COLLEGE SERIES OF GREEK AUTHORS EDITED DNDEK THE SUPERVISION OF JOHN WILLIAMS WHITE AND CHARLES BUETON GUUCK INTEODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF THE GEEEK DIALECTS GRAMMAR SELECTED INSCRIPTIONS GLOSSARY BY CARL DARLING §UCK PBOFESSOK OF SANSKRIT AND INDO-EUROPEAN COMPARATIVE PHILOLOGT IN THE UNIVERSITY OP CHICAGO GINN AND COMPANY BOSTON • NEW YORK • CHICAGO • LONDON
345
Embed
Buck 1910. Introduction to the Study of the Greek Dialects
Buck, Carl Darling 1910. Introduction to the Study of the Greek Dialects: Grammar, Selected Inscriptions, Glossary. Boston, etc.: Ginn and Co.The standard introductory text on ancient Greek dialects.PDF file adapted from archive, org, with bookmarks added.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
COLLEGE SERIES OF GREEK AUTHORSEDITED DNDEK THE SUPERVISION OF
JOHN WILLIAMS WHITE AND CHARLES BUETON GUUCK
INTEODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF THE
GEEEK DIALECTS
GRAMMARSELECTED INSCRIPTIONS
GLOSSARY
BY
CARL DARLING §UCKPBOFESSOK OF SANSKRIT AND INDO-EUROPEAN COMPARATIVE PHILOLOGT
IN THE UNIVERSITY OP CHICAGO
GINN AND COMPANYBOSTON • NEW YORK • CHICAGO • LONDON
Entered at Stationebs' Hall
Copyright, 1910, by
John 'Williams White akd Charles Burton Golick
ALL rights reserved
910.1
(He attenanm gteg<GINN AND COMPANY • PRO-PRIETORS • BOSTON' U.S.A.
TO
THE MEMORY OF
THOMAS DAY SEYMOUR
PREFACE
The aim of this work is to fnrnish in concise form the essential
material for an introductory study of the Greek dialects. Hitherto
there has been no single volume intended to fulfill the requirements
of college and graduate students who wish to gain a first-hand
knowledge of Greek dialects, whether for a better understanding of
historical Greek grammar, or for a greater appreciation of the vari-
ety of speech in the Greek world, only half suspected from the few
dialects employed in literature, or as a substantial foundation for a
critical study of these literary dialects, or merely for the ability to
handle intelligently the numerous dialect inscriptions which are
important in the investigation of Greek institutions.
It is now more than ten years since the author formed the plan
of publishing a brief collection of Greek dialect inscriptions with
explanatory notes for the use of students, and made a selection for
this purpose. At that time Cauer's Delectus inscriptionum Graeca^
rum (2d ed. 1883), which proved useful for many years, had already
ceased to be a representative collection of dialect inscriptions. In
the case of several dialects the material there given was quite over-
shadowed in importance by the discoveries of recent years. In the
meantime this situation has been relieved by the publication of
Solmsen's Inscriptiones Graecae ad inlustrandas dialectos selectae.
But another need, which it was equally a part of the plan to supply,
namely of more explanatory matter for the assistance of beginners
in the subject, has remained unfilled up to the present time, though
here again in the meantime a book has been announced as in prep-
aration (Thumb's Handbuch der griechischen Dialekte) which pre-
sumably aims to serve the same purpose as the present one.
With regard to the explanatory matter, the first plan was to ac-
company the inscriptions not only by exegetical, but also by rather
full grammatical notes, with references to the grammars where the
vi PEEFACE
peculiarity in question -was treated as a whole. But tlie desire to
include all that was most essential to the student in this single vol-
ume led to the expansion of the introduction into a concise " Gram-
mar of the Dialects," and the author has come to believe that this
may prove to be the most useful part of the work. Without it the
student would be forced at every turn to consult either the larger
Greek Grammars, where, naturally, the dialectic peculiarities are
not sifted out from the discussion of the usual literary forms, or
else the various grammars of special dialects. For, since Ahrens,
the works devoted to the Greek dialects, aside from discussions of
special topics, have consisted in separate grammars of a single dia-
lect or, at the most, of a single group of dialects. Some of the ad-
vantages which this latter method undoubtedly possesses we have
aimed to preserve by means of the Summaries (pp. 129-153).
Highly important as are the dialects for the comparative study
of the Greek language, this Grammar is distinctly not intended as
a manual of comparative Greek grammar. It restricts itself to the
discussion of matters in which dialectic differences are to be ob-
served, and the comparisons are almost wholly within Greek itself.
Furthermore, the desired brevity could be secured only by elimi-
nating almost wholly any detailed discussion of disputed points and
citation of the views of others, whether in agreement or in oppo-
sition to those adopted in the text. Some notes and references
are added in the Appendix, but even these are kept within narrow
limits. Several of these references are to articles which have ap-
peared since the printing of the Grammar, which began in Septem-
ber 1908, was completed.
Especial pains have been taken to define as precisely as possible
the dialectic distribution of the several peculiarities, and it is be-
lieved that, though briefly stated and without exhaustive lists of
examples, fuller information of this kind has been brought together
than is to be found in any other general work. Biit, as the most com-
petent critics will also be the first to admit, no one can be safe from
the danger of having overlooked some stray occurrence of a given
peculiarity in the vast and still much scattered material; and, further-
more, such statements of distribution are subject to the need of contin-
ual revision in the light of the constantly appearing new material.
PREFACE vii
The reasons for not attempting in the Grammar a fuller account
of the peculiarities exhibited by our literary texts in dialect are set
forth on p. 14.
The Selected Inscriptions show such a noticeable degree of coin-
cidence with the selection made by Solmsen, in the work cited above,
that it is perhaps well to state expressly that this is not the result
of having simply adopted a large part of his selections with some
additions, as it might appear, but of an independent selection, made
some years before the appearance of his work, and, except for some
necessary reduction, adhered to with probably not over half a dozen
substitutions. Eor a brief collection the choice of the most repre-
sentative inscriptions from a time when the dialects are comparar
tively unmixed is fairly clear. The later inscriptions with their
various types of dialect mixture are of great interest, and some
few examples of these have been included. But to represent this
phase adequately is possible only in a much more comprehensive
collection.
The transcription employed is also identical with that used by
Solmsen in his second edition, but this again is the result of long-
settled conviction that this system, as used for example by Baunack
in his Inschriften von Gortyn (1885) and his edition of the Delphian
inscriptions (1891), is the one best adapted for a work of this kind.
The brevity of the notes is justified by the assistance given in
other parts of the book. If, before beginning the inscriptions of a
given dialect, the student familiarizes himself with its main charac-
teristics by the help of the Summaries (180-273), he will not feel
the need of a comment or reference for a form that, from the point
of view of the dialect in question, has nothing abnormal about it.
Furthermore, the Glossary makes it unnecessary to comment on
many individual words. Detailed discussion of the problems of
chronology, constitutional antiquities, etc. which are involved in
many of the inscriptions is not called for in a work the principal
aim of which is linguistic.
It is sometimes advisable for a student to depart from the order
in which the inscriptions are given, and to begin his study of a dia-
lect with one of the later inscriptions, e.g. in Arcadian to read first
no. 18, leaving until later the more difficult nos. 16, 17.
viii PEEFACE
The Glossary and Index, besides serving as an index to the Gram-
mar, is intended to include all words occurring in the Selected In-
scriptions which are not to be found in Liddell and Scott, or exhibit
unusual meanings.
Some time after this book was first planned, I learned that the
editors of the College Series had already arranged for a volume
dealing with the monuments, inscriptional and literary, which rep-
resent the different dialects of Greece, by Professor H. W. Smyth.
But, finding that Professor Smyth, because of other interests, was
quite willing to relinquish the task, the editors invited me to con-
tribute my contemplated work to the Series. The late Professor
Seymour, under whom more than twenty years ago I had read myfirst dialect inscriptions, gave me valuable counsel on the general
plan, and before his lamented death read over a large part of mymanuscript. I am also under obligation to Professor Gulick for the
great care with which he has read the proofs and for important sug-
gestions. The proofreading in the office of the publishers has been
so notably accurate and scholarly that I cannot omit to express myappreciation of it. m r. r,
C. D. B.
Chicago, Novembek 1909
CONTENTS
PAET I: GRAMMAR OF THE DIALECTS
INTRODUCTION Page
Classification and Interrelation of the Dialects . . 1
The Dialects in Literature . . . . 12
PHONOLOGYAlphabet ... .15Vowels . . . 17
aO FOR O BEFORE AND AFTER LiQDIDS ... 17
FOR a IN Other Cases .18e FOR a . . . ... . . 19
ai; FROM d IS Attic-Ion K' . . . 19
c
1 FROM e BEFORE A VoWEL . 19
1 FROM e BEFORE V IN AuCAnO-CYPRIAN ... 20
1 BESIDE e IN Other Cases . . ... 21
a FROM e before p ix NoRTinvEST Greek: ... 21
West Greek a = East Greek e . . .... 22
1* o from ij IN Elean . . . ... 23
£1 FROM 17 IN ThESSALIAN AND BOEOTIAN . . .23Lesbian ai = -q ... .... 23
£ FROM 1 AFTER p IN AeOLIC 23
Consonantal i from Antevocalic t in Lesbian and Thes-
SALIAX . . . ... 2-t
Interchange of i and v . . . .24i ..... . 24
o
V FROM 0, ESPECIALLY IN ArCADO-CyPRIAN . . . 25
ov FROM u) IN Thessalian . . . . 25
V AND V . . . . . 25
ou IN Boeotian etc. . . 25
Secondary e AND 0. "Spurious Diphthongs" . . . .26
CONTENTS
Diphthongs
ij FROM at IN Boeotian
ei FROM oi in Thessalian
e FROM ei . . .
t FROM ei IN Boeotian .
V FROM 01 IN Boeotian . . . .
ai, ei, ot BEFORE Vowelsav, CD, ou
In General .... . .
ao, CO, FROM au, ev IN East Ionic .
Monophthongization of o«
CM, (V BEFORE VoWELSIn Lesbian ...Insertion op f. Loss of u
Long Diphthongs
In General . .
a, 7;, w, from dtjtjt, qjl .
fit FROM 7;t .........Non-Diphthongal Vowel Combination (Contraction etc.)
In Generala OR o + Vowele + Vowel .
Tl + Vowelo + Vowel .
Notes to Preceding
Assimilation op VowelsEpenthetic VowelsAnaptyctic VowelsVowel-Gradation .
ConsonantsF
In GeneraljS FOR f . .
Initial f before a VowelIntervocalic fPostconsonantal
,
f before Consonants
Consonantal i .
Spiritus Asper. Psilosis
«r. Loss of Intertocalic c
RlIOTACISM
Change of t to o-
Page
28
28
28
29.
29
29
30
30
30
31
81
31
32
33
33
34
36
38
88
89
40
41
41
41
43
44
44
45
46
47
48
49
61
62
63
CONTENTS XI
Page
P, 8,7 ... . 54
<!>>', X .... 55Lacoxian <r FROM 6 55
Interchange op Surds, Sonants, axo Aspirates . 56Interchange of it and itt . . 67
Interchange op Labials, Dentals, and Gutturals ... 58
Nasals and Liquids
Nasal before Consonant . . ... .59Transposition of a Liquid, ou Loss by Dissimilation . 60
Cretan u fkom X .60trr, ve, from Xt, xe . ... . .60
Double Liquids and Nasals in Lesbian and Thessalian
Lac. = LaconianLat. = LatinLesb. = LesbianLocr. = LoorianMant. = MantineanMeg. = MegarianMel. = of MelosMess. = MessenianMil. = of MiletusMycen. = of MyceneNisyr. = of NisynisN.W.Grk. = Northwest GreekOlynth. = of OlynthusDrop. = of OropusPamph. = PamphylianPhoc. = PhocianEheg. = of RhegiumKhod. = RhodianSelin. = of SelinusSicil. = Sicilian
Sicyon. = SicyonianSkt. = SanskritStir. = of Stiris
Styr.= of Styra -
Sybar. = of SybarisSyrac. = SyracusanTeg. = TegeanThas. = of ThasosTher. = TheranThess. = ThessalianTroez. = of Troezen
In abbreviating the names of Greek authors and of their works, Liddell and Scott's
list has been generally followed. Note also the more general gram. = grammatical(forms quoted from the ancient grammarians) , and lit. = literary (forms quoted fromthe literary dialects without mention of the individual authors)
.
For abbreviations of modern works of reference, see under the Bibliography,
pp. 281 fe.
Other abbreviations which are occasionally employed will be readily understood,as cpd. = compound, dat. = dative, Imv. = imperative, 1. = line, pi. = plural, sg. =singular, subj. = subjunctive.
PAST I: GRAMMAR OF THE DIALECTS
INTRODUCTION
Classification and Inteeeelation of the Dialects ^
1. When the ancient grammarians spoke of the four dialects of
Greece— Attic, Ionic, Aeolic, and Doric, to which some added the
Koiv^ as a fifth— they had in mind solely the Literary dialects, wliich
furnished the occasion and object of their study. But these hterary
dialects represent only a few of the many forms of speech current
in Greece, most of which play no part whatever in literature, and,
apart from some scattered glosses, would be entirely miknown to
us were it not for the wealth of inscriptions which the soil of
Greece has yielded in modern times.
The existence of Ionic, Aeolic, and Doric elements in the people
and speech of Greece is an undoubted fact of Greek history, and
one of first importance to an understanding of the dialect rela-
tions. But there is no warrant, either ia the earUer Greek tradition
or in the linguistic evidence, for making this an aU-inclusive classi-
fication. These three elements were precipitated, as it were, on the
coast of Asia ilinor, where their juxtaposition gave rise to the his-
torical recognition of the distinction. And as the lonians, Aeolians,
and Dorians of Asia Minor were colonists from Greece proper, it
was a natural and proper inference of the historians that they re-
flected ethnic divisions which also existed, or had once existed, in
1 See also the Summaries of Characteristics, 180-273, and Charta I and la
at the end of the book.
1
2 GEEEK DIALECTS [l
the mother country.^ As to who were the Dorians of Greece proper
there was of course no mystery. They formed a well-defined group
throughout the historical period, and the tradition that they came
originally from the Northwest is completely home out by the close
relationship of the Doric and Northwest Greek dialects (see below).
That the lonians were akin to the inhabitants of Attica was an
accepted fact in Greek history, and the Athenians are called Ionic
both in Herodotus (e.g. 1.56) and Thucydides (6.82, 7.57). The
linguistic evidence is equally unmistakable. The only uncertainty
here is as to the extent of territory which was once Ionic. There
are various accounts according to which lonians once occupied the
southern shore of the Corinthian gulf, the later Achaea (e.g. Hdt.
2.26.2), and Cynuria (Hdt. 8.73). If these accounts in themselves
are of questionable value, yet we cannot doubt that the lonians
before the migration were not confined to Attica. The close rela-
tions of Epidaurus and Troezen with Athens, in cult and legend, are
significant for the Argolic Acte, and it is reasonable to assume that
at least the entire shore of the Saronic gulf was once lonic.^
The affinities of the Aeolians were more obscure, for theirs was
the earliest migration to Asia Minor, the most remote from the
historical period. But Thessaly was the scene of their favorite
legends, the home of Achilles, as also of their eponymous hero
Aeolus, and many of their place-names had their counterpart in
Thessaly. In Herodotus we find the tradition that the Thessalians
of the historical period were invaders from the west who occupied
1 It is equally natural, and quite iustiflable as a matter of convenience, to
apply the same names to these earlier divisions. That the name Ionian, for ex-
ample, did not gain its current application on the mainland, but in the east, is
of no consequence. Such generic terms are everywhere of gradual growth.2 That is, in a period contemporaneous with the Aeolic and Achaean occupa-
tion of other parts of Greece (see below). Of a still remoter period the view hasbeen advanced that the lonians formed the first wave of Greek migration, werein fact the much-discussed Pelasgians, and for a time occupied also the territory
which with the next wave of migration became Aeolic or Achaean. This is,
naturally, much more problematical.
1] INTEODUCTION 3
what had hitherto been an AeoUc land,i and with this the hnguistic
evidence is in perfect accord. For Thessalian is of all dialects the
most closely related to Lesbian, and at the same time shai-es in someof the characteristics of the West Greek dialects, this admixture
of West Greek elements being somewhat stronger in Thessaliotis
than in Pelasgiotis. See 201, 202, 210, and Chart I. The Boeo-
tians also are called Aeolians by Thucydides,'' and the Boeotian
dialect is, next to Thessalian, the most closely related to Lesbian.
These thr-ee have several notable characteristics in common (see
201 and Chart I), and are known as the Aeohc dialects. But in
Boeotian there is an even stronger admixture of West Greek ele-
ments than in Thessalian (see 217 and Chart I), the historical
explanation of which must be the same. If we credit the state-
ment of Thucydides that the Boeotian invaders were from Arne,
whence they had been driven by the Thessalians,^ we should recog-
nize in these Boeotians, not a part of the old AeoKc population of
Thessaly, but a tribe of West Greek invaders from Epirus (cf. Mt.
Boeon), like the Thessalians who forced them onward. The Aeolic
element is to be ascribed rather to the tribes, or some of them,
comprising the early stratum, as for example the Minyans of
Orchomenos. However obscure such details may be, the evidence
is perfectly clear that both Boeotia and Thessaly were once Aeolic,
but were overrun by West Greek tribes which adopted the speech
of the earlier inhabitants in greater or less degree.
It is a natural presumption, of which there ai-e some specific
indications, that not only Thessaly and Boeotia but the interme-
diate lands of Phocis and Locris, and even southern Aetolia—in fact
has often been taken as representative of ancient tradition andstill colors, in the literal sense, our maps of ancient Greece. Thehistorical Phocians, Locrians, Aetohans, etc., were not, as Strabo's
statement implies, called Aeolic. Neither in Herodotus, Thucydi-
des, nor any early writer, are they ever brought under any one of
the three groups. Their dialects, with that of Elis, which Strabo
also calls Aeolic, all of which may be conveniently designated the
Northwest Greek dialects, are, in spite of some few traces of AeoHcas mentioned above, most closely related to the Doric dialects.
There is scarcely one of the general characteristics common to the
Doric dialects in which they do not share, though they also have
certain peculiarities of their own. See 223 with a, 226, and Chart I.
If we were to classify them under any one of the three groups, it
is unquestionably Doric to which they have the best claim, and if
Strabo and our maps so classed them there would be no very seri-
ous objection. Indeed modem scholars do often class them under
" Doiic in the wider sense," calling them then specifically " North
Doric." But on the whole it seems preferable to retain the term
Doric in its historical application and employ West Greek as the
comprehensive term to include the Northwest Greek dialects and
the Doric proper.
In fact the most fimdamental division of the Greek dialects is
that into these West Greek and the East Greek dialects, the terms
referring to their location prior to the great migrations. The East
Greek Eire the " Old Hellenic " dialects, that is those employed by
the peoples who held the stage almost exclusively in the period
represented by the Homeric poems, when the West Greek peoples
remained in obscurity in the northwest. To the East Greek division
belong the Ionic and Aeolic groups, though, of the latter, Thessalian
and Boeotian, as explained above, are mixed dialects belonging in
ww4pri Tots re 'ApKdirt Koi rots 'HXeiots, . . . , ofroi otoXurri fitcX^ffqcrar, oi 5" SXXot /aurrj
Tin ixP't'^'"^" ^ afi0o», oi /i^ fiaWof oi S* ^TTor alo\t{>)rT€S.
6 GEEEK DIALECTS [l
part also in the West Greek division. And to East Greek belongs
also another group, the Arcado-Cyprian.
No two dialects, not even Attic and Ionic, belong together more
obviously than do those of Arcadia and the distant Cyprus. They
share in a number of notable peculiarities which are unknown else-
where. See 189 and Chart I. This is to be accounted for by the
fact that Cyprus was colonized, not necessarily or probably from
Arcadia itself, as tradition states, but from the Peloponnesian coast,
at a time when its speech was like that which in Arcadia survived
the Doric migration. This group represents, beyond question, the
pre-Doric speech of most of the Peloponnesus, whatever we choose
to call it. The term Achaean is used in so many different senses ^
that it might be well to avoid it entirely. But it is convenient to
apply it to this group, which actually has the best claim to it,
whenever the need is felt of some other term than Arcado-Cyprian,
which, whUe describing accurately what is left of the group in
the historical period, is strikingly infelicitous when applied to
prehistoric times. The relations of this group to the others of the
East Greek division, especially Aeolic, are the most difficult to
interpret historically. Strabo, of course, calls the Arcadians Aeolic,
but without warrant in earlier usage. For example, Thucydides,
in describing the forces engaged at Syracuse (7.57), makes the
most of the distinction between Ionic, Doric, and Aeolic nations,
but does not class the Arcadians with any one of these. Yet the
Arcadian and Cyprian dialects show notable resemblances to the
Aeolic dialects which cannot be afecidental (see 190.3-6 and Chart I),
and some would class them all together under the head of " Aeolic
in the widest sense" or "Achaean" (Aeolic in the usual sense
then appearing as " North Achaean "). On the other hand, manyof the characteristics common to the Aeolic dialects are lacking,
1 '' Achaean '
' is applied by some to a supposed stratum intermediate betweenthat which survived in Arcado-Cyprian and the later Doric. But there is nogood evidence, either linguistic or otherwise, that any such intermediate stratumever existed.
1] INTEODUCTION 7
and there are certain points of agreement with Attic-Ionic (see
190.1, 193.2,3, and Chart I). One may surmise that the latter,
which are in part confined to Arcadian, are due to contact with
lonians on the coast of the Peloponnesus (see above, p. 2), and
that the connections with Aeolic are earlier and more fundamental,
reflecting a period of geographical continuity with Aeohc peoples
somewhere in Northern Greece. But that brings us before the "mys-
tery of the Achaean- name," that most difficult problem of the
relation between the Achaeans of the Phthiotis and the pre-Doric
Achaeans of the Peloponnesus, and of those again to the historical
Achaeans on the Corinthian Gidf, whose dialect is West Greek.
Conservative procedure here consists in recognizing Arcado-Cyprian,
or Achaean, as a distinct group intermediate between Aeolic and
Attic-Ionic, and conceding that the precise historical background of
their interrelations is hopelessly obscure. Arcadian shows some few
West Greek peculiarities which we may properly attribute to the
influence of the surrounding Doric dialects in the historical period.
Just as in the Northwest Greek dialects some traces of the
former Aeolic speech have survived, as noted above, so it is not
surprising to find some traces of Achaean speech in the Doric
dialects spoken in lands formerly Achaean. For example, in
Laconia Poseidon was worshiped under the name of IlohoiSdv,
which recalls Arc. HoaoiSdv, the true Doric form being Hotoi-
Sdv (49.1, 61.5). Here possibly belongs Iv = iv in some Cretan in-
scriptions (10). Besides survivals which bear specifically either the
Aeolic or the Achaean stamp, there are others of forms which are
common to both, and so from the linguistic poiat of view might
be called Aeolic-Achaean, only their provenance leading us to
infer either Aeolic or Achaean source (e.g. probably Achaean,
Te\etr<f>opevT€<; 157, TreSa 137.5, ypo<f)ev<} etc. 5, 6) ; or again others
which might be called simply East Greek without further differ-
entiation. But, apart from some few striking examples, the ques-
tion of survival versus accidental agreement or historical borrowing
is a very delicate one.
8 GEEEK DIALECTS [l
The classification of the dialects is then, in outliae, as follows :
^
West Greek Division East Greek Division
1. Northwest Greek: Phocian, 1. Attic-Ionic.
Locrian, Elean, etc. 2. Aeolic : Lesbian, Thessalian,
2. Doric : Laconian, Corinthian, Boeotian.
Argolic, Cretan, etc. 3. Arcado-Cyprian or Achaean.
2. The Greek dialects, classified in accordance with the preceding
scheme, and with their important subdivisions noted, are the fol-
lowing. For summaries of the characteristics of each, see 180-273.
EAST GREEK
I. The Attic-Ionic Group1. Attic.
2. Ionic.
A. East Ionic, or Ionic of Asia Minor. The Ionic cities of the
coast of Asia Minor and the adjacent islands, Samos, Chios, etc.,
together with their colonies, mostly on the Hellespont, Propontis,
and Euxine. There are some local varieties, of which the most
marked is Chian, containing some Lesbian features.
B. Central Ionic, or Ionic of the Cyclades. The Ionic Cyclades,
Naxos, Amorgos, Paros with its colony Thasos, Delos, Tenos, An-
dres, Ceos, etc.
C. "West Ionic, or Euboean. Chalcis (with its colonies in Italy,
Sicily, and the Chalcidian peninsula) and the other cities of Eu-
boea. A local dialect with marked characteristics is the Eretrian,
seen ia the inscriptions of Eretria and Oropus.
1 Pamphylian, of which the meager remains permit only a very imperfect
knowledge, and which is therefore, barring occasional references, ignored in this
book, shows notable affinities on the one hand with Arcado-Cyprian (u = o, i^
with dat., etc.), on the other with West Greek (<l>lKa.Ti, lap6s, Sko, etc.). AsThessalian and Boeotian represent a mixture of Aeolic and West Greek, so
Pamphylian of Achaean and West Greek. Quite probably the earliest colonists
were Achaeans from the Peloponnesus, later followed by Dorians.
2] INTRODUCTIOZSr 9
II. The Akcado-Cypeian oe Achaean Geoup
1. Arcadian. The most important material 'is from Tegea andMantiaea.
2. Cyprian. There are numerous short inscriptions, and one of
considerable length, the bronze of IdaJium. All are iu the Cyprian
syllabary.
III. The Aeolic Geoup
1. Lesbian, or Asiatic Aeohc.^ The inscriptional material is fairly
extensive, but late. There is nothiug approaching the time of the
poems of Alcaeus and Sappho, and very little that is older than the
Macedonian period. Most of the inscriptions are from the chief
cities of Lesbos, but a few are from other islands and to-wns of
the Aeolic mainland.
2. Thessalian.^ Two subdivisions with marked differences are
formed by the dialect of Pelasgiotis and that of Thessaliotis, which
may be conveniently, if not quite appropriately, designated as East
and West Thessalian.
From Phthiotis there is an early Thessalian inscription, but most
of the material is from the period of Aetohan domination and in
the Northwest Greek Koivri. See 279. From Histiaeotis, Perrhaebia,
and Magnesia the material is very scanty.
3. Boeotian.^ The material is very extensive, and representative
of all the important Boeotian towns, but is meager for the early
period.
WEST GREEKIV. The Noethwest Gkeek Group
1. Phocian. A large part of the material,including nearly all that is
of an early date, is from Delphi, and is quoted specifically as Delphian.
1 Sometimes called simply Aeolic. But, to avoid confusion with Aeolic in its
wider sense, the designation Lesbian is to be preferred in spite of the formal
impropriety of applying it to a dialect not restricted to Lesbos. Most of the
material is actually from Lesbos.
2 That Thessalian and Boeotian are only in part Aeolic, in part West Greek,
has been explained above, pp. 2, 3.
10 GEEEK DIALECTS [2
2. Locrian. The early and important inscriptions are from west-
ern Locris. From eastern Locris the material is meager and late.
3. Elean. All the material, much of which is very early, is from
Olympia.
4. The Northwest Greek Koivri. Employed in Aetolia and other
regions rmder the domination of the Aetolian league. See 279.
Note. Only Phocian, Locrian, and Elean are known to us as distinct
dialects of this group. Of others which presumably belong here we have
practically no material from a time when they retained their individuality.
In Aetolia, for example, before the rise of the Northwest Greek Koivq there
was undoubtedly a distinct Northwest Greek dialect, probably most nearly
related to Locrian, but of this pure Aetolianwe have no knowledge. Of the
speech of Aeniania and Malis previous to the Aetolian domination we have
no remains. It is natural to suppose that Northwest Greek dialects were
once spoken also in Acarnania and Epirus. But here the influence of the
Corinthian colonies was strong from an early period, as shown by the use
of the Corinthian alphabet in the few early inscriptions ; and in later times,
from which nearly all the material dates, the language employed is not the
Northwest Greek Kowq, but the Doric koivtq, like that of the contempora-
neous insci-iptions of Corcyra. -See 279. Hence the actual material from
Acarnania and Epirus is more properly classified with Corinthian. FromCephallenia and Ithaca we have decrees in the Northwest Greek kolvti from
the Aetolian period (see 279), but from earlier times not enough to show
whether the dialect was Northwest Greek or Doric. From Zacynthus there
is almost nothing. The dialect of Achaea (i. e. Peloponnesian Achaea in
the historical period) is generally believed to belong to this group. This
is probable on general grounds, but there is as yet no adequate linguistic
evidence of it. For, apart from the inscriptions of Achaean colonies in
Magna Graecia, which, both on account of their meagemess and the mixedelements in the colonization, are indecisive, nearly all the material is from
the time of the Achaean league, and this is not in the Northwest Greek
Koarfj, but in the same Doric Kotvij that was used in Corinth and Sicyon.
