
the world have proven to be an effective meansof maintaining and
revitalizing rural areas. Their de-velopment has played a key role
in the increased eco-nomic viability of many small farms as well as
encour-aging landscape conservation. Countries with an estab-lished
farm stay network have a steady stream of visitorsupply and demand
as well as a large degree of supportfrom various tourist entities.
Although each country isdifferent, commonalities such as government
support,an infrastructure to facilitate reservations plus easy
ac-cess to sites help foster success. In general, a rural areaneeds
to have qualities that attract tourists such as natu-ral beauty,
cultural or other local activities, easy access,and basic
amenities. California is a state where naturalbeauty abounds,
agriculture is a major economic playerwith a rich history, and
accessibility is not a problem.We have the resources needed to
realize the potentialbenefits of farm stays, but farm stay tourism
in Califor-nia is very much in its infancy.
During research conducted in the summer of 2000, 16growers were
interviewed about their farm stay activi-ties. The interview
process consisted of 2 surveys (onefilled out by the farmer and the
other filled in by theinterviewer) and follow up questions. Most of
the in-terviews included a tour of the farm and the lodgings,which
helped in assessing the style and theme of thefarm stay, as well as
the targeted clientele. The samplebegan to form using connections
made through the State-wide Agriculture and Nature Tourism
Workgroup (or-ganized by the UCD Small Farm Center, and funded
bythe Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources).
Cultivating Farm Stays in CaliforniaJanet Momsen, Professor
Jill Donaldson, Research AssistantDepartment of Human and
Community Development
University of California, Davis
Using a snowball technique, we asked those interviewedfor
referrals. Additionally, various sites on the internetwere trawled
for information.
What is a Farm Stay?
In California, this is virtually an unknown term, and
ter-minology has proven to be somewhat problematic inthe study of
agricultural tourism. For clarification wewill refer to farm stays
as “using guest accommodationprovided on a small farm where the
primary enterpriseis agriculture.” In order to be included in this
study, thefarm had to conform with this definition.
Consequently,large-scale corporate farms and dude ranches were
notincluded in the sample. It should be noted however,that the
above definition is very general and that varia-tions used in
different countries and regions tend to bemuch more specific.
Terminology is discussed in moredepth below.
Potential Benefits of Farm Stays
There must be clear advantages of farm stays in orderfor this
type of tourism to gain widespread support.Concrete rewards are as
follows:
1. Low impact and direct interactions. Farm stay tour-ism is
small scale and dispersed thus minimizing theimpact of visitors on
the local community. The natureof the host/guest relationship
encourages the tourist notto act irresponsibly or be overly
belligerent as he or shewill have to answer directly to the owner
of the prop-erty. Furthermore, farmers choose when they accept
-
tourists and how many, often scaling back during theharvest or
at the time of family holidays. Finally, farmstays allow for direct
exchanges between the providerand the consumer, lessening the need
for middlemen withthe associated loss of potential income.
2. Diversification. Diversification of farm income helpsto
ensure a steadier cash flow, and to lessen the depen-dence upon
agricultural market price fluctuations. Ad-ditionally, this allows
the farm family to maximize theuse of the farm in terms of
outbuildings, landscape, andavailable labor. The increased
financial stability providedby a diversified income makes it less
likely that farmerswill feel the need to leave the land in search
of bettereconomic conditions.
3. Preservation of farmland and cultural heritage. Farmstays can
assist in the preservation of cultural heritageby helping to
discourage rural migration and by encour-aging farmers to continue
to use their land for produc-tion instead of selling it to
developers, especially if theyare located near an urban center. The
fact that localtraditions and a country way of life are seen as a
part ofthe tourist lure provides further incentive to retain
thosefeatures unique to each area.
4. Environmental conservation. Viewed as some of thebest
caretakers of the land, small farmers have the moti-vation to care
for its physical appearance and to lookafter the land’s overall
health in order to help keep theacreage viable and productive.
Again, the desire to at-tract tourists encourages farmers to
protect the rural land-scape.
5. Rural urban interaction. Farmers express a great in-terest in
educating their urban guests, realizing that it isin their best
interest to do so. By learning where theirfood comes from and
experiencing a rural way of life,the voting city dweller will
hopefully depart with a newappreciation and respect for food
systems, agriculturalissues, land concerns, and rural heritage.
Another sidebenefit of this communication is the tendency of
theurbanite to recognize the value of patronizing local pro-ducers
and purchasing what value-added food or craftitems might be
available. Finally, there are generallyenjoyable social exchanges
to be had on both sides.
Trends and Perspectives
Within the very broad specifications of Californian farmstays,
patterns have emerged. The following is a brief
overview of the data from the sample survey focusingon issues
surrounding terminology, marketing, and themain challenges to farm
stay tourism in California.
