CALENDAR ITEM - CA State Lands Commission Archivesarchives.slc.ca.gov/Meeting_Summaries/1989_Documents/09...CALENDAR ITEM A 7 17 09/27/89 s 1 W 24144 PRC 7346 J. LudlolAI APPLICANT:

CALENDAR ITEM

17 09/27/89 A 7

s 1

W 24144 PRC 7346 J. LudlolAI

APPLICANT:

APPROVAL OF A RECREATIONAL PIER PERMIT

Charlotte M. Angell and Robert W. Angell, Trustees 17 La Fond Lane Orinda, California, 94563

AREA, TYPE LAND AND LOCATION: A parcel of submerged land in Lake Tahoe near

LAND USE:

Cedar Point, Placer County.

Repair of decking and boathouse for an existing pier, extension of the existing pier and retention of two mooring buoys.

TSRMS OF PROPOSED PERMIT: Initial period: Five-years beginning

September 27, 1989.

CONSIDERATION. Rent-free, pursuant to Section 6503.5 of the P.R.C.

APPLICANT STATUS: Applicant is owner of upland.

PREREQUISITE CONDITIONS, FEES AND EXPENSES: Filing fee and processing costs have been received.

-1-

' ' ::c ' ..... . .. ) v •.!:,1.,,.J

CALENDAR ITEM NO. 17 (CONT'D)

STATUTORY AND OTHER REFERENCES:

AB 884:

A. P.R.C.: Div. 6, Parts 1 and 2; Div. 13.

B. Cal. Code Regs.: Title 2, Div. 3; Title 14, Div. 6.

12/21/89.

OTHER PERTINENT INFORMP.TION: 1. Pursuant to the Commission's delegation of

authority and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15025), the staff has prepared a Proposed Negative Declaration identified as EIR ND 485, State Clearinghouse No. 89073101. Such Proposed Negative Declaration was prepared and circulated for public review pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.

Based upon the Initial Study, the Proposed Negative Declaration, and the comments received in response thereto, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15074(b))

2. The existing pier, including the boathouse with boatlift, is located landward of the 6,223-foot low water mark. The extension will continue waterward of the low water mark onto the State's land.

3. Materials will be neither stored or placed, nor will any activity associated with construction, be constructed above the low water line on the subject property. This will prevent any disturbance to what may be considered a Tahoe Yellow Cress (Rorippa) habitat.

4. In order to determine the other potential trust uses in the area of the proposed project, the staff contacted representatives of the following agencies: Tahoe Regional Planning Association, California Department of Fish and Game, County of Placer, and the

-2-

CAl.ENDAa PAGE


Tahoe Conservancy. None of these agencies expressed a concern that the proposed project would have a significant effect on trust uses in the area. The agencies did not identify any trust needs which were not being met by existing facilities in the area. Idantified trust uses in this area would include swimming, boating, walking along the beach, and views of the lake.

5. This activity involves lands identified as possessing significant environmental values pursuant to P.R.C. 6370, et seq. Based upon the staff's consultation with the persons nominating such lands and through the CEQA review process, it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is consistent with its use classification.

6. All permits covering structures in Lake Tahoe will include a condition subsequent that if any structure authorized is found to be in nonr.onformance with the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency's shorezone ~rdinance, and if any alteration~. repairs, or removal required pursuant to said ordinance are not accomplished within the designated time period, then the permit will be automatically terminated, effective upon notice by the State, and the site shall be cleared pursuant to the terms thereof.

7. All permits issued at Lake Tahoe include special language in which the permittee/lessee agrees to protect and replace or restore, if required, the habitat of Rorippa subumbellata, commonly called the Tahoe Yellow Cress, a State-listed endangered plant species.

APPROVALS OBTAINED: Placer County, Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, California Department of Fish and Game, Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board, and United States Army Corps of Engineers (GP016}.

-3-

169 f:~CNf).'u1 PAGE

3 ,~ 0 ,J r.::~1:.m ?,,! .• ::::CE::_· --==~ ... :::· ='~=·=·==.i , __ _


FURTHER APPROVALS REQUIRED: None.

EXHIBITS: A. Land Description. B. Location Map. C. Placer County Letter of Approval. D. Negative Declaration.

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE COMMISSION:

1. CERTIFY THAT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION, EIR ND 485, STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 89071301, WAS PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE CEQA AND THAT THE COMMISSION HAS REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED THE INFORMATION CONTAINED THEREIN.

