Top Banner
1 Business analysis Concepts 2008 revision
122
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: businessanalysis.ppt

1

Business analysis

Concepts

2008 revision

Page 2: businessanalysis.ppt

2

References

Making the most of your tax accountsJohn Warrington Milk Development Council

Financial & Management AccountingPauline Weetman Financial Times/Pitman

Applied Farm ManagementJ Turner and M Taylor BSP

Business analysis with ExcelConrad Carlburg QUE

Using your accountsFamily Farm Series ATB

Financial Management for Farmers and Rural Managers Martin F Warren Stanley Thornes Interpreting Company Reports and Accounts G. Holmes and A. Sugden Prentice Hall

Page 3: businessanalysis.ppt

3

Comparative analysis

Page 4: businessanalysis.ppt

4

Comparative analysisTeam MT PTS TRS CON PEN DG YC RC

  New Zealand 5 327 48 36 5 0 2 0

  South Africa 7 278 33 25 21 0 3 0

  France 7 227 27 19 18 0 2 0

  Australia 5 225 31 20 8 2 2 0

  Argentina 7 209 23 14 18 4 3 0

  Wales 4 168 23 16 7 0 0 0

  England 7 140 12 7 17 5 1 0

  Fiji 5 134 16 12 10 0 3 0

  Scotland 5 129 15 15 8 0 1 0

  Tonga 4 89 9 7 10 0 3 1

  Italy 4 85 8 6 11 0 3 0

  Samoa 4 69 5 4 12 0 1 0

  Ireland 4 64 9 5 2 1 2 0

  Japan 4 64 7 4 7 0 0 0

  USA 4 61 7 4 6 0 4 0

  Canada 4 51 6 3 5 0 1 0

  Georgia 4 50 5 5 5 0 2 0

  Romania 4 40 5 3 3 0 1 0

  Portugal 4 38 4 3 3 1 1 0

  Namibia 4 30 3 3 2 1 0 1

http://www.rugbyworldcup.com/statistics/season=2007/type=Points/team=0/statistics/index.html

Page 5: businessanalysis.ppt

5

Comparative analysis

A comparison of results with other information sources

Internal previous years accounts current budgets

External Independent surveys

Page 6: businessanalysis.ppt

6

Comparative analysis

Comparison has to be on a “like for like” basis

Farm Income debt free tenant farmer without salaried

management Management and Investment Income Net Farm Income

Page 7: businessanalysis.ppt

7

Management and Investment Income

The reward for the farmer’s (and spouse) management and interest on the tenant’s capital employed on the farm

Page 8: businessanalysis.ppt

8

Management and Investment Income

+Overdraft interest

+Mortgage interest

+Management fee

-Notional rent

less

TPLA profit/loss

REVENUE

Closing valuation

EXPENDITURE

Opening valuation

MII

equals

Overdraft interest, Mortgage interest and Management fee will have been included in EXPENDITURE and are deductions which reduce Profit. By adding them back to profit the deduction is cancelled and has no effect on the measure of output (MII).

Notional rent is an additional deduction to convert all farms to a tenanted basis. This allows for ‘like for like’ comparisons

Deducting notional rent from profit reduces the measure of output (MII).

Page 9: businessanalysis.ppt

9

Management and Investment Income (example)

+Overdraft interest

+Mortgage interest

+Management fee

-Notional rent

less

TPLA profit/loss

REVENUE

Closing valuation

EXPENDITURE

Opening valuation

MII

equals

£20 000

£5 000

Includes £5 000 overdraft

£25 000

£100 000 £80 000

- £5 000

+ £5 000

Effect on MII is £ 0

Page 10: businessanalysis.ppt

10

Net Farm Income

The return to farmer and spouse on tenant type capital for their labour and management

Calculated as if all farms are tenanted

Page 11: businessanalysis.ppt

11

Overhead costs NFI vs MII vs Profit NFI MII Profit

Regular labour and NI Physical labour farmer and spouse Unpaid family labour Paid management Rent and rates Notional rent Machinery depreciation Machinery running and repairs Interest Miscellaneous (including office costs, accountant, telephone, insurance, membership fees)

Page 12: businessanalysis.ppt

12

Comparative analysis

Gross Margins Gross margin per head (GM per hd) Gross margin per hectare (GM per ha)

