Business Lecture - Graphene: March 2012

Graphene: Cambridge

Network business lecture

Wednesday 14th March 2012

©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

CambridgeIP

Quentin Tannock (Chairman, CambridgeIP)

1

• An increasingly crowded patent landscape around graphene.

• From around 2007 we observe a ‘spike’ in the number of patent

applications both from corporations and academic institutions. • Tannock, Q. Exploiting carbon flatland, Nature Materials, Vol 11, 2-5, (2012)

Graphene patenting trends

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Pre-2001 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Pate

nts

-yearl

y

Number of patents: Annual and cumulative

University/Research Insitituions SMEs Multinational Other

© 2012

Patent numbers in the past two years may be under-represented. Patent applications may remain

unpublished for up to 18 months.

• Across all years, there is a relatively high patent contribution from universities and

research institutes consistent with other relatively early-stage and research-

intensive technology spaces. Table 1: Most active inventors with university affiliations or collaborations. Source Tannock, Q. Exploiting

carbon flatland, Nature Materials, Vol 11, 2-5, (2012)

Universities in the graphene patent landscape

Nr Name Nr of

patents

Organisational affiliations in inventor's

Graphene patents

Example patent

number

Example patent title

1 Jae-young

Choi 62

Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Samsung,

Sungkyunkwan University US20110127497A1 Organic Light Emitting Device Using Graphene

2 Hyeon-jin

Shin 43 Samsung, Sungkyunkwan University US20090308520A1

Method For Exfoliating Carbonization Catalyst From

Graphene Sheet, Method For Transferring Graphene

Sheet From Which Carbonization Catalyst Is Exfoliated

To Device, Graphene Sheet And Device Using The

Graphene Sheet

3 Seon-mi

Yoon 39 Samsung, Sungkyunkwan University US20090071533A1

Transparent Electrode Comprising Graphene Sheet,

And Display And Solar Cell Including The Electrode

4 Ilhan A.

Aksay 35

Battelle Memorial Institute, Princeton University,

Vorbeck Materials Corporation US20100096595A1

Functional graphene-polymer nanocomposites for gas

barrier applications

5 Hyun-jong

Chung 34

Samsung, Seoul National University,

Sungkyunkwan University US20110089995A1

Graphene device and method of manufacturing the

same

6 Sun-ae Seo 33


Sungkyunkwan University, The Leland Stanford

Junior University

US20110108521A1 Methods Of Manufacturing And Transferring Larger

Sized Graphene

7 Byung Hee

Hong 28 Samsung, Sungkyunkwan University US20110195207

Graphene Roll To Roll Coating Apparatus And

Graphene Roll To Roll Coating Method Using The

Same for Graphene

8 Yun-sung

Woo 21


Sungkyunkwan University US20110108609 Methods Of Fabricating Graphene Using Alloy Catalyst

8

Robert K

Prudhomm

e

21 Princeton University, Vorbeck Materials

Corporation US20110042813A1 Printed Electronics

9 Rodney S.

Ruoff 20

Graphene Energy Inc., Northwestern University,

Texas Instruments Inc., University of Texas WO2008143829A2 Graphene Oxide Sheet Laminate and Method

9 James M.

Tour 20 University of Texas, William Marsh Rice University US20110059871

Graphene Compositions and Drilling Fluids Derived

Therefrom

10 John S.

Lettow 18

Princeton University, Vorbeck Materials

Corporation US20110049437

Coatings Containing Functionalized Graphene Sheets

and Articles Coated Therewith

Graphene: Selected technology examples

4 ©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

Table 2:

Graphene –

Selected

Journal articles

2000 to 2011. Source: Tannock, Q.