2. DETERMINE THAT THE PROJECT, AS APPROVED, WILL NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT.

3. AUTHORIZE ISSUANCE TO CHARLOTTE M. ANGELL AND ROBERT W. ANGELL, TRUSTEES, OF A FIVE-YEAR RECREATIONAL PIER PERMIT, BEGINNING SEPTEMBER 27, 1989; FOR THE USE AND MAINTENANCE OF AN EXISTING PIER, BOATHOUSE AND BOATLIFT, .REPAIR OF DECKING AND BOATHOUSE ON nN EXISTING PIER, EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING PIER, ANO FOR THE RETENTION OF TWO EXISTING MOORING BUOYS, ON THE LAND DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT 11 A11

ATTACHED ANO BY REFERENCE' MADE A PART HEREOF.

-4-·-

I /~f1!577;\/G ~G-

T@-• .w----@' .euk7Yt'~ .. ), \

!t= tt\ ~ 7?v-f~ EXHIBIT "A" ~ ~ ~~

LAND DESCRIPTIO ~ t w 24144 ~ ~-

r--7.J ·fr I 'iJ I ~' ! ; '~ if __ _.L

I I

-1 I

~ I I

... i I , .. ~ I I ~~

I' I I ~,-1 I '

C _-1 I ~

~ !;'* ~ ! I LJ

a:;1:f:W ,,e_ ~I± I~ !'i:-7~1..f:'n:?~ ~'..e1Z?~

--~INGP~~ dl?J-~~ ;z-~--11

"• ... . .. . ... ,• :.· .. . !\: ... ')

. :·: 1\ ~···-:t

·:· ~

REVISED

&f/ar

LOCATION MAP

Prepared by Judy Ludlow

~ N

lLJ lLJ \0 ,.....

er er

T !6 N

111 lJ J \0 ,....

er: er:

Sunnyside

TISN _,, ... ________ ., Horr.awood

lLJ UJ IO ,..._

EXHIBIT 'B' er: a:

w 24144

Lake Forest

\

T14N

T 13 N

.,. 11 I ,_ U)

a·

Tahoe Vista

II l!1 I II II I I l!I II I I

LAKE: II a

TA H O:E

Placer County - - .... - -El Dorado County

Ill 111 ,... en

(I" (I

II I If a I

-a a I G n I i n &I m

a~ ~~

<tt~ ~ ...

T 12 N

OPERATIHG OC'llSION: 14,..-....... ~ ~~ ROid~

5'>«>11 Ooslnas s.....,.r.o T11•-talio1

Judy Ludlow

PLACER COUNTY

California State Lands Commission 1807 - 13th Street Sacramento, CA 95814

RE: PIER - SHOREZONE CONSTRUCTION

EXHIBIT "C"

w 24144

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

JACK WARREN, Dir~:tor JAN WITTER, Assistant Director LARRY ODDO. Deputy Director

ALAN ROY, Deputy Director

Ma t' ch 3 , 1 9 8 9

The County of Plac~t' has reviewed the below referenced requests for construction ac~!vities within the Shorezone oi Lake Tahce. We have no objection to the construction activities described in the below applications contingent upon approval by your office.

1. E.S. Bertagnolli PRC 3209.9 2. Charlotte and Rabert Angell w 24144 3. Sweet/Avanessi~n PRC 5022 4. Uickland PRC 3599 5. Lyons/Hawkins WP 5884 6. Mein - 83-162-28 PRC 6714 1. Mein - 83-162-31 w 24134 a. McFarland PRC 3659 9. Gibb WP 3652 10. Crabtree w 21445 11. English w 1124.38 12. Wallis PRC 4314 13. Metas w 24103 14. Barrow PRC 7167.9 15,, Nahas PRC 4066 16. Hi c kc y 21665

Should you have any questions or if I. can be of further assistance, please call at your convenience.

COUNTY OF PLACER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC JACK WARREN, DIRECTO ~---

•" ., I t' • ~- c: ~·1····

........ -

11444BAvenut I DaW1t!Ccnt01 I Aubum.Callfomta95603 I (915)~11

STATE OF CALIFORNIA-STATE LANDS COMMISSION

STATE LANDS COMMISSION 1807 13TH STREET SACF1AMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814

PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

Project Title: Angell pie~ repair/extension

Project Propo11ent: Robert and Charlotte Angell

Project Location: 126o ~est Ls.ke Blvd., Sunnyside, Lake Tehoe

EXHIBIT "D"

EIR ND 485

File Ref.: W 24144

SCHD: 89073101

Project Description: Repair and 270 LF extension of an existing pier with 10.7.7" diameter

steel pile~ at 1.5' c.c .. 611 steel "Ji!' beatr.s, 4" x 10" wood joists at 2411 o.co

Project also includes proposed authoriznticn of existing boathouse and two (2)

mooring buoys.

