Page 1
Department of Business Administration
1 Faculty of Law and Social Sciences | Campus Universitario | 13071 Ciudad Real Telf.: (+34) 902 204 100 | Fax.: (+34) 902 204 130 www.uclm.es/dep/dae
2009.07.23
WORKING
PAPER
"Business strategy, human resource systems, and organizational
performance in the Spanish banking industry"
Isidro Peña
Manuel Villasalero
University of Castilla-La Mancha
[email protected]
[email protected]
Submitted to The International Journal of Human Resource Management (accepted for
publication).
Cite as: Peña, I. and Villasalero, M. (2010), "Business strategy, human resource
systems, and organizational performance in the Spanish banking industry" The
International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 2864-2888.
DOI:10.1080/09585192.2010.528670
Page 2
1
BUSINESS STRATEGY, HUMAN RESOURCE SYSTEMS, AND
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE IN THE SPANISH BANKING
INDUSTRY [Second Draft, July 2009; IJHRM Style]
Isidro Peña
Manuel Villasalero
University of Castilla-La Mancha
Department of Business Administration
Faculty of Law and Social Sciences
Ciudad Real (Spain) 13071
Tel: (34) 902204100
Fax: (34) 902204130
[email protected]
Page 3
2
Business strategy, human resource systems, and
organizational performance in the Spanish banking industry
Isidro Peñaa* and Manuel Villasaleroa
aDepartment of Business Administration,
University of Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain
(Received xxxxxx; final version received xxxx)
Abstract Although human resource (HR) systems in the form of bundles of HR practices
and their impact on organizational performance have attracted considerable attention, the
role that business strategy could play in this relationship remains uncertain, particularly in
service industries. In order to avoid any confounding effects, this study analyzes the
performance impact of adopting different HR systems in an empirical setting in which
employees are vital if the company is to remain competitive, the firms belong to the same
industry and the primary activities involved are the delivery of services to customers. Based
on survey data from 86 banking institutions in Spain, three HR systems were identified, two
of which rendered better organizational performance when matched to defender strategies,
thus supporting a contingency explanation of the adoption of HR systems. Findings showed
that even in an industry under strong universalistic pressures to adopt certain predictable
HR practices, matching HR systems with a business strategy pays off.
Keywords Banking industry; defenders; human resource systems; organizational
performance; prospectors; Spain.
* Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] .
Page 4
3
Business strategy, human resource systems, and
organizational performance in the Spanish banking industry
Table of contents
1. Introduction
2. Theoretical background
2.1. HR systems
2.2. HR systems and organizational performance
2.3. HR system matched with business strategy
3. The Spanish banking industry
4. Hypotheses
4.1. Defenders
4.2. Prospectors
5. Methods
5.1. Sample and data collection
5.2. Measurement of HR system
5.3. Measurement of business strategy
5.4. Measurement of organizational performance
5.5. Statistical techniques
6. Results
6.1. HR systems
6.2. Business strategies
6.3. Descriptive statistics
6.4. Hypotheses testing
7. Discussion
7.1. Context-specific drivers of HR systems
7.2. Performance consequences of HR systems
7.3. Research implications
7.4. Limitations and future studies
Page 5
4
Business strategy, human resource systems, and
organizational performance in the Spanish banking industry
1. Introduction
The role that human resources management (HRM) may play in allowing a firm to
remain competitive has been increasingly recognized by scholars and practitioners alike
in the last few years (Flood et al. 2008). In a world which is moving towards a
knowledge-based economy, HRs are becoming an important source of competitive
advantage in both manufacturing and service industries, thus demanding the adoption of
correct practices in areas such as human resource (HR) selection, job design,
performance appraisal, compensation or development (Bae and Lawler, 2000). Rather
than implementing individual practices on a stand-alone base, the adoption of a system
of mutually reinforcing HR practices can make a difference in the marketplace by
enabling a firm to gain access to valuable, scarce, imperfectly imitable and difficult to
substitute HRs (Barney and Wright, 1998; Wright, McMahan and McWilliams, 1994).
Despite the numerous studies which have been carried out on the relationship
between HR systems and organizational performance, considerable uncertainty remains
as to the causal picture of that relationship, ranging from universalistic to contingency
explanations (Delery and Doty, 1996). The universalistic position states that there is
always a single best HR system, whereas the contingency position advocates the need to
match HR systems with business contingencies such as business strategy. Contradictory
findings abound, but overall the evidence from a vast amount of studies dismisses the
validity of contingency explanations (Becker and Huselid, 1998), which is extremely
surprising considering the level of empirical support for contingency reasoning in many
Page 6
5
fields of management. This uncertainty is greater still in the context of service industries
(Guest, Michie, Conway and Sheehan, 2003), as most studies have been conducted in
manufacturing industries (e.g., Arthur, 1994). Some of the reasons behind these
contradictory findings can be attributed to the widespread use of multi-industry settings
and the resulting confusion over the meaning of HR systems or business strategies in
different industries, the cross-industry variation in the importance attached to HRs and
the accompanying varying levels of labor intensity (Li, 2003).
In this study, we analyze the performance impact of adopting different HR
systems in an empirical setting in which the employees are vital to the company’s
remaining competitive, the firms belong to the same industry and the primary activities
involved are the delivery of services to customers (Batt, 2002). The banking industry in
Spain not only meets all these requirements, but also provides a highly distinctive
setting which makes it possible for researchers to trace the adoption of HR systems back
to industrial conditions. Based on survey data from 86 banking institutions in Spain,
three HR systems were identified, revolving around the “organic workplace”, the
“internal development of HRs” and “relational employee management”. When the last
two of these were matched to defender strategies they delivered better organizational
performance, thus supporting a contingency explanation of the adoption of HR systems.
2. Theoretical background
The design of HR systems in areas such as recruitment, job design, evaluation,
compensation or development for the business to gain a competitive advantage has
attracted increasing attention over the last few years (Lengnick-Hall, Lengnick-Hall,
Andrade and Drake, 2009; Wood, 1999). Rather than using individual HR practices in
isolation, researchers have come to recognize the importance of using HR systems on
the grounds of both strategic and organizational considerations. Taking a resource-based
Page 7
6
view of the firm, the adoption of individual HR practices is less likely to comply with
the requirements of being scarce, valuable, imperfectly imitable and difficult to
substitute than the adoption of a system of mutually coherent practices (Becker and
Huselid, 1998). Taking a behavioral perspective, the implementation of HR practices as
a set of mutually reinforcing policies allows the business to avoid the detrimental effects
that may arise from an isolated implementation of potentially contradictory HR
practices (Pfeffer, 1998).
2.1. HR systems
Many studies have proposed conceptually derived typologies or empirically based
taxonomies of HR systems. Amongst the first group are the make and buy HR systems
proposed by Miles and Snow (1984), the work harder, work smarter and work
differently HR systems advanced by Schuler and Jackson (1987a), the input control,
behavior control and output control HR systems used by Snell (1992), the commitment,
productivity, compliance and collaboration HR systems conceived by Lepak and Snell
(1999, 2002), and the bureaucratic, professional, market and flexible HR systems
described by Verburg, Den Hartog and Koopman (2007). The second group contains the
control and commitment HR systems identified by Arthur (1992, 1994), the
administrative and human capital enhancing HR systems recognized by Youndt, Snell,
Dean and Lepak (1996), and the traditional and innovative HR systems described by
Ichnowski, Shaw and Prennushi (1997).
Another stream of studies is focused on the dimensions of HR systems, rather than
on types of HR systems. For example, Huselid (1995) describes employee skills,
employee motivation and organizational structures as being the dimensions underlying
HR systems, whereas in a parallel study MacDuffie (1995) identifies similar dimensions
such as skill/knowledge, motivation/commitment and work structures. This set of
Page 8
7
dimensions also resembles that put forward by Appelbaum, Bailey, Berg and Kalleberg
(2000) and later analyzed by Bartel (2004), consisting of skills, incentives and
participation.
Despite the distinctions made between typologies and taxonomies and between
types and dimensions of HR systems, studies cannot easily be directly classified into
one category or another (Ichnowski and Shaw, 1999, 2003). As discussed by MacDuffie
(1995), there is no clear conceptual basis for identifying practices affecting just one
dimension or type of HR systems, nor is there a straightforward rationale for
considering that an HR system is empirically based or conceptually derived.
2.2. HR systems and organizational performance
The impact of HR systems on organizational performance has been extensively
empirically investigated, taking both universalistic and contingency perspectives
(Delery and Doty, 1996). Universalistic arguments are the simplest form of causal
reasoning in management because they imply that the relationship between an
independent variable and a dependent variable is universal across the population of
organizations (Delery, 1998). When this causal reasoning is applied in the context of
human resource management (HRM), it entails that the greater the use of specific HR
practices, the better the organizational performance.
The prescriptive bias is evident, as it proposes that several HR practices make a
direct impact on organizational performance, regardless of the environment or any other
factors. As a consequence, these HR practices have been prescriptively labeled with
various expressions such as “best practices” (Pfeffer 1994), “high-performance HR
practices” (Appelbaum et al. 2000; Huselid 1995), “progressive HR practices” (Delaney
and Huselid, 1996; Ichniowski, Shaw and Prennushi, 1997), “high implication
Page 9
8
practices” (Bae and Lawler 2000; Batt 2002), “commitment systems” (Arthur 1994;
Boselie, Paauwe and Jansen, 2001; Walton 1985) or “innovative HR practices”
(Ichniowski and Shaw 1999; Ichniowski et al. 1997), while “high-performance HR
practices” is the most widely accepted expression in HRM literature. Numerous studies
have attempted to evidence a direct correlation between HR practices and organizational
performance (Table 1).