Exploiting carbon

flatland, Nature

Materials, Vol 11, 2-5,

(2012)

Year Author, Title, Journal Representative image

2004 Novoselov et al. "Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films" , Science 306, 666-669

2006 Berger et al. "Electronic Confinement and Coherence in Patterned Epitaxial Graphene", Science 312, 1191-1196

2007 Dikin et al. " Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide paper", Nature 448, 457-460

2009 Li et al. " Large-Area Synthesis of High-Quality and Uniform Graphene Films on Copper Foils", Science 324, 1312-1314

2010 Bae et al. " Roll-to-roll production of 30-inch graphene films for transparent electrodes", Nature Nanotechnology 5, 574–578

2010 Liao et al. " High-speed graphene transistors with a self-aligned nanowire gate", Nature 467, 305–308

US20110269629A1

SUPERCONDUCTING MATERIALS

Assignee: ISIS INNOVATION [GB]

Inventor: GIUSTINO FELICIANO [GB]; FERRARI ANDREA C [GB]; SAVINI GIANLUCA [GB]

Publication Date: 2011-11-03

Abstract: Partially or fully saturated doped graphene materials are found to be superconducting. The saturation is with hydrogen

or halogen. Doping is performed by substitution of carbon atoms or by applying an electric field. Diamond nano-rods are also

found to be superconducting. These materials can be used in electronic devices having a gate.

Example Patent 1: Andrea Ferrari

WO2012013854A1

A GRAPHENE - TITANIUM DIOXIDE ELECTRODE

Assignee: NOKIA CORP [FI]

Inventor: WEI DI [GB]; BOWER CHRIS [GB]; RYHAENEN TEUVO TAPANI [GB]; ANDREW PIERS [GB]

Publication Date: 2012-02-02

Abstract: An electrode comprises graphene, titanium dioxide and a binder, the binder configured to facilitate the binding

together of the graphene and titanium dioxide to form the electrode.

Example Patent 2: Nokia Research Cambridge

• The largest corporate patent portfolios in the graphene patent landscape are held

by Samsung and Sandisk, reflecting industrial interests in semiconductor and

memory-related applications.

• Key differences in corporate research and development (R&D) focus and

commercial strategies can be inferred from corporate patent filings.

Corporations in the graphene patent landscape

Samsung’s graphene

patent network

• Over 120 named

inventors

• University collaborators

include: Hanyang,

Kumoh, Liebig, Stanford,

Seoul, Sungkyunkwan.

Source: Tannock, Q. et al

Patenting flatland: Graphene

Exploitation challenges,

CambridgeIP ,(2012)

Geography of graphene patent filings 2007 and 2011

8

© 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

WIPO 17%

US PTO 55%

CA Canada 1%

European Patents (EPO

& National) 8%

CN China 1%

JP Japan 15%

KR South Korea

1%

Central and South

America 1%

2007

© 2011

WIPO 24%

US PTO 42%

CA Canada

1%

European Patents (EPO

& National) 8%

EAPO/EA Eurasian Patent

Organization 0%

Russia and USSR

0%

CN China 11%

JP Japan 5%

KR South Korea

8%

Other 0%

2011

© 2011

Graphene patent landscape: Asia rising

• Massive increase in patent filings in Asia

• Much of the increase in patent filings in South Korea can be attributed to Samsung’s graphene patent activity. The increase in Chinese patent filings is more difficult to account for. Many Chinese patents were filed in 2011 and full details are not yet in the public domain.

Nanomaterials: Complex and evolving value chain

‘nano’ is a cross-cutting horizontal, not a vertical ‘industry’

Manufacture Integration Distribution

• Cross-cutting horizantal not a vertically integrated industry

• End-markets and applications are likely to remain very diverse – hence no single group of dominant players

• Evolving and disaggregated value chains – its not a vertical, but a horizontal with diverse end-markets and applications

• The value chain is surrounded by key service providers, facility providers, equipment providers and other supporters

• Patents protect every stage in the value chain – these can support and block new entrants in

specific stages and around specific application areas

Tannock, Q. Nanomaterials trends: Evidence from science literature, Nanomaterials 2011 (2011)

Mixtures: Emulsions,

coatings, composites,

components Products: Sports equipment,

seals, drill bits

Services, Facilities, Equipment

Raw materials: e.g. CNT,

quantum dots

R&D: Inventions &

Discoveries, basic and

applied

$$$

$$$

$$$

$$$

$$$

Nanomaterials sub-spaces


• Our nanotech survey aims to identify the key intellectual

property issues facing the nanotechnology community

today. There is an option to receive a summary of survey

results.

