By: Sustainable Dry Feet Inc.

Case 3Approaching Stakeholders to Invest in Urban Regeneration Projects:

A fact-sheet construction for projects appraisal in WATERgraafsmeer

By:Sustainable Dry Feet Inc.

Utrecht, 29th October 2010

Index

Introduction

Who we are?

Project description

Our Problem Understanding

Multidisciplinary Approach

Results

Governance

Fact Sheet

Discussion

Who we are? Dry Feet Inc.

David Castro Master Student Sustainable Development – EPM, Portuguese Bachelors degree in Economics. Working experience as international financial

auditor and assistant.

Laia Fayet Master Student Sustainable Development – Business Management, Spanish Four years business and supply chain management expertise. Previous Master in

Chemical Engineering. Love traveling and knowing different cultures

Marc Leijtens Master Student Sustainable Development – EPM, Dutch BcS in environmental studies at the University of Utrecht, specialization in

environmental policy and governance

Sanderine van Odijk

Master Student Sustainable Development – EPM, Dutch Bachelor in Psychology; worked in Burkina Faso on solar energy project. Broadly

interested in all sustainability topics and especially the business aspects of sustainability.

Imanol Oquiñena

Master Student Sustainable Development – LEB, Spanish Bachelor in Biology. Loves climbing, playing the drums and listening to good music

Jennifer Stamatelos

Master Student Sustainable Development – EPM, Greek Received a Bachelor's degree in Economics and Environmental Science and has

four years of experience in asset management

Leonardo Verkooijen

Master Student Sustainable Development – EPM, Dutch Bachelors on economics, development studies, and political science.

Project Implementation

Our Problem Understanding

Fact Sheet Construction

Business Case Construction

Governance

Governance

Network, Stakeholders Engagement

PolicyPolicy, Regulations and Funding

Sustainability - Triple Bottom Line EvaluationEconomic Impacts, Turnover, InvestmentsEnvironmental Impacts: Energy, Water, Materials,

Waste, Biodiversity, Land use, Flood prevention, Temperature regulation

Social Impacts: Wellbeing, Quality of Life, Health, Education

Fact SheetsStructure, methodology, key indicators

OUR SCOPE

Project Identification

Multidisciplinary Proposal Approach

1. Governance

3. Triple bottom line Evaluation

2. Policy, Regulation, Funding

Stakeholder Coalition

Stakeholder Analysis

3.1 Economic Impacts

3.2 Environmental Impacts

Energy, Water, Waste, Emissions (household level)

3.3 Social Impacts

ML

SO

LV

DC

JS

Stakeholder indicators

Disciplinary Research Expected Results

Economic indicators

Environmental indicators

Indicators

Social indicators

Urban Regeneration Projects Fact Sheet Recipe

Policy indicators

Eenhoorn Case Study

Urban ecology

LF

IO Indicators

Multiple scenario comparison

Depiction stakeholder network

Project Description

Results - Stakeholder Analysis

Results - Governance

• Stakeholder characteristics: interest and power

• Players (medium power): Waternet, Stadsdeel Oost en Projectbureau Wibaut a/d Amstel

• Player (high power): Ymere

• Subject: Klima Rain

• Position (cooperation of) inhabitants yet unknown

Power versus Interest grid

Recommendations for the Client

• Four courses of action• Cooperation; involving Ymere in the implementation of

energy- and water systems in the Rudolf Dieselbuurt

• Integration and lobbying; integration of small projects into

one coherent program and lobbying towards Ymere to

achieve joint implementation

• Financial participation; involvement of the municipality of

Amsterdam in (partial) financing the implementation costs

• Support and project boosting; implementation of

sustainable energy- and water systems on a large scale

can be achieved by selecting pilot studies that will be

supported and monitored by the municipality to accelerate

the learning process.

Results – Policy, regulations and funding

POLICY SETTING

LEGAL SETTING

Results – Fact Sheet

• End result – A practical, general fact sheet that Waternet can use for future cases.

• Contains indicators for each relevant section.

• Presents these across three scenarios.

