Top Banner
C3-2
52

C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

Aug 13, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

C3-2

CNSMITH
Ni'Mip CPCN
Page 2: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005

Commision Order G 114 05

Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations

Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C.

on the East Osoyoos Substation Project Nk'Mip Project

as presented by FortisBC to t h e BC Utilities Commission

as an Application for a Certificate of Public Convenience

and Necessiwp /,Public Oral Hearing January 21st 2006 ...

Page 3: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

My i n t e r s t in this aHair, bgan when I was adviW by No pung women who were em p low by a wmparr)l who smializm in RighB af-Way Acqulremerrl, that FofiisBC was am& to build a WkV line an top of our presnt disaibaion sstem for eimri@Q*

This iine was to be Binisha by t h e end of Sptemkr 200% and I h q r q u i r d a!iI ofthe land owneE to sign rap fiat now-, Right now was JuQ 2mh 2W5,.

L a than No w w k s later I found a mle -&ion marCad on my driveway ~verrreM p l e ~ R i o a r 22% IbM it was by 1.2 mees and was adjamfit to the ex&tCng wie.

"$b pie ~ R i o n ks lw "Ian thim fwt from my front dmr, Bow fmt from where 1 p m k e of my meals and %- than six P e t from pasing f radfic..

Distribution is one? th ing High Vobge transmr"sic3on is qu&e "Ie other esmially in such a dangerous I ion in my Front yard,,

"B"S?is & my inteast, it breaths (lawn my nwk and it threatens my veq existen= on and in a p!am I retirM to in "r94,-

I am qu&e angv that 1 am bing threatend in this manner and by these means, amLhsugh what mn one are driven by "lhe bgom line and don2 gim a damn for p p l e or Pr~mW*-

Public mil%is are amially prone to this, as they want to efiraa as much rrronley as they ibiy mra from as IMle a -@gal outlay as

ible. Such is the re sf t h e k a a

h g e One.

Page 4: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

I w#ll do my w&h what D have, even 8 1 am old and kickd In, D am a

nwtive, lmk as though t h q warrtd 4x1 do this as an end run and do kt cheap at all --- Cheap for them, at any CW for us..

, =few "ee Bargst of considerations, mnsicleraaon "Ihe Beast, kwp m% to a (lawrate minimum.

% kt is w%h heaw hea& gal anger and dswir, that I s~fi this epistle. ii Qke the @me now to aplogize , for this may k a long and winding trail bcrB in the end 1 h o p it ma&= x n w to the Gcomranision and t h q make "re mar- dwisr'ons for us as well as Fofl8sBG.

There is a Io@mi long time wl&#on to th& mutual problem that we 6;-@iz8ns of KinGisher O r i e and FomBC k and it is to this end B swa k-.,

I wil! m y w&hin t h e material which has b n so kindly suppiid to me by ForlisBC and will wRh their own wads and @atemen& wsuade them -Icd Qke B more g!obal Imk at the problem, howfully t h e ~mmis ia ra wid! agfe, at least to va of it a d swh as reach a blegotiatd acmp@$le compmm&.

Page 5: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

ChaMer One:

This ail kgan on Wanmay July 2g)r:Z-r when NO flung women arr ivd on our p r o ~ m ~ sQting that IIlw were fmm h n d s W m t a comwrry which smializd in obQSning R i a & a f WayP Wuiskions and Esrvirow rrzrenQn S e w i s ,

Leabe= than the had-n Icr-usln- that they r e p r w n t a .

The gids had &n well briefs and it a p w r d they knew by rae what to wyI and how to m y it and how to handle various sReralions as

rn to faze them in any nd their a61:Rerde toward

a& did not undemnd or and their sm%c pu

One of the young women indimtd she had amaimed a 81nivesm kg rw Srr Mun ie i~ l PlannOng the other I think was along egher as a Sraclenl: in training or a Bhld mrl$r in t h e s&uatiora*

NmI- to ~y it was vev dimngts.rmi~g to hear that FoeisBC was planning on not on& bullding t h k 60kV line by t he end of Septembr but aim having it in o ~ m t i o n on OD" a b @ that date,

Thq impr"-a rawn us that time was of the =me so@ of corrrpndtion for our

I was apwlld to s y the leas, at t he ~ / I c ) u s aagude of th young women and as a r s u & b t h my wge, Pa and %, expr-4 our wish not to have 8nflhf~rg to do wRh such a p

Page 3.

Page 6: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

A-FIer t h e young women dewfia I anemptd to mnWa FQTBIsBC for some "Farr;lher expianations ber2, when I telephrsnd, I

not rewnct to my mil $a if there m s an emergenq9 to mrr&e arraher n u m k r or =mething to that 9-t was not an auspicious &ginning and it M e a dim bor$ure of this whole aRtia.

men I mOId the head office of bnds W e t in W~tMnlkb B-C, and was told all qu-ferns were srnswerd by their head ofliw on Mew Wstmin&er B-C,

When I finally found their niarsrkr by Iimking on the Web, I reachd their offie= only to h mid a very g W uo3fliendiy voie that they dldn"2 answer any cqumions btrl wmmne m i a t be there tomorr69w but he wasrs? sure and fmm his tone of mice I k n w his i n t e r s t in my mncerns were nil-

It was at Phis time ! realizd that the ih%8ii&is ammision might be able to answer =me qcrstians sn just what was going on,

to the B,C, Miiaim 6.mrmmisian was sent to a Mr, Peter Wergaard but was ae fud u s no one of that name was emplow in that E ) ~ W ,

i - l i d t h e Ba&-%isla mlrambia MSBi~s mmmbion and s ~ k e to a very pieamrrl. young woman there who mr&ully expiaind to me that "Ihe

prowr a d d r ~ would be to the *aeQv and s h e prwidd me w@h t h e emall a d d r w and the m r r a name of RokpB &lla"tlr--

My irrPormation was outdatd and inmrrm that 1 r s e i v a from t h e net an the BCUC.

At that ~ i n t in time, my w@e and I prepard a Omer to s n d to the iEZrgisl-8 blumbia WiIR;Bi= ~ m m i s i o n by email,,,

Page 7: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

Here b the email d a t a W a n d a y July 2C01h 2005 a"l4321rbi.6,

My name is Den& HUB! and I rs ide at Kisr@sher Drive in B,Ce

r"al supplier is FofllsSC., Tday I was innforma that th& m@isBC mmmny ws mnsiatering placing a 60kV Transmision line on @p of our exhting wlm on the disribrloion swem,,

This area Is wlid rwidentia! w%iEh warrow rmds and subjw to high win& oP6the lake .

ntativm from b n d s W e , who are mncluaiszg a S U W ~

for FoaBbBC wid that mn&ruaion may or muid mfl: as early as Sememkr and tt Zs this rush that mnwxns me that there may not have h n smcienh rch and wnsubticmr on the subjea Bbae an enginering shema was p a foeh..

P1eaw rep& to arzss~I:~e!ussnett Thank you,,

i d a rep& by email from "Ikme n, and it read.-" Please e aaachd dwarment regarding

My wmputer d w i d a to a@ up and as I r ~ u l l 1 had Bia wait for the haad copy to arrie*

I was wv anxious to read what the mrrrmision would m y abu t this psojm-.

Page 5..

Page 8: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

Fam on ChaMer One ::

For"risBC must have an awn pmjm in opratisn-

For Fo~isBC 80 hire the h n d muisatlion m m ~ n y of b n d s W W

inrdimt~ that d ~ i g n , esttglnwdrrg and material pmurement has W n

m e Prtdba ble deliverf9 bat= for material and s h d r a l i n g of the

heay en& and other re%ata pmnne9 and t h e ro&e !aid down where

the line is to k ecrrrsrsrad have no doubt i .n

apprcovd and

We asusrrd that t h e p m j a mars have

approvai from the BrKsh mbum bra Wi%im ~rasmis i a r a to p a w d on a

somwhat Iimitd bs& until the r a u b Pmm bnds Wsie arrlvd, the

offhis p m j a wmpf&d

to the Ie@I' dep@menB sti&aaion,,

infarmation @%n to me, remrding the m&hds!m of apprmch by

hnds W e , is that t h q r a d mone@r)P rewad g $150,80 for signin@,

promi= that the bnds Re@Ss)c cm"I;s would be mid for and theme &her

m e t h a s if =me m p l e refusd to

Page 6..

Page 9: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

Realme of Chapter One::

% was wmpiietely blind sidd by this approach clb b n d s W a and

my reaaiorr was s w f i and prdi-ble,

The %a that rather than face the %and ownea Fa= to face on this

a%a/n wmething they k n w mat FfifiisBG as a comwny muid not do in

"lhe F f s h t

Th-e young women emplow by h n d s W e t were sent out as a

p % q to get =me of the older p p l e mnvisra t h e shouqd sign,, "B"e will

to plea* d e p into all of u s exwpl: if yola are a ail@ wmwnyY

Some ofthe more elder D am tolid did have nd though& al=her

conferring w@h their younger generation.

The realQ of it ail is that the pian did not wo&, Band ownem did

not sign and the plan, if there was one, was not a g a one, nor was it

amble of convincing the ePI:wtd land owme=, mwIC jncIu&jd, that

there was any mer& in even a%em@iwg such a rrnbemlcirag,

Page 10: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

At this time, I mule5 only how that FoRisBC in their InfisaRe

wgsdom, MII:CIU(~ apw166"L a ~ S B W who was able to cornsrarrnimte w&h the

the mgle in the area and Ive t h k pmblem which FoelsBC had

t h r u a on us.*

This ends the rag@ ion of Clilager one we now

mnlinue wRh t"lh ermptisns..