• Take the survey:

www.cambridgeip.com/index.php/knowledge-

centre/nanotech-survey

Take the survey: IP issues facing the nanotech community

http://www.cambridgeip.com/index.php/knowledge-centre/nanotech-survey





Contact Details


Ilian Iliev

(CEO and Co-founder)

E: [email protected]

M: +44 (0) 778 637 3965

T: +44 (0)1223 778 846

Corporate office

Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd

8a Kings Parade, Cambridge

CB2 1SJ, United Kingdom

UK: +44 (0) 1223 777 846

Fax: +44 (0) 20 3357 3105

Internet resources Website: www.cambridgeip.com

www.boliven.com

Blog: www.cambridgeip.com/blog

Sign up for our free newsletter

on our home page

Quentin Tannock

(Chairman and Co-founder)


M: +44 (0) 778 621 0305

T: +44 (0)1223 778 846

mailto:[email protected]



Graphene: A fast developing research-enabled

technology space, encompassing a very extensive

set of potential markets and applications. • Graphene is the first 2D crystal discovered, with unusual electronic, optical

and mechanical properties.

• Graphene is of interest across industry fields as diverse as semiconductors

and biotechnology.

• Many graphene technology applications are in sectors which are notoriously

patent and litigation intensive

Examples of graphene applications include:

• Faster computers: More efficient transistors based on graphene could result

in thinner computer chips which use less energy and work faster.

• More sensitive and robust sensors: Biotech sensor devices, environmental

monitoring, oil & gas sensors

• Thinner and flexible displays: Flexible and transparent electronics

• Tougher and more conductive polymer composites: Much like multi-wall

nanotubes (MWNT), graphene polymer composites can make polymers and

other products, like natural rubber, stronger and electrically conductive.

Why graphene?

• Our report ‘Patenting flatland: Graphene – Exploitation

challenges’ builds on research and analysis around

university graphene patent activity, recently presented

in Nature Materials: Tannock, Q. Exploiting carbon

flatland, Nature Materials, Vol 11, 2-5, (2012)

• CambridgeIP research for Nature Materials around the graphene patent

activity and collaborations of universities has been updated and

extended to analyse the entire graphene patent landscape and focus

additionally on the activities of major corporations and leading SMEs.

In addition the report considers the impact of leaders in the publication

of non-patent literature on the patent landscape

• The report is 70 pages long and contains 45 tables and figures

• Our dataset ‘Graphene patents’ is an expert verified

dataset of all graphene patents and patent applications

globally recovered in our research – more than 2,000. All

key patent information fields and all major jurisdictions are

covered.

Patenting flatland: Graphene - Overview

Patent trends over time

Corporate/University R&D networks

http://www.cambridgeip.com/images/cip/1.png

http://www.cambridgeip.com/images/cip/graphenepatenttrands.png

• CambridgeIP brings its significant experience in building

patent-based technology intelligence with leading

technologists and investors to create Technology Profile

Reports.

• CambridgeIP’s patent-based approach provides a

different perspective to understanding investment in

R&D, geographical distribution and size of markets,

market value chains, how a technology area is evolving

and what are the fundamental drivers of its long-term

performance.

• Our analysis helps readers identify and assess those

technologies where commercial value is concentrated.

Patents cost money and significant organisational

resources to secure and maintain. Patents can provide

a useful indication of those technologies that patent

holders are prepared to spend money to protect.