Contact Person:Judy Brown Telephone: (916) 32h-4715

.... ._ ... -

This document is prepared pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (Section 21000 et seq., Public Resources Code), the State CEQA Guidelines (Section 15000 et seq., Title 14. California Code Regulations}, and the State Lands Conmission regulations (Section 2901 et seq., Title 2, California Code Regulations).

Based upon the attached Initial Study, it has been found that:

1!l]" the project will not have a significant effect on the environment.

t::J" mitigation measures included in the project will avoid potentially significant ef s •

. , . . ~:-;;::.-;~)'' ~ · 1 7 4 1 , ..... , ........ 0-:.C"),• j J ~·~'·::r': ...:."""C t) llJ. ._, •c.}

I"•••'••• ·------·- .... , ... . ______ .... _ _,.......,,""

.... J _lll._,._,_a90 __ .,,_10_1 __ J 1• 1.,..,,,..., 'lltl• _....;.;.An....;g:::..e...;l;;..;l;....;.P_i_c_r_B_.;ep:..a;_i_· r...:./_Ex_t_e_n_s_io_n _____________________ _

2. i.-11 A&l'M'J" Stnte Lands Commission Judy Brown

8 5,,_, Aaarc.._'q 18C? nth Street :Sb. Cl\) .. ___ ~....!;S~n!!:c~r~;!1::r.'l~e:.!.n!!t;.:,o~-~~~::----3c. OAint1 : Sacramento 312 • Zip: 9.581'• :s.,. fboM:._<...,9_1_6_)_3_2_4...,,-_4_7_15 __ _

RnJIC'I' lllCaT10l c. 0iw1tr: Plac:..:e~r~----·---~ '"· cur~u1: __ s_u_n_r._y_s_i_d_e _______ ,-------cti. ~·s Pt..rul "°• S3-2o""'2-05 41!. ~um..._ ... l .... B--.. ___ 'IWJ>. _ _.l ... S_...IJ _____ IWl~,,_lt-'!7...t..:E=----

for ftunl, tc.Ntlt CczmM111r:_, _______________ _ ~. ~ s1rw1a: \\est Lake Blvd. o::i.

. Seate 89 Al,... ~'•I l• luer-1. tnt.1110 2 auu. •· ~, b. pone e. "'" d. •rs Lake Tahce

-----------~ ~----------- ------------

01. _t1JJ>

Cl:!. _Elt.rlr OJna 01. _KJC

m • .){",,..·Otte oa. _JUJ

04. _Orr.It tlR

!l.lpplCSll!Dt/ m. ~wottlR (J'r1m:-3oi ~.:

O. _'l'CliSI

Draft 11. _tJS

12. _tA

13. ......;.JC!l.l>t.;: "1C\ce lit

H. _Flml :i)oi::\&rot

1~•---0t.bCI'~~--~~---JO. '!t7Ut. Mltl!9:

0. ux:.u. tt:1'10. ftJ'B

01. ,_GeMr&l Plll.D OpSU11

02. _'°""9 u-nt 03. _Gwooral P!u AmCIURot

~. -~t.1' li'1>D

CO, _AAMIAUOll

cs. .:.:__ srm:u s c P~ :s.o

ffl. -~'1 Plu

oa. -~velor=ot cs._~

10. LaJ>d DlYiSlOD ~1Vlsloc, hl"Clll tap, Tnct Map, ·etc.)

l:Z. _l'ast~ lt&ct Pl!U>

13. _r.iioul Al "~•rve

14. __ 0Uier __ ~-~---

Ol. _llnld110Ual• 011n11. ____ Acna ___ _

02. _ottace: Sq.''··----------Acree _ Or;>loy"•-. ____ _

o:i. _SboSlP1.11g1c-n:1ai: Sq. ' '·-----Acrn ______ D:lploy11es.._ ____ _

l"i. _IDC!uat1'1al: Sq. fi., ______ _

N:rn. ______ D:;lloy"•·------

~. _e.ier l'ac1Unn: .co. ________ _

os. _'tnC1.~ru.uco: TJpe:, ______ _

01. _m111oa:: !UoeTal. _________ _

oa. _P:1Ir:':': 'bPt _____ 1'atts~----

{D. _ea.au TN:at.meot: ~-----·----10. _or::s J\eLUcd

u. _OUitr:

12. · Rnm:T fSSOBS DJsm.!32D !l'I DClCD1"M

l 1. TO?A.\. JICm Ol2:Al'fD.