The wrwpt1ons of Chamer One,,

so mild prwptions are my prm@io$os only and each of

the do~~owlng Chap2.e~ will have a Faa

Perception* ion,,

This is t~ deal w@h t he Fam and men the Realm

and then my w~eption af just what B &king plaw and whyla-

My ~rwp@on at "ris wirr'e is that FccI~SSBC is not &#ng "Fe)~hrimZ

egher in their p

mr young girls into this s&-luation,

T h q were pmbably just B~issg to earn m o n q on a summer job .

Page 8mms

Page 11: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

On ThuMay the 28h day of Jrriiy 2W5 1 i v d an email from

a wmn ideatwing hirnseg as KEITH SONES, PROJECT MANAGER,,

it was abo a d d r m d to a ME Gmrge Bsl-sewBQIJ who tails at the head

This email read as follows:

Mr* Hull:

I rweivd a wpy of your emaii to t h e BC Mi9%is mnasrstision wfth to the FoflisBC plan to mnstrrra a 60Kv p w e r line in

am the p r o j a Manager far that WO*, and would be happy tlo discus ahis w&h wlr in wmn in greater rJe&l'l, % am in @morrow (July 2SI-o )- wuid p u be awiiable to m H 3 D will pirechbllr; not have a email s"or the are& wvera6 hours, so pleas mil me on my =IS phone 8 250-.36&1821 W you would like to get together-

Senior Pmjm Manager, Tmnsmision and DiSrlbaion &@%a!

He then gave me some quaint old sy i rns from d a p of pre..

t h e easy "ehig is to quit

the right thing is to nems give up and be p u r h t evew ame:

Page 12: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

tf he was aaerrrpting mend Ir& wildst

When me finally m a I he was !ate, b& that was ex thorrghwu! enough to email me at hB plimt.

Vew nim chap earemety well w m d in all subj mffe and while we swke abu t vadous gems I nealizd that he was a p ~ m example of a fmnt man, orre "rat could -I! fridge to Bkirrrm.

He had arrswes to all qrmmions and we c l b u s d f r e l y a Icrl of topi=, =me of which I muld sense h e bristld at b& h e kept his CCDCI!,,

We wen go"l to "ehe subj- of expropriatie~n b& IeR that one alone far the Ie@l clep@mexll: bbll it was USA and &ken as a dir& threat- Pemption Is sorrretirn~ a @eater "FC3rw than t r a h and truth Is subjsti*,

We a@- to disgrm, on a Iot of topi= and a Oat of rang= but we kept it civil. I ~ndem- fmm our diwusion that his primavdbciplSne was ~mrrrae! and MW and that would explain t h e lack of the iron ring

I had a arange felingthat he was n& levelling wRh me on 2611 and it was Iater that this prern~)n@filon =me to fruRbn but that is

for later,, another aovp another place,, He %eR me some dmumearQtion on his proja* which aRer a %w

min&s aRer he IeR I read for an intewal and realfiza that the information was irrmherent unl- I had the indae t h e aflielw referend to in the rewe- $In 812% topic I emaila his om* for t he informatior bu;l died not ie all)l Curlher information

Sa R was on Friday Ju& 2%212W5, amund 320 Pm E T that Re? dep8rl:d and I knew at th& Birrre, and all t h e p p i t e wha l i vd around KinGirsher Drive were in for a fight to prot- our prop* and way sf is.

Page 13: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

That evening I sePlI an Email "Ice t he IZreish QOumbia Mil@ia @mmision as it -19:atM the f~llowing

"Weher to my mmmmniwtism re Foeis mnSruaOon, Thank you for giving me "Ilne crppr;tura@ -I8 swak wRh wmmne fmm Fofiis reefding this 60kV line- KeRh Sons, Senior Projm Manager

me this aftemmn regarding this m8-M:er and we d i s u s d the various problems facing ali paeis,,

Basimtiy this p m j a is king pm together under the p r e m i s of Cheap is B=t rather than L s h ~ n s i v e is kaer.

1 bad prepar4 =me QIkirrg win& in advan= and thee I would like to share wgh you For pr r r wru=i.

Origintally the p and the spira of the @wen for ssidenllal distdbu d as such may rquire a

The prser?"e rimlef-way may not be large errlaugh "lo a rrrrsraate the pro owmead-

Any change to the splrR of the @ven rimtaf-way should be in the I to each propP1")1 iand ownem and should

wnrwirn the format for flexible disrasioar con b t h slds, , Real BQte v a l u s ha= to k wrrsiclerd and -Ifre I- of real

=tat@ value in tdayvs ma&& and the pro I#@ of " fe change of m t e %r the fMure wrid OF use WQUM "ICD be mmpIIId, mmpred and agrW u p n by each iradilvidarai land owner*.,,

The B-C. brad appraiwl urr& should k msmsar&d as 80 what eff- the @ r a p 4 mrbrrilrd would ha* on land mS;um and the proj-4 liw of tax monq fmm this arm-.

financial mnsiderations for t h e landownem shsu8d k pirrtd ON and made available w th individuals may make their own decisions w&horrt any asmide darre,,

Page 19

Page 14: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

Should t h e e pm Is of an oveauild be put foah and arrld on aelsast the rrrajorm of landowne~, the mmmny had Maes mnsider t h e financial rewnsibil@ which may sudber91y a p m r if =me of a@Sroplnic failure were to Qke ptace wER a rescrbnt i n j u ~ ~ I= of !We and pr~mm damage w u a by eonstrrrci:icrn and/or maintenan=.,

"n"e p h ~ i a l aB@b&s of the plan are Flawd use of the smw rqar-iremen&-- Kinssher Drive is wide enough on@ to alIc4w WO trame i ans and one lane for m&ing pu s on the s6ra;hh side of t he Drive-. The Zoning here is R i which is rsiclential for sin@e family dwellins and the raidencs cm me lakeide of the rmd ham b n pfiwcl at over sk harndrd thrsusnd pl i d s being narrow in wi&h, the Driw has wme of the fin@ rea available in & and placing a 60kV transmbiorr line on F"m Pcrot wls down one side would k a t

"The D r i e is tm crowd4 wRh reidencm and & subjm to somI-renQ winds from the lake which has in the WS blown down t and &ken rm% caCl the building abve the drke, l"e B crowded n~idesrtia1/E.c1urist area in t he summer and a cramm in transmision line has no plaw here, Just Fcrr t h e sf@@ reasons..

The =laion would k to turn east Fmm the p nt wwer station and go down that amnue to the wLI.rhernr Dane of Main Stre% and connm w&h the line easl: at that pint* . That a=rrue is %rai@& has rmm FOP subble ground aurchom and has the wicB$h to handle the overbuild.. I"I is a b in mirarer wind areas and would k more 8s"x:sibie to ground ere- for maintenance,, Kin#sRer D s i e has an average of WO hcandrd m s an hour budng "Ee summer and a rslyriad of wrnent true&, gram! trucks and shml bus=. The avenue adjawnt to the p w e r swRc$r station is much I-,,

I am agairrs this pro 1 hd on the foilowing win&, Safm9 b n d Vaiua, Tax L s , Amhetic Value and the line muld b p i a d etsewhere.,

Cheap is t he prior@ not iarexwnsive w%h intei!igerrce,-

Page 15: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

N& in my front mrd where spray Ifmm my hme mu9d me lethal, Not in my front psd where t h e sMher9y g a b auld prrt wirw and pis a c r w my house.. Not 8 my front kmuw should some wwer ! i n s mme down ewn the fire truck and ambulanm mu!rdar"l g f thmugh..

Not on my front yard kmuse F o e is only i n t e r d d in Cheap at ail cmB and haw never b k e n any of my cconerns aha the existing sptem wrious!y*

brmption is evewhing to do w@h valuw and Cheap at all Is ncrB acmpaable ... Than&,

"Bat evening of hiday July 2%h when I wmte that Ieaea to the BrRish miurnifria ammision I had no know8Mge of any of the projm plans of F o ~ & for %his 60kV line and as such was earerneiy Iimged 107

my s m ~ of ideas=

Ke&h Son= did m a t voluntet much informati~n ag:ept it would be ow me a wmin urgency in the

whole maser which a m u d my interm as to why the sudden rush,

Had KeRh %ns, given me a of the CPCN for EaS theme wcfu4d have W n a dmrenl wu!dn"i, it had ncrB b n made up and as it F u r n a oln was not available until Octokr 1 Z h 2005,-

it was morning obvious that =mething was amis in the timing of this /PIC)/&,-

Page 16: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

That was l as Friday and now tday is T u d a y and I rweiva that hard copy leaer from the BrRish mlumboia Mii@is bmmision refeming to my original email asking b u t this 60kV !ine,,

The m m m i s i o n did not know abu t this 6OkV p r o j a nor had it "fven

This is what the Ieaer w M:

It was add 60 Mr Gmrge !shew& of Trail BE, and =id

ipt of an Email from Mr- Denis HuO% who advir"ss t he mmmlsion that FoaisBC is planning %a instail a 60 kV p w e a fine through his rmidep-rlial neighburhw, The mmmision is unaware of the pmjwt and would Bike to raeive 33 rek)e31PL 6780 this mager,

Weaw review the enclmd Emai% and pmide the mmmision and the cuaomer wRh a rel;canse

Sigrid kR-BglSanw M- SmRh far R o k f i J$, kBIaB6.