V. The Doric Group
1. Laconian and Heracleata. Laconia and its colonies Tarentum andHeraclea. Heraclean, well known from the Heraclean Tables, has
peculiarities of its own, and is treated as a distinct dialect.
2] ESTTRODUCTION 11
2. Messenian. There is scarcely any material until a late period,
when the dialect is no longer pure.
3. Megarian. Megara, and its colonies in Sicily (especially Selinus)
and on the Propontis and Bosporus (as Byzantium, Chalcedon, etc.).
Except from Selinus the material is late.
4. CorintMan. Corinth, Sicyon, Cleonae, Phlius, and the Corin-
thian colonies Corcyra (with its own colonies ApoEonia and Dyrrha-
chium), Leucas, Anactorium, Ambracia, etc., and, in Sicily, Syracuse
with its own colonies. Material from places other than Corinth,
though coming under the general head of Corinthian, is generally
quoted specifically as Sicyonian, Corcyraean, Syracusan, etc.
5. Argolic. Argos, Mycenae, etc., and the cities of the Acte, as
Hermione, Troezen, and Epidaurus together with Aegina.^ Argolic
(abbreviated Argol.) is used as the general term, while Argive (Arg.)
refers more specifically to the material from Argos (with the Argive
Heraeum), as Epidaurian to that from Epidaurus.
6. Rhodian. Ehodes (Camirus, lalysus, Lindus, and the city of
Eliodes) with the adjacent small islands (Chalce, etc.) and Carpathus,
Telos, and Syme, the settlements on the mainland (the Ehodian
Peraea) and Phaselis in Pamphylia, and the Sicilian colonies Gela
and Agrigentum (an inscription of Ehegium, though not a Ehodian
colony, is in the same dialect). The material is very extensive, but
little of it is early.
7. Coan and Calymnian. The material is considerable,but not early.
8. The dialects of Cnidus, and of Nisyrus, Anaphe, Astypalaea,
and other small islands. The material is late, and insufficient to
determine whether any of these should properly be grouped with
Ehodian, Coan, or Theran. Nisyrus, for example, was nearly always
connected politically with either Cos or Ehodes.
9. Theran and Melian. Thera with Cyrene, and Melos. Early in-
scriptions are numerous, but brief.
1 From Aegina there is not much material from the period before the Athe-
nian occupation, but enough to show that the dialect was Argolic (note tapios
with lenis, 58 &).
12 GEEEK DIALECTS [3
10. Cretan. This is now the best-known of all the Doric dialects,
owing to the very extensive early material, especially from Gortyna.
The dialect of Gortyna and other cities of the great central portion
of the island is also known more specifically as Central Cretan, to
exclude the divergent type seen in the iascriptions, mostly late,
from the eastern and western extremities of the island. See 273.
But the term Cretan alone is to be understood as referring to this
Central Cretan, unless otherwise stated.
The Dialects in Liteeatuee
3. Of the numerous dialects of Greece a few attained the rank
of literary dialects, though for the most part in a mixed and arti-
ficial form not corresponding to anything actually spoken at a
given time and place. Moreover, in the course of literary develop-
ment these dialects came to be characteristic of certain classes of
hterature, and, their r61e once established, the choice of one or the
other usually depended upon this factor rather than upon the native
dialect of the author.
The literary development of epic songs began with the Aeolians
of Asia Minor, whence it passed into the hands of the neighboring
lonians, and the language of Homer, which became the norm of
aU epic poetry and strongly affected subsequent poetry of all classes,
is a mixture of Aeolic and Ionic,— in the main Old Ionic but with
the retention of many Aeolic forms, such as dfifie<; beside ^fiel's,
genitive singular in -do beside -eco, etc. The language of Hesiod is
substantially the same, but with some Aeolic forms not used in
Homer, also some Boeotian and Doric peculiarities. The elegiac
and iambic poets also use the epic dialect with some modifications,
not only lonians like Archilochus, but the Athenian Solon, the
Spartan Tyrtaeus, the Megarian Theognis, etc.
Of the melic poets, Alcaeus and Sappho followed very closely
their native Lesbian dialect, though not entirely unaffected by epic
influence. The language of these and other Lesbian poets was
3] INTEODUCTION 13
directly imitated by some later writers, notably by Theocritus in
three of his idyls, and contributed an important element to the
language of many more, e.g. Anacreon of Teos, who in the main
employed his native Ionic (New Ionic), and, in general, to the
choral lyric, which Xv^as mainly Doric.
The choral lyric was developed among Doric peoples, though
under the impulse of Lesbian poets, who we know were welcomed
in Sparta, for example, in the seventh century. Its language is
Doric, vnth an admixture of Lesbian and epic forms, no matter
whether the poet is a Dorian, or a Boeotian like Pindar, or an
Ionian like Simonides and Bacchyhdes. This Doric, however, is not
identical with any specific Doric dialect, but is an artificial com-
posite, showing many of the general Doric characteristics, but with
the elimination of local peculiarities. An exception is to be made
in the case of Alcman, whose Doric is of a severer type and evi-
dently based upon the Laconian, though also mixed with Lesbian
and epic forms.
The earliest prose writers were the Ionic philosophers and Ms-
torians of the sixth century, and in the fifth century not only
Herodotus, but Hippocrates of Cos, a Dorian, wrote in Ionic. In
the meantime, with the political and intellectual supremacy of
Athens, Attic had become the recognized language of the drama,
and before the end of the fifth century was employed in prose also,
though the earlier prose writers as Thucydides, like the tragedians,
• avoided certain Attic peculiarities which were stUl felt as provin-
cialisms (e.g. TT = crcr, pp = per). Henceforth Attic was the lan-
guage of literary prose.
The dialects mentioned are the only literary dialects known and
cultivated throughout the Greek world. But some few others were
employed locally. Epicharmus and Sophron wrote in their native
Syracusan Doric, as did, later, Archimedes. A form of Doric prose
was developed among the Pythagoreans of Magna Graecia, seen in
some fragments of Archytas of Tarentum, Philolaus of Croton, and
others, though the greater part of the writings of this class are
14 GEEEK DIALECTS [3
spurious. The comic poet Ehiuthon, from whom the grammarians
sometimes quote, used the Doric of Tarentum. The fragments of
Corinna of Tanagra, whose fame was scarcely more than local, are
in Boeotian, and the Boeotian dialect, as well as Megarian and
Laconian, are caricatured by Aristophanes. But the great majority
of the dialects play no role whatever in literature.
Even for those dialects which are represented, the literary re-
maias must for the most part be regarded as secondary sources,
not only because of their artificial character but also because of
the corruptions which they have suffered in transmission. Excep-
tional importance, however, attaches . to the language of Homer
because of its antiquity, and to the Lesbian of Alcaeus and Sappho
because it is relatively pure and much older than the inscriptional
material.
Note. In the following exposition, dialectic forms from literary and
grammatical sources are not infrequently quoted, especially where the
inscriptional evidence is slight, as it is, for example,' quite naturally, for
the personal pronouns. Such forms are sometimes quoted with their spe-
cific sources, sometimes simply as literary Doric (lit. Dor.), literary Lesbian
(lit. Lesb.), literary Ionic (lit. Ion.), or grammatical (gram.). But a de-
tailed treatment of the dialectic peculiarities observed in our literary texts
is so bound up with questions of literary tradition and textual criticism
that it is best left to the critical editions of the various authors. It would
be impracticable in a work of the present scope, and would, moreover, tend
to obscure that more trustworthy picture of the dialects which is gained
from inscriptions, and which is so important as a basis for the critical study
of the mixed literary forms.
PHONOLOGY
The Alphabet
4. The numerous diEFerences in the local alphabets, so far as
they consist merely in variations of the forms of the letters, need
not be discussed here, important as the}- are to the epigraphist in
deciding the age and source of inscriptions. But certain points in
the use of the alphabet and its development as a means of express-
ing the Greek sounds should be noted.
1. In the most primitive type of the Greek alphabet, as it is
seen in the earliest inscriptions of Crete, Thera, and Melos, the
non-Phoenician signs <|), X, Y have not yet been introduced, and the
I is not in use. The sounds of <fi, y^ are represented by ttA, k/i
(or fh), or, as in Crete, where B (H) when used is tj not A, are not
distinguished fi-om tt, k ; those of yjr, f, by ttct, Ktr.
2. In the next stage of development, after the introduction of
<l>, X, Y, the alphabets fall into two classes, according to the values
attached to these signs. The eastern division, to which Ionic
belongs, employs them as <|), %, '^, and also uses the i as ^, though
a subdivision of this group, represented mainly by the Attic aljdia-
bet, uses only the first two and expresses fjr, f by <f>(r, x'^- The
western di^ision,^ to which belong the majority of the alphabets
of Greece proper as weU as that of Euboea, whence it was carried
to Italy by the Chalcidian colonies and became the source of the
Latin alphabet, employs <l>, X, Y as ^, f, x. not using I at all, and
1 This distinction of eastern and western alphabets, the distribution of wliich
is clearly shown in the Chart in Kirchhoff s Sludien zur GeschictUe des griechi-
schen Alphabets, has no connection with that of East and West Greek dialects,
and is anything but coincident with it.
15
16 GREEK DIALECTS [4
generally expressing yjr by ttct or, oftener, ^a (only in Locrian and
Arcadian by a special sign *).
3. In the earliest inscriptions nearly all the alphabets have the
f (van or digamma); and many the 9 (koppa), which is used before
or V, and that too even if a liquid intervenes, e.g. ioptvdodev,
h6ppo<!, Aop/30?, ippore, IlaT/aopXo?, XepvOof, 2\vtos (in other posi-
tions it is very rare).
4. Two signs were available for o-, namely ^ or 5 (sigma) and
M (san), and most alphabets use one of these to the exclusion of
the other. But there are some few examples of a differentiation.
In an early Arcadian inscription of Mantinea (no. 16), the charac-
ter \A, a simplified form of the san, which is known from other
sources, is used to denote a sibilant of specifically Arcado-Cyprian
origin, as in v^t? (transcribed a;i<;) = Cypr. o-ts, Att. tk. See 68.3.
A sign T, which is also probably a modification of the san, is used
in some Ionic inscriptions of Asia Minor for the usual acr = Att. tt,
e.g. from Hahcarnassus 'KXiicapvwve{(o)v beside 'AXiKupvacrcrecov,
from Ephesus TeTape;, reTapaKovra = reaaapei;, etc., from Teos
\ff\d\wvr]'i beside OaKaacrav.
5. In Boeotian, V, a compromise between E and I, is sometimes
used for the close e, later i (9.2). At Corinth and Megara there
were two characters, & and E, for the e-sounds, but usually dififer-
entiated. See 28.
6. In most of the alphabets the H (early B) is the sign of the
spiritus asper, and neither 77 and co nor the lengthened e and ("spu-
rious et and ow") are distinguished from the short e and 0. But
in East Ionic, where the sound of the spiritus asper was lost at a
very early period, the H, which was thus left free, was turned to
account as a vowel sign, not so much to show a difiference in quan-
tity (in the case of a, I, v no such need was felt) as one of quality.
It was probably used first only for the extremely open e coming
from d, that is for the specifically Attic-Ionic -q (8), which for a
time was more open than the sound of the inherited e, though this
was also open as compared with the short e, and both soon became
S] PHOXOLOGY 17
identical and were denoted in the same way. To be sure, no suchdistinction is to be observed in East Ionic inscriptions, but it is
seen in some of the Cyclades, to which the use of the H had passedfrom East Ionic, e.g. from Naxos (no. 6) NiKcivSpr), popr], etc., butavedeKev (with E in the penult). Siinilai- examples from Ceos (e.g.
no. 8) and Amorgos.
The use of H = ?/ extended not only to the Ionic but also to the
Doric islands, Rhodes, Thera, Melos, and Crete, where it is found
in the earliest inscriptions, though in Crete it went out of use for
a time, not appearing for example in the Law-Code. In Central
Ionic, where the sound of the spiritus asper still survived, as also
in Ehodes, Thera, and Melos, the sign was used both as t) and as
k It occurs also with the value of he, at Delos, Naxos (no. 6),
and Oropus (no. 14.46).
The Ionic alphabet is also characterized by its distinction of o
and o) through dififerentiated forms of (usually Q = (o, but in
some of the islands, namely Paros, Thasos, and Siphnos, Q = o, and
or G = w).
7. In 403 RC. the Ionic alphabet was officially introduced at
Athens, and not much later replaced the native or "epichoric"
alphabets in other parts of Greece. Inscriptions of the end of the
fifth or the beginning of the fourth century often show a transi-
tional form of the alphabet, partly epichoric, partly Ionic. Even
with the full Ionic alphabet, f was generally retained where it was
still sounded, and sometimes a form of H was used for the spiritus
asper, as h in the Heraclean Tables and occasionally elsewhere
(Elis, no. 60, Sicyon, Epidaurus). The Delphian Labyadae inscrip-
tion (no. 51) has B = h, H = ?/.
For the Cyprian syllabary, see no. 19.
VOWELSa
5. o for a before or after liquids. Examples are most numerous
in Lesbian, mainly from literary and grammatical sources, as
18 GREEK DIALECTS [5
(7t/jo'tos = arpaTO^, hpoaea)<i = Bpaaewi, ^oKaicri = y^dXcoai, etc.
So an^p[6]Trjv (no. 21) = dfiaprelv, like Horn, rjn^porov = •^fj.ap-
Tov (fjL^p from iu,p, as regularly). Both arporayoi; and a-Tpdrayo';
occur in inscriptions, Kkewise in Boeotian crrpoTo^ in numerous
proper names, a-TporicoTa';, ia-TpoTevaO-rj, but also a-Tparo^ in proper
names, arpaTay(ovTo<i. The forms with a, which are the only ones
attested for Thessalian, are to be attributed to icoivri tafluence.
in Heraclea, Sybaris, Locris (Heppodapidv), Elean Kodaptni;.
9] PHONOLOGY 19
a. The explanation is uncertain, and not necessarily the same for all
the forms cited here. For example, it is possible that the o of SeKoros etc.
is to be viewed in the same light as that of cIkoiti = West Greek piKaTi. See116 a. But the preference for o appears to he, here as in 5, an Aeolic-Aohaean characteristic.
7. e for a. For forms with e beside a which fall within the
regular system of vowel-gradation, see 49.2-4.
An actual change of final a to e is seen in Thess. Sie = Sid. Of.
Thess. -ec = -at (27).
d
8. Attic-Ionic r/ from d. Original a, which remains unchanged
in all other dialects, becomes tj in Attic-Ionic. Thus ti/j,'^, ^rjfii,
la-Trjfii, but in other dialects Tifia (a-stem), (j^dni (Lat. farl), la-Tdfii
(Lat. stare). For the contrast between this rj and that which repre-
sents an inherited e-sound and is common to the other dialects
also, note Att.-Ion. lirjT'qp, elsewhere /MaTrjp (Lat. mater).
But Attic differs from Ionic, in that it has d, not 17, after e, i,
and p, as yevea, olicid, x'^P^ = Ion- jeve'^, oIkCtj, x^PV-
a. The change of a in the direction of ij began in the Attic-Ionic period,
and was universal. The d in Att. X'^^P^ ^tc. is not the original d unchanged,
but a special Attic reversion to d, which occurred, however, before the newsound had become completely identical with that representing original e,
and hence did not affect the latter (so Att. jrpa.TTOi, but pjjTwp). That is,
the 17 from d was at first an extremely open e-sound, even more open than
that of original e, and even in the historical period the two sounds are
distinguished in the spelling of some inscriptions of the Cyclades. See 4.6.
6. The d arising from lengthening of a in connection with original inter-
vocalic vcr, (TV, etc., undergoes the same change, e.g. Att.-Ion. i<j>rjva. from
l<^va,, original *£^av<Ta. See 76, 77.1. But in rds from Tavs and irStra from
irdva-a, original *iravTia., the d was of later origin and was unafiected. See
77.3, 78.
£
9. t from e before a vowel.
1. Even in Attic an e before another vowel had a closer sound
than in other positions, and was frequently written «, as 0«o'? =
6e6<;, veiuK = vew. So, sometimes, in Ionic, as £?&)? = em?, Seto'/iei/o?
(Oropus) = Seoiievoi.
20 GEEEK DIALECTS [»
In several dialects the e progressed so far in the direction of t
that it was frequently, or even regularly, written i. Thus
:
2. Boeotian. The spelling is usually i, but sometimes e, ei, or H
(see 4.5), as diof, OeLot = 0e6<;, aveOiav, avedeiav beside avedeav,
®0KA,£t8as, ®6yv€LT<K. Such forms in ®£-, ®o- occur elsewhere, but are com-
mon only in Megarian. Other examples of o from co (so-called hyphaere-
sis, cf. 44.4) are Ion. op-r^, voo-o-ds, from iopn^, v£o<r<rds, Cret. (Hierapytna
etc.) Koa-p^vTC'S! KaroitKovTW, ETreo-TOTOv, Delph. miovTOiv (but also Troteovra,
38 GEEEK DIALECTS [42
OoKovTuiv), Heracl. TroLWTacrcn, e^eiroiov, Mess. Trotovn, Arc. ttXos from
*7rAeos (113.2).
6. e + ft) or Of. In Attic regularly contracted, as 4>t\a>vn, <f)i\ol
(but -^Bemv etc., see 45.1). In other dialects regularly uncontracted
em, eoi, or to), loi (9), but sometimes ft), ot after a vowel (see 54.2).
Ion. elSecoaiv but ttoioxtlv, avcoOeoirj but iroiot, Lesb. avaredeeoai,
Delph. ivKokeoi, evSoKecovTL but iroimvri, Locr. eoi'Tt, irpo^evioi, El.
i^aypeov, SoKeot but iroiov, ivTrotol, ttoioIto (also Troieot), Heracl.
aSiKicov, eyfTjXrjdicovTi, but ttoimv, Trotaivn, Cret. evdCcofiev, irovioi
((fxoveoi).
t\ + vowel
43. In the declension of nouns in -eu? the 17 of the stem is re-
tained, as in Homer, in Lesbian, Thessalian, Boeotian, Elean, and
Cyprian (a few examples also in early Ehodian and Coan), but is
shortened in the rnajority of dialects (/SacrtXeo? etc.), and in Attic
this is accompanied by lengthening of the second vowel, if o or a
(/3oo-t\e'ft)?, /3ao-t\e'a). See 111. This "quantitative metathesis"
seen in Attic is in many other words Ionic also (as usually from
Tjo = do, 41.4), e.g. iXeft)? (Herodas— Hdt. t\eft)? or i\eo? ?) from
tX7?o? (49.5), xpe'<"f^"'i' (161.2 a), TroXeft)? (109.2), Mil. t'epea)? (111.5),
also re'Xeft)? (Herodas, and, borrowed from Ionic, in Coan) = Cret.
tcXjjo?, though the usual Ionic form is reXeto?, re'Xeo?.
Cf. also the subjunctives with tj retained in Horn. OrjOfiev {OeCo-
fiev), Boeot. KovpovOeCei, etc., but shortened in most dialects, as Ion.
detofiev (Att. 6a)fiev), Cret. iv6icofiev, etc. See 151.2.
Contraction of rja to tj (but probably through ea, cf. 42.1) is seen
in Eub. 3 pi. elprjrat from *elpriaTai (cf. Hom. fie^Xijarai), elpearat
(Hdt.), and in ^aaiXfj etc. of Delphian and most Doric dialects
(111.3).
+ vowel
44. 1. o + a. When contracted, the result is o) in all dialects
(cf. ft) from a + o, 41.2), e.g. Att. ijSt'ft), Heracl. /teto) from -o{(7)a,
Tt/ift)i/a|, 'iTTTTwm^, etc. in "West as well as East Greek dialects,
48] PHONOLOGY 39
from -o-{f)ava^ (for Ehod. Ti/jLcival see 167). Cf. also co in crasis,
as Corinth, rcoyadov = to ayaOov etc. (94).
2. + a. Usually uncontracted (Att. ori), but in Ionic regularly
o), in other dialects sometimes a, e.g. Eliod. ^oddeco, Cret. ^oddim,Aetol. /SodSoeo), Att. fior)9ea), but Ion. /Sw^e'w, Lesb. ^ddoeco, Att.
^orjBpo/Mov, but Coan, Ehod. l3dBp6fj,io^. For Ionic <» from 077, nomatter whether ?? is from a or original ?y, cf. also oySm (once) =078o'j;t, and oyBtoKOvra from ovSoT^Kovra (with original ??), andHdt. PSiaai, v&erai, aX\oyvd)(Ta<;.
a. In the termination of jSodflds, /Sor/^os beside ^00.660%, /3(yqd6oi, whencealso fiodOim, fio-rfiim beside Lesb. ^aOoiio, Aetol. /Sod^octo, hj-phaeresis hastaken place. See i.
3. + 0. Eegularly contracted to 9 (on) or w (see 25), as gen.
Sg. -ov or -co from -oto (106.1).
4. + e. '\^^len contracted, the result is the same as from +(3), e.g. Att. eXctTTOu? (nom. pi., from -o(o-)e?) but Lac. eXao-o-o)?,
Att. BTjfiiovpyo^ (Ep. Brjfitoepyo^) etc., but Boeot. Xeirmpyo';, Heracl.
afji.7re\at)pyiK6<;, Att. \ovTp6v (Hom. Xoerpov), but Heracl. Xmrripiov.
So Heracl. 7rpaiyyvo<s from *'7rpoeyyvo';. Cf. also the crasis in Att.
toStto?, Lesb. (ovtavTo<;, etc. (94.2). But we also find uncontracted
oe, mainly from ofe, and, before two consonants, sometimes o
(" hyphaeresis," cf. 42.5 d), e.g. Lesb. ofiovoevre;, Xoeerad/jbevo's,
MaXoevTi, Arc. 'Eivoevri, Locr. 'OTro'efTt and in the same inscrip-
tion '07rovTiov<i (see 45.4), Meg. "EeXivoevri but "Eekivovrioi, Cret.
BoXo'ez'Ta, BoXoei'Ttwi/, later 'OXoVrt, 'OXoi'Tt'ot?. So beside Att.
Sij/iiovpyo^, Ep. SijiJ-ioepyo^, and Saiiiepy6<; (with ehsion, after the
analogy of compounds with original initial vowel in second mem-
ber, cf . <j>tkepy6<s) at Nisyrus and Astypalaea, the form of most dia-
lects is BriiMopy6<! (Ion.), Sap.iopy6<i (attested for Arc, Argol., Boeot.,
Cnid., Cret., Delph., El., Locr., Meg., Mess.). So Ion. dXopyo^ in
Teos and Samos.
45. Notes to 41-44. Some of the factors which help to account
for divergence in the treatment of the same combination of vowels
in the same dialect may be understood from the following.
40 GREEK DIALECTS [45
1. A combination which arises by the loss of f,being of later origin than
that arising from the loss of t or tr, may remain imcontracted, or be con-
tracted only later. So Att. TrXeo/nei/, ijSeos, ijSax, ij8e<i)i', in contrast to ^t\oS-
/t£V, yei/ovs, yevr\, yeiimi, Locr. 'OTrdevrt, later 'Oirmnm.
2. A combination which is otherwise uncontracted may be contracted
after a vowel, Att. ySao-tXems but aXtfis, Ion. MeyafSaTew but Uavafi-vu} (-ai
sometimes after consonants also, but not usually), erm, ereWbut Ovrj, 0vS)v,
aviodfOLri but iroioi. El. Sokcoi but irounro etc. (see 42.6).
3. A combination which is otherwise contracted may remain uncon-
tracted in dissyllabic words, Att. ircos, Bioi, £,iat, and likewise, though be-
longing also under 1, Att. veos, Dor. vd6%, Aads. Such words may be
Boeot. 6/3eXo'? (rarely early Attic), Thess. o/3eXXo'? (89.3) = o/SoXo?
(assimilation ?). West Greek SeiXo/iat, 87jXo/i.at, Boeot. ^eiXofiai,
Thess. ^eXXo/jLai, all from a grade in eX, = ^ovXofiai. See 75.
Cypr. SaXro? = SeXro? (but this is a Semitic loanword). Coan
eVeXoi', Lesb. eraXov, yearling (cf. Lat. vitulus). Cret, Corinth.,
Lac, Pamphyl. 'ATreXXwi' = ^AiroXXwv (o due to assimilation ?),
Thess. "AttXowi' with weak grade ttX.
4. Series ez^ (e/i), o;^ (o/i), o or av (ap,) {reivm from *T€i'6a), t6vo<s,
TUTO'i). Ion., Coan, Heracl. rdp^vm = Tep,v<o, with a/it from erafiov.
For f^Kart = eUoa-i, etc., see 116 a. For participles with ar beside
evr and ovt, as eacrcra, iarra = ovaa, evrei = ovre^, see 163.8.
5. Series ??, «», a (p'^yvvp.i, eppcoya, ippdyrjv). iXrjo'; (Lac. AtXe/ro?),
whence Att.-Ion. iXeca?, Cret. ?Xeo?, but Arc. iXao<;, as in Homer
60] PHONOLOGY 43
etc. For Heracl. ippriyela = iapmyela, Dor. etB«a = etKa, see 146.4.
eyKTrjo-K in Attic-Ionic, also in Lesbian and various West Greekdialects (though the examples are late and so possibly due to koiv^influence), but ey/crao-t? in Thessalian (also eVrao-t?), Corcyraean,Epirotan, etc.
a. Corcyr., Meg. IfLiraa-K, Boeot. lirTrao-ts, Arc. ivTratrts contain a differ-
ent root ira-, like va/m = Ki^fm. See 69.4. n-a./jia and related forms, fre-
quent in literary Doric, were employed in preference to ktyjim etc. in most,perhaps all, the dialects except Attic-Ionic. Cf., besides I/xtoo-is etc., Cret.
potvo<s, and many others (see also a, h, c), especially in proper names.
a. In several dialects which otherwise preserve p it is lost before o and0) (but not before ot), as in Homer, e.g. in Gortynian forms of opao), oii/ij,
i>6iu>, etc. without p beside piKwn, piKoxTTOi, poiKetk, etc. (p6v, povhy anal-
ogy of pa, piv, etc.). But the precise dialectic scope of this phenomenon is
not yet determined, and po is by no means unknown, e.g. Arc. po(t)XiKoa-i
(no. 16, fifth century; in no. 17, fourth century, 6<^A.ei' beside paarov, piKo.-
g-Tov, etc.), Fop6a<7(a, Cret. Bdpftos, Lac. Btupdia, etc. (see 51).
63] PHONOLOGY 45
6. Initial (rp yields hp, occasionally written ph (cf. Eng. which) butusually simply p, wliich, however, was pronounced as hp (or a sui-d p), as
shown by the fact that after the loss of p such words have the spiritus
but not found after 450 B.C. except in a late archaistic inscription
with TpayapvSo'i etc. Phoc. /cXe/ro?, alpei (Crissa ; sixth century).
Locr. Karaipei (also eVifoiko5, fierapoiKeoi, pepaSeKOTa, but see a)
beside ttoj?, 'O-n-oevn, Safiiopyov<;. El. [-n-ojipeoi once (also awope-
Xe'ot, but see a), but usually iroieoi, even in the same inscription,
fiaaiXde?, etc. Lac. hiXipoi, vapov, Taiapoxo, apdraTai (cf. Lesb.
