Page 1
Business social network:
an “age levelling”
service ?
Business social network:
an “age levelling”
service ?
Ivana [email protected]
Chiara [email protected]
Media+Generations
ConferenceUniversità Cattolica
del Sacro Cuore
Saturday 12 September 2009
Page 2
Business social
networkNETWORKis something that is constituted of nodes (vertices) and ties (edges). Network NOT networking.
SOCIAL networkis a network, where the actors represent nodes and the ties represent the relations between them. They can be personal or professional.
BUSINESS social networkare services that focus on the building and maintenance of professional social network. They can be online or in person.
Business social network SITES (BSNSs)are web-based services that allow individuals to make visible their professional social networks
Page 3
(some) Theoretical
AssumptionBusiness social networks:
• The strength of weak ties
(Granovetter 1973)
• Structural holes (Burt 1992)
• Social resources (Lin 2001)
• Appropriable/intentional social
organizations (Coleman 1990)
(Business) SNSs:
• Internet as a social space (Baym
2006)
• SNSs are primarily organized
around people, not interests �
egocentric network, not
communities (Wellman, 1988).
• SNSs are dynamic systems
(Haythornthwaite 2000)
• Public display of connection as
identity signal (Donath and Boyd
2004)
Page 4
Our research
Approachexplorative analysis
Aimto analyse how social capital is intentionally created/mobilised in business social networks (on line and in person)
Methodparticipant observation + survey + semi-structured interviews
Business social networks Milan IN/LinkedIn + BNI, Xing
Page 5
The survey
5387interviews
1674respondents( 31%)
Online
questionnaire
May 15th-22nd,
2009
60 questions
Page 6
Threeresearch
questions
Page 7
Does age influence
the choice to join a business social network?
Page 8
Registration
Age
influence:
YES
Age
influence:
YES
Page 9
InterviewsParticipants here tend to be more
experienced, which is not linked to age,
gender or ethnicity.
(LinkedIn Q&A, man, consultant)
I can't say that I've even thought about it,
so I'd say no. Social media is an equalizer
in that respect; what matters is what you
know, how you share, and the time you
put into it.
(LinkedIn Q&A, man, General Manager at
Web Industries)
With this tools age differences do not
exist. When you meet someone in
person, age is something that affects the
relationship, with LinkedIn the first
impression is not based on age and
even when you meet off line, age
continues to be irrelevant.
(Milan IN, man, temporary manager, 71
years old)
I do it on purpose: I dress in a way that
makes me appear older, I have grown a
beard for that reason. Because
otherwise you don’t work. Via internet
you don’t need it.
(Milan IN, man, entrepreneur, 22 years
old)
Page 10
Other features
Personal79% men
80% graduated (39% of them have a post degree)
47% live and 58% work in Milan
Professional65% employed, 18% entrepreneurs, 18% self-employed, only 0,5% retired and 1% students
27% Ict, 19% consultancy
Only 5% are seeking a new job
82% exceed 40 working hours weekly
42% yearly gross income exceeds 60,000 €
Page 11
Does age influence
the way to partecipate?
Page 12
ParticipationLinkedIn65% access the site at least once a week
They have on average 224 contacts
77% have a “open strategy” (connect with
people unknown to them)
30% of connections are online only
Milan IN15% access the site at least once a week
27% attend meetings and events
44% choose the event according to the topic being dealt with
36% participate every time they have the chance to do so
Age influence:
NO
Age influence:
NO
Page 13
Does age influence
the results achieved?
Page 14
Results
Age
influence:
NOAge
influence:
NO
Page 16
1. Business social networks are mainly used by
people born between 1966 and 1978.
2. The younger and older age groups use them to
avoid prejudices linked to age
3. Once they access, there are no generational
differences about the way they participate and the
results achieved
Business social network as an
“age levelling” service
Page 17
� Control group: to compare the members of
business social networks with their collegues
who are not connected
�Social network analysis regarding
connections and recommendations: is there
any generational difference in their social
network structure?
Next steps
Page 18
� Baym, N.K. 2006, “Interpersonal Life Online”, in Lievrouw, L.A. and S.
Livingstone (red.) 2006, The Handbook of New Media, p. 62-76, Sage
Publications Ltd, London, California and New Delhi.
� Wellman, B. (1988). Structural analysis: From method and metaphor
to theory and substance. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social
Structures: A Network Approach (pp. 19–61). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press.
� Haythornthwaite, C. 2000, “Online personal networks”, New Media and
Society, Vol. 2, N. 2, p. 195-226.
� Donath, J., & boyd, d. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT
Technology Journal, 22 (4), 71-82.
� Granovetter, M. (1973). "The Strength of Weak Ties", American
Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78, Issue 6, May 1973, pp. 1360-1380.
� Coleman J. (1990) Foundations of Social theory, Cambridge, Harvard
University Press.
� Burt R. (1992) Structural Holes, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
� Lin, N. (2001), Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action
, New York, Cambridge University Press.
References