Ke&h Sons sat. in my Iiving r w m and made out they were going to drive Phis p ro j e through come hell or high water,, and the bmmis ion did not know anshirrrg amfl I%!

What a s h w k , my irr-lraairsn and premosrnRion was corrWP be wasnY on the ievei-

If h e wid he dMn% knowI it show lack sf wmmoniation, if he s* h e did know but forgot to mention it, it 5190% a lack of masrPIayy

Page 17: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

More s u r p r i w were to come!

W a n d a y morning August 3rd pie pmora g a k s were p l a d along KinBsher Drive by a crew bird by %=errilisBC. On that day I s n f an Email to t h e SmreBry of t h e BrRlsh miurn bia MiHftla ammision and I quote:

ivM yous IeQer d a t a July 25th ~ t e d a y ~ stating that you B-C-

Pi=* h advisd "eat tday thw placd wle ~ R i s n inclimtos along the strwt and one of them, was 2-22 m & e ~ from a pin t in my driveway and I- than t h i m P e t From rary rmirlene,.- I objea

sion of pnkaw and the meaaaa! danger which may

on here 3 Very woaria, Sinmreiy Denis Hull ann~t~eDusSnr&

Anaher @a* of Ke&R Scms not lieveiling w&h mern. He mug have knwn t h e sumey csw was scharald, if he didnY ,

the seuatiars as& t h e qustiesn of lndfierenw, if be did know then it was a rnaaen of greater indwerence,

There had brm no mention of wle ~ R i s r r pgs to come. "he only remark he made of any signmwrnce in our mmting ,was an omand Satemel-ol that " H e wc)rz!cler;"c, want a 60kV nine in his front yad".

And to top it a11 csF%p when % enqu i rd if -9:1 could spak wRh Keah Sons, he had mnvenienfQ gone on Rolidap for a wmk of so and would get back to me when he got bckm-

Here we have a sRua2irso"r where a major MilR-eie mmpany is threatening the verj, core and living mndgions of dozens of & c%izerrs w&h a hiclmus proma! and then t he Senior P r o j a Manager dwidd to take a holiday- J u a how insens&ive a n an Mmme.

Page 18: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

KeBh % n s of FofiisBC would not have wrrQct4 me when he did. The reason he did all was -Is, r smnd to t h e r q u e t the mmmis ion had paJI $clr"rh rwpndirmg to my r q u & of July 2WR 2W5,

When I-re did a l l he did not mesllican t h e qnev that had b r r d i r m 4 to them by the mrnmision rqueting t h q wnQa me.

He spke to me as this proj- was a done deal and it was ju%l: a maQea of crwing the and dmiarg the em.

Na mention was made of any dueher ac%ican to be taken by Fort.isS6 and at that time I had no idea what was in the %e@er from the mrrrrrrision until the 8eEes a r r i d August 3rd-

"The mm2enB of "le Imer indimtw that Fo91BBC w a owrating wRhsM the knowldge 08 consent 616 the Brgish alumbia Milgia &mmlsion, and was months away from even kavisag a &pl@wte: of PubDic mnvenienm and iPtJ Ry premrd for subslaision,

He %eft me wRFa inwmpilete information and the irrabilw to ob&in the balanm of in@rmalicon 8qu r " rd - ( he went on hcrliria* ).

"Be ~wgaliraan sf all th It was ible "Ihat For"risSC h a m that "Iey might get this line in vev quickly and quietby and argue abm8 t h e fa@8 latec

The LDtiORiw m m m i s i o n would !earn of this conSrualsn aRer it was clone. It wou%d be dmcuR if not im ible wRl-rout a gr: dear r;>B probiems to return the sptem to its r>fl@naf state and thesefore b ai90wd to stand:

Any mmpiiainB aRer that "Birrre would be futiie.

Page 19: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

Chapter Thrm,

The r e p n s fmm the Br&ish mlumbia Mil%ie Wmmision arr ivd August 4th 2W5 in "1e form of an Email a d d r w d to me and to George IshelvrlW FoPaisBC in Trail,,

"The r spnse was S W ~ and dirm and read as fo!%o%,-

" Denis: Wah regams to p u r nt EmalOs corrwrnlng the mym 60kV

overbuitd, the mmmis ion will be wa&ing for Fleafiis136"s rewe that we askd for on July 25th-

& you indimt4 Ke&h mrrs did vCsR ~ l d and we crndemQrrd "eat he is S111 on halidap- Howwe1; we have wntaad Gmrge 1shewa in Tmil and a n adaris as follows:

1, "The projm has not %: Men finaliza. The pie ~ R i o n indiwtos that yola s e are how t h e and guy wirw would k piacd adjamnt to the prowP"lis aaL6-a,

2, For"risBC is wnsidedng having an o p n ~ Q U S in the area to inform adjacent prow@ owners; however, any such deBils has not *I: h n finalizd.

In future, wmmen& should not only mme to the BCUC but aiw to FoflisBC as they will be mmtmranicating the repa 80 t he @mmision as well,

Your Emaib mn go to Gmrge Ishew- at: gmrge-isilaew~WorZ&~~corn

I how t h s e wl%"rmenG help, as your waurplaint RBe is stiI% own,.

Page 20: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

A Imea, d a t a August i 6 t h 2005 arrivd by Email from Ke&h Son-.. The subjm :

The Pro Transmisisn ClrcuR -Sin

during our m e t i n g at your home on July 2%h 2005, FoflisBG is prowing to change the mrt"Figuralion of t he high mbge elarim8 circu& on Kingisher Driw in 0s There

at are requi rd , and we are Icsrakirrg to Beast imrr;3a and t h e low& reawnable

I have rweivd the cornmen& p u s n t -e(0 t he BC MiiRia mmsrrisiarr and undestand you are concern& a h & our pjans-

"L""he rsidenlial and mmmercial gr~Wh in the area is matchd

Wvetopment Plan, p n t 4 to t h e BC Mil%is &mmisiopr in late 2004, demonstrats the n@ for more w ~ c i r om t he eaa side of moyow. FofiisBC intends to provide this add%ima9~)3a4c@ in $Vro s&ge, By 2006, we wili mnSrua a new 13kV di;lfib&ion circu@ to east & fmm the existing subwtion, By 2007, we will corrstrara a new

F=eofiisBC intends to complete the fist s&ge by rebuilding the 13kV distribution circu& mat p ntly parallels Kingisher Drive and adding a s s o n d eircug on t h e sa 1s- The rebui& Ilne will k dslgn4 to ailow eventual 60kV transmision so "rat we a n nomimliy complete

nd s&ge of the plan- If the BC Ir;eil&.eis mrramision approvs t h e ccrnstruabn of the new subtation, we mmn u s the already eosostrarad v w e r line to sewe 8s the transmision connWion from the existing b subtation,

i have aaemptd 80 summarize t h e t h e m a that you pnsemtM in your Iaer -to the BC U t i i R i s &mmisian- You raise several s~8ima"c isurn, and I h o p my rwwnw help aria,, th

Page 21: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

l ine as it jleiats "iCd the public, %IS.

Fo@isSC 8s

our high& prior@* Power line d ~ i g n , corrSmmon QwhnSqus and materials are all *lad wRh sm in mind. WZgn cr&erSa rqrrire that the ! i n s and their srapwrling Hr r rau re b able to w&hSand for= much higher than t h aaualOy ant ic i~ta . Wind and ie loading are mth fa&c)rd , s ~ m m / & ~ as are ground clmmnm to ailow traFFic and other normal acfivftia, including lawn spdnkllng to m u r w&kaou;e risk,

In the weral that wm&hing d mum a struaure to fail and w i r s to wme to the ground such as a vehicle millding wRh a ~ i e , the wwer sstem will ~ 1 % b bui&-in protwicm to acrl:omatimliy d~rc?e@re the circu% ZImrrrdiaite!, there& preventing dsk "Lo t he public,

!sue #2: ""Cheap is

k e p down, we Iwk 10w rPIe ratepaps as a

whale From unrwsoo-rable wontsmic miul:I"on, w alw ensure that the sptem B s& and that synergic, such as &lancing long term wil&Corrs and shoe term fix=, are sought and em piow where Ibie.

We evaluatd =era! akernatr'w mMs for the new cf.l.@u&, but the one p m w d a!ong Klngmeher Dd* has the least impaa to the wmmunw as a whofe, as It d r"lC31: intrdum a mmpl&ely new wwer

IJiilf~fiunately, as the subQtiarrr is in a rwidential area, the connming

crC this option I r i m s the ovemead deigns and there is alw the Cat4 wRh pminrg singe mrrrce ["radial")

trarrsmisbn underground,

Page 22: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

The aaBemate roIrle you SUE- r r r ~ k i;rQraaive as a hcrmmwner along the p r o m 4 route, b a it would increase the impace to &her landownes as [MRWI] we11 as add wveral hurrdrd thousnd dollas to the g m j a wt. If an akerrratbe route was =!&dl the cinu&

nt& on Kingsher Drive would have to be rehabilgated in the n e ~ %W yeam from a maintenance (sm and relia bilw) p r s Sin= it was ~onstr~(IZd~ Sandards haw changa and we would still be r q u i r a to increase p i e height and anchoring cJisBnm irr several m s s *

placing the WQ circrr& on a single s t of s t r u a u r s and using a relatively straight line h W e n t he Highway 3, which the n w GIIGU@ US a are r 4 u d and the rate immc% is kept tcs a minimum,

[sue #3 Rean 6 W t e Va!us 81?d the %mma 53°F a Power Line,

There is tale doubt that given an oflion, few w p l e would indewnderrlly ch to haw an ove&ead ~ w e r Iine in their yard- Our b n d &en& are currently Qlking to each clirmly a landowner and arranging @r the appropsiale mmpnwtiora. (3nw again, by not adding a mend p w e r line to the town, the net efim on real "Ihe su men& should be kept to a mlnlmtrm-

s u e 4 Kingisher Drive is Tm Narrow -n;o mnsl:rua ZSlBe New Une

KinGisher Drive is i n d a dmi@d for rwidentiaf flow and wrrsruaing the pro However, it k wmi SbDe "lo build along that while not isnwirrg tragic flow* improving m s t r i a n "rafie fiow ( by moving the

that are currently in the middie 0f the sidewalk) and main&inlng a high leml of public sf@@- The transmision enanwr irrvolvecl has many sars of praei-l exprierrce and has broumt that insight into this line ad=ign.

