8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
1/38
Land Law
Lecture 3
NOOR AISYAH ASYIKIN
fspu uitm shah alam
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
2/38
The Torrens System
When the Torrens system was first introduced in theFederated Malay States, there was already thenprevailing a system of land law based on Malay custom
and Islamic law.
This has recently been affirmed by the Supreme Court ofMalaysia in the case of Tengku Jaafar & Anor. v. The
State of Pahang (1987)
in which the Lord President heldthat the land law in Pahang before the introduction of theTorrens system was Islamic law of the Shafii School.
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
3/38
The Torrens System
In the early stages of the introduction of the Torrenssystem, the General Land Regulations were enacted in allthe four states, Perak in 1879, Selangor in 1882, Negeri
Sembilan in 1887 and Pahang in 1888. This was soonfollowed by the Registration of Titles Regulations inSelangor (1891), Perak and Pahang (1897) and NegeriSembilan (1898), and the Land Enactments of 1897,
enacted in all the four sates.
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
4/38
The Torrens System
By 1911, these several and separate State legislationsfinally gave way to two uniform laws for the four states,the. F.M.S. Land Enactment of 1911 and the F.M.S.
Registration of Titles Enactment, 1911. Thus, uniformity oflaw and land administration was finally achieved within sixyears of the formation of the Federated Malay States,pursuant to the Agreement of 1895.
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
5/38
The Torrens System
Amongst the principal characteristics of the Torrenssystem first introduced into the Malay States which couldbe regarded as constituting a radical departure from the
rules of Malay customary tenure were:
1. All lands vest in the Ruler, who has the power toalienate land to his subjects either in perpetuity or for
a fixed term of up 99 years;
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
6/38
The Torrens System
2. All dealings in land must be in the prescribed form andmust be duly registered with the relevant authorities;failure to do so would render the dealings null and
void, as was clearly demonstrated by the PrivyCouncil in thejual janjicase of Haji Abdul Rahman &Anor. v. Mohamed Hassan (1917).
3. Owners of land are given indefeasibility of title, whichcould be questioned only under specialcircumstances.
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
7/38
The Torrens System
4. The traditional method of acquisition of virgin land orwaste land as permitted under the Malay customarytenure was abolished, as could be seen in the case of
Sidek & 46 J Ors, v. The Government of Perak (1982)
5. Forms of dealings which were recognized under thelaw were transfers, leases exceeding three years,
charges and liens; and
6. Two forms of caveats were recognized, namely privatecaveats and registrar's caveats.
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
8/38
The Torrens System
The uniform laws of 1911 mentioned above perpetuatedthe division of land in the country into two distinctcategories. The Land Enactment dealt with the
registration of country lands less than 100 acres in areaon a Mukim Register, i.e., lands formerly held under theMalay customary tenure.
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
9/38
The Torrens System
The Registration of Titles Enactment dealt with registrylands, i.e. town lands and country lands exceeding 100acres and estates. These two parallel legislation in the
Federated Malay States continued in force until it wasamended by the Land Code of 1926, which came intoforce on 1st January 1928 and came to be cited as theLand Code 1928 (Cap. 138 of Revised Laws).
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
10/38
The Torrens System
The Land Code 1928 effected further changes in thelaw, whilst maintaining the two categories of land andthe basic Torrens principles mentioned above. The
following changes were however introduced:
1. The principle of indefeasibility of title was moreclearly defined, with specific statutory exceptions
being spelt out.
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
11/38
The Torrens System
2. Adverse possession against individual owners of land isnow no longer possible; adverse possession against theState had been disallowed since the first Torrens
legislation in the respective States;
3. Customary tenure under Adat Perpatihis preserved
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
12/38
The Torrens System
4. The strictness regarding compliance with statutory formand registration as indicated in the Haji Abdul Rahmancase has been abandoned, as could be seen from the
decision of Federal Court in Mahadevan s/oMahalingamv. Manilal & Sons (M) Sdn. Bhd.
5. Specific types of cultivation were enforced.
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
13/38
The Torrens System
Whilst uniformity of law and consistent landadministration procedures were attained in the fourFederated Malay States, the position in the other five
Unfederated Malay States still lagged behind in neardisarray.
Thus, Johor had its Land Enactment of 1910, Kedah
had its Land Enactment of 1906, amended in 1912 andthe Concession Enactment of 1909, Kelantan andTerengganu had their own respective Land Enactmentsof 1938
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
14/38
The Torrens System
Essentially under the Torrens system the registerreflects all the facts material to the registered owner's
title in the land. These material facts refer to the nameof the proprietor for the time being, the land whichhas been alienated, its area and location, its surveyplan and its boundary limits.' The Torrens system has
thus endowed the register with the attributes of amirror of sorts that can reveal all the necessaryparticulars relating to the land that would interest apotential purchaser or chargee. Hence the label of"the mirror principle" as given by Das.
