Business 492 Senior Experience Regina Eisenbach, Ph.D. Jim Hamerly, Ph.D.
Dec 21, 2015
Business 492 Senior Experience
Regina Eisenbach, Ph.D.Jim Hamerly, Ph.D.
The numbers…
This semester we expect to:• engage ~220 students• complete ~49 projects
• The program over 14 years:• Over 1000 projects• Over 4000 students
492 Grade Components
• Weekly quizzes (10% each) 30%
• CSU Business Assessment Test 10%
• Team Contract 10%
• Web CT Discussion Board 10%
• Company & Industry Research Report 30%
• Final Letter of Engagement 10%
(Up from 20%, dropped in class Project Plan)
Matching Companies, Faculty,
and Teams
Matching Companies & Faculty
Company A
Company Candidates
Company A
Selected Companies
Faculty Candidates
Faculty expertise and preferences used to match companies
Appropriatedifficulty leveland relevance usedto select companies
Matching Individuals into Teams
Students self-select into Teams
Matching Companies, Faculty, Teams
Company A
Selected Companies
Matched Faculty
Student Preferences &expertise used to match companies
Bus492 & 493 Timelines
BUS 492/493 TimelinePho
tos
due
Mo
n 1
/14
Tu
es 1
/22
Team
Pro
ject
Pre
fere
nces
due
Th
ur
1/24
Team
Con
tract
due
Fri
2/1
Compa
ny/In
dust
ry R
epor
t &
D
raft
Lette
r of E
ngag
emen
t due
To
day
Fri
1/2
5Pro
ject
s M
ATCHED
one weekto complete
Company/Industry Report
Fri
2/1
5Fi
nal L
ette
r of E
ngag
emen
t due
Mo
n 2
/4Fi
rst m
eetin
g w
ith C
ompa
ny
492 493Te
ams
form
ed
Cla
ss 1
Cla
ss 2
Cla
ss 3
BUS 493 Suggested Timeline
9 weeksto define & complete
research
Mo
n 2
/4Fi
rst m
eetin
g w
ith C
ompa
ny
2/11
8 w
eeks
left
2/18
7 w
eeks
left
2/25
6 w
eeks
left
3/3
5 w
eeks
left
3/10
4 w
eeks
left
3/17
3 w
eeks
left
3/24
2 w
eeks
left
3/31
1 w
eek
left
4/7
2 w
eeks
unt
il re
port
due
4/14
1 w
eek
until
repo
rt du
e
4/21
Draft
repo
rt du
e
2 weeksto complete
report
4/28
5/5
Fin
al R
epor
t &
p
reso
s M
on-T
hurs
5/15
trade
show
2 weeksFor preso &
report
Final
Let
ter o
f Eng
agem
ent d
ue
Key Dates
Friday January 25th • Student teams assigned, Student Team Contracts dueFriday February 1• Company and Industry Report due• Draft Letter of Engagement dueMonday February 4• Students instructed to set up first company meeting
during this weekFriday February 15: Final Letter of Engagement due
493 Grade Components
• Draft Report 20%
• Final Report 15%
• Team Presentation 15%
• Web CT Discussion Board 10%
• Progress Reports 10%
• Peer evaluation 40%
Faculty & Student RatingsSenior Experience Fall 2007
A series of questions was asked of faculty and students who had recently completing a Senior Experience Project. They were asked to rate their agreement or disagreement with a series of statements regarding preparation, abilities,project difficulty, communications, etc.
Example: Students are able to plan effectively[rate from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree]
Limitations: Self-selection bias, non-uniform response, limited sample size [nf = 20, ns = 20]
20071215 v0.65 The works included here are Copyleft by Jim Hamerly, free for use, and requiring that all modified versions of content to be free as well.
My team was able to plan effectively
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Stronglydisagree
Disagree Neutral Agree Stronglyagree
faculty
students
Students have adequate writing skills
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
Stronglydisagree
Disagree Neutral Agree Stronglyagree
faculty
students
Students possess the needed critical thinking skills
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
Stronglydisagree
Disagree Neutral Agree Stronglyagree
faculty
students
Faculty - Student Ratings
-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5
The sponsoring company contact communicates effectively with the faculty
The sponsoring company provides adequate support to the team
The sponsoring company contact communicates effectively with the team
Projects are sufficiently defined when I first see them
Project proposals are at an appropriate level of difficulty
The final project definition approximately matches the initial project definition
Students have adequate pre-requisite knowledge
Students are able to adequately manage their team
Students are able to adequately manage the project
Students possess the needed critical thinking skills
Students have adequate writing skills
Students are able to plan effectivelyFaculty agreed less than students to statements
in the red areas
Students agreed less than faculty to statements
in the blue areas
Student “Good Practices”At the start of the project:• Ensure that your team, faculty adviser, and company contact all have the same
understanding of the projects' definition and objectives.• Decide upon a dominant communication mechanism with your team mates (face-
to-face, WebCT, email, blog, IM, phone, etc.).• Recognize that the bulk of the project must be completed in ~8 wks, not 16.Throughout the project:• Expect communication problems, misunderstandings, and missed commitments
and deal with them immediately. A delayed response is the germination of problems to come.
• Meet weekly with your faculty adviser. Always prepare an agenda for every meeting, in advance of the meeting. Issue meeting minutes immediately afterwards.
• Communicate weekly with your company sponsor through your designated team contact.
Faculty “Good Practices”At the start of the project:• Meet on-site with the sponsor contact before the start of BUS 492, to be clear on
roles and expectations. • Meet with the team in advance of the first meeting with the sponsor contact, also
to be clear on roles and expectations.• Go with the team to the company for the first meeting. This is largely to help the
team leave that meeting with reasonable goals and objectives, so that the team does not over-promise.
• Immediately following the initial meeting with the sponsor contact, meet with the team for another half-hour to debrief and ensure that everyone shares a common understanding of what happened and what are next steps.
Throughout the project:• Meet weekly with the team members.• Speak at least monthly with the company contact.• Encourage student team to apply "Student Best Practices".
Project Categories