-------------------------------
Insert Table 1 about here
-------------------------------
However, a considerable amount of studies also posit that the relationship
between HR systems and organizational performance is moderated by business
contingencies. Although many contingencies could possibly determine the election of
HR practices, the most frequently studied contingency variable is that of business
strategy. In fact, the evolution over time of the personnel function is closely coupled
with the growing interest among scholars and practitioners alike in the role of business
strategy in the HRM field.
Contingency studies seek to determine those business HR practices that best
match the company’s strategy (Arthur 1992, 1994; Miles and Show, 1984; Schuler and
Jackson, 1987a). The integration of strategy and HRM has been analyzed, taking into
consideration various strategic levels. Studies therefore exist that analyze the link
between HRM and corporate-level strategies, such as diversification strategy (Balkin
and Gómez-Mejía, 1990) or international strategy (Lei, Slocum and Slater, 2000),
whereas other studies investigate the coupling of HRM with business-level strategies,
their being formed of strategic orientation (Miles and Snow, 1978), competitive strategy
(Porter, 1980) or product life cycle (Schuler and Jackson, 1987b).
Page 10
9
2.3. HR system matched with business strategy
With regard to the role of business-level strategy, many studies have analyzed the match
between business strategy and HR systems (Table 2), particularly through the use of the
proposals advanced by Miles and Snow (1984) and Schuler and Jackson (1987a).
-------------------------------
Insert Table 2 about here
-------------------------------
The model proposed by Miles and Snow (1984) can be considered to be the first
theoretical approximation in which the HR practices and systems that are best suited to
the business strategy were specified and studied in depth, thus obtaining a consistent
framework based on two opposed HRM systems, such as the buy-based system and the
make-based system. These stylized systems were subsequently matched with the
strategic orientation of the organization, ranging from the defender strategy to the
prospector strategy (Miles and Snow, 1978), by claiming that defenders must adopt
internally-developed HRM systems (make) if they are to perform correctly, whereas
prospectors must embrace market-based HRM systems (buy) if they are to do so.
The model advanced by Schuler and Jackson (1987a) is based on the widely used
Porter (1980) business strategy typology, revolving around differentiation and low cost
leadership strategies, and conveniently adapted to reflect an additional strategy centered
on innovation. After having carefully described various practices for each of the major
personnel functions, such as planning, staffing, performance appraisal, compensation
and training, Schuler and Jackson (1987a) went on to propose sets of mutually
reinforcing practices which made up various HR systems and they then matched those
HR systems with the business strategy. Specifically, innovative firms must adopt a work
Page 11
10
differently approach to HRM, whereas those firms committed to low cost leadership
must apply a work harder approach to HRM.
Although a considerable amount of studies have been carried out to date, most
findings have found no empirical support for a contingency relationship between
business strategy and HR systems (Table 2). Another important problem is that there is
no consensus regarding the personnel practices that best suit each specific business
strategy, since findings are contradictory amongst those studies which found some
empirical support for contingency relationships. Finally, it is interesting to note that
researchers have extensively embraced the model advanced by Schuler and Jackson
(1987a), whereas only a handful of exceptions adopt the model advanced by Miles and
Snow (1984), which is surprising as it would appear to have more empirical support
than does the other.
In an attempt to further develop the Miles and Snow typology (1984) of HR
systems in the light of the recent studies made so far on HR systems, we propose three
underlying dimensions behind systems focused on building or acquiring HRs. The
structural dimension is related to the way in which an organization deals with its
environment and makes key decisions regarding the internal or external source of HRs,
such as commitment to training, the development of internal labor markets or the
adoption of a promotion from within policy (Miles and Snow, 1984). The behavioral
dimension is concerned with the internal deployment of HRs within the organization,
including key decisions affecting the day-to-day life of a typical employee, no matter
how he or she attained a job position, such as job design, performance appraisal and
compensation (Schuler and Jackson, 1987a). The time dimension deals with the
approach a firm adopts towards managing relationships with employees over time,
Page 12
11
including the firm’s willingness to provide employment security and assure a long-
lasting relationship (Lepak and Snell, 1999).
The structural dimension was the focus of the Miles and Snow study (1984),
whereas the behavioral dimension was more clearly presented in Schuler and Jackson’s
study (1987a) and was later developed in Snell (1992) and Youndt at al. (1996). More
recent studies centered on the ever-changing HR talent requirements in today’s
competitive landscape (Lepak and Snell, 1999) have paved the way towards a
recognition of the importance of the time dimension (Lepak and Snell, 2002; Verburg et
al., 2007).
In the context of the study presented here, the Miles and Snow typology (1978) of
prospector, analyzer and defender strategies proved very useful in capturing the existent
business strategies in the Spanish banking industry, whereas the Miles and Snow
typology (1984) of building HRs and acquiring HRs was extremely useful in mapping
the HR practices undertaken by banking institutions in Spain in the last couple of years.
Moreover, these HR practices revolve around the three underlying dimensions identified
above, as is discussed in the following section.
3. The Spanish banking industry
The Spanish banking industry is made up of three main financial institutions (private
banks, savings banks and credit unions), which compete against one another under a
regulated market. Since the privatization, liberalization and deregulation that took place
in the 1990s (Vives, 1990), there are no operative differences between private banks,
savings banks and credit unions in Spain, since they are all cleared to become involved
in any banking activity, ranging from commercial banking to investment banking,
passing through institutional banking (Zúñiga, Fuente and Suárez, 2004; Zúñiga and
Page 13
12
Vicente, 2006). In contrast to other developed countries, the separation of retail banking
and wholesale banking is not mandatory in Spain, a legal environment that has
produced the consolidation of a universal banking model. In Spain, it is extremely
difficult to find specialized financial institutions focused solely on savings, personal
loans, mortgages, credit cards, private banking, corporate loans or asset management.
Spanish banking institutions are all involved in many of these banking activities as a
consequence of their firm size, geographical scope and business strategy, regardless of
whether they are private banks, savings banks or credit unions (Maudos, Pastor and
Pérez, 2002). Generally speaking, small-sized banking institutions are mainly centered
on commercial banking activities, medium-sized banking institutions are involved in
both commercial and investment banking, and large-sized banking institutions are
committed to institutional banking activities, in addition to retail and investment
banking activities (Más, Nicolau and Ruiz, 2005). Any deviation from this general rule
can be explained by geographical scope and business strategy. One important
consequence of the universal banking model is the widespread design of work structures
that makes it possible for employees to perform multiple task duties.
Another distinctive feature of the Spanish banking industry lies in the branch
model. In sharp contrast with other European countries, the banking channels in Spain
are based on small-sized branches which are dispersed throughout several locations
within a concrete city (Vives, 1990). It is not unusual to find as many as 20 branches of
the same bank in a medium-sized city, with an average branch size of about 5
employees. The prevailing European model consisting of a large banking office usually
located at the center of each city has not been successfully applied in Spain, as many
foreign banks have discovered over the last few years (Fernández de Guevara, Maudos
and Pérez, 2005). The Spanish customer is accustomed to finding many competing
Page 14
13
branches near home and to being treated personally by dedicated employees. The
customer orientation of the employee has become a key success factor in the banking
industry, along with the level of confidence developed over years of relations. In many
instances, the employee’s technical competence is of less importance for the customers
than their perception of the employee’s trustworthiness. On the contrary to the
impersonal and technical-oriented approach which is typical of the large office, the
branch model in Spain increases the bank’s dependence on its employees for customer
retention and satisfaction.
The third distinguishing feature concerns the attractive competitive structure of
the banking industry. There are sundry reasons to explain the favorable conditions
Spanish banking institutions have enjoyed for many years, but the most important of
them can be summarized in three main factors: entry barriers, market concentration and
industry growth. Despite the relaxation of entry barriers in local banking markets as a
consequence of liberalization and deregulation across Europe, entry barriers continue to
be very high in the Spanish banking industry owing to the prevailing universal banking
model and, more importantly, the aforementioned structure of the banking channels in
Spain. The requirement that a potential competitor should enter the banking industry
with an extensive branch network which is prepared to provide virtually any banking
service is a major motive behind the persistent failure of foreign banks to gain a market
share in Spain (Fernández de Guevara and Maudos, 2004). The market concentration is
extremely high owing to the Spanish government’s lax policy on mergers and
acquisitions during the 80s and 90s, which led to the creation of some national
champions such as SANTANDER or BBVA amongst private banks, and LA CAIXA or
CAJA MADRID amongst savings banks. Credit unions are currently undergoing the
processes of mergers and acquisitions that were undertaken by their banking
Page 15
14
counterparts in previous decades. In fact, Spain’s four largest banking institutions
control about 50% of the domestic deposits and roughly 55% of the credit and loans. In
Spain, the banking industry growth rate clearly outperformed that of its European
counterparts from 1999 to 2008, with a yearly average growth rate in credit for the last
five years of more than 10% (Fernández de Guevara et al., 2005). In order to cope with
these favorable industry conditions, Spanish banking institutions made a vast
investment in human capital as a consequence of an extensive recruitment policy
specifically targeted at young people with postgraduate degrees in parallel with the
promotion of an early retirement policy for older employees.