Technology Profile Reports: Overview

Patent trends over time

Patents are inter-related

Corporate/University R&D networks

• Graphene: Key enablers and barriers

• Most important graphene patents

• Top cited patents

• Largest patent families

• Graphene manufacturing techniques

• Timeline highlighting key events in the graphene

patent landscape

• Geographical analysis of patent activity

• Technology component analysis of patent portfolios

• Patent activity and company profiles of leading small and medium sized

enterprises (SMEs) in the graphene space

• Identification of leading major corporations in graphene by number of

patents filed, with example patents

• What to watch for in the graphene patent landscape

• Conclusions and recommendations for investors, researchers and

policymakers

Patenting flatland: Graphene – In our report

Patenting flatland: Graphene – Table of Contents

Table of Contents About CambridgeIP and Technology Profile Reports .......................................................................................................... 0

Other CambridgeIP Reports .......................................................................................................................................... 1

Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................................... 1

Patent-based Intelligence ................................................................................................................................................... 2

Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................... 5

Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................................... 7

Why Graphene? ................................................................................................................................................................. 9

Graphene History and Context ......................................................................................................................................... 12

Graphene, a Nanomaterial .......................................................................................................................................... 13

Graphene Technology ...................................................................................................................................................... 15

Patents in the Graphene flatland ...................................................................................................................................... 18

Who owns the graphene flatland? ............................................................................................................................... 22

Universities and Research Institutes ............................................................................................................................ 26

Sungkyunkwan University............................................................................................................................................ 30

Rice University ............................................................................................................................................................ 31

Manchester University ................................................................................................................................................. 32

Multinational corporations ............................................................................................................................................ 34

Samsung’s graphene patent network........................................................................................................................... 36

Sandisk 3D’s graphene patent network ....................................................................................................................... 38

SMEs .......................................................................................................................................................................... 38

Company profile: Vorbeck Materials Corp.................................................................................................................... 40

Company Profile: Nanotek Instruments Inc. ................................................................................................................. 41

Company Profile: Graphene Industries ........................................................................................................................ 42

Collaborations and licensing relationships ................................................................................................................... 43

Key inventors .............................................................................................................................................................. 43

Geography of patent filings: Graphene ........................................................................................................................ 44

Most frequently cited US patents ................................................................................................................................. 45

Patent families ............................................................................................................................................................. 46

Patent portfolio composition by technologies ............................................................................................................... 48

Most recently filed patents ........................................................................................................................................... 49

Patent trend conclusions ............................................................................................................................................. 52

Recommendations and Conclusions ................................................................................................................................ 53

Key developments to watch for .................................................................................................................................... 55

About CambridgeIP .......................................................................................................................................................... 56

CambridgeIP Executives ............................................................................................................................................. 57

CambridgeIP Products and Services ........................................................................................................................... 58

Appendix 1: Additional analysis of the graphene patent landscape ................................................................................... 59

Appendix 2: Methodology & Detailed Patent Information .................................................................................................. 63

Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................ 63

Patent family explanation and context ......................................................................................................................... 65

Patent IPC Codes ........................................................................................................................................................ 66

Disclaimer and Registered Company Information ............................................................................................................. 68

To read a report overview & table of contents in more details please visit us at http://www.boliven.com/boliven_landscapes/patenting_flatland_graphene

http://www.boliven.com/boliven_landscapes/patenting_flatland_graphene

Access the full report and full dataset here:

• http://www.boliven.com/boliven_landscapes/

patenting_flatland_graphene

Patenting flatland: Graphene – Access



• Appendix: CambridgeIP background & contacts

• Nanotech Case Studies: Examples of past work

• CambridgeIP snapshot

• CambridgeIP experience

• CambridgeIP team

• Contacts

Appendix Outline

18 © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

• Working with CambridgeIP and senior industry experts we developed and implemented a complex patent search strategy

• Results were analysed using our proprietary tools and methods and a focus area for deep analysis was identified

