Top Banner
Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013 cts of Attitude towards Speaking English posure to Oral Communication in English o f Communication Strategies by English Maj in Vietnam
25
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

Bui Thi Thuc Quyen

Channarong Intaraprasert

August 2013

Effects of Attitude towards Speaking English andExposure to Oral Communication in English on

Use of Communication Strategies by English Majors in Vietnam

Page 2: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

Outline

Research Design1

Results and Discussions2

Implications, Contributions, and Suggestions for Future Research3

2

Page 3: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

• Definition of Terms

• Theoretical Framework

• Research Objectives & Questions

• Data Collection and Data Analysis

• Research Subjects’ Distribution

• Sample of Questionnaires3

Research Design

Page 4: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

Communication strategies (CSs):

The attempts made by the students in order to

deal with oral communication breakdowns in

getting the intended message across to the

interlocutor or in understanding the message

sent from the interlocutor

4

Definition of Terms (1/2)

Page 5: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

5

Definition of Terms (2/2)

The students

Attitude towards speaking English

Exposure to oral

Communica-tion in

English

Page 6: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

6

1

Attitude towards

Speaking English

2

Exposure to oral

communica-tion

in English

Learners’ frequency of CS use

Theoretical Framework for the Present Study

Page 7: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

1. To investigate whether frequency of the students’

reported CS use varies significantly by their

attitudes towards speaking English and exposure to

oral communication in English

2. To examine the patterns of a significant variation

in the frequency of the students’ reported of CS use

at different levels with regard to the two variables, if

they exist

7

Research Objectives

Page 8: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

1. Do students’ choices of strategies to deal with

communication breakdowns vary significantly

according to their attitudes towards speaking

English? If they do, what are the main significant

variation patterns?

2. Do students’ choices of strategies to deal with

communication breakdowns vary significantly

according to their exposure to oral communication

in English? If they do, what are the main

significant variation patterns? 8

Research Questions

Page 9: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

9

• • Quantitative

method

• CS Questionnaire

• English Speaking

Attitude

Questionnaire

Data Collection & Data Analysis

Quantitative method

• ANOVA

• Chi-square tests

Page 10: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

Number of students by variables

Attitude towards speaking English

Positive919

Negative66

Exposure to oral communication in English

Limited328

Non-limited667

Perceived Levels of Oral Proficiency

Fairly good or higher

682

Average or lower313

10

Research Subjects’ Distribution

Page 11: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

Communication Strategies

Frequency of Communication Strategy Use

Always or

almost always

Often Sometimes

Never or

almost never

1) Using all purpose words √

11

The Communication Strategy Questionnaire

Page 12: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

StatementsStrongly

agreeAgree Undec

idedDisagr

ee

Strongly

disagree

1) You enjoy speaking English √

12

The English Speaking Attitude Questionnaire

Page 13: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

• Levels of Data Analysis

• Variations in CS Use

• Discussions

13

Results and Discussions

Page 14: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

Overall strategy useStrategy use under the

SGM and SUM categories

Individual strategy use

14

Levels of Data Analysis

Page 15: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

Attitude towards Speaking English

Positive Negative Comments

Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Sig. level Variation pattern

2.57 .30 2.44 .32 p<.01 Positive>Negative

15

Variations in CS Use at Overall Level

Page 16: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

Attitude towards speaking English

Category Positive Negative Comments

Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Sig. level

Variation pattern

SGM 2.53 .31 2.39 .32 p<.001 Positive> Negative

SUM 2.64 .37 2.55 .36 p<.05Positive>

Negative

16

Variations in CS Use at Category Level

Page 17: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

17

Attitude towards speaking English

Reported with high use by

Number of CSs Types of CSs

A greater percentage of students with positive attitude

11 Self-reliant achievement strategies

A greater percentage of students with negative attitude 1

Appealing for assistance from someone else around to clarify the interlocutor’s message

Variations in CS Use at Individual Item Level (1/2)

Page 18: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

18

Exposure to oral communication in English

Reported with high use by

Number of CSs Types of CSs

A greater percentage of students with limited exposure

12L1-based,avoidance, & help-seeking strategies

A greater percentage of students with non-limited exposure

14Self-reliant achievement strategies

Variations in CS Use at Individual Item Level (2/2)

Page 19: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

Reasons

Motivation to speak English

Levels of oral proficiency

Opportunities to speak English

19

Discussion (1/2)

Variations related to the students’ attitudes towards speaking English

Page 20: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

Reasons

Opportunities to deal with communication difficulties

Levels of oral proficiency

Attitudes towards speaking English

20

Discussion (2/2)

Variations related to the students’ exposure to oral communication in English

Page 21: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

• Implications

• Contributions

• Suggestions for Future Research

21

Implications, Contributions, and Suggestions for Future Research

Page 22: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

22

2

The students’

awareness

1

Teachers’ awareness

Implications

Page 23: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

The research instruments

The context &

investigated variables

Research on CSs

23

The knowledge

of CS use

Contributions

Page 24: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

Levels of oral proficiency

Investigated variables

Research population

24

Suggestions for Future Research

Page 25: Bui Thi Thuc Quyen Channarong Intaraprasert August 2013.

www.themegallery.com