Overheads Overhead cost per hectare Overhead costs per £100 output Overhead costs as a proportion of gross

margin

Page 13: businessanalysis.ppt

13

Gross Margin per head to Gross Margin per hectare

Gross Margin per head (£/hd)

X

Stocking rate (no./ha)

=

Gross Margin per hectare (£/ha)

Page 14: businessanalysis.ppt

14

Proportional analysis

Assessment of technical and financial efficiency of the business

Costs are expressed as a % of total output

Commonly used for dairy herd analysis

Page 15: businessanalysis.ppt

15

Proportional analysis example

Your figures % Top 25%£ actual

Output 300,000 100% 100%

Variable costs 100,000 33% 34%GROSS MARGIN 200,000£ 67% 66%

Labour 55,000 18% 8%Power and machinery 15,000 5% 7%Property 22,000 7% 5%Sundries 23,000 8% 3%Interest 16,000 5% 5%Rent 5,000 2% 3%Depreciation 24,000 8% 7%TOTAL FIXED 160,000£ 53% 38%

PROFIT 40,000£ 13% 28%

Page 16: businessanalysis.ppt

16

Unit cost of production

Used when large proportion of output from one source

Dairy production Output and costs divided by total litres

produced Beef production

Output and costs divided by total kg meat produced

Page 17: businessanalysis.ppt

17

Unit cost of production (1)

Dairy gross margin (unit cost basis)

Yield (litres per cow) 6000Output £ per cow p per litre

Milk 1080 18.0Calf 50 0.8

Replacements -103 -1.7Total 1027 17.1Variable costs

Concentrate 173 2.9Sundries 140 2.3

Forage 84 1.4Total 397 6.6GROSS MARGIN 630 10.5

Page 18: businessanalysis.ppt

18

Reductionalist theory

Break down results into individual components

Allows physical and financial analysis to proceed

Page 19: businessanalysis.ppt

19

Sensitivity analysis

Analyse effect of change (in advance) on enterprise profitability

Sensitive items cause large changes e.g. commodity prices

Insensitive items cause small changes e.g. vet and med, sundries

sensitivity

resp

on

se

Page 20: businessanalysis.ppt

20

Sensitivity analysis

input

ou

tpu

t

less sensitive

more sensitive

response

Page 21: businessanalysis.ppt

21

Sensitivity analysis example

Cow yield 6000 litres Milk price 16 ppl 100 cows in herd Vet and Med £15 per cow

Assess the effect of 10% change in milk price vs Vet and Med

Page 22: businessanalysis.ppt

22

Sensitivity analysis – change in margins

Milk± 10% x 16ppl x 6000 litres x 100 cows

= ± £9600 Vet. and Med.

± 10% x £15 per hd x 100 cows

= ± £150

Page 23: businessanalysis.ppt

23

Business analysis

Methods

Page 24: businessanalysis.ppt

24

“….published accounts are utterly and absolutely useless….”

Clive JenkinsUnion Leader

Quote

Page 25: businessanalysis.ppt

25

Purpose of business analysis

Identify strengths and weaknesses Is the business sustainable?

Short term Cash flow, Operational requirements

Long term Profitability, Equity

Page 26: businessanalysis.ppt

26

Core analysis

Profit Capital Cash

Page 27: businessanalysis.ppt

27

Analysing profit

PROFIT

EXPENDITURE

REVENUE

OPENING VALUATION

CLOSING VALUATION

Page 28: businessanalysis.ppt

28

Why does a business need a profit?

Profit provides for:- Personal drawings Taxation Repayment of borrowed money Replacement of machines Investment or expansion purposes

Page 29: businessanalysis.ppt

29

Profit sufficiency

Profit requirements are specific to a business

A business with “profit sufficiency” provides adequate cover for personal and investment needs

Page 30: businessanalysis.ppt

30

Profit sufficiency example

PROFIT requirement remainder

Personal drawings 10 000 50 000

Taxation 5 000 40 000

Repayment of borrowed money 7 000 35 000

Replacement of machines 20 000 28 000

Investment or expansion purposes 3 000 8 000

PROFIT SUFFICIENCY 5 000

PROFIT

Page 31: businessanalysis.ppt

31

Analysing Profit

Have you a profit or a loss ? Is the profit sufficient ? Does profit cover private drawings ? How was the profit earned ? Are there extraordinary items ?