• A workshop was conducted for client executives with our internal experts, assisting interpretation and dissemination of findings

• A key driver was the need to inform our clients’ strategy in this complex and patent intensive space

• Our remit was to assist client executives develop a clear understanding of the existing landscape, identify areas of relative strength &

weakness and existing R&D collaborations, analyse trends and provide statistical information & benchmarking data for use in business

planning and stakeholder reports

Business situation

Our approach

• Identification of fundamental technologies and key actors

• Identification of areas of strength together with technologies applicable to

multiple sectors of application for future focus by our client

• Understanding of recent M&A activity with significant impacts on the

ownership of the UK’s nanotechnology IP assets

• Insights into corporate R&D collaborations - identiifying key players in the

patent space, together with their overlapping relationships

• Independent and fact-based assessments of the client organisations impact

on UK IP assets, valuable in stakeholder reporting

Results and benefits

Senior executives from a publically funded organisation approached CambridgeIP for assistance in mapping a broad section of the UK

nanotechnology space

Client profile

CS 1: Rapid mapping of large nanotech spaces - UK

nanotechnology patent audit


19

• Working with the client’s senior technical and business

representatives we defined the client’s technology and market

spaces

• We identified two technology focus areas of critical

importance to the client’s technology with the client and

performed an IP Landscape report these two areas

• The client was backed by a major UK government funding organisation.

• The CEO of the company required deep intelligence about industry incumbents’ R&D strategy.

• The client also needed independent analysis of the industry’s patent landscape for use in technology licensing negotiations and

structuring a strategic partnership.

Business situation

Our approach

A top UK University spin-out approached us for an IP Landscape report.

Client profile

CS 2: University spin-off, competitor strategy analysis

using patent-based Intelligence

• The resulting patent-based intelligence was used in

negotiations by our client.

• The client felt that the findings on competitors’ patenting

activity helped secure a go-ahead for a joint venture with a

major industry player: “The strategic partner’s reaction to the

report’s findings was startling: immediately inviting us to their

HQ to meet with their Head of Development to finalize an

agreement towards jointly developing a product.”

• The report has also been used by the client when applying for

participation Framework 7 programs, by demonstrating the

client’s deep knowledge of the industry’s patenting trends. Competitor Analysis of Technology Focus in Client's Field

Assignee

Name

Rank by # of

Patents in

Client Tech.

Space

Total #

Patents in

Client Tech.

Space

Year of

entry into

the field

Total Patents

in Overall

Industry

Portfolio

Proportion

of Tech.

Space

5 Year

Growth of

in Focus

Field

Company 1 1 37 1993 6,576 1.6% 48.6%

Company 2 2 25 1998 33 100.0% 56.0%

Company 3 3 19 1997 2,007 7.1% 15.8%

Company 4 4 16 1992 1,646 2.1% 62.5%

Company 5 5 14 1999 840 7.2% 92.9%

Company 6 6 11 1995 8,838 4.1% 63.6%

Company 7 15 6 2003 400 1.8% 100.0%

The example shows how patent data can be

used to analyse the R&D strategy of

competitors, and to develop licensing strategy.

The findings suggest that Company 7 is

aggressively expanding into the client’s field: it

has the highest growth rate of patenting

activity. In turn Company 2 is most dependent

on this field for its strategic success: 100% of

its patents are in the field of focus.



• We audited the client’s patent holdings, developing indexed and cross-referenced patent databases; We defined the client’s space and

identified adjacent spaces, undertaking IP Landscape and benchmarking analysis against the client’s existing portfolio. Business

intelligence and key statistics were extracted using the RedEyeTM suite of tools.

• Sophisticated and well-advised client with good understanding of its IP space and competitors, holding a relatively large patent portfolio.

