Building Project Update January 2009. Contents Recap Options Order of Cost Where do we go from here?

Building Project UpdateJanuary 2009

Contents

• Recap

• Options

• Order of Cost

• Where do we go from here?

Recap

• Space Audit– Started in August 06– Invited all ministries within the church to consider how they

use the building, any limitations it presents and what an ideal building would provide – both now and in the foreseeable future.

Recap Vision for GBCIan Stackhouse March 2006

Focus GroupVision &

Requirements

Developed Vision for GBCIan Stackhouse July 2006

GBC Space Audit

Focus GroupVision &

Requirements

Focus GroupVision &

Requirements

Focus GroupVision &

Requirements

Focus GroupVision &

Requirements

Focus GroupVision &

Requirements

Site options& Constraints

Existing BuildingIssues

GBC PROJECTBRIEF

P r a y e r

Recap

• Open meeting in March 2007– Open to members and non-members to discuss issues

relating to the building and its future

• Project Team– Appointed in June 2007, comprising Ian Stackhouse, Brian

Kirkpatrick, Graham Ball, Bob Manson, Elizabeth Hodkinson, Karen Case-Green & Tim Wears

– Remit to produce a Design Brief based on the space audit and work with architects to present the church with options as to how that brief can be met.

The Brief

FoyerMeeting area

Welcome & CaféReception

MainEntrance

Youth

Sports HallFootball & BasketballVolleyball, Badminton

etc

Pool RoomSofaDVD

Recording studio

Gym

Showers

StudyHomework

Internet

YouthOffice

PODRooms

PODRooms

PODRooms

PODRooms

Student/Gap Year

flats

Coffee

Project Team ‘Terms of Reference’

Building Project Team established to address four key areas:

1. To enlarge the worship space to allow growth whilst still remaining one church.

2. To re-imagine our space to do justice to the whole spectrum of activities i.e. preaching, music, arts, prayer, etc

3. To foster a more integral relationship between the different departments and the way they operate, e.g. between ministry, administration, youth

4. To open up the building so it is more visible and hospitable, more of a public space; for there to be a link between appearance and the message we give.

Appointments

• Interviewed architects and appointed Format Milton

• Appointed Ian Ford as Quantity Surveyor

• Site survey - establish site dimensions and levels

• Flood Risk Assessment - establish what we can & cannot do in relation

to flooding

Aspirational Brief

Options

• Do nothing– Not an option

• Modernise

• Re-use & Extend

• Rebuild

• New build on new site – Against the conviction of the Elders and the membership– Not necessary

Options

• Modernise

– Some work in progress – Furniture, curtains lighting

– Re-fit, decorate, minor changes, no structural changes

– Won’t address design brief or fulfil project team terms of reference

Options• New Build

-basement car park for 34 cars

-large flexible auditorium to seat up to 900

-meeting rooms and admin all on one level

-meets the requirements of the brief

Options• Re-use & Extend

-extended auditorium

-additional floor in games hall

-roof extension to link offices

-reduced parking – 6 spaces

-meets some of the brief

Existing Proposed Extension

Comparative Optionsas existing

new build

re-use & extend

Options

• Re-use & Extend alternative- If we leave the auditorium intact and extend &

renovate the building.

- Feasibility Study 2004

- Update costings

Options – Order of Cost

• Modernise

• Re-use - extended auditorium

• Re-use - 2004 Feasibility Scheme

• Rebuild

£500,000

£7,759,394

£4,278,000

£10,000,000

The Way Forward

•Presentation of results to the Elders

•Review with the Elders

•Elders Day Away

•Where do we go from here?