Page 23: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

During our rwent wnvemation, YC)U mentiofid that you had wn@CrBd ForlisSC (and & p r d rs) on a n u m h r of ~ ~ S / O P I S w@BO

the s m R s and amlogize if yola did not iw the *mice you

and were ins in Maah 2085 to ensure they remalnd wfe- Our Owrations mBF anf i rma that the 1eveI of wslry is awpQble-

& t he projm ceirrtInus, t would N haplay to c S ! s u s thme and other i s u s wRh you and any other intersta paeie- We will engage in far t t and frank di:-c;rzu%ions w&h any irrtersw m e m b s of "khe pubIic, and if n qI- may hold an own houw or similar public forum in "Ihe early fa11, fn the meantime, I am availabie plrone,email, or in ~ ~ 0 8 1 sklouid a psonal visR be reqrrda. PI@@* k e p in touch.

Ke%h a n - S n i s r blaoj- Manager,

w: R J.h19a% BCUC Vancouver B.6,

Gm@e Islrewa ForllsBC Trail B,C,

This was the ieael" 1 rewivd fmm KeR"Bn4nm aRer he got h c k from his halldap and f t was in r=wnse to my emaii to Rok@ &19aQ, Friday July 2%h 2005.

bter in this dwument, I will refer back to thae mgm, ~Eering in my s-ion of reaiRia exaaly what was mnspirlng amrdissg to the fam of the day-

Page 24: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

"This ends the * r i d of time 1 have c lasf ia as a great question,

From al% what has taansplrd, t h e h n d s W a t appmch, the visk by KeRh

a n - of Fo&isBC , b.appam that the m m ~ r r y was under t he r"llusr"eon that they had wrmision to p wkh land awuismon, righB-4~f-way regisration and rnoramw exchangw for am=.

T h q even had s h d r r l d and a l l w l d money for the aaaaal suweying and p t mRlcrralrrg and may have b n in a WRian to provide materials and pmnnel isnrnaiately had this projm p r w W d in the manner in which t h q apwrelllly were aaernming to manipulate m p l e and sRuations.

There was no mention of this w&h my rn-ing w@h KeRh Son=, he already was in im C88 in%l)rmation that I would not have until t he following T u d a y maacerninrg the BCUC and he prohbiy knew of the suwq gang and the p i e m&lons that were going to Qke place, B& of f hwe f h ine , he did not s p a k and I wonder at the m@ive or reasoning khind it ail,

What FoIlowed w m the quiet wrid, wa%ing for FoflisBC ;I;B reply $0

the BrRish mlumbia Mil@!= mmrrrBisrr rqumt of Ju& 22th 2005.

The date was Semerrakr 23rd 2W5 when the eman"% of explana~cm and appiimtiora date of the CPCN arcrid and it was welwrrre. We had all w a R a a long time for this.

Page 25: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

Monday Sflerrrkr 26th 2065 1 remiW an email anom WrlisBC and R read:

" "S;ptemka 23rd 2005. Mr* RJ-hi!a% mmmision Swretav Brgish mlrrnnrbia Milit#- @mrrrisi~rr Box 250, SiHh Fimr; 900 Howe S t r e t Vanwuver 13-C, V6Z 2N3

mar Mr- PaiiaE Re: MKMirSip ( East C)is ) Subswtian Pmjm

At Page 62 oB the Daision acwrn~nflrrg BCUC Order G5245 regarding FoeisBC inc." 2005 Revenue Rqrriremen& Appl i~t ion~ S9tem Development Plan and Reokarm Plan, the mrnmision d i r m d FoPlisSC to file an appliation for a efi%ate of Public mnvenienm and NwsQ ("GWN") for the abve notd projw8, which at the time was

Sour=, This pmjm cronsise of a new line which would be wnndec8 to the existing sub&"gitan, Ismtd on the W& side of &

As pas 0446 the Deision, the mmmbion anso appro@ a projeel: ei;-rl"M as a N w & F M e s 4 to East (26305 Rwenue Rqui remenB Appiimtion, Tab 9, page 36).

This praj& invoivm overbuiiding an aisting 25 kV line wRbs andalher 25 kV distribrrlion circcr R- This second circuR is urgently rquired to m e t t he 2006 summer wak in East 0s ist the 2005 mp&al Plan, nor Setem belopmePl"I Plan, referad to ForlisSCs intention to mnvert t h e new u p ~ f circu% 10 63kV uwn ampletion of the NkWM igsbtatican, me mnvefled uppa circuit then Woirsaw t he 63kV line crming k W m n w s t and ea3

Page 23

Page 26: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

The mmpany is aware of mnmms by rsidfesrB of & par"licularly "ewe of Mr. kn i s W u!i, regadipag the FMer 4 pmjm, and was planning to hold an own house for the F M e r 4 p m j e -

The m m ~ n y now klievw that it sshclsald have ipacludd the F M e r 4 pro]- as the fist p h a s of the NkWMip Subtation Fsrojd. "rAlhi!e the double @ireuEing is cairn! to supplying p a k loads in t he east in 2006, it is appropriate to mmmR to the m m m i s i o n and Colsforraem that b@isBC wiil:

1, include the double drcuRi2ing proj& in t he Nk9MQ CPCN Appiimtian- 2. ~ ~ o r r r r no p h p i a l wnstruaion, other than shaking and planning on Fmer 4 until and lf the CPCN Mplimtion i v e approval from "Ihe

~ r r r m i s i o n , 3, file the C K N Mplimtion by the BM webe of W o k r 2885* and

4, hold a public own house on the App!iw%isrs by the third webs, of O a o b r 2135a5-

Given the caiwi ned for the c5ouMe circuRing FoflisBC intends to p r w d w&R pianning and enginwring the and will clrntinue to acquire easemeaaG-

Sholaid you rqu ine f a s~he r in%rmation in ahis maser, piease corsitaa t h e rrrmdesignd at 250 3M 0323.

George I s h e w a FortisBC m: Ma, Denis HuII ": Unquote,- BI is wcbrlh n;a"tr"ng that my original ge was sent "664 f he BCUC datd 4uiy 2&h 2005 and this leaer wa in seswnase a i m m WQ months later to the day

Page 27: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

This explanation of F6)rl:isBC For "ihe lack of dlsclmrrre mu% be IeR to -12ae mmrrrisiorr to cipher o a The mrramision have prohbly in their history, haw had lo& of various explanations for various s&rrations and 1 leave in their capable hands to dwipkaer just what For2isSC said and/or what they meant to s y - it -1. obvious t he f i r s try did n& work so IeB h o p "dis explanation is clear enough to unde~tand,

My prceptiaan is, that at this moment FoaisSC, has m n consistent mrrsistelat in not providing clear in-loamaticdn in aaem@ing to acquire Band eawment, m"ncomple& or ermnmus informalion by their agenB as confirmed by othes who have swken to me on this subj-,

mrrsistenl in providing incomplete or w&"aholdifig fa- of s&ualions, I: r q u e J a dmumenl that would have allows me 10 read and translate material which Ke%h Sons iefi me, I rewivd an acknow!edgemer?l. from his smre&8y thal h e had rseived the email but nothing was

farsdownes regarding compnstion- The figure of 150 do1181s has b n mentisnd and no one that I am p~oraally aquaintA wRh have signs any dwumerrS. & of spterrrkr 23rd 1 knew of no one who had rmeivd any of a feasible ofier, and there were no aclive easement acquiremen@ in p

I would asmme that an a m p " f 4 eal#iwte of Public bnvenience and Nw-iv would k a f i ~ t prior@ bfore any pians were made, any schdulirrg was set up or any Funds ail

But f h w PI= on apparently as Option 2 or 3 have not even bo%

csrssiderd as I ha= not s e n pie melon s taka out on Omion 2 and Option 3 a p p a s as a mpn o.FFerin$

So we have this promise that the CPCN will k in the bmmisiosa by the first w e k of Oaokr and "%at there will be a Public Met ing by t h e "eid wwk,

Page 28: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

On Oaokr 1%%r 2005 the NkWMip ( East

N s m i Q had h n a m m b l d and srrbmMd by FoirplisBC the Brgish blumbia Ml&iw mmrrrision for wnsideratian,

Foaunrately* tBhq alw sent a wia~, of this dwument to me, for my wrtrsir .

This was the fim o~; l~@uni& that I had to obwira any hard fa- k m u s this was a Iegal clmumenl and as far as susaina ble Pam and f l g u r s a b u t what is p r o m 4 under this projczc% It was preomisd to k deliwrd &the fim wwk in W o k r 2005 accodirsg to "re emaili of Spterrrkr 23rd 2005 and was rweivd dudrrg

The promise to hold a public m e t i n g was kept on s c h d u l e and as a r s u R t had Imle time to read, dig- and anal- t h e applimtiorr, The meeting was held the nea w e k mokr 201h 2005..