The pervasive universal banking model, the distinctive retail channels and the
attractive competitive structure in the Spanish banking industry, along with the
accompanying HR implications in this market, present an interesting opportunity to tap
into the link between business strategy and HR systems in the light of the contradictory
findings amassed so far under the contingency approach. To do so, the study presented
herein has chosen the Miles and Snow (1978) typology of defenders, analyzers and
prospectors and the Miles and Snow (1984) typology of HR systems focused on
building and acquiring HRs, conveniently delineated on the basis of structural,
behavioral and time dimensions.
4. Hypotheses
Drawing on the theoretical review carried out so far, we propose two sets of hypotheses
which are amenable to testing in the setting of the Spanish banking industry described
above. The first set comprises two macro hypotheses addressing the validity of both
universalistic and contingency relationships, whereas the second set includes two
groups of micro hypotheses which make it possible to specify the particular contingency
relationships.
Page 16
15
Many works have found evidence supporting the theory that the adoption of
certain HR practices has a direct impact on organizational performance (Table 1). Most
findings pertain to individual HR practices, whereas findings related to systems of
mutually reinforcing HR practices are scarce and far from being conclusive. Among the
reasons behind these contradictory findings are the predominant choice of multi-
industry samples and the prevailing focus on non-labor intensive industries. The paucity
of non-U.S. studies is also of concern. In order to overcome these limitations and to
provide findings based on non-U.S. studies, we re-examine the performance impact of
HR systems in a research setting which is more appropriate for the testing of
universalistic relationships. Therefore, our first hypothesis is as follows:
Hypothesis 1: The adoption of HR systems has a positive effect on organizational
performance.
The evidence regarding the moderating role of business strategy on the
relationship between HR systems and organizational performance is even more elusive
than that related to the direct impact of HR systems on organizational performance. In
fact, there are more empirical studies which do not support a contingency relationship
than those which do (Table 2). This confusion can be partly explained by the fact that
the testing of contingency relationships is not independent of the typology used to
characterize business strategy. Most studies are based on the Porter typology (1980) of
business strategies, whereas evidence based on the Miles and Snow typology (1978) is
scarce. As justified in the previous section, we use this latter typology to propose the
second hypothesis:
Hypothesis 2: The relationship between the adoption of HR systems and
organizational performance is moderated by business strategy.
Page 17
16
The second set of hypotheses addresses specific HR systems and their impact on
organizational performance, considering the role of business strategy. By taking the
Miles and Snow typology (1978) of business strategies, we analyze the performance
consequences of matching HR systems with business strategies. Two micro hypotheses
are proposed, one for prospectors and one for defenders. It is worth noting that this
study carries out an exploration of intra-industry contingency patterns within a single
industry, thus avoiding the potential bias of confounding intra-industry contingency
patterns with inter-industry contingency patterns which may be present in multi-
industry studies.
4.1. Defenders
Defenders operate within a narrow competitive scope and stick to it in the long term.
They stress stability and business commitment in dealing with their surrounding
environment, which calls for extensive planning. Defenders focus on building human
resources by adopting a make system (Miles and Snow, 1984), signifying that they
invest heavily in training and career development, favor internal promotions over
recruitment above entry level and apply specific policies for retaining employees.
Hence, the following hypothesis is advanced:
Hypothesis 3a: For firms pursuing a defender strategy, the adoption of make-
based HR systems has a positive effect on organizational performance.
Since defenders attempt to compete on the basis of efficiency, they design an
organizational structure which formalizes procedures and routinizes tasks (Miles and
Snow, 1978). Consequently, defenders embrace a mechanic system revolving around
narrow job designs, process-oriented performance appraisal, fixed reward systems and
seniority-based compensation. In view of the above arguments, our hypothesis is stated
as follows:
Page 18
17
Hypothesis 3b: For firms pursuing a defender strategy, the adoption of mechanic
HR systems has a positive effect on organizational performance.
With regard to employee relationship management, the fact that defenders commit
to the business in the long-term and compete on the basis of incremental changes
explains why these organizations adopt a relational approach to dealing with employees.
Defenders are willing to provide employees with employment security and to assure a
long-lasting relationship. Our hypothesis is accordingly stated as follows:
Hypothesis 3c: For firms pursuing a defender strategy, the adoption of relational
HR systems has a positive effect on organizational performance.
It is interesting to note that the above hypotheses are complementary inasmuch as
each hypothesis pertains to different dimensions of the HRM function: dealing with the
environment (structural dimension), the internal deployment of HRs within the
organization (behavioral dimension) and employee relationship management (time
dimension).
4.2. Prospectors
The prospectors’ definition of their competitive scope is broad and unstable, since they
are actively seeking opportunities. This type of business strategy implies that the firm is
willing to move into new business areas and, eventually, exit from existent products and
markets, thus showing a short term commitment to its business domain. Improvisation
frequently replaces extensive planning because of the need to move quickly in response
to market opportunities. As a consequence, prospectors tend to buy the ever-changing
need for HR talent in the external marketplace rather than investing in the time-
consuming development of internal labor markets (Miles and Snow, 1984). The
following hypothesis is presented:
Page 19
18
Hypothesis 4a: For firms pursuing a prospector strategy, the adoption of buy HR
systems has a positive effect on organizational performance.
Internally, prospectors demand a flexible organizational design centered on the
low formalization of tasks and outcome-based control systems (Miles and Snow, 1978).
On the HR side, it implies an organic system focused on broad job designs, outcome-
oriented performance appraisal, variable reward systems and performance-based
compensation. The following hypothesis is therefore proposed:
Hypothesis 4b: For firms pursuing a prospector strategy, the adoption of organic
HR systems has a positive effect on organizational performance.
Finally, defenders adopt a market-based approach to dealing with employees as a
consequence of the need to continuously restructure the business domain and hence
redefine the talent pool to match the ever-changing competitive landscape. Rather than
being committed to extensive training targeted towards existent employees, prospectors
prefer to manage HR talent by contracting new employees and laying employees off.
For the sake of flexibility and quick response, prospectors are reluctant to provide
employees with employment security and thus adopt a transactional approach to
employee relationship management. The last hypothesis is stated as follows:
Hypothesis 4c: For firms pursuing a prospector strategy, the adoption of
transactional HR systems has a positive effect on organizational performance.
As was previously explained, the first hypothesis pertains to dealing with the
environment, the second hypothesis is related to the internal deployment of HRs within
the organization and the third hypothesis is concerned with employee relationship
management.
Page 20
19
5. Methods
5.1. Sample and data collection
The population of this research was made up of 202 banking institutions based in Spain,
with 72 private banks, 47 savings banks and 83 credit unions. Bearing this population
composition in mind, a proportional stratified sampling would have been the most
appropriate choice in that it would have allowed us to ensure that each banking
institution category was represented in the same proportions within the overall sample,
but this was impossible since the small population size would have dramatically
decreased the statistical power necessary to conduct the quantitative analyses. Instead, a
decision was made to use a census procedure with the purpose of increasing the final
sample size, thus making the joint analysis of all categories of Spanish banking
institutions possible, which made more sense than excluding a category because it did
not match the population proportions.
The data was collected via a questionnaire survey targeted at the 202 banking
institutions. This was mailed to the corporate human resources manager of each banking
institution, as these managers had intimate knowledge of both the firm’s HR practices
and the generic business strategy. Before beginning the field work in January 2005, the
questionnaire was validated by 2 banking institutions and representatives from 2
national associations of banking institutions. As a result of this procedure, the quality of
the survey was improved by incorporating new items, dropping unimportant items and
amalgamating similar items.
The overall response rate after three mailing rounds attained a level of over 42
percent (86 usable responses) which was higher than the expected 25 percent obtained
in similar mail surveys. With this response rate, the sampling error was equal to 8.2
percent at a confidence level of 95 percent. The response rate was, on average for the
Page 21
20
credit unions (36 usable responses, 43 percent), slightly higher than the average for the
savings banks (25 usable responses, 53 percent) and slightly lower than average for the
private banks (15 usable responses, 21 percent), which can be explained by the fact that
private banks are under greater pressure to be the targets of mail surveys in Spain (many
of which are mandatory). Although the private banks were under-represented in the
final sample as compared to the population proportions (as a consequence of it not
being possible to use a proportional stratified sampling procedure, as explained above),
the potential bias introduced by this fact is negligible in the light of the research
objectives addressed by the study presented here, since no direct comparison of
different banking institutions was pursued.
-------------------------------
Insert Table 3 about here
-------------------------------
The non-response bias test undertaken in this research indicated that there was no
difference between respondents and non-respondents in available archival data, such as
the banking institution’s size (natural logarithm of number of employees, p= .836),
financial performance (return on equity, p= .718; return on assets, p= .922) or corporate
growth (yearly change in assets, p= .703).
5.2. Measurement of HR system
As a necessary task to delineate the HR practices leading to HR systems, an extensive
review was made of existing empirical literature in which special attention was paid to
those studies undertaken in the banking industry (Delery and Doty, 1996; Gelade and
Ivery, 2003; Saá and García-Falcón, 2004; Whitener, 2001). As a result of this review
several HR practices grouped into seven major areas were included in this research:
internal labor markets, participation, training, broad job design, rewards, job stability
and rigorous selection (Table 4).
Page 22
21
-------------------------------
Insert Table 4 about here
-------------------------------
Another key aspect of this research consisted of delineating HR systems with the
aid of a qualitative or quantitative technique1. In this study, we used a factor analysis of
the HR practices considered, which permitted us to delineate different dimensions of the
HR system. Other techniques do not allow the researcher to identify the underlying
dimensions of the HR system.