Page 32: businessanalysis.ppt

32

Profit does not cover private drawings

Private drawings and taxation Lifestyle?

Page 33: businessanalysis.ppt

33

How was profit earned ?

Sales Costs Valuations Depreciation

Level of investment

What are the main contributory elements?

Page 34: businessanalysis.ppt

34

Sales example

Item (Year 1) £

Finished lambs 35000

Store lambs 5000

Cull ewes 1800

Wool 500

Breeding stock 1200

TOTAL 43500

Item (Year 2) £

Finished lambs 27000

Store lambs 15000

Cull ewes 1500

Wool 700

Breeding stock 2400

TOTAL 46600

Page 35: businessanalysis.ppt

35

Analysis overall

salesin change % 100

£Year1

1Year 2Year

salesin increase %13.7100

43500£

43500£46600£

A negative value would indicate a decrease in sales

Page 36: businessanalysis.ppt

36

Individual component analysis

Year 1 Year 2 % changeFinished lambs 35000 27000 -22.9%

Store lambs 5000 15000 200.0%

Cull ewes 1800 1500 -16.7%

Wool 500 700 40.0%

Breeding stock 1200 2400 100.0%

TOTAL 43500 46600 7.13%

Is this misleading?

Page 37: businessanalysis.ppt

37

Proportional analysis of sales (Year 1)

Wool1%

Cull ewes4%

Breeding stock

3%

Finished lambs81%

Store lambs11%

Item £

Finished lambs 35000

Store lambs 5000

Cull ewes 1800

Wool 500

Breeding stock 1200

TOTAL 43500

Page 38: businessanalysis.ppt

38

Proportional analysis of sales (Year 2)

Wool2%

Cull ewes3%

Breeding stock

5%

Finished lambs58%

Store lambs32%

Item £

Finished lambs 27000

Store lambs 15000

Cull ewes 1500

Wool 700

Breeding stock 2400

TOTAL 46600

Page 39: businessanalysis.ppt

39

Sales and Costs

Breakdown into physical and financial aspects

How do they compare to last year? How do they compare to budget? How do they compare to others? What are the main contributory

elements?

Page 40: businessanalysis.ppt

40

Comparative time frame

Sales

Costs

currentaccounts budgets

-1-2-4 -3

Sales

Costs

Sales

Costs

Sales

Costs

Sales

Costs

Sales

Costs

Sales

Costs

Sales

Costs

more accurate

less accurate

more accurate

less accurate

Page 41: businessanalysis.ppt

41

Valuations

Are they realistic? Retained or unsold livestock increase

Closing Valuation and Profit Knock on effect for following year Valuations are an unsustainable

source of profit

Page 42: businessanalysis.ppt

42

Valuation as a source of Profit

Revenue 100 000 Expenditure 100 000

Closing valuation

35 000Opening valuation

25 000

Revenue - Expenditure 0

Change in valuation (CV-OV) + 10 000

PROFIT 10 000

Page 43: businessanalysis.ppt

43

Depreciation and investment (1)

Investing in machinery and buildings increases depreciation charge

High depreciation costs indicate high levels of investment

Low depreciation charges indicate low levels of investment

Page 44: businessanalysis.ppt

44

Depreciation and investment (2)

High depreciation could indicate over investment

High depreciation could indicate compensatory investment

Low depreciation might trigger compensatory investment in the future

Page 45: businessanalysis.ppt

45

Depreciation vs investment

time

£

Depreciation

Maintenance

Total

Total costs greater than original costs - reinvest

Page 46: businessanalysis.ppt

46

Are there extraordinary items?

Unexpected items of revenue Rare (windfall)

Unexpected items of expenditure Common

building repairs high replacement rate Labour

Likely to increase with uncertainty in weather patterns

Page 47: businessanalysis.ppt

47

Analysing gross margins

A measure of enterprise productivity Physical efficiency Financial efficiency

Page 48: businessanalysis.ppt

48

Relationship between Profit and Gross Margin

Profit

Gross Margin

Fixed Costs (Overheads)