& a rmla6a of the msrrpr-d time Qine a i 1 m t d I answer4 as ks"h as t: couid wRh me irrd8rmatisn I muid glean from a few quick seadine of the applimtiaan-

bter, I apwndd a fuehes statement d a t d Woks 26th 2005 to rwtate my ararm at me projw seer the Public Meting put on by Fo6P-lisBG on %hire 21Peh of M o k r 2005 in & B.G,,,

statemen& may be obtain4 from a Imer of infer& mt& in the li* of information sent in by me da t a m o k r 2mka and 26th 2005..

They are len@hyv nong w i n d 4 by some s&wdards, but as badua8 as ible to the in%rmatiarn made available to me from the da& in the

appliwtion and the emnG at the Public Mmting held W o k r 2aI-r 2005

Page 29: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

The applimtian in my opinion is incomplae and m&leading in many saws,

Now that I have had the time to really digst the intent and scow of me projw appliation it k w m s apparent there are some giaring disrefsancle M W e n options.

In t h e first "Ie intent is to eaencl U L ( f he 63kV line Fmm Oliver) to EaS from the exi&ing serk"Iatiocdn h i d e "lhe daymre enter-

will build a new W s t & Submtion and fm the east Cb areas from mere,

Wekrin tkrB third option "Icy haw set aside funds for undergmeand WO* owa the museway to the amount of smeral rniiiions of dcoBlas, This amousr"c Is not mentiond in option one wen thou@ there wflraid be the =me amount of condueom over the narrow,

One of their Qlking pin& is that t h q would ham great dHi@;ra& in obtaining easement w&h wRags of f hat magnitude (138 kV )in this third option-

p in% are pM out as faa for the options, one they would build a line Bmm Oi le r de ignd for 13OkV and No, the Bmp option is vergr imprl:aM and the lack of it is paxl up as an argument against option wo-

ke% me explain this Imp cconwpt The NO saa ons woulrd have

wo subQtions would have a I i line k W w n "Iem s that one mufd f M the other and in this mse when one ea went down it would enable t h e other side to rwore the smem, Hence the deWna imp,

Page 30: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

it works great 8 the MiHQ has "Ihe apabiliv of co&ro!ling remotely or aut~matimlly~ sRuations of that nature, but "Ikis sHem is old by their own standards- In wme p l a w on the sstem it is unwise even -to t&

r~toration setems For fear of !wing coFl"lm( over the seeoation and not k ing abDe to a exwpt by manual means.

Manuai means, that a man with a "" HQTST!CKm manipulate s w & c h e manually w%-LZ-nin t he scr wrrm mnfiguration or us= push bwon wntroiins if available..

The FeofiisBG pople are installing wherever ible f i k r optic mble for e~)nfr~438 and mongoring and haw an uphill bare for a long time to wme-

This all CW% money and monq is what ail th8 is abut, My first impresion W8S 8 quick, cheap ," easy fix for now mentaiv, had W n chaew, M& Public BPe.il@i- should have a longer viewv in the range of tkrim @as or so, and plan awaa9ingly-

This KingFisher aption one d nothing but deprwiate lassdownem value of their prssww on a long time bsis for a shor"c term financial @in for the &r"iQ-

FoeisBC have known for some time thal t h q wifll have to m m the praent 0s ion and now is the opwn;eur%w to do Just that,

The prsent wo& around ,and, a Hazard to the Environment,

Page 31: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

On Page 27 of the MkMMip T r a n s m b b n and Sukwtion ProjW CPeN Appliation is also statd that failure of one of the WO transforme= at the exls8ing W e 0s SuMation will r ~ u d l Sn %reed Ioad shdding-

In another mrl: of theis reference material, they state that in t h e mw of an went such as smd shdd in& a signRimrmI: amount iab time wi%i p a s kfore they may be able to apply effmive measurs to restore t h e sptem and may or will amount to many mr"nMs ( h o u s 1 of oratage time.

Meanwhike, dewnding uwn t he sawn, a man#ofcb of problems may ensue, lack of water for hydraraB, lack of water and pumping bacil&is at the sewer plant, melting of Brezea whether commesciai or r~idential and lack of abilw to wmrm commercial am, such as buying gas, wg-lhdrawing funds fmm banks, pumping gas.. a, in &a this applslmtion prwidm CIS wgh ~nforrnati~n that

confirms the wn wndglon we find o u w ! ~ in regaaiwg t h e elmrical supply- From what I a n giean from the information, i% aapwam as though the rRsrrrpanyI rather than bing on top of the problem, is a few *as MPsind, and, we as citizens, and customers find ouae9vm threatend ,not on& w R ~ mr management but wRh the ibilw that

One of t h e character is of the Tmn-rmer saaaatianr is the fact that as long 8s the sflitem is not %ubj& to any quick changes of mndRiisn on load, it a n handlie it, gent&-

Howewr iff there should ur =me great outage such as a major accident where t h e p h a s e hit and or ground on t h e e Fmers, t he breakem may not have the chance of s dismneraion &fore insulation breakdown m u = in th transformem and they will faif in a

euiar s & ft is ,the 'rsanshrme may have problems handling any non

iinear @crosbRion, wrrsd by hi@ order harmonis = %me of these solid swte s@@ing device on the larger t h r e phase motors u s d in pumping for Irrigation, may intrduce qquge inn ntiy q.r, B h s e mndkions under ceaain circums"earag;:esSS

Page 29

Page 32: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

The &p%Smtblbi indim%= that Fofi&BC is intending Po % p a d millions Q 2-21 of dollars on Rehalailmtr"on and Replacing of t h e existing transfarmes in t h e exi;%hing W W 0s Srrb&ticsn in 2806-

"There is also a ground problem which will csl a few herndrd thouwrrrd dollam to bring up "eas s ~ i f i m l i o r ~

There ako the problem, that FoflisBC has adansM4 , that the groWh of and will grokb@ antlarue do out pace their -timalions in yea= 80 mme-

for furlher exmnsiow in ming mare rabjaianable to more male as time n more p p l e are indimting their displeasure at

having to be se rb jd to such a device in a rwidential area.

When t h e subtation is moved, the value of the land, will more than pay for the trouble it mused FoeisEZC to move t he subation in t he first place,

FoaisBC has laid out three choica, w&h t h r w sewrate cmt -timat=.

Option 1: 8-97 million-* this is via Kingisher Drive or in fmn"ef the shml, No bmp fa,

Option 2: 25-4 million This is to bring a fine from Oliver to f a the subBtieon, of which am@ 5 m111ion is aliocatd to Bsuiid the, and I quote" 338 kV rransmision iine. No Imp f a ,

Option 3: 14-3 midiion Build a new SuMa"lion in W s t of which 3.5 million is for underground eg; at the narrom- Bu e x p r ~ f& to East 0s T h q put away aiw 288,1460 dollas for land acquB&isrs- They already om land up in t he industrial area w&h ML line running right t h m u a it.

Page 33: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

W in Option 3 if p u subtra@r the 3.5 mi!Disn for the underground wo& and the $200,800 fand it beavs abe-rl WO million dmerenere,

This is abuts2 mn'lliocsrr over the pfiw of Option 1 but if taken into mnsideratiesn the $2-2 million set aside for the "h;an&omer rehabilmticsn there is smcienl: funds to mer the mt of a new s u ion on the land previorasiy pparrcha- far that p u n p e -

An exprm line a n k buik for East and a Brarsaamer, in t h e new W W C)s sarkWtlon ,wR"lla"rPl esumbirz ~airzrg on t h e Qp changem I.;, r e f l a t he long run could omet t he p r o m d load, Any bui& in mmeRor makeup may be r q u i r d and iaosta!il%cr to o*et the irr-duaive infnuenw of Vinwrs pump,

% fmm the * r e options given by Fe,fl&BG to adclr- this problem of t h e evev ending demand for more enere in t he saLCeh Okanagan , which one wcbuid be of the m a t long lasting the mo%t pnduaive and have the clksaraaeristis on which to build in t he B&ure* ?

Option one is out due to aBI som of reamns, it may k the chea will m 8 eveworae deasiy tin t he future. !"(,is the worn of c h o l ~ , ,

Option W0 sounds promising, we would have a b u t "ehe =me protmon as we do now bM the wmc@ wuid be doubid but....

OmSon Wo is out u s a&"lh%h this applimtion is datd W o b r l2kr 2005 a qastion was p8am by Man Wa@, an Irstewener* to FO~ISBC and it went Bike this:

if t h e new p r o m a Dine fmm the Oliver Terminal to t h e new East on were at 63kVs how may yeam out would ForLBBC

63 kV Imp to adwuately supply t h e greater area ";D

The answer was da td Oaoka 13h 2005 one day a-FIer Phis dwrrment was s u b m M d by Fo@PlisBC and I do n& know who was t h e ~ m o n who answers th& qrsstion but t h e answer aaolanda me,

Page 34: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

The answer is I on Page 5 of the &p&aS hpnd&"lure Plan Rqumt Date Septenrrhr 3CBeh, its the herrrcdra or w page dmumen%

Ma: uTlaere is no p r o m a new line from e&kr the Oliver

Terminal or Bentbey to the new East sumation wahirr "Else f Sve p a = of "lhe Plan, The pm I is to eaend the existing Line 44 from

sukQtiors to the n w east @ suk&tSon (INKMlp subtation "g A AMlrrre transmision imp through "ehe greater O area B goiannd after "re mmpl&ion of "Ie new ESesniiey Teminal SQtion ( 20lLg) and will k admuate For t h e rrllimate toads indim$@ in the Ioad

st sulsmmed wRh the 2006 &@gal Budget Applimticrn as Apwndix 1 of the " 2806 SBP U@a& ","

Another qrretiorr put forth by Alan WaR is featurd under qustiora numka Q18:

ds it the intention to progr~ively change %he Oliver and subQtions to k F a by %38kV instead of the existing 63k"rb, smfling w@h "te East CIS SubBtiona ?