• Key drivers were to improve understanding of adjacent IP spaces, increase efficiency and structure in IP intelligence gathering activities,

inform investor communications

Business situation

Our approach

• Identified existing, known, players and new entrants to the client’s

core IP space – including newly active academic institutes and

corporations

• Improved organisation of the client’s existing portfolio, laying a

foundation for future portfolio management

• Identified portfolio gaps for our client to plug and areas for

consideration in future patent filings

• Identified technology migration opportunities & threats from

adjacent technology spaces

• Demonstrated client’s dominance of aspects of its IP Landscape

• The client used our independent findings and analysis in

presentations to VC investors, as part of a successful Series C

funding round.


A medium sized VC funded company delivering nano-enabled sensing solutions to the defense and homeland security sectors approached

CambridgeIP for assistance updating their IP portfolio and developing an up-to-date patent landscape

Client profile

CS 3: IP Landscape® - nano-sensor devices


21

• We defined the technology space and implemented a multi-layer

search strategy that aimed at identifying

• licensing candidates

• potential collaboration partners

• key markets & applications

• critical geographical areas

• Information useful to marketing the technology

• Results and recommendations were presented to the client in a

PowerPoint summary report, and cross-referenced Excel dataset

• A workshop with the client's TTO representatives and client’s

academic experts aids understanding and dissemination of results

and recommendations

• Previous market research had not resulted in uptake of the technology by corporate prospects

• A go / stop decision point was imminent as international PCT roll-out of an initial patent application approached

Business situation

Our approach

• 20+ organisations were identified, were categorised by type and

arranged in order of priority for approach by our client

• Marketing objectives and recommendations were made in relation to

each organisation type

• Key geographical markets containing high profile licensing prospects

were identified for addition to PCT designated states lists

• Information on similar approaches, including diagrams, were provided

to client academic experts in a convenient format


A leading UK University asked us to help identify market opportunities for an early stage surgical materials development

Client profile

CS 4: Accelerate licensing strategy development –

early stage surgical materials technology


22






• Contacts

Appendix Outline


Our offerings

©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved 24

IP Landscape® Open innovation Technology

mapping

Technology

market survey

Expert built patent

datasets focused on

your technology

Identify prior art in a

technology space

Uncover inventor &

collaborator networks

Clarify strengths &

weaknesses of patent

portfolios

Confirm freedom to

operate & technology

white space analyses

Support investment

due diligence and

preparation for fund

raising

Understand market

trends

Identify technology

ownership in complex

spaces

Shortlist acquisition

opportunities

Identify overlaps with

your own technology

portfolio

Conduct due

diligence on external

partners

Identify open

innovation

opportunities in your

own and others’ IP

portfolios

CxO compatible

materials, workshops

and seminars

Pinpoint emerging

technology patterns

& hotspots

Understand

technology value

chains

Identify technology

market &

commercialisation

scenarios

Locate prospective

partners, acquisitions

and clients

Information on

partner/acquisition

candidates operating

in your area of

interest

Identify market –

technology niches in

rapidly developing

markets

Inform in-house R&D

strategy

Influence public

sector innovation

support strategies

Prioritise key market

segments and identify

strategic partners &

collaboration

opportunities

Identify in what areas

you need to build an

IP Landscape

Knowledge transfer

portal

Access over 100

million scientific

documents, including

the latest patents

Conduct technology

literature searches

Perform high-level

analytics on patent

data

Collaborative patent

landscaping with

your colleagues

Boliven Landscapes

Access valuable

patent datasets

combined with

industry expert

analyses

CambridgeIP’s technology and knowledge platforms

CambridgeIP’s offerings are based on a combination of:

• Proprietary software and workflow platforms tested through more than 140 real life projects

• A 100 million document database of patent and non-patent literature

• Quality assurance and report standards that ensure consistency in the outputs for our clients

• The Boliven.com online platform of technology literature search and analytics with 8,000+

registered users and 30,000+ unique visitors per month

Boliven.com: a leading portal for R&D and IP professionals RedEye: our software analytics and workflow platform







• Contacts

Appendix Outline


Our clients

27

We have delivered more than 100 projects with leading

organisations: including major corporations, research institutes,

service providers, high-tech SMEs and investors

Selected clients:

… and

other

leading big

pharma


Thought leadership

Selected publications:

CambridgeIP is a recognised thought leader in the technology intelligence

space. Our research has been covered by the Harvard Business Review,

Financial Times, Nature Publishing Group and other leading media. Our

collaborations include Chatham House, University of Sussex and Cambridge

University’s Judge Business School.