46 GKEEK DIALECTS [53
aiidra, El. avdarop, elsewhere contracted to drd, drrj, as Cret. dra,
aTraro?, Locr. dvdT6{<i)), late tJ/Sa (51). Arg. At/rt, Aipovvaio,
itroCpehe (also irehdpoiKOL, but see a). Corinth. UoreSdfovt beside
HoreSdvi, AXpa<;, AafoirroXefio?, etc. Corcyr. phopalcri, o-tovo-
fe(a-)a-av, etc. There are no examples of intervocalic f in even
the earliest inscriptions of Arcadian (cf. 'iXaov no. 16), or Cretan
{alei, va6<;, foi/ceo?, etc.) except in compounds (a).
a. Even where intervocalic p is regularly lost, it may appear in com-
pounds or in augmented or reduplicated forms, owing to the influence of
the simplex or of the forms without augment or reduplication, where p has
survived as initial, e. g. Cret. irpoptLiraro, epaSe, and late SiajSenrdfjia/os. Hence
in any dialect such forms are not necessarily evidence of the survival of true
intervocalic p.
b. The use of p to indicate the natural glide before or after v (see 32,
36) is also no evidence for the survival of the inherited intervocalic p.
54. Postconsonantal p. The combinations vp, pp, \p, and also
a-p (in some cases ; see /) are preserved in the earliest inscriptions
of some dialects. The loss of p was accompanied by lengthening
of the preceding vowel in East Ionic, Central Ionic (in part;
see a) and Eastern Doric (Crete, Thera, Cos, Ehodes and colonies),
while in the other dialects, as in Attic, the vowel was not affected.
Corinth. Bevpov, Bev- Ion. ^eivo<;, Cret. irpo- In most dialects
^r)vo^, Cyren. ^iko- ^evo<;,'irp6^€vo^
^r]vo^, Rhod. GelvK,
Wir]VOKXrj<;
Ion. eovaro^, Cret. rivaTo<i
Ion. eiVEKa, fiovvof
Ion. Kovpr), Cret. Kcopa
Ion. ovpo'?, Cret. mpoi,
Ther. ovpo^
Ion. dpi]
Ion. KoXSi}
Ion. o5\os
Ion. Icrof
Ion. vova-o^
fokXt)?, Corcyr. tt/jo-
^evpoi;, aevpdpeo'i,
El. Sevpdpeop
^evpaTO<;
*4vpetca, *fji6vpo<;
Arc. Koppa
Corcyr. h6ppo<s
Arc. /cdrappo';
Boeot. Ka\p6<s
*6\po<!
Boeot., Cret. plapo<s
*vda-po<!
evaro<}
eP€Ka, fi6vo<!
Kopa {Koprf)
opo'i
apa
KaXdii
o\o<s
tcro9
v6c70^
55] PHONOLOGY 47
a. To the lengthening in East Ionic there are possibly some local excep-tions, but, in general, forms like ^ci/os, and especially n-po^cvK, are due toAttic influence. Similarly in Rhodian etc. where ^aj/os has survived. onlyin proper names, and in late Cretan where Trpd^tvos is far more commonthan Trpoliji/os. In Central Ionic the lengthening is attested for Paros andThasos, but it is uncertain how far west this extended. From many of theislands, both Ionic and Doric, decisive material is lacking.
6. Lesb. ^ewos, ewexa, in grammarians and late inscriptions, are probablyhyper-Aeolio, due to the frequency of w from vi, a-u, etc. (74, 76, 77.1).
Cf. also lara-oOeotcri in an inscription of 2-14 A. D. For Thess. irpo^ewtoBv
see 19.8; for Boeot. Aa/io^eivo, 92 a.
c. Diiierent from oppos etc. is Corinth. Uvppos (cf . Arg. Uvpflai, TJvp-
foXiov), probably standing for IIvpp^os (from *IIijp(r/ros with early assimi-
lation of pa before p), whence the IXuppos of most dialects.
d. An example of p after a mute is Corinth. ApivCa = Auviov. Cf . Horn.
eSSetcrev for e8pewev.
e. Tp yields tt or a-a-, with the same distribution as for original kl etc.
(81), e.g. Att. TiTTapa, Ion. TOTo-epes, etc. (cf. Lat. quattuor, Skt. catmras).
In West Greek reropes the t, instead of a-cr or tt, is due to the analogy of
other forms such as xcTpaTos, in which p was expelled between the conso-
nants. Cf. also ijpA^a-cK from *7jfuTpos (61.6).
/. The history of ap in pia-pcK etc., probably of secondary origin, is to be
distinguished from that of original intervocalic a-p, the treatment of which
is apparently parallel to that of tr/x etc. (76). Thus Lesb. vav<K, Dor. vdos,
etc. probably come from *va(rpo? (cf. vaita, vacr-crat), which in Lesbian be-
comes first *vapp<K (like dp-p-e), whence *vavp<K, vaBos (35), elsewhere vapos
(like a/xe), whence vcids, vecos (41.4).
55. p before consonants. Corresponding to Att. pijTpa, epprjOrfv,
etc. (from ppt]- beside pep- in epeoa, cf . Lat. verhum) we have El. ppd-
rpa (15), Cypr. ppera (70.3) with its denominative pperdco {eppe-
Taaarv, also spelled evpperdcraTv indicating an anticipation of the
p. Cf. a and 35. So also Kevevpov from Kevepov), Arg. peppejMeva,
appereue (with prothetic a), later apijreve, was spokesman, presided.
El. apXaveo'i, wholly (cf. Hesych. aXaveax; • oXoa-'x^epo)';, also aWa-
VTj? • aa<paX'i]<; and aXavi'i aXr]6e<;), is from a-pXa-, and related to
aeXkij<; (a-peX-), aoW.i]'; (a-pa\- with Aeolic o, cf. 5), aXjj?, Dor.,
Delph. aXia, assembly, Ion. (Hdt.) aXir} (also from apaX-, with Ion.
d from apa as ia dTtj, avakiaKw).
48 GEEEK DIALECTS [85
FP appears as ^p, indieating a pronunciation vr, in Lesbian
words quoted by grammarians and in our texts of the Lesbian
poets (^prJTcop, ^poSov, etc.), though this has become simply p at
the time of our earliest inscriptions. Cf. also Boeot. Bpavi8a<; beside
Fdpvcov.
In most dialects p was lost before the time of our earliest in-
scriptions and we find, as in Attic, initial p, medial pp or p. See a.
a. In the case of medial pp, which would occur only in compounds and
augmented or reduplicated forms of words with initial pp, the p unites with
the preceding vowel to form a diphthong in Lesbian (cf. 35), e.g. evpayrj,
avpr/KTOs (Herodian) from *i-ppa,yrj, *a-/rp7;KTos (Att. ippdyrj, apprjKro^'),
Horn. raXavpivoi from *TaA.o-/rptvos. But elsewhere the syllabification of
the simplex (or form without augment or reduplication) was retained
(i. e. pp with the following vowel), and later this pp became pp or sometimes
p, e. g. Arg. pf.pplp.eva., appireve, later dpijTeue. In Attic and most dialects
augmented and reduplicated forms have pp, as Att. ippridriv (etp-^Ko. is formed
after the analogy of forms like eiXricjia, 76 b), ippdy-qv, eppmya, Heracl.
ippyjya., while compounds also usually have pp but sometimes p under the
continued influence of the simplex, as Att. avapprjOm but also 6.vapyj6a<i,
Delph. hlpj.pprivwv (from. *-^pI-pp7]v, like ^p.i-ovo's, cf. Horn, irokv-ppr/v), but
also h-qiuprp/aw.. Cf . pp and p from a-p, 76 h. The development of medial
pk was probably parallel (cf. El. d/rXaveos etc., above), though there is no
example in Lesbian.
Consonantal i (i)
56. Original i almost wholly disappeared from Greek in prehis-.
toric times, giving ' or, rarely, g" initially, as in 6'? (Skt. yas), rjirap
(Lat. iecur), t.vyov (Skt. yugam), etc., yielding various results iq
combination with a preceding consonant (71, 81, 82, 84), and being
dropped between vowels, as in Tpeli from *Tpeie<: (Skt. trayas), etc.
But between t and a following vowel, as in 'iinrio';, it always
existed as a natural glide in pronunciation, and in a few dialects
this is expressed in the spelling. So, by the repetition of i, in
Pamphylian, as Sad, huapolai, etc., and sometimes elsewhere, as
early Arg. hd\uo<;, St/eeX/ia?, Ion. (Priene) Auoc^avr;?. Cf. also Arg.
Kapveiia<!, Ion. T^uot, dmuijv (37.2). In Cyprian a special char-
acter, which we transcribe j, is generally employed, though not
58] PHONOLOGY 49
uniformly, as in the Idalium bronze (no. 19) regularly before a,
but not before e or o, e.g. ijaripav but lepifijav, feirija but ei.6v.
The Spiritus Asper. Psilosis
57. The spiritus asper generally represents an original a- (59) orI (56), but in some words is of secondary, and sometimes obscure,
origin, e.g. iVTro? (of. Lat. equus; tTTTro? regularly as the secondpart of compounds, ''AX«t7r7ro9,''Ai'Tt7r7ro9, etc., rarely "Ai/^tTTTros),
^/iet9, a/*e? (cf. Skt. asmdn) with ' after the analogy of vfieh (with' from t). The sound was denoted by H (earlier B) until the intro-
duction of the Ionic H = ??, after which it was generally left un-
designated.i But see 4.7.
Psilosis, or the loss of the spiritus asper, is characteristic of East
Ionic (whence the sign was left free for use as t] ; see 4.6), Lesbian,
Elean, Cj^rian, and Cretan (i. e. Central Cretan).
a. Psilosis is shown, not only by the absence of H = A, but by the pres-
ence of phrases and compounds in which a preceding mute is not changed
to the aspirate, e.g. East Ion. d.Tr' exao-Tou, abr' ov, KaTawep, El. KaTUTTcdl,
Cret. Ka.TUTTa.iLa/. But psilosis is no bar to the retention of aspirated mutes
in phrases and compounds which were formed prior to the loss of the asper.
For they would be affected, if at all, only by the analogical influence of the
simplex, as Cret. KaTtoTa/xcv by LO-Ta.fi.ev. Hence East Ion. xaSoSos, El. Trofle-
Ad/xevos, etc. Cf. Mod.Grk. KoBiaTiqiu, dijiov, etc., in spite of the loss of the
spiritus asper.
58. Even in those dialects which generally preserve the spiritus
asper, and which, in distinction from those with psilosis, we may call
the A-dialects, there are many irregularities, partly ia special words,
1 In quoting forms from inscriptions, wherever the sign for the spiritus asper
appears in the original it is transcribed h, to be distinguished from ', which is
supplied as a purely diacritical sign, like accent marks, and the employment of
which is, in many special cases, of doubtful propriety. That is, the evidence is
often insufficient to determine whether the omission of the sign of the asper is
merely graphic, in which case we should transcribe the form with ', or due to an
actual loss of the sound, in which case we should transcribe with '. As a work-
ing rule we employ the lenis in quoting forms without h from inscriptions which
have the character or are of a period when it was certainly in common use.
50 GREEK DIALECTS [58
where by-forms evidently existed, partly due to the weak pronun-
ciation of the sound in general (cf. the variations in Latin speUing).
a. In several dialects the forms of the article, o, a, etc., appear regu-
larly or frequently without h, showing that in these proclitic forms it was
either wholly lost or more weakly sounded than elsewhere. So in Locrian
(nos. 55, 56) always d, never ho (cf. also k d), feni. d and ha once each; in
Delphian (no. 51) d as article (A 30, 38, C 19), but demonstrative ho (B 53);
Thess. KOI = Kol ot (no. 26); d likewise in some early inscriptions of Boeotia,
Pamphylia, Syracuse, Metapontum, and Sybaris. The same is probably to
be inferred for Arcadian from the omission of h in the relative, as av = a av
(nos. 16.14, 17.7), with which compare Boeot. 6s = tos (no. 40) and Delph.
as (no. 51 A 28) beside usual ho, hoa-n's, etc., though in most dialects the h
of the relative is uniformly retained.
b. Other forms which regularly have the spiritus asper, but for which
by-forms with the lenis are to be recognized, are : fi/i-ipa, but even in Attic
inscriptions frequently l/tepa. Mess, /car afiepav, Ther. eV dfiepas, Troez.
Kiirdinpov, Locr. afjiApa. tepds (hiepos, huapo's, in numerous dialects) , but with
lenis in Ehodian and Argolic, as Rhod. in icpems, Arg. lapofji.va.fji.oves (nos. 76,
77, with ho etc.), Epid. tapo/x/nm/ioves (no. 83, with Ao/iovoois etc.), Aegin.
lapwi (beside Aoikos = 6 oucos, xo = ki^' o)- So i-n-' iapeus in the Megarianinscription no. 92, in contrast to huapov at Selinus, is probably due to the
Epidaurian graver. For Mant. lepds, see d. rifj.w (see 57), in Doric dialects
a/i,€S .(Lac. TToff afii, Heracl. hafj.h), but also d/i€s (Coan ju.er' apjiov etc.).
Thess. d/ti/ie or afifiif ea-TrjKa, but also ta-raKa (cf . lo-TaAxa, for which, vice
versa, sometimes co-raXKa), as Thess. emfrrdKOVTa (no. 33), Mess. Kareara-
fitvoi, Amorg. KaTta-Tutarj's.
c. Several words which regularly have the lenis show secondary formswith the asper in various dialects. Thus Iros (from /reVos), but Heracl.
iraira-htrriptha (beside /tctos), Epid. irevO' err/, and frequently Kaff Iros etc.
in the koivt^ (cf. Mod.Grk. e<^€Tos), probably after the analogy of q/iepa insimilar phrases. tSios (from /ri&os), but Thess. Kaff I&Smv, and so often in
late inscriptions of various dialects (really koivj;), probably after Koff tKa-
<TTov. lo-os (from /riirfos), but Heracl. AtVos beside to-os, and e<^' mttjs inthe KOLvrj, probably after ofMioi. Locr. Ivre (cf. ta-rt), but Delph. hevTe, after
as = €a)s. Heracl. Aoktu (also Theran), hoKraKanoi, htwm, Delph., Ther.Atrards, all after cTrTd. So probably by a still further extension of the asper(e. g. after iweaKaiScKa) Ther. hiKaSi = ctxdSi (no. 107). dxpos, but Heracl.haKpoa-KLpm.1, Corcyr. Ad/cpos, and perhaps Delph. haKpodiva (?no. 51 D47).Delph. f(j)LopKiw, also frequent in the kolvt^, is a contamination of lirvopKem
69] PHONOLOGY 51
and ec^opiceo), while Delph. icjiaKioiJuu from d/cco/xat is obscure. In Thess.avypiw (i<f>a.vypa/dav) = Lesb. aypio) the asper, as well as the v, is probablydue to contamination with some other word.
d. Besides such special cases as have been noted in a, h, and c, there arein some dialects irregularities which seem to be due to confusion in spell-
ing consequent upon the asper being weakly sounded or on the verge oftotal disappearance, though even some of these may possibly be due to spe-cial causes. Locrian has -irevTopKuiv beside hopKov, 6<tw., 'kttux., Karifofievov,
vSpiav (A before v in hmro), and, vice versa, once Hottovtiov beside 'Ottovtiol,
and hdyiv for ayiv (cf . iiriyov). In Arcadian, no. 17 has ipMru beside hiiXuru,
iJoTcpas, and once hdv for av, and the very early Mantinean inscription,
no. 16, shows no example of h, though containing not only oiSe (see a).butotria, lAaov, and tepos for which hiepoi is fully attested in the other Arcadianinscriptions as no. 16 ; and among the brief archaic inscriptions there is anotable lack of agreement in this matter. Heraolean has, besides the cases
mentioned under c, opcK, opL^ot, where we expect hopoi, and hdpvrjO-Ls, hoi-
a-ovTi, for apvrjcrK, oitrovri. At Epidaurus, no. 83 has always drtpoi not hdrtpoq.
IT. Loss of Intervocalic a
59. Original initial s became the spiritus asper in proethnic
Greek, as in eSo? (Lat. sedeo, Skt. sad-), eiroiiai (Lat. sequor, Skt.
sac-), etc. At the same time intervocalic s was changed in the
same way and then lost, as in ^eVeo? (Skt. yawasas, "La-t. generis),
etc. Nevertheless there are many Greek words with intervocalic
0-, either retained by analogy as in the aorist, or of secondary origin
as o" from t (61).
This Greek intervocalic a was subjected to a similar process,
namely became h and was later lost, in Laconian, Argohc, Elean,
and Cyprian.
1. Laconian. Early iiroiehe, viicdha<;, evhe^ohai<;, TlohoiBavi,
AvhiTTTTOv, 'E\evhvvia, etc. ; later Tlahi(f)di, Tr/ao/SetTraAa?, vLKda<s,
also in sentence combination (cf. 97 a), as ku a(v)Tv («a? avri), ra
vj(epdv (tw ixvpoiv). But generally a is written.
Rhotacism
60. Ehotacism, or change of o- to p, is found in Elean, late
Laconian, and Eretrian, rarely elsewhere.
1. Elean. Final ? appears uniformly as p in the later inscrip-
tions, nos. 60, 61, e.g. rep, aip-arop, oircop, irdXiop. Most of the
earlier inscriptions show -? and -p side by side without any appar-
ent system. Ehotacism of intervocalic a is unknown (cf. 59.3).
a. In the earlier inscriptions p is relatively most frequent in forms of thearticle and the indefinite or the relative pronoun, e.g. roip, rip, op, and
61] PHONOLOGY 53
possibly the rhotacism began in such enclitic and proclitic forms. But evenhere there is great fluctuation in the spelling.
2. Laconian. Ehotacism of final s is seen only in very late inscrip-
tions, e.g. viKoap, Bev^iTTTrop, etc., confirmed by numerous glosses.
3. Eretrian. Eliotacism of intervocalic o- is frequent in inscrip-
tions of Eretria and Oropus, e.g. Eretr. exovpiv, Ovtopiv, iiriSrjfiew-
heixp-a = irapdSeiyfia, probably contain the suffix -a/Ma. Cf. Te'xvr]
from *Te'KCTvd. (So perhaps Delph., Locr. ix0o<s from *e;^To's, this
from *e/co--To'?. Cf. early Att. eBox<re etc.)
In Pamphylian vt becomes regularly {v)B (v not written, 69.2),
as Tre'Se = TreVre, i^dyoBi = i^dyavn. In Cret. dvTp6iro<i (cf. also
Pamph. arpoTroiai) = dv0pa)iro^, dvrpfjiov= dvSpeiov, it is uncertain
whether the preceding p or the following p is the more important
factor. Locr. (j)piv = Trpiv is obscure.
El. irda-Kco = ird(Txa> is probably due to the influence of other
verbs in -o-zcw (but possibly like (tt = (t0, cf. 63). For Att.-Ion.
hexofxai with analogical x (to Be^ofiai, after ^pexeo to ^pe^co, etc.)
68] PHONOLOGY 57
other dialects (and Ionic in part) have the original SeKo/iai {61
Att. SaipoS6Ko<:). ovSeK, firiBei<!, are replaced by ovdei-:, fii^dek, with
6 from B + the spiritus asper of el?, in later Attic and elsewhere.
It. Very late inscriptions show numerous examples of confusion, notconfined to any special conditions, as dSeXwos = dSEA.</>ds, <^peo-|8ur£jOos =irpio-fivTipiK, Lesb. vwapKOurav = WTrap^ouaav, Lac. 7roiSi;^dv = TratSiKw.
Interchange of it and ttt
67. Of the Homeric by-forms of ttoXj? and wo'Xe/ios, ttto'Xis is
fomid also in Cyprian, rarely in Arcadian and Cretan, and in Thes-
salian after a vowel, as ol rro\Cap')(oi, ap^cTToXiap')(^evTo<! (tt from
TTT, 86.2) ; TTTo'Xe/ios is found in Cyprian (gloss) and Cretan (rare),
and in many dialects as the second member of proper names.
Interchange of Labials, Dentals, and Gutturals
68. 1. Those sounds of the parent speech which are called labio-
velars and are commonly designated as qU, git, gV-h, appear in
Greek regularly as (1) labials before the back vowels a, o, m, and
before consonants, (2) dentals before the front vowels t, e, -q, (3)
gutturals before and after v. Thus ttou, irodev (Lat. quod, cf. Osc.
pod), oirolo^, but ti? (Lat. quis), re (Lat. que), Cret. oreto?,— 7re/i-
TTti?, n-efiTTTO';, but Trevre (Lat. quitique),— Xvko's (Eng. wolf), yvvq
(Eng. queen) beside Boeot. ^avd. But before t usually /3, <^, e.g.
/Sio9 (Lat. vivus), with 8 only in Heracl. ivSeSim/coTa = ifi/Se^ias-
Kora. Many exceptions are due to leveling between related forms,
e.g. ^eXo<; after /SaWto, Cypr. ireia-ei, = reiaei after -iroivd, etc.
Instead of irpea^v;, with analogical /S, several dialects have forms
with 7, which is regular before v, e.g. Cret. irpeiyv^ etc., Boeot.
irpKryele^ (see 86.3). Examples of the normal relation are Arc.
SeXXco = ^dXXco, West Greek ^Xop-ai, heiXop.ai (75) = ^ovXofiai,
Delph. etc. oSeXoi (49.3) = oySoXo? (but if from the rare early Att.
o/8e\o'9, /8 is analogical, as in o/8eXto-«09. Boeot. 60eX6^, Thess.
o/3eX\o'? may belong under 2, below).
58 GKEEK DIALECTS [68
2. But it is a notable characteristic of the Aeolic dialects that
they very frequently show a labial even before a front vowel,
where the dental is regular elsewhere. Thus Lesb., Thess. Trefiire =
<Tt9 = Tts, eicre = etre (for the character transcribed a, see 4.4) in
an early inscription of Mantinea (no. 16), though all other Arca-
dian inscriptions have the usual rt? etc. Cf. also the glosses ^epe-
6pov beside SepeOpov = ^dpadpov, and feXXw beside inscriptional
hiXXas = ^aXXto, and see note to no. 65 B 2.
Note. The fact that in Arcadian only the one inscription named shows
anything but the dental spelling need not indicate that the peculiar pro-
nunciation was locally restricted. It was probably colloquial throughout
the dialect, but not usually followed in the spelling, owing to external
influence. Cf. El. ^= 8 only in the earliest inscriptions (62.2), and see 275.
4. There are some pronominal forms with « in place of the
usual TT or t. Thus Ion. kw? = tto)?, KOTepo^:, etc. (but only in
texts of Ionic authors, inscriptions always showing the usual forms),
Lesb. oKai = ottj), Thess. k^ = rk, etc. Possibly such forms arose
in phrases like ov kqx; etc. with regular k after v (above, 1).
69] PHONOLOGY 59
a. Puzzling is Thess. Savxva = 8di>vr, (cf. also Hesych. Savx/nw- €VKav-(TTov ^v\ov Sai^wjs). Unless due to contaminationwith another root (e. g. thatof &IMO, SESav/xei/oi/, cf. Hesych. ^vOixov Ifnrprja-fiov), there is an anticipa-tion of the « element of the consonant, as in Xvkos.
5. A change of 6 to(f>,
that is, doubtless, of spirant th to /, is
seen in (})€S)v, ^vovre^ = de&v, Ovovte^, of an inscription found at
Dodona.
Nasals and Liquids
69. Nasal before consonant. The nasal was always assimilated
to the character of the following consonant, but was less distinctly
sounded than in the intervocalic position. With this are con-
nected the following facts.
1. The letter v is freely used for the guttural and the labial nasal,
as well as for the dental, e.g. 'OXuvTrto?, avjti, \av)^dva.
2. The nasal is omitted in the spelling, occasionally in aU dia-
lects, and regularly in Cyprian and Pamphyhan.
3. Complete assimilation to a following mute, though not regu-
lar in any dialect, sometimes occurred in careless pronunciation, as
shown by occasional, and mostly late, spellings, e.g. Att. ^n/S/SaX-
MivTcav (MiXtcov), kgvto {xeXro) in Alcman, ^CvTaTO<; {<piXraTO<;)
in Epicharmus, jSevnaTO'; (/BeXTiaTo? ) in Theocritus. iv6elv (iX-
delv) occurs in Alcman, Epicharmus, Theocritus, and at Corcyra
;
also in an Arcadian (Lycosura), a late Delphian, and a late Cretan,
inscription.
Double Liquids and Nasals in Lesbian and Thessalian
73. The combinations treated in 74-76, also 77.1, 79, have in
part a common history, since they all become double liquids andnasals in Lesbian and Thessalian, but in other dialects a single
76] PHONOLOGY 61
liquid or nasal accompanied by lengthening of the preceding vowel(if e or 0, to ei, ov, or r), w, according to the dialect ; see 25).
74. p, V, + 1, when preceded by any other vowel than a or o.
From *(f>eepiQ,, Lesb. (j^eeppm (gram.), Att. etc. (I>eeipa>, Arc. <j)e^pca.
From *KpU(o, Lesb. Kpivvco (gram.), Thess. Kpevvco (18), Att. etc.
Kptvm. From *«TeVtto, Lesb. KTevvm (gram.), Att. etc. KTeivco.
a. But if a or o precedes, epenthesis takes place, the result being thesame in all dialects, e. g. xatp<o from *xapi<», fioipa from Vo/ow, /Saivio from
6. Xi gives XA. in nearly all dialects, e. g. oAXos (Lat. aliun), o-riXXto from*<ttIXiw. But Cyprian has aUos (beside aA.(X)d), and Elean once aikorpux
(beside oAAa, oreAAw).
75. Xv. From *(7TdXvd, Lesb., Thess. a-TciWd, Dor. etc. aTaXd,
Att.-Ion. a-TrfKi]. From */36\vd, *^6\voiJLai {*Se\vop.at, *^e\vop,ai,
(in this word the vowel was already long). From *eKpiva-a, Lesb.
eKpivva, Att. etc. eKplva. From *efiev<ja, Thess. efievva, Att. etc.
ep,eiva. From *e(f>av(Ta, Dor. etc. e(j>dva, Att.-Ion. e<j>rjva. Similarly
fia; as, from *evefjLa-a, Lesb. eve/i/Ma (gram.), Att. etc. eveifia.
a. The dat. pi. of v-stems, as Troi/jLea-i, Saijuotrt, is not formed from -ej/o-i,
-ovtri, but from -acn (cf. <f>paa-i Pindar) with substitution of the vowel of
the other cases. But in Arc. hi^popvapjova-i the v also is introduced from the
other cases, and this secondary v<j is retained (cf. 3).
2. va + consonant lost its v in proethnic Greek without effect
on the preceding vowel, e.g. /eeo-ro? from *Kevo-To'? (cf. Kevrew), av-
a-Kevd^co from *avv-aKevd^(o, etc. So also Epid. acrTd<! from *avaTd<;
= avaard';, Delph. a^eroco perhaps from *av^eT6a> = *ava^eT6a) (but
see no. 53.17, note).
3. Secondary intervocalic va, in which a- comes from rt, dental +0-, or T before i, had an entirely different history from that of
original va, which was changed before the new va came into
existence. This va is retained in Cretan (i.e. Central Cretan, cf.
273), Argohc (mainly Argive, cf. 251), Thessalian, and Arcadian,while in other dialects it loses the v with lengthening, in Lesbianwith diphthongization, of the preceding vowel. Thus from *7rdvna,
78] PHONOLOGY 63
Cret., Arg., Thess., Arc. Trdva-a, Att. etc. iraaa, Lesb. iralcra. Prom*fj,6vTia, Cret. etc. */j.6va-a (not yet quotable), Lesb. fiolcra, else-
where nova-a or /iwo-a. From nom. sg. fern. pres. part, -i^r-ta, Cret.
Cf. also Kdppmv from *Kdpaa(ov (Cret. Kdprav, 81), in Alcman,Epicharmus, and Sophron.
a. Even in dialects which regularly have pp, p<r may be retained byanalogy, e. g. Att. drjpai etc. after other datives in -crt, KaOapaKs etc. after
other nouns in -<ns. So Arc. Travayopcrts. But even in these words there is
sometimes assimilation, as Att. Seppts, West Ion. ayappK.b. The divergent development of Ao-, pa; as given in 79 and 80, probably
depended originally on the accent, the retention of \cr, per (later pp), beingnormal when they immediately followed the accent. In aorists there wouldbe leveling in both directions, and the development is usually that given in
79, but sometimes that of 80 (Horn. Kc'Atrat, Spcre, Arc. <j>6epaL).
(T(T, TT
81. Att. TT = Ion. a-a- comes from ki, %t, and (apparently, see 82)
from Tt, or 0i, and is chiefly seen in presents like (jivXaTTco, ^v-
Xdaaw (ki), KopvTTco, Kopvaam (di), in femiuines like yX&Tra,
yX&a-a-a (p^t), neXirra, fieXiaaa (tj), and in comparatives like ^ttiov,
TJacrcov (ki), Kpeirrcov, Kpeaatov (tj). t/t gives the same result, e.g.
