Top Banner
Building better students by building better college procedures: How community colleges could better convey incentives for school effort Prof. James E. Rosenbaum, Pam Schuetz, Ph.D. and Amy Foran Northwestern University
14

Building better students by building better college procedures: How community colleges could better convey incentives for school effort Prof. James E.

Mar 30, 2015

Download

Documents

Alexys Gamlin
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Building better students by building better college procedures: How community colleges could better convey incentives for school effort Prof. James E.

Building better students by building better college

procedures: How community colleges could better convey incentives for school effort

Prof. James E. Rosenbaum, Pam Schuetz, Ph.D. and Amy ForanNorthwestern University

Page 2: Building better students by building better college procedures: How community colleges could better convey incentives for school effort Prof. James E.

12/10/2010 2

Note. From “Community college: The unfinished revolution,” by Rosenbaum, Redline & Stephan, 2007, Issues in Science and Technology, 23, p. 50.

Page 3: Building better students by building better college procedures: How community colleges could better convey incentives for school effort Prof. James E.

The “Zen-question”• If colleges give a “test,” and students don’t

see any reason to do well, have students

really taken a test?

• Consider Emma. Did she take a test?

• A test’s validity depends on more than

merely its test items. Validity is also a

function of the social context of testing.

12/10/2010 3

Page 4: Building better students by building better college procedures: How community colleges could better convey incentives for school effort Prof. James E.

Community Colleges and Placement Tests

• Students placed in lowest remedial levels of reading and math have less than a 33% and 17% chance respectively of completing the remedial sequence (Bailey, Jeong, & Cho, 2010).

• About 75% of students report not preparing for a placement test, yet almost 3/4 of those students would advise others to do so (Rosenbaum, Shuetz, & Foran, 2010).

• 2/3 of community college students do not realize their remedial courses do not count for credit (Rosenbaum, Deil-Amen, & Person, 2006).

12/10/2010 4

Page 5: Building better students by building better college procedures: How community colleges could better convey incentives for school effort Prof. James E.

• What do community colleges tell incoming students about placement tests?

Community Colleges and Placement Tests

12/10/2010 5

Page 6: Building better students by building better college procedures: How community colleges could better convey incentives for school effort Prof. James E.

Methods and Sample

• 9 public community colleges (4 in Illinois and 5 in California)

• Websites are the major source of information

12/10/2010 6

Page 7: Building better students by building better college procedures: How community colleges could better convey incentives for school effort Prof. James E.

Findings

1.The Test: What is the placement test?

– Community college websites do not advertise

placement tests.

– Several colleges barely mention the test.

– Many colleges bury information deep within their

sites.

12/10/2010 7

Page 8: Building better students by building better college procedures: How community colleges could better convey incentives for school effort Prof. James E.

2.Incentives: Why is the test important?

– Community college websites do not inform

students of placement tests’ impact on degree

timetables.

– Colleges often avoid giving discouraging

information and provide vague, reassuring

descriptions of the test instead.

Findings

12/10/2010 8

Page 9: Building better students by building better college procedures: How community colleges could better convey incentives for school effort Prof. James E.

3.Preparation: How can students get a better

score?

– “Summer gap”

– Community colleges do not recommend preparing

for placement tests. Some discourage it.

– Preparation materials are limited.

Findings

12/10/2010 9

Page 10: Building better students by building better college procedures: How community colleges could better convey incentives for school effort Prof. James E.

4.Timing and Retest: When should students

take the test?

– Advice on when to take the test and retesting is

largely unavailable.

– Advantages to testing early:

• Fresh content

• Allows time for practice and retesting

Findings

12/10/2010 10

Page 11: Building better students by building better college procedures: How community colleges could better convey incentives for school effort Prof. James E.

5.Use: How to use test results?

– Provide students with information to devise

successful plans within timetable;

– Indicate student’s level of preparation;

– Forecast additional time needed for remedial;

– Advise students in choosing first career goal.

Findings

12/10/2010 11

Page 12: Building better students by building better college procedures: How community colleges could better convey incentives for school effort Prof. James E.

Conclusion• Community college webpages provide little

information about existence and importance of placement tests.

• Social context undermines the test’s validity as an indicator of students’ college readiness.

• Community colleges’ lack of clarity on placement tests likely hurts remedial results, regardless of students’ achievement.

12/10/2010 12

Page 13: Building better students by building better college procedures: How community colleges could better convey incentives for school effort Prof. James E.

What can community colleges do?

• Standardize and organize the community college admissions process - emulate that of selective colleges’ admissions and testing– Admissions test– “National Decision Day”– Early Registration– College Board and ACT procedures

• Improve advice given on websites - the main source of information about community colleges

12/10/2010 13

Page 14: Building better students by building better college procedures: How community colleges could better convey incentives for school effort Prof. James E.

ReferencesBailey, T., Jeong, D. W., & Cho, S. (2010). Referral, enrollment, and completion in developmental education sequences in community colleges. Economics of Education Review, 29, 255-270.

Rosenbaum, J., Deil-Amen, R., & Person, A. (2006). After admission: From college access to college success. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Rosenbaum, J., Redline, J., & Stephan, J. (2007). Community college: The unfinished revolution. Issues in Science and Technology, 23(4), 49-56.

Rosenbaum, J., Schuetz, P. & Foran, A. How students make college plans and ways schools and colleges could help. (working paper, Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, July 15, 2010).

12/10/2010 14