Answer: There are nab plans in t he current 20 9 a r s ~ t e m su~aticrn to 938kVV

16 this be t h e ase, "Ihe why In t he appliwtion on h g e 35 Table 6: &em 2 r%w it Re&rBgB NkMip - Oliver 138kV Transmision Line.?

Why, on Page 5 of the 2006 SDP UMate &em 2-1-1-2 is there reference to 1.38kV buss -lo %we area to %he south from t he new Bentley Terminal 3

Whyv on Page Ib7 of the 20052024 T&D Sfitem DeveHopmenWPlan it say in &ern 2-43, New Bentley Teaminan Station .

Page 35: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

Quote : The 338 kV bus at Bentley will aim terminate a new "n313kV circraa which will supply a new east m y - distribution wurce subtation - Unquote

mge 33 of t h e =me applimtisn reads in Option 2: Saiasra 5.2.2 a t - BQblishr"ng a 18*0 Btm 138 kV aatd transmision iine from existing Oliver Tenmina8 (to be tra wsfena to "Ihe kntiey Teamirrai Station u w n it.. cornpietion ) to NkMMip Su

Option 2 on mge 33 of the appliation also reads : bnstm@icrn of a 63/13kV srr , f a from an

X8.O km " n k V rat& taansmision IIine energizd in&laal& at 63kV from t h e Oliver Tenminai Station to k fransferrd to the p r o p a Bentley Terminal later-

But one day later* "Be answer is that there Rave never W n any plans to mnstnrect even a 63W line &Wen Oliws and bqms for at seast and stretch this a% Ieas"eBI"ve yeam*

This Mil& mrnwny so it may be as much as eight pars &%re they have a busi build another line, and this cheap and nasw Option One will not ake "Ihe

Sraln,

Option W(3r is out use they have answerd that, t h e day a6ger this applimtion was i s u d , FofiisBC has no plans to build a dine as stated in Option two-

That 8eavs us wRh option thbpe-

replacement, for gro sumation and for building the East

Page 36: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

The amorrn& for the Subtation 7*"7,7millSon are t h e =me, just the DiSribartiern upgrade, the price of Option t h r w Is 14-3 million, @ke off 2-2 miiliora for the rehabi!&tion projm of t h e tman&ormes and t h e

ms to be wghin reach and will provide g m sewice until the Line 4 1ffe is reached at which time the new line to East

This would put the SubWtion in an area where it may be s e w i d more easity and the s l e of the r s i aa 'md land of t he old subs&tion will

some 01: the cmt of the move,

"8he appli~tion as p hltd should 5oe- r e f u d use of the conflic="ring sQteri?en& Mth in it. and aRer the srrbmision was made.

FoeisBC has a financial goal to make Option One succ~fu l , regs

They have made referen- to sptem charaaeristim which are Wen@ five yea= in the f&ure wRh mo mention of "1al f aa at the time of aterrrent. Only by mrefuI c r s examination of &he applimtion and the wnssing of the 26306 Qpgal ewnd&ure Plan burrrent was B able to realize that this one dimensional thought pswm by FoaisBC was alive and well-

ForhisBC have wntradiad "$hemselvm as to what thsq pldge to do in the appfimtion which lea- all wm of quwtbns for the kxrmmisicsn to sorl: out, "Pw have made =me Oflions apwaa to k more expnsive to aaain the =me aims- No doubt sommne w@h far kRer ewlght and pseveranre axauld and more rliscrewncie use aRer severai wmks of this reading and reading again i am geEing f i rd . ,

This concluds my input and notes on the applimtion paion and c1ws off Chapter Five-

Page 37: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

"Te more 1 read of this, "$he more it apwars as though this whole appiimtion is Just a t w h n i a l smoke wrwn for the uszwaw-

My wrmption of this situation so fan", Is that FbafiisBC is internst4 sn!y in the Wmrn line, T h q apwar 'to ham corrrplae disremrd for m p B e fwllns, for their f i n a n w or %I; their gmgraphiml ~limpticora is that 8 ibte they wrtorrid p a a pie right thm hommwners r~iclerrw &ont rmm if & meant t h q could s v e a dollar-

That is the nature of t h e k a s t we are aIO facing and & is driven by the dollar- Let it not be s i r 9 that we muss a dent in the 1.2 billion t he mrent mmpsny ma&- in each year-

& Bar as % mn s~ and read "there has W n no rean e ~ o a to just@ any of the pm k exmpt the one which ruins Kirrssher Drive, mere have W n no wnwm shown for "ie =fee of the c%i%izens and raiders& d iret!y a@@a uw the Transformer problem was not consider4 a prbrw- The prior@ was m e t i n g "lhe demand for enera prsentd by t he CdeveI~ping east side aaP Boyc%c)s= and ali else ws *orrtlany,

The easiat and mwt direct ro&e woraid be to mnnect to the 63kV %ine a"sthe n o ~ h e n d of the lake- "%he line wili everrtaaa9Q have to k buiR and this imp conmEo;e worrtd have to be p M on hold until then . In the meantime, if there is another way of wming to a common wnse soldion, it 1 j u s t migh"l. to mnnW 80 line 44 sroe-lh of the Bake on the s&fi of a line to the New Bentley Teaminaim "Tis would al!e,w the Eag 0s Subtation to b o r n e quRe feasible - This is another idea which wuld k considera.

Page 38: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

Chapter Six:

Sakv and al! defirr&"cins thermt

%%w means dfierenf t h i n e to cilmerenl organizaticms, Safe& may k a way of Ige to sira in f@ and sw is d@firaae& the way to avoid i n j u ~ and have a su ul mrwr in an 53isrsdara~ which is inherently dangerous.

Ss vev old and worn, qrripment which a n no longer be Ssted and adjust4 regularly

use R fails when t- $*ems are o p r a t d and annot be put back into wnrriw in a timeiy manner.

The impc=% is that this qu ipmen t am; mu= fainure of the transmision and biigar'baion sptems it SUP^^, or prevent rstoration

ible quipmew damage, ex$ewdd outage f ime, ibQ musing public =few i s u s =

This statement mme from Page 60 of the 2006 apml; Budget Applimtion.

F~fiisS(7: , in t h e a@em@ to I I ~ @ this %few problem is b a d w&hr a long aduorrs task, and when I% is &lid mat should an overhead three phase s m m come toppling to the ground, t he rstoraticsn setem will immdiateiy Qke effm and shu t down the swesn,, this statement mrs be judged by the w m ~ s r i w own admision "iat there is a ibilw this sptem would not s&CI;I down,

That is a safe@ isue ! lt is r epa t4 on Page 63.11 Under "re c i r e u m s ~ n ~ , we mnnoc in any wayv asadme that the

sptem will reaa in the manner whfcl-r wCI% guarant: our %.Few shcrudd some ataSropIRic evenmitre place which wound bdng mwe rr;rr%e 4cC9 the ground in a heavily ~pasia i ld reidentian area,

Page 36

Page 39: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

The tran*rmes in t h e prmeM & ion have &n cerl%id as def-ive and running at a nducd in@& to prevezld failure, Negher one 5s able to mrs)r the ener@ lmd individual& and as such preen& a wrious pmblem,

Until t he Owd is r d u W w that one Bran*omer is able to handle the Imd it will be dniecr81 if n a im V repairs or nepiaeemerrd: of t h e e un&-

Rdercing t he ener@ rquirement sn t he subBtion B the only way to a f f a a solaion lo the problem. It is a problem of ga: magnRrrde,

Forli&BC has a b & 110 tranispormre~~ 350 clmu& breaks, 950 F u s d sw%cgls and elismnna&.

The average age of the transformem and many other devi- e x c d 30 *as*

FoflisKDC must addrw the isue of aging infrastru@ure,

This mnfirms my prceptlsn that the major@ of quipment is reaching the p i n t ohno return in & useful itgem

FofiisBC has 45 transmisiorr ! i n s and 63 terminals and stations, The transmbiczn s~terrr consim of apprraxirnaely 1,6W krn of llne and agrprrprximately 16,OW ~1a- CBwe to a% of t h s e l i n e are more than 30 ~ a r s old,

FofiBBG has approximately %I7 cdS~riblr4ion f a e a consisang of approximate& 5,OW bdm (3F line, 82,000 supma s t r u a u r e and 30,000 081 ni!d di%rlb&ion transformem-

DistribHion su-ining mp&al exwneJ&ura are a q e r i r a %r the aepiammenl of ~ 1 s cr- arms, condaraor and Bransformers, etc that are detenioratd, defaive or oblete- The pnoj in this group are primarib fmusd on mmaiantaining reiiabilw and

Page 40: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

in hi@ dens@ u r b n areas, WO Bmnsformer sraMations, are aimm alwap Imdd abve the rating sf a single tran&ormer- The

to be transfesra to an adjamnt "Iansformer during; maintenan= or hCIure of one of "lhe No tmnsforme~~

The mnfigusatbn at is not urarasrrar, rather the norm for the s@uatisn, What m a k s it more intersting is when M h "ransformers are under ratd k l o w their mpc@m,

In F"rs@&BCs judgement the paob bi t ity of failure of one of the f ran~forrnes is high- % h g e 5 &em 8 05 the 2W6 &p&l kpndRure Plan in rmwns Zca a qarsticdn from the SCUG.