5.3. Measurement of business strategy
In order to maintain consistency with the choice of the internal and market HR systems
described above, the well-known Miles and Snow typology (1978) consisting of
defenders, analyzers and prospectors was used in this study.
The measurement of business strategy was made possible through the widely-
used paragraph method. In accordance with the technique advanced by Shortell and
Zajac (1990), HR managers were asked to self-type their banking institution’s business
strategy on a continuous scale ranging from 1 to 7, which subsequently allowed the
researchers to derive the relevant business strategy categories of defenders, analyzers
and prospectors2.
5.4. Measurement of organizational performance
The measurement of firm performance in the HRM literature is problematic as the
easily available financial measures do not properly reflect the level to which HR
practices have contributed to overall business success (Dess and Robinson, 1984). In
order to make an appropriate measurement possible in the context of HRM, Delaney
and Huselid (1996) advanced a scale with which to directly assess the degree of
achievement in different business-related areas for banking institutions, such as market
Page 23
22
share, profitability, the growth rate of deposits and loans, productivity and customer
satisfaction3.
In order to avoid any potential common-method bias prompted by the fact that the
same informant was asked to report on both the independent (HR practices and business
strategy) and dependent (organizational performance) measures, a test for convergent
validity was carried out by computing the correlations between our subjective
performance measure and two widely-used objective performance measures derived
from archival data such as return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE). In both
cases, the Pearson correlation coefficients exceeded 0.6 (n= 86 firms; p< 0.001), thus
indicating the convergent validity of our performance measure.
5.5. Statistical techniques
As a preliminary procedure, a principal component factor analysis was used to identify
the underlying dimensions among the items addressing the HR practices such that a set
of variables representing the banking institution’s adoption of a HR system was
produced. Those factors with eigenvalues exceeding one were extracted and
subsequently interpreted with the aid of a varimax rotation.
The main statistical technique employed for the hypotheses testing were ordinary
least squared linear regression (H1 and H2). By following the suggestions made by
Venkatraman (1989) and Aiken and West (1991), a multiple linear regression with
interactions was used to evaluate the existence of a moderator effect (H3 and H4),
namely, a relationship involving HR system (HRS), organizational performance (OP)
and business strategy (BS) in which the relationship between HRS and OP differed
according to the BS:
OP = 0 + 1 HRS + 2 BS + 3 HRS×BS + ; [1]
Page 24
23
In accordance with the regression equation [1], the interaction term HRS×BS
implies that the regression of OP on HRS depends upon the specific value of BS,
signifying that there are different regression lines for each business strategy. The
moderation hypothesis will not therefore be rejected if the non-standardised β3
coefficient is significantly different from zero (Venkatraman, 1989), and the
explanatory power of the model in which the interaction term is incorporated improves
significantly (Aiken and West, 1991).
6. Results
6.1. HR systems
The factor analysis resulted in a three-fold solution accounting for over 84 percent of
the variance. The values of the Bartlett sphericity test (p <.001) and KMO (.72)
indicated that the data were appropriate for factor analysis (Table 5).
-------------------------------
Insert Table 5 about here
-------------------------------
The factor loadings matrix showed that the three-factor solution was easily
amenable to interpretation. The make-based factor captures various practices related to
the banking institution policies promoting the internal development of employees’
capabilities, such as the level of participation, the training programs and the presence of
an internal job market. The organic factor represents broad job design and outcome-
based variable reward systems which are typical attributes of organic organizations as
opposed to mechanic organizations7. Finally, the relational factor reflects the firm’s
willingness to maintain long-lasting relationships with its employees by making
rigorous selection decisions in exchange for job security and the assurance of an
enduring employment relationship.
6.2. Business strategies
Page 25
24
The introduction of the different business strategies into the regression equation was
carried out by using dummy variables (Aiken and West, 1991). Two dummy variables
were generated in order to represent the defender strategy in one extreme and the
prospector strategy in another, whereas the remaining non-pure strategies were grouped
into the omitted category. It should be noted that, for interpretation purposes, this model
implies a comparison of a pure strategy (defender or prospector) vs. a non-pure strategy
(omitted category).
When the independent variables are dummy variables, the interaction effect is
measured by the difference between the slopes of the linear regression lines.
6.3. Descriptive statistics
Colinearity was not an issue as no correlation among the independent variables
was above 0.4. The correlation between the prospector strategy and defender strategy
was well above that value, but these dummy variables were not entered simultaneously
in the regression equations (Table 6).
-------------------------------
Insert Table 6 about here
-------------------------------
Apart from the likely presence of scale economies as reflected in the correlation
between banking institution size and organizational performance, the bivariate results
based on the correlation matrix showed strong preliminary support for the universalistic
approach; the adoption of HR systems was significantly correlated with organizational
performance, regardless of whether the HR system was based on make-based practices,
organic practices or relational practices. However, this tentative finding must be
interpreted with caution since it could mask hidden contingency relationships. The
effectiveness of a given HR system may be different when it is applied by a prospector
as opposed to a defender banking institution. Thus, the exploration of the pair-wise
Page 26
25
correlation matrix was encouraging since it involved the challenge of uncovering real
contingency relationships when apparently universalistic relationships seemed to be at
work.
6.4. Hypotheses testing
The results of the hypotheses testing showed that the adoption of HR systems makes a
positive impact on banking institution performance, as the coefficient estimates for
make-based practices, organic practices and relational practices proved to be positive
and statistically significant at the 5 percent level (Table 7). Furthermore, the explanatory
power of the Model [2] in which these three HR systems were included significantly
improved over the baseline Model [1]. However, a closer inspection of these findings
revealed that organic practices lost their significance when business strategy variables
were included in the Model [4], whereas the performance impact of make-based
practices and relational practices remained statistically significant.
-------------------------------
Insert Table 7 about here
-------------------------------
Until that moment, the empirical support for Hypothesis 1 which universalistically
relates the adoption of high-performance HR systems to organizational performance
was partial, as one out of three HR systems did not make a positive impact on
organizational performance. These findings were subsequently subject to further testing
in which the role of contingency relationships was incorporated with the aid of the
interactions between HR systems and business strategy. Jaccard and Torrisi (2003) have
demonstrated that the most appropriate approach for analyzing interactions is that
proposed by Cohen and Cohen (1983), which implies a direct comparison between the
principal effects model and the model with interactions. The principal effects model
contained only the major variables, namely the HR system and the business strategy
Page 27
26
(Model [4]), whereas the model with interactions involved the addition of the
interactions between the HR system and the business strategy to the principal effects
model (Models [5] to [7]).
The results of this analysis supported Hypothesis 2, which states that business
strategy moderates the relationship between the adoption of a high-performance HR
system and organizational performance, since the explanatory power (measured by the
change in the R2 statistic) of Models [5] and [6], in which two out of the three pair-wise
interactions were incorporated, showed a significant improvement in comparison to the
principal effects model [4]. Furthermore, an inspection of the sign and significance of
the coefficient estimates in Model [5] indicated that the adoption of HR systems
promoting long-term employment relations makes a positive impact on organizational
performance when the banking institution implements a defender strategy. The
coefficient estimates in Model [6] likewise supported the hypothesis that the adoption of
HR systems centered on the internal development of employees favorably affects
organizational performance when the banking institution follows a defender strategy.
On the contrary to these findings, the coefficient estimates in Model [7] were not
statistically significant, nor was the change in R2, but it is interesting to note that the
sign of the coefficient estimates was as expected, i.e., that the adoption of HR systems
based on organic practices fuels organizational performance when the banking
institution applies a prospector strategy.
7. Discussion
7.1. Context-specific drivers of HR systems
During the last decade the Spanish banking industry has enjoyed both an attractive
competitive structure and important growth rates. The need to match the increasing
demand for banking services with the necessary provision of skilled personnel to the
Page 28
27
banking industry has produced a vast amount of investment in human capital, which has
taken the form of an extensive recruitment policy specifically targeted at young people
with graduate degrees in parallel with the promotion of an early retirement policy for
older employees. The entire banking industry’s top priority has been to develop banking
professionals from scratch, thus promoting a clear orientation towards the internal
development of HRs according to a make-based system, rather than buying banking
professionals from a skill shortage labor market.
The widespread universal banking model has imposed the need for Spanish
banking institutions to have employees at their disposal who are capable of performing
multiple duties. As a consequence of this challenge, the banking institutions have set up
an organic environment characterized by broad job design, flexible job positions,
variable compensation systems and outcome-based rewards, thus making the universal
banking model possible from an HR perspective.
The dense retail channel network and accompanying small-sized branches have
placed major importance on their employees’ customer orientation. Spanish customers
are accustomed to being dealt with personally by dedicated employees with whom they
develop a long-lasting, personal relationship. Spanish banking institutions have
consequently been compelled to promote a long-term approach to employment as a
result of the evolving customer-employee connections: a given employee is not easily
replaceable with any other employee. This has prompted banking institutions to adopt a
relational dealing with their employees.
It is interesting to note that this study’s industry-specific findings are partially
consistent with the multi-industry findings of Husselid (1995), MacDuffie (1995) and
Bartel (2004), as our make-based, organic and relational HR systems revolve around
employee skills, organizational structures and employee motivation, respectively. In
Page 29
28
addition to providing further evidence for the presence of HR systems, our study
contributes to extant research by detailing the formation of HR systems in the context of
a specific industry and the patterns of coherence among HR practices, such as
promotion from within in exchange for extensive training and employee participation
(make-based HR system), flexible job positions in exchange for generous compensation
packages (organic HR system), and rigorous selection in exchange for a long-term job
(relational HR system).