T€TTape<!, reacrepei (54 e, 114.4). Inscriptions show that Attic had
TT from the earliest times, the acr of the early writers being due
to Ionic influence. Most of the dialects agree with Ionic, but the
Attic TT is found also in Boeotian ((pvXdTTO), ddXaTTa, TreTTape<s),
Cretan (laTTa = Arg. eaaaa, KupTcov from *KdpTTcov), and Euboean,
at least in Styra, Eretria, Oropus (eXdTToav, irprjTTw, KiTTirj<;).
a. (T<j in late Cretan, as irpaxxaia, OdXacra-a, ^/aicto-os (from *rifu.Tp(K, 61.6),
is due to KOivri influence (in kolvti inscriptions crcr is more common than the
strictly Attic rr); after these also oaacys for earlier otto^ (82). Some of the
late inscriptions have 66 in words of this class, as 6a\a66a, tadda, also for
those belonging under 82, as 666aKiv, for original o-cr, as fereddi, and for
or, as id6avT£'s. For ad it is earlier (85.3).
66 GEEEK DIALECTS [81
b. Although the Thessalian inscriptions usually have a-cr, there is some
evidence that the dialect had tt originally, or at least in certain localities.
Aside from OdXaTra, ttitto., which are quoted as Thessalian, cf .the proper
names Kottu^os, ^vmoi, etc., and especially IleT^aXos from "ScttoXos (65).
a, <j<y, TT
82. Tt and ^t give Att. <t not tt, and Ion. a (early era often in
poetry, but never in inscriptions) in o(70<;, cnroao'; (rt), /ieio-o?
{*tie0io<!, cf. Skt. madhyas). A dental + o- gives precisely the same
result, e.g. eKofita-a, eZUaaa, etc. In all such cases most dialects
have a-a- or o- (for era- cf. Lesb., Thess., Delph., EL, Heracl., ArgoL,
East Cret. oacro<;, Heracf. fiecrcroi}, eSaaa-d/jLeda, ArgoL SiKaaa-eco,
ihiKaaaav), but Boeotian and Cretan have tt, e.g. Boeot. fierTO'i,
85. 1. (TT = a-6. The use of ar for a-6 (see 63) is mainly charac-
teristic of Northwest Greek. It is the regular spelling in Locrian,
as he\e<TTai, hapea-rai, and early Elean, as ;)^;/3eeo-Tat, Xva-daro, and
occurs with some frequency in Phocian, as Delph. irpoa-ra, hiKa^d-
cTTo, later r^iveaTm etc.. Stir. Oeerrcov, cnroTroXiTeva-aa-rai. It occurs
also in Boeotian, in late inscriptions of Orchomenus {cnroXoyiTTa-
a-TT] etc.), where it is perhaps due to Aetolian influence, and twice
in Thessalian {TreTreiaTeiv, eXeareiv, Larissa). But there are some
early examples in other dialects, as Cret. p.iaro'i (Vaxos), Lac. airo-
a-rpvOea-TM, ;)^/37ja-Tat, and in late times it is found in many parts
of Greece, even at Athens.
2. crcr = a-d. This is found in late Elean, as aTroSoaaai, (no. 60),
iroirjaaaai (no. 61).
68 GEEEK DIALECTS [85
3. 66 = <t6. This is usual at Gortyna and some of the other
cities of central Crete, as Xv(ra66ai, hare66ai, Tpd<^e(6)6ai, etc.
(also, rarely, t6, e.g. SeKerdai). But a-6 is found m most of the very
earliest inscriptions, and in the latest (here koivtj influence).
Assimilation, Dissimilation, and Transposition of Consonants
86. Assimilation in consonant groups. Many of the changes
belonging imder this head have been given already, e.g. under 55,
69, 74-77, 79, 80, 84, 85. See also under external combination, 96-
100. No notice is taken of assimUatioji which is common to all
dialects and presumably proethnic, as S\ to XX, etc.
This class of phenomena is one in which the difference between
colloquial and careful speech is most noticeable, as may readily be
observed in English. While some assimilations are so uniformly
effected that the unassimilated form is completely displaced and
forgotten, others remain colloquial only, the unassimilated form
being still preferred in careful speech and writing. This accounts
for much of the lack of uniformity in the evidence as regards some
of the changes mentioned in this and the other sections. In some
cases the spelling varies greatly even ia the dialects where the
change is best attested. Sometimes the assimilation is imiform iu
certain dialects, but evidently existed colloquially in others also
and only sporadically made its appearance in the spelling.
1. KT to TT in Cretan, wtti'= vvkti, Avtto? = Avkto<;. For
Locr. e(T) ra?, see 100. Cf. also SiaXeXerrai, ia an inscription of
Cumae.
2. ITT to TT iu Cretan and Thessalian. Cret. ^yparrai = yeypa-
irrai, irevTO'i = Tr^/ttTTTOS, Thess. Aerrivaio^ (AeTrTiWto?), ol tto-
Xiapxoi, apxirToXiapxevTo<! (n-ToXi's, 67), also ar tS? etc. ia external
combination (99.2). Cf. also Thess. 'At66v€ito<; = 'K^dovqTO's.
3. 0-7 to 77 (7) in Cretan, irpelyv; probably from irpeiayv';
(Boeot. Trpia-yele^, 68.1), irpeiyevTo.^, irpdyav, nrpeiyiaro^, late Trprj-
yia-Tov {Trprjjia-Tevw also Coan). A parallel change of aic to kk is
seen in Laconian glosses, as KaSixKop = KaSiaKOi.
88] PHONOLOGY 69
a. Note that the forms cited, as also Thess. irptur/Sim., are formed fromirpacr- (cf. also Cret. irpa'v beside irpiv), not irpeo-- as in Att.-Ion., Lesb.
wpia-^vi. Late Cret. Trpeyyevras is a hybrid form.
4. <7T to TT in Cretan, Laconian, and Boeotian. Cret. fierr e's
aXk6TTpio<s, Arg. 7reT|TjOii;oi' (cf. Osc. alttram etc., frattre etc. ia
Latin inscriptions).
90] PHONOLOGY 71
5. In hypocoristic proper names, where it originates in the voca-
tive and is due to the emphatic utterance in calling. Examples,though found elsewhere, are by far most frequent in Boeotian, e.g.
AyaOOm, Bi'otto?, MeVi^et, etc.
CHANGES IN EXTEENAL COMBINATION
»
90. The phenomena of external combination, or sentence pho-
netics, such as elision, crasis, consonant assimilation, etc., are found
in all dialects. But in Greek, as in most other languages, there is
a tendency to limit more and more the scope of such changes, andto prefer, in formal speech and its written form, the uncombinedforms. The iascriptions, Attic as well as those of other dialects,
differ greatly in this respect according to their time and character.
The following general observations may be made.
1. The changes occur mainly between words standing in close
logical relation. Thus oftenest in prepositional phrases, or between
the article, adjective, or particle and the noun with which it agrees
;
frequently between particles like Kai, Se, /^eV, etc. and the pre-
ceding or following word ; less often between the subject or object
and the following verb, and very rarely in looser combinations.
2. While the less radical changes, such as the ehsion of a short
vowel or the simpler forms of consonant assimilation, are least
restricted in scope and survive the longest, the more violent forms
of crasis and of consonant assimilation are the most infrequent and
the soonest given up. Thus, in the matter of consonant assimila-
tion, the partial assimilation of a nasal to a following mute, espe-
cially a labial, as in rafi irokiv, is very common in all dialects downto a late period and sometimes observed even in loose combinations
(cf. 96.1), but examples like toX Xoiyov, roiiv v6fiov<;, etc. are compara-
tively infrequent and practically restricted to early inscriptions.
1 Some matters which strictly belong under this head have been discussed
elsewhere, as the rhotacism of final s, treatment of final ys, etc.
72 GEEEK DIALECTS [90
3. Although the dialects differ in the extent to which they
exhibit these phenomena and ^ some details (e.g. Cretan shows
the most extensive and radical series of consonant assimilations),
the differences depend more upon the time and character of the
inscription, the degree to which the language has been formalized.
4. There is no consistency in the spelling, even as regards the
milder changes, combined and uncombined forms often standing
side by side in the same inscription.
Elision
91. Elision is common to all dialects, but, as in Attic, subject
to great inconsistency as regards the written form, which even in
metrical inscriptions is very often not in accord with the demands
of the meter. In general elision is most frequent in the conjunc-
tions and particles such as Se (^oSe, ovSe, etc.), re, ku, aXXd, etc., the
prepositions, and, among case-forms, in stereotyped phrases like
TTo'XX' ayaOd etc. The elision of a dipththong, e.g. Locr. Sei-
Xer' av^opelv, is comparatively rare. For elision in place of usual
crasis, see 94.
Aphaeresis
92. Examples of aphaeresis, which is only a form of crasis, are
rare. Ion. rj '?, firj 'Xda-aove^ (Chios, no. 4), Locr. I 'SeXcfiiov, e
''Xeird/iov, fie 'TToa-rafiev, El. fie 'vrroi, fie 'irtiroeovTOV, fie 'iridelav,
Lesb. cr[TaX\]a Vt.
Shortening of a Final Long Vowel
93. The shortening of a final long vowel before an initial vowel,
so well known in poetry, is occasionally seen in inscriptions, e.g.
Cret. jxe eKrfi (fir) exo), fie evSi/cov, etc., Meg. cTretSe "lKd<no<s. So
Cypr. e| (^ e|) with t from e (9.3).
Crasis
94. Crasis, mostly of icai or forms of the article with the fol-
lowing word, is found in the early inscriptions of all dialects,
94] PHONOLOGY 73
though the uncomhined forms are more frequent. As between the« phonetic principle," where the result of crasis is in accordance
with the regular laws of contraction, and the " etymological prin-
ciple," with lengthening of the second vowel as in Att. avrjp =6 avrip, the former is almost, if not wholly, predominant outside
of Attic.
1. o, 5 (ow), (o, + a (cf. 44.1). Ion. covrip, Tcoya>vo<; (rod ay&vo's),
with the regular contraction to to, where Attic has dv^p, TdyS)vo<;.
Similarly I^sb. (ht.) mvrjp, Arc. Karoppevrepov (Kara to appevre-
1 As the personal pronouns, especially in the singular, are of comparatively
rare occurrence in inscriptions, some forms are added which are quotable only
from literary sources, — but only a few out of the great variety, for which see
Kiihner-Blass I, pp. 580 ft.
121] INFLECTION 91
a/i- (Att.-Ion. rittr) or a/A-, vfx,-. See 76, and, for the spiritus asper
or lenis in the first person, 57, 58 6.
2. NoM. -€S in aU dialects except Attic-Ionic, where it wasreplaced by -et?. Lesb. a/i/xe?, u/i^e?, Dor. etc. o/ie?, i/xe?.
a. In late Cretan a/ies was frequently replaced by d/iiei/ under the influ-
ence of 1 pi. verbal forms in which Dor. -;u.£s was often replaced by the KotviJ
-/lev. That is, aft-iv for d/u.€'s after ^ipoiixv for ^ipofxjei. From d/xei', -ev wasextended to other pronouns and to participles, as ^jucv, tivcv, dKoixravrei;, etc.
see 68.4. Cret. dat. sg. tIixl, m. oTifii = orivi, and fi-^Sifii = fj-ijTivi,
from *Ti-aiu with the same pronominal sm as in Skt. kasmin, •
kasmdi, Umbr. pusme, esmei, etc.— Meg. (Ar.) ad = Tiva from *Tta,
cf . Att.-Ion. cLTTa, aaaa from *aTta.
129. The indefinite relative oarK;, otk.
1. offTK, with both parts declined, in various dialects, e.g. Locr.
hoinve'i, Cret. ol'rti'es, Boeot. mariva';.
2. oTt?, with only the second part declined, in various dialects,
e.g. Delph. ortvo?, otivl, Cret. orifii (128). Lesb. otti, regularly from
*6B-TL, and by analogy oTTtre? etc. Cf. also Lesb. oinraxi, oirira, etc.
La all other dialects the double consonants are simplified, presum-
ably under the influence of the simple rt? etc.
a. On account of Locr. /roTi (no. 56) it is generally assumed that the first
part of OTIS is not from a form of the relative stem seen in os, oerris, which
was originally jp- (Stt. ya-') , but a generalizing particle o-fo8, related in form
and use to the so in Eng. whoso, whosoever (Old Eng. swa hwa swa). But so
long as the one occurrence of Locr. port is the only example of a form with
f (even the other early Locrian inscription, no. 55, has Adrt), there is decid-
edly a possibility that this is only an error.
3. Neuter forms in -ti, with only the first part declined, in Cre-
tan, e.g. an = driva, on i.e. Sn = ovnvo^.
130. Cret. 6Teio<; = ottoioi;, but used hke adjectival o(Tn<;, as
oreto? Se Ka K6a-fio<; firj jSepSrji, yvvd oreia Kpe/jbara fie exei, oreiai
Se (sc. yvvaiKi) irpodff eSoKe. For the form (also Hesych. Teiov
TToiov, KpTjre?), cf. Horn, reo, reo), etc.
131. Interrogative pronouns used as indefinite relatives. So regu-
larly in Thessalian, e.g. /ci's ke 'yivveiTei = oo-rts dv yiyvrjrai, Sie ki (in
form Sid Ti) = Sto'rt, ttok ki (in form irpo'i ti) = on, <f>vXd<} Trotas kc
ySeWetret = (^wXtj? ottoiIi? (^crrtvo?) dv fiovXrjTai. Elsewhere the
use of Tt'? = oo-Tt? is, with some rare exceptions in literature, found
only in late Greek. In Cypr. oiri ai<; Ke = oa-n<; av, the indefinite rela-
tive force is given by the oVt, an adverbial form of obscure formation.
132] IKFLECTION 95
ADVERBS AND CONJUNCTIONSPronominal Adverbs and Conjunctions of Place, Time, and Manner
132. 1. -ov. Place where. Att.-Ion. ttov, oirov, avrov, o/xov, etc.
These are of genitive origin, and are specifically Attic-Ionic.
2. -ei. Place where. These are the West Greek equivalents of
the Attic-Ionic adverbs in -ov (above, 1), occurring in various Doricdialects, in Delphian, and in Boeotian, e.g. el, irel, irei (Cret. ai wei =eX TTOv), oirei, reiSe, Tovrel, rrjvel, avrel (Boeot. avri), aWei, dfiei,
li-qhajxel, ovOufiei. Here also, by analogy, Heracl. worexei = irpoae-
X&J?, and Delph. iirexei. The ending is of locative origin, and occurs
even in Attic-Ionic in ixel (cf. also eVei).
3. -Of. Place whither (also where), ol, irol, ottol, etc. in numer-ous dialects, as in Attic. With -?, Delph. 049. Cf. also Crop. tJxoi,
where, formed from ^%{ (5 a). This ending, like -ec, is of locative ori-
gin, and means simply ^Zace where (cf. oiicoi, 'la-ff/xol), but in these
pronominal adverbs the prevailing force is whither.
4. -VI. Place whither (also where). Cret. vt, oTrut, with -9, giving
Cret. avrap.epiv = av6r]p,epov. El. varapiv = vffrepov. Here also
Thess. div beside Lesb. at (also aliv Hdn.), Ion. au' (also aihaap.o's,
under perpetual lease) = usual ate?, ot'et, atVi/ (all from *at/ri, *at-
/riV, *a4fe9, etc., cf. Cypr., Phoc. alpeC), while a corresponding form
in -49 is to be seen in Cypr. iipak, forever, a combination hke Att.
98 GEEEK DIALECTS [l33
ets aei, containing i) = etri and ak from *alfi<s (omission of f pecu-
liar, but cf. Trat?, 53).
Cf. also Epid. avevv, El. avevf = avev (Meg. and late lit. avi<s is
formed after xw/ot'?), Dor. efiirdv (Pindar) beside e>7ra? = efi-irTj<i,
Coan, Rhod., Ther. e^av = e^fj<;.
134. 1. The conditional conjunction, el in Attic-Ionic and Ar-
cadian ; al in Lesbian, Thessalian, Boeotian (^), and all the West
Greek dialects ; e (^) in Cyprian.
a. ^ in other dialects than Cyprian is ^mply whether, e. g. Heracl. Tab.
(no. 74) 1.125. In Cretan there is no true conditional ^ beside at, as was
once supposed, but rather a temporal ^, for which see 132.6.
2. av, Ke, Ku. dv is only Attic-Ionic and Arcadian. In all other
dialects the unrelated «e, /ca is used,— tee in Lesbian (also icev),
Thessalian,and Cyprian, ku in the West Greek dialects and Boeotian.
a. Arcadian once had kc, like Cyprian, and a relic of this is to be seen
in the k which appears, where there would otherwise be hiatus, between dand a following av, which had regularly replaced k£ as a significant element
(probably through prehistoric Ionic influence, cf. p. 7). Thus regularly ei
K &v, or better tix av, since eik has become a mere by-form of « (like ovk
beside oi), but « 8' av. Once, without av, cIk tTrt So/ua Trvp hroiai, where
some assume a significant k in place of usual Sv, but best classed with the
subjunctive clauses without av (174).
h. In Attic-Ionic, ti combines with av, — in Attic to eav or dv, in Ionic
to rjv-
c. The substitution of d for al belongs to the earliest stage of Attic
(Koarq) influence in the West Greek dialects, but that of av for xa only to
the latest, being rarely found except where the dialect is almost wholly
Koarfj. Hence the hybrid combination a ko. is the rule in the later inscrip-
tions of most West Greek dialects.
3. KaC. Arc-Cypr. wa? (also kol, for which see 97.2), the relation
of which (as of the rare Cypr. kot') to icai is obscure. In Arcadian
this occurs only in the early Mantinean inscription, no. 16, else-
where Kai. See 275.
4. he. Thessalian uses jxa, related to fiev, for 8e', e.g. to fik yfrd-
^UTfia, TUfi fiefi lav . . . Ta/i /icL aWav (no. 28.22; rdv Be aXXavL 45 is due to koiv^ influence).
135] INFLECTION 99
5. vv, identical with -w in Arc.-Cypr. 6vv = oSe (123), and withHorn, vw, vv, occurs as an independent particle in Cyprian andBoeotian, e.g. Cypr. Svfdvoi vv, Bokoi vv, Boeot. aKovpv vv 'ev6a>.
6. tSe, in form = Horn, the, occurs in Cyprian introducing the
conclusion of a condition {IMirai then indeed, ISe then no. 19.12,25),
or a new sentence (tSe and no. 19.26).
PREPOSITIONS
Peculiarities in Form
135. 1. For apocope of the final vowel, see 95.
2. For assimilation of final consonants, see 96, 97, 99.— e? =e/e, 100.
3. For 6v = avd, see 6.— Iv = iv, 10.— cnrv = utto, 22.— Karv
= Kara., 22.— vTrd = vtto, formed after the analogy of Kara etc., in
Elean (viraSvycoK) and Lesbian (gram.).
4. iv, ek. The inherited use of iv with the accusative (cf. the
use of Lat. in) is retained in the -Northwest Greek dialects (El.,
Locr., Phoc. ; but once e? in an early Delphian inscription, no. 50)
together with Boeotian and ThessaHan, and in Arcado-Cyprian (Iv).
Elsewhere this was replaced by an extended form iv-i, whence ets,
e?. See 78.
Similarly evre = eare in Locrian, Delphian (hevTe, 58 c), and the
Northwest Greek koivi]. But Boeotian, in spite of iv, has erre
= etrre.
5. fJ.€Td, -TreSd. weSd, unrelated to fierd in origin, is used in its
place in Lesbian, Boeotian (probably in Thessalian too, though not
yet quotable). Arcadian (ttc, 95), Argolic, Cretan, and Theran.
(Most of these dialects show also /lerd, but at a time when koiv^
influence is probable.) So also in compounds, as Cret. ireBexeiv, Arg.
ireSdyayov, irehdpoiKoi = /leTOiKoi, ireSiov = neremv, and proper
names, as Boeot. YlehdKOiv, Argol. IXeSa'/cptTo?. The name of the
month HeSaryeiTWO';- or (by fusion of IleSa- and Mera-) Hera-
j€iTWO<i (or -to?) = Att. MeTayeirvuov occurs in Ehodes, Cos,
100 GREEK DIALECTS [l35
Calymna, Megara, Sicily, and Magna Graecia, where ireSd alone is
not attested.
6. •jrp6<!. There are two independent series of forms, one with
and one without the p, each with variation between final -? and -n.
2. a. -Tcov, formed from the third singular by the addition of
the secondary ending -v. earcov, as in Homer, in Ionic only. Acorresponding thematic (f>ep€Ta)y is unknown.
l. -<t6(ov. ^epea-dojv etc., the usual form in most dialects. Lesb.
i-TTifieXeadov (cf. -vrov, 5).
3. a. -VToo, formed after the analogy of 3 pi. indie, -vn. ^epovrco,
TiBeuTco, etc. in Arcadian, Boeotian (-vdm, 139.2), and the Doric
dialects except Cretan.
Note. Later Doric inscriptions often show the Att. -vt<ov beside -vt<o.
Conversely the later Delphian inscriptions often have the general Doric -vtw
beside -vtwv, which is the form of the earliest Delphian.
6. -(v)a9(o. Epid. (pepoaOo, Lac. aveKoaOo, and so probably here
(rather than under 1) Heracl. eTreKaaOw (cf. Coan iireXavra). For-oaOa from -ovadco, see 77.2. But Corcyr. iKXoyi^ova-dm comes from-ovffdco of later origin and with later treatment of va (77.3, 78), andit is possible to read (f>ep6a6o etc., likewise early Att. -oadrnv (4 6).
4. a. -VTav, with double pluralization, a combination of types 2
and 3. (fjepovrav, nOevreov, etc., as in Homer, in Attic-Ionic, Del-
phian, Elean, Cretan.
b. -(v)a0c0v. Early Att. eiritieKoadfov etc.. El. ti/mo^tov.
5. -VTOV, -(tOov, probably from -vrwv (4 a), -adiuv (2 &) with -ov
after the analogy of 3 pi. e^sepov etc. This is the regular type in
Lesbian, e.g. (fiepovrov, KoXevrov, iinp.e\e(76ov, and Pamphylian(e.g. ohv = ovTov), and also appears, probably through Pamphylianinfluence, in an inscription of Phaselis which is otherwise in theEhodian dialect, and in a Ehodian decree at Seleucia in Cilicia.
142] INFLECTION 107
6. -Taa-av, -adwa-av, with -v replaced by -aav (ef. 138.5). Att.ea-Tioaav, ^epeToxrdv (more rarely <f>€p6vTeoaav), iTniMeXeaOaxrav,
etc., after about 300 b.c., hence in later iascriptions of various
dialects.
Future and Aorist
141. « Doric future " in -aea. Except for a few middle forms in
Attic-Ionic (Hom. ea-arelrai, Att. irXeva-ovfiai, etc.), this type is con-
fined to the West Greek dialects (examples in most of the Doric
dialects and in Delphian ; in Locrian and Elean no futures occur).
Thus, from the very numerous examples, Delph. rayevaeeo, KXeyjreco,
Cret. atr&xrim (i from e, 9), 7rpa^iofj,ev, ^oaOrjaiovri, TeiaTJrai, irpa-
aia, Cret. rjixlva = to rj/ji,i,a-v (also Sicil. rip.iva, used, like Epid. hifiC-
reia, in the sense of rifxCeKTov), Cret. 6lvo<i (from *di-iv6i; formed
166] WOED-FOEMATION 121
from ei6<i after the analogy of hvdpcim-ivo'i), hdivo^ = delo'i, evBeo^,Att. aSeX<j>6<i but aSeXcfyeo^ in other dialects, Delph. jdiMeXa (cf!
ycifierr)^) = yafiijXia.
165. 1. -Tepo<i. Noteworthy examples of the use of this suffix todenote contrasted relations (not merely those of degree as in thecomparatives), as in Be^trepos, apia-Tepoi, are Arc. appevrepo'i, El.
epo-emirepo? (for at cf. yepairepoi, iraXacTepo^), e-qXvTepo'i.
2. -tSto? forming adjectives from adverbs or adverbial phrases,
as ai^io^, eiriffaXaa-a-iSio^. So El. 7rpoa0iSio<i (irpoa-TL^Cdv), Cret.
After the analogy of names containing inherited t-stems arose
also forms lilce 'Ap'x^iXo^o';, 'Ap-)(iSaiJ,o<;, etc. (cf. apxireKTcov) in
various dialects, Ehod. MeviSaiJt,o<;, El. Sai'/cXa/jo?, Coan, Msyr.,
Mel. AaLcrTpaTO<s, Nisyr. Aaccrdevrj^.
a. The well-known lengthening of the initial vowel of the second mem-ber of compounds, as in aviavu/ws, iraviljyvpi's, is seen in Ion. avnpideuTiK =Att. avcpLOeuTo^. To the analogy of forms like eirdfcoos, einyKOos, which are
of the same kind, is due the iira- of Cret. kwapoXa share (cf. Hesych. iinj-
^oX-q /xcpos) and Hom. e7ri?/8o\os. Cf . Karrj^oX-^ in Euripides.
168. Use of a patronymic adjective instead of the genitive sin-
gular of the father's name. Though occasionally found in literature,
as in Horn. TeXa/Movios Al'a?, this is the regular practice in prose
168] WOED-FOEMATION 123
only in the three Aeolic dialects. Thus Lesb. MeXavxpo<; IliO(oveio<:,
a. When the father's name is itself a patronymic form ia -8as or -tos,
the genitive is regularly employed in Boeotian ; so also in early Thessalian,
but later the adjective forms like 'EiriKpariSatos, Ti/xowiSaios are usual.
6. Under Koanq influence the use of the adjective was given up in favor
of the ordinary genitive construction. Thus in Boeotian the genitive is
usual after about 250 B.C. and occasionally found earlier. There is some
evidence that the Plataeans adopted the Attic usage at an early date. See
no. 42.
c. There are also examples in Thessalian and Boeotian of adjectives in
agreement -with appellatives, in place of a genitive of possession. Thess.
UoXviofaia cju/xi (sc. d <7T<iAAa), etc. See the following.
d. A genitive may be used in apposition to that implied by the adjec-
tive, as in Hom. TopytiTj Kefjiakij Setvoto ireX.utpav. Boeot. Ka(X)Xui«i e^i (sc.
a KvAif) TO Kcvrpovos, Topyivioi e/u,t o kotuXos koXos K[aX]6, Lesb. (r[TaAA]a
Vt 'SiOfveuu l/x/u TO NtKtai'oi (dat.) to TavKio (gen.) the son of Mcias, the son
of Gaucus, where VavKLo is also a patronymic adjective, but in apposition
with the genitive implied in NiKiatoi.
SYNTAX
169. Although the syntax of the dialects deserves fuller investi-
gation than it has received, yet syntactical differences between the
dialects are much less striking than those of phonology and inflec-
tion. To a considerable extent they consist merely in the conserva-
tion in some dialects of early forms of expression which have become
rare or obsolete in literary Greek, and in a less strict formalization
of usage. Some peculiarities have already been mentioned in con-
nection with the forms, e.g. in the use of certain pronouns (121-
131), adverbs and conjunctions (132-134), and in the meaning and
construction of prepositions (136). It is necessary to add here only
a few comments on certain uses of the cases and the moods. Someother, more isolated, peculiarities are observed in the notes to the
inscriptions.
CASES
The Genitive
170. Genitive of Time. The genitive of the 'time within wliich'
is especially frequent in the early Cretan inscriptions, although iv
with the dative is already the more usual expression. In both cases
the article is used, while in late inscriptions we find only ev with
the dative and without the article. Of. Law-Code, 1.25 Tuiyda-ai, rdv
TreVr a/xepav release within Jive days, but 1.6 iv rat? Tpial afj,epai<:.
So in Locrian, but without the article, rpiov fievov beside iv rpcd-
povT afidpaK, as also in early Attic inscriptions.
Aside from the adverbial phrases vvkt6<; etc., the use of the geni-
tive of time is most persistent in dating, as /i?;vo9 e^S6/j,ov etc., the
usual expression in most dialects. More noteworthy is the phrase
Kal troXeiMov (-co) kuI elpr)vr)<; (-a<s) which is common in the prox-
eny decrees of various dialects, though eventually replaced in manyby iv TToXefiai kt\.