PROJECT FACT SHEET - Summary

Project Name Eenhoorn Sustainable Urban Regeneration Project - Rudolf Dieselbuurt housing area

Project and Scenarios Description

Description

Scenario 2 - Exteneded Klima Rain (EKR)

Project Evaluation Indicators Units Baseline Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Relevance/Weight

A. Stakeholders

Name Description Interest

Ymere Housing corporation and project developer active in the Eenhoorn area x x x

Waternet Water supply and water management public agency of the city of Amsterdam x x x

Inhabitants Current and future inhabitants of the houses that will be developed in the

Eenhoorn areax x x

Stadsdeel Oost Public administration of municipality of Amsterdam active in the Eastern part of

the city x x x

Klimarain Civil engineering agency in Weesp that developed an innovative grey water

sysem which saves on water and gas use. x x

Projectbureau Wibaut aan de

Amstel

Project development agency of organized by the Stadsdeel Oost, specifically aimed

at redeveloping the area around the Wibautstraat and the river Amstel, including large parts of the Watergraafsmeer such as the Eenhoorn

areax x x

B. Policy, Regulations and Fundings

B.1 Investment setting favourability -- / - / 0/ + / ++B.1.1 Policy setting favourability -- / - / 0/ + / ++

B.1.2 Legal setting favourability -- / - / 0/ + / ++

Rudolf Dieselbuurt housing area, located within “De Eenhoorn” neighbourhood, is planned to have 160 new reconstructed houses starting from 2012. Main urban regeneration focus is to introduce innovative and efficient solutions to decrease the use of fresh water and energy on residential buildings. At the same time it is

also aimed to increase the rainwater harvesting potential and reduce possible undesired side effects of sewage overloading.

This scenario incorporates and extansion of the basic KlimaRain Solution, adding a sollar collector that is used to provide warm water

and further increase the efficiency of the heat pump generation. Thus, additional energy savings can be achieved

Are they involved?

This scenario tries to depict a situation where each stakeholder will participate in the project without exploring other sustainable solutions. This means that current (or outdated)

methods of urban regeneration could be implemented.

Scenario 1 - Klima Rain (KR) Baseline (Business as usual)

This scenario incorporates the services of the KlimaRain system, which collects rain water and combines it with a heat pump to provide

warming and water that is used in lower quality water demand, such as flushing, washing machines or garden's irrigation,

reducing the energy and water usage in each house. It is a mid-option in terms of adding

C. Tripple Bottom Line Evaluation

1. Economic Impacts

Initial investment Euros xx xx + KR xx + EKR Housing developers

Maintenance costs Euros xx xx + KR replacements xx + EKR replacements Housing developers

Energy and heating Euros xx

xx - 25-30% energy costs - 55% water costs

xx - 40% energy costs - 55% water costs Housing developers

Payback time Years yy yy + 5 years (estimate) yy + 10 years (estimate) Housing developers

Amount of tenants (product differentiaiton) Tenants zz

zz + KR benefits advertisement

zz + EKR benefits advertisement

Housing develpers/ Tentants

Subsidies Euros NA xx xxHousing

develpers/ Tentants

Additional costs Euros xx xx xx Housing developers

Depreciation Euros % per year % per year % per year Housing developers

2. Environmental Impacts

2.1 Natural Resources Usage

Energy Energy consumption (kWh/ year household) xx kWh/ year household

xx*(1- (0,25-0,30) kWh/ year household

xx*(1- (0,40) kWh/ year household

Renewable energy (%) zz % zz + 0,75(25-30) % zz+ 0,75*(25-30) + 10%

Water Usage Potable water consumption (liters/ year household) xx l/ household xx*(1- (0,55) liters / year household

xx*(1- (0,55) liters / year household

Sewage water generation (liters/ year household) NA NA NA

Materials and Waste Materials and Waste impact -- / - / 0/ + / ++ NA NA NA

2.2 Urban ecology

Land Use

Population density Inhabitants/ urbanized areas

xx xx±x xx ±x

Green areas % green areas NA NA NA

Sealed surface % sealed surface NA NA NA

Blue areas % blue areas NA NA NA

Biodiversity

Condit ion of land biot opes Shannon-Weaver Index NA NA NA

Water resources

Qualit y of wat er resources Biological O 2 demand NA NA NA

Flood hazard Probabilit y 1/ 10000 1/ (10000*x) (1/ 10000*x)

3. Social Impacts

Aggregated Social Impacts Qualit at ive Scale (1-5) AVERAGE(E63:E66) AVERAGE(E63:E66) AVERAGE(E63:E66)

Empowerment , Part icipat ion and Access Qualit at ive Scale (1-5) 1-5 1-5 1-5

Housing and Environment al Healt h Qualit at ive Scale (1-5) 1-5 1-5 1-5

Ident it y, Image and Herit age Qualit at ive Scale (1-5) 1-5 1-5 1-5

Social Capit al Qualit at ive Scale (1-5) 1-5 1-5 1-5

D. Potential Risks

Aggregated Social Impacts

Risk assessment Qualit at ive Scale (1-5) 1-5 1-5 1-5

Discussion

• Firstly, any questions? Clarifications?

• Is this the most convincing way of presenting urban regeneration projects and engage stakeholders?

• Suggestions?

THANK YOU!