Characteristics of the sample group
The sample group consists of 5 ranches (cattle and tim-ber), 5
farms (apples, dairy, honey, ostrich, and almonds),and 6 wineries
(vineyards and wineries). Each of thegrowers has their own unique
attraction and target mar-ket, and there is a wide range in the
type of accommo-dations, price range, activities, and atmosphere.
It isuseful to make a distinction between wine-related farmstays
and all others when considering the data. The goalsof the two
groups differ somewhat, although both groupslisted additional
income, raising awareness, and demandfor their product as major
goals. Wineries were espe-cially keen to use farm stays as a
marketing technique.The farm and ranch category put much more
emphasison preservation of farmland, enhancement of sustain-able
farming practices, and especially educating thepublic.
Half of the 16 survey respondents consider themselvesto be Bed
& Breakfasts, and market themselves as such.In fact, most of
those interviewed did not consider them-selves “farm stays,”
largely because they were unfamil-iar with the concept and the
parameters of the term. Thisis an important point as it shows the
motivation to pro-vide accommodation, but within the already
establishedinstitution of Bed & Breakfasts. There are
numerousreasons for this, foremost being that the Bed &
Break-fast circuit is well known and it is a very popular
ac-commodation type in this state. The general publicknows how to
find them and what to expect upon ar-rival. Additionally, there are
a number of Bed & Break-fast associations offering support to
the provider. Infor-mation about virtually all aspects of owning
and operat-ing a Bed & Breakfast is readily available from
variousorganizations, and standards are well recognized for
theofficial seal of approval. Networking among Bed &Breakfast
establishments is very common also, withmany sharing ideas and
referring their overflow to oth-ers within their network.
Terminology and marketing
Currently in California, the parameters of farm stays arevery
wide as people are unfamiliar with the term andbecause no formal
standards exist. In essence, the maindifferences between farm stays
and Bed & Breakfast
-
inns are the amount of contact with the provider and
theopportunity to have a farm experience. A Farm StayBill, AB 1258,
successfully passed the State Assemblylast year. This allows farms
fitting the criteria to be sub-jected to less strict health and
safety regulations and toserve meals throughout the day, making it
a great dealeasier to attract people into secluded areas where
otherfood outlets and restaurants are not easily accessible.
Californians seem to be generally more amenable to theidea of a
rural holiday than that of a farm holiday. “Ru-ral” sounds more
active, and involving nature and theoutdoors, than “farm” which
sounds more like work,and perhaps not as adventurous. In comparison
to Eu-rope, Californians tend to have a much lower apprecia-tion of
the cultivated landscape. The more commonnotion of a rural holiday
being that of visiting a nationalor state park, camping, partaking
in sporting activities,or getting away to a secluded Bed &
Breakfast. Thelack of public knowledge about farm stays as a
viableholiday option has led to some creative and
successfulmarketing tactics on the part of the farmers.
Examples of nonagricultural ways farmers have enticedpeople to
stay on their farm include offering cookingclasses, hosting special
meals such as winemaker din-ners and pizza nights, running seasonal
hunting opera-tions, language schools, cattle drives, and
horsebackriding. Of course farmers capitalized on nearby
touristattractions such as wine tasting, the Gold Country,
birdwatching, and state or national parks. All of these meth-ods
have worked well for those utilizing them showingthat in order for
a farm stay to be successful, a numberof activities should be
available to keep the guests busy.Most of the growers interviewed,
many of whom havestrong repeat business, are fairly happy with
their vol-ume of tourists, with some operating at capacity.
Obstacles to the Development of Farm Stays
Clearly, the first and foremost difficulty is the generallack of
awareness and subsequent acceptance of farmstays as a tourism
genre. Ignorance on the part of thetourism industry and local
governments can pose a ma-jor barrier since frequently these are
the people whowould be expected to play a critical role in
advertising,setting trends, and raising public awareness.
Unlikecountries with an established farm stay tradition,
Cali-fornia offers scant governmental support in the form
ofsubsidies, informational workshops, etc. At the presenttime,
there is no central clearing house of information
for either the farmer or the tourist, and a comprehensivelist of
farm stays has yet to be compiled (although thisis currently
underway), making the dissemination ofinformation difficult.
It is common for farmers to show a less than enthusias-tic
reception to the whole idea of becoming a touristdestination. Many
are highly independent and privatepeople, and they understandably
are reluctant to beginproviding tourist accommodation in their
homes or ontheir property. They certainly are not overly
familiarwith the general concept of farm stays per se. Privacyand
family harmony are major issues in the decisionmaking process of
whether to set up farm stay facilities.
When a farmer has decided to begin farm stay tourism,he or she
is confronted with a number of challenges.The first likely concern
is obtaining information abouthow to start. There is little
start-up information avail-able in California right now, and this
is one of the rea-sons why many growers follow the Bed &
Breakfastmodel. Once the decision has been made to begin afarm
stay, the farmer must figure out how to navigatethe legal domain.