124
174] SYNTAX 125
The genitive of time is used distributively in various dialects, asalso in Attic, e.g. ra? a.fxepa'i or ra? aixepa<; f€Kd(Tra^ daily, besideKar afiepav.
171. Genitive of the Matter involved, in legal phraseology. Al-though the genitive of the charge or penalty is common to all dia-
lects, the genitive is nowhere else used so freely as in Cretan to
denote the matter involved, e.g. KaTaSiKaKa-drd ro eKevdepo SeKaararepav^, ro SoXo ireine shall condemn Mm to a fine of ten staters
in the case of a freeman, five staters in the case of a slave, tS Se
Kpovo Kpivev decide as to the time, di peKacrro eypajTai as is pre-
scribed for each case.
The Dative
172. The adnOminal dative is more common than ia literary
Greek, and is especially frequent in the introduction to inscriptions
or their separate sections, e.g. El. d ppdrpa rok faXeioi^, Locr. rb
ififievoiev. But it is very rare, and most dialects have only the
subjunctive with or without dv (ku, we), or sometimes the future
indicative.
128 GEEEK DIALECTS [ill
177. There are some examples of xa with the optative in con-
ditional clauses, etc., as sometimes ia Homer (Kiihner-Gerth II,
pp. 482, 453), e.g. Locr. al k aSitcof avXoi (no. 56.4), Cret. at Ka . .
.
/IT) vvvaTo<i e'iri, Epid. at ica vyirj viv Troi'^a-ac (no. 84.60), Delph. el
Se [Ti'i] Ka icjjdTTTOiTO, i-jret icd n irddoi, Corcyr. a^' pv k ap^d ye-
voiTO, Ach. ecrre Ka airohoiev.
The Imperative and the Infinitive
178. Both the imperative and the infinitive are freely used in
prescriptions, often side by side in the same inscription. In general
the infinitive is more frequent in early, the imperative in later, lq-
scriptions. For the Elean use of the optative with the same force,
see 175.
WORD OEDER
179. A peculiarity of word order which is worthy of mention is
the position of rt? before Ka in the phrase at rk Ka, al he rt? Ka.
This is the regular order in the West Greek dialects, as contrasted
not only with Att.-Ion. edv ra, rjv tk, but with Arc. el S' dv rt?, Cypr.
e Ke <TL<;, Lesb. at Ke tk, Thess. al [fi)d «e at?, Boeot. rj Se Ka rt?.
Boeotian has also, though less frequently, the West Greek order
7] Tt9 Ka.
SUMMARIES OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OFTHE SEVERAL GROUPS AND DIALECTS
180. The following summaries, while not exhaustive, are intendedto call attention to the most important characteristics of each groupand dialect. These are indicated in the briefest manner, sometimesby a mere example, sufficient to identify, but not always to define,
the phenomenon in question, and these brief indications are alwaysto he interpreted in the light of the sections to which reference is
made in each case. Of peculiarities in vocabulary only some fewof the most striking are mentioned.^
To avoid needless repetition, many phenomena which are pecu-
liar from the standpoint of Attic or Attic-Ionic, but are commonto all or most of the other dialects, are usually omitted, e.g.
1. Original d unchanged. 8 11. icov = div. 163.9
2. d from do, dco. 41.4 12. al = el. 134.1
3. 7) from ae. 41.1 13. arepo<s = eTepo<:. 13 a
4. Absence of v-movable. 102 14. to-ria = ia-ria. 11
5. Apocope of prepositions. 95 15. <yivoixai = jiyvo/jLai. 86.7
6. itoXk, TTo'Xios, etc. 109.1 16. SeKOfiai = Se')^ofiai. 66
3. ovTO<;, ovra, etc. 124 6. Hypocoristics ia -ei. 108.2
221. The Boeotian vowel-system. ' The most striking and obvious
characteristic of Boeotian lies in its vowel-system. One peculiarity
consists merely in the retention of the original sound, namely that
of V as 11. But even this led to a change ia spelling to ov, while
on the other hand the v with its Attic value of m as a basis was
used to indicate approximately the sound, probably o, which the
diphthong oi had come to have. See 24, 30. The other peculiari-
ties consist in changes of diphthongs to monophthongs and of more
open to closer vowels, such as eventually prevailed everywhere and
led to the Modern Greek pronunciation.
The chief orthographical peculiarities, with the approximate date
of their introduction, are as follows :
I = e before vowels. 9.2. V cent. B.C. (in the epichoric alphabet
t, e, ei, h)
I = et.
224] SUMMAEIES OF CHAEACTERISTICS 141
contract in the Nicareta inscription (no. 43.VI). But most of theinscriptions are substantially dialectic until the second half of thesecond century B.C.
WEST GEEEK223. General West Greek characteristics
:
1. SiBcori etc. Eetention of t in the verb-endings -ti, -vti, in /rt-
KUTi and the hundreds in -kcitcoc, in ttoti (Cret.Tro/art), IIoTet-Sdv, TV, and some other words which show the change to o- inthe East Greek dialects. 61
2. (/r)iKaTt= eiA:oo-i. 116 witha 12. otto) = dTro'^ei/, etc. 132.73. rpt.aKa.TiOL etc. = -Koenoi. 13. <^epo|i€S etc. 138.3
116 a, 117.2 14. 'Fnt.-aeoi. But restricted in4. iBiKa^a etc. But restricted Heraclean. 141
in Argolic. 142 15. Put. pass, with act. endings.5. Toi,Tai — oi,ai. But Cretan 145
11. OTTT} etc. 132.6 22. Word-order at rt? ku. 179
a. Although, only a part of these characteristics are actually quotable
from every one of the West Greek dialects, some indeed from only a few,
it is probable that, except for the divergence of Cretan in 5 and 7, they
were common to all, and that the absence of examples in any dialect is
accidental. Thus, forms like <^£/9o/xc$ are attested for Phocian and most of
the Doric dialects, but there is no occurrence of a first plural form in Lo-
crian and Elean, and in Rhodian only from the time when -/itv had been
introduced from the kolv^, just as it was at Delphi before the end of the
fourth century b. c. The early substitution of the kolvq forms of the numer-
als and the rare occurrence of the personal pronouns in inscriptions, account
for the incomplete representation of 2, 3, 16-19.
6. The first ten of these characteristics are also Boeotian (217), several
also Thessalian (210), and a few also Arcadian.
224. There are various other phenomena which are common to the
West Greek dialects, but are not confined to them even iu the widest
application of the term. Several of those mentioned in 180 are often
142 GEEEK DIALECTS [224
casually referred to as " Doric," e.g. al = el, ^? = ^v, a/ie?, edev, ira/ia,
iKco, but none of them has any claim to be regarded as specifically
West Greek, with the possible exception of 77 from ae (41.1 with a).
a. Even of the peculiarities cited in 223 some consist merely in the reten-
tion of the original forms which must have! been universal at one time ; and
that TOL, Tat or pron. datives like i/uv still existed in East Greek in the his-
torical period is shown by their appearance in Homer. Some others also
may prove to be of wider scope, e.g. ottci, since ottov is, so far as we know,
only Attic-Ionic. But so far as the present evidence of inscriptions goes,
the peculiarities given in 223 are distinctly characteristic of West Greek.
225. The declension of nouns in -ev<; with gen. sg. -e'o? ace. sg. -97
is common to Delphian and the majority, but not all, of the Doric
dialects. See 113.3. The 3 pi. imv. -i'to) is common to all the Doric
dialects except Cretan, but the distribution of -z'tw and -vrmv does
not coincide at all with the East and West Greek divisions. See
140.3,4. There are various peculiarities which are West Greek in a
limited sense, but demonstrably not general West Greek, e.g. t^w?= e'/BCiTO? (125.1), avToa-avTo'i (121.4), irpocrda = irpoaOe (133.1),
'AireXKwv (49.3), \w = eeXat (Glossary), vt, ve'= Xt, Xd (72). Theuse of -tfcr) = -o'(B in certain verbs (162.1), of a-Kevom = (TKevd^co, andof yeXafii, e\afj,i (162.1,3,4) is West Greek, but how wide-spread is
not yet clear.
Northwest Greek
226. The chief characteristics of Northwest Greek as distin-
guished from Doric, including however some which are not com-mon to all the dialects of this group and some which are not
strictly confined to them, are
:
1. eV = ek. Also Thess., Boeot., 6. TraWois etc., dat. pi. But inand Arc-Cypr. (Iv). 135.4 Delph. only late and due to
2. /caXci/xez/o? etc. (El. -T]ij,evo<s). the N.W.Grk. Koivq. 107.3Also Boeot. 158 7. TeVopes etc., ace. pi. El.,Ach.,
3. <f>a.pa) etc. But rare in Delph. but not Locr., and rare in12 Delph. 107.4
4 o-T = a-e. 85.1 8. irapd at, with w. ace. Also5. 4We, Delph. AeWe = ¥<rTe. No Boeot., Thess., Meg., Lac.
example in El. 135.4 136.2
231] SUMMAEIES OF CHAEACTEEISTICS 143
o. There are various other peculiarities the scope of which coincides even
less definitely with the Northwest Greek dialects proper, but the spread of
which in the northern part of Greece is noticeable, e. g. masc. ci-stems with
nom. sg. -d, gen. sg. -as (105.1a, 2i), patronymics in -wSas or -dvSas (164.8),
proper names in -K\eas (166.1). Note also the peculiarities common to Boeo-
tiali and Thessalian only (204), most of which are not Aeolic.
Phocian (Delphian)
227. West Greek characteriatics. See 223-225.
228. Northwest Greek characteristics. See 226.
229. Aeolic elements : Traz^Tcaori in all the earlier inscriptions.
107.3. Here also, perhaps, the words Tayoi; (also Thess., Cypr., and
poetical), KepaCm (also Horn.) = Kepdvvvfu, 8iBrjfj,i (also Boeot. and
Horn.) = Seo).
230. Other characteristics, mostly in common with various other
dialects
:
1. f initial till about 400 B.C.; 11. rffvoi (Trivei)=iKetvo<;. 125.1
intervocalic only in a VI 12. poUfo — o'lKodev. 132.7
cent, inscr. 52,53 13. ex^o'?, exdo. 133.3
2. Pecuharities in use of spir. 14. evSo's, evSa, eVSw?. 133.4
The dicasts shall administer the oath, allowed to return.'— 41 ff. 'Of all the
receiving a twelfth of a stater as fee, Halicarnassians any one who does not
and the oath shall he taken In the transgress these things such as they
presence of the plaintiff. Those who have sworn to and as is recorded in
held the property when ApoUonides the temple of Apollo, shall be at liberty
and Panamyes were commissioners to prefer claims.'
—
two- o-unirdvTuv
:
shall be the legal possessors, unless they tQv (runrdiiTay. 96.2.
have disposed of it later.'— air£ir4pa- 3. Imprecations against evil-doers,
o-ttv: d7ro7r«rpi£o-Kai,notfound elsewhere. A 1 ff. Against those who manufaCT
— 32ffl. ' If any one wishes to annul this turepoisons.
—
t6|dv6v: adv.acc.,osa
law or proposes a vote to this effect, his community.— 6 ff. Against those whoproperty shall be sold and dedicated interfere with the importation of grain,
to Apollo, and he himself shall be an — avuScolt]: contrasted with 7roiorl.2.
exile forever. If his property is not See 42.6, 1676.
worth ten staters, he himself shall be B3fl. Againstthosewhoresisttheau-
sold for transportation and never be thority of the magistrates. The eOSuKos
No. 4] IONIC INSCRIPTIONS 167
Koi 76110? TO Keiv\o. outj? to Xoitto alcrv/Avcov iv Tewt ^ jfji ttii
Trj\\^r)i [aSiK](<o)9 ap(Sp)[a]<i a[7ro«]T|ei'et[e] . . . apov va [etS]|(B9 lo
^dvTcov 8' o^o(f)vXaK€<; • rjv Se /i^ 7rj097|fottrti', avTot o^etXoVTtuli',
must have been a superior official to assembly at the Anthesteria, etc'—the ordinary cWukoi or auditors. The 35 ff. Against those who damage the
alaviiviTTji is often an extraordinary stele.— Kard^ci etc.: aor. subj. 150,
official like the Roman dictator, but 176.2.
possibly a regular magistrate at Teos. 4. Decree fixing the boundaries of
•— 8ff. Against unfaithful and treason- a district called Lophitis, followed byable magistrates. The restoration of provisions for its sale and a list of the
11. 8-18 is uncertain.— 29 ff. Against purchasers.
magistrates who fail to pronounce the FortheLesbianelementsintheChian
imprecations.— The ti;«oOxoi are prob- dialect, see 184 with references. For
ably the regular annual magistrates, irpijloio-ii', short-vowel subj. like Troiiio-ei,
like the archons elsewhere. — iroi'/)o-e- see also 150. For 7r6Xeus, see 109.2.
ov: iroiijo-eioj'. 31.— Svvdftci: see 109.2. /Sao-tXeis (C 8) is the earliest example of
— Ka6T]|i4vo Tu^uvo; ktX. ;' during the eo = eu (33).
168 GREEK DIALECTS [No. 4
20 TrpTj^dvTfov 8' ol 'KevTe\KaiBeKa to? opo<^v\aKa's||
aio TO $^\|(Bi/o? 2T/3aT[i|o]? AfCTftj TOi«|[o']7re8oi' 8t7;K|[o]o-t(Bi/ ew'?.
B 'Inthecaseof alawsuit(5r/)^X*«'), from litigation. Whoevermakesthe sales
the Fifteen are to bring it before the invalid, him shall the jSao-iXeiis curse,
council within five days and make pub- when he makes the customary imprecor-
lie announcement of it in the villages tions.— lOS. Therepurchased lands andand in the city.' houses: from the sons of Annices, Hi-
C 1-8. If any one excludes the pwr- eesius, son of Hegepolis, for BS40 {sta-
chasers from possession or brings suit ters), Athenagoras, son of Herodotus,
against them, the city, taking up the for 1700; from Thargeleus, Fhilocles,
cause of those that are excluded, shall son of Zenodotus, the property in Eua-sustain the suit, and, if it loses, reim- dae for S700; etc.— 19, 20. Kolvoir(-
Ifv^rse them. The purchaser shall he free 811s : koI OlvoirlSm.
No. 7] IONIC INSCEIPTIONS 169
5. Errthrae. About 357 B.C. SGDI.5687. Ditt.Syll.107. Hicks 134.Hoffmann III. 96. Michel 501.
["ESo^ev] rrji. ^ov\[rji kuI rmi\S-tjficoi M]ava-(rQ)'K.Xo[v 'E]«;aT[o'-
fie 7r[\e'oi' 7r|e']i'Te yvvaiKwv, iralBat: Se t\S)v 6'\vy\aTpS)v K\a\ve:<^l,S)V,
3. o-TpdjioTi kt\.-. 'a clotli under- liome,.instead of being left at the tomb,
neath the corpse, one wrapped about — 15 f. ' The house is to be purified
it, and one over it.'— 7. (le KaXiirrev first with sea-water by a free man, then
ktK. -. they are not to use a special cov- with hyssop by a slave. ' But the resto-
ering for the bier, but cover all, the ration d[i/c]^r)[<' ^;itj3]tlKra is uncertain,
bier and the corpse, with the cloths — 20. At Athens ceremonies in honor
before mentioned.— 9. x^v: see 112.6. of the dead were performed on the
— 12. irpo(r(t>a7t(i)i kt\.. 'they are to third, ninth, and thirtieth days. Theperform the sacrifice according to the last are expressly forbidden here.—ancestral custom.' By the law of Solon 21. Directed against certain supersti^
the sacrifice of an ox was forbidden. tiouspraotices,thesignificanceofwhich
— 13 f. The bier and the coverings, is not clear. — 27. rairais : dat. in -ais
like the vessels (1. 10), are to be brought due to Attic influence.
No. 12] IONIC INSCEIPTIONS 171
aXXov Se fi[€]8eva. tov'; /ita[{i'o/ie'||i'ov?] \ova-afievov[<;] - 30
I
[{JSarJo? [xjvo-i Ka[6ap]ov'i evai eco -.
West Ionic (Euhoean)
9. VII cent. B.C. SGDI.5292. Rev.Arch. 1902 1,41 ff.
'n.v{p)po<; IX iwoieaev 'AyaaiXif5.
10. Cumae in Italy. Yl cent. b.c. IG.XIV.865. SGDI.5267. Hoff-mann III.6. Roberts 173.
heaTol cr(pei<; ^afiiai, Kal I dyKapva[<T6v^T(o Iv eTriKpto'iv Kal iva-
20 yovTCOII
Iv hiKaa-Tijpiov to yiv6p,evov toI irXriOei tos \ ^ap.iav.—M^ i^ea-Tco he p,T]he KOivdva<; yevecrOai
|
7r\eoi' rj Bvo iirl p.rj-
hevl Tuv epycov • el he firj, ocjjXeTcojeKacrT0<; irevTriKOvra Sapj(^fid(;,
18. Regulations governing building- whatever money he may have received
contracts. and withdrawfrom the work, ifthose giv-
1 ft.— , if any trovble arises between ing out the conlraxts so order.— 15 ff. If
the contractors on the same work, as re- any one makes opposition to the allot-
gards the work. — 4. diru xai : from the merits of the works or does an injury in
time when, relative use of the arti- any way, etc.
—
kAt A hi riva: el Si
cle, as in 1. 14 etc. See 126.— 6fE. If tk, detached from verbal phrases, has
war shall interrupt any ofthe works corb- come to be used independently in the
tracted for, orshoulddestroy any ofthose sense of a simple indefinite, as is some-
completed. Note the change of mood. times ef tis in Attic (e.g. Thuc. 7.21.5).
For 0S^pai see 80.—9. ir6(ro8a|ji irocvru
:
Ci. kclt el 84 ti \. S2.— 18. o<rai kt\.:
introduce the matter, Att. irp6aoSov iroi- with whateverpenalty seems best to them.
eiaBai.— 11. \ai|>upoirci>X(ov : Att. form — 20. to the court which is constituted
of gen. Instead of sale of plunder the to suit the amount of the penalty.—word must mean here simply plunder- irX^Sei : this, not irXiJfli, has recently
ing, ' the city being subjected to plun- been shovrn to be the correct reading,
der.'— 12 ff. But if any one who has — 21 ff. 'No more than two partners
made a contract has not begun on the for any one piece of work, and noworks and war interrupts, he shall return contractor to have more than two
No. 18] AECADIAN INSCEIPTIONS 179
eireXaaaaOmv|8e ot aXiaerraL • l/j^aivev Se rofj, ^oXofievov iirl rot (I
fjfiiaaoi, tS? ^afiCav. Kara aira Se kol ei k av [rji?|irXeov ^ Svo 25
euvere la sa tu = tvpptT&craTv, a ra leu ro = apyvpo, e se ta se = t<rTa<T€. Exam-ples of other groups are rare.^
1 In the Greek transcription the mutes are distinguished and the nasal beforeconsonants is supplied in parentheses. But e and o, not 7;, a, are used, in accord-ance with the practice adopted for other inscriptions where the signs 77 and a arenot in use. For some uncertainties in regard to the proper transcription, see 199.
2 We find me maname no i = luiivaiiAvot, ka si ke ne toise = Ka'a^iyverois but i ki
Words are separated by a special sign, but this is commonly, though notuniformly, omitted after the article, and sometimes in other groups of
words. In such groups a final consonant is often treated as medial, hencetapotoline = Ta(v) irToki.v, et<^.
19. Idalium. Probably V cent. b.c. SGDI.60. Hoffmannl.135. Sobn-sen 3. The first five lines only are given in the more exact syllabic tran-scription. In this
I
denotes the word separator, not the line division,
aiiv opKoif fie Xvcrai ra? ppera'i TaaSe vpai<; ^av.|
otti ai<; Ke to?
30 ppeTa<s TdaSe Xvae, dvoa-ija poi yevoiTV. Td<; ye 11 fa? Tdcrhe kuI
TO'} icdiro'; ToaSe oi 'Ovaancuirpov TratSe? /ca? to(i') iraiSov ol Trajt-
Se? e^oai aipei, o{l) i{v) to Ipovi toi 'E8a\teft loai.
kcLtos (of. 11. 20, 21) and is probably fa-, but this is very uncertain. —plantation or orchard.— 10. iravoviov
:
29. Whoever violates these agreements,
with all salable products (wpos), adj. may impiety rest upon him, that is heagreeing with t6(i') x^P"", tlie interven- shall be held guilty of an impious act.
ing Td. ripx'i-ja being disregarded, as For the force of tin, the formation of
not ooSrdinate. So in 1. 22 iraxowos is which is wholly obscure, see 131. Butace. pi. agreeing with Th(v) x^pov and it may also be taken as a conjunction
Tb(v) Kd-Tov (11. 18, 20). — *fols Sav : els («<^i?).
itldid,ptov(?). i/rats forever, 1Z3.6. fai/ ao. Monument to Stheneias, son of
is possibly connected with fi}tu and fiiu, Nicias and grandson of GaucUs. Seelive, on the basis of a third by-form 168 d and 38.
No. 21] LESBIAN INSCEIPTIONS 183
Lesbian
20. Cebrene. V cent. B.C. SGDI.307. HoffmaimIH32. Roberts p.324.Solmsen 4.
apxaK Trato-'ai? rah ep, ^cokm 7rX[e']|a9 r&v alpia-€(o[v]- rav Se
SiKav ep,p^vai,|
eVet' xe (oviavTO<i i^eXOrji, iv ef p'qvv^{(7)ai. al Se
Ke Karaylp^eOrji to y^pvaiov Kep\vav vSapecrTe[p]o[v] OeXoov, ffavd-
TO)i ^api\\a)tr6(o al Se «e airv(f)[v'\'yrii /i[^] OeXav ap^p\p^T'qv, 15
TipaTco t[o] SiKaa-TTJpiov otti xPV a\vT(o)v irddrjV rj Kade^p^evai, a
81. Monetary agreement between The Mytilenians are to issue the coins
Mytilene and Phocaea. Coins of elec- first (the cities alternating each year),
trum, a compound of gold and silver, The agreement goes into effect underwere issued by Mytilene and Phocaea, the prytauis succeeding Colonus at My-down to about 350 b.c, and it is to tilene and Aristarchus at Phocaea.
'
these that the inscription refers, though 4-5. t[6v S« K^pvavra]: Kipvayn, if
the term used of them is xp^aiav. correctly supplied here and in 11. 7-8,
'Any one debasing the coinage is re- has the same meaning which is moresponsible to both cities. If at Mytilene, forcibly expressed by Kipvav iBapiartpov
the magistrates of Mytilene are to con- in 11. 13-14. Another restoration is
stitute the majority of the judges. Simi- T[hii itpedpKovra] here and [k6wtoi>ti] in
larlyat Phocaea. The trial falls within 11. 7-8. The arrangements for trial im-
sixmonthsof the expiration of the year. mediately following show that the
If one is convicted of intentional adul- meaning required here is debase, not
teration, he is to be punished with death. make the alloy, i.e. simply coin, as often
But if he is acquitted of intentional taken. Moreover the electrum coinage
wrong-doing, the court shall decide the of this time and place was based upon
penalty or fine. The city is not liable. a natural, not an artificial, alloy.
184 GREEK DIALECTS [No. 21
Se rroXi's avai\no<; kuI a^dfjLio'i [eo-Jrw. eXaxov MvTi\i]\vaoi irpo-
6 vo'i iir][Se crTl|et;)^eT(o eVt fifj'\Sev toop. irapeymprja'av avrcot ot ev rdi
TToXi irpolaOe|
eovrei, dWa ajreixovrov eVl ravra rd KT'^p.ara ol
7rapx<i>pi]a'av['Ae<; avrcot, e« t&ji'] iv rdi iroXi irpoaOe eovrcov, Kau ol
crrpoTayoi eh I [avdt<; diro<^epov\rov eiri rov iv rdi ttoXi trpoade
eovra rd KTi^p^ara|
[m? p,r] (rvvdXXaj]fjieva tm KaTe\7j\v6ovTO<i •
10 Kal ol ^aaiX-qe; TrpoarlMBrfa'dov rSa iv rjat ttoXi irpoade eovn
CO'; rexvav Texvap,ev(o tq) Ka\[Te\'r]'S.v6ovTOi! ] /U.7?S' at we rt? SiKav
jpdcjiTjTai Trepl T^o'^vrmv, p,r] ela-d\[jovrov ol Trepc'\Spop,oi Kal ol
SiKaaKO-jTOi firjSe d\\X]a dpxO' P'rjBeia.|
[iTripeXecrddi Se] rot?
a-Tpordjoi'; Kal roh /3[ao-iX]7;a? Kal toU ire\[pi8p6p,oi<! Kal rjoi?
88. Measures taken for the settle- any of the property which those whoment of disputes arising between the remained in the city have surrendered
exiles who returned under Alexander's to lilm, but rather those who surren-
edict of 324 B.C. and the reinaining citi- dered it shall enter into possession of it,
zens of Mytilene. and the generals shall return the prop-
Most of the restorations adopted are erty to the one who remained in resi-
those preferred by Dittenberger I.e. dence, on the ground that the returned
But in many cases others are equally exile has not conformed to the agree-
possible. ment. And the /3a<r(\»;cs shall favor the
1 ff. ' The |8a(r(XTjes shall favor the one who remained In residence on the
returned exile on the ground that the groundthat the returned exile has been
one who remained in residence has guilty of fraud. Nor, if any one brings
been guilty of fraud. But if any one suit, shall the clerks of the court andof the returned exiles does not abide inspectors of justice, or any other
by these terms of settlement, he shall magistrate, introduce it.'— 13 fi. 'Thenot receive any property from the city, officials are to intervene if all things
nor shall he enter into possession of prescribed in the decree are not carried
No. 22] LESBIAN INSCEIPTIONS 185
SiKua-KOTTOK Kul Tflt? [(xXXaJt? apxaK ai Ke||
[nr) jivrjrai a.Trav]Ta 15
(B? iv T&i \(r[a<f)i(Tfian yeypa7rT]ai, KardypevTov|
[8e top aderevrd
Ti Tav iv TMi \jra<f)ia-fj.aTi yeypa]fjij/j,€vcov, co? Ke fifjB\[ev Sid^opovell) ToZ? KaTeXijXvdovTecra-i ir]p6'; roh iv rai iroXt
|
[wpoa-de eov-
Ta?, aXXa Sidyoiev ol 6taXe]Xu/ievot jrdvre'i tt/jo? a\|[A,aXot? avv-
woTrTQ)? Kal ave-7ri^ovXev]T(i)<i Kal ifipAvoiev iv rat d\\[TrvKpi<TL rat, 20
TW ^aaiXr)0'i Kal iv rajt SiaXvai rdi iv tovtcoi to)i \{ra\[^ia-fj,aTi.
SiaXXaKTUfi S' eXeo-^]at rbv SdfJi,ov dvSpa'i eiKoai, SeKa I [p,€v iK
TO)V KareXBoVTcov, Scko] 8e iK tS)v iv tm tto'Xi irpoerde iovrmv. I
[ouTOi Se -irpSiTov fiev (f>vXd<Ta'\ovTov Kal iwifieXecrdov gj? firjSev
ea\[a-€Tai Sid<f>opov rot? KaT]eXd6vT€a-cn Kal rot? iv rat iroXi irpo-
^lov crefjkvorara|Kal hid rav ^iXoSo^iav Se Kal rhv fieyaXoSdrravov
(66a). ipKiifv (infin.), avvreKii} beside with ' and Lesbian accent). But it is
the normal ;i«-forms K6.\riv, a-Tetpdvav, impossible to determine whether in
etc. (155.3) are probably artificial. such cases the koixi) form was adopted
miiji (1. 5), if correct, is a contamina- as a whole or only in part (cf. 280),
tion of vavov with Att. veii. 4ireypd<priv and moreover by this time little, if
(1. 36-37) is an aor. infin. pass., like anything, was left of the sound of the
6vT40riv, with e carried over from the spiritus asper even in the koiv/i. So the
indicative (perhaps only by the en- transcription chosen is of small con-
graver). With regard to psilosis, we sequence.
find Karelpuv, KariSpiaa, but 4(plKTouriii. 15 ff. He deprecated the excessive
The forms of the relative, being bor- honor, suitdble only to gods and demi-rowed from the Kotvij (126), are tran- gods, of dedicating a temple and nam-scribed with ' throughout (cf. also inghim founder, thinking it to be enough
i<t>' ot(Tiv etc.); and one might also pre- to have observed the judgment and goodfer iep4us and iavrdv (instead of ^ovtok will of thepeople, but the honors suitable
No. 24] LESBIAN INSCRIPTIONS 189
et?^I
T^v TToXiv Sideea-iv, Kal exnv iv rd KaXkiaTa 8iaXdfj.yjrei, reKal
I
airvSoxa, Kal KoXyv ek irpoehpiav, Kal a-T€<j)dvcov iv 7rdv-\\
reaa-i^ toi? aydivea-a-iv, oi? Kev a ttoXj? avvreXer), ev rd rdv\Karev- 30
. 30. Refers to the Thessalian bull- si. Decree in honor of Leon of Ma-fight, the Toupo/cofld^ia, or Tau/)o9i;p(o as tropolis.— 24. SlkpovvktX.. in the con-
it is called in another inscription of secrated places of the heights (?). ButLarissa, Ditt.Syll.671. in aKpow one suspects some error of
the engraver.