Variable Costs

Enterprise Output

Other Enterprise Gross Margins

Page 49: businessanalysis.ppt

49

Physical and Financial analysis

Comparative Per ha Per £100 working capital Per 100 hours labour

Published information

Page 50: businessanalysis.ppt

50

Strengths of gross margins

Simple to construct and use Useful tool for business planning Indicates inter enterprise strength and

weakness

£100 GM per ha

£50 £25

Page 51: businessanalysis.ppt

51

Weaknesses of gross margins

Does not produce profit figure Overheads excluded

Gross margin must be interpreted in relation to overhead cost

Profit is not proportional to gross margin Does not allow for compensatory or

detrimental relationships between enterprises

Page 52: businessanalysis.ppt

52

Profit is not proportional to gross margin

Gross Margin

Fixed Costs

Profit

Lower Fixed Costs result in higher proportion of Gross Margin as Profit

Gross Margin

Fixed Costs Profit

Higher Fixed Costs result in lower proportion of Gross Margin as Profit

Page 53: businessanalysis.ppt

53

Scatter graph analysis

Total Overhead costs £ per ha

Gro

ss M

arg

in £

per

ha

HI

HI

LO

LO

Highly profitable business

Less efficient business

Efficient business

Loss making business

INTENSIV

E

EXTENSIVE

Page 54: businessanalysis.ppt

54

Dairy herds FBS 2003/04

AVG GM

AVG FC

PROFITABILITY

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

2200

1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000

Page 55: businessanalysis.ppt

55

Constructing the breakeven line

Total Overhead costs £ per ha

Gro

ss M

arg

in £

per

ha

Breakeven line

where

Gross Margin=Overheads

(0,0)

(500,500)

(750,750)

Page 56: businessanalysis.ppt

56

GM >Overheads = PROFIT

Zone of profitability

Total Overhead costs £ per ha

Gro

ss M

arg

in £

per

ha

Breakeven line

where

Gross Margin=Overheads

Overheads >GM = LOSS

Page 57: businessanalysis.ppt

57

Breakeven does not usually pass through the averages

Overheads

Gro

ss M

argi

n

Overheads

Gro

ss M

argi

n

Overheads

Gro

ss M

argi

n

OverheadsG

ross

Mar

gin

Overheads

Gro

ss M

argi

n

Business results

GM per ha & Overheads per ha

Page 58: businessanalysis.ppt

58

Coping with uncertainty

normal distribution

increased variability

Less values near the mean

Greater proportion of distribution away from the mean

Unpredictable behaviour of biological, physical and financial systems

Page 59: businessanalysis.ppt

59

Analysing Capital

Capital is a resource The balance sheet provides a

snapshot of capital in a business Net worth is an indication of the size

the business and the amount of resource available

Page 60: businessanalysis.ppt

60

Establishing long term stability and viability

The potential to survive adverse trading conditions

Sufficient proprietor capital Potential to raise creditor finance

Solvency Favourable equity ratios

Page 61: businessanalysis.ppt

61

Establishing long term stability and viability (1)

The ability of a business to meet its trading commitments on time

Liquidity Capacity of the business to make an

adequate return on capital employed Return on capital

Page 62: businessanalysis.ppt

62

Establishing long term stability and viability (2)

The ability of a business to generate sufficient profits that cover personal drawings, loan repayment, reinvestment and taxation.

Page 63: businessanalysis.ppt

63

Solvency

The first indicator of balance sheet strength

Assets > Liabilities

Page 64: businessanalysis.ppt

64

Solvency (1)

A solvent and profitable business might not be healthy

Downturn in profits could erode low proprietor capital

Page 65: businessanalysis.ppt

65

Ratio analysis

Short term analysis Liquidity ratio Current ratio Equity ratios

Page 66: businessanalysis.ppt

66

Ratio analysis

Longer term analysis Liquidity ratio Current ratio Owner equity ratio Debt/Equity ratio

Page 67: businessanalysis.ppt

67

Liquidity ratio

The availability of cash in the near future i.e. can short term debts be covered without selling live or deadstock

cash + debtors : creditors + overdraft

ideal ratio 1 : 1

Page 68: businessanalysis.ppt

68

Current ratio

Similar to Liquidity ratio. Can current liabilities be met without selling fixed assets or raising long term loans?