7.2. Performance consequences of HR systems
The previously described setting represents a unique opportunity for researchers to
investigate the performance impact of adopting different HR systems, solely because it
favors a universalistic picture of the causal linkages and thus provides a stringent,
conservative test for the contingency approach. In a distinctive context that clearly
promotes the internal development of human resources, an organic workplace and a
relational dealing with employees, any deviation from these HR practices could entail a
detrimental effect on the banking institution’s organizational performance, even when
the business strategy has recommended that it should embrace this deviation.
Our findings have shown that the relationship between HR systems and
organizational performance is moderated by the banking institution’s business strategy,
thus supporting the contingency approach. There is no one best way to manage human
resources without considering the role of business strategy, not even in the context of a
Spanish banking industry that has been under strong pressure to adopt some predictable
HR practices. The effectiveness of these HR practices depends upon the type of
business strategy adopted by banking institutions, and thus does not support Hypothesis
1. It is interesting to note that real contingency relationships are somewhat hidden
behind apparent universalistic relationships, as suggested by the preliminary findings
Page 30
29
stemming both from the correlation matrix and from certain regression equations
(Models [2] and [4]). Only when business strategy is brought back into the analysis, do
the actual contingency patterns emerge, thus supporting Hypothesis 2.
Bearing in mind the conservative nature of our test, we found that the internal
development of human resources and the relational dealing with employees contribute
to organizational performance, and that defender banking institutions gain more benefit
from adopting these HR systems than do prospector banking institutions, thus
supporting Hypotheses 3a and 3c. Contrary to Hypothesis 3b, the adoption of an organic
workplace does not prove to be more beneficial for defender banking institutions.
These contingency patterns are quite consistent with Miles and Snow (1984) and
Lepak and Snell (1999). The internal development of human resources and the
relational dealing with employees are more effective when the banking institution
follows a defender strategy4. On the contrary, the contingency patterns suggested by
Schuler and Jackson (1987a) do not obtain empirical support. The banking institutions
that follow a prospector strategy do not obtain any gains from adopting an organic
workplace, nor do those that choose a defender strategy find it beneficial to adopt a
mechanic workplace. In this respect, it is worth noting that the lack of supporting
evidence for the moderating effect of business strategy on the relationship between
organic HR systems and business performance can be attributed to the way in which
business strategy is operationalized in this work. The discussion regarding organic vs.
mechanic workplaces is presented by Schuler and Jackson (1987a), taking a somewhat
adapted version of the Porter (1980) typology of business strategy, whereas our findings
are, conversely, based on the Miles and Snow (1978) typology. As is widely recognized,
the overlap between both typologies is far from being perfect.
Page 31
30
7.3. Research implications
Two interesting research implications emerge from the findings discussed above. First,
the bundles of HR practices identified in this study focused on the banking industry are
somewhat different from those obtained in previous studies, which possibly signifies
that more attention must be paid to the dynamics of industry-specific patterns of HR
systems. One important implication derived from this study is that multi-industry
investigations impose a coarse-grained framework for the analysis of HR practices. The
existing contradictory findings regarding the relationship between HR systems and
organizational performance may be partially attributed to the fact that intra-industry HR
practices are blurred with inter-industry HR practices. Rather than attempting to search
for inter-industry HR systems, it would prove more constructive to compare intra-
industry HR systems across different industries. More research is needed on the
intricacies of HR systems in specific industries.
Second, the most widely used theoretical perspective in the justification of HR
systems is that of maintaining coherence among a set of HR practices in order to
influence employee behavior in a predictable manner which is consistent with the
demands of business strategy (Pfeffer, 1994), in what Schuler and Jackson (1987a)
called “needed role behaviors”. This is an organizational behavior argument and the
connection with strategy is made mainly through an implementation perspective.
However, a resource-based approach to HRM would suggest that HR systems are
important if the firm is to be competitive because they easily meet the criteria of being
scarce, valuable, imperfectly imitable and difficult to substitute resources (Wright et al.,
1994), or at least, they meet these criteria more easily than do individual HR practices
(Becker and Huselid, 1998). This is a strategic management argument in which a
formulation perspective dominates. In our findings, we have discovered an HR system
Page 32
31
which does not make an impact on organizational performance, i.e., the adoption of an
organic workplace. Is this the consequence of it being an incongruent HR system
(organizational behavior argument) or is it the result of it being an easily imitable HR
system (strategic management argument)? According to the field work and our
conversations with HR managers, we have reason to consider that easy imitability is the
cause, thus explaining why the adoption of an organic HR system does not improve
organizational performance in the Spanish banking industry. The distinction drawn
between congruency and imitability in a HR system should be analyzed further.
7.4. Limitations and future studies
The results of this study should be interpreted with caution owing to certain limitations.
The first limitation is that, given sample size restrictions and the statistical power
needed to perform pair-wise interactions between business strategy and HR systems, it
was impossible to consider further control variables in the regression analyses to
account for organizational performance variation3. Aside from banking institution’s
size, or the type of banking institution4, studies using a larger sample could examine the
covariate effect of additional variables such as business specialization (Maudos et al.,
2002) or geographical scope (Maudos, 1998).
A second limitation pertains to the reliance on subjective measures. Although it is
rather difficult to capture HR practices using archival measures, the greater availability
of firms’ internal information over time and firms’ increasing willingness to disclose
information on corporate social responsibility issues provide researchers with an
opportunity to search for proxy measures of HR practices. Rather than relying on scale-
based measures of HR practices coming from questionnaire responses, as this study
does, it may prove useful to rely on proxy-based measures of HR practices collected
Page 33
32
from voluntary reports published by firms. Studies following this second measurement
strategy may shed light on the robustness of our findings based on questionnaire data.
A further limitation is related to the cross-sectional design of our research and the
accompanying problems in ascertaining the direction of causality and the presence of
unobservable effects. It is not clear whether HR systems determine organizational
performance (direct causality), as has been supposed throughout the study presented
here, or whether it is simply the case that well-performing banking institutions are
inclined to adopt high-performing HR systems (reverse causality), nor it is possible to
ascertain whether there is a true relationship between HR systems and organizational
performance (genuine causality) or whether some unobservable, firm-specific effects
are spuriously behind both the adoption of HR systems and the level of organizational
performance (spurious correlation). Research based on longitudinal data is needed to
confirm the assumptions of direct causality and genuine causality underlying our
findings.
8. Conclusion
The major objective of this study has been to analyze the performance impact of
adopting different HR systems in an empirical setting in which the employees are vital
if the company is to remain competitive, the firms belong to the same industry and the
primary activities involved are the delivery of services to the customers. These
requirements have made an important contribution to assuring the study of HR practices
in a context which is free of any intervening factor that could possibly produce
misleading findings, such as those derived from non-labor intensive industries or multi-
industry samples. A further requirement was that the firms had to be constrained by an
unusual environment which forced them to adopt certain predictable HR systems, along
Page 34
33
with providing the researchers with an opportunity to carry out hypotheses testing
within the context of a distinctive empirical setting.
The banking industry met the requirements of being a well-defined, labor-
intensive, service industry, whereas the Spain-based banking institutions met the
requirements of being highly distinctive in comparison to their European counterparts as
a result of the widespread universal banking model, the dense retail channel network
and accompanying small-sized branches, and the attractive competitive structure. Each
of these distinguishing characteristics which prevail in Spain has forced its banking
institutions to adopt an HR systems based on three clearly identifiable directions: (a) the
internal development of HRs, (b) the organic management of HRs, and (c) the relational
manner of dealing with employees. Interestingly, these three HR systems are not only
consistent with the Spanish banking industry’s distinguishing features but they are also
confirmed by the evidence derived from this study. In fact, the factor analysis has
revealed the presence of three sets of mutually reinforcing HR practices, which have
subsequently been labeled as make-based practices, organic practices and relational
practices.
An analysis of the performance impact of these three HR systems has led to the
discovery that empirical support for a contingency relationship exists, since defender
banking institutions which adopt make-based and relational practices attain more benefit
than do prospector banking institutions.
9. Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their insight, ideas and comments
on this paper. The authors acknowledge the financial support of this research from the
Spanish Commission for Science and Technology (TSI2005-08225-C07-07) and the
Page 35
34
Castilla-La Mancha Regional Government (AEC08-066 and PII1I09-0268-8514). Each
author has contributed equally to the paper.
10. Notes
1 The following specific techniques have been employed: (a) Applying the paragraph method in terms
similar to those used to determine the business strategy (Bird and Beechler, 1995); (b) Adding the number
of high-performance HR practices implemented by a firm (Wright, Gardner and Moynihan, 2003), which
can be easily used with dichotomous variables and adapted to continuous scales by considering the
median as the cut-off point (Delaney and Huselid, 1996); (c) Using a factor analysis that permits the
identification of different dimensions of the HR system (Boselie et al., 2003; Huselid, 1995); (d)
Constructing a single index resulting from the addition of mean scale values pertaining to a group of
determined practices, such as selection, training, development, retribution and design of positions. (Bae
and Lawler, 2000; Datta, Guthrie and Wright, 2005); (e) Using a cluster analysis with the purpose of
identifying homogeneous groups of HR practices or groups of firms adopting similar HR practices
(Arthur, 1994; Becker and Gerhart, 1996).
