CAADP 10 YEARS ON: DIALOGUE TO IMPROVE IMPLEMENTATION, COORDINATION AND ALIGNMENT WITH NATIONAL AGRICULTURE INVESTMENT PLANS (NAIPs) Day 2 Donor Coordination,

CAADP 10 YEARS ON: DIALOGUE TO IMPROVE IMPLEMENTATION,

COORDINATION AND ALIGNMENT WITH NATIONAL AGRICULTURE

INVESTMENT PLANS (NAIPs)

Day 2Donor Coordination,

Harmonization and Alignment

Who’s Here

• Quick Introductions of Delegates– Boaz Blackie Kezire

Day 1 RECAP & SYNTHESIS

• Facilitator: Ed Rege

• Objective– Quickly review emerging priority issues identified

yesterday that need to be addressed to improve CAADP implementation over the next 10 years

Emerging Issues Arising from Group Break Outs Sessions

✓Private Sector – should be driving force. Public sector should support Private sector to achieve sustainability

✓M&E (tracking progress) and KM (Impact oriented policies / commitments / outcomes)

✓Embedding thinking and doing in national

frameworks (NAIPs)

✓Sustainability/ self-sustaining (e.g. continuing investment that doesn’t depend on outside resources, building institutional framework, continuity of program)

Emerging Issues Arising from Group Break Outs Sessions

✓ Bringing youth into agriculture• Be more direct in supporting PPPs in value chain development so

youth can benefit • Entrepreneurship training for youth

✓ Local capacity / institutional strengthening✓ Political commitment at all levels

• Develop model on how we can promote to encourage political commitment of our principles

✓ Go beyond drafting documents to our own resource mobilization and identify other sources of funding beyond what we are already familiar with.

✓ Consistency, stable, predictable government polices (e.g. trade policies) ✓ Research for development / innovative ideas being introduced into agr.

systems

BIG ISSUES Mentioned by these Regions

No. of Times

Private Sector – should be driving force. Public sector should support Private sector to achieve sustainability

Southern Africa, East Africa, West Africa GR1, West Africa GR 2

4

M&E (tracking progress) and KM (Impact oriented policies / commitments / outcomes)

Southern Africa, East Africa, West Africa GR1,

3

Embedding thinking and doing in national frameworks (NAIPs)

Southern Africa, East Africa

2

Sustainability/ self-sustaining East Africa, West Africa GR1,

2

Bringing youth into agriculture Southern Africa, West Africa GR 2,

2

Day 2: Donor Coordination, Harmonization and Alignment -

Conditions to be MetObjectives:

• Exchange ideas and suggestions on current status of donor coordination and alignment

• Share ideas on how to improve donor coordination and alignment (at country level, between in-country and headquarter offices)

• Clarify conditions that countries need to meet in order for donors to turn promised support into high level policy commitments

Part 1• Status of Donor Coordination, Harmonization

and Alignment (10 min)– Jeff Hill, USAID Food Security Policy Chief

• Sample Responses on Mutual Accountability, Donor Alignment, Coordination and Aid Effectiveness Stocktaking Exercise (10 min)– Hubert Cathala, DPTT

Panel Dialogue

Moderator: Boaz Blackie Keizire• Saga Pascal Yves Ilboudo, PS, Ministry of Agr for

Coordination of Agriculture Policy, Burkina Faso• Patrick Mutabwire, PS, Ministry of Local

Government, Uganda • Fenton Sands, USAID/Ghana, ASWG• Sam Kanyarukiga, CAADP Coordinator in COMESA • Eric Force, ADWG/DPTT Country Rep, Cameroun

BREAK

30 min

Mapping Donor Coordination EffortsObjective:• Share case studies that illustrate what it

takes to align efforts of donors and countries or regions to achieve a common goal

Donor Mapping Cases

• ECOWAS: Donor Mapping (15 min)– Alain Sy Traore, Director of Agriculture, ECOWAS

• Ethiopia: Examples of approaches and tools used to support better coordination (15 min)– Ato Dejene and Gary Wallace, MoA and Donor

Coordinators of RED&FS Discussion, Ethiopia

• Discussion / Summary

LUNCH – 1 HOUR RECONVENE BRIEFLY IN PLENARY IMMEDIATELY AFTER LUNCH

Afternoon DISCUSSION TASK

Objectives of group discussion:• Agree on 3-4 most critical donor coordination,

harmonization and alignment issues that need to be fixed

• Brainstorm and agree on 3-4 specific, realistic actions that can be taken to overcome these issues (how can they be fixed)

• Summarize 3-4 Issues and How to Fix Them

Process• Country teams will meet in regional groups after lunch• NO FORMAL PRESENTATIONS – Keep comments concise so

everyone can participate in dialogue

REMEMBER• Frank, open dialogue

– share experiences on how issues have been dealt with to date– help outline and guide specific actions needed to address these issues

or challenges

• These are sessions to learn from each other– It’s a RARE opportunity to have collegial problem solving discussions --

starting with a good understanding of the problems you are facing and MOVING TO SOLUTIONS

Focus Questions1. How Do You Recognize If Coordination,

Harmonization and Alignment are really happening? (What would be the most critical indicators)

– Agree on 3-4 Indicators

2. What specific actions would you suggest to make coordination / alignment happen or to improve it beyond the current situation

– agree on 3-4 Actions

3. What is currently constraining national level leadership in coordination, alignment and harmonization? What specific steps should be taken to address this issue?

– Share 3-4 suggestions

Regional Group Configuration

West Africa Group 1 (Jim Tefft) – CAUCUS 11Burkina Faso, Cameroun, Sierra Leone, Mauritania, ECOWAS West Africa Group 2: (Maurice Lorka) – CAUCUS 12Ivory Coast, Senegal, Togo, DRC, Niger, ECOWAS East Africa: (Mbosonge Mwenechanya)– CAUCUS 13 Ethiopia, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda, COMESA, IGAD Southern Africa: (Nalishebo Meebelo) – CAUCUS 10Mozambique, South Africa, Malawi, Zambia, COMESA

Donor Coordination, Harmonization & Alignment – HOW DO WE MAKE IT WORK

REGIONAL GROUP DISCUSSIONS UNTIL 1600

BREAK AT 1600/PLENARY AT 1630

BREAK (30 MIN)

Specific ACTIONS Needed To Improve Donor Coordination, Harmonization & Alignment

Reports, Discussion & Synthesis

Objectives

• Share reports

• Agree on most critical issues and most realistic actions needed on donor coordination, harmonization and alignment

• Agreements will provide input into revised “Guidelines for Donor Support to CAADP Process at a Country Level”

WRAP UP

WHAT HAPPENS TOMORROW