Top Banner
technical report technical report bulletin 31 bulletin 31 fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005 fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005 Post-tensioning in buildings Post Post - - tensioning in tensioning in buildings buildings fib Commission 1 “Structures” Task Group 1.1 “Design Applications” WP 1.1.2 – Post-Tensioning in Buildings J. Almeida, Lisbon J. Camara, Lisbon H. Corres, Madrid T. Friedrich, Zurich M. Miehlbradt, Lausanne J.-M. Voumard, Bern B. Westerberg, Stockholm
24

Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

May 16, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

tech

nic

al r

epor

tte

chn

ical

rep

ort

bulle

tin

31

bulle

tin

31

fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005

Post-tensioning in buildingsPostPost--tensioning in tensioning in buildingsbuildings

fib Commission 1 “Structures”

Task Group 1.1 “Design Applications”

WP 1.1.2 – Post-Tensioning in Buildings

J. Almeida, LisbonJ. Camara, LisbonH. Corres, MadridT. Friedrich, ZurichM. Miehlbradt, LausanneJ.-M. Voumard, BernB. Westerberg, Stockholm

Page 2: Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

tech

nic

al r

epor

tte

chn

ical

rep

ort

bulle

tin

31

bulle

tin

31

fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005

Design teamArchitecte

Structural Designer.......

Contractor

Owner

Page 3: Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

tech

nic

al r

epor

tte

chn

ical

rep

ort

bulle

tin

31

bulle

tin

31

fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005

The potential offered by prestressing is not fully exploited in building structures field.

more architectural freedom / functional advantages

22.14m

St. Gabriel Tower, Lisbon

Page 4: Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

tech

nic

al r

epor

tte

chn

ical

rep

ort

bulle

tin

31

bulle

tin

31

fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005

longer spans / improved flexibility

Parking deck “GAD Munsten”, Switzerland Spans 16.0m x 7.5m

BNC Headquarters, LisbonSpans (4.2m + 11.7m + 4.2m) x 8.1m

The potential offered by prestressing is not fully exploited in building structures field.

Page 5: Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

tech

nic

al r

epor

tte

chn

ical

rep

ort

bulle

tin

31

bulle

tin

31

fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005

slender and lighter floor systems

The potential offered by prestressing is not fully exploited in building structures field.

Fuenlabrada Shopping Center, Spain Spans 12.0m x 12.0mt = 0.32m (0.32m to 0.55m)

BNC Headquarters, LisbonSpans (4.2m + 11.7m + 4.2m) x 8.1mt = 0.22m (0.22m to 0.40m)

Page 6: Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

tech

nic

al r

epor

tte

chn

ical

rep

ort

bulle

tin

31

bulle

tin

31

fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005

Reduced construction time.

The potential offered by prestressing is not fully exploited in building structures field.

Nestle Distribution Center, ChileSlab on ground 150m x 220mConstruction time ≈ 2 months

Page 7: Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

tech

nic

al r

epor

tte

chn

ical

rep

ort

bulle

tin

31

bulle

tin

31

fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005

substantial reduction in the total steel area. ⇒ improved details and easier placing and compacting of concrete.

CORE FOOTINGTENDONS LAYOUT

CORE FOOTING

12A2

3

0.25

1

2 2A

3

3Ø25

Ø32//0.20

Ø32//0.20

Ø25//0.20

Ø25//0.20

Ø25//0.20

13

1

1

3

3

3

3

1

1

3

3

3

3

1

1

13

3

3

3

Ø25//0.20

Ø25//0.20

Ø32//0.20

LONGITUDINAL SECTION

Ø32//0.20Ø25//0.20

2A

2

2 layers Ø40//0.20

1

Ø25//0.20

2

2A

2

2A

2A

2

2A

1

1

1

1

2

2

2A

2A

1

1

1 2A

Ø25//0.20

3Ø25

The potential offered by prestressing is not fully exploited in building structures field.

St. Gabriel Tower – footing, LisbonFsd,u ≈ 21 000 kN/m

S500 (2 layers φ40//0.20) – 25 % total Asprestressing steel – 75 % total As

Page 8: Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

tech

nic

al r

epor

tte

chn

ical

rep

ort

bulle

tin

31

bulle

tin

31

fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005

In many cases in which post-tensioning would provide a visibly superior solution, it happens that a more conventional non-prestressed solution is often selected.

The potential offered by prestressing is not fully exploited in building structures field.