This can be exceedingly difficult orrelatively easy, depending on
their county of residenceand how personally astute they are in
these matters.Some other concerns include insurance and labor
issues,marketing, and community receptiveness.
Obtaining all the necessary permits and complying withlocal
regulations are most often the biggest roadblocksin getting things
started. Each county has its own zon-ing laws, planning
regulations, and health departmentand building codes, all of which
are both subordinate tostate laws and subject to change depending
on the po-litical climate (Fulton 1999). In counties with
Coop-erative Extension Advisors who are supportive of farm-ers and
tourism, establishing a farm stay is feasible. Thishas led to a
cluster-like development of farm stays bycounty. This cluster
development seems to be furtherencouraged by the existence of a
supportive commu-nity with an established tourist trade or a
network ofBed & Breakfasts. On the other hand in a county
likeNapa, which has taken an early role in managing tour-ism,
getting permission for farm stay facilities is muchmore
difficult.
The fact that many of the fundamental start up issuesare
regulated by individual counties makes it very diffi-cult to
generalize about the situation in California. Set-ting up statewide
networks is exceedingly challenging
-
when the conditions vary to such a high degree. This isa
severely limiting factor to the farm stay industry as awhole since
navigating the county regulations are prob-ably the biggest
obstacle, after the lack of public knowl-edge. However, one can be
optimistic. The bed & break-fast industry has had to deal with
many of the same bar-riers and it is clear that they are now an
extremely suc-cessful and vital component of tourism in
California.
Resources
Currently there are some new developments occurringwhich will
serve to spur the growth of farm stays. TheCABBI (California
Association of Bed and BreakfastInns) web site has created a new
category specificallyfor farm stays. This web site targets tourists
and shouldincrease awareness and help bring business to the
listedfarm stays. On the whole, more farmers are expressinginterest
in exploring farm stays as an option. In response,one particularly
proactive rancher, also involved in theAgricultural and Nature
Tourism Workgroup, has takenthe lead in supporting this trend by
communicating withCABBI and encouraging them in their formal
inclusionof farm stays. The rancher was involved with the
evo-lution of the AB 1258 bill, and put together an informa-tional
workshop aimed at farmers to help them throughthe start up process.
Others are sure to follow.There are ongoing research and
promotional effortswithin universities and among Cooperative
ExtensionAdvisors, mostly directed at agritourism as a whole,
butwhich also shed light specifically on farm stays. Thepreviously
mentioned Statewide Agriculture and NatureTourism Workgroup,
chaired by Desmond Jolly, direc-tor of the Small Farm Center, has
been successful in
The University of California prohibits discrimination against or
harassment of any person employed by or seeking employment with the
University on thebasis of race, color, national origin, religion,
sex, physical or mental disability, medical condition
(cancer-related), ancestry, marital status, age, sexual
orien-tation, citizenship, or status as a Vietnam-era veteran, or
special disabled veteran. The University of California is an
affirmative action/equal opportunityemployer. The University
undertakes affirmative action to ensure equal employment
opportunity for underutilized minorities and women, for persons
withdisabilities, and for Vietnam-era veterans, or special disabled
veterans. University policy is intended to be consistent with the
provisions of applicable stateand federal law. Inquiries regarding
this policy may be addressed to the Affirmative Action Director,
University of California, Agriculture and NaturalResources, 1111
Franklin Street, 6th Floor, Oakland, CA 94607-5200. (510)
987-0097.
bringing together a diverse group of participants rang-ing from
farmers to academics, and private consultantsto state and local
governmental representatives. Thisgroup continues to expand as word
of its existencespreads and has secured enough funding to sponsor
regu-lar conferences and meetings while conducting ongo-ing
research projects. The UC Davis Small Farm Cen-ter has a good deal
of helpful information and links onits web site. Also, Dr. Ellie
Rilla, Cooperative Exten-sion Director in Marin County, has been
instrumental inraising farm stay awareness.
In order to make farm stays a more viable method
ofdiversification for growers and a known tourist optionin
California, the above developments must be expanded.Educating
farmers about what exactly needs to be donein order to begin, as
well as making the public aware ofthe possibility of a farm stay
for future vacations, areboth necessary. Standardization of
terminology is a keyfactor as well, especially when dealing with
public per-ceptions and expectations. Organizations such as
FarmTrails, tourist publications, travel agents, and travelshows
have huge advertising potential and play a majorrole in public
opinion. Research efforts and informa-tion gathering must continue,
and most critically, thereis a need for clear and regular
communication betweenthe above mentioned stakeholders to create
increasedmomentum.
References
Fulton, William. 1999. Guide to California Planning.Solano Press
Books: Point Arena, CA.