No. 33] THESSALIAN INSCEIPTIONS 195
TTiessaliotis
33. Thetonium, not far from Cierium. V cent. b.c. IG.XII.ii.257.Solmsen 10.
-e? hvkopeovTO<; <i>iXoviKd Auto?.|
@eTovioi eSoKav lidraipoi Tot K.\opiv9ioi KaiiToi kol ^evei Kal
Vs. 3. Here stood the subject of elsewhere, and, if the E is correctly
eTre/ujurar, the names of the donors. read, the dedicatorwas an Athenian or
The form of which the final oc is pre- Euboean.
served may be an adjective in agree- 38-39. Examples of the early spell-
ment with, or a noun in apposition ing oe and oc, 26, 30. For /rAera- see
with, 47a\/ia undei-stood. 526. For ^i with dat. see 136.6.
Vs. 4. (t>c<|>v\ax<ro : Horn. ire^tfAofo, 40. MoY^a: masc. in -a. 105.1a.
cf. 65.— 8£Soi : a rare imperative form — TijiTpiTi4>a,vTo (or reO- ? See 94.7):
which occurs in Pindar, and in another rat Ei)-, daughter of EuTprrri^dn-os. TheBoeotian and a Corinthian inscription, first part of the name is identical with
and is formed, like iyei, 7r(«, by the that of the Boeotian town which ap-
addition of a particle (cf . oiroal etc.). pears in Homer as Eurpijo-is. Cf. Eirpei-
For the whole verse ending, compare riSeies in a later Boeotian inscription,
h.Hom. 16 and 20, and Callim. 1. 96. See 6 1 . 3.— 6s : ws. 58 a.
36. Cf. Paus.9.20.3 Io-tiv . . . iv Ta- 41. List of contributions for the
vdypf, Kai tpos KtipiKtov, tv8a "EpiuTjv re- sacred war (365-346 B.C.). Byzantium
xS^TOi \iyov(ri. But here the epithet was at this time allied with the Boeo-
Kapixeiot is applied to Apollo. Ae/to- tians (cf. Dem.9.34). Note the reten-
$i{p)pet is the same as Aaiju>64p(rris found tion of the older spelling e beside ei,
as 7rpio-7ee! beside irpuryeles, Attic ai in iAe dedication. From iSpidw used like
'AXufaiwj' beside 'AXi/f^oi, and Attic Att. ISpiu. Cf. Att. i^lSpvfia used of a
gen. sg. in -ov beside -a. slirinemade after the model of another,
22. TOV virep ktX. : relative use of the as that of Asclepius modeled after the
article, unknown in the later Boeotian one at Epidaurus (cf . Roberts II.66.13).
inscriptions. See 126. Observe that in the catse of the repre-
4,8. Dedication of a tripod to Apollo sentative of Plataea the gen. sg. of the
Ptous by the Boeotian league. This is father's name is used, not the patron,
one of a series of four belonging to the adj. as in the case of the others. Thesame period (IG.VII.2723-27246). same holds true in the otlier three dedi-
d,4><Spi.aTev6vT(DV : those who serve as cations, and it is probable that this is
*i.fedptS,Tai. or official representatives at npt accidental, but that the PlataeanSj
No. 43] BOEOTIAN INSCEIPTIONS 199
43. Orchomenos. Between 222 and 200 is.c. IG.VII. 3172. SGDI.488. Inscr.Jurid. I, pp.276 ff., 509 f. SolmsenlS. The sections of the textare given in the order in -nhich they were inscribed (cf. 11. 30 ff.), but thenumbering of the original publication is added in parentheses.
[/c]^ TrpaTTwcra'i to Sdveiov Tav iroXiv kclt ra? ov-
'7re[/3]|a/u.e/3ta[9] ra? Idtaa'i avTrj, [dva]yKda'[d€'\v tv 7roXefiap\xv kt)
6 Tafj,(a<; aovyxo>pe.(o'avTO<; tS) Bdfia Sofiev|
[/cjar au[Ti'] av-
lT]a)v a-ovvypa<j}OV ttot Trj ovirapx'i'O"'] ovirelp^fifiepiTj, e\y T'\dv aa
treasurer had paid the money according upon provided. This is the only satis-
to the agreement deposited with Theo- factory interpretation of the most
pJiestus, be it voted by the people, etc. troublesome passage in the inscription,
40-41. viou|i.EivCi] irerpdrii : TerdpTj; though one difficulty remains, the use
lo-Ttt^^cov.- On nou- from WO", see 43.5a. of the singular oiirepa/ieptri where we— 46 ff. The polemarchs and thetreas- shouldexpeettheplural.—49. i[vT]Av;
urer were obliged, with the assent of the until, originating in iv Tav 6.iiipav. Cf.
people, to give a contract against them- 136.1 and note on 28.43.— kvovTo: for
selves in addition to the existing oirepa- this purpose. Cf . ir6pov iv ovto 11. 59, 60.
p.epla, until the levy for this purpose — ivevixBelei, not ivevix^ei, is declared
should be made and the amount agreed certain by Baunaok, Philol.XLVin,
No. 43] BOEOTIAN INSCRIPTIONS 201
ivevLxOeUi a av^opa iv ovro, «:[^] ||KO/jiiTT[eiTri] to, avvxtopeidevTa ^0
eHrj, al S'|e(f)iopKeoini, \hd\jravTa Ka\Kd uvtI toiv dyaOSiv."
|
50. The inscription is on a wall con- into the phratries and offerings for the
nected with the stadium, and Eudro- occasion were made by the parents.—mus, though otherwise unknown, was 5. Saparolv: cakes. Ath.3. 110d,114b
probably a sort of guardian hero of cites a S6.po.Tov meaning urdeavened
athletes. Hence the interdiction of bread and says the word was used by
wine. Note 0iipey (12), ^s t6 where we the Thessalians. The Sapdrai at the
expect ^p t6 (13S.4), and Kepalw {Kepale- Delphian festival were of two kinds
Toi) = Kepdvmiu, as in Homer.— |i.ETa6v- (of. 1. 25), the yificXa or cakes offered
o-dro : begin the sacrifice again. in behalf of the newly married wives
51. Regulations of the phratry of that were introduced into the phratry
the Labyadae. The Labyadae have al- by their husbands, and the TraiSflia of-
ready appeared in no. 49. fered for the children that were intro-
A 3. Toiv vdpious : Toii vifiovs. So duced into the phratry by their parents.' TOV vd/iovs B16, but usually s unassim- — 6. a-vfiirpa^ia KdiroSeil^u : I will eol-
ilated. 97.1. — 4. dircWaCuv: victims led and disburse. dTroSekwAu, like Att.
for the 'kwiWai. a. 11. 44-46 where iTroipalvu, render account for, disburse,
iyev is used with dTreWaia, in con- Cf . iw^Set^av no. 49.— 10. t»\ Aa^iia-
trast to ipipev with Sapdrat. 'Air^Wai Sdv: TUKAajS-, elsewhere unassimilated,
is the name of the Delphian festival as 1. 3. 96.3.— 11. I will impose the
corresponding to the Attic 'AirciToipLa, oath upon the rayol for the next year.
at which children were introduced Cf. B.27.
No. 51] PHOCIAN INSCRIPTIONS 207
"ESo^e Aa^vdBat<! BovKa-T\\iov /^tji/o? SeKarai eVi K[d]\fi7rov iv 20
the city, phratry, and gens.— 50. fteiid- pay five drachmas, and (the rayol) shall
Twv:probably established rites, institu- bring the case to issue by appointing
tions, though this meaning of ei/m is another in his place. Whoever convicts
not quotable. Cf.Ted/ids = Scir/ttAs, law, one guilty of an unlawful action shall
ordinance, C 19. receive half the fine (cf. no. 18.24^25,50).
Clff. Oath of the person appointed — 19ff. Law concerning funeral rites,
to act as judge. The missing conclusion Like the law of lulis in Ceos (no. 8),of B must have been the provision for this is directed against extravagance,such an appointment.— 6 ff. If the one — 20 ff. One shall not expend more thanchosen fails to serve as judge, he shall thiHy-five drachmas, either by purchase
No. 51] PHOCIAN INSCRIPTIONS 209
FoiKW T^v Se n-axellla'jv x^^aivav ^amrhv elfj^ev.|(al 8e ti tovt(ov 25
7rap/3aXXo|iTO, airoTeia-drco Trevr'^Ko\vTa Bpaxfid';, ai Ka fj,ri i^o/x,\6-
a-rjt eVt ra)i (rdfian firj 'rr\\eov ivde/xev. arpa/Ma Be h^v hvTro^aXe- so
Tw Kal jroiKe<j^d\aiov hev TroTdera)- tov B\e veKpov KeKaXv/^/jLevov
or {in articles taken) from the home.— on, is variously read and interpreted.
23-24. The shroud shall be thick and of — 39 ff. ' There shall be no mourning
a ligM gray color. For (paairds = *<paia- for the former dead, but every one shall
t6s, see 31, and, as used of mourning go home, except the near relatives.'—apparel, of. ^aid J/idno Polyb. 30.4.5, 45. RTJ-yYivoiv : or (£7;ir76i'ti)i' ? The read-
and ^aick ^o-fliis Ditt.Syll.879.5. — 25ff. ing is uncertain. See 100. — 46fi.
If one trangresses (jrap/SdXXw = irapa- There shall be no wailing or lamentation
Palvw) any of these things, he shall pay on the following day, nor on the tenth
fifty drachmas, unless he denies under day, noronthe anniversary.—JviavTots:
oath at the tomb that he has spent more. See Glossary, and of. ri, iviaiirw. in the
— 29 ff. (TTpupia Se ktX. : cf. no. 8.3^. same sense at Ceos.
— 31 ff. TOV 8« veKpov (ctX.: cf.no. 8.10- D 1 ff. Enumeration of the regular
11. — 33 ff. KTiv Tois <rTpo<|>ttts ktX. ; feasts. These are given in the order of
they shall not set the corpse down any- their occurrence, as appears from the
where at the turns in the road (but carry correspondence between many of them
it straight on to the tombwithout inter- and the names of the months {'Awc\-
ruption), nor shall they make lamenta- Xoibs, BoukcEtios, 'Hpoibs, etc.). For the
tions outside the house until they arrive identification of these festivals, see Ditt.
at the tomb, hut there there shall be a I.e., notes.— 5-7. 'Those which occur
ceremonyfor the dead (?ci.ii>ayli-w)un- on the seventh and the ninth of the
til the lid (?) is closed (cf.irpo(rrieriiiuTA.s month Biio-ios.'— 7-8. KT|uKX£ia Kop-
ft)pos,etc.). But the last part, from Tijrei TapiCria: /coi EukXcio (coi 'ApraidTta.—
210 GREEK DIALECTS [No. 51
10 ical Ad<j>pi[a K]\al @eo^evia kuI Tpax^M koX AtoaKovpfjia, Mepi\a-
Xdpria KoL Hr?/3a«:Xe([a],|km k avTO<; eirji hLapri[iJov km ka
15 XeKxol irapriL \k]\m Ka feVot /rot irapitovTW, hiap^ia ffvovre'; km
K\a wevrafiapiTevwv TvxnY • al Se n tovtwv irap^aX^ono rSiv <ye-
20 ypafifievcov, IOtoeovrcov tol re Safiiop\\yol Kol toX aWoi iraVTe^
els beside ^c with ace. (eis t4p XlriSKlav used of the citizen levies in contrast to
but iv 'Axaprnvlav), lwTeu(n beside iir- tlie mercenaries, Polyb.2.65, 6.91,95,
T^o's. and iinXeKTdpxv! Plut.Arat.32. — 24.
16. iin\(Krap\e6vTtav: this is the SLuara : probably connected with /idTiji',
first reference to iiriXeKrdpxai as mili- Dor. ndraf, and so having the sametary officials in the Aetolian league. force as the frequent dir\&s ko! d86-
For the Achaean league, cf. iirlXcKToi, Xus, e.g. no. 112.22.
No. 64] LACONIAN INSCRIPTIONS 225
T0^9I
'AKapvava<; ire^oK /lev ')(iKloi<;, itrvevai he eKarov, ow ko.
roi ap')(0VT^ ireiiircovTi, iv dfjLepai<s ef. Kal ei ti<s iv 'KKapvavCav
ifi^dXXoi iirl iroXefucoi, I ^oadoelv AiVwXoii? Tre^'ot? fiiv j^tXt'ot?,
tTTTreot? Se eKarov, iv a,fiepai<: e|, ow|
ku toI ap')(pvre<; Tre/iTroivTi.
el Be ifKeiovav j^peiav e^oiev arepoi TroVe/sot,||
^oaOoovvreo rpiajfi^ 30
Xi'ot? eKarepoi exarepoK, iv dfiepai<; Sexa. ras Se ^oadola<s rla?
airoaTeXKoiieva'i ecrroo to rpiTop. fiepo<; OTrXirat. irefiirovTm he Tap,
^oddoiavI
ey p,ev 'AKapvavia<; ol aTparayol twv 'Axapvdvmv Kal
01 (Tvvehpoi, iy he AtTtoXia?|ol dp')(OVTe<i t&v AItodX&v. airap-
^ovvTO) he Toii? diroo'TeWofievov'; aTpaTUOi^a's eKarepoi tow? ai-
ra>v diiepdv rpiaKOvra • el he irKelova 'x^povov e')(piev ra? ;Soa||0oia? 35
j(peiav ol p.erarrefiyjrdiievoi rap, fioddoiav, hihovrco rai a-irap'x^iai
ouTO hiinrov I /ee/c to awro Aitttto. I /cei/ 'Apiovrca^ ivixe 11 Aafiovov 25
oKTUKivI
0UT09 avioj^iovI
ivhefiohaK hiiriroi'; I e/e Tav auro Aitt-
TTOVI
Acex TO auTO AtTTTTO, /Cat 11 Ao KeXi^ evLKe A[a/xa]. I /cot 'EXev- 30
hvvia Aafi^ovov] I ivixe avTo? o.vlo'^^lov I evhe^ohai<; hiirtroL';|
in contrast to diro$tii<et of A, the omis- nes in sucA a manner as 7ie»er any one
sion of A in viol, ipiaovn (cf. 58(i); and of those now living.— 7. With his ownhis blunder in writing rferpaicdTiai was four-horse chariot, oiro reflexive as in
perhaps due to tlie Arcadian pronun- 11. 16, 17, etc.— 9. In the games of Po-
ciation (cf. 68.3). It is also possible seidon, with elliptical genitive as in eik
that in 11. 10-11 ~we should read, with- 'AiSoo etc. So ^k 'Apiow/as 1. 24. Toid-
out correction, i.v<pii^\iyovToi, with foxos = Horn. 7011)0x05.— 11,31. kIXev-
Arc. -TOI = -Tai (139.1). But the pas- hiivio: /tai 'EXeuo-(wa (20, 59.1), games
sive with /xrat understood as subject is in honor of the Eleusinian Demeter.
—
less natural tlian the corrected reading 12, 18. noho(Sai.a: XLoaeiSiivia (49.1,
usually adopted. For the reading iv- 89.1, 61.5) celebrated at Helos in La-
0i(X)Xe7-, rather than ivifiCKty-, cf. the conia and Thuria in Jlessenia.— 15 ff.
XX attested in other dialects (89.3). Seven times loith colts (bred) from his
For dreX6<j-9o see 140.86. own mares and his oion stallion.— Iv-
66. Record of the victories of Damo- hipohais htinrois : ivTiPii<rais being in
non and his son. The portion of the ^jSrj, young mares.— 19. 6evpCai: the
stone containing 11. 42-94 was only re- usual foi-m of the name is Qovpla.—cently discovered. 24. 'ApiovrCa : the name of some god-
3 S. viKdha$ ktX. : Having won victo- dess or heroine otherwise unknown.—
45 Koi Tiapirapovia iviKe 11 "EvvfiaKpaTiSai iraiSa'i|crrdSiov km Siav-
\ovI
Kdt 8o\f;)^oj' Kat ho Ke[\e^]|
/lita? ajiepa'; hap.d|
evi/ce. «:ai
50 AafiovovII
ei'iA;? Trat? toz/ eVjTatapo'x^o a-rdSiov kuI
|
[SiJauXoi'.
55 [«]al Aa/Jiovov evUej
Trat? tov AiOehia\\
a-TaStov ical SiavXov.
Kol Aafiovov ivLKe|TraZ? t'ov MaXeareta
|crrdSiov Kal SiavXov.
60 /cai Aafiovov iviKe||Trat? toz' Aidehta
|
ardSiov xal SiavXov.|/cai
65 Aap-ovov evUe|
Trat? t'oi/ Uapirapdvia|
crrdBtov Kal SiavXov,jj
«at
'Addvaia erTdScov.|
Autto 8e 'E%e/u,eW e<^o/3o[i']|raSe ei/iKe Aafio-
70 I'oi',I
'Addvaia ivhe^ohai<;j
hiiriroi'; auro? avio'x^idv||Kat Ao KeXe^
IMidiI
a/j,epa'; hafia iviKi, Kal|
Ao Auto? a-rdSiov hafid|iviKe. hviro
75 SeI
EiitTTTTOi' e^opov rdSejj
ez'tKe Aafiovov, 'Addvaiaj
ivhi^ohai's
hiTT'TroKI
avTO'! avio^iov Kal \ ho «re\ef /itta? ap-epaij
Aa/ia eviKe,
80 «at Ao Auto?II
a-rdSiov hafxd eviKe.jAutto 8e 'ApiaTe e(j)opov
jraSe
ei'i«e Aafiovov, 1 ei' Vaiapoj^p ivhej3ohais\
[AJiTTTTOt? auTO? ai/to^tof||
85 [wjai Ao KeXe^ fiid'i afiepa<;|
[A]a/Aa ez/i/ce, Kal Ao Auto?j(ndSiov
90 «al SiavXov Kal\
SoXi^ov fiia^ afiepaij
iviKov TrdvTei hafid.||
Aktto
Se '^^efieve ecf>opov|
raSe ei'i/ce Aafiovov,\iv Vaiap6')(p evhe^o-
haiiI
AtTTTTOt? avTo? dvioy^iov, \ [icjal ho Auto? o-raStoi' K[ai
67. Taenarum. IVcent.B.c. SGDI.4591. MicheH076. Roberts 265c.
Inscr.Jurid.II,p.235. Transitional alphabet. H = A and once tj.
5 'AvediKEI
Tot IIoAotSai't|
Nikov|NtKa(^OjOiSa
||«at Avhnnrov \
10 Kat ^iKap^iSav|
/cat TavTO,^ Trdvra.jecf)opo';
|
EuSa/iiSa?.||
eTra-
/coeI
Mei'ep^a/oiSa?|'AvSpofieSrji;.
36 ff. Victo_ries won by 'EKUAtoKparlSas the usual form is due to assimilation
(of. 1. 45), evidently Damonon's son (cf
.
to the vowel of the second syllable.—11.72, 79, etc.). The name (cf.'OraMii/tpi- 44, 63. Ilapiropivia : ndpwapos is the
Tos) points to an ^j»u/ia = 6miia, 6mfi.a, name of a mountain in Argolis wherewith an inherited e-grade in the first games were held.—49 ff. Victorieswonsyllable, which is seen in some of the by Damonon as a boy.— 54, 60. AiBe-
cognate forms of other languages, e.g. hia : games in honor of Apollo Lithe-
Old Prussian emmens, but was hitherto sius.— 57. MaXedrEia : games in honorunknown in Greek. Probably the o of of Apollo Maleates. Cf. Paus.8.12.8.
No. 70] LACONIAK INSCRIPTIOlSrS 229
Michel 1077. Roberts 265rf.68. Taenarum. IV cent. B.C. SGDI.4592.
Transitional alphabet. H = /i and ij.
'AvedriKe|
Ala-xp^ov|'ATreipora?
|
toi IlohoiSS\\vi 'RpaxX'^iSav|
6
avTov KalI
TavTO. e^opo^|RayrihiaTpaTO';.
|e7ra'/co II/juoto^J'ETrt- 10
a:i587?[s].
69. Thalamae. IVcent. b.c. Annual British School X,188. Meister,
Ber.Sachs.Ges.l905,277S. Ionic alphabet, but H = A as well as -q.
'NiKocrOeviSa'; tm Ilahi(f)ai|
yepovrevrnv avearjKe, I avroi; re Kal
ho T&) iraTpb<; 7r\aTr]p 'NiKO(rdeviSa<;, 7rpo^ei'n^\dha<; ra{<;) cnSi 5
tests were between boys is shown bythe use of TaidiKdv in many of the dedi-
cations, e.g. veiKdap t4 iratSm&i' p,iJia win-
ning the boys' contest in music {/iiia dat.
sg.), and by the appearance of the |8ou-
aySp leader of the /SoCai, the bands in
which the Spartan boys were trained,
orpovayhp p,iKKi.x^SSop.(vwv, leader ofboys
in th^ir tenth yea,r. According to a ^\os^
to Herodotus, the Spartan boy in the
third year of his training was called
luKt^6p.emt. This is from Dor. iukk6s =ixiKpbi, while lUKKtxtSSS/ievos is from a
diminutive in -ixos (original or for -«os?
Cf. TaiSixiv beside rraiSiKir).
A few of the dedications are in the
KoiPi}, and a few show Doric forms with-
out the specific Laoonian coloring, e.g.
viKdira!. But most of them, like those
given here, represent an artificial re-
vival of the local dialect, that is, arti-
ficial as regards its use in inscriptions,
but probably reflecting, though only
crudely and with great inconsistency
in spelling (e.g. in the use of <r = 6),
the form of speech which still survived
as a patois among the Laconian peas-
ants. Some of the peculiarities in spell-
ing are not characteristic of Laconian
especially, but of the late period, e.g.
ei = I in veixdavrep etc. , oi for o in Bwp-
eia, final « for S' in Bupeia, etc.
No. 74] HEEACLEAN INSCRIPTION 231
Heraclean
74. The Heraclean Tables. End of IV cent. B.C. IG.XIV.645. SGDI.4629. Inscr.Jurid.I,p.l94ff. SolmsenlS. Ionic alphabet, but with /r, andh = A. Only. Table I is given.
I
"E^opo<s 'Apia-Tapxo'i HrjpaKXeiBa • jli^?|'ATreXXaio? • ha tto-
Xt? Kai roi 6pi(TTai,|^ Tpi-jrov; ^iXa)vv/j,o<; ZwTrvpia-KO), I we icapv-
Ketov 'ATToXXtui'to? HrjpaKXiJTO),|[ai TreXra Aaft/tio? Uvppco, lev 5
dplva^I
<l>iXt0Ta9 HtcTTteto), Tie eiria-TvKiov|H?7jOa«;XeiSa? Zairvpco,
Aiovva-oM.I
Aveypayjrav toI bpLarai roi haipeOevTa eirl tq)? 'xa>pm^ to)?
hiapay; rm? raJ Aiovvcra),|
<J>tXt6i'u/io? ZtoirvpLcrKa),'
AttoWcovioi
HtjpaKXijTa), Atift/io? IIvp/sco, <I>tXwTa? HicrTtetis),||Hiy/ja/eXeiSa? lo
Zmtrvpo), Kada [m/ajt^ai' «at erepfia^av Koi avvefieTprjaav koL
ip,epi\^av rS)v H.T)paK\eicov Siukvovtcov iv KaTaKKrjrmi aXlai.
'^vveiieTprjaanei 8e ap^ajjid^voL airo tS> avTOfim tS> hv-rrep IXavSo-
and wooded, land.— 3Q. 6.iro\&\r\: had who had appropriated it to private
SeejiJos*, i.e. by private encroachment. use (11. 47 ff.).— 49. SCxas rpioKoo-ToC-
This land the commissioners restored to os: suits which had to be tried withinDionysus, bringing suits against those thiHy days, Cf , no. 56.42 and the Attic
No. 74] HERACLEAN INSCRIPTION 233
iroiovraaatv. havra ifiia-OmOt] [ha 7a] Kara /Si'to|
\h6(T<Ta]v A[a]|-
/Ltes Kar€ao}i(Ta/j.€<; Tpia/carimv /ieSifivcov to /reVo? heKaarov, I ha Se
Trdaa ya ha tS) Aiovvaco rerpaKaTiav SeKa fieSi/j-vtov /caSIStyo? to
/rcTO? heKacTTOv.
