bTheMedia - documentation

8  de  junio  de  2011    

2011,  the  year  we  took  the  media  

free  and    open  licenses  

1.  intro:  s.XV  –  s.XXI  2.  intellectual  property  vs.  information  control  3.  2011:  with  the  15M  and  Occupy  Movements  

a  BIG  change  came…  4.  free  and  open  licenses  5.  some  use  examples  6.  a  last  thought…  

3  

Johannes  Gutenberg    (c.1368  –  1450)  

4  

5  

RFCs  Requests  For  Comments  (Internet  Engenieering  Task  Force)    WWW  (Tim  Berners-­‐Lee  /    Robert  Cailliau)    

6  

There  is  a  FALSE  \ight  for  the  intellectual  property,    

it’s  all  about    the    control  of  information  

7  

8  

Sinde-­‐Wert  Law  ACTA  SOPA  PIPA  Hadopi  Lleras  Law  

IT’s  WAR!  

9  

whatever  Law…  

Ley  Sinde-­‐Wert  ACTA  SOPA  PIPA  Hadopi  Lleras  Law  

IT’s  WAR!  

10  

Leys    ss  r  Law…  

11  

Some  examples  on  how    IP  Laws  are  been  used    for  –NON  IP–  purposes  

12  

13  

Use  of  Technologies    of  Information  and  

Telecommunications  in  the  15M  and  Occupy  movements  

14  

15  

‘15M:  Excelente.  Revulsivo.  Importante’    “we  are  the  media”  (7’)  

16  

17  

18  

19  

20  

21  

22  

23  

24  

copyleft  +  documentation  

25  

Licence  “The verb license or grant license means to give permission. The noun license or licence refers to that permission as well as to the document recording that permission. A license may be granted by a party ("licensor") to another party ("licensee") as an element of an agreement between those parties. A shorthand definition of a license is "an authorization (by the licensor) to use the licensed material (by the licensee).” […] A licensor may grant a license under intellectual property laws to authorize a use (such as copying software or using a (patented) invention) to a licensee, sparing the licensee from a claim of infringement brought by the licensor. A license under intellectual property commonly has several components beyond the grant itself, including a term, territory, renewal provisions, and other limitations”  

26  

TO  LICENSE  ≠  TO  REGISTER  

The  registration  of  a  work  provides  protection    of  intellectual  property  rights,  giving  legal  notice    

of  the  existence  of  the  registered  rights    to  a  concrete  author  and  date.  

the  citizen‘X’    registered  on  his  name  the  work‘Y’  

in  the  date  and  hour‘Z’  

27  

ORIGIN  OF  FREE  LICENCES:  

SOFTWARE  

28  

Richard  Matthew  Stallman  (RMS),  Free  Software  Foundation    

FOTOS:  Wikimedia  Foundation    

29  

30  

First  formal  de5inition  of  FREE  SOFTWARE    (Richard  Stalman,  Free  Software  Foundation,  1986)  

 Freedom  0:  The  freedom  to  run  the  program  for  any  purpose.  

Freedom  1:  The  freedom  to  study  how  the  program  works,  and  change  it                                                                        to  make  it  do  what  you  wish.  

Freedom  2:  The  freedom  to    redistribute  copies    so  you  can  help                                                      your  neighbor.  

Freedom  3:  The  freedom  to  improve  the  program,  and  release  your                                                      improvements  (and  modi5ied  versions  in  general)  to  the                                                        public,  so  that  the  whole  community  bene5its.  

FUENTE:  FSF  

31  

from  FREE  SOFTWARE            

to  FREE  CULTURE  

32  

33  

Lawrence  Lessig,  Harvard  University,  Creative  Commons    

FOTOS:  Wikimedia  Foundation    

34  

from  FREE  SOFTWARE          

to  FREE  CULTURE      

…and  n  2011  we  has  a  new  evolution  and  came  to    

“FREE  POLITICS”*  

*  but  this  is  another  story…  

35  

Some  characteristics  of  Creative  Commons  Licences      

•  Free  use  (free  as  in  beer  and  as  in  freedom)  •  Don´t  need  to  be  deposited  or  registered  •  For  global  use  (UNPORTED)  or  territorial  (ES  for  Spain)  •  Only  affect  patrimonial  rights.  They  don´t  touch  moral  rights.    CC  licenses  and  are  valid  until  the  work  passes  to  public  domain.  

•  Not  recommended  for  software  (see:  fsf.org)  

36  

37  

38  

39  

40  

The  three  layers  of  Creative  Commons  licences  

41  

Chosing  a  license:   chosen  license,  logo  +  code  

MACHINE    

readable  

42  

Chosing  a  license:   human  language  

HUMAN  

readable  

43  

Chosing  a  license:   full  legal  text  

LEGAL  

code  

44  

Case  Study:  ¿Who  is  using  Creative    Commons  licenses?  

Case  Study:  ¿Who  is  using  Creative  Commons?  

45  Case  Study:  ¿Who  is  using  Creative  Commons?  

46  Case  Study:  ¿Who  is  using  Creative  Commons?  

47  Case  Study:  ¿Who  is  using  Creative  Commons?  

48  Case  Study:  ¿Who  is  using  Creative  Commons?  

49  Case  Study:  ¿Who  is  using  Creative  Commons?  

50  Case  Study:  ¿Who  is  using  Creative  Commons?  

51  Case  Study:  ¿Who  is  using  Creative  Commons?  

52  Case  Study:  ¿Who  is  using  Creative  Commons?  

53  Case  Study:  ¿Who  is  using  Creative  Commons?  

54  Case  Study:  ¿Who  is  using  Creative  Commons?  

55  Case  Study:  ¿Who  is  using  Creative  Commons?  

56  Case  Study:  ¿Who  is  using  Creative  Commons?  

57  Case  Study:  ¿Who  is  using  Creative  Commons?  

58  Case  Study:  ¿Who  is  using  Creative  Commons?  

59  Case  Study:  ¿Who  is  using  Creative  Commons?  

A  last  thought  about  the  importance  of  having  our    own  free  technologies    wordpress  (self  hosted),  identi.ca,  N-­‐1,…    streaming      watch  out  for  the  ‘standarts’…!  be  awake  in  the  next  future!  <-­‐  this  is  our  next  big  \ight!!    

60  

web:    www.steph.es    twitter:    @fanetin    

licencia  de  la  presentación:    fotos,  grá`icos  y  capturas  de  pantalla:  ©  de  sus  autores  

thank  you!  

http://acorta.net/bthemedia