Twin Principle of Torrens system
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
15/38
The Torrens System
Twin Principle of Torrens system
Mirror PrincipleThe register document of title reveals all facts materialto the registered proprietor. All information andparticulars about the land appear on the register suchas it title number, type of title, size, location, conditionsto which the land is subject to, the present registered
proprietor and all past transaction history. One shouldnot look elsewhere to know about the land. He couldfind all material facts about the land looking at theregister.
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
16/38
The Torrens System
A second attribute of the Torrens system is that theregister becomes a "curtain". In any transaction
between the registered owner and any potentialpurchaser, the latter will be concerned only with theregister and nothing else. The purchaser can safelyrely on the information revealed in the register, and
he need not, nor may he, look behind it.
Twin Principle of Torrens system
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
17/38
The Torrens System
Twin Principle of Torrens system
Curtain Principle
With the register one should not look for moreinformation than what appear on the register. This meanthat the person who is registered as the proprietor ofthe land or any interest in land such as lease, charge
and easement shall be guaranteed that his title orinterest in protected against adverse claim. The title orinterest is indefeasible it cannot be challenged. Oneshould not concern with the history of the land.
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
18/38
The Torrens System
The cumulative effect of these principles is that theTorrens system has conferred an indefeasibility of title
to the registered owner. In Teh Bee v. K.Maruthamuthu (1977) the Federal Court held that,"under the Torrens system, the register is everything.
To allow an investigation as to the right of the person
who holds the title would be wrong because to do sowould defeat the purpose and object of registration.
Twin Principle of Torrens system
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
19/38
The Torrens System
Twin Principle of Torrens system
Advantages of Torrens to Individuali. Completeness
ii. Securityiii. Cheapiv. Simplicityv. Reliablevi. Expeditious
vii. Less possibility of lossviii. Less possibility of fraudix. Confidencex. Source of credit facilitiesxi. Reduction on litigationxii. Defects cured
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
20/38
The Torrens System
Twin Principle of Torrens system
Advantages of Torrens to State
i. Proper recordsii. Facilitate land administrationiii. Increased revenueiv. Complete datav. Feasibility studies
vi. Facilitate amendments to land lawvii. Facilitate land reform
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
21/38
The Torrens System
1. Adverse possession no longer possible
The National Land Code 1965 maintains the rulecontained in the earlier 1928 Code that adversepossession is no longer possible as against theState as well as against any individual landowner.
Basic Features of NLC 1965
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
22/38
The Torrens System
2. No possessory right however long
The case of Teh Beev. K. Maruthamuthu (supra)revealed that the temporary occupation licenceholder's possession of the land for some 21 yearsconferred no possessory rights whatsoever.
Basic Features of NLC 1965
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
23/38
The Torrens System
Despite the licensee's efforts in cultivating anddeveloping the land all those years, and despite
the irregularity in the alienation proceduresadopted by the State authority, the alienation ofthe land by the State authority to another personhas been held by the Federal Court to be beyond
question.
Basic Features of NLC 1965
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
24/38
The Torrens System
3. The rules of equity still apply
A Iong line of authorities, from as early as the pre-Code era in Wilkinsv Kannamaluntil Mahadevan s/oMahalingamv. Manilal & Sons (M) Sdn. Bhd. andbeyond have established beyond doubt that equity is
here to stay, existing side by side with the Torrenssystem, despite the court's vehement insistence that"under the Torrens system the register iseverything".15
Basic Features of NLC 1965
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
25/38
The Torrens System
4. Reversion to the State under severalcircumstances
Alienated land can revert to the State under variouscircumstances. Thus, land alienated for a fixed termof years i.e. a State lease, would revert to the State
upon expiry of the stipulated term.
Basic Features of NLC 1965
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
26/38
The Torrens System
Likewise, land could be forfeited by the State for non-
cultivation, for non-payment of rent or for breach ofsome other conditions, whether express or implied, orin cases where the registered owner dies withoutleaving any successors, or where the registered
owner has abandoned or surrendered the land backto the State.