'Eo-Tacra/ie? Se /cat o/aeo? eVt fiev Ta<;|7r\evpidSo<: aveo, heva fiev
hexdaTav p,T) p^iov ^ Teropa eV Tav I SvvaTav ydv eXot'o? e^ev ai
Se Ka fiTi (f>dvTi TOi fie/J.i(r9afievoi SvvaTav rjfiev e\aia<i eWev, toI
iroXtavop-oi toI ael iirl tmv peremv evTe<i Kal ai Tivd<; ku oWw?TOi •jToXtavo/JLOi TTodelXcovTai airb to) Safim, ofwaavTe^ SoKi/xd^ovTi
Kai avavyeXiovTi iv dXiai 0acrdp,evoi Tav I ydv ttot Tav Toiv eiri-
X<opia)v. eirip^XriaovTai Se Kal tS>v huirapxovTcov BevSpeeov • ai Se
Tivd KaII
yqpai rj dvep-wi eKireTcovTi, avTol he^ovTi. touto Se irdvTa 120
have leased, or devise it by will, or seU originally fixed. The afiTdXTnia is the
the harvest rights, those who take it over re-bargaining, hence concretely the
or those to whom it has been willed, or amount involved in it, the rebate. Cf.
those who purchase the harvest rights, also 11. 155 ff. be surety for the rentals,
shall furnish sureties in the same man- fines, rebates, and judgments, hdfuil.
ner as the one who leased it in the be- 111 seems from its position to go with
ginning.— 108. hda-ns Si Ka |ii) irord'yei ttov as well as with twi Trpdriat fuirffd)-
kt\. : ' whoever fails to fulfill his obli- /aari. For the whole situation, cf . from
gations shall pay not only double the a Delian inscription, B.C.H.XIV,432
rental for the year, but also, all together aveiu(T0iia-afi.ei' Si Kal t^s Xopirc/as rb ii4-
with the first rental, whatever rebate, pos, iiiltrduro M>T;<ri/«ixos, ow KaBiffriv-
namely the decrease allowed in re- tos rois ^TTrfous Miniaifuixov, t4
leasing for the firet five years, is deter- Si \oiiror, &rwi cXaTToK ijJpei/ ^ 7^ iva-
mined by decree.' To insure leasing fu<rdw6ei<Ta, i0e/X« Mi^jo-i/noxos kt\.—the land again it was generally neces- 120. iKir^Tuvri : f-irerov, aor. of ThrTu,
gary to offer it ?it a rental le§s than that occurs also io Pindar and Alcaeus and
236 GREEK DIALECTS [No. 74
Tre^UTeW/tieVa iraphe^ovTi koI evhe^iwKOTa, hoaaa iv rai avvOrjKai
yeypdyjrarai, iv tcoi irefnnociL Kal Se/carcoL ferei airo tco Trorej^et
^elreo? 17 'Apicrricov i^opevei • al Se ica jxr] 7re<f>VT€VKa>vn kut ra
aovTi ovSe avvhep^ovTi ovSe KcoXvaovTt iropeveaOai • hoTi Se Ka
to-6tcov ti TTOilavTi irdp Tav crvvOrJKav, toI 'rroXiav6p,oi toI ae? eTri Tm135 fereo'i e'irLKaTa^a(Xi)ovTt, Kal ^afiuocrovTt,
||d)(^pi hS) Ka d<f>op,oia>-
a-covTi KdT Tav avvdrjKav. ov Koyjrei Se tmv SevSpecov oi/Se dpavaet
oiSe Trpicoael|
ovSe hri<! oiiSe hev ovSe dXXo<s Trjvcai. oiSe yaia)va<!
drjcrel irdp t.o)? huirdpj^pvTaii ovSe erapfievcrel,|al fir) hoaera Ka iv
is probably the form of all dialects ex- and canals which run through the lands
cept Attic-Ionic, where cTcaov shows they shall not dig deeper nor make aa change of t to o- which does not fall breach in for the water, nor shaXl they
under the usual conditions (61) and is dam in or dam off the water.— i^lf-not certainly explained.— 122. KareSi- Jovti, a^lpi/avn, o-uvhtpjovri : these be-
Kdo-Bcv: have been condemned, i.e. are long with Ion. ivipya (Horn, also diro-
hereby condemned in advance. Cf. ^p7w), amipyu, etc. from fi/iyu, whileTpoKaSSeSiKiaBia 1. 171.— 128. imPtji: Att. &Treipyui etc. are from ^ipipyutrespasses, from iinpdu = inpaba.— with prothetic c. The spiritus asper is
130 £f. Tds hi Tp4<}><i)5 kt\. ; the ditchfs found mainly, as here, with the forms
No. 74] HEEACLEAN IKSCEIPTION 237
avrai tm yai hdi (ienUQaTai olKoS6fj,rjrai, ovSe TO<f>iaiva<! iv rai
hiapai yai iroi'qa-el\ovhe SXKov iaael • al Se /xtj, hvir6XQyo<; itya-rj-
rai Aw? Tav hiapav yav aBiKimv. oUoBo/jiria-rjTai Se koX oi\Kiav iv
T04S j^«/30t9 TOVTOK, ^o&vu, fiv^ov, dxvpiov, Tov fisv j3oS)va TO nlvlia.KO'i fiKUTi Kol Sv&v iropSiv, TO Se eSpo? hoKTw koI Sexa irohav, 140
TOV Se a)(vpiov p,}/ p,dov to pev paKo<; ho/cTm koX SeKa ttoSmv, I to
Be evpo<i irevTe Koi BeKa ttoSmv, tov Be pvyov TreVre Koi Bma tto-
Bmv TravTai. tuvtu Be Trape^ovTi olKo\Bopripeva xal cneyopeva koI
TeBvpmpAva iv rot? ')(p6voi.'s iv hoi's xal tA BevBpea Bet 'ir€(f>VTevK7J-
pev al]
Be pri, KaTeSiKaa-Oev Trap pev tov ^oava pe^ pva<i apyv-
pico, Trap Be tov a)(vpiov TeTopa'i pva'i apyvpico, I Trhp Be tov pvyov
Tph pvav apyvpi<o. tS)V Be ^vXcov twv iv tok Bpvpol<s ovBe Tav iv
TOt? (TKipoK ov 7ra>\'^\crovTt ovBk KOfjrovn ovSe ipirpriaovTi ovBe 145
aXkov idaovTi al Be p-q, hviroXoyoi eaaovTai kclt tA? priTpa<} I icaX
KOLT Tctv avvdiJKav. e? Be to, iiroiKia y^^p'^aov^Tai ^vXok e? t^v oIko-
Aarol Ka\l raprdfiiri dWav, (j)epv\dv roi 9ioi KpiOdv /ieSilfifiVitv,
15. o-evT^pas: devr^pas. See 97.4. the ramp leading to the shrine, and the
83. From the temple of the Pythian area; have rearranged the attars andApollo mentioned by Paus.2.24. the colossi, have leveled the area, built
2 fi. S(f>vp^8a$, NareXidSas, etc.: a stone wall by the ... , strengthened
designation of the phratry or gens.— the doors of the temple, and dedicated
6 ff . Have had made and put in place, cups and a silver beaker.— 9. The res-
in accordance with the divine oracle, toration of the words following puiiiv
the Omphalus of the Earth, the colon- is uncertain.
node, the enclosing wall, the altar . . .
,
83. Regulations for sacrifices in the
a stone conduit, and the. . .above it; Asolepieum. For the frequent doublinghave had made in the oracle chamber a of consonants see 89.4, 101.2. Fortreasury, which can be locked, for the (pepdc-ei see 140.3 6. For other com-
offerings; have constructed all the road, ments see the Glossary.
TO lapov inrep yevea<;. iy\'[Koi]p,a0ei(Ta Be oyfriv elBe • iBoKet aiTei-
affai TOV 6ebv Kvrjaai K^^pav^, tov B' 'AaKXaTriov ^d/j,ev eyKVov
84. One of several stelae found in tic influence, e.g. usually el rarely al,
the Asolepieum recording the cures ef- contraction in Irri, ttoiijo-oCi'tos, etc. , ace.
fected. Cf. Paus.2.27.3(rT^Xai S^eio-TiJ- pi. d/cporeis etc. Lengthened 5 is al-
Keaav irrbs toO irepi/36\ou, ri iiiv apxaiov ways ou, and i usually a, but we findxvKoi irKioves, iir' ifwS dk ef XoiTral. rairais p6s beside x^pi^Si ^'^^ dip-^Xero (25 a, b).
iyyeypa/nfi^va Kai arSpwv Kal yvvaLK&y — 3. irevO' ?Tr| : see 58 c.— 5. Cf . Pans.
vavTe<s ToiSe. [There follow, 11. 32-96, the names of the arbitrators
and of those appointed to lay out the boundaries for them.]
referred to by Thuc.8.10.3 (correcting tity with tlie feminine form is shownIIeipai6i'toS7rIpaioi')andPliny,Nat.Hist. hj tas Alyiirripas 1.21 beside tov AtyiTi-
4.18 (Spiraeum).— 19. *d-yos: gen.sg. pas 1. 20.— 32ff. Tlie list of names,masc. in -as. 105.2 6. So 'Apalas 1. 22, arranged according to the three Doricbut also the usual form in KopvLdra 11. tribes, contains the characteristic forms13ff. The confusion caused by the iden- Q4Supos, eoKplv7is,etc. See 42.5 (i.
No. 95] RHODIAN INSCRIPTIONS 251
Rhodian
93. Camirus. YI cent. b.c. IG.XII.i.737. SGDI.4U0.
"Edfia t6^' '18a\fj,evev<; irolrjfra hiva KXeo'i I eirj 11
Zeii(8) fie viv oo-rt?|irrifiaivoi Xeio\\r) Oeir). 5
Helios and the nymph Rhodes, who as irdXios : the name given to the acrop-
was worshiped with divine honors by olis of lalysus. Cf. Ath.8.360 iv rg
the Rhodians. Cf. Diod.5.56, where 'laKmlf itb\iv la-xvpoTdT-nv ri/v 'Axolav
the name appears as 'HXexTpuiii/?).— KoKov/i^vriv.
7. \C6ou AapT(ou : also irirpas Aaprlas 97. Inscribed on the legs of one of
on another inscription, marble from the colossal statues at Abu-Symbel byLartus, a place iu the neighborhood of Greek mercenaries who had taken part
No. 99] EHODIAN INSCRIPTIONS 253
Ke/jKto? KaTwepde, vh 6 iroTanb<;\
avC-r). a(X)\oy\o{<T)(To<; 8'^'x.e
UoTaai/xirTO, AlyVTrTid<; Se "Afia<ri<;.||
eypa^e 8' afie "Apxov 'A/jioi- 5
^I'Xo Kal IleXepo? OvSa/io. b. 'E\effi'y8[to]9 o T^'to?.
c. T^Xe^o's /i' eypa^e ho 'IaXvo-to(?) -
<^. IIv^oi' 'A/i.ot/3t;Y[o].
e. na/3t? 6 2oXo<^oi/to? - - ctui^ ^Ojtt/^aT[t%ot].
/. Ha7eo-e/3/ito[?]. ^. nacrt(^)oi; 6 'Itttto -
A. KjOt^i? e'ypa((f>e)v.
i. ^Ofj,yvao^ hoica ^aai\e\v<; Tjekaae tov crrpaTOV [t]o irpaToh/
hdfjLJa '^a(/u.)/iaTt;;^o[t
98. Gela. VI cent. B.C. SGDI.4247.
JJacndSapo to|aafia, K/aare? iliroiei.
99. Agrigentum. Second half III cent. b.c. (before 210). IG.XIV.952.SGDI.4254. Michel 553.
'EttJ lepodvTa|
^vfi^oBwpov rov 4>iX(»i'o?|
Trapwrrpoa-rd^Ta) ra^
j8oi/Xa9, 1 irpoeSpevova-a'; ra? ^uXa?||
tcoi' 'TXXecdi', jrpoayopovvTO's|
5
in an expedition up the Nile under a 3. K^pKios : stands for the Egyp-
PsammetichusI (654-617 B.C. )orPsain- tian Kerti, which is applied to the
metichus 11 (594-589 e.g.), probably stretch of water between the first oat-
the latter. These mercenaries were aract and Elephantine.— vis 6 iroraiios
from Asia Minor and the adjacent dvtt|: as far as the river let them go up.
islands (cf. Hdt.2.154 tooti di'laxri nal For vh see 132.4.— 5. 'AiioipCx". O"-
ToTiriKap<rlToi(ri,a-vyKaTepyaaafi4voi,ffi ai- 8d|j.o: o 'A/juoi^ixov, 6 Ei)Sd/iou. 94.1,7.
Ti? 6 'iran/i.frixos SiSoil x'^po^^ ivoiKriaai. i. No complete restoration is possi-
aiirlovs a.\\-/i\bji/, olSi'IwvhreKalKS.- ble.— T]£\a(rE : ^Xoo-e aor. of Aaww.
pes Toiirous Tois x'^P""^ oUtiaav xpivov iwl The peculiar spelling H E is perhaps
iroXXii/. irpwroiyipovToiivAlyirTij) due to a confusion between the two
&\\6y\ta(riToi KaTO{.Kl<rd-t)<Tav). Among systems of writing known to those who
those whose names are inscribed be- wrote these inscriptions, 1) H = ?;, 2) Blow, there are two lonians, from Teos = A, and E = ij. Similarly BE/ii, i.e. iiixi,
and Colophon (6 and e), and one Rho- in a Theran inscription.
dian, from lalysus (c); / is also Doric, 98. Beginning of a hexameter. For
and h Ionic (on account of the v mova- THaaiaSafo see 105.2 a.
ble). The main part of the inscription 99. Proxeny decree of Agrigentum
(a), as well as i, is clearly in Doric in honor of Demetrius of Syracuse. In
and may well have been written by one view of 1. 11 and of the fact that this
of the Rhodian mercenaries, though inscription was found at Rome, being
there is nothing to prove this. evidently the copy given to Demetrius
(1. 24), it appears that he was resident after the analogy of ef\i7^o etc. (76 6),
in Rome, and his services probably con- occur in several koiu^ inscriptions.
—
sisted in some dealings vrith the Roman 15. yc76vciv: see 147.2..
senate in behalf of Agrigentum. loo. Rhegium was a Chalcidian col-
8. ci,\(a(r|i.a ktX. : decree of the &\la ony, and in the few early inscriptions
in the sixth period of two months, at the the Ionic element predominates. But
very end of the month Kapvehi.— 10. after its destruction by Dionysius of
o-u(v)KX.'<iTiiii. : the council, for which Syracuse in 387 b.c. and its subse-
/SouXd is employed in 1. 3. The signifl- quent restoration, there were contin-
cance of the following numeral is not ual changes in its population. Someclear. — 14. Trapeio-xfjcrSai : rfo-xijica, of its new inhabitants must have been
eUxvi^at, for ^ffxvKa, ^o-xw', 'with ei furnished by Gela or Agrigentum, if
5 Ovpoi yd<; I @eS)v 'M.arpi. I @eos ayaddi rluj^ai ayaOov Slai'/ioj/o?
dva-iaI
'Apx^vov • twi erlet run •7rpaTi(rT\coi dvcrovn /SoOli' Kal irv-
10 poi)V iyII
p,eSip,vov Kal|
KpiOav iy Svo p.\eSifivcov Kal ocvolv (jieTprjrdv
no. 105). Even at this early time f month Artemisius they shall offer a sac-
was completely lost, cf. KXeaySpaSj'Op- rifice, and at the Agoreia (name of a
ffoKXiji, Aeovrldas, i-rrole. festival) a banquet and sacrifices in
107. Agloteles, son of Enipantidas front of the image.
and Lacarto, was the first to honor with 109. 1 f . Boundaries of the land for,
a Carnean banquet the god {Apollo Car- the Mother of the Gods. This vfas,
neus) on the twentieth of the month in doubtless, land dedicated to her serv-
which the 'Ayopai were celebrated (of. ice by Archimus, who also promises
'Ayop'fimt no. 108). But the words from a sacrifice.— 6 ff. In the very first year
Tpino-Tos to Sciirm^eii are variously in- (as well as thereafter) they shall offer
terpreted. The inscription, up to the an ox, a medimnus of wheat, etc. —last two words, is metrical (two iambic evo-ovn : instead of evaiovri. (cf . no. 108),
trimeters), hence 5ci7r>'i|£>' without aug- but with retention of the Doric end-
ment and with the Att. -Ion. V movable. Ing, while <l>ipoviTiv\,\h is completely
For hlK&Si. see 68 c, 116. Attic, likewise 'kpreiuirlou (cf.'Apro/u-
108. On the twenty-fourth of the Tiouno.108).— Iy )u8C)i,vov. See 136.9,
No. 110] CEETAN IlsrSCEIPTIONS 261
Kal oKXa\
eTrdpynara Sv at (op\]fii ^epovaiv, fir]v6<; 'Aprelfuaiov 15
aet TO Be icpovo tov Bi[K]aa-T\dv oixvivTa xpivev. at B' awioiTo|
fi,e
dyev, TOV SiKacxTdv oiJi,vvvT\a Kp[^i'\vev, al lie diroTTOvloi fiaiTv;.|
at
15 Be Ka fioKei 6 fiev iXev0e[p]ov,||o B[e B]o\ov, icdpTOvav; ifiev
|
[ore-
jOo]t K iXevOepov diroTrovioi^TL. al Be k dvirl BoXdi fioXtovn|
irovi-
20 ovTe'! fov peKaTepo^; ep^ev, al p,ev Ka p.atru'i diroTrdvei, k^^tu tov
fiaiTvpa Bi/cdBBev, al|
Be k e dviroTepod diroirdvidvTt|
e fieBaTe-
poi/TOv Bt/caaTav (htvvvTa Kpivev. e Be Ka viKaffei 6|
ckov, [rjo/i
25 fiev iXevdepov Xa'^daat Tav Tre [i']t' dfiepav, tov Be So|X[oy] e? kS-
pav; aTToBofiev. al Be 1 Ka fie Xaydcrei e fie airoBoL, StKaKlcraTO
30 viKev TO fxev -iXevdepo I irevTeKOVTa aTaTepav; Kal a^^TaTepa ra?
days. But if he does not release him,
{the judge) shall condemn him to a fine
of a stater in the case of a free man, a
drachma in the case of a slave, for each
day until he releases him; and as to the
time, the judge shall decide under oath.
— For the use of the genitive in to
IXevffipo, TO SoXo, see 171. Similarly t5
irevreKovTcurTaTipo 11.38. Observe the
clear distinction in use, here and else-
where, between SiicdSSei'and Kpivev. The
former is used where the judge pro-
nounces formal judgment according to
the law and the evidence, the latter
where he acts directly as arbiter. Cf.
especially XI. 26 ff.— 11 fi. But if one
denies making a seizure, the judge shall
decide under oath, unless a witness tes-
tifies. If one party contends that a manis afree man, the other that he is a slave,
those who testify that he is a free manshall be preferred. If they contend about
a slave, each declaring that he is his, if
a witness testifies, (the judge) shall de-
clare judgment according to the witness,
but if they testify for both orfor neither,
thejudge shall decide under oath- When
the one in possession has been defeated,
he shall release the free man within five
days, and he shall surrender the slave.
If he does not release (the free man) or
surrender (the slave), (the judge) shall
decree that (the plaintiff) havejudgment
(viKiv = Att. viKav) against him, in the
case of the free man for fifty staters and
a stater, for each day until he releases
him, in the case of the slave ten staters
and a drachma for each day until he
surrenders him. But at the end of a year
after the judge has pronounced judg-
ment, one may exact three times tim
amount (i. e. three times the original
fines, instead of the accumulated fines
for delay) or less, but not more. As tothe
time thejudge shall decide under oath.—The purpose of this last provision seems
to be to prevent the accumulation of
fines out of all proportion to the value
of the slave. Some take rplrpa as a
third (i.e. of the accumulated fines).
The word occurs, in another Cretan
inscription (SGDI.5000 I), where its
meaning is equally disputed.— 25. tov
TtivT d)updv : gen. of time, 170,^
No. 110] CRETAN INSCEIPTIONS 263
afiepa<i /re«ao-T|a?, irpi'v ku Xaydaei, tS 8e 80 \o|
Se/ca c7TaTepav<;
KOI SapKvavI
ra? a/iepa? peKaa-ra';, Trplv k a\'irohoL e? Kepav<;. e Be
Ka /caTaStll/ca/eo-et o SiKacrrd^, iviavroi irlpaSSedeai rk rplrpa e 35
/ietov,I
ttXiov 8e /^e • to Se /epoVo toi^ StlKacrTai; ofivvvra Kplvev. al
heI
Ka vaevei 6 hdXo<; .0 Ka viKade\\i, kuXmv clvtI fiairvpov Bvov 40
S\po/xeov iXev6epov a7roSetA;craT|o eVt rSt j'aSt oVe «a meyet I alu-
T09 e a(X)Xos 7r/30 tovto at Se|
Ka fie KaXii e /xe SeUaei, KaTi-
a\\[TaT]o TO, e[ypa]{fj)fieva. al Se Ka fieS'|avrov uttoSol ev roi evi- 45
avroi,I
Tav<i airXoov; T[t]/x^i/9 eVt«aT|a(7Ta(7et. at Se k airoddvei
p\o\iotieva<; raS Si[Ka]<;, rav a7r\|[o'oi' Tifj,av KaTiaja-Tatrel. al Sje 50
Ka Koa-[p,]iov dyei. e Koa-fj,iovTo\'; aXXo'i, I k cnrocTTM, ixoXev, Ka'C K\a
viKadei, Karia-Tdfj^v air [a]?|
[a/uepa]? a7a7e rd iypa(/ji,)/jLeva.||
[toJi/ 65
Se veviKafjLevo[v] Ka[l tov Ka~\^\\TaKeip,evov djovri dirarov I efiev. 11
At Ka TOV eXevBepov e|
tuv eXevOepav Kdprei otirei, eKahov
(TTaTepav: KaTaaracrel a||t Se' k dtreTaCpo, Sexa • al Se k 6 SoXok 5
TOV eXevSepov e Tav eXev6epa\v, SiirXei KUTaa-Tuael al Se k e'X,e|v-
6epo<; poiKea e poiKeav, irevTe|
SapKvdvi • al Se xa f[oJtKeii? poiKea 11
35. IviavToi: notyearjhVLt anniversary. slave) of a member of the k6(tjj.os, the
See Glossary. •— 38 ff. If the slave on case shall be tried after he (the oflScial)
whose account one is defeated takes ref- has gone out of office, and, if defeated
uge in a temple, (the defeated party), he shall pay what is written from the
summoning {the successful party) in the time when he made the seizure. But
presence of two witnesses of age and there shall be no penalty for seizing one
free, shall point out {the slave) at the condemnedfor debt or one who has mort-
temple where he takes refuge, either him- gaged his person. —The penalties fixed
self or another for him; but if he does in 11. 47-50 and their relation to the
not make the summons or point him out, provision in 1. 36 are variously under-
he shall pay what is written. If he does stood. Many take tlhAvs and •nii.av as
not even (referring back to 11. 34 ft. ) sur- referring to the value of the slave.
render him {the slave) at the end of a II. 2-45. Rape and adultery.
year, he shall pay the simple fines in II.2 ff. If one commits rape upon a
addition (to what is stated in 11. 34 ff.). free man or woman, he shall pay one
If {the slave) dies while the suit is being hundred staters; but if upon {the son or
tried, he shall pay the simple fine (i.e. daughter) ofan d-iriraipos, ten. Thedir^-
wlthout any additional fines for delay). raipos, one who was not a member of
If a member of the k6<tiju>s (see Glossary) a iraipela. {iraipela) or society made up
makes a seizure, or (another {seizes the of citizens, occupied a social position
264 GEEEK DIALECTS [No. 110
10 I poiKeav, 7r[eV]Te crTaTepav<;.|
ivSoOiSiav SoXav al Kapret Safi\(i-
a-aiTO, Svo aTarepavi Kara<T\raa-ei al Se ica BeSafiv[a]fievav
15 7re|8' afiepav, [ojSeXoV, al Se k ev vvifrl, Sv 6Se\6v<; opKiorepav
S' el/jbev rav hoKav. at Ka rav i\\evdepav eTnirepeTai ottrev iiKi^ov-
20 TO'i KaSeara, Bbku o-rarll/aaj'? /caraa-Taa-et, al airotrdvio^i fiatTV<;.
at Ka rav iXevdepav|
iioikCov alXeOet, ev iraTpo'i e ev a^ekirio e ev
TO apSp6<!, eKarov 1 a-Tarepav; KaTacrTacrei ' al Be k i\v a(\)Xo,
25 TrevreicovTa • al Be Ka rav||
to aireTaipo, Bma al Be k o So\o9
Wah' eKevdepav, BiTrXel KaTaaTaad^ • al Be Ka SoXo? Bo\d, ireii^e.
30 irpofenrdro Be avrl /ji,atT\vpdv rpiov rots KaBea-Ta'i^ to evaiKe6evro<i
aWve6\9aL ev Tal<i irevT atiepai<; •\
to Be BoXo toi irdaTai avn|
35 fiaiTvpov Bvov. al Be Ka p\e aXXvcreTai,, eiri toI^ eX6i)^i efiev KpeO-
dai oTvai Ka XACovti. al Be Ka irovei BoXo'^a-aOOai, ofiocrai tov eX6\vTa
40 TO TrevreKOVTaaTarelpo Kal 7rXiovo<! irevTov aijirov plv avToi peKa-
arov eTrlapiofievov, to S' aireTaipo I Tplrov avTov, to Be /roi/ee|o? rov
45 Trdcrrav oLTepov avr^v fioiKiovT eXev, BoXoaa6\\6ai Be fie.
Ac K avep [/ca]^ [yi/JIvo; BiaKp\i'\vdv\T'\aL, rh pa a\vTat; eKev, aneKOva eie "Mp rov dvBpa, Kal to Kaptro t|Aw ifiivav, aX k ei e?
midway between the i\ei6epos and the him as they wish.— 36 fi. If one declares
foiKeds. Possibly the ^4voi. are meant.
—
that he has been the victim ofa plot, then
11 fi. If one violates a household slave the one who caught him shall swear, in
by force, he shall pay two staters, but a case involving afine offifty staters or
if one that has already been violated, by more, withfour others (literally himself
day one obol, but if in the night two as a fifth), each calling down curses
obols; and the slave shall have the pref- upon himself {if he test^es falsely), but
erence in the oath. — 16 fi. If one air- in the case of an i.ir4Taipos with two
tempts to have intercourse with a free others, in a case of a serf the master
woman to the distress of her relative, he and one other, that he took him in adul-
shall pay ten staters if a witness testi- tery and did not lay a plot,
flea.— 4irnripeToi: Teipdai.—aKEvovTOs: II.46-III.44. Rights of the wife in
&xeioi.— 28 fi. One shall announce be- the case of divorce or death of husband.
fore three witnesses to the relatives of 11.45 fi. If a man and wife are di-
the one caught (literally caught in, i.e. vorced, (the wife) shall have her ownin the house of the father etc.) that property with which she came to her
they are to ransom him withinfive days
;
husband, and the half of the produce, if
but to the master ofa slave before two wit- there is any from her own property, and
nesses. But if he is not ransomed, it shall the half ofwhatever she has woven within
be in the power of th? captors to do vjith {the house), whatever there is, and five
No. 110] CEETAK msCEIPTIONS 265
Tov /r^ji; avTa<i Kpe/xaTov, koti\
k evvwdvei rhv [kf,.lva\v dri\
k' It, goKal irevre a-Tarepavi, at k' 6 a\vep atrto? It rai ice[p]eva-t\o'; a[l]
Se irovioi avep [atriljo? fie S]fj,ep, tov Sikuitt^v|||6p.vwra Kpi'vev. 55
ai Sen a\X\o irepoi t5 avBpo^, TreWe (rT\aTipav; Karacnaael koti|
"^
Ka ire'pei avTov, koti ku -TrapWEXet uttoBoto avTov. ov Be k\
staters, if the husband is the cause of the ifilvav : see 1 1 . 1.— 50. koti : here anddivorce. But if the husband declares he III.26, 34 = rai on, i.e. itai ovrivos, gen.
is not the cause, the judge shall decide by attraction. — III. 14-15. Kpcios :
under oath. But if she carries off any- xpiJ"" from xp'^^o^, gen. sg. witli SwXer.
thing else belonging to the husband, she — 17 ff. If a man dies leaving children,
shall payfive staters, and whatever she if the wife wishes, she may marry again
carries off and whatever she purloins holding her own property and whatever
this she shall return. But as regards her husband may have given her, ac-
matters which she denies, {the judge) cording to what is written, in the pres-
shall decree thai she take the oath of en.ce of three witnesses of age and free,
denial by Artemis, {proceeding ?) to the But if she takes anything belonging to
Amycleium to the archer-goddess. If the children, it shall be a matterfor trial,
any one takes anything away from her — 27 ff. And of the produce in the
after she has taken the oath of denial, house she shall share with the lawful
he shall pay five staters and the thing heirs.— tov liriPa\\6vT5v : i i-n-L^AWov,
itself. If a stranger helps her carry the heir at law, a short expression for
things off, he shall pay ten staters Jt ^Ti;8d\X« (rd xpVa'ra) ; of. V.21-22
and half the amount which the judge o?s k ^7ri/3dXX«.— 37 ff. If man or wife
swears he helped carry o/.— 49. rdvv wishes to make gifts, (it is permitted),
266 GEEEK DIALECTS [No. 110
40 So>ei'1avep e ryvvd, I pSfia e 8wo8e/c|a araTepav; eSvoSeKci a-ra-j\\e-
pov /cpeo<;, irXiov Se fie. ai «|a /rotKeos fotKea KptOei BooJ
e airoda-
v6vro<;, ra fii avTa\; sKev aXKo 8' at n irepot, evS[iKop e/iev.
I
45 At reKOi rfvvh /i;||e[jo]e[i^o]z'o-a, iirekevaai roi a\v8pl iirl (rreyav
avTi iiaii\vpov rpiov. ai he fie SeKaai,\T0, eirl rat /larpl e/iev to
50 reiclvov e Tpdirev e airodefiev • opK^ioTeppB 8' e/iev to? KaBea-r\a,v;
Kal T0<; iialrvpavi, al|eTreXeva-av. al Be poiicea Te\tcoi Kcpevovaa,
55 eTteXeiKTai\
toi jrdcrTai to avBp6<s, o? c^vie, uvtI fiaiTvpov [Bv]ou.|j|
IV al Be tea fie BeKcreTai, eirl toi\irdaTai efiev rh tbkvov toi T|a? fOi-
5 /ce'a?. ai Be tol avTOi a^nv ottvioito irpb to iviaviWo, to irat,Biov
CTri roL irda-Tai|
e/jkev toi to poiKeoi. KopKio\Tepov efiev top iireXev-
10 a-avka Kal ro<; fJLalTvpav<;. iy\yvh, Kepeiiova ai cnro^dXot||
iraiBiov
irplv ewekeva-ai «a[T]|a; to, e'^pap.jMeva, eXevOepo ix\ev KaTaaTacrel
irevTeKOVTa I (XTaTepavi, BoXd irevTe KaX p\iKaTi, ai Ka vcicaOe. oi
15 Be Ka fxII
ei[e] Tt(9) cTTetya o-irvi eireXevcr^i, e avrov p-e opei, al (,ai)
a-}ro6\eie to iraiBiov, uttutov ep^ev.|al KvaaiTO Kal Texoi poiK\ea pe
20 o-TTViopeva, eirl toi T[d']||Trar/jo? irdaTai epev to T\eKVov • al B' 6
iraTep pe Boot,, iWrl rots top aBeXTTiov Trda^ai'i ep^v.