Current assets : Current liabilities

ideal ratio 2 : 1

Page 69: businessanalysis.ppt

69

Current ratio (1)

Acceptable ratio dependent on composition of current assets

A lower ratio may be acceptable if you have a high proportion of cash and debtors (i.e. liquid assets) in current assets as opposed to high proportion of growing crops or stock (i.e. less liquid assets)

Page 70: businessanalysis.ppt

70

A lower Current ratio

Current assetsCash 15000

Debtors 12000Growing crops 5000

Beef cattle 2000Total 34000

Current liabilities 30000

Current ratio 1.1

79%

21%

Current assetsCash 4000

Debtors 3000Growing crops 15000

Beef cattle 12000Total 34000

Current liabilities 30000

Current ratio 1.1

21%

79%

Which is acceptable ?

Page 71: businessanalysis.ppt

71

Current ratio (2)

Low ratios may be acceptable if creditors are willing to wait for payment

Large quantities of underutilized cash sitting in a bank account produce high ratios and indicate poor cash management

Page 72: businessanalysis.ppt

72

Acid test

Highlights liquidity of current assets Might explain low current ratio Identifies the ratio of very high liquid

assets to current liabilities

Page 73: businessanalysis.ppt

73

Acid test (1)

sliabilitie Current

sale for Livestockcrops HarvestedDebtorsCashtest Acid

Page 74: businessanalysis.ppt

74

Acid test (2)

Which are the liquid assets? Some debtors excluded when extended

credit operative Unused overdraft can be considered a

liquid asset Guide ratio 1:1

Page 75: businessanalysis.ppt

75

Factors that affect liquidity

External factors Internal factors

Capital injectionIncrease in creditTax refundGovernment grants

Sale of fixed assetsProfit

LIQUIDITYReduction in credit facilitiesLossesRe-investment in fixed assetsInflation

Tax paymentsCredit repaymentDividendsDrawingsBonuses

+

-

Page 76: businessanalysis.ppt

76

Working capital ratio

Capital required to fund a production cycle

Ratio gives indication of amount of additional WC required to fund increase in sales

Page 77: businessanalysis.ppt

77

Working capital ratio (1)

Sales

sliabilitie Current-assets Current ratio WC

Page 78: businessanalysis.ppt

78

Working capital ratio example

Current assets £110,000 Current liabilities £60,000 Sales £250,000 projected to increase

by £75,000 Calculate change in working capital

Page 79: businessanalysis.ppt

79

Working capital example (1)

250,000

60,000-110,000 ratio WC

20% or 0.2250,000

50,000 ratio WC

Every £100 of additional sales will require £20 additional working capital therefore increasing sales by £75,000 increases working capital requirement by £15,000

Page 80: businessanalysis.ppt

80

Equity ratios

The proportion of a proprietors equity in a business

Exposure of a business to outside creditors

Traditionally high in the land based sector

Page 81: businessanalysis.ppt

81

Be careful with terms

Net Worth

Net Capital

Equity

Page 82: businessanalysis.ppt

82

Equity ratios (1)

Equity to total capital employed Owner equity ratio

Equity to equity plus long term debt Equity to long term debt

Gearing Total borrowing to equity

Debt/equity ratio

Page 83: businessanalysis.ppt

83

Owner equity ratio

assets total

worthnetratioequity Owner

• Proportion of capital supplied by the owner

• Can be expressed as a %

Page 84: businessanalysis.ppt

84

Owner equity ratio - example

assets total

net worthratioequity Owner

000 100

000 80ratioequity Owner = 80%

Net Worth Liabilities

£80 000 £20 000

Assets

Page 85: businessanalysis.ppt

85

Equity to equity plus long term debt

debt term long worthnet

worthnetratio

• Proportion of long term capital supplied by the owner

Page 86: businessanalysis.ppt

86

Gearing

100 worthnet

debt term long % Gearing

100assets

sliabilitie % Gearing

Page 87: businessanalysis.ppt

87

Gearing (1)

Measure of the drain on resources by long term debt

Normal <25% Critical 25-30% Trouble ahead >30%

Page 88: businessanalysis.ppt

88

Debt/Equity ratio

worthnet

sliabilitie totalratioy debt/equit

Page 89: businessanalysis.ppt

89

Performance ratios

A measure of the return on resource utilised by the business

Page 90: businessanalysis.ppt

90

Return on Capital

100capital

profitcapital on return %

100 worthnet

profitequity owner on return %

Page 91: businessanalysis.ppt

91

Return on Capital (1)

100assets

profitemployed capital on return %

100sales

profitmargin profit %

Page 92: businessanalysis.ppt

92

You can manipulate numbers

Profit = £10 000

Assets=£100 000

Liabilities = £20 000

100capital

profitcapitalon return %

100000 100

000 10capitalon return %

= 10%

100net worth

profitequityowner on return %

100000) 20-000 (100

000 10capitalon return %

= 12.5%

WHICH ONE DO YOU CHOOSE ?