Page 9: Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

tech

nic

al r

epor

tte

chn

ical

rep

ort

bulle

tin

31

bulle

tin

31

fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005

2 POST-TENSIONING IN BUILDINGS2.1 General2.2 Basic concepts of prestressing2.3 Design aspects2.4 Technology of Prestressing in Building

P P

q

q

Pq

a) Axial effect only

b) Eccentric axial effect

c) Axial and transverse effect

P q P+q

Tens

ion

Com

pres

sion

0 0 0

Pee

P

Pe e

Page 10: Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

tech

nic

al r

epor

tte

chn

ical

rep

ort

bulle

tin

31

bulle

tin

31

fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005

2 POST-TENSIONING IN BUILDINGS2.1 General2.2 Basic concepts of prestressing2.3 Design aspects2.3.1 Structural effects and tendon profiles2.3.2 Prestressing force2.3.2.1 Maximum prestress2.3.2.2 Losses of prestress2.3.3 Serviceability limit states (SLS)2.3.4 Ultimate Limit States2.3.5 End anchorage and intermediate anchorages2.3.6 Structural Restraints

L

No significant restraintMax. movement ≈ prop. to L/2

No significant restraintMax. movement ≈ prop. to L

Significant restraint forcesSmall movements

“Wherever the axial effects of the prestress end up, the transverse effects will always act fully on the prestressedmember, and can be accounted for in every aspect of design.“

Page 11: Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

tech

nic

al r

epor

tte

chn

ical

rep

ort

bulle

tin

31

bulle

tin

31

fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005

2 POST-TENSIONING IN BUILDINGS2.1 General2.2 Basic concepts of prestressing2.3 Design aspects2.4 Technology of Prestressing in Building2.4.1 The Monostrand Post-Tensioning System - Unbonded and Sheathed Strand2.4.2 The Bonded Slab Post-Tensioning System2.4.2.1 The Monostrand System2.4.2.2 The Multistrand System2.4.3 Stressing Equipment and Clearance2.4.4 Installation2.4.5 Fire resistance2.4.6 SpecificationsAnnex: Specification Example

Bare strandsCement grout

H =21 mmB= 75 mm

B

HFlat steel duct

Page 12: Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

tech

nic

al r

epor

tte

chn

ical

rep

ort

bulle

tin

31

bulle

tin

31

fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005

15 mm 160 105x75100 110 75

[mm]

100

Strand type

13 mm

XrX

150 90

Anchor dim.YrY

70 110x70

XXr

Y Yr

X

2 POST-TENSIONING IN BUILDINGS2.1 General2.2 Basic concepts of prestressing2.3 Design aspects2.4 Technology of Prestressing in Building2.4.1 The Monostrand Post-Tensioning System with Unbonded and Sheathed Strand2.4.2 The Bonded Slab Post-Tensioning System2.4.2.1 The Monostrand System2.4.2.2 The Multistrand System2.4.3 Stressing Equipment and Clearance2.4.4 Installation2.4.5 Fire resistance2.4.6 SpecificationsAnnex: Specification Example

A

B

C

Centre hole jack Twin ram jack

A [mm] B [mm] 2 strand jack 2 strand jack 4 strand jack

C [mm] rectangular anchor 4 strands 5 strands

square or circular anchor 1 strand 2 strands 4 strands

950 - 1100 70 - 90

110 130

280 400

70 105 115

700 - 1200

60 - 80 - -

300 400

- - -

Anchorage space requirements

Jack clearance requirements

Page 13: Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

tech

nic

al r

epor

tte

chn

ical

rep

ort

bulle

tin

31

bulle

tin

31

fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005

1 INTRODUCTION2 POST-TENSIONING IN BUILDINGS

3 POSTENSIONED FLOORS3.1 Conceptual design3.2 Applications4 POSTENSIONED FOUNDATION4.1 Conceptual design4.2 Applications5 POSTENSIONED TRANSFER SLABS AND BEAMS5.1 Conceptual design5.2 Applications6 PREFABRICATED POST-TENSIONED SOLUTIONS6.1 Conceptual design6.2 Applications

The document covers the more common practical applications in concrete buildings

Page 14: Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

tech

nic

al r

epor

tte

chn

ical

rep

ort

bulle

tin

31

bulle

tin

31

fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005

N N

PP

0

Nsσ

σsN+P

090% of N balanced

60% of N balanced

0% of N balanced

4 POSTENSIONED FOUNDATION4.1 Conceptual design4.1.1 Influence of stiff elements and subgrade friction4.1.2 Raft foundations4.1.3 Post tensioned slab on ground4.2 Applications

0

10

20

0 25 50 75 100 125 150

Bearing Pressure, kPa

L/h

P/A = 0 MPaP/A = 1 MPaP/A = 2 MPa

Basic Concepts

Raft foundations - Preliminary Design

Slabs on ground – Design Criteria

Page 15: Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

tech

nic

al r

epor

tte

chn

ical

rep

ort

bulle

tin

31

bulle

tin

31

fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005

5.2.1. Pacific Place Buildings, Hong Kong

Page 16: Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

tech

nic

al r

epor

tte

chn

ical

rep

ort

bulle

tin

31

bulle

tin

31

fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005

3.2.1.Fuenlabrada Shopping Center, Spain

35 000 m2

Construction time ≈ 3 months(3 000 m2 / week)