Health and life sciences

29

Vaccines Dendritic cell

Recombinant vector T-

cell receptor peptide

vaccines

DNA vaccination

Generics Bio-similars

Re-formulation

Patents expiries

Diagnostics Telehealth

Blood glucose

Heart rate

Blood pressure

Biomarkers

Medical devices Auto-injectors

Inhalers

Endoscopy

Ultrasound

Wound healing

e-Health

Regenerative

medicine Cell therapy

iPSC

Tissue engineering

Cell-based vaccines

Gene therapy Silencing

Tissue targeting

Pharmaceutical

formulations Excipients

Carriers

Liposomes

Propellants

Nanoparticles

Capsules

Active

pharmaceutical

ingredients Biopharmaceuticals

Tissue targeting

Drug conjugation

New chemical entities

Manufacturing

processes Spray drying

Freeze drying

Jet milling

Filling

Packaging

OTC drugs Analgesics

Anti-microbial

Anti- fungal


Clean tech and energy

30

Desalination

and water

sanitation

Refineries,

power gen,

co-gen.

Smart grid

Marine

transport

Clean coal

carbon capture

CO2-EOR

Geothermal

energy

Systems

Advanced

refrigeration

Biomass

Nano devices

& materials

Fuel cells

Concentrated

solar & other

energy storage

systems

Photovoltaic &

component

technologies

Wind energy

systems


Telecommunications and electronics

31

e-Health Remote diagnostics

Device access control

Hardware Card readers

Routers

Mems

Flexible displays

Contactless card

Satellite communications

Telecoms standards ETSI

Continua alliance

RFID

Blue tooth

Near field communication

Radio frequency identification

Geographical systems GIS measurements

Satellite navigation/GPS

Mobile devices/applications E-reader

Mobile search

Application software

Media convergence

3G/4G/WiFi

Internet & data handling Search

Cloud computing

Data fusion

Database replication

Clean tech Smart grid

Smart meters

Transport management

Distributed sensor systems

Energy harvesting

Wireless authentication Physical/Remote access control

Merchant/Purchasing

Digital credentials


Nanotechnology

©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved 32

Environmental

applications Construction materials

Energy storage, generation and

transmission

Water purification

Industrial fields Advanced materials

Automotive, Aerospace

Electronics

Paints & Coatings

Tissue engineering Nano-materials

Nano-fibers

Scaffolds

Nanotoxicity Nanotubes

Nanospheres

Nanoparticles

Risk assessment technologies

Carbon nanotubes CNT, SWNT, DWNT, MWNT

Functionalization

Production

Purification

Nanobiotechnology Bio-compatible nanoparticles

DNA nanotechnology

Nanospheres

Nanoformulations

Nanomaterials CNT

Graphene

Nanoparticles

Nanoparticles Colloidal gold

Iron nanoparticles

Nanostructures

Platinum nanoparticles

Quantum dots

Silver nanoparticles






• Contacts

Appendix Outline


Selected team members

Quentin Tannock

Chairman & co-founder

Ilian Iliev

CEO & co-founder

Arthur Lallement

Senior Associate

Ralph Poole

Boston

Representative

Mark Meyer

Business Development

Manager

North America

Helena van der Merwe

Senior Associate

Vladimir Yossifov

Geneva Representative

Dr Robert Brady

Non-Exec Director

Sarah Helm

Senior Associate

34

Yanjun Zhao

Senior Associate


Key team members 1

Quentin Tannock (Chairman & co-founder)

Quentin leads our work in Nanotechnology, Materials, Health and Investment strategy. He has managed IP Landscape, IP Strategy and M&A and investment strategy projects for multinational corporations, investment groups and leading universities. His IP strategy related work has been covered in Bloomberg, Nature Publishing Group, The Wall Street Journal and elsewhere.