Page 93: businessanalysis.ppt

93

You can manipulate numbers AGAIN

Profit = £10 000

Assets=£100 000

Liabilities = £50 000

100capital

profitcapitalon return %

100000 100

000 10capitalon return %

= 10%

100net worth

profitequityowner on return %

100000) 50-000 (100

000 10capitalon return %

= 20%

WHICH ONE DO YOU CHOOSE ?

Page 94: businessanalysis.ppt

94

Interpretation of ratios

Identify “unusual” information Identify reason for “unusual” information Identify trends Corroborate information by using other

sources Use ratio analysis as a tool for creating

questions (table 5.6 p70 Turner and Taylor)

Page 95: businessanalysis.ppt

95

Limits of ratio analysis

Ratios indicate trends away from expectation

No two businesses are alike Ratios are not an answer – they are a

platform on which to ask more questions

Page 96: businessanalysis.ppt

96

Business trends

Deriving conclusions about the health of a business from a single balance sheet or TPLA are difficult

Information is best from Studying a series of statements from the

business Investigating trends between statement

components

Page 97: businessanalysis.ppt

97

References on ratio analysis

Financial management for farmers and rural managers Martyn Warren Blackwell Science Chapter 3 pp 28-41

Applied Farm Management Turner and Taylor BSP Chapter 5 pp 52-78

Page 98: businessanalysis.ppt

98

Rental equivalents

The financial commitment of a business and the cost of owning or renting land

Rent and rates

+ Overdraft interest

+ Loan and mortgage interest

+ Capital repayments

+ Hire purchase and leasing charges

Page 99: businessanalysis.ppt

99

Rental equivalent measuresRental equivalent per ha

Farm type Average farm High performance farm

Dairy (rearing replacements) 150 270

Dairy (flying herd) 190 350

Cereals 95 200

Cereals / Dairy 140 220

Arable 180 350

Beef / Sheep 90 150

From Applied Farm Management Turner and Taylor p229-230

Page 100: businessanalysis.ppt

100

Disposal of funds statement

Traces flow of cash through business during year

Monitor of changes in assets and liabilities

Looks at sources and uses of cash

Page 101: businessanalysis.ppt

101

Disposal (Flow) of Funds Statement

Sources Net Profit (loss)

Depreciation (+)

Debtors (increase -, decrease +)

Creditors (increase +, decrease -)

Valuations (increase -, decrease +)

Benefits in kind (-)

