Buckminster | Component Assembly Project - Eclipse · | Buckminster Proposal 2 buckminster summary Addresses development problems associated with assembling complex component structures

© 2002 IBM Corporation

Confidential | Date | Other Information, if necessary

1

May 18, 2005

Buckminster | Component Assembly Project

Eclipse Technology Project ProposalProject Creation ReviewMay 23, 2005

| Buckminster Proposal 2

buckminster summary

� Addresses development problems associated with assembling complex component structures in team-based development

� Proposed for incubation as an Eclipse Technology Project Sub-Project

� Sponsoring entity: ObjectWeb consortium

� Project name: after Buckminster Fuller, architect, engineer; inventor of the geodesic dome; pioneer of manufactured modular structures.

| Buckminster Proposal 3

key problem: working with complex component structures

� Development projects increasingly involve component structures:� with complex, version-specific dependencies and relationships

� combining components from open source and proprietary projects

� characterized by a high rate of change

� mixing code artifacts in a range of forms and formats

� resourced with virtual development teams and heterogenous development infrastructure

� Eclipse currently provides an excellent environment for managingcomponent complexity in plug-in development, but:

� PDE management support is available only for plug-ins and other Eclipse component types

� Project-Sets lack support for version dependency scenarios

� Project Sets lack support for flexible location resolution

| Buckminster Proposal 4

key objectives

� Buckminster’s primary objective is to leverage & extend Eclipse to:� bring complex component development on par with current

mechanisms for plug-in & feature development

� extend the component dependency model to allow materialization based on match rules

� Buckminster will accomplish this by:

� introducing a project/component-agnostic way of describing arbitrarily complex component structures and dependencies in development projects

� allowing component materialization based on match rules, i.e.similar to platform mechanism for runtime resolution of plug-ins/features

� providing a materialization mechanism that handles all componenttypes referenced through repository handlers

| Buckminster Proposal 5

scope & implementation

� Buckminster’s key features will include:

� Complex dependency resolution

� Uniform component dependency formats

� Intelligent retrieval mechanisms

� Flexible project workspace binding

� Buckminster will be implemented as an Eclipse feature/plug-in set in order to:

� work seamlessly inside the Eclipse environment &

� be packageable as a ’product’ for pure command line access

� Extension points will be supplied for community participation

| Buckminster Proposal 6

drill-down: complex dependency resolution

� Provides recursive resolution of dependencies

� Supports a variety of versioning schemes

� Applicable to source and binary artifacts that are not version-controlled in a traditional sense

� Uses match rules similar to those in the Eclipse plug-in runtime framework, allowing comparison of current and prior dependency resolutions to support update impact analyses

| Buckminster Proposal 7

drill-down: uniform component dependency format

� Component-type agnostic mechanism for describing components and their respective targets and dependency requirements

� Will leverage dependency info associated with typical Eclipse projects and range of other component types

� Extensible to provide additional strategies for dependency pattern recognition

| Buckminster Proposal 8

drill-down: intelligent retrieval mechanisms

� Leverages the Eclipse "Team Project Set" mechanism by separatingbill of material needed for given configuration from its actual materialization

� Separation is of value since:

� dependencies may appoint software that is locally installed on one machine but lacking on another

� bills of materials may be shared between team members, while materialization info may vary

� information about repositories will be abstracted out in order to provide site and repository transparency

| Buckminster Proposal 9

drill-down: flexible workspace binding

� Allows a component materialized on disc to be bound to a workspace in different ways

� Supports "Proxy Projects" consisting of:

� links to physical artifacts +

� auto-generated Eclipse project information

� Approach is of value when sharing code or other artifacts that are not Eclipse projects

| Buckminster Proposal 10

project roadmap

� Preliminary scope of currently planned milestones is as follows:� Milestone 1 (Sep 05)

� Component resolution and materialization using commonly used repositories, both source code control systems and URL based repositories

� Recognition of standard Eclipse PDE-components� Support for basic version resolution strategies� Implemented as wizards (Eclipse UI) and command line (Eclipse UI & Product)� Transparent integration with Eclipse build system

� Milestone 2 (Jan 06)� Recognition of J2EE, Maven and other common component types� Support for advanced version resolution strategies� Graphical editor-set for range of supported configuration specification formats

� Milestone 3 (May 06)� Support for wider range of commercial repository providers and component types

� Final milestones will reflect input from community; project will proactively seek input from other Eclipse projects.

| Buckminster Proposal 11

Team

� Buckminster proposal sponsored by ObjectWeb consortium

� Initial project team includes the following individuals:� Thomas Hallgren

� Kenneth Ölwing

� Pontus Rydin

� Mitch Sonies

� Additional individuals have expressed interest in becoming committers

| Buckminster Proposal 12

project transition

� Assuming success as a Technology sub-project, either of the following scenarios is plausible long term:

� Buckminster is merged into the mainline Eclipse Platform top-level project

� Buckminster is moved to a permanent state as a Tools Platform project

© 2002 IBM Corporation

Confidential | Date | Other Information, if necessary

13

May 18, 2005

Thank You

The Buckminster Team