Let me read furZI-rer,

the p r i d of time it Zmk to transwfi and set up me mobile stlbwtion. "The backup transformer at W s t mn only srappv appmximateIy

std 2006 WB k Ioad. "B@s would rear& in aoQtirrg o a a g s for apprmimate& 1,200 of the exkting 4,000 cuaorrrem in rn %n approximately 24 h o u s , This translate into approximate& 1-7 million customer minlr ls of 0 - g ~ - This , Ezrowmr, asurn- the amilabilm of the mobile as mobiia are u d for normal planna maintenance and if that was the s%"luation, the time to ex"rriwte the mobile will add "CCI the omge time.

mobilw wuid prmenl a S W C ~ problem where smm is at a premium, Such could be the satration in where t he remwalsf one transformer is r q l a i r d and another reha b i lb td -

asmges may nM be vew selmive, SO our water sstem may k invralw on one omge and t he swage 5-tern on the other- m m m e r e would be a tm up. For"hisBC d not wan"tthris scene anymore than m do,

Safew means many t h i n s to many wpBem

Page 41: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

Prwenting fa i lu re ereat= va!ue- To demonwate this va!ue9 t h e prevention col a failure of one mwer trarrdormer would sve t h e m r n ~ n y in ~PcIer of $"7OPOC)O. mere are apgmlmateiy 110 traneormes in For"lisBG sfitem, which are ern the average of 38 p a s dd, The lge cycIe of a Trarrgomer is %m *as9 s there is a g W ibilQ that FoflisSC

failura in the rse&ten yeas, Pr~venting3-PItransFc)rmerPailur~ owr the muse of the 1& of the CMMS would pay for the c a t of f he CMMS sstem. it is clear that only a few pfevewld far"furw ju*$ie the mt of the CMMS at $ -7W,84)0-

Wer the wurs of the wst th re flars, FSofiBBC has expalenca apprairrralely ten su on quiprnerrt wndgion relatd omgm. On t h e average* nt l a a a approximate& 3 2 hours, This aWcl.d,

f h s e Qaiiiurw, six of them may have ken iratereptd and preventd by a sk i l ld tmhrriciarr or engisaer* w&h an evb-ive management swem. The f a i l u r s were of a nature that they had some indimtions that there

t he sauation

A c~mprehensive GMMS sptem runs on f b r ~ p t i ~ linm for ukimate ~~ormanrm as the barrrSwicJII-r allows teal mntml and toQI anal*= wwbilRis. No other arrdiarm should k wnsidered, It is immune to EMF and, afier k ing prcsprv iinsalld and protmta, will last for *as*

This will allow r allwtiosr of man ~ w e r , blmoming pmblems and faa action on Remaial Won % h e m e ,

mat wiil mve a considerable amount of time, bliskr mnfidenm in the sptem by the wo&ers and s v e money as t he rerrfl.

A win win sguation for ail,

Page 39

Page 42: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

The PCB grretiocrsn now w m a into t h e d ixusian an %@@ and on "e his subJ@ 1 am wondering why they was such a vehement denial of any such sumance in any sf t h e trans%nmem that were in the sptem,

F"aa~BBC is swsrding $870,000 annually* .,ginning in 2005,- w@h the commenmmenl (oI oil %mplin$ lab tsting and any n rY sngigation measurm taken on insewice, oil-filld disributian apparatus.

FofilsBC has aysproximateiy 32,008 in-sewiw, oii-filld distribMion apmratsrs that do not undergo oil %Wing: as wrl of regular maintenance. Fdeaai Ieglslation is ~ n c l i n g that will squire that ail remaining in sewice quipment wnaining PCB etarrwnlrations greater than 50 ppm must k inventoriedr and regaaaed annually- A rwuiremerrl also @xi= to labl any quipmerrl that is found to msrtaira ccrnwntrations greater than 50 ppm. To m e t thse rqrairemene, Foir48BC muS f i ~ t determine the eoncentrations in each d ~ i ~ e -

Sadev is of the greatwt mncem, even if it ie@s!atA, ry to prevent

any so^ of wrm@ct and undoaabtdly the Workmen" smpns t io r r h i r c a have pmtwols in ptam for the handiing of dangerous materials such as thee*

"There are enough probiems facing empi when afld to paS=oam remdiai a@liofa s c h e m e , in the dark, in the wet and coICd, wah [ale or no Mck UP and no dwumentation to Padi b c k oar for information so badly rm&M to make dwisive wrrwt dwisisrsaa

should be awarcld m4aBs for bsrave~~ abve and Myond the mII of job dwcription-

My thoughts go to a vev teEe memorandram Bmcam a field p m o n to his It iep amie but the meaning and rn gw are ~Iear and I know how h e must ha* felt kmuse I have been in his sffuation also,

Page 43: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

The Memo lmb something like this ::

breakem out- You have to wo& on them in place, which is ve8y tight, or rrnrbol. and drag out,

2) Vew hard 80 isolate. n W Bine crw to wrallel f a e s in the field,

3) b g house are old and not weafhepmf- & w by p ia r r r s the wising is all over the pitam, and t he relaying ( gamtmtion) is archaic-

5) Verl, slow at clearing f a u b by tMay3 twhnoies@ and we have no idea of t h e rating of the breaker

6) We have no maintenance manuals on th

Regards Jim O'B Fop"iisBC, your w m p n y has a long hard soad to go to get this

sptesrrr of y o u s s fe enoum for m p l e like Jim 0% to work on. It will be one tough rwd. Get your CMMS UP and running on @ a s f i k r * place p u r C)a urrb and all wntroI pin& and go &om there, Your own words put dorlh a g W b u s i n s mw and it should be fist prior&-

FoP4iBC should alwa* put =fee fist, and the ba6m iine, where it shouid be, at the M,

Page 41,

Page 44: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

The p ing memo mme from a v a o n who w o & 4 on the Kaleden Suktatiorn rment& and indimts just how much of a problem

as ii ble,

The priw a compny p~ for such a piicy is evident by "Ie mrrd&isn they find themslvw in at this time regading subta'lion quiprnerr8.

%few SaFeV at a!! meaning to dweresrl: p p l e , under elfierent c i r c l m m ~ n w and at t i m a this was a qust ion which was circulating in the mind of Jim 0% at Kaleden that day orr O a 3d 2W5-

No pa-, no marzuak, no e"rmreme~)tatic~n~ no hisoris, no help and liRie enmuragement, mm and pi falling awse clue to age, lack of moneys lack of in t e r s t , lack of Safe@-

Sakv at any

Page 42,,,

Page 45: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

Chapter *wen:

The Daision and all that wRh it :

There are hsimlb thre options sn the Wble for d i ~ u s i o n , =me have W n rndgi4 by later sWtemenB and &he@ wMradiad in tmi-

mere are wrne hsic gmblems that n d t h e rqariremenl for ancldher ssrMa1:ion in the e)s

ion, the lack of preotaisn and t h e l imRa size, r q u i r ~ inrrrrdiate miiakns.

Moving the ssr uesll removan; of a v e ~

ra2 danger, should be wnsiderd as a primary gml,

ThB is cwerd under Option ""b"rm pbEt foeh by FofiisBG in t h e appllation-

The rrrentiorrd imp wnfiguration wuId not k a faail" as this would not be r q u i r d until the Iine dmm Oliwr is boik in the far f&ure,

The answer to a qra-iorr p a Bo@h by Alan WaR remrrling me date of rrrsnarraalon of thb line -From Oliwr indimtw mat t h b !line was nwer considerd until at ileast 2014, or byond,

uentw m d M w Option Two, which is to run a Dine from Oliver as pafl of t he Pmjm-

Option TWO wiii reiy on mnnmion to Urre 4-4 f a until lCklis new wurm from Oliver is wmgale"64 in 201LA3,

Page 43

Page 46: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

Option TWO pr~vitbs for the mwtruaorr of a sra SuBtafi~n than the W s t Subation wuld handle at

Option Two would k the rrrm deirable fmm the long term view as bt did provide a line from Oliver and wm tt t h e cbpp@usr@ to Ssing fibre -e)ptic a b l e for the CMW sptem to pmvide moalern ccorrlrol and suweifiane for the s@em at t h e East 0s

& mentiond More, this Option TWO should be rti7MHid to allow For a 60kV Dine to b wrrSrrra4 to the rrcrfih end of the & b k e to m n n a Une M ad: that wlnt Th& would negate " Ihe nm ell Kinssher DAw. The S u b OSne allsQ would allow the CMMS s@em to k Mught to "else new Ea& Su btatiosl-

it would allow the mmpany to say wRhin @s commffmerr.l nerl to build thb Iine from Oliver to until allowd in t he fism% -an of 2011.