Page 17: Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

tech

nic

al r

epor

tte

chn

ical

rep

ort

bulle

tin

31

bulle

tin

31

fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005

3.55

32

3.90

1.55 1.55 8.15 1.55 1.55 8.775 1.55 1.55

50

70

35 4.00

50

2.50

50

2.50 2.50

50

5.25

50

2.50 2.50

50

6.375

50

2.00 2.00

50

3.51

30

60

65

55

30

-3,92

63

63

63

63

1.00

30

16.70

-0,05

3.587

+4,15

55

55

+8,35

4.55

3.90

30

3.50

30+12,15

Section

10.00 11.25 11.87 5 10.00

+18,00

A B C D E

1 2 3 4 5 6

E

C

B

A

6.095 6.095 8.125 11.875 4.055

10.0

011

.25

11.8

7510

.00

D

4.2.1.Foundation raft “P&C Bergisch Gladbach”, Switzerland

City centre area

Original solution - pile-raft foundation

Alternative solution – banded postensioned foundation raft

Page 18: Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

tech

nic

al r

epor

tte

chn

ical

rep

ort

bulle

tin

31

bulle

tin

31

fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005

8 9 10 11 12

E

3.2.4.1Crown Plaza Hotel,Funchal

Solid slab, t = 0.25m, spans ≈ 7.5m

“Local” use of post-tensioning in areas where greater spans (10m to 12m) are needed.

Page 19: Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

tech

nic

al r

epor

tte

chn

ical

rep

ort

bulle

tin

31

bulle

tin

31

fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005

1

A B

2

e=0.16

C

A

D E F

A

6.99

e=0.40

6.88 6.18 6.99 2.58

2.53

3.23

2.68

1.91

e=0.16

e=0.16

e=0.16

e=0.40

e=0.16

e=0.12

e=0.16

e=0.12

4.00

3.30

2.87

67

SECTION A-A

6'

1.62 0.53

2.24

4.75

45

1.00

3

3.05

0.16

0.25

0.22

2.22

1.36 0.12

fp0.1k > 1670 MPafpuk > 1860 MPa

Ordinary Steel: S400

3.23

2 1

0.160.

40

Prestressing Steel

CORBEL GEOMETRY0.12

Concrete: C30

0.40 0.16

PLAN

3.2.4.2“Oeiras House”, LisbonPROBLEM STATEMENT/QUESTION

At the South enter, the corbel have no continuity with the interior slab.

A solid band, free spanning about 13m, has to equilibrate vertical and bending effects induced by the corbel

Page 20: Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

tech

nic

al r

epor

tte

chn

ical

rep

ort

bulle

tin

31

bulle

tin

31

fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005

DETAIL 1

B

F

DETAIL 1

F

A

C, D & E

CABLE A

CABLES C, D & E

CD

EF

BA B

CABLE LAYOUT

DE

C

F

B

F

SECTION A-A (Cables A, C, D and E)

PLAN

B A

CABLES A, B, C, D, E, F - 3 Monostrands (0.6'') - Peff=3x150 kN

1

2

13.06

0.05

0.05

A B DC E

B D

A

fp0.1k > 1670 MPafpuk > 1860 MPa

Ordinary Steel: S400

Prestressing Steel

Concrete: C30

BF

C

A

DE

VIEW

SECTION

3 MonostrandsPeff = 150 kN/strand)

Peff = 150 kN/strand)3 Monostrands

ADOPTED SOLUTION

Prestressing lay-out to balance bending and torsion effects

Design Criteriom – to balance permanent deflections

Unbonded monostrands

3.2.4.2“Oeiras House”, Lisbon

Page 21: Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

tech

nic

al r

epor

tte

chn

ical

rep

ort

bulle

tin

31

bulle

tin

31

fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005

-55-50-45-40-35-30-25-20-15-10-505

d [m

m] g

g+P

RESULT

3.2.4.2“Oeiras House”, Lisbon

Page 22: Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

tech

nic

al r

epor

tte

chn

ical

rep

ort

bulle

tin

31

bulle

tin

31

fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005

K J H Ea

5.375 4.85 4.525

Section with tendon

6.2.2.Platform for a Heliport “KHIB-Ibbenburen”Switzerland

About 20 m above ground level

Extending 5 m over the outside edge of the existing building

Page 23: Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

tech

nic

al r

epor

tte

chn

ical

rep

ort

bulle

tin

31

bulle

tin

31

fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005

Post-tensioning principles and technology can be used in any structure, independently of its importance, covering a wide range of building structural applications, improving the construction quality and promoting concrete as structural material.

Page 24: Bullet31 TAW Budapest 05 - FenixEdu · e=0.12 e=0.16 e=0.12 4.00 3.30 2.87 7 6 SECTION A-A 6' 1.62 0.53 2.24 4.75 5 4 1.00 3 3.05 0.16 0.25 0.22 2. 1.36 0. 1 2 fp0.1k > 1670 MPa fpuk

tech

nic

al r

epor

tte

chn

ical

rep

ort

bulle

tin

31

bulle

tin

31

fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005fib Symposium “Keep concrete attractive” Budapest 2005