Budgeting for Success We have Funding, Now What? College of the Canyons Jerry Buckley ◦ Assistant Superintendent / Vice President, Academic Affairs Daylene Meuschke ◦ Dean, Research, Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Ryan Theule ◦ Vice President, Canyon Country Campus
21
Embed
Budgeting for Success We have Funding, Now What? College of the Canyons Jerry Buckley ◦Assistant Superintendent / Vice President, Academic Affairs Daylene.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Budgeting for SuccessWe have Funding, Now What?
College of the Canyons
Jerry Buckley◦ Assistant Superintendent / Vice President, Academic Affairs
Daylene Meuschke ◦ Dean, Research, Planning and Institutional Effectiveness
Ryan Theule ◦ Vice President, Canyon Country Campus
How many people think our workload is excessive???
What if we could reduce our time invested in planning and reporting our outcomes?
What about enhancing the program review process?
Disaggregation and enhanced program data analysisAchievement data
Learning outcomes
Expanded program review activitiesDetailed activity descriptions that identify specific funding criteria
Filter program review proposals
Extract proposals that meet criteria to align with specific funding categories:
1. General fund2. SSSP3. Equity4. Perkins5. Lottery
Assign filtered proposals to specific subcommittees to evaluate and rank
1. College Planning Committee2. Accreditation3. Basic Skills4. SSSP5. Equity6. Professional Development7. Others (?)
Institutional Effectiveness and Inclusive Excellence (IE)2
A Steering Committee Concept
A SUB-COMMITTEE OF YOUR
COLLEGE PLANNING COMMITTEE
Another committee?SSSP
Equity
Non-Credit (formerly
AB86)S4S
Title V Grant
IEPI There are many funding streams with
overlapping projects, separate meetings and separate plans – all aimed at improving
outcomes for students
Our Theoretical Framework The Learning-and-Effectiveness Paradigm focuses on…
Inclusion
EngagementIntegration
The Learning-and-Effectiveness Paradigm aims to…
Explore how identity-group differences affect relationships among individuals and the way work gets done
Looks for ways to remove barriers that block constituents from using the full range of their competencies
Mission The mission of the Institutional Effectiveness and Inclusive Excellence Steering Committee is to develop and articulate the institutional approach to fostering an equity-minded, learning-centered and inclusive community for all students, faculty and staff. To fulfill its mission the Institutional Effectiveness and Inclusive Excellence Steering Committee will facilitate streamlined processes, improved communication and improved collaboration through its regular, coordination meetings between student government, academic senate, student equity, S4S (basic skills), non-credit, student success and support program, and other groups as applicable (e.g., grant funded projects).
Vision The Institutional Effectiveness and Inclusive Excellence Steering Committee is dedicated to leveraging resources, both fiscal and human, equity and inclusion as catalysts for institutional effectiveness and student success, which are aligned with the College’s institutional mission to be an institution of excellence and its strategic goal for student support to “…provide student support to facilitate equitable student success and maximize opportunity for all students.”
Institutional Effectiveness and Inclusive Excellence GOAL ONE
Establish a framework to direct the Institutional
Effectiveness and Inclusive Excellence plan
GOAL THREEDevelop a common
understanding of the areas where efforts are needed to improve student outcomes
GOAL FIVEInstitute accountability
measures, evaluate progress and celebrate successes
GOAL FOURFoster a culture of inclusive
excellence among staff, faculty and administrators
GOAL TWOIncrease collaboration among constituents on activities designed to
Proposed Organization for (IE)2 Steering Committee
Highlights of proposed changes with new structure:1. Improved communication, collaboration & integrated planning2. Improved coordination of research, evaluation and
development of plans submitted to the CCCCO3. Common inventory of all activities supporting COC’s student
outcome and institutional goals4. Processes would be streamlined through utilization of a
common solution form5. Review progress on indicators relative to goals, establish new
goals, review strategies for achieving goals within Equity, S4S, SSSP and other efforts, as well as discuss unmet needs and ways to meet those needs
6. Meet 3/semester (fall/spring, each) with additional meetings for work groups
7. Assist with review of proposed projects Note: Other groups will be added as needed
Sample Data Presentation and Alignment with Individual Plan and Institutional Goals
One-page summaries will present all pertinent information in a digestible fashion.
New presentation of data will increase campus-wide interest and result in more inclusive discussions on how to improve student outcomes for equity, basic skills, noncredit and other areas.
Indicator Summary
Sample Research and Evaluation Plan and Logic Model
Activity Proposal EvaluationCriteria & Rubric(s)
Alignment with:1. College mission2. Master plan(s)3. Strategic plan goals & objectives4. Department objectives5. Federal, state and college funding criteria
Group Participation
The welding department proposes: 1. An activity to increase the number and
diversity of their student population.2. An activity to improve student retention and
pass rates on industry certification exams for African American males.
Welding Department Activity Proposal #1 – Increase Diversity
1. Increase program marketing at local high schools – create a recruitment video
2. Fund faculty release time for instructors and counselors to meet with high school students
3. Fund school buses to bring students to the college campus for tours of the welding program
Welding Department Activity Proposal #2 – Pass Rates
1. Increase tutoring opportunities for welding students – place peer tutors in the lab
2. Create OER certification exam review materials for welding students
3. Fund testing materials for written and/or practical examinations