This stub muid "Bhe be come me of t he Oliver line and defray m& in mat mannea: ! am sun"@ that %e prCe of iine materials will have ineread sign8imr"lt@ by the time the nw fine will be sla%M for cors~rueion-

At that time the noeh end of the b k e wilf pmbbly show signs of rquiring a thlrel suktation to toea that area 618 N u m b r 22 Rwd. "The juraaion of "che Irnr~) l i ne onto Line 44 will

phy which mn then be instlgatd at that time

future dwelopment

Option One is mia& a shoe term quick Fix at minimum cat, The baa ahat the trandormem in t he old SukQticm were even king mnsiderd to prmide an ears eraera lwd while rxmstrrraion of t h e East 0s Sumation indimts a eemin r m k l e n ~ ,

Page 47: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

The mnsideration of running 60kV , thre p h a s , on fim fim PmB pis thrcrrrm a rsiderrlial area, wRhr"n t h i m fiw .Fm or lm of w p l ~ rwidence show a mmplajte disregard k r the sfm and wela king of the cuSomem that p y p u for your %mice.

There will be , no doubt1 other mrrsicferations, such as the magnetic fields , chara@e&tic of wwea l ine wll! be w l c 4 by @he=

in this slabjw than I am,

In the par 2011, qu&e

tian which make Option: One ewn more of a quick Ci and a wage of 2006 funds.

Option One is j u g not easilale under the smw conSrain&.

B would invEe the m e m k s of the Cklilgis mmmbiorr to view the ro&e sf Option One and vim the wle marzn i rrdiwto~ g if

there any S i l l there 1 a h view the schml, ( no wOe m & b n ma&es found ) there again, the sk?a>awt

If FofiTsBC insist u p n swnding Wo million dalias to fix t h e W W ion "h"rart&omes problem plus a garrugad net problem

repair, theso t h q s%osu!el @ve mnsicleration to the bilawlng

Page 48: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

provide for a f M to EaS while the East 0s mmiirzg on nine.

mnstruc"r a 6OkV line Fmm t he EaS SerM8tion to Une 444 nclrdDa of *he h k e and canna at a wnvenient win% This will provide for t h e wnnmion to Oliver in 2011-20Q when t h e line is buiR.

mere is a g a demand for errere at oaln end rsl" the @ b k e which would n

This wnfiguratiola would give you f ulii imp mn2r01 when & will be available, i-em 204-1 or 20U when the Olker line Is bug&-

We do not have to mrrsiden the 238W uw when askd sm%wlly abu t "its IbllW* the answer was that t h e corrmpt was 9 i i i Wenw or so p a s in the future and had no baring aaan the p

We do not W- to kwp in mind this imp mnmpt that FoabBC in their appliation OnsbB is v&al, uw , urrlil t h e Oliver line is brriEl, In the p a s 2011-2012, the qu strialq, amdemlc. Both Cls subations will k bed on a ""Radial" , i s . on t h e end of t h e line and wig8 have no Imp mpabil%is until the 201%-2032.

w have actual@ Wo cho iw are bar as i a n @$her w&h t h e information, mnstemation and Indignation 09: t he I

Page 46

Page 49: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

C h o i e One : Move the p nt, oad k a t up scr on orrQ of the

Use the new qu ipmen l ode rd %r the East O plus all the mosr&or and wntml quipmenl and build a nw sarbtantial, W& SubQtbn in the Incl;rrstfial Area where It slaoutd have h n conSrears"r~ was age,,

Run a fikr-asptle line from Oliver to sta~on*

side and f@ t h e Omd ~"qrtiremen& from "Ihe new 1

This great amousrl: of money US^ "FC)r underground f@ ac musway is only sraerr-liond in Option Thrw, alllrorrm Option One worr;!d have the =me amoiirsr8 of w i s s running thmsrgh mere,

"Tq would be b t h mming Fmm me W s t SukWtisn, t he ion and t h e clmerenee in lenekr.

l"ha"lkrewnw has b h l a e r d me sinm I f i ~ t rmd through the Projrn-

Should the projw rquire an addgion of a mmbl;e generator to supply ~ w e r for a SW%C len@h of time, t h e wt Incurrd would have to be put down to the prim of doing busin-,

In the final ana obBirr a soum of 60h for the srrb@tia>n would i n v o k rnlnirnlrm e-FFofi as %e wsrGmaiorr would be mainly rural and w&hin the pro easement

Page 47-.

Page 50: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

Option Two m d f i d providing Just t he stub line to mnn- Line 4-4- at the n0flI-a end of the bke,

Ta considea anflhing GI to 0F);Ion One would k agaiiila all the m g l s wishes who rside in this area, We have had m e i n @ whereby %he indignation and anger haw Mila over to a p i r r l that is quite rwealing Plea* srOamd that the R i n s ~ h e r Ddm Reiden& and asmCatd Srwt areas are nM a m u d @&hem,

There haw W n nurnemras m p l e who ha* swken to me ab r r l the tsapmsenl disregard "Ilre Gr>mpany ( F"o@isB@) h;s% shown for t h e we!! king of the rsitllrerrB. Emn e W a of apprwch the b n d )zrcquls&icsn mmmny was sus nd the Pam that t h e m m r ~ n y ( h=:c)@isBC) had clsnwrrientb negl-a to inform the aS l i lMs a m m i s i o n as "ecr j u 3 what was goSng on. The faa that the FofikBG ~"epraeratative~ who was a majar figure in ahis sheme, was and had full! wntrols8 zbdulirrg and k n w what was aiiDou"l0 "lanspire, neg!Wd 80 inform me can the impnding plaemenl of the wle mR"lion staks, aRhocogh he a s u r d me that there was to k some wfl of inpa fmm t h e rwiden&. &fore anfllaing was to wnanue,.

OeJliezrr Orre is a ncrn s@r;a,er in any sham or form- I h o p the ~mrurlsicsrr rnerrakm will concur w&h Zl\e raiden& of

Ki w@shea &)rim to this comclcrsiOm~ of wwice and mairrtenanm, appararaw, rdwircnating land

valsas and the I s than aewptable dimrrce 'la the amd. On the mw of my reldenm me writer line is i a than semrrteo from "ce pOe and I- than five h t to the rmds age, t he only thing sew rating f hem

!k at a b & .F"we f e t in wish, me brr"ln"$errlranm to my nder t h i m S@ fmm t h e pie and the hous nea dma is

There is no rmm For a monstsmia, such as FofiisBC would piace in my front pd-

Page 51: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

"Tis pmblem will be pia& in the hands CIP the m e m k m 06 the BrRlslr Wlarrrbia MilRls &mmision for %heir wruml, disrrsion and dwision,

I a n only h a p mat =me of my pleadins that I Ram made in this Bong wind@ epMle do not fall on deaf WB and tha& mpeIC, Oike shes on this Kirrmsher Drive p& our trust into the hands of this Urrrrrrision to arrhe at a j u g and qrrhble solrrllon M a on the h& and real@- placd kfare !& 7: all other p p l e w h a t m s their view or in ters& may prove to be-

The Oong term sol&ilart sems to fawur a visiona~ p abie to read and deipher the f&ure. E m s and values smm to k m duerent now*.

Wrceptions:: We mn how for t h e and premre for t he wow., It

though big b u s i n s holds the u p ~ r hand and we have exampis of that at hand with the CNR probiem, Tenus lalrcarrr dBpute, Big MX Stor=,

ail rwerrl arrbals, ail strr'ving to bring the industrie to a mmmon denominator-

Wlaeher & be the [OW& or not is a rrraaer of debate but one thing wmmsn to all is the aaempt to g@ the bi@& Mng for the small& buck, and, so Br the CNR ms to be winning in their abllo to k e p their trains off the track,

Telers has srs%@d in dwimating its WO* %rw and will be yeam rmowring 9H ever-

m line le at t h e exprrs of t he mr SOUIS toSITng in the stor-

at aim& mlmCmum rat= . ForlisBC, whme purchase of t he W& Kmtenay Power Proj-

muS have Wra a great leap of fa&h in somwne" mind, & an old man, & kave me breath!- !

Page 52: C3-2 · Osoyoos B.C. December 8th 2005 Commision Order G 114 05 Final Summary of Objections and Recommendations Denis Hull 8310 Kingfisher Drive Osoyoos B.C. on the East Osoyoos Substation

This has &n one tough Joazrrrw for an old guy like me,

MY are sore from reading in wsrsistent& cold Imm wo&ing; on my word p r thing clown in my w!d bawmerrl,

"81s mmp&er has a h d ha be of "%r>rge%ing t h i n s , I know what a s i Hag "C-;e time, it won% turn on, the other hag, it won't turn OFF=

When I go to prirrt tkjns, f h w are nwen the %me as what the scrwn mey should be,

1 have gone thrraum a whole regme of miour w% ~r the pAnter* R won% pliant u n l s all t he s la are fills, [ Another big arrrpainy id-)

Have gone tf"arou@ Z\aro and ha% bb~nEJ1- of mws and haw @en up tying lo get email @ems off of t he n e t Hald the time t h q mu= t h e

go into a ciear and lim-

So I am right up to here w&h this th ing It may do t h i n e which ]us% a few yeas ago wouid be mnsiclerd magic bM rrrm of the time it mrn k downdght arneFy and a fw t ima I %rave g& my %Men vund sldge out to make a slight adjustment but rea9izd B didn"l ha* t h e arerssla to swing it I

b re w&h me, if this epistle ms a IWIe disjaintd and unclear, w@h a lack of memow or mheaenm, join t h e club, you wiii eventually get there p u w g but in the meantime j u g aeaIT% that % ha* done my b t w%h what I had and that is what this whole "Ilriog aa r ld o& as, if $rg)u

a e m e m h r t h e quaint ~yi,r"n@ r>"F the FofibBC repreenbtive. f am f i n i s h a , m k r 7th 2W5 (Anyone a e m e m k r that

Sunday morning In 19413)