Top Banner
BY: Connor Hedrick, Makayla Kitzmiller, Emmaline Lamp, and Alex Kidd The Pros and Cons of Medical Research Using Live Animals
13

BY: Connor Hedrick, Makayla Kitzmiller, Emmaline Lamp, and Alex Kidd The Pros and Cons of Medical Research Using Live Animals.

Dec 19, 2015

Download

Documents

Bernard Sharp
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: BY: Connor Hedrick, Makayla Kitzmiller, Emmaline Lamp, and Alex Kidd The Pros and Cons of Medical Research Using Live Animals.

BY: Connor Hedrick, Makayla Kitzmiller, Emmaline Lamp, and Alex Kidd

The Pros and Cons of Medical Research Using Live Animals

Page 2: BY: Connor Hedrick, Makayla Kitzmiller, Emmaline Lamp, and Alex Kidd The Pros and Cons of Medical Research Using Live Animals.

What is animal testing? Animal testing is medical research done on animals. Why do scientists test on animals? Animals get tested on by scientists for research, medical reasons, finding cures, and helping us learn more about humans as well.

Background

Page 3: BY: Connor Hedrick, Makayla Kitzmiller, Emmaline Lamp, and Alex Kidd The Pros and Cons of Medical Research Using Live Animals.

Background for Pros

An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing.

Animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products destined for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and healthcare uses.

Research on living animals has been practiced since at least 500 BC.

Page 4: BY: Connor Hedrick, Makayla Kitzmiller, Emmaline Lamp, and Alex Kidd The Pros and Cons of Medical Research Using Live Animals.

Pro

● Opponents of animal testing say that it is cruel and inhumane to experiment on animals

● alternative methods available to researchers can replace animal testing

● that animals are so different from human beings that research on animals often yields irrelevant results.

● But.., animals are very much like humans, thus the reason why we test on them.

Page 5: BY: Connor Hedrick, Makayla Kitzmiller, Emmaline Lamp, and Alex Kidd The Pros and Cons of Medical Research Using Live Animals.

● Animal testing has enabled the development of numerous life-saving treatments for both humans and animals,

● there is no alternative method for researching a complete living organism

● strict regulations prevent the mistreatment of animals in laboratories.

Pro

Page 6: BY: Connor Hedrick, Makayla Kitzmiller, Emmaline Lamp, and Alex Kidd The Pros and Cons of Medical Research Using Live Animals.

Main Points for Pros ● Animal testing has helped save many lives ● Animals themselves have benefited from the

testing. ● Animals are much like humans

Page 7: BY: Connor Hedrick, Makayla Kitzmiller, Emmaline Lamp, and Alex Kidd The Pros and Cons of Medical Research Using Live Animals.

How Has Animal Testing Helped?

Every time a new vaccination for a virus comes it has already been tested and invented with the help of animal research labs. ● Penicillin ● Breast Cancer ● Blood Transfusion ● Asthma .. and more

Page 8: BY: Connor Hedrick, Makayla Kitzmiller, Emmaline Lamp, and Alex Kidd The Pros and Cons of Medical Research Using Live Animals.

Definition of Terms

● Toxicity- Is the degree in which a substance can damage an organism.

● Biomedical- Of or relating to both biology and medicine.

● Proponents- A person who advocates a theory, proposal,or project.

Page 9: BY: Connor Hedrick, Makayla Kitzmiller, Emmaline Lamp, and Alex Kidd The Pros and Cons of Medical Research Using Live Animals.

Background for Cons

According to Human Society International animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food/water deprivation, infliction of burns and other wounds, etc.

Animals are very different from humans. The anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences make animals poor models for humans.

Page 10: BY: Connor Hedrick, Makayla Kitzmiller, Emmaline Lamp, and Alex Kidd The Pros and Cons of Medical Research Using Live Animals.

Cons

Dr. Donald Ingber , a biological engineer at Harvard University, has developed an artificial lung on a microchip to replicate the functions of a working body. These functions include breathing and blood flow. This increases the potential of new ways to test certain medications without the expense and torture of living creatures.

Page 11: BY: Connor Hedrick, Makayla Kitzmiller, Emmaline Lamp, and Alex Kidd The Pros and Cons of Medical Research Using Live Animals.

Main points for Cons

● 95% of drugs passed by animal tests are immediately discarded as useless or dangerous to humans

● Less than 2% of human illness (1.16%)● Animal tests may mislead researchers into

ignoring potential cures and treatments.

Page 12: BY: Connor Hedrick, Makayla Kitzmiller, Emmaline Lamp, and Alex Kidd The Pros and Cons of Medical Research Using Live Animals.

Definition of Terms

Anatomic: Relating to body structure.Metabolic: Relating to basically any organic function.Cellular: Relating to cells.

Page 13: BY: Connor Hedrick, Makayla Kitzmiller, Emmaline Lamp, and Alex Kidd The Pros and Cons of Medical Research Using Live Animals.

Works Cited

● Burrel, Teal. "Can We Eliminate Animals from Medical Research?." Nova Next. Nova, 07 Aug 2013. Web. 20 Oct 2014.

● "Medical benefits." Speaking of research. UWmadison, 20 oct 2014. Web. 20 Oct 2014.● Murnaghan, Ian. "Using animals for testing." About animal testing. About animal testing, 16 10

2014. Web. 16 Oct 2014.

● "Should animals be used for Scientific or Commercial testing." Animal testing pros and cons. N.p., 08 10 14. Web. 16 Oct 2014.