2 Firms with scores of 1 and 2 were therefore classified as defenders, those with scores ranging from 3 to
5 were classified as analyzers and those with scores of 6 and 7 were classified as prospectors, as proposed
by Shortell and Zajac (1990) and later applied by Peck (1994) and Bird and Beechler (1995).
3 Specifically, they were asked to report to what extent these organizational objectives had been achieved
in the last three years.
4 Although the coefficient estimate signs are similar to those predicted, the symmetric hypotheses do not
obtain empirical support, namely the negative performance consequences of adopting these two HR
systems when the banking institution follows a prospector strategy (thus not supporting Hypotheses 4a,
4b and 4c).
5 In order to compensate for this problem, we made the decision to choose the most relevant variable in
explaining performance in the banking industry, such as the banking institution’s size, which is a proven
proxy for economies of scale and scope (Altunbas and Molyneux, 1996a, 1996b) and is closely related to
organizational complexity (Zúñiga and Vicente, 2006), market power (Maudos, 1998) and benefits
deriving from technical change (Altunbas, Goddard and Molyneux, 1999).
Page 36
35
6 In an additional analysis (not shown) and consistent with earlier findings in the European banking
industry, the institutional type of the banking firm did not contribute towards explaining organizational
performance variation (Atunbas and Chakravarthy, 1998; Fernández de Guevara and Maudos, 2002).
Page 37
36
TABLE 1.
Summary of Findings from Universalistic Empirical Research
STUDY PERFORMANCE MEASURES COUNTRY INDUSTRY N STATISTICAL
TECHNIQUE
EMP.
SUPPORT
McDuffie (1995) Productivity and quality VARIOUS Automobile 62 Regression Analysis Yes
Delery y Doty
(1996) ROA and ROE USA Banking 1050
Correlation Analysis
Regression Analysis
Cluster Analysis
Yes
Huselid and Becker
(1996) GRATE and Tobin's Q USA Various 218 Regression Analysis Yes
Kalleberg, Knoke,
Marsden and
Spaeth (1996)
Subjective measures of market
performance USA Various 629
Cluster Analysis
Regression Analysis Yes
Huselid, Jackson
and Schuler (1997) Productivity, GRATE and Tobin's Q USA Various 297
Factorial Analysis
Correlation
Regression Analysis
Yes
Ichniowski, Shaw
and Prennushi
(1997)
Productivity and quality USA Steel 36 Regression Analysis Yes
Liouville and
Bayad (1998)
Satisfaction, turnover and absenteeism,
productivity, quality, market shares,
number of clients and profit
FRANCE
Various 271
Factorial Analysis
Correlation Analysis Yes
Ichniowski and
Shaw (1999) Productivity and quality USA and JAPAN Steel 41 Regression Analysis Yes
Lee and Miller
(1999) ROA KOREA Various 129 Regression Analysis No
Applebaum,
Bailey, Berg and
Kalleberg (2000)
Productivity, quality and costs. USA Various 40 y
4374 Regression Analysis Yes
Ramsay, Scholarios
and Harley
(2000)
Subjective measures of productivity,
financial performance, quality,
absenteeism, turnover and changes in
labor costs
UNITED
KINGDOM Various
1.400
y
15000
Cluster Analysis
Correlation Analysis
Regression Analysis
Partial
Guthrie (2001) Productivity NEW ZEALAND Various 164 Correlation Analysis
Regression Analysis Yes
Michie and
Sheehan (2001)
Subjective measures of financial
performance and innovation
UNITED
KINGDOM Various 240 Regression Analysis Yes
Batt (2002) Turnover and sales growth USA Call Centers 270 Correlation Analysis
Regression Analysis Yes
Batt, Colvin and
Keefe (2002) Turnover USA Telecommunications 302
Correlation Analysis
Regression Analysis Yes
Björkman and
Xiucheng (2002)
Subjective measures of profitability,
market share and sales CHINA Various 62
Correlation Analysis
Regression Analysis Yes
Gelade e Ivery
(2003)
Work climate, sales, customer
satisfaction and staff retention
UNITED
KINGDOM Banking 137
Correlation Analysis
EEM Yes
Guest, Michie,
Conway and
Sheehan (2003)
Turnover, productivity and profitability.
Subjective measures of productivity and
financial performance
UNITED
KINGDOM Various 366
Correlation Analysis
Regression Analysis Yes
Li (2003) Turnover, profitability and productivity CHINA Various 296 Correlation Analysis
Regression Analysis Yes
Molina y Ortega
(2003)
Turnover, employee satisfaction and
customer satisfaction SPAIN Various 405 ANOVA Yes
Wright, Gardner,
Moynihan y Allen
(2003)
Commitment, productivity, profitability,
quality, operating expenses and
shrinkage
USA and
CANADA Restaurants 45
Correlation Analysis
Regression Analysis Yes
Bartel (2004) Growth rate of deposits and loans USA Banking 330
Correlation Analysis
Regression Analysis Yes
Hartog and Verbug
(2004)
Subjective measures of business and
market performance, turnover,
absenteeism and predisposition towards
the work
NETHERLANDS Various 175
A. factorial
Correlation Analysis
Regression Analysis
Yes
Saá
and García Falcón
(2004)
Profitability and organizational
capabilities SPAIN Savings Banks 30
Factorial y Cluster
Analysis
Post-hoc
contrasts(Turkey,
Scheffé, Wallis)
Partial
Page 38
37
TABLE 2.
Summary of Findings from Contingency Empirical Research
STUDY
PERFORMANCE
MEASURES COUNTRY INDUSTRY N
STRATEGY
TIPOLOGY
STATISTICAL
TECHNIQUE
EMP.
SUPPORT
Arthur (1994) Turnover, productivity and
quality USA
Steel
minimills 30 PORTER
Cluster Analysis
Correlation Analysis
Regression Analysis
Yes
Huselid (1995) Turnover, productivity, GRATE
and Tobin's Q USA Various 968 PORTER
Factorial Analysis
Correlation Analysis
Regression Analysis
No
Delery y Doty
(1996) ROA and ROE USA Banking 1050
MILES AND
SNOW
Correlation Analysis
Regression Analysis
Cluster Analysis
No
Bae and Lawler
(2000)
Satisfaction, commitment and
subjective measurements of
market performance
KOREA Various 138 PORTER Correlation Analysis
Regresión Analysis Yes
Khatri (2000) Subjective measures of financial
and non-financial performance SINGAPUR Various 204 MILES AND
SNOW
Correlation Analysis
Regression Analysis
ANOVA
Partial
Bayo and Merino
(2002)
Efficiency, quality and speed of
response SPAIN Various 719 PORTER
Cluster Analysis
PROBIT No
Guthrie, Spell and
Nyamori (2002) Productivity NEW ZEALAND Various 137 PORTER
Correlation Analysis
Regression Analysis Yes
Bae, Chen, Wan,
Lawler and
Walumbwa (2003)
Subjective measures of business
performance
TAIWAN, KOREA,
SINGAPORE AND
THAILAND
Various 680 PORTER Correlation Analysis
Regressions Analysis No
Chan, Shaffer and
Snape (2004)
Subjective measures of business
and market performance HONG KONG Various 82 PORTER
Correlation Analysis
Regression Analysis No
Page 39
38
TABLE 3
Technical information concerning the sampling and data collection
Population
composition
Private banks, savings
banks and credit unions
Unit of
analysis
Firms
(Corporate headquarters)
Geographic
area
National scope
(Firms based in Spain)
Source of
information
Mail questionnaire
(Survey)
Key
informants
Corporate human
resource managers
Population
size 202
Total sample size
(Sampling procedure)
202
(Census)
Final sample size
(Usable responses) 86
Response
rate 42.5 percent
Sampling error
(Level of confidence)
8.2 percent
(95 percent)
Field work
dates
January 2005-
June 2005
Page 40
39
TABLE 4
Measurement scales for HR practices
HR
Practices
Measurement
scale
Number
of items
Internal labor markets Delaney and Huselid (1996) 4
Participation Delery and Doty (1996) 4
Training Snell and Dean (1992) 7
Broad job design Delery and Doty (1996) 4
Rewards Saura and Gómez-Mejía (1996) 5
Job stability Delery and Doty (1996) 4
Rigorous selection Snell and Dean (1992) 5
Page 41
40
TABLE 5
Factor analysis of HR practices
HR
Practices
Factor
1
Factor
2
Factor
3
Communalities
Scores
Internal labor markets .825 .857
Participation .713 .769
Training .691 .731
Broad job design .816 .794
Rewards .785 .770
Job stability .887 .824
Rigorous selection .856 .811
Percentage of variance explained = 84.2 percent
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy = .725
Barlett sphericity test (chi-squared) = 158.081 (p= .000).
Page 42
41
TABLE 6
Descriptive Statistics and Pearson Correlation Coefficients (n=86)
Descriptives Pearson Correlation
Variable Mean SD 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
1.
Firm
size(1) 1.90 .70 1.000
2.
Relational
Factor 4.84 1.42 0.126 1.000
3.
Make-based
Factor 4.69 1.22 0.131 0.060 1.000
4.
Organic
Factor 3.85 1.23 0.169 -0.136 -0.119 1.000
5.
Prospector
strategy(2) .17 . 0.090 -0.157 -0.101 0.161 1.000
6.
Defender
strategy(2) .60 . -0.106 0.159 0.259* -0.125 -0.841** 1.000
7.
Business
performance 4.96 1.73 0.535** 0.426** 0.489** 0.397** -0.112 0.143 1.000
** p < 0.01 (two-tailed); * p < 0.05 (two-tailed); + p < 0.10 (two-tailed) (1) Natural logarithm of number of employees. (2) The Pearson correlation coefficient is shown since the Kendall and Spearman correlations offered similar results.