Prior experience: founder of a successful company in the chemical sector; law lecturer; facilitated major R&D collaborations at Cambridge University (Electronics, Photonics & Nanotechnology); member of Lambert working group tasked by government to draft model contracts for industry-university collaborations; IP analysis & strategic advice to nanotechnology venture capitalists; assisting Cambridge University Institute of Biotechnology start-ups (bio-nano diagnostic devices) with commercial and fundraising strategies

Education: Law, (Roman-Dutch, Common Law, International Law in Cambridge & elsewhere)

Ilian Iliev (CEO & co-founder)

Ilian leads our work in Energy & CleanTech and Telecoms areas. Ilian has published widely and has lead IP Landscape and IP Strategy projects for the full range of participants in high-technology sectors. He has assisted multi-national corporations and SMEs with their industrial partnering and fund-raising strategies.

Prior experience: strategy & innovation advisory work for a Magic Circle law firm; award-winning biotech start-up in Cambridge; policy advice; 1990s: founded and ran a 100+ employee business in the electrical industry in Southern Africa

Education: Economics and Management; Ccmpleting a PhD on ‘Innovation Finance’ at the Judge Business School, Cambridge University

Dr Robert Brady (non-Exec. Director)

Prior experience: Founder of Brady plc a leading supplier of transaction and risk management software solutions to companies and banks operating in the metals and minerals, energy and 'soft' commodity sectors. Dr Brady acts as an active mentor and advisor for several growth companies, specializing in information technology and services. He is the current treasurer of Cambridge Angels investment group.

Education: fellow at Trinity College, Cambridge, where he specialized in the field of physics.


Contact Details


Ilian Iliev

(CEO and Co-founder)


M: +44 (0) 778 637 3965

T: +44 (0)1223 778 846

Corporate office

Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd

8a Kings Parade, Cambridge

CB2 1SJ, United Kingdom

UK: +44 (0) 1223 777 846

Fax: +44 (0) 20 3357 3105

Internet resources Website: www.cambridgeip.com

www.boliven.com

Blog: www.cambridgeip.com/blog

Sign up for our free newsletter

on our home page

Quentin Tannock

(Chairman and Co-founder)


M: +44 (0) 778 621 0305

T: +44 (0)1223 778 846




Disclaimer


This document contains data extracted from publicly available sources and documents created by third parties, such as patent data obtained Patent Offices’ databases. CambridgeIP accepts no liability for the accuracy or completeness of the data provided to it from such sources.

The document may include analysis, together with opinions and observations expressed by CIP. They do not constitute legal advice. The Reader should not rely on them to make (or to refrain from making) any decision.

Any decision is the Reader’s sole responsibility and CambridgeIP hereby excludes any and all liability for any loss of any nature suffered by the Reader, or by any colleague, client or customer of the Reader, as a direct or indirect result of use of any of the Report or of the making any business decision, or refraining from making any such decision, based wholly or partly on any data, expression of opinion, statement or other information or data contained in the document.

For the avoidance of doubt it is recorded that CambridgeIP shall not be liable for any indirect, special, incidental, punitive, consequential losses or loss of profits. This limitation of liability shall not apply to injury or death to any person caused by CIP’s negligence (to which no limit applies).

Business Lecture - Graphene: March 2012

Business

graphene device

graphene compositions

graphene energy

graphene patent landscape

university affiliations

northwestern university

graphene hyeonjin2

graphene patenting trends