Basic Features of NLC 1965
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
27/38
The Torrens System
5. Indefeasibility
Indefeasibility of title is guaranteed under the Codepursuant to sections 89 and 340 but it is not absolute.This is so because whilst section 89 states that everyregister document of title duly registered underChapter 3 of Part Five the Code shall be "conclusiveevidence" that title to the land is vested in the personfor the time being named therein as proprietor andsection 340 states that the title of any such person forthe time being registered as
Basic Features of NLC 1965
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
28/38
The Torrens System
5. Indefeasibility
proprietor "shall be indefeasible", the supremacy ofsuch title is still subject to the following: certain statutory exceptions as spelt out in
section 340(2);
exceptions in equity; exceptions under Malay custom or adat.
Basic Features of NLC 1965
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
29/38
The Torrens System
On the issue as to whether indefeasibility under theCode is immediate or deferred, the Federal Court
held, in Adorna Properties Sdn Blul v. BoonsomBoonyanit @ Sun Yok Eng thatbona fide purchasersfor value "obtained immediate indefeasibilitynotwithstanding that they acquired their titles under a
forged document. The Federal Court agreed with thetrial Judge that, on the facts of the case even if theinstrument of transfer was forged, the bona tidepurchaser "obtained an indefeasible title to the saidlands".
Basic Features of NLC 1965
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
30/38
The Torrens System
6. Strata titles recognised
For the first time, the Code provides for the issue ofstrata or subsidiary titles in the case of sub-dividedbuildings such as office complexes and condominiumhousings. These provisions in the 1965 Code were
subsequently repealed when replaced by the StrataTitles Act 1985, which came into force on 1st June1985.
Basic Features of NLC 1965
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
31/38
The Torrens System
7. Four types of caveats
The Code provides for four distinct types of caveats,i.e. the Registrar's caveats, private caveats, lien-holder's caveats and trust caveats. The caveatsystem is another peculiar attribute of the Torrens
system, serving to protect the interest of persons whohave non-registered registrable interests (orcaveatable interests) in the land of the registeredowner.
Basic Features of NLC 1965
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
32/38
The Torrens System
8. Easement
Until the late 80s, the law of easements follow strictlythe cardinal rule of the Torrens system that "theregister is everything", complying strictly with therequirement of section 284 - that easement can be
created only by express grant.26
In 1989, the rigidity ofthis law came to an end in Alfred Templetonv. LowYat Holdings,21when the court held that equity alsoapplies (just like all other dealings) to easements.
Basic Features of NLC 1965
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
33/38
The Torrens System
A non-exclusive system
The Malaysian Torrens system is essentially non-exclusive in nature and continues to be open-ended.Nine decades of its development since the first Torrenslaw was introduced in Selangor in 1891 showed that the
Torrens system had admitted the rules of equity at oneend, whilst at the other end Malay custom and Islamiclaw have been admitted to temper the rigidity of itsapplication.
Basic Features of NLC 1965
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
34/38
The Torrens System
It is due to this non-exclusive nature and its open-endedness that the system has worked so well in
Malaysia all these years.
In Kiahv. Som2*the court recognised a Malay woodenhouse built on stilts as moveable property,
notwithstanding the-rule under the Torrens system aswell as under the English law of property anything that isattached to land becomes part of the land, quic quidplantatur solo solo cedit.
Basic Features of NLC 1965
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
35/38
The Torrens System
In Robertsv. Ummi Kalthom29the court had to considerwhether a house purchased with monies pooled together
by thejspouses during the subsistence of their marriageand subsequently registered in the wife's name waseither:
a) a joint matrimonial property or harta sepencarianas it is known under Malay custom; orb) the wife's personal property by virtue of a gift
made by the husband to the wife in accordancewith the Islamic law of hibah.
Basic Features of NLC 1965
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
36/38
The Torrens System
On the evidence adduced, the court was satisfied thatthe house was harta sepencarianin which both parties
have rights thereto, thus displacing the cardinal rule ofthe Torrens system that "the register is everything".
Whilst the court was not satisfied, on the evidence
adduced by the wife, that the house had been conveyedas a gift according to Islamic law (as hibali), the courtwas prepared to hold that if it was so proven the Islamiclaw of hibahwould have operated as another exceptionto the Torrens rule that the register is everything.
Basic Features of NLC 1965
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
37/38
The Torrens System
In conclusion, inclusive of statutes, the MalaysianTorrens system can be said to be grounded on the
harmonious blending of four distinctive sources of law,and in their chronological order. These are as follows:
(i) Customary law, followed by
(ii) Islamic law,(iii) English law - i.e. common law and equity(iv) modern statutes.
Basic Features of NLC 1965
8/4/2019 BSB511 Lecture 3 (Torrens System & NLC)
38/38
thank you