CASH FROM TRADING

Add Capital introduced

Sale of land, property, investments

Increase in overdraft

Increase in loans

Reduction in Cash balances

CASH FROM OTHER SOURCES

TOTAL CASH AVAILABLE

Uses Commitments

Private drawings

Tax Payments

Reduction in loans

TOTAL COMMITMENTS

Add Purchase of of land, property, investments

Net purchase of buildings

Purchase of machinery

Less sale of machinery

Repayment of Overdraft

Increase in cash balances

TOTAL CASH USED

Page 102: businessanalysis.ppt

102

Sources of cash

Trading activities Profits

External sources Grants

Increase in liabilities More overdraft/loan cash available

Reduction in assets Realise asset into cash

Page 103: businessanalysis.ppt

103

Uses of cash

Losses Loss of wealth

External uses Removed from trading horizon

Reduction in liabilities Pay off debt

Increase in assets Make the business less liquid by investing

Page 104: businessanalysis.ppt

104

Using the disposal of funds statement

Significant increases in liabilities Growth of fixed assets at expense of

current assets Growth in fixed assets financed though

short term liabilities Excessive private drawings

Page 105: businessanalysis.ppt

105

Cash flow analysis

Cash is the most sensitive financial indicator

Warns of trading difficulties as they happen

Indicator of business liquidity

Page 106: businessanalysis.ppt

106

Cash flow analysisbudget

actual good

actual bad

time

Page 107: businessanalysis.ppt

107

Cash flow analysis – weak 1st 6 months

  Net Cash Flow Cumulative

Jan -4420 -4420

Feb -2052 -6472

Mar 3309 -3163

Apr 2991 -172

May -3462 -3634

Jun -4434 -8068

Jul 20728 12660

Aug 13194 25854

Sep 16292 42146

Oct 14577 56723

Nov 10086 66809

Dec 23060 89869

Total 89869

-10000

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Net Cash Flow Cumulative

Page 108: businessanalysis.ppt

108

Cash flow analysis – consistent cash flow

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Net Cash Flow Cumulative

  Net Cash Flow Cumulative

Jan 7000 7000

Feb 7000 14000

Mar 7000 21000

Apr 7000 28000

May 7000 35000

Jun 7000 42000

Jul 7000 49000

Aug 7000 56000

Sep 7000 63000

Oct 7000 70000

Nov 7000 77000

Dec 7000 84000

Total 84000

Page 109: businessanalysis.ppt

109

Cash flow analysis

Inconsistent cash flow usually leads to increased interest charges and lower profits

Limits ability to deal with uncertainty Limits capacity to plan capital

spending

Page 110: businessanalysis.ppt

110

Variance analysis

Measures discrepancies in cash flow between budgeted and actual

It accounts for VOLUME (size of enterprise) OUTPUT (yield) or INPUT per unit

volume PRICE per unit produced or consumed

Page 111: businessanalysis.ppt

111

Variance analysis (1)

Favourable variance Increase in output Decrease in input

Unfavourable variance Decrease in output Increase in input

Page 112: businessanalysis.ppt

112

Variance analysis (2)

Two way PRICE vs INPUT/OUTPUT

Three way PRICE vs INPUT/OUTPUT vs VOLUME

Page 113: businessanalysis.ppt

113

Two way analysis

Budget Cereal yield 8t/ha Cereal price £90/t

Actual Cereal yield 9t/ha Cereal price £85/t

t/ha

£/t

BUDGET

8

90

ACTUAL

9

85

Unfavourable variance due to price

Favou

rab

le

varia

nce d

ue to

q

uan

tity

Page 114: businessanalysis.ppt

114

Two way analysis (1)

Actual revenue = 9t/ha x £85/t = £765 Budget revenue = 8t/ha x £90/t = £720

Difference = +£45

Page 115: businessanalysis.ppt

115

Two way analysis (2)

price budgetquantity unit in differencequantity unit to due Variance

quantity actualprice in differenceprice to due Variance

Example

90££90/t1t/haquantity unit to due Variance

£45- 9t/ha-£5price to due Variance

Total variance = +£45

Page 116: businessanalysis.ppt

116

Three way analysis

price budget quantity budget volume in difference volume to due variance

price budget volume actual quantity in difference quantity to due variance

quantity actualvolume actual price in difference price to due variance

Page 117: businessanalysis.ppt

117

Three way analysis (1)

Budget Cereal yield 8t/ha Cereal price £90/t Cereal area 22 ha

Actual Cereal yield 9t/ha Cereal price £85/t Cereal area 25 ha

Calculate the variance

Page 118: businessanalysis.ppt

118

Limits of variance analysis

Time consuming and complicated OK if limit analysis to major items

Not suitable for inter farm comparisons Formula is imprecise

Page 119: businessanalysis.ppt

119

Favourable price and quantity variance

quantity

price

BUDGET

ACTUALfavourable variance due to price

favou

rab

le

varia

nce d

ue to

q

uan

tity

Interaction price x quantity

Attributed to price alone

Page 120: businessanalysis.ppt

120

Unfavourable price and quantity variance

quantity

price

BUDGET

ACTUAL

unfavourable variance due to price

un

favou

rab

le

varia

nce d

ue to

q

uan

tity

Interaction price x quantity

Attributed to quantity alone

Page 121: businessanalysis.ppt

121

Favourable quantity and unfavourable price variance

quantity

price

BUDGET

ACTUAL

Price variance = diff price x budget quantity

Quantity variance = diff

quantity x actual price

price budgetquantity in differencevariancequantity quantity actualprice in differencevariance price

Over estimation

Page 122: businessanalysis.ppt

122

A health warning

It is not always possible to calculate/construct every analysis technique.

Calculated analyses are often in conflict with each other

Interpretation is not always clear Always ask why and find an explanation Commonsense must prevail