Top Banner
BURDEN OF PROOF
24

BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF: When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

Jan 18, 2018

Download

Documents

Stewart Ford

 Burden of Proof: exemplifies the Adversarial nature of our American Criminal Justice System.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF:  When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

BURDEN OF PROOF

Page 2: BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF:  When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

Proof: When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree

of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

State of mind or effect created by presenting testimony, writings and material objects.

Page 3: BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF:  When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

Burden of Proof: exemplifies the Adversarial nature of our American Criminal Justice System.

Page 4: BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF:  When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

Adversarial- The U.S. Court system is considered adversarial

Why?

Page 5: BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF:  When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

Burden of Proof Areas:1) Criminal Guilt / Criminal Negligence: law requires that a person either act

with intent or fail to act and is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Page 6: BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF:  When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

1st

Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: not mere possible doubt absolute certainty not required proof to a reasonable certainty applies to: conviction in a criminal case

Page 7: BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF:  When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

2) Corpus Delicti: the prosecution carries the burden of proof to establish the corpus delicti (elements of the crime).

Page 8: BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF:  When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

Example: Burglary (459 CPC)Prosecution must prove the defendant - a. Entered b. A dwelling or other area specified in statute c. With specific intent (aforethought)d. To commit theft or any felony

Page 9: BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF:  When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

Degree of Proof: prima facie (“on its face” to establish a fact unless contradicted by other evidence.

The law doesn’t permit the corpus delicti to be established solely through an extra judicial statement, such as an admission or confession.

Page 10: BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF:  When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

3) Search and Seizure / Confession / Miranda Issues: These issues are decided in pretrial hearing (1538 or 402 motions)

An illegal search triggers the Exclusionary Rule

Page 11: BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF:  When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

Degree of proof: Preponderance of the Evidence:

A majority of evidence (51%)More evidence for than againstTip the scales one way or another

Page 12: BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF:  When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

Applies to:

Legality of a search and seizureLegality of admissions or confessionsDecision in civil courtSelf-defenseInsanityVoluntary intoxication for the purposes of negating specific intentPreliminary hearing

Page 13: BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF:  When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

4) Jurisdiction: Legal authority of a court to:

Hear a case Render a judgment

Usually Occurs in the County: Where crime occurs

Multi-Jurisdiction (case could be held in): Example: Victim kidnapped in Los Angeles Murdered in San Francisco Body dumped in Santa Rosa

Page 14: BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF:  When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

Change of Venue: Change of the trial location due to:

Pre-trial publicity or particularly heinous crime

Makes it unlikely to select a fair and impartial jury (S.F. dog bite case, Polly Klass, Yosemite)

New location is determined by – California Judicial Council

Page 15: BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF:  When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

5) Double or Former Jeopardy (500 E.C.): Provides that a person who is charged with a criminal act shall be subject

to only one adjudication (final judgment of guilt) Cannot be tried twice for the same offense Hung jury is not double jeopardy – no final judgment Burden lies with the - defendant Degree of proof - preponderance

Page 16: BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF:  When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

Degree of proof: Preponderance of the Evidence:

A majority of evidence (51%)More evidence for than againstTip the scales one way or another

Page 17: BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF:  When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

Exceptions: Dual Sovereignty Doctrine: allows a prosecution on the same offense if:

That offense violates the laws of two separate governmental jurisdiction [Federal and/or State (s)]

Example: Bank Robbery, kidnapping in one state and transports the victim into another state

Page 18: BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF:  When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

Dual Liability Doctrine: prosecution for a criminal offense and litigation for a tort

Civil forfeitures – tort (civil wrong) Asset forfeiture actions

Examples: OJ Simpson, Robert Blake. Battery victim, Rape victim, etc

Page 19: BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF:  When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

6) Self-Defense: Allows a person to commit a legal battery or a justifiable homicide in order to:

Protect oneself Or another from threatened criminal activity

A party about to be injured may use resistance sufficient to:

Prevent the commission of a public offense against his person or family; or

Prevent an illegal attempt by force to take or injure property in his possession

See text for examples

Page 20: BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF:  When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

The Home Protection Act (198.5 PC): Any person using deadly force within his residence is presumed to have acted out of imminent fear of death or great bodily injury to self or another if:

A person unlawfully and forcibly enters the residence, and;

The person using deadly force knew or reasonably believed that an unlawful and forcible entry had occurred

Degree of Proof: preponderanceLies with: defense

Page 21: BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF:  When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

7) Insanity: An insane person is either capable of committing a crime in CA or can be found not guilty by reason of insanity

CA Insanity Rule – a person can be judged insane if he/she by reason of mental defect or disorder is incapable of knowing right from wrong and appreciating the consequences of one’s action this is known as the M’Naughten Rule

Degree of Proof: preponderance

Burden lies with: defendant

Page 22: BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF:  When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

8) Intoxication (550E.C.) Voluntary intoxication is no defense to a general intent crime

In specific intent crimes whenever premeditation, deliberation, or aforethought is necessary as an element of the crime or degree thereof, evidence the accused was voluntarily intoxicated is admissible on the issue as to whether the deft. actually formed a required mental state

Page 23: BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF:  When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

Burden lies with: defendant

Degree of proof: preponderance

Involuntary intoxication (unconscious of the act), is a direct defense to a crime.

Page 24: BURDEN OF PROOF. PROOF:  When the prosecution or defense establishes a degree of belief concerning a fact in the mind of the trier of fact (190 E.C.).

9) Capacity Issues (26PC):

Burden of proof can belong to either the defendant or prosecution depending on the legal issue, example:

Prosecution has burden: Child under 14 yrs. and the degree of proof is clear and convincing

Defense has burden: Mistake of Fact, accident or misfortune and the degree of proof is preponderance