Page 43
42
TABLE 7
OLS linear regression with interactions (Dependent variable: Organizational performance)
Non-standardized Coefficient (Standard Deviation)
Effect Variable Model [1]
Baseline
Model [2]
HR
Model [3]
BS
Model [4]
HR+BS
Model [5]
Interaction 1
Model [6]
Interaction 2
Model [7]
Interaction 3
Firm
Attributes
Constant 12.256**
(1.898)
10.856**
(1.767)
10.561**
(1.764)
09.584**
(1.757)
8.478**
(1.655)
7.412**
(1.482)
7.146**
(1.466)
Firm
size
03.542**
(0.761)
03.149**
(0.790)
2.876**
(0.742)
02.965**
(0.893)
2.776**
(0.893)
2.786**
(0.948)
2,689**
(0.950)
HR
Systems
Relational
factor
0.189*
(0.089)
0.174*
(0.092)
0.089+
(0.068)
0.169*
(0.092)
0.068
(0.130)
Make-based
Factor
0.203*
(0.092)
0.196*
(0.090)
0.146*
(0.081)
0.178*
(0.093)
0.023
(0.083)
Organic
Factor
0.175*
(0.093)
0.098
(0.089)
0.002
(0.020)
0.005
(0.025)
0.162
(0.146)
Business
Strategy
Defender
Strategy
0.034
(0.099)
0.073
(0.162)
0.088
(0.130)
0.004
(0.211)
0.007
(0.023)
Prospector
Strategy
-0.0820
(-0.121)
0.023
(0.093)
0.019
(0.082)
0.081
(0.124)
0.112
(0.102)
Interactions
Relational factor ×
defender strategy
0.158*
(0.104)
Relational factor ×
prospector strategy
-0.021
(-0.091)
Make-based factor ×
defender strategy
0.136*
(0.076)
Make-based factor ×
prospector strategy
-0.001
(-0.010)
Organic factor ×
defender strategy
-0.070
(-0.137)
Organic factor ×
prospector strategy
0.036
(0.120)
Goodness
of Fit
F 7.626** 6.985** 3.079** 4.984** 4.767** 4.989** 4.036**
R2 0.083 0.256 0.101 0.275 0.331 0.341 0.295
Adjusted R2 0.072 0.220 0.068 0.219 0.262 0.273 0.222
Change in R2 0.083** 0.173** 0.018 0.018 0.057* 0.067* 0.021
N 86 86 86 86 86 86 86
** p < .01; * p < .05; + p < .10
Page 44
43
References
Aiken, L.S., and West, S.G. (1991) Multiple Regressions: Testing and interpreting
interactions. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
Altunbas, Y. and Chakravarty, S.P. (1998) ‘Efficiency Measures and the Banking
Structure in Europe’, Economics Letters, 60: 205-8.
Altunbas, Y. and Molyneux, P. (1996a) ‘Cost Economics in EU Banking Systems’,
Journal of Economics and Business, 48: 217-30.
Altunbas, Y. and Molyneux, P. (1996b) ‘Economies of Scale and Scope in European
Banking’, Applied Financial Economics, 6: 367-75.
Altunbas, Y., Goddard, J. and Molyneux, P. (1999) ‘Technical Change in Banking’,
Economics Letters, 64: 215-21.
Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P. and Kalleberg, A.L. (2000) Manufacturing
advantage: Why High Performance Work Systems pay off. London: Cornell
University Press.
Arthur, J.B. (1992) ‘The Link between Business Strategy and Industrial Relations
Systems in American Steel Minimills’, Industrial and Labour Relations Review,
45(3): 488-506.
Arthur, J.B. (1994) ‘Effects of Human Resource Systems on Manufacturing
Performance and Turnover’, Academy of Management Journal, 3(37): 670-87.
Bae, J. and Lawler, J.J. (2000) ‘Organizational and HRM Strategies in Korea: Impact on
Firm Performance in an Emerging Economy’, Academy of Management Journal,
43(3): 502-17.
Page 45
44
Bae, J., Chen, S., Wan, T.W., Lawler, J.J. and Walubwa, F.O. (2003) ‘Human Resource
Strategy and Firm Performance in Pacific Rim Countries’, International Journal
of Human Resource Management, 14(8): 1308-32.
Balkin, D.B. and Gómez Mejía, L.R. (1990) ‘Matching Compensation and
Organizational Strategies’, Strategic Management Journal, 11(2): 153-69.
Barney, J. and Wright, P.M. (1998) ‘On Becoming a Strategic Partner: The Roles of
Human Resources in Gaining Competitive Advantage’, Human Resource
Management, 37(1): 31-41.
Bartel, A.P. (1994) ‘Productivity Gains from the Implementation of Employee Training
Programs’, Industrial Relations, 33(4): 411-25.
Bartel, A.P. (2004) ‘Human Resource Management and Organizational Performance:
Evidence from Retail Banking’, Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 57(2):
181-203.
Batt, R. (2002) ‘Managing Customer Services: Human Resource Practices, Quit Rates,
and Sales Growth’, Academy of Management Journal, 45(3): 587-97.
Batt, R., Colvin, A.J. and Keefe, J. (2002) ‘Employee Voice, Human Resource
Practices, and Quit Rates: Evidence from the Telecommunications Industry’,
Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 55(4): 573-94.
Bayo, A. and Merino J. (2002) ‘Human Resource Management, Strategy and
Operational Performance in the Spanish Manufacturing Industry’, Management,
5(3): 175-99.
Becker, B.E. and Huselid, M.A. (1998) ‘High Performance Work Systems and Firm
Performance: A Synthesis of Research and Managerial Implications’. In Ferris,
Page 46
45
G. R. (Eds.), Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 16: 53-
101. Greenwich, JAI Press.
Bird, A. and Beechler, S. (1995) ‘Links between Business Strategy and Human
Resource Management Strategy in U.S.-Based Japanese Subsidiaries: An
Empirical Investigation’, Journal of International Business Studies, 26: 23-45.
Björkman, I. and Xiucheng, X.C. (2002) ‘Human Resource Management and the
Performance of Western Firms in China’, International Journal of Human
Resource Management, 13(6): 853-64.
Boselie, P., Paauwe, J. and Jansen, P. (2001) ‘Human Resource Management and
Performance: Lessons from the Netherlands’, International Journal of Human
Resource Management, 12(7): 1107-25.
Chan, L.M., Shaffer, M.A. and Snape, E. (2004) ‘In Search of Sustained Competitive
Advantage: The Impact of organizational Culture, Competitive Strategy and
Human Resource Management Practices on Firm Performance’, International
Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(1): 17-35.
Cohen J. and Cohen P. (1983) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the
Behavioural Sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Datta, D.K., Guthrie, J.P. y Wright, P.M. (2005) ‘Human Resource Management and
Labor Productivity: Does Industry Matter?’, Academy of Management Journal,
48(1): 135-45.
Delaney, J.T. and Huselid, M.A. (1996) ‘The Impact of Human Resource Management
Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance’, Academy of
Management Journal, 39(4): 949-69.
Page 47
46
Delery, J.E. (1998) ‘Issues of Fit in Strategic Human Resource Management:
Implications for Research’, Human Resource Management Review, 8(3): 289-
310.
Delery, J.E. and Doty, D.H. (1996) ‘Modes of Theorizing in Strategic Human Resource
Management: Tests of Universalistic, Contingency, and Configurational
Performance Predictions’, Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 802-35.
Dess, G.G. and Robinson, R.B. (1984) ‘Measuring Organizational Performance in the
Absence of Objective Measures: The Case of the Privately-Held Firm and
Conglomerate Business Unit’, Strategic Management Journal 5(3): 265-73.
Fernández de Guevara, J. and Maudos, J. (2002) ‘Inequalities in the Efficiency of the
Banking Sectors of the European Union’, Applied Economics Letters, 9: 541-44.
Fernández de Guevara, J. and Maudos, J. (2004) ‘Measuring Welfare Loss of Market
Power: An Application to European Banks’, Applied Economics Letters, 11:
833-36.
Fernández de Guevara, J., Maudos, J. and Pérez, F. (2005) ‘Market Power in European
Banking Sectors’, Journal of Financial Services Research, 27: 109-37.
Fitz-Enz, J. (1993) ‘The Truth about Best Practice’, Human Resource Planning, 16(3):
19-26.
Flood, P.C., Guthrie, J.P., Wenchuan, L., Armstrong, C., MacCurtain, S., Mkamwa, T.
and O’Regan, C. (2008) New Models of High Performance Work Systems. The
Business Case for Strategic HRM, Partnership and Diversity and Equality
Systems. Dublin: Equality Authority and National Centre for Partnership &
Performance
Page 48
47
Gelade, G.A. and Ivery, M. (2003) ‘The Impact of Human Resource Management and
Work Climate on Organizational Performance’, Personnel Psychology, 56(2):
383-404.
Gerstein, M. and Reisman, H. (1983) Strategic Selection: Matching Executives to
Business Conditions”’, Sloan Management Review, 24(2): 33-49.
Guest, D., Michie, J., Conway, N. and Sheehan, M. (2003): ‘Human Resource Management
and Corporate Performance in the UK’, British Journal of Management, 41(2): 291-314.
Guthrie, J. (2001) ‘High Involvement Work Practices, Turnover and Productivity:
Evidence from New Zealand’, Academy of Management Journal, 44(1): 180-92.