1s. _Se?uc Sy11uam •

111 • . _SftRr Oapa:ltit

17. _Social

:ti • ..){ Vater Q\1:41Ut

01. _AtstheUc/Yl~l

02. __ ABTlcul!UTal L&.l'd

03, _A11' Q\lllUJ

a.. _AraaAOlo,1.:iil/\Uotortcal

()6, _ Coarztal f.cclll

os. _ &on.z:sc

ca. _'1cod•t11/Dnlll&le

co. _eeo1oe1c/Se1msc

10. _Jotis/HausU:a Bal&zice

U. _Hscienlr.

12. XN:J•~ J:I, _Put>Uc Sel"\JJCK

m. _r1re lluard 14. _School•

ia. _Sou tras!oo

:t. _&Ud tfut~

20. _Tc:?.Sc/Ha=rdc:us

21. _Tr.ftJ.::tcsrculusm

a2. _V('CS~t&UOD

:z..s. 11ucr S11s:-Plr

~. X'11etl~l!Upar110 26. _lflldUtcr

27. _Grvuth loduclDS

:a. _!llCCl;plt1blcr lAad~

29. _C\m.ilat>~ E.flteta

:ao. _Other ______ _

13. ~ laflPf'OI) Flldl'nl s. ___________ '"te ··---------- Tot.-1 s __________ _ 14. ~ LMD ll!:R N>D mrr.c;;:

15. mnncr ~ll"tim·

Repnir and 270 l:~' extension of an existing pie:· with 10.7511 diameter ste1~l piles at 15 1 O.C. 611 steel ''H" beams, 411x 10" wood joists at 21111 u.c., 2" x 6" min. ccdnr deck, with cntwalk. Pro~ect a~~~ ;riEJ,~ges profooed

1 authorization of cxisti?ig boat hot.De nnd ho ( 2) mooring buo~s .... .,, .• , p·~i: 7 5 1 ' ... :-..... \ ... ,, ,..'--.. ~,, ,,-rr-• ; .... ,.,.:: p.•:"t J ~ ~ '...t -

11.. s11;,umH11 ,,, '""'' ir.rn:<r '"inx:um~n: ~~ ~: ~J:~ d 1 ":::f1=-·~ NIT\ ':••11u ...... ,.,. •t•t 0'''1t• '. • • ' •· •••••••••• t

. . -STATE LANDS '-..!~.iMISSION

.. - . -~

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM -.Part I (To~ completed by epplicant) FORM 69.3(11/Sll

A. GENERAL INFORMATION

1. Name, address, and telephone number:

L Applicant

17 La Fond La:"e

Orinda, CA 94563

,tns 254-58ll2

.. Date Filed:____..f. __ ..,, __

File Ref.: __ W.-..::2.:.4..:.14.,ll._ __

b. Contact person if other than applicant: Kevin M. Agan - Agent B.!,~mond Vail & Associates

P_. O. Box 879

Tahoe City, CA 95730

( 916 ! !>83-3417

2. a. Project location: (Please reference to nearest town or community and include countv)

In lake Tahoe adjacent to 1260_West Lake Blvd. & ---·--------______ ___,_, southwesterly of Tahoe City, Placer County

b. Assessor's parcel number: ___ ... a ... 3_-,..2_0.;:.2-_o""'s:::o-----------------------

3. Existing zcning of project site:------------------------------. - . .. . ....... . . -4. El<isting land use of project site: ___ E...,x._..ls ... t-.ln__.g_.e...,..le-.r....-.a.-n ... d-.b=oa.-.t-h...;o::.:u_s;..;e::.....:w"'"l~t-..h-.t::..w:.:;o:::-:Co..i21..11l...um~oo=-r~ln~g~b~ujd;ow.y~s--

6. Proposed use oi site: ___ P_ie_r_· _r ... e._e ... a...,lr_a_n ... d_..e._x...,t..,,en ....... s ... io ... n.._ __ , _________________ _ .. -

6. Other permits required: ____ T._a_h_o_e.,._,B ... eg..._.._,jo .... n...,a...,l_.P,_l.,.a ... n .... n ... i ... n.g,_..A~g~e ... a .... c.,)!._P ..... lau.coOIOew..r_.;i,,,C""ou.uu.nut.;y;_,, ______ _

B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

1. For building ccnstruction proJects, complete "ATTACHMENT A".

2. for non·building construction projects: Describe fully, the proposed activity, Its purpose and intended use, t.g. for pr~posed mineral prospecting permits, include the number of test holM, size o~ holes, amount of material to be excavated, maximvm surface 1rea of disturbance, hCi.e locations, depth of holes, etc. Atuch plans or othGr drawings n.~~:,.. ~-

!Ct\~ ... • ..... P .. .:E

! •·--:i-1.·i: :-·~c ............. -

C. ENVIRONME;~TAL SETTING

1. Describe tt'.e project site as it exists before the project. Including Information on topography. soil stability. plcnts and 1nimal1, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on tht site. and tho uso of the structures.