25 Ibv iraTepa top|
tckpop Kal top KpepaTOP i^apTepop ep,ev TaS
BaCaioiI
Kal Tap paTepa top pop aikra'i Kpep^aTOP. a? Ka Boopti, I
either clothing or twelve staters or some- — a-riyav : this is the regular word for
thing of the value of twelve staters, but house in this inscription, pomla being
not more.— K6(i,i<rTpa: perhaps a tech- household (V.26) and foiKos not oocur-
nical term for certain kinds of gifts. ring.—IV.14ff. If the man has no house
III. 44-1V. 23. Disposition of chil- to which she shall bring {the child), or she
dren horn after divorce. does not see him, if she exposes the child,
III.44 ff. If a divorced wife bears a there shall be no penalty.— oi 8^ Ka
child, she shall bring it to her husband |i.' Ali] ktX. : this conforms to the read-
at his house in the presence of three wit- ing of the stone, tliough the elision of
nesses. If he does not receive it, the child the e of /d is difficult (or read i^'i[e]
shall be in the power of the mother either with aphaeresis ?) . For /ca with the op-
to bring up or to expose; and tJie relatives tative see 177.
and witnesses shall have preference in IV.23-VI.2. Partition of property
the oaWi, as tg whether they brought it. ^mong chil4re^ an(i heirs-at-law,
No. 110] CEETAN INSCEIPTIONS 267
fie inrdvavKov ifiev Sar^eeai^- al h4 rt? aradeCe, hiro^dTraedaL 30
Toi arafievot a\i ejpaTTai. e Se k airoedvei 74(9), |crreyav; fj,ev
rav^ ev iroXi Ka|Tt k iv Tai(<;) a-rejaK evIi, a']? ku fj.e foiK€v<s evpoi-
Kec eV||t Kopai poiKiov, kuI to, irpo^aTa ku} «apTa[t']7roSa, a ku /xe 35
/rot/ee'os ei,|
eVt toi'; vid(n efiev, ra S' d\\\a Kpe/iara iravra BarSd-da\i Ka\o<s, Kal XavKuvev to? /iev
||vlvvi ottottoi k iovti Si5|o fioipavi 40
feKaa-Tov, raS B\e dvyarepav^ oiroTTai k Xov\ti fiCav /loipav fexd-a-rav. B\aT€0[0]at Be Kal to, fiaTp[o]ia, I
||k aTrodd[ve]i, anre[p] 45
TO, [waTpoi]I
e[yparT]ai. al Se Kpep,ara fie et|e, areya Se, XaxevraO 6[v]'yaTe\pa<; ai eyparrai. al Be ica Xl|t o irarep Boo<i lov Bofiev
Ta\\i oTTViofievai, Boto kuto. r\a iypafifieva, irXiova Be fie.|oreiai Be 50
TrpoOO' eBoKe e imaltrevae, ravr eKev, dWa Be fie|||
avo\av[Kd]- Vvev. yvvd 6[r]eia K\pefiaTa fie exei e [iralrpoB Bo]vto'; e a[8]e\7ri5
e iina--7rev\a-avT0<; e diro\a[K]6va-a a\\i ok 6 Al6[a]\ev(<i) arapTh 5
eKoa-\filov ol a-iiv Kv[X]Xot, TavT\fi<: fiev diroXavKdvev, Tat|S Be irpoOOa
fie e\y'\BiKov efj.\ev.
E K d'rr\o'\ddvei dvep e yvi}^d, al fiev k ei reKva e e? TelKVOv 10
TeKva e e? tovtov re^Kva, touto? e«e[z'] rd Kpefia\Ta. al Be ku fieri';
ei TOVTOV, d^ayBeX-jTiol Be to d7roOav6v\\TO<; «€«? dBe\X]inov reKvla 15
e 69 rovrov reKva, tout|o9 eKev rd Kpefiara. al Be Ka I fieri<; ei tov-
tov, dBevTTial B\e to diroOavovTO'i /ce? Tavi'^dv reKva e e? rov Trnvov 20
re^Kva, tovto<; exev rd Kpefialra. al Be Ka fieTi<; ei tovtov, I oh
K iirifidXXei otto k ei to KpkfiaTa, tovto9 dvaLXe06alk. al Be fie 25
IV.29ff. But if any one {of the chil- when Cyllus and his colleagues of the
dren) should be conde)nned to pay afine, trrapTb^ {subdivision of the tribe) of the
the one who has beenfined shall have Ms Aethalians composed the Kdaiios, these
portion taken out and given him as is women shall share in the inheritance,
written.— 33 ff. als Ka kt\. . which are but against those {who received gifts)
not occupied by a serf residing in the previously no action shall be brought.—country.— 44 ff. And the property of 22 ff. If there is none of these, those to
the mother shall be divided, when she whom it falls according to the source of
dies, in the same way as is prescribed the property shall receive it. But if
for the property of the father. — V.l ff. there are no heirs-at-law, those of the
Whatever woman has no property either household who compose the /cXopos (i.e.
Ml gift offather or brother or by prom- the body of KKapurai or serfs attached
we or by inheritance, as (wcw written) to the estate) shall have th^e money. —-
268 GEEEK DIALECTS [No. 110
elev eTrt/SaWoi'Tels, rd'i poiKiai; oonve^ k|
lovn 6 KXapo<s, tovtovi;
e]Kev TO, Kpefiara.
30 Ai Se K olI
eTTt/SaWoj/re? ol fiev \eC^VTi Sareddai to. Kpefiaija,
ol Se p,e, SiKUKo-ai rov hi\KaaTav eirl rolX Xeioveri B\aTe60ai efiev
35 TO, KpifiUTU jr\dvTa, irpCv Ka hdrrovrai.||ai Be xa SiKdKa-avro<s to
SltKacTTO Kaprei ivcreiei e d\r/ei e Trepei, BeKa aTaTepa,v\<; KaTaara-
40 erel koX to Kpe\io<; hiTrXel. tvutov Se Kal icafJiliro ical fefiw; Kaviri-
Se/j,a<! KleTriTToXaiov KpefiuTOV, a'l Ka file Xeiovn SaTe^ffdai — tov
45 SltKao-rJai' ojAvvvTa Kplva\i -iropTl tA fioXiofieva. [a]t [S]||e Ka Kpe-
fjLaTa SaTiop,evoi I fie' avvji.jvoa'KovTi, avhrl Tav Saiiriv, ovev to, Kpe-
Tav iTra^o\\,dv feKacTTO'i. haTiop,e\voLh Se Kpep,aTa p,aiTVpa\v'i ira-
Ylpejiev Spopeav<; eXe\v6e'pov's Tpuv<; e irXtavi.|||OvyaTpl e BiSoi, KaTO,
Th ai\Td.
''A<; K 6 iraTeS Soei, tov to Trlar/jos KpefidTov irap vieo<s 1 p,e
5 ove66ai /tteSe KaTadC&kOdai • oltl Se k avT0<; •jrdo'ei\ai, e diroXaKei
inroSiSoddo, I a'i Ka Xei. peSe tov iraTepa to, Tmv tbkvov cltl k av-
id Tol Trderov^Tai e diroXdKovTi. peSe to, rlla? jvvaiKO'; tov dySpa
airo^6{d)6ai peS' eTnairevcrai, peS'|
vlvv to, Td<; paTpo';. ai S\e ti<s
15 irplaiTO e KUTadeiTO e i^irunrevaaiTo, dXXai S' e7j0aT||[Ta]t, ai TdSe
28ff. If some of the heirs-atr-lawwish to oftheprice.— 34. SAttovtoi: aor.subj.,
divide the property, and others not, the of. d,iroSiTTaSeai. 82. — 36. ivmdi
:
judge shall decree that all the property taken by some as fv-a-elei (o-eiai), but
belong to those wishing to divide, uniil more probably iva-eiei (ef/«) with a in-
they divide it. If any one, after the de- stead of i from the indicative.— 39.
cision of the judge, enters in by force or tvotSv: BvqT&v = ^ifuv, as In Hdt.2.
drives or carries off anything, he shall 68.— VI.l. SiSoi : subj. without Ka.
pay ten staters and double the value of 174.
the object. In the matter of live stock, VI.2-46. Sale and mortgage of fam-
produce, clothing, ornaments, and fur- ily property.
niture, if they do not wish to make a VI.2 ff. As long as the father lives,
division, the judge shall decide with ref- one shall not purchase any of the fa-erence to the pleadings. If, when divid- therms property from the son, nor take a
ing the property, they do not agree as to mortgage on it. But whatever {the son)
the division, they shall sell the property, himself has acquired or inherited, he
and, disposing of it to whoever offers the may dispose of, if he wishes. — 14 f.
most, they shall receive each his share dWai 8' eYparrai ; and it is written
No. 110] CEETAN INSCRIPTIONS 269
T^ ypdf^fMaTa mparrai, T<i] fi[e]v^icpefiara eVl rat p,arpl lp\ev
Keirl rai yvvai/ci, 6 B' aTro\S6p,€VO'; e /caradevi I eVt||o-7reWai'9 rot 20
trpiaiMevdi|
e KaTade/Mevot I e'!na-!rev\craixevdL SiirXei KaTaaTa\a-ec
KM Tt' K aW dra<: ei, to a7r|Xo'oi/ • tov Se TrpoOda fj,e ei\\SiKov i/xev. 23
at Se K 6 dvTi/j,\o\o<; aTro/ioXit dvirl to «;/3|eo9 01 k avTrifioXiovTi fAe
ifiev Ta? /ttaT[|0]o? I Ta|? jwaiKO^, fiokev orre k eij^i^dXkei, Trap 30
Toi ScKaa-TMI
e pmdaTO eypaTTM. al Se k a\n-o6dvei p,dTep TeKvaKaTa\nr6\vaa, tov iraTepa KapTepbv efiev
|
tSv jxaTpoiov, dwoSd(6)dai
Se jxeII
iieSe KaTadep,ev, al ku fie tA TeK\va eiraiveaei Spop,ee<s iov- 35
re?.I
\a\l Se tk dWdi irpiaiTO e KaTa\6elTo, to. p,ev xpefiuTa iirl
TOt|? TeKVOK e/iev, toi Se irpiap\\evoi e KaTaffefievoi, tov d'7roS\6iu.evov 40
e TOV KaTadevTa tclv|
Si-rrXeiav KaTaa-Tdaai to,:; T|i/ia?, «at ti
K aW UTa^ ei, to d\7r\6ov. al Se k dXXav oirvCei, to, TJ|eKZ/a [t5]i' 45
[fjL^aTpoiov KapTepbvk efiev.
At K eS Sv(r[fj,eviav<;] 7re|/3a[0et «]eK? dXXo7ro\ia<; -vir' dv\dvKa<;
iK6p.evo<! Ke\o[fj,']evd ti\^ XvcreTai, eir\ tSi aXXi/o-ayneVHot ep,ev, irpiv 50
K diroSoi TO eTri^d\\Xov. ai Se ica p,e op,o\o'^iovT\i apmX Tav TrXe-
- dvv e fie [K']e\o/j,e\[v'\o avTO [X]vaad0ai, tov SiKaa-lTav ofivvvTa
Kieckers, Die lokalen Verschiedenheiten im Dialekte Kretas. Marburg
1908.
NOTES AND EEFEEENCES 287
Pamphylian
Bezzenberger, Zur Beurteilung des pamphylischen Dialekts, Bz.B.V,325ff.Kretschmer, Zum pamphylischen Dialekt, K.Z.XXXIII,258ff.Meister, Die Inschrift von
. Sillyon und der pamphylisehe Dialekt, BerSachs.Ges. 1904, Iff.
Meillet, La place du pamphylien parmi les dialectes greos, Rev.:6t.Gr.XXI,413ff.
NOTES AND EEFEEENCES i
1. Interrelation of the dialects. Ahrensl,lfi. CoUitz, Die Verwandt-schaftsverhaltnisse der griechischen Dialekte mit besonderer Rucksicht aufdie thessalische Mundart,18S5. Smyth,The Dialects of North Greece,Am.J.Phil.VII,421 ff. , 1887. Hoffmann, De mixtis Graecae linguae dialectis, 1888.
HofimannI,lfE., 1891. Solmsen, Thessaliotis und Pelasgiotis,Rh.M.LVIII,
598 ff., 1903. Id., Eigennamen als Zeugen der Stammesmischung in Boeo-tien, Rh.M.LIX,481ff.,1901. Meister, Dorer und Achaerl, 1904. Thumb,Dialektforschung und Stammesgeschichte, Neue Jb. 1905,385fE. Buck,The Interrelations of the Greek Dialects, Class. Phil. II, 241 ff., 1907.
Kretschmer, Zur Geschiohte der griechischen Dialekte, Glottal,4ff.,1907.
Cf. also the brief statements in the histories of Busolt, 1^,1923.; E.
68. Brugmann, Gr.Gr.ll2fE., with literature cited.
68.2. In calling the y of yi<f>vpa unexplained I had overlooked for the
moment the probable explanation that it is due to dissimilation from the
<^. So also Dor. yXenia (Alcman), yXi<fm.pov (Alcman, Pindar, etc.) = pkarm,
pXitjyapov. Cf. Solmsen, Ueber dissimilations- und assimilationserschei-
nungen bei den altgriechischen gutturalen, 5 ; Mansion, Les gutturales
grecques, 60..
68.4 a. Savxva is now attested for Cyprian also. Cf. Aat)x*«<^op'o, Mei-
ster, Ber.Sachs.Ges. 1908,2 ff.
. 69.3. Sohulze,K.Z.XXXIII,318ff. Kretschmer, K.Z.XXXV,608.69.4. Like eTnrao-is is d7nra<7a/*Evos, from *di'-7r7ra-, in the new fragments
of Corinna.
71a. Brugmann, Gr.Gr.80. Jacobsohn, K.Z.XLII,274.
72. Solmsen, A.M. 1906, 347 ff.; Beitrage zur griechischen Wortfor-
schungl,10aff.
73 ff. On relics of Aeolic w etc. in Chios and other once Aeolic, later
Ionic, territory in Asia Minor, see 184 a ; at Eleusis ('I/i/xdpaSos), Solmsen,
Eh.M.LVIII,623; in Macedonian, Solmsen, I. F.VII, 48, Hoffmann, Die
Makedonen,125ff.
76. On the difficult question whether in the intermediate stage of the
development of o-ju. etc. o- became z or A, cf . Sommer, Griech. Lautstudien,
25 ff. and the literature cited.
NOTES AND EEFEEENCES 293
77.2. vcr + consonant may arise in new formations and undergo the samedevelopment as secondary intervocalic vcr. Cf. Lesb. eiKoioros, 116a, and
Corcyr. eicXoyi^ow^o), 140.32).
77.8. avTJKourav etc. in a late inscription of Cyrene I suspect of being
an ai-tificial, not an inherited, Aeolism. Cf.Class.Phil.il. 272.
80. For pp, especially in Boeotian, cf. Solmsen,Rh.^I.LIX,486ff. But
in just what dialects, besides Attic, West Ionic, Arcadian, Elean, and
Theran, pp is to be recognized as normal, cannot be determined with any
certainty from the existing evidence. In some dialects where we find a few
examples both of pp and of per, or even of pa- only, the latter may be so
late as to be easily attributable to koivi; influence. But it is also possible
that in some dialects pp was only an occasional colloquialism and that ptr
was preserved, even without external influence, in careful speech. Cf. 86,
p. 68. The isolated Kapputv (also in Tim. Locr. and Plut. Instit. Lac.) is
especially significant. But we do not ffeel warranted as yet in assuming
that pp was common to the West Greek dialects in general.
81. For T = o-o- in Ionic, cf. 4.4.
81a. On late Cretan 6aXa66a etc., cf. Thumb,Neue Jb. 1905,391; Mei-
ster, Dorer und AchaerI,6Sff. But against the latter's understanding of
eypaTTtre of the Law-Code as fypairo-e = iypd(f>6ri, cf . Jacobsthal,I.F.XXI,
Beiheft,18ff.
81 6. Schulze, Gott.Gel.Anz. 1897,900 ff.
82. Lagercrantz, Zur griech. Lautgeschichte,19ff. For era- add Coan
ocToxK, Calymn. BiKacrcrio).
84. On the question of Megarian 88 or ^, cf. Lagercrantz, Zur griech.
Lautgeschichte, 27. Meister, Dorer und Achaer 1, 160. Earlier inscrip-
tional evidence is needed to settle the matter.
The Rhodian vase with the inscription containing AerJs is now published
by T. L. Spear in Am. J.Phil.XXIX,461fE. There seems to be no reason to
doubt its Rhodian provenance.
84 a. Note also Boeot. <f>pd.TTO) (Coriima) = </>pa^<i).
85.1. Buck,Class.Phil.n,266, with literature cited.
86 and 96. Mucke, De consonarum in Graeca lingua praeter Asiati-
corum dialectum Aeolicam geminatione.
87. On 8aKn)Xos, cf. Brugmann,I.F.XI,284ff.
88. Kretschmer,K.Z.XXXIII,603fE. •
89.1. G.Meyer, 304f. A sixth-century inscription of Ephesus (Hogarth,
Excavations at Ephesus, 122 ff.) shows a doubling of dentals after a conso-
nant, e.g. oKTTw, iKTTTj, qveif^Shjaav, and, in sentence combination, Ik tto,
294 GREEK DIALECTS
89.3. Solmsen, Untersuchungen zur grieoh. Laut- und Verslehre, 165fE.
89.5. Brugmami,GrundrissII.i,44:ff., with literature cited.
91. Allen, Greek Versification in Inscriptions, 126 ff.
94. Lucius, De crasi et aphaeresi, Diss.Arg.IX,351ff. Kuhner-Blass I,
218fE. Meister,Herodas,778fE.
94.1. The type of crasis seen in TOLpumpov, that is really elision as we
believe, is the usual one in Argolic. Another instance is seen in IIoXvjtiiSEs
iiroUt Aapyeios (o 'Apyeios), B.C.H.XXIV,448. Epid. Tal<TK)unnet (rfit At(r-)
is disputed, cf. IG.IV.1203. Of. also Rhod. 'A/xoi/Sixo (6 'Ap.-), no. 97;
Arc. TaTToXXiovi (rot 'Air-), 'E<^.'Apx-1903,178.
94.6. See above, p. 290.
94.7. end. In view of the frequent elision in Argolic (above, note to
94.1), Aegin. hoiKos is more probable than hoiKa!^.
95. Giinther, Die Prapositionen in den griechischen Dialektinschriften,
LF.XX,37ff. Solmsen, Rh.M.LXII,329fE. Kretschmer, Die Apokope in
den griechischen Dialekten, Glotta 1,34 ff.
Trip before vowels, as in Delph. irepoSos, occurs also in Thess. xep Upauv,
no. 28.40, Cypr. wep' 'ESdXiov, no. 19.27, in Boeot. Tfcpayrji = irtpvayrj^, in the
new Gorinna fragments, and in the Locrian or Aetolian ethnicon TLipoyOeK
A.M.XXXIII,30.
With Thess. air, vtt, cf. a.inrfp,\f/a and i^^dXXav, once each in Homer.
102. Sommer, Zum inschriftliohen vv ecjieXKvcrTiKov, Festschrift zur 49.
Versammlung deutscher Philologen und Schulmanner, Basel 1907.
105.1a, 25. Solmsen, Rh.M.LIX,494ff.
106.1a. Thess. -oi from -010, Ahrens 1,222; HofemannII,533; J.Schmidt,
K.Z.XXXVIII,29ff. ; as original locative, Brugmann,Gr.Gr.225; as origi-
nal genitive in -ot and cognate with Lat. -l, etc., Kretschmer, GlottaI,57ff.
I am convinced of the correctness of the first-named view, as preferred in
the text. -010 occurs IG.IX.ii.458, 459,511, 1036.
On Cypr. -5v, E.Iiermann,I.F.XX,354fE., but the explanation is not
convincing to me.
106.2. On distribution of -ot, Buok,Class.Phil.II,266.
107.1. Keil,G6tt.Nachr.l899,151ff.
107.3. On -eo-o-t, Buck, Class. Rev.XIX,249fE.; Class.Phil.II,273fE. On-ots (cf . also 226, 279), G. Meyer 475, and most recently Sommer, I.F.XXV,289 ff.
107.4. Buck,Class.Phil.II,266fE., with literature cited.'
Cret. OvycLTcpavs etc. It is of course not accidental that the analogical
introduction of -avs beside -as (fluyarepas also occurs) is found in just that
dialect in ?yhich the ^-sterns show by-forms in -avs and -os (104.8).
NOTES AND EEFEEENCES 295
108.2. On the question of Thess.'lTnroKpaTtis etc. , cf . Hoffmann, Philolo-
gus.LXI,2-i5,LXII,15.")ff.; Bechtel, Hermes XXXVII,631ff.Boeot. Meyva etc. (full material in Sad(5e,DeBoeot. tit.dial.,50fl.) are
generally taken as T-stem forms, either vocatives or nominatives without s.
Cf. Kretschmer.K.Z.XXXVI, 26Sff.; Meister,Ber.Sachs.Ges.l904,32. But
as forms in -r/ are not found in the dialects which keep the T-inflection,
^Yhile vocatives in -r; from cr-stems are known and Boeotian shows the ct-
inflection in other case-forms, we prefer to- assume that these forms too
belong to the adopted cr-stem type. Still different views, but too general
and vague to carry conviction, are expressed by Sad^e I.e., and Solmsen,
Berl.Phil.Woch.l906,lSl.
H1.4. -ijs is probably not from -lyvs, like jSois beside /SoSs from *;8a)vs
(37.1), but owes its -q to the analogy of -t^os etc. Dat. pi. MavTii/ecri in an
Elean decree (SGDI.1151.17) shows a similar extension of r] at the expense
of ev, and is perhaps the Arcadian, rather than a true Elean, form.
169-178. Among the few special studies of dialectic syntax, beside those
on the use of prepositions already cited (p. 296), may be mentioned r K.
Meister, Der syntaktische Gebrauch des Genetivs in den kretischen Dialekt-
inschriften, I.F.XYIII, 133 ff.; Riittgers, De accusativi, genetivi, aocusativi
usu in inscriptionibus archaicis Cretensibus, Bonn 1905 ; Jacobsthal, Der
Gebrauch der Tempora und Modi in dea kretischen Dialektinscbriften,I.F,
298 GEEEK DIALECTS
XXI,Beiheft ; Edith Frances Claplin, The Syntax of the Boeotian Dialect
(Bryn Mawr dissertation).
174. Jacobsthal, I.e., 87fE., whose Arcadian examples, however, should
be replaced by those given in our text.
176. Jacobsthal, I.C., 93 ff.
177. Jacobsthal, I.e., 90 ff.
178. Jacobsthal,l.c.,83fE.
179. Buck,Class.Phil.n,258ff., with literature cited. Jacobsthal, I.F.
XXI,Beiheft,143£E. Jacobsohn, K.Z.XLII,153.
182. Among the important Ionic characteristics should have been men-
tioned: Contraction of or; to m. 44.2.
274-280. Thumb, Die griechische Sprache im Zeitalter des Hellenis-
mus. Buck, The General Linguistic Conditions in Ancient Italy and Greece,
Class. Journ. 1,99 ff.i Wahrmann, Prolegomena zu einer Geschichte der
griechischen Dialekte im Zeitalter des Hellenismus.
279. More commonly known as the Achaean-Doric kolv^, after Meister
11,81 ff. See Buck, The Source of the so-called Achaean-Doric KOLvrj, A.J.
Ph.XXI,193ff.
1 The portion of this article which deals with Greece, and also the statements
in the text, are condensed from a more comprehensive but unpublished study of
this subject. ^
GLOSSARY AND INDEX
In the alphabetical arrangement the presence of p is ignored, in order toobviate the separation of the many forms which occur with and without it. Thus(f)CKaTi, i.e. plKaTL or [Kan, stands in the position of tKari, and vo(f)6s in theposition of vads. f stands in the position of k.
For inflectional forms the conventional captions (nom. sg., 1 sg. pres. indie.)
are sometimes substituted, and in these the transcription which we have em-ployed for forms occurring in the epichoric alphabets is frequently replaced bythe more familiar spelling, e.g. e, o. A, by ij, w, ', or Cret. tt, k, by 0, x- But theprecise form occurring is sometimes retained as a caption, or added, or givenseparately witli a cross-reference. Brevity and convenience in each case havebeen preferred to consistency.
The references are : numbers in Clarendon type, to the sections of the Gram-mar, or, where App. is added, to the corresponding sections of the Appendix;otherwise, to the numbers of the inscriptions. The Heraclean Tables (no. 74)
and the Cretan Law-Code (no. 110) are cited by name.
a = a. 68 aapdrarai Lac. S3dpAios Cret. = 7i\u>s. 41.3dpX.oir(a Cret. = d/3Xa/3£a. 5
dYaios Delph., admirable, wonderful
(?). Cf. Etyioa. Mag. iyalos- iirl(j>eo-
vov 71 eavimarbv. No. 51D38, note
a7(iX|ia = aviB-niia. No. 35, note
a7aX|i.aTa(|K&p El. = icpiirwXos. 107.1,
no. 60.13, note
oLYappis West Ion., assembly. 5, 49.2,
80 with a'AyatrikiFO Eub. = 'AyiurC\ea. 41 .4, 53
d-yi^ai Cret., bands in which the Cre-
tan youth were trained
d7E\doi, Cret., ephebi, members of the
ayfKai. 31, no. 113.11, note
a-yepiris East Ion., assembly. 49.2
'AyXaa-, 'A^Xw-. 41.2
&yvia = iyo). 162.6. dxi^f^ros, 66'A-yoXcws Meg. = 'AyfKaos. 167
Ss = ?ai!. 41.4, 46.4, 132.9aa(ravT6s reflex, pron. 121.4'AirKa\airi6s Thess. = 'A.(TKKT)vtb's. 48dirKi)6^s Arc. , used of animals without
blemish
a(ir)o'urTa El. , Lac. = tfyx"'"''''- 113.3.Lac. Toi 's S,((r)irurTa TriffiKcs, El. rolp
4ir' S,(<r)(rtiTTa, those next of kin. Cf.
Cret. ol iir &pxtffra (or ^ir^pxtcrra)
Treirap.ivoi. the nearest owners, Locr.• iirivxi-(rT05 next of kinAa-r&s Epid. = dma-rds. 77.2FOOTTds = da-rSs. 62ara Cret., penalty, fine. 63draYCa Thess., time when there is no
PaBoEu Lesb. = /SotjS^m. 44.2Povd Boeot. = yvv^. 68.1pdpvapiai =: p,dpvaiiai. 88Pao-iXdES El. = paaiKrjes. 16PatriXEvs, ofScial title in many states.
In some the chief magistrate ; in
others restricted to religious func-tions, like the tLpxav /Soo-iXeiis at Ath-ens, e.g. at Chios (no. 4C) and Mile-tus; /Sao-iXefs an Official body, e.g. in
cKTcio-is, not ^KTio-is. 28 a Tvith App.S\a|U = i\Aui, iXaiva. 162.4SXcJj = elTre. So regularly in Boeotianand Thessalian decrees, where Atticand most dialects have elne. Some-times also in decrees of Oropus
bring. 162.9lirE|Mrdiii El. {lirevirot, lirevTrira) enforce
or declare. Also iinroi. from simplexi/jiirdui. Probably related to i/j-ird^u
inh Arc ., just for. 136.10lirecTTdKOVTa Thess. = iipcffrr/Kdra. 58
6
147.36ir€Tov Dor. etc. = ^weffov, aor. of ttIwtw.
See no. 74.120, notelir«xct Delph. = i<pe^TJs. 132.2«Tr£ El. = iTel
ETTTipcid^o) = iTTjped^w. This spellingwith 61, as in no. 18.46 and also in pa-pyri (irnpeidaavTos, Berlin Aeg.Urk.II. 589.9), is the etymological one (cf
.
iiriipeia), while ivripcdl^oi of our textsis like dwped beside dwpad (31)
brl Boeot. = Iwet. 29(Tsmja Cypr. = ^TTca. 9.3lirtapov El. = *i((>Upov sacred penaltyhnwrh (Viar^s) Locr., for the year.