Guthrie, J.P., Spell, C.S. and Nyamori, R.O. (2002) ‘Correlates and Consequences of
High Involvement Work Practices: The Role of Competitive Strategy’,
International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(2): 183-97.
Hartog, D.N. and Verburg, R.M. (2004) ‘High Performance Work Systems,
Organizational Culture and Firm Effectiveness’, Human Resource Management
Journal, 14(1): 55-78.
Huselid, M.A. (1995) ‘The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on
Turnover, Productivity and Corporate Financial Performance’, Academy of
Management Journal, 38(3): 635-72.
Huselid, M.A. and Becker, B.E. (1996) Methodological Issues in Cross-sectional and
Panel Estimates of the Human Resource-Firm Performance Link’, Industrial
Relations, 35(3): 400-22.
Huselid, M.A., Jackson, S.E. and Schuler, R.S. (1997) ‘Technical and Strategic Human
Resource Management Effectiveness as Determinants of Firm Performance’,
Academy of Management Journal, 40(1): 171-89.
Page 49
48
Ichniowski, C. and Shaw, K. (1999) ‘The Effects of Human Resource Management
Systems on Economic Performance: An International Comparison of U.S. and
Japanese Plants’, Management Science, 45(5): 704-21.
Ichniowski, C. and Shaw, K. (2003) ‘Beyond Incentive Pay: Insiders' Estimates of the
Value of Complementary Human Resource Management Practices’, Journal of
Economic Perspectives, 17(1): 155-80
Ichniowski, C., Shaw K. and Prennushi G. (1997) ‘The Effects of Human Resources
Management Practices on Productivity: A Study of Steel Finishing Lines’,
American Economic Review, 87(3): 291-314.
Jaccard, J. and Turrisi, R. (2003) Interaction Effects in Multiple Regressions. Thousand
Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
Kalleberg, A.L., Knoke, D., Marsden, P. and Spaeth, J. (1996) Organizations in
America: Analyzing their Structures and Human Resource Practices. London:
Sage Publications.
Khatri, N. (2000) ‘Managing Human Resource for Competitive Advantage: A Study of
Companies in Singapore’, International Journal of Human Resource
Management, 11(2): 336-65.
Lee, J. and Miller, D. (1999) ‘People Matter: Commitment to Employees, Strategy and
Performance in Korean Firms’, Strategic Management Journal, 20(6): 579-93.
Lei, D. Slocum, J.W. and Slater, R.W (2000) ‘Global Strategy and Reward Systems:
The Key Roles of Management Development and Corporate Culture’,
Organizational Dynamics, 19(1): 27-41.
Page 50
49
Lengnick-Hall, M. and Lengnick-Hall, C. (1988) ‘Strategic Human Resource
Management: A Review of the Literature and a Proposed Typology’, Academy
of Management Review, 13(3): 454-70.
Lengnick-Hall, M., Lengnick-Hall, C., Andrade, L. and Drake, B. (2009) ‘Strategic
Human Resource Management: The Evolution of the Field’, Human Resource
Management Review, 19(2): 64-85.
Lepak, D.P. and Snell, S.A. (1999) ‘The Human Resource Architecture: Toward a
Theory of Human Capital Allocation and Development’, Academy of
Management Review, 24(1): 31-48.
Lepak, D.P., Takeuchi, R. and Snell, S.A. (2002) ‘Examining the Human Resource
Architecture: The Relationships Among Human Capital, Employment, and
Human Resource Configurations’, Journal of Management, 28(4): 517-43.
Li, J. (2003) ‘Strategic Human Resource Management and MNE´s Performance in
China’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(2): 157-73.
Liouville, J. and Bayad, M. (1998) ‘Human Resource Management and Performances:
Proposition and Test of a Causal Model’, Human Systems Management, 17(3):
183-92.
MacDuffie, J.P. (1995) ‘Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance:
Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto
Industry’, Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 48(2): 197-221.
Más, F.J., Nicolau, J.L. and Ruiz, F. (2005) ‘Asymmetric Rivalry between Strategic
Groups: Response, Speed of Response and Ex Ante vs. Ex Post Competitive
Interaction in the Spanish Bank Deposit Market’, Strategic Management
Journal, 26: 713-45.
Page 51
50
Maudos, J. (1998) ‘Market Structure and Performance in Spanish Banking Using a
Direct Measure of Efficiency’, Applied Financial Economics, 8: 191-200.
Maudos, J., Pastor, J.M. and Pérez, F. (2002) ‘Competition and Efficiency in the
Spanish Banking Sector: The Importance of Specialization’, Applied Financial
Economics, 12: 505-16.
Michie, J. and Sheehan, M. (2001) ‘Labour market flexibility, Human Resource
Management and Corporate Performance.’, British Journal of Management,
12(4): 287-306.
Michie, J. and Sheehan, M. (2001) ‘Labour Market Flexibility, Human Resource
Management and Corporate Performance’, British Journal of Management,
12(4): 287-306.
Miles, R.E. and Snow, C.C. (1978) Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process.
New York: McGraw-Hill.
Miles, R.E. and Snow, C.C. (1984) ‘Designing Strategic Human Resource Systems’,
Organizational Dynamics, 13(1): 36-52.
Molina, J.A. and Ortega, R. (2003) ‘Effects of Employee Training on the Performance
of North-American Firms’, Applied Economics Letters, 10(9): 549-52.
Peña, I. (2006) Eficiencia de la Dirección de Recursos Humanos en el Sector
Financiero de la Economía Social. Doctoral Thesis: University of Castilla-La
Mancha
Pfeffer, J. (1994) Competitive Advantage Through People. Boston: Harvard Business
School Press.
Page 52
51
Pfeffer, J. (1998) ‘Seven Practices of Successful Organizations’, California
Management Review, 40(2): 96-123.
Pfeffer, J. and Barron, J. N. (1988) ‘Taking the Workers back out’, Research in
Organizational Behaviour, 10: 257-303.
Porter, M.E. (1980) Competitive Strategy. New York: The Free Press.
Porter, M.E. (1985) Competitive Advantage. New York: The Free Press.
Purcell, J. (1999) ‘Best Practice and Best Fit: Chimera or cul-de-sac’, Human Resource
Management Journal, 9(3): 26-41.
Ramsay, H., Scholarios, D. and Harley, B. (2000) ‘Employees and High-Performance
Work Systems: Testing inside the Black Box’, British Journal of Industrial
Relations, 38(4): 501-31.
Saá, P. and García-Falcón, J.M. (2004) ‘The Influence of Human Resource
Management in Savings Bank Performance’, Service Industries Journal, 24(2):
51-66.
Schuler, R.S. and Jackson, S.E. (1987a) ‘Linking Competitive Strategies with Human
Resource Management Practices’, Academy of Management Executive, 1(3):
207-19.
Schuler, R.S and Jackson, S.E. (1987b) ‘Organizational Strategy and Organizational
Level as Determinants of Human Resource Management Practices’, Human
Resource Planning, 10(3): 125-41.
Shortell, S.M. and Zajac, E.J. (1990) ‘Perceptual and Archival Measures of Miles and
Snow’s Strategic Types: A Comprehensive Assessment of Reliability and
Validity’, Academy of Management Journal, 33(4): 817-32.
Page 53
52
Snell, S. (1992) ‘Control Theory in Strategic Human Resource Management: The
Mediating Effect of Administrative Information’, Academy of Management
Journal, 35(2): 292-327.
Venkatraman, N. (1989) ‘The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Toward Verbal and
Statistical Correspondence’, Academy of Management Review, 14(3): 423-44.
Verburg, R., Hartog, D.N. and Koopman, P. (2007) ‘Configurations of Human Resource
Management Practices: A Model and Test of Internal Fit’, International Journal
of Human Resource Management, 18(2): 184-208.
Vives, X. (1990) ‘Deregulation and Competition in Spanish Banking’, European
Economic Review, 34: 403-11.
Walton, R. (1985) ‘From Control to Commitment in the Workplace’, Harvard Business
Review, 63(2): 77-84.
Whitener, E. (2001) ‘Do “High Commitment” Human Resource Practices Affect
Employee Commitment?: A Cross-Level Analysis Using Hierarchical Linear
Modelling’, Journal of Management, 27(5): 515-35.
Wood, S. (1999) ‘Human Resource Management and Performance’, International
Journal of Management Reviews, 1(4): 67-413.
Wright, P.M., Gardner, T.M. and Moynihan, L.M. (2003) ‘The Impact of HR Practices
on the Performance of Business Units’, Human Resource Management Journal,
13(3): 21-36.
Wright, P.M., McMahan, G.C. and McWilliams, A. (1994) ‘Human Resources and
Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based Perspective’,
International Journal of Human Resource Management, 5(2): 301-26.
Page 54
53
Youndt, M.A., Snell, S.A., Dean, J.W. and Lepak, D.P. (1996) ‘Human Resource
Management, Manufacturing Strategy and Firm Performance’, Academy of
Management Journal, 39(4): 836-66.
Zúñiga, J.A. and Vicente, J.D. (2006) ‘Strategic Moves and Organizational Survival in
Turbulent Environments: The Case of Spanish Banks (1983-97)’, Journal of
Management Studies, 43: 485-519.
Zúñiga, J.A., Fuente, J.M. and Suárez, I. (2004) ‘Dynamics of the Strategic Group
Membership-Performance Linkage in Rapidly Changing Environments’, Journal
of Business Research, 57: 1378-90.