2. Describe thl' surrounding properties. Including Information on planu and .::n!mals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of llmd use (one·family. apanmant houses, shops, depart· ment itores, etc.), and s.c1le of development (height, frontage, set·back. roar yard, otc.).

D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Answer the following queitions by placing 1 check In the appropriate box. Discuss all hems chei:ktd "ves'* or "maybe••. (Attach addition;! sheets as necessary) ·

Will the project involve: YES MAYBE NO

1. a change in existing faatures of 1ny bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes, or hills. or iutntantial alteraticn •••••••• of ground contours? 0

2. a change in scenic views or vistu from existing residential areas or public lands or roads? • , ••••••••••••• 0 3. 1 chan~ in pattern, scale. or char!Cter of the g&neral area of project? •• , ••••••••••••••••••••••••• n 4. a significant effeet on plant er animal life? •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• , ••••• , •••••

5. signific:int iunounu of solid waste or litt•r7 ••••• , ••••• , ••••••• , •••••••••• , • , ••• , •• , •• , ••

6. a change fn dust. tih, smoke, fumes, or odors In the vicinity?. , •••••••••••••• , ••• , ••••• , •••••••

7. a change in ocean, bay, liiko, StrHm, or ground water quality or.quantity, o: alteration ••• , , ••••• , , • , •• of existing draimge patterni?

8. a change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinitv7 •• , ••••••••••• , •• , , , , ••••• , , •• , ••••

9. construction on filled land or on slope of 10.J)8rcent ct more? ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• . .. . ... . . ..

10. use or dis!X»lll of potentially hazardous material$, S\lch as toxic or radicactlv• •• , ••••••••• , ••••••••• substances. flammables, or explosives?

11. a change in demand for municipal services fpollce. firo, water. sewa11S. otc.J? • , •• , , ••••••••• , •• , ••••

12. an increase in follis fuel comumption (electricity, oil, natural ~s. tte.)1 •••••••••••••••••• , •• , , •••

13. a larger proj~t et a s~rles of projects? ••••• , •••••••• , •• , , •••••••••••••••••••••• , ••• , •••

E. CERTIFICATION

0

0

0

D

D

D 0

0 0

0

0 ~

0 ~ [J l8l 0 IX1 0 ~

0 00

D~

o~

om o rn

0 r!i 0 ~

0 [!9

I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and In tho atfUtlod exhibits pttstnt tho data and lnfCfmatlon ro· quired for this initial ovaluation to the but of m•1ability,1nd thot tho fKU, stattmanu, Md Information preunted are true 4lld correct to the ~st of my knowledQI! and belief.

Date: __________________ _

. •

I··~~::· .. , ~·~E ., I 7 .. , ...~-· ...... , r1~... __ .. ..,,___

I '"' A ~ • ' I 1 .... ,~. ~-:: ,. • 9'': J ':l 0 (•J ~ ..... l.- ......... ---····· ",, __ .. .-........ ., .. ~ .......

. STATE I.ANOS COMMISSION

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMErff CHECKLIST -PART 11 Form 13.20 (7/82J

I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION

A. Applicant: Robert and Charlotte Angell

17 La For.d Lane

Orinda, CA 94563

B. Cht .. list Date: .!3? 126 / 89

File Ref.: W 24144 •

c. r.ontact '~rson:_J_u_d_y_B_r_o_wn_~------------------------------Telephone: (916 ) 324-4715

o. Purpose: Existing pier repair/extension

E. Location: 1200 \•est Lake Blvcl., Sunnyside, Placer County

F. Description: Repair and '2:10 LF extension cf an existing pier 1t:ith 10. 75" diar::eter

steel piles at 15' o.c. 611 steel 111111 be!ms, 4•• x 1011 wco~ joists at 24" ~.c., ~·

2" x f..11 rein. cedar deck, with catwalk. of _a;: _,!?1ClSti!!g_ ~~~t1_l2!Js_e2nd G. Persons Contacted: _________________________________ ,

Tedd Car~ (?C2} 588-4547 Tahoe Rcgicnal Planning Agency

11. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS. (Explain all "yes" and "maybe" ansWf!rs}

A. Eurtlt. Will the pr<>;>osal result in:

1. Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic sulxtructura? ..•.•.••••••....••••••••..•.••

2. Oisr,. =ons, displacements, compaction, or overcovering of the soil? ..••.•.•...•..••.•.••..•..•

'OC!raphy or ground surf< ce relief features? .••.•.•..••••••• , .••• : ••••••.•••..•

of. fhe ~.,,.,;.,!!,or modificc tion of any unique geologic or physical features? • , ••••• , •.••••

5. Any in.:re.:a. ,_ .~·~ ... _ ,J\:!r erosion of soils, either on or off the site? •••••••.•••••••••••• , •••• .

Yes Maybe No

D 0 ~.l 0 D lil D D DO

6. Changes in depasition M ~os1on of beach sands. or c:hanges in siltation, deposition or e7os1on which may 'f:1 ~. modify tt-.~ channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay. inlet, or lakft1':·.: :-;-.-;-:-;-:-. , · J

! 1',"',~r::· ."'1 .\~3~ -7. Exposure o_f ~II people or property to geologic ha1ards 1uch as earthquakes, londsltdfl!i.!!.'~'N!~· ground ;:;g' ~ J~,' £t

failure, or s1m1lar hazards? .•....••...•.••....•.•• · • • ..•.•••••••••• I . , , . · ... ~ ...... - · · · - -....... ··-------- -·~~ . "''"'

8. : :lir. Will the proposal result 1n: Yes M.vybe No

1. SuhUant1dl air cmm1~s1u11i. 01 dcte11ura11011 of ambient 1111 qu.ility'. . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • [J I J lx I 2. The creation of objectionable odors?. • .. • .. • • ... • • . • . .. • . .. • • • • .. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • (] l: I f x I

41 3. Alter;shon of air movement. moisture or temperature, or any change in ch mate, either locally or regionally?. ( "] I J IX i C. lfut,•r. Will the propos;il result 1n:

1. Changl'!s in the currents, or the course or direction of water movements, 1n either marine or fresh waters? •• lJ I I I.x ii

2. Changt>S IO abso1pt1on rates. dra1nagP Jliltterm, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?. • • • • • • • • I ·1 I I r x ! 3. Alterations to the course 01 flow of flood waters' • • • • . . . .•..•••.•••••••••• : •••••••••••• J, .] I I Ix ·1

4. Chan~ in the 1moun1 of surface water in any Wilter body? ...••••• , • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • [ '] I . , IX l 5. 01sch;irqe mto surface? .vaters. or in any ~Iteration of uirface water quality, induding but not limited to

ll!mperilturr.. diuolvrd c xygcn 01 turbidity?. . . . • . . . . . ..••••••••••••••...••••••••••

G. Aiteri1t1011 of the direct on or ratf d flow of 9round w.iters' ..

7. Ch;,n!ll= Ill thr. quantity of ground w41tcrs. either thro11yh direct add1t1ons or withdrawals. or through rnter c1:µl1011 uf dll &KJu1h:r by cuh 01 e>ir.avations' . . . . . . . . .....•••..•.• ~ .••.••••.•.•.••.

8. Sub~tauhcll rieduc11on m the 11rnuu111 ul Wdh:H u1h1:1w1i.c o1vJ1io1uh: fur µul1hc water supplies? .•••.•.••..

9. l:x11usu11! of peoplie 01 property 10 water·relateu hdZards such as lloodln; or tidal waves? ••.•••••.••..

10 S1gmlicant c::hilnQf'~ in the tP.mperature. ilow 01 r:hem1cill conten: ot surface the;rnal sprrnQS? •.•••..•...

0. /1/1m1 I itr" Will the 1no1>0SJl 1P,ult rn:

1. Chanqe 111 the clivcu1ty of )Jlec1es. or number of any spec•~ of 11lants (including trees. shrubs, grass, crops. ilnd aquatn: plallts>? ••.•..••••..••••••...••••.••••.•••••••••••••• : •••••••••••..

2. Red11ct1u:1 of the num~·r' ol any unique, rare or endar.gerect species of plants? •••••••••••••••••••.

3. Introduction of new species of plants rnto ari area, or m a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing . ) ~pec1es ..••••...••••.••.•.••..••••••••..•..•.••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • · • • • • • · • ·

4. Reduction tn acrellge of any agricultural crop? .•.•••••••..••••.•.••••••••••••••••••••••

E. :l11i1111JI l.i/C- Will the proposal result in:

1 .. Chanyl! 111 the d1vers1ty of species. or numbers of any .species of animals (birds. land .animals.including reptiles, frsh and shellfish, benthic oryanisms. or insects)? .................................. .

2. Fleduction of the numb.irs of any unique. rare or-.e.,~~'1"l;:red.spcc1~ of ttnimals? .•.••.•••••• ~ ••••••

3, Introduction of new sp.icres of animals rnto an area, or result in a barrier to the mrgratron or movement of anim<ils? .•••••••••.•••••.•••••••..••••••••••••••.••..••••.••••••••••••••••

4. Deterioration to existin11 fish or wildlife habitat?._. .••.••.• , •.•••••••••••••••.••••••••.•••

F. Nui\t', W1il thP propm;il rr~ult Ill:

LI l><l

[I 1·1 r I

I I I. I

l - ' • I

I• I

i. J I . I .. I I I

! I I ! l

LI !X!

( ] I I. i I

IJ ·! I ' . , I I. I

I I "XI I I

ix. I :

!X' I

jx; IX· I I

jx;

I· I ·x· ! I

jxj

I?' I fxl

IJ I I !xi rJ rx1 1. 1

1. lncre3sc rn existing noisi? levels?. • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • . • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • l_j lx I i . I 2. Exposure of people to S!!vere norse levt?ls? . . . • . . • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • fJ l_ I (xi

G. I.ix/it am/ Ci/1m. Will the proposal result m:

1. The production of new light or glarl!? ..••.....••. , , •••••.••.•••••••.•••••••••••••••• D [··.1 Ix! H. I.uni/(.~"'· Will the propas;il result in:

t. A substantral altl!ration of the present 01 pla11111?1l land use cf an area?. • . • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • . • • • [ 1 (. j XI I. h'u111ru/ ll1•11111rc·,•:.. Will the proposal result rn:

8 1. Increase rn the rate of use of ~ny natural resources? ..•••.••••••••••••••••••••••• , • • • • • • • • [] f.. J Lx I 2. Substi'lnt1al de11lct1on of any nonrenewable rasources? ••••••.•••••.•••••••••.•••••• •• • • • • • • n I . ,

. #

2.

. . J. RM. 11J I 'I"'''· Drn•\ the J11e>puso1I result in:

1. A risk of an C?•PIMion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticidin, chr.m1cals, or rad11t1on) in the event of an tccident or upset conditions? ••••••••••••••••••••••••

2. Possibfo interf~rence with emergency response plan or an tmergency evacuation plan? • , •••• , , •••••••

K. Pn1111/u1i11n. Will the proposal result in:

l. The alteration, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population 9f the area? •••••••••• ! •

L. l/1111)in~. Will the pruposal result in:

1. Affecting existing housing, or create a demand for ~ditional housing? •••••••••••••••••••••••••

M. ?iul/.\p11r1ntiun/C:ircv/atinn. Will the proposal result in:

1. Generation of sub~'antial additional vehicular movement? ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

2. Affcr:tiny existing parking facilities, or create a demand for new parking? ••••••••••••••••••••••••

3. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems?. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • ••••

4. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? ••••••••••.•.•••

5. Alterations to waterborne, rail, or air traffic? ••••••••••••••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••.

6. lncri•ase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicycli5ts, or pedcstriaM7 •••••••••••.•••••••••••.•

N. P11'1/1r ,.;,.,..,,.,.). Will du: propusill have an effect upon, or r~lt in a need for new or altered governmental set vices in any of the following areas:

1. Fire protection> ...•....••.•...••.•.•••••••..••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••••.

2. Police protection? . : ......••.•••..•...•.••••.••••••• ,. ••••••••••••••••••.••••••

3. Schools? . . . . . . . . . . ...•.........•..........•••••••••..••.....•........•.•.

4. P.uks and other recreational facilities? ••••••••••••••••••••••••• , •••••••••••••••••••••

5. MaintPnance of public facilities, including roads? •.••••••..•••••••••••••••••• , •••••••••••

6. Clrhu governmental services? ....•.••••

0. l:i1rrl(1'. Will :he proposal result in:

DD

DD

DD DD DD DD OD LJ [J

1. Use ot substanti~I amounts of fuel or energy? ••••••••••••••••••••••• ·~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 D 2. SuL~ta111ial increase m demand upbn e:usting tOw:tlf~of elfergy, or rQQuire tho development of new sources? • 0 0

P. · U11lt1it'.t. Will the proposal result m a need for new 1ystems, or subnant1al alterations to the following utilities:

1. Power er natural gas 1 . ...•.. , •...•..••.•..•••..•.••••••.•..••••.•••. , ••••••.•.• . 2. Communication systems? ....... ·~• •..•••. · ....•..•..•.••....••.••••••..••••...•..

3. Wate!'7 . ...•. ~ ..• , .......•••.•.•••••..••..••••••.••••••.••••.••••••••••••••

4. $G\ver or !eptic tanks? ... ,,, ..........•....•........••.•.•••••••.•..•.•.••...•.•.

5. Storm water drainage? ... , .......•.•••.•....... " . "• •.••..••••••.•••••.•.••••..••

6. Solid waste znd disposal? .•••••••••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• , •

0. Human /lt'a/tll. Will the proposal result in:

DD DD DO DD DD DD

1. C1eat1un of anv health hamd or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 D 2. Exposure of pecple to potenti~I health hczards7 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0

R. ,fr,1/irtir.\. Will the proposal result in:

1. 're ohs1ruct1on ,of any scenic vu ta or view open to the public, or will tho propoSlll result in the creation of a~1 al!sthet1cally offensive site open to public view? ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

S. Rrrm11i1111. Will the propasa\reiult in: ,.~--~·- _ 1 ~ :1 1. An imJldCI UPO)'I the quality or quantity of oxisting ff)Cfi:ltiontil opponunitle$? ••• :.-: .. ~· •••• • .. :;E. .............. mJ l

J ... , ... :: . :·: _ Jti~-~ ... I . ... --··-· ... ·-··-· . ., ......... '

x

x

x

~ x

. . T. li1/1urul Rc•w11~J. Yes Maybe No

1. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological site?. 0 [] {x.J &· 2. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, D r-) IX_ J 'W structure, or object? ••.••..••••••••••••••••.•••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • L

3. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ...•••..••••••.••••..•• ~ .•..••••••.•••.••••••••••••••••.•••••••••••

4. Will the pro~al restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? •.•••••••.••

U. Mantlatt1T)' Fi11dit.~ of Sir.ni/kanrt.

1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the qudlity of the environment, reduce the habitat of a fish or w1ldhfe species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community. reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? .•......

2. Does the proiect have the potential to achieve short term. to the cJ1sad11antage of long·term, environmental goals? ......••••.•••........•.•••••....• · .•. · · · • • · · • · • • • · · • • • • • · • • • · · • • · • •

3. Does the proiect have impacts which are individually !imited, bul cumulativelv considerable? . . • . . • . ••

4. Does the pro1ect have environmental effects which will cause substantial adv~rse effects on t1uman beings, either directly or indirectly? •.....••.•....•••.....•.•.••........•.••..••..•••.• • •

Ill. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (See Comments Att<tehl!d)

LJ 1..1 IXJ D LI 01

D r·1 Iii

D D l~ D Cl~

DD (gJ

C5 - There could be a slight rise in the turbidity level during the construction ho~ever, compliance with water quality control requirements shculd keep this impact to a minimum.

D2 - Lake Tahoe is a known habitat for _Rorippa ~~bellata, listed by California as an endangered species. This project, however, will only disturb lands continuAlly flooded and not land above the shoreline.

E4 - The site is mapped by TRPA as fish habitat. The project cculd disturb fish habitat as a result nf construction and pier installation. The project site has been.inspected by 'i'RPA staff and found to be located in a sanrly bottom area. Sandy bottoms are not considered fish habitat at Lake Tahoe.

F1 - There could be e rise in the ambient noise levels during const-niction. ·This shoule be of relatively short~term"du~ation. '

The proposed project will only cauae disturbance to the bed of Lake Tahoe in a liciited area. Issues identified on ~:1is checklist by a ttno11 check are not affected by any aspect of this project.

IV. PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION

On the hasis of this initial evaluation:

[~ 1 find the proposed proiect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will

J be prepared.

[-} 1 find th<>t a11no11gh the nroposed pro1ect could have a sign1f1cant effect on the environment, there will not he a significant effect - m this case 1>ecause ~::f! m1t19at1on rneasures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE

DECLARATION will be prepared.

I ] I fmcJ the proposed pro1er.t MAY have a s1gn1f1cant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is requ1r.d,

Date: 0 11 {J., 1 /. fr 1 . • . I I Jl~. fl..~~ ._J 6.LJ

r ~~aty ands ~'!!~,?'~o·n ·-~~ _.,__;: ;ll~~=:.J \ . l"orm 13.20 (7/921

'

REVISED

. . . '!.··

....... 111mmi.-oe;;;o.21i!l!:~w ' c..~ ,, ... ::zppl

. •

W.O. '712&.31H ·.:suly 19, 1989

RE: PRO.TECT NARRATIVE/CONSTRUCTION METHOD PIER !U?PAIR/!Dt'l'ENSION - ANOKLL PftOPSftTY PLACER COtmTY APHs 83-202-05

PRO.TEC~ NARRATIVE

Repair and 270 LF extension of an ex.is ting pier io to be with 10.75" diameter steel piles at 15' o.c. 6" steel "H" beams, 4" x 10" wood joists at 24." o.c., 2" x 6" min. cedar deck, with catwalk. (See submittal drawing.)

CONSTRUCTION METHOD

Repair and extension of existing pier is to be by barge; with pile driver: .cassions or sleeve will be used when sediment is resuspended while pile driving. Anchorage ot barge will be to existing structure and/or anchors required for adequate stabilization of barge on the lake. All const~uction wastes wilJ be collected onto barge and disposed at the nearest

. dumpster/sanitary landfill·· s:tte. •· Small boats (John ·Boats) and tarps to be under constJ."uction areas to provide collection of

· construction debris preventing